NAMAs in MRV Mannerfor Waste Sector in Vietnamand opportunities for JCM

Content

NAMAs in Waste Sector

– Target

– Preliminary Results

– Future work

Linkage of JCM with NAMAs

Challenges to implement NAMAs and JCM

GHG emission by sector in Vietnam in 2005

ENERGY

INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES

AGRICULTURE

WASTE

Agriculture

39%

Agriculture

39%

Energy

50%

IP7%

4%

Source: Capacity building for National GHG inventory inVietnam project supported by JICA (2010-2014)

NAMAs in Waste Sector in Vietnam

• General information:– At COP17 in Doha, the MONRE, Vietnam, with

other ministries, and the MOEJ generally agreed tolaunch capacity-building on NAMAs in a MRVablemanner;

• Objectives:– To determine BAU and NAMAs scenarios in the

Waste Sector in Vietnam.– To propose a domestic NAMAs guideline in MRV

manner in waste sector.

Working Group

5

MONRE MOEJ

NAMA Working GroupMONRE MOC MPI

VEA ISPONREMOEJ JICA and others…..

Vietnamese Organizations Japan NAMA Support Team(base study/ secretariat function)

Designation/Advice

Recommendation

Designation/Advice/

Finance

base study/secretariat function

TechnicalAdvices/training /Finance

Recommendation

SecretariatIMHEN &

OECC

ICD(support)

IMHEN(NAMA & Reference scenarios, Pre-study, etc)

WENID-VEA

(support)

OECC(Secretariat& Support)

Consultant ExpertsVietnameseConsultant(support)

Municipal Solid Waste in Vietnam

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

2007 2008 2009 2010

Urb

anSo

lidW

aste

(ton

/day

)

Year

18％

16％8％

{Source: MONRE (2011) National Environmental Report 2011: Solid Waste, p. 16}

Preliminary Results

1. Established an inter-ministerial WG, which may be acore group for national-level decision making (andpolicy-level MRV).

2. Identified BAU and emission reduction potentials(2012 to 2020) with a bottom-up approach toquantifying GHGs.

3. Identified useful low carbon technologies that can beintroduced for NAMAs.

4. Identified NAMAs scenarios for Waste Sector inVietnam.

5. Jointly held a side event at COP18 in 2012 andanother side even at SB38 in 2013.

BAU Scenarios

Scenario 1 Scenario 2

GrowthRate ofMSW

10% (Based on the 2011 NationalEnvi. Report )

3.27% (based on estimated futuregrowth in population and GDP)

Cal. Method: IPCC 2006:

Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC)

Ha Noi

Ninh Binh

0

5000000

10000000

15000000

20000000

25000000

30000000

35000000

40000000

45000000

50000000

CO

2e

(to

n)

year

Vung TauLong XuyenLong AnKien GiangHCMC Tan Binh DistrictHCMC District 6HCMC District 12HCMC District 10Binh DuongHa TinhYen BaiVinhTu LiemSoc SonQuang NinhNinh BinhHa DongGia LamDong NaiDong AnhBao LacTien GiangHau GiangBinh PhuocBac NinhBac LieuThua Thien HueTay NinhPhu YenNinh ThuanKon tumKhanh HoaDaknongDak LakBinh DinhTuyen QuangThai BinhPhu ThoNghe AnLang Son

Ha Noi

Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC)

Ninh Binh

0

10000000

20000000

30000000

40000000

50000000

60000000

70000000

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030

MS

W(t

on

)

year

Cam Ranh Yen BaiVung Tau Vinh PhucVinh Long VinhTuyen Quang Tu LiemTra Vinh Tien GiangThua Thien Hue Thanh HoaThai Nguyen Thai BinhTay Ninh Son LaSoc Trang Soc SonSam Son Quy NhonQuang Tri Quang NinhQuang Ngai Quang NamQuang Binh PleikuPhu Yen Phu ThoNinh Thuan Ninh BinhNha Trang Nghe AnNam Dinh Long XuyenLong An Lao CaiLang Son Lai ChauKon tum Kien GiangKhanh Hoa Hung YenHue Hoa BinhHo Chi Minh City (HCMC) HCMC Tan Binh DistrictHCMC District 6 HCMC District 12HCMC District 10 Hau GiangHai Phong Hai DuongHa Tinh Ha NoiHa Nam Ha GiangHa Dong Gia LamDong Nai Dong AnhDien Bien DaknongDak Lak Da NangDa lat Cao BangCan Tho Ca MauBinh Phuoc Binh DuongBinh Dinh Bim SonBen Tre Bao LacBac Ninh Bac LieuBac Kan Bac Giang

Total GHG Emissions from 2013-2020:97,576,475 tCO2e

Total GHG Emissions from 2013-2020:62,869,748 tCO2e

)(

,CH4 )1(12

16)1()1(

0

tykk

j

y

yt jtjfy

jj eeDOCAMCFDOCFracOxGWPfBE

Technologies For Waste Sector

Determining appropriatemitigation technologies

under NAMAs

Information collection throughtrade fair, Interview/meetingwith stakeholders, utilization ofdatabase, etc.

Short-listing

Short list

Long listSelecting theappropriatetechnologies

semi anaerobic landfill

NAMA Scenarios for Waste Sector in Vietnam

Scenario 1 Scenario 2

Growth Rateof MSW

10% (Based on the National Envi.Report 2011)

3.27% (based on estimated futuregrowth in population and GDP)

SelectedTec.

Semi-aerobic Landfill Semi-aerobic Landfill

0

2,000,000

4,000,000

6,000,000

8,000,000

10,000,000

12,000,000

14,000,000

16,000,000

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

20

18

20

19

20

20

20

21

20

22

20

23

20

24

20

25

20

26

20

27

20

28

20

29

20

30

CO

2e

(to

n)

Year

BAU

semi-aerobictechnology

0

5,000,000

10,000,000

15,000,000

20,000,000

25,000,000

30,000,000

35,000,000

40,000,000

45,000,000

50,000,000

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

20

18

20

19

20

20

20

21

20

22

20

23

20

24

20

25

20

26

20

27

20

28

20

29

20

30

CO

2e

(to

n)

Year

BAU

semi-aerobictechnology

Total GHG emissions reduction(2013-2020): 48,788,238 tCO2e

Total GHG emissions reduction(2013-2020): . 31,434,874 tCO2e

2013 FY Activities

11

1. Collect information of technology option

2. Collect data & information for BAU and NAMAscenario in the waste sector

3. Improve BAU and NAMA scenario in the Wastesector

4. Organize Workshops

5. Drafting NAMA Implementation plan

• The Agreement of JCM was signed by Vietnameseand Japanese governments in July 2013;

• The ultimate goal of NAMAs and JCM is to reducingthe GHG to mitigate climate change;

• JCM can be consider as an additional tool tosupport NAMAs at pilot stage and up scaling stage;

• JCM can take advantage of NAMAs by referring itsdesigned scenarios, institution, technologies andstrategies.

Opportunities for Linking JCM Activities withNAMAs in Vietnam

PreparationPhase

Pilot phaseNAMA-up-

scaling phase

NAMA Scheme

Opportunities

• Capacity buildingsupport

Technology supportFinance support

TechnologysupportFinance support

JCM JCM

• Both NAMAs and JCM concepts are relatively new inVietnam (and international communities);

• Not yet popular for stakeholders;• Lack of proper institution such as policy, strategies,

institutional arrangement to support the implementation ofNAMAs and JCM in VN

• Lack of capacity; Lack of human resources;• Lack of finance, esp. for renewable energy projects such as

wind power, solar power which require high investment andcost;

• Lack of awareness from communities on climate changemitigation actions;

Remaining challenges to implement NAMAand JCM projects

Thank You VeryMuch !

どうもありがとうございました