MT. VIEW ELEMENTARY MT. VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOLSCHOOL

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ADJUSTMENTSADJUSTMENTS

2009-20102009-2010

3 Year Reading Trend3 Year Reading Trend

3 Year Math Trend3 Year Math Trend

3 Year Writing Trend3 Year Writing Trend

3 Year Science Trend3 Year Science Trend

2009 WASL Comparisons2009 WASL Comparisons

* Higher than district average ** Higher than state average

TACKING TO GAIN MOMENTUMTACKING TO GAIN MOMENTUM

2008-2011 Reading Goals In Review2008-2011 Reading Goals In Review

• Increase Reading WASL scores to 88.1 by 2011.– We are not there yet, but are working hard to

be there by 2011.• Met target in “All” category (2009).• Met target in all other sub-categories

required (2009)

2008-09 Reading Initiatives2008-09 Reading Initiatives• Staff development time utilized to align pacing

calendars, lessons and materials with areas of concern (Comprehension of literary texts and analysis/interpretation of informational text.

• Beginning steps to learn about RTI – Wayne Callender and Patricia Calabrese Workshops– Reading “RTI From All Sides”, Howard, Mary (2009)

• Reading incentive program (Reading Counts) goals set higher to motivate more reading.

• Piloted diagnostic/prescriptive on-line reading program (DORA/Unique Reader).

Reading Assessment & AYPReading Assessment & AYPCE Students % CE met

standard Adj % met Uniform Bar Diff Index Met Target?Previous year Weighted %

CE met

% Reduction in not

meeting standard

Met 10% reduction?

Met other indicator? Met Target?

Grade 3 120 75 84.2 76.1 8.1Grade 4 103 69.9 80.4 76.1 4.3Grade 5 93 77.4 87.5 76.1 11.4Grade 3 2 100 100 76.1 23.9Grade 4 7 71.4 100 76.1 23.9Grade 5 4 75 100 76.1 23.9Grade 3 2 100 100 76.1 23.9Grade 4 7 71.4 100 76.1 23.9Grade 5Grade 3 3 66.7 100 76.1 23.9Grade 4 3 33.3 96.7 76.1 20.6Grade 5 3 66.7 100 76.1 23.9Grade 3 9 66.7 100 76.1 23.9Grade 4 12 41.7 74.9 76.1 -1.2Grade 5 6 50 97.6 76.1 21.5Grade 3 100 74 84.2 76.1 8.1Grade 4 74 75.7 87.3 76.1 11.2Grade 5 76 80.3 90.9 76.1 14.8Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5Grade 3 25 52 75.3 76.1 -0.8Grade 4 25 48 71.3 76.1 -4.8Grade 5 14 57.1 87.9 76.1 11.8Grade 3 65 66.2 79.9 76.1 3.8Grade 4 64 59.4 73.7 76.1 -2.4Grade 5 45 64.4 81 76.1 4.9 Yes

Low Income

1.8 Yes

Yes

Special Education

0.4 Yes

N/A

Limited English

N/A

YesWhite

11.1 Yes

N<Required

Hispanic

12.2 N<Required

N<Required

Black

22.8 N<Required

N<Required

Asian/Pacific Islander

23.9 N<Required

N<Required

American Indian

23.9 N<Required

Yes

All

7.8 Yes

2008-2011 Math Goals In Review2008-2011 Math Goals In Review

• Increase Math WASL scores to 82.4 by 2011.– We are not there yet, but are working to be

there by 2011.• Met Target in “All” category and all sub-

categories with the exception of “Special Education Math” and “Low Income Math”.

2008-09 Math Initiatives2008-09 Math Initiatives

• Staff development time utilized to align pacing calendars, lessons and materials with new standards.

• Materials sought to help fill in areas in which general curriculum is weak.

• All staff were trained In “Young Mathematicians” training (Heather Dorsey).

• Plan to include more instruction in “Algebraic Sense”, “Probability and Statistics”, “Math Vocabulary” and “Measurement”.

• Staff worked on plans to help students gain automaticity in basic facts.

Math Assessment & AYPMath Assessment & AYPCE Students % CE met

standardAdj % met Uniform Bar Diff Index Met Target?

Previous year Weighted %

CE met

% Reduction in not

meeting standard

Met 10% reduction?

Met other indicator?

Met Target?

Grade 3 120 67.5 77.5 64.9 12.6Grade 4 104 50 61.4 64.9 -3.5Grade 5 95 62.1 73.7 64.9 8.8Grade 3 2 100 100 64.9 35.1Grade 4 7 28.6 68.4 64.9 3.5Grade 5 4 50 100 64.9 35.1Grade 3 2 100 100 64.9 35.1Grade 4 7 57.1 100 64.9 35.1Grade 5Grade 3 3 66.7 100 64.9 35.1Grade 4 3 33.3 96.7 64.9 31.8Grade 5 3 33.3 96.7 64.9 31.8Grade 3 9 55.6 94.2 64.9 29.3Grade 4 13 30.8 60.6 64.9 -4.3Grade 5 8 12.5 39.7 64.9 -25.2Grade 3 100 66 77 64.9 12.1Grade 4 74 55.4 68.9 64.9 4Grade 5 76 68.4 80.8 64.9 15.9Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5Grade 3 25 68 89.7 64.9 24.8Grade 4 26 23.1 42.4 64.9 -22.5Grade 5 16 31.3 58.3 64.9 -6.6Grade 3 65 61.5 75.6 64.9 10.7Grade 4 65 35.4 49.2 64.9 -15.7Grade 5 47 51.1 68.1 64.9 3.2

All

6.2 Yes Yes

American Indian

18.1 N<Required N<Required

Asian/Pacific Islander

35.1 N<Required N<Required

Black

32.9 N<Required N<Required

Hispanic

0.2 Yes Yes

White

10.9 Yes Yes

Limited English

N/A N/A

Special Education

-1.1 No 51.7 -20.6 No Yes No

Low Income

-1 No 53 -8.2 No Yes No

CE Students % CE met standard Adj % met Uniform Bar Diff Index Met Target?

Previous year Weighted %

CE met

% Reduction in not

meeting standard

Met 10% reduction?

Met other indicator? Met Target?

Grade 3 120 67.5 77.5 64.9 12.6Grade 4 104 50 61.4 64.9 -3.5Grade 5 95 62.1 73.7 64.9 8.8Grade 3 2 100 100 64.9 35.1Grade 4 7 28.6 68.4 64.9 3.5Grade 5 4 50 100 64.9 35.1Grade 3 2 100 100 64.9 35.1Grade 4 7 57.1 100 64.9 35.1Grade 5Grade 3 3 66.7 100 64.9 35.1Grade 4 3 33.3 96.7 64.9 31.8Grade 5 3 33.3 96.7 64.9 31.8Grade 3 9 55.6 94.2 64.9 29.3Grade 4 13 30.8 60.6 64.9 -4.3Grade 5 8 12.5 39.7 64.9 -25.2Grade 3 100 66 77 64.9 12.1Grade 4 74 55.4 68.9 64.9 4Grade 5 76 68.4 80.8 64.9 15.9Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5Grade 3 25 68 89.7 64.9 24.8Grade 4 26 23.1 42.4 64.9 -22.5Grade 5 16 31.3 58.3 64.9 -6.6Grade 3 65 61.5 75.6 64.9 10.7Grade 4 65 35.4 49.2 64.9 -15.7Grade 5 47 51.1 68.1 64.9 3.2

All

6.2 Yes Yes

American Indian

18.1 N<Required N<Required

Asian/Pacific Islander

35.1 N<Required N<Required

Black

32.9 N<Required N<Required

Hispanic

0.2 Yes Yes

White

10.9 Yes Yes

Limited English

N/A N/A

Special Education

-1.1 No 51.7 -20.6 No Yes No

Low Income

-1 No 53 -8.2 No Yes No

Targets In Our SightsTargets In Our Sights

• Reading (Targets met, but too close for comfort)– Special Education– Low Income

• Math (Targets not met)– Special Education– Low Income

Reading Goals for 2009-2010Reading Goals for 2009-2010• Increase reading adjusted scores to 78%

or better in “Special Education Subgroup” (Above Bar).

• Increase reading adjusted scores to 78% or better in “Low income subgroup”

(Above Bar)• Increase reading adjusted scores to 85% in

“All” group (Above Bar)• Improve EasyCBM reading scores

fall/spring

How Will We Get There in Reading?How Will We Get There in Reading?

• Begin to implement RTI tiered instruction• Use data from EasyCBM to monitor

student progress and make ongoing adjustments to classroom instruction

• Develop grade level math word lists, and teach/assess math vocabulary in a systematic way across all grade levels

• Initiate a plan for increased instruction/ assessment of literal and inferential comprehension at every level

How Will we Get There in Reading? llHow Will we Get There in Reading? ll

• Utilize non- fiction books, that tie in with our science and social studies units, to improve comprehension, higher level thinking and problem solving skills

• Implementation of specific intervention time in at least three grade levels by the end of 09 -10

Math Goals for 2009-2010Math Goals for 2009-2010

• Increase math adjusted scores to 66% or better in “Special Education Subgroup” (Above Bar).

• Increase math adjusted scores to 66% or better in “Low Income Subgroup”

(Above Bar)• Increase math adjusted scores to 73% in

“All” group (Above Bar)

How will We Get There in Math?How will We Get There in Math?

• Develop and use common grade level assessments in math to assess and adjust instruction.

• Initiate efforts at every grade level to work at school and at home to increase automaticity in basic math facts.

• Develop grade level math word lists, and teach/assess math vocabulary in a systematic way across all grade levels

How will We Get There in Math ll?How will We Get There in Math ll?

• Plan and initiate a greater focus on reading skills within the context of math instruction at all levels of instruction

• Skills grouping as needed in 3/4/5 in order to focus on enrichment and interventions as identified by grade levels using common assessments

Ongoing InitiativesOngoing Initiatives• Studying/Implementing PLCs• Studying/Implementing RTI reading• Implementing EasyCBM reading

assessments• Implementing intervention friendly schedule• Implementing Breakthrough Coach Training• Increasing number and quality of CWTs• Benchmark 3x and frequent progress

monitoring for those needing it