Mobile Video Experience to VMOS 4.0 Methodology

download Mobile Video Experience to VMOS 4.0 Methodology

of 10

Transcript of Mobile Video Experience to VMOS 4.0 Methodology

  • 7/25/2019 Mobile Video Experience to VMOS 4.0 Methodology

    1/10

    Mobile Video Experience

    to

    vMOS

    4.0 Methodology

  • 7/25/2019 Mobile Video Experience to VMOS 4.0 Methodology

    2/10

    Mobile vMOS Formula

    Score

    Initial Buffering

    Latency

    (sLoading)

    Excellent

    (5)100ms

    Good (4) 1s

    Fair (3) 3s

    Poor (2) 5s

    Bad (1) 10s

    VideoDefinition

    Maximum

    Score

    sQuality)

    Typical

    Score

    Range*

    5K & above 5 3.5~5.0

    4K 4.9 2.6~4.8

    2K 4.8 2.55~4.7

    1080P 4.5 2.4~4.4

    720P 4 2.1~3.9

    480P 3.6 1.6~3.4

    360P 2.8 1.0~2.6

    ScoreStalling duration

    rate (1min)

    St

    Excellent (5) 0%

    Good (4)5%

    Fair (3)10%

    Poor (2)15%

    Bad (1)

    30%

    Mobile vMOS = (sQuality, sLoading, sStalling)

    sQuality = f(v_res, v_br, v_codec, v_profile)

    v_res: 360p, 480p, 720p, 1080p, etc.

    v_br: video bitrates (kbps)

    v_codec: H.264/H.265 etc

    v_profile: codec profile

    sLoading = f( init_buf_latency )

    Init_buf_latency: the period between cli

    the start of play

    sStalling = f( stalling_ratio )

    Stalling_ratio: stalling duration / video p

  • 7/25/2019 Mobile Video Experience to VMOS 4.0 Methodology

    3/10

    Video Coverage: 3 Steps for Video-Centric Network Plan

    Service insight and

    vMOS target setting1 3Network

    solution2Gap identification and

    root cause analysis

    Video Insight

    vMOS Evaluation & Target

    50*50 Grid Visualization

    vMOS Issue Demarcation

    vMOS GAP Identification

    Root Cause Analysis

    Feature En

    Carrier/Sec

    New Site A

    vMOS = f (sQuality, sLoading, sStalling)

    vMOS

    Throughput

    Latenc

    y

    Stalling

    1080p

    2K

    720p

    Fair@720P Good @1K Excellent @2K

    vMOS 3

    vMOS 3.5

    vMOS 4.0

  • 7/25/2019 Mobile Video Experience to VMOS 4.0 Methodology

    4/10

    Step 1: Video Traffic and Application Insight

    Video Traffic Distribution

    Video Traffic(MB)100

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    Video Application Usage Distribution

    Video Traffic

    Percent (%)

    28.60

    %

    71.40

    %

    Video

    Other

    Video Traffic Percent (%)

  • 7/25/2019 Mobile Video Experience to VMOS 4.0 Methodology

    5/10

    240P 360P 480P 720P 1080P1440P

    Step1: Example of Target Setting

    Traffic % per definition

    0% 50% 100%

    [1,2.8]

    (2.8,3.2]

    (3.2,3.6]

    (3.6,4]

    (4,4.5]

    108

    720

    1 2

    3

    Analyze video consumption habits

    VoD heat map

    Experience map

    Definition map

    Current vMOS distributio

    Set 1080p vMOS=3.6 95%

    as the target

    0% 50% 1

    (4.0,4.2]

    (3.6,4.0]

    (3.0,3.6]

    10

    2K

  • 7/25/2019 Mobile Video Experience to VMOS 4.0 Methodology

    6/10

    Step2: Video Problem Demarcation Principle

    Slow start delay

    RTT

    Linear buffer delay

    speed

    FixedUncontroll

    able Controllable

    Controllable

    Delay

    Y

    Delay

    X

    Buffer Data BSZ

    Delay

    Z

    APP

    prepare

    delay

    500ms

    Initial Buffer

    Start Success Ratio Mapping RTT&Speed

    Play stall times Mapping Speed

    Initial Buffer Component

    Slow start

    buffer data

    B_inti

    Initia

    0.00

    0.01

    RTT

    Initial Buffer vs. Air Interface

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    0 50 100 150

    34.7ms

    Initial

    Buffer(s)

    Initial Buffer- RTT

    Relationship

    If initial buffer delay < 3 seconds, RTT(Air Inte

    34.7ms.

    For low vMOS , If RTT > 34.7ms, RAN side

    Otherwise low vMOS is due to Non-RAN side p

    Typ

    1080

    Stal

    Initia

    Air I

  • 7/25/2019 Mobile Video Experience to VMOS 4.0 Methodology

    7/10

    Step 2: vMOS GAP Finding and Root Cause Anal

    GAP identification by 50*50m grid

    Low vMOS Area A:

    Target vMOS 3.5

    Actual vMOS 2

    70% grid less than target

    Low vMOS Area B:

    Target vMOS 3.8

    Actual vMOS 3

    42% grid less than target

    wireless resource.

    Low vMOS Area C:

    Target vMOS 4.2

    Actual vMOS 2.8

    36% grid less than target

    number.

    [4, 5)

    [3, 4)

    [2, 3)[1, 2)

    < 1

    coverage related

    capacity related

    users distribution related

    vMOS Grid Number Grid Ratio

  • 7/25/2019 Mobile Video Experience to VMOS 4.0 Methodology

    8/10

    Step3 : Network Planning and Solution

    OriginalvMOS InsightFinalAf

    Features

    Enhancement

    Multi-sector

    Multi-Carrier

    Macro site

    Micro site

    vMOS achi

    Convergence

    Carrier

    Macro

    Micro

    Prioritized

    Rolling Planning

    vMOS: 4.8

  • 7/25/2019 Mobile Video Experience to VMOS 4.0 Methodology

    9/10

    Summary

    New standard of video experience evaluation

    MethodologyResearch

    Standardization Industrialization

    E2E Mobile Video Solution lift video experience to vMOS 4.0

    Wide-band 0 Waiting 0 Stalling Smart and Open

    Video Coverage: 3 Steps for Video-Centric Network Planning

    Service insight GAP Finding Network planning

  • 7/25/2019 Mobile Video Experience to VMOS 4.0 Methodology

    10/10