Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

48
Microeconomics Second Edition, Global Edition Chapter 12 Monopoly Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Transcript of Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Page 1: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

MicroeconomicsSecond Edition, Global Edition

Chapter 12Monopoly

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Page 2: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Monopoly: One seller of a good or service with no

close substitutes

Price makers: Sellers that can set the price of a

good

Market power: The ability to set the price

Page 3: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Outline

12.1 Introducing a New Market Structure

12.2 Sources of Market Power

12.3 The Monopolist’s Problem

12.4 Choosing the Optimal Quantity and Price

12.5 The “Broken” Invisible Hand: The

Cost of Monopoly

12.6 Restoring Efficiency

12.7 Government Policy toward Monopoly

Page 4: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Evidence-Based Economics Example:

Can a monopoly ever be good for society?

一家藥廠 SP,研發出一款過敏藥 (Claritin), 拿到了專利可以獨賣20年,如果你是藥商CEO,你會怎麼訂價?

Page 5: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Key Ideas

1. Monopoly represents an extreme market

structure with a single seller.

2. Monopolies arise both naturally and

through government protection.

3. Monopolists are price-makers and produce

at the point where marginal revenue equals

marginal cost.

Page 6: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Key Ideas – efficiency

• The (single-price) monopolist maximizes profits by

producing a lower quantity and charging a higher price than

perfectly competitive sellers. The result is deadweight loss.

• Efficiency can be established in a monopoly through first-

degree price discrimination (完全差別取價) or government

intervention.

Page 7: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

什麼樣的情境造成其他廠商難以進入市場?

Types of barriers to entry

1. Legal market power

2. Natural market power

• (1) Control of key resources

• (2) Economies of scale

Barriers to entry

Page 8: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

1. Legal market power

(a) Government-granted permission to be the

sole producer and seller of a good

專利權Patent ® ;

早期台鹽;台糖;台鐵

(b) Government-granted rights to the creator

of literary or artistic work

智慧財產權Copyright ©

Page 9: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

2. Natural market power

When a single firm obtains market power

through barriers to entry created by the firm

itself.

(1) Control of key resources essential for the

production of a good or service

(2) Economies of scale

Page 10: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Examples:

• Alcoa controlling bauxite, used in production of

aluminum

• De Beers’ control of diamond production

Control of Key Resources

Page 11: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Control of Key Resources

Network externalities : When a product’s value

increases as more consumers use it

Ex: Facebook, eBay,

FB have million of users : key resources

最近臉書被告了:

https://www.storm.mg/article/3284179

Page 12: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Natural monopoly

Emerges because it enjoys economies of

scale over a very large range of output Q

ATC (Q) > MC (Q) even when Q is large

Economies of scale

Page 13: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Quick Review: ATC and MC in the competitive market

Page 14: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Average Total Cost and Marginal Cost for

a Natural Monopoly

Page 15: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Both monopolist and perfect competitor

• Produce an output using a production process and inputs

• Incur production costs

Can a monopolist charge any price it wants to?

Monopoly Problem:

單一價格時如何定價?

Page 16: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Perfectly Competitive Firms and

Monopolies Face Different Demand

Curves

Page 17: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

藥商SP應該要如何為產品Claritin定價呢?

Optimal Choice: MR=MC.

Unlike a firm in a competitive market, MR is not P.

Page 18: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Exhibit 12.5 Revenues and Costs for

Claritin at Different Levels of Output

Quantity

(in millions

of pills)

Price Total

Revenue

(in

millions)

Marginal

Revenue

Total Cost

(in millions)

Fixed Cost

(in millions)

Marginal

Cost

ATC

100 $5.50 $550 $5 $110 $10 $1.00 $1.10

200 $5.00 $1,000 $4 $210 $10 $1.00 $1.05

300 $4.50 $1,350 $3 $310 $10 $1.00 $1.033

400 $4.00 $1,600 $2 $410 $10 $1.00 $1.025

500 $3.50 $1,750 $1 $510 $10 $1.00 $1.02

600 $3.00 $1,800 $0 $610 $10 $1.00 $1.017

700 $2.50 $1,750 –$1 $710 $10 $1.00 $1.014

800 $2.00 $1,600 –$2 $810 $10 $1.00 $1.013

900 900

$1.50

$1,350 –$3 $910 $10 $1.00 $1.011

1,000 $1.00 $1,000 –$4 $1,010 $10 $1.00 $1.01

1,100 $0.50 $550 –$5 $1,110 $10 $1.00 $1.009

Page 19: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Understanding MR:

Example: Assume this monopolist is selling 200 units at a

price of $5 each and wants to increase the quantity it sells to

400 units. It has to lower the price to $4 to do so.

Good News Bad News

Selling 200 more units Charging $1 less on

at $4 each = $800 200 units it was selling

before = -$200

Page 20: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Exhibit 12.6 The Quantity Effect and the

Price Effect on Revenues for Claritin

Page 21: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Relationship among Price, Marginal Revenue,

and Total Revenue

Page 22: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Exhibit 12.8 Marginal Revenue and

Marginal Cost for Claritin

Page 23: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Exhibit 12.9 Choosing the Profit-

Maximizing Price for Claritin

Page 24: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Profit = Total revenue – total cost

Total revenue = P x Q

Total cost = ATC x Q

Profit = (P x Q) – (ATC x Q)

= Q (P – ATC)

Profit = 500M($3.50 - $1.02)

= $1,240,000,000

Page 25: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Exhibit 12.10 Computing Profits for a

Monopolist

Page 26: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

A supply curve answers the question:

If the price is $x, how many units does the firm want

to produce?

A monopolist is not a price taker, but a price maker;

therefore, the supply relationship does not exist.

獨佔廠商有沒有供給線?

Page 27: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Surplus Allocations: Perfect Competition

Versus Monopoly

Page 28: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Exhibit 12.1 Two Market StructuresCharacteristic Perfect Competition Monopoly

Number of firms/sellers/

producers

Many One

Type of product/service

sold

Identical

(homogeneous)

Good or service with no

close

substitutes

Example of product Corn grown by various

farmers

Patented drugs; tap water

Barriers to entry None: free entry and

exit

Yes: high

Price-taker or price-

maker?

Price-taker; price given

by the

market

Price-maker—no

competitors;

no close substitutes

Price P = MR = MC Set P > MR = MC

Demand curve facing

the

firm

Horizontally sloped;

perfectly

elastic demand curve

Downward-sloping

Social surplus Maximized Not maximized, but

sometimes

society benefits from

research

and development

Equilibrium long-run

profits

Zero Potentially greater than

zero

Page 29: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

The “Broken” Invisible Hand

看不見的手不再神奇

Page 30: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

• Price Discrimination

• Government Regulation

Restoring Efficiency

Page 31: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Price discrimination

Charging different customers different prices for the

same good or service when there are no cost

differences

Page 32: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Three degrees of price discrimination

1. First-degree (perfect)

2. Second-degree (依購買商品特性設計各式定價,

比如說襪子3個100,一雙40 )

3. Third-degree (依消費者特質可觀察的特質進行差

別取價)

Page 33: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

First-degree (perfect) price

discrimination

When each consumer is charged the

maximum he/she is willing to pay

Examples: buying a car, eBay

Page 34: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Surplus Allocations For a Monopoly:

With and Without Perfect Price

Discrimination

Page 35: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Third-degree price discrimination

Consumers are charged different prices

based on the characteristics of the customer or

location

Examples: senior citizen discounts, student

discounts, theater matinee discounts

Page 36: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Why create different markets?

Page 37: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

What if firms don’t know

what someone’s willingness

to pay (elasticity) is?

Page 38: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Second-degree price discrimination

Consumers are charged different prices based on

the characteristics of the purchase

Examples:

百貨公司周年慶

排隊排很久才能買到的特價商品

last-minute hotel rooms

商務艙經濟艙

Page 39: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Why do firms offer mail-in (or online) rebates

instead of just discounting the price up front?

為什麼商品抽獎活動常常很麻煩?

Page 40: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Government Intervention 政府能做什麼?

• Antitrust policy

• try to prevent anti-competitive pricing, low quantities, and

deadweight loss from emerging and dominating markets

• 反托拉斯法 (美國)

• 公平交易法 (台灣)

• Price regulation

• 台電的電價

Page 41: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Efficient (socially optimal) price

Price is equal to marginal cost

Fair-returns price

Price is equal to average total cost

Price Regulations

Page 42: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Exhibit 12.11 Surplus Allocations: Perfect

Competition Versus Monopoly

Page 43: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Antitrust policy – US example

Sherman Act (1890): Prohibited agreements or actions that

would put restraints on trade

Clayton Antitrust Act (1914): Strengthened the government’s

powers and authorized private lawsuits

Example: Microsoft case (1998)

Page 44: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Microsoft accused of restraint of trade

• Monopolizing market

• Bundling Windows operating system with Internet

Explorer browser

• Keeping competitors from obtaining large market

share

Page 45: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Ruling

• Microsoft was not broken up into two separate

firms (one for operating system and one for

applications)

• But it had to change marketing practices and

make it easier for other browsers to work with

Windows

Page 46: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

好樂迪與錢櫃申請合併

2019: 提出第四次申請,公平交易委員會不同意

理由: 聯合市佔率超過4成5

2020: 錢櫃提出行政訴訟敗訴

• https://www.storm.mg/lifestyle/1618845

• https://news.cnyes.com/news/id/4398717

• https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/202011260308.aspx

如果你是好樂迪與錢櫃雇用的經濟學家,或是Microsoft 雇用的經濟學家,你會做什麼樣的論述,尋找什麼樣的數據?

Page 47: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Evidence-Based Economics Example:

Can a monopoly ever

be good for society?

Page 48: Microeconomics - cool.ntu.edu.tw

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Evidence-Based Economics Example:

Evidence suggests that market power can be an

important factor in innovation

Strongest case when firms are in industries with

brilliant competitors to mimic and spur innovation