MethaneDigester Design

26
Air Pollution Control Air Pollution Control Specific to Specific to Methane Digestion in the Methane Digestion in the landfill landfill Skill towards bioremediation for air Skill towards bioremediation for air pollution pollution Engineering skills for Methane Engineering skills for Methane digester design digester design

Transcript of MethaneDigester Design

Page 1: MethaneDigester Design

Air Pollution ControlAir Pollution Control

Specific to Specific to Methane Digestion in the Methane Digestion in the landfilllandfill

Skill towards bioremediation for air Skill towards bioremediation for air pollutionpollution

Engineering skills for Methane Engineering skills for Methane digester designdigester design

Page 2: MethaneDigester Design

Study of Methane Study of Methane Digestion in a Newly Digestion in a Newly

Designed BiofilterDesigned Biofilter

Page 3: MethaneDigester Design

Specific Objectives:Specific Objectives:

To design a methane biofilterTo design a methane biofilter To find out the suitable material To find out the suitable material

to maximize the bio-digestion to maximize the bio-digestion of methane.of methane.

To develop a relation between To develop a relation between biomass growth and methane biomass growth and methane consumption efficiency.consumption efficiency.

Page 4: MethaneDigester Design

Experimental setup for the methane Experimental setup for the methane biofilterbiofilter

Page 5: MethaneDigester Design

Another view of the experimental Another view of the experimental setupsetup

Page 6: MethaneDigester Design

a] Schematic diagram of the experimental a] Schematic diagram of the experimental

Biofilter Column and [b] Top ViewBiofilter Column and [b] Top View

Page 7: MethaneDigester Design

Different properties of filter materialsDifferent properties of filter materials

7.86.87.2pH

39845Ignition loss (%)

0.68.737Water Content (%)

1310168568Bulk Density (kg/m3)

SandSawdustCompostParameter

Page 8: MethaneDigester Design

[a] Gas collection balloons, [b][a] Gas collection balloons, [b] Solution Solution extracted from compost, sawdust, and sandextracted from compost, sawdust, and sand

Page 9: MethaneDigester Design

[a] Gas Chromatograph, [b][a] Gas Chromatograph, [b] GC GC Syringe openingSyringe opening

Page 10: MethaneDigester Design

[a] Seeded BOD bottles, [b] DO [a] Seeded BOD bottles, [b] DO and pH measurementand pH measurement

Page 11: MethaneDigester Design

Chemical Oxygen Demand Chemical Oxygen Demand AnalysisAnalysis

Page 12: MethaneDigester Design

[a] Centrifuge Tubes, [b] Bio-Rad [a] Centrifuge Tubes, [b] Bio-Rad Bradford Kit, [c] Standard Cuvettes, [d] Bradford Kit, [c] Standard Cuvettes, [d]

Sample CuvettesSample Cuvettes

Page 13: MethaneDigester Design

Methanotrophs Plate Count Methanotrophs Plate Count AnalysisAnalysis

Page 14: MethaneDigester Design

Methanotrophs Plate Count Methanotrophs Plate Count AnalysisAnalysis

Page 15: MethaneDigester Design

Initial experimental conditions of Initial experimental conditions of the selected three media the selected three media

32408876Biomass density (g/ m3)

17256457BOD status of filter (mg/L)

12236264842COD status of filter (mg/L)

3.4×10-33.4×10-33.4×10-3Methane mass flow rate (g/m3/hr)

1310183568Bulk density of filter (kg/ m3)

0.1150.1150.115Biofilter volume (m3)

0.0440.4140.372Moisture content (cm3/cm3)

505050Packed bed depth (cm)

2.702.702.70Methane supply concentration (%)

SandSawdustCompostDescription of parameters

Page 16: MethaneDigester Design

Fig. 5.2: Specific capacity of methane digestion in different materials

y = -0.7886x + 33.03

y = -0.2992x + 21.43

y = -0.2677x + 20.685

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Time period (week)

Sp. m

etha

ne d

iges

tion

(g/m

3/hr

)

Linear (Compost)

Linear (Saw dust)

Linear (Sand)

Page 17: MethaneDigester Design

Fig. 5.3: Trends of temperature rise in different biofilters wrt inlet temperature

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

20.7 21.1 21.8 19 17.7 21.2 18.7 21.6 21 19.9 20.7

Inlet temperature (0C)

Filte

r bed

tem

p (

0C

)

TempCompost TempSaw dust TempSand

Page 18: MethaneDigester Design

Fig. 5.4: Relationship between methane digestion and temperature rise in different biofilters

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

1 20.0

25 29 27 25 22 24 22 23 21 20 21

28 30 31 25 24 28 24 24 22 22 22

27 35 36 27 26 30 26 26 24 24 23

Filter beds temperature ( 0C)

Met

hane

dig

estio

n (

%)

DigestionCompost DigestionSaw dust DigestionSand

Page 19: MethaneDigester Design

Fig. 5.6: Methane digestion Vs moisture content in the Sawdust medium

y = 233.15x2 - 140.78x + 75.629

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

0.360 0.380 0.400 0.420 0.440 0.460 0.480 0.500 0.520

Volumetric moisture content (m3/m 3)

Met

hane

Dig

estio

n (%

)

Poly. (Saw dust)

Page 20: MethaneDigester Design

Fig. 5.8: Trends of biomass contents at different filter media

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Time period (week)

Biom

ass (

g/m

3)

Compost

Saw dust

Sand

Page 21: MethaneDigester Design

Fig. 5.10: Relationship between biomass contents and methane digestion rates in sawdust filter

y = 631.31x-0.7693

R2 = 0.8938

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

17.0 21.4 23.3 18.9 19.0 24.2 19.2 22.8 21.3 17.8 14.4

Methane digestion rate (g/m 3/hr)

Biom

ass c

onten

t (g/m

3)

Saw dust

Pow er (Saw dust)

Page 22: MethaneDigester Design

Fig. 5.11: Relationship between biomass contents and methane digestion rates in sand filter

y = 40.477x-0.1626

R2 = 0.9088

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

19.9 21.2 21.8 19.5 18.9 19.7 17.3 18.9 19.5 21.1 14.9

Methane digestion rate (g/m 3/hr)

Biom

ass c

onten

t (g/m

3)

Sand

Pow er (Sand)

Page 23: MethaneDigester Design

Fig. 5.13: Trends of BOD removal status in different filter media

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Time period (week)

BOD

stat

us (m

g/L)

Compost

Sawdust

Sand

Power (Compost)

Power (Sawdust)

Power (Sand)

Page 24: MethaneDigester Design

Fig. 5.12: Trends of COD removal status in different filter media

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Time period (week)

COD

stat

us (m

g/L)

Compost

Sawdust

Sand

Power (Compost)

Power (Sawdust)

Power (Sand)

Page 25: MethaneDigester Design

0

50

100

150

200

250

Bacte

rial p

opula

tion

(104) 0

12

45

67

89Compost Saw dust Sand

Time period (week)

Fig. 5.14: Trends of bacterial population at different filter media

Compost

Saw dust

Sand

Page 26: MethaneDigester Design

ConclusionConclusion

The methane digestion efficiency in the sawdust The methane digestion efficiency in the sawdust medium was 60% with the biomass content of medium was 60% with the biomass content of 238 g/m3 while the compost medium had 86% 238 g/m3 while the compost medium had 86% with 539 g/m3 biomass. with 539 g/m3 biomass.

The overall results indicated that the sawdust The overall results indicated that the sawdust material can be used for minimizing methane material can be used for minimizing methane transfer rate from the landfilltransfer rate from the landfill..

The digestions efficiency in the sawdust could be The digestions efficiency in the sawdust could be accelerated by incorporating necessary nutrients accelerated by incorporating necessary nutrients in the beginning of the experimentin the beginning of the experiment..