Legally Binding Outcome Copenhagen_Briefing _16 Nov09
Click here to load reader
Transcript of Legally Binding Outcome Copenhagen_Briefing _16 Nov09
1
Howtodefineandsecureafair,ambitiousandlegallybindingoutcomefromCopenhagen
• Copenhagenhastobetheplaceandthemomenttostrikeadealonthefair,ambitiousand
bindinglegalagreementuponwhichcommitmentsbyallPartiesmustrestinordertosecurethesurvivalofcountries,culturesandecosystems.
• Achievingthisisprimarilyuptoindustrializedcountries,whoneedtounlockkeyroadblocks.
• PoliticalagreementsreachedonthekeyissuesneedtobecapturedalreadyinCopenhagenaslegaltextofalegalinstrumentthatwillrequireratification.
• HavingonlyasetofseparateCOPandCMPdecisionsasanoutcomefromCopenhagenwouldbeunacceptable.
• Keyactorsintheprocess,includingtheupcomingDanishCOPpresidencymustchangetheircurrentstrategiesandstartpursuingalegallybindingoutcomefromCopenhagen.
• ThemandateofthePreCOPtotheCOPPresidencyandKPandLCAchairsmustbetofacilitateadoptionoflegalinstrument(s)inCopenhagen.
WhatisattheheartofthepoliticalstruggleforCopenhagen?InBarcelonaYvoDeBoeroutlinedhisplanfortheCopenhagenoutcome,suggestingthattherewasn’tenoughtimetocompleteatreatyortreatiesanymore.However,itisclearthatthisplanBconsistingofanelaboratelistofCOPdecisionsandannexeswouldrequirenolessworkortime.Inrealitywhatislackingistrustamongparties.HeadsofStatesandministersmustensureasaprioritythatCOP15resolvesthekeyunderlyingconflicts.OtherwisetheCopenhagenoutcomeaswellasanyprocessfollowingfromitwillbedoomedtofail.
1) Avoidingcatastrophicclimatechangeisnotpossibleunlessallbigemitterscommittoambitiousaction.However,thedifferentiatedresponsibilitiesmustremainclear.Industrializedcountriesmusttaketheirfairshareoftheglobaleffortrequiredtostaywellbelow2degreeswarmingandagreeontheirQuantifiedEmissionReductionCommitments,guidedbytheViennaUNFCCCconclusionstheyadoptedtwoyearsago.1Thiswillenablemajordevelopingcountriestobringtheirambitiousdomesticactionsunderalegallybindingtreaty.
2) InordertosecuretheKyotoProtocolanditsarchitecture,theIndustrializedcountriesthathaveratifiedtheKyotoProtocolmusttakeonasecondcommitmentperiod,andtheUnitedStatesmusttakeoncommitmentsthatarecomparableinambitionandlegalnaturetothoseoftheKyotoratifyers,inordertoensurethateffortsamongindustrializedcountriesarecomparable.
1 Atthe4thsessionoftheAWG‐KPinViennaAugust2007PartiesrecognisedthatachievingIPCC’sloweststabilisationlevelswouldrequireAnnexIPartiesasagrouptoreduceemissionsinarangeof25–40percentbelow1990levelsby2020.Theyalsonotedthatthisrangedoesnottakeintoaccountlifestylechangesorwideruseofflexibilitymechanismswhichbothhavepotentialofincreasingthereductionrange.PartiesconsideredthatthisrangeprovidesusefulinitialparametersfortheoveralllevelofambitionofAnnexItargets,andthatitwouldbereviewedinthelightofotherinformation,suchasonlower(than450ppm)stabilizationscenarios.Online:http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2007/awg4/eng/04.pdf
2
3) Faststartfinanceisnotenough.Vulnerablecountriesarealreadyforcedtoadapttoproblemstheydidn’tcause,andpayingahighpriceforitbothinmonetarytermsandwiththeirhomesandlives.Whileimmediatefundingisimportant,Copenhagenneedstounlockthefundamentalissuesrelatedtolong‐termfinancesolutions,namelythescale,assessedcontributions,innovativesources,governanceanddisbursementofindustrializedcountries’financecommitments.Thismoneyneedstobenewandadditional,andbecommittedandprovidedontopofdevelopedcountries’aidtargets(0.7%ODA)including,tosupportmitigationandadaptationandalsosolutionsthataddressinsurance,lossanddamage.
Onceagreementhasbeenfoundonthesekeymatters,agreementontheglobalambitionandotherfundamentalmattersincludingthelegalformoftheagreedoutcomecanbefound.Hence,whatisneededisnotmoretimebutpoliticalwill.Whatdefinesacomprehensiveandlegallybindingoutcome?InCopenhagenHeadsofStatesandministershavetosecureclarityonthefollowingkeyaspectsofacomprehensive,legallybindingoutcome:1)Resolveallcrunchissues:CometoagreementonallsubstantiveandlegalissuesoftheBaliActionPlan.
• TheCopenhagenoutcomehastoincludefullclarityontheglobalambition,mitigationfordevelopedcountries(economywidetargetsandlongtermplans)anddevelopingcountries(actionsandlongtermplans),financeandtechnologysupport(level,sources,institutions),andtheadaptation,REDD,andmaritime/aviationframeworksaswellasthebasicarchitectureforimplementation,thecomplianceregimeforindustrializedcountries(buildingontheKyotosystem)andfacilitationmechanismsfordevelopingcountries.
• Itneedstocoverasufficientlevelofdetailonintentionsandoutcome,soastonotallowforex‐postnegotiationthatcreatesloopholesweakeningtheagreedambition.
• Anyimportantunresolvedissuesmustnotbepostponed,astheywouldbesidelinediftheywerenotpartofthepackagedeal.
2)AgreementonwhateachPartyislegallycommittedtodo:ThisincludesthetypeandlevelofcommitmentofeachParty,decisionsoverthesystemofmeasuring,reportingandverificationofmitigationandfinancecommitmentsandactions,theroleofcomplianceandenforcement,includinginternationalstandardsforaccountingandcommitments,allofwhicharekeytotheinternationalarchitecture.Commitmentsthatequateonlyto“pledgeandreview”havelittlecredibilityandarenotacceptable.3)Agreementonthelegalfoundationandarchitecture:ThelegalfoundationoftheagreementneedstobedecidedinCopenhagen,namelybygivingclarityonwhichlegalinstrument(s)willbindpartiestotheircommitments.Importantly,theagreementonsubstanceneedstobecapturedintheformoftreatytext.ThelegaloutcomemustbuildonandenhancetheKyotoProtocolandtheConvention,butnotreplacethem.4)Anagreementthatcannotbereopened:TheobjectivehastobethattheagreementstruckinCopenhagenisnotopenforrenegotiation,onlyopentofurtherrefinementthatstrengthensthelegalagreement.Thismeansthatalso“entry‐in‐to‐force”languagewillbeimportanttoinclude.
3
Thereisnoconvincingargumenttobefoundastowhypostponinganyoftheaboveissuesbyhalfayearormorewouldinanywayincreasethelikelihoodofgettingabetteroutcome.HowtolockpoliticalagreementintolegalformAdoptionofprotocol(s)inCopenhagen:Themostsecure,legally&politicallysoundoutcomeofCopenhagenistheadoptionofthepoliticalagreementinformofratifiableandcompletetreatytextofalegalinstrument.Perourproposalfortheappropriateoveralllegalformthiswouldbealinkedtwo‐Protocoloutcome,consistingofanamendedKyotoProtocolandanewCopenhagenProtocol,accompaniedbyasetofCOPandCMPdecisions.Thisaddressesthecurrentpoliticalsituationbest(whilerecognizingtwoparallelinstrumentswouldproposesomelegalchallenges).Ifnecessary,detailscouldbefinalisedinformofCOPdecisionsduring2010.WhatwouldbeanunacceptableoutcomeofCopenhagenLeavingCopenhagenwithonlyapoliticaldeclarationorCOPdecision(s)wouldbeagravewasteofthemomentumoftheCopenhagenprocess,andanunacceptableoutcome.Thesameistrueforanylanguagethatleavesopenthequestionofwhatcountriesarecommittedto,orwhatthelegalnatureoftheircommitmentsare,TheDanishPresidencyisaimingfora“Copenhagenpoliticalagreement”withseriesof“politicalcommitments”,suggestingthatkeyfundamentalscouldbecapturedintolegalformonlyafterCopenhagen.Thisisarecipeforalongprocesswithunclearresults,whichwouldalsoriskthewholeKyotoProtocolwithitsarchitecture.Thisoptioniswaytooweakasaframeworkforafutureclimateregime.Itmustbetakenoffthetable.CountriescanandmustsolveallkeyissuesinCopenhagenandcapturetheagreementsintheframeworkoflegalinstrumentsunderboththeLCAandtheKP.TheuniquemomentumofCopenhagenmustbefullyutilizedtobreakthedeadlockVerystrongpoliticalmomentumhasbeenbuiltuparoundtheCopenhagensummit.Thousandsofjournalistsandtensofthousandsofengagedcitizenswillbepresenttowitnessworldleaderstomakethebreakthroughtheyhavepromisedonclimatechange.Itiscrucialtomakefulluseofthismoment,toreachdecisionsandtoexpresstheminlegaltextthatleavesnoroomforreinterpretationafterwards.Verycruciallythisappliesalsotothesharedvisionthatmustnotbefudgedintoapoliticaldeclaration.Thesharedvision,capturedinlegaltextunderbothtrackoutcomes,iswhattheworlddesperatelyneeds,recognisingtherighttosurvivalofallcultures,committingtokeepoverallwarmingasfarbelow2degreesaspossible,withaviewofreturningtobelow1.5Cassoonaspossible,andconsequentlypeakingglobalemissionsbetween2013‐2017andcapturingmainagreementsofallBaliActionBuildingblocks.NotagreeingtoalegallybindingoutcomeasdefinedinthisbriefingcanbeequatedwithPartiesnothavingmanagedtosolvethecrunchissuesthatmaintaingravemistrust.Currently,unlockingtheseissuesismainlyuptoindustrialisedcountries.Everyyearofdelaywillcostlives,butalsoeconomicallossesworthof500blnUSDperyearintheenergysectoralone,asassessedbytheIEA.