Labour presentation handout
-
Upload
christopher-mehigan -
Category
Documents
-
view
367 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Labour presentation handout
![Page 1: Labour presentation handout](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082607/55995b971a28abdc0a8b4733/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Background to 20072002 election performance was poor. The critical
decision for Labour Party strategists was whether to
at tempt an aggressive st rategy of market
development by appealing beyond its existing base to
challenge either the market leader (Fianna Fáil) or to
challenge its main rival for the role of challenger (Fine
Gael). The other option, which it chose, was the more
conservative strategy of seeking greater market
penetration.
The party strategists calculated that the potential of
its existing policies had not been exhausted and
judged that better vote management through a formal
pact with Fine Gael would maximise support. This
was in direct contrast to the 2002 strategy when it
adopted a more independent line and viewed formal
alliances as problematic. Labour strategists felt this
new strategy reflected voters assessment that in
practice there was no choice but Fianna Fáil
Before 2004 local elections, Pat Rabbitte had
approved a vote transfer pact with Fine Gael and this
was extended in the ‘Mullingar Accord’ in 2005. The
strategy was formulated to emphasise a clear
electable alternative to Fianna Fáil.
Strategy and CampaignCandidate SelectionThe Labour Party adopted a more centralised
candidate selection process through the Labour
Party’s Organisational Subcommittee (OSC). The
OSC would recommend the number of candidates for
selection at a convention. In addition the OSC
Chairperson and Party Leader could also add
candidates to the ticket once the election was called.
This occurred in Dublin South where Aidan Culhane
won the selection at convention, but Alex White was
nonetheless added to the ticket.
Working with the OSC, Labour established a
committee led by Dick Spring in 2005 to devise a
candidate strategy. The committee recommended
one-candidate tickets in most cases with exceptions
in seven constituencies where two candidates were
run in each. Notably this was the first time that
Labour ran candidates in every constituency since
1969. This had been attempted in 2002 but was not
successful due to lack of suitable candidates.
Notably none of the sitting Labour TD’s were
challenged.
0
5
10
15
20
TD Senator Councillor Electoral Experience New
Labour Candidates in terms of Political Experience
Political Marketing Labour Party 2007 General Election
Christopher Mehigan · MA Public Affairs & Political Communication · April 12, 2010 · Pg 1 of 3
![Page 2: Labour presentation handout](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082607/55995b971a28abdc0a8b4733/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
This conservative approach to candidate selection
evidenced by not challenging any of the sitting TD’s is
further reflected in the breakdown of the political
experience of the Labour Party candidates. Only 5
out of the 50 candidates were new to the process. 40
of the candidates were either sitting TD’s, Senators or
local Councillors.
Communication ObjectivesSteps taken to outline a shared vision as well as clear
goals and responsibilities for the new alliance. In a
subsequent review of the media coverage of the
election campaign it emerged that Fine Gael Leader
Enda Kenny, and the Labour Party Leader Pat
Rabbitte were almost identical in terms of time and
effort invested in each topic. This shows that both
par t i es were cons is ten t l y on message in
communicating the vision, goals and responsibilities
of the campaign.
Particular effort was made to win the backing of party
members and to build a plan for realistic and
proportionate gains and risk-sharing. Labour
presented the strategy internally as a vehicle for
achieving more of its objectives, as it was the author
of more of the policies in the agreed programme and
its ranks contained more senior political figures with
ministerial experience - an important asset when
competence was being stressed. For its traditional
supporters it characterised the strategy as ensuring a
framework for a centre-left government to replace the
centre-right one in place.
Messaging was consistent, clear, and concise. Focus
was on the qualities and experience of the Labour
party and their candidates more so than particular
Economy Health EducationCrime Tax Housing
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Enda Kenny Pat Rabbitte
8%9%
14%14%
7%9%
12%8%
23%26%
12%11%
Media Coverage of 2007 Election Campaignpolicies. Labour was presented as a key element in a
change of government.
Campaign AnalysisCampaign Characteristics
1. No substantial revision of policies, relied instead
on existing policies.
2. Conservative candidate selection, although more
far reaching than previously.
3. Focus on communicating an elective alternative to
government.
4. Convincing public this is the right choice.
Applying the Lees Marshment theory of political
marketing to this leads us to conclude that the
political campaign best describes that of a Sales
Oriented Party. According to Lees Marshment the
characteristics of a political marketing campaign run
by a Sales Oriented Party include:
Christopher Mehigan · MA Public Affairs & Political Communication · April 12, 2010 · Pg 2 of 3
![Page 3: Labour presentation handout](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082607/55995b971a28abdc0a8b4733/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
1977 1981 1982 (Feb) 1982 (Nov) 1987 1989 1992 1997 2002 2007
16 15 15 16
1215
33
1720 20
11.6%9.9% 9.1% 9.4%
6.5%9.5%
19.5%
10.4% 10.8% 10.1%
Labour Party Performance 1977 - 2007
• Attempt to persuade voters by using market
communication.
• Focus on selling, using hard persuasive techniques
that may mask weakness or problem areas. (Such
as the incompatibility of conflicting FG / Lab
policies)
• Try to make the voters want it, and what it offers,
rather than change its behaviour to suit what the
voters want. (Didn’t change, but tried to make
voters opt for an alternative government to FF)
• Research for advert isement and message
generation, but not product (candidate or policy)
design. (Conservative candidate selection, no
substantive policy reform)
% vote
Change since 2002
Seats Change since 2002
Fianna Fáil 41.6% +0.1% 77 -4
Fine Gael 27.3% +4.8% 51 +20
Labour 10.1% -0.6% 20 0
Green Party 4.7% +0.8% 6 0
Sinn Féin 6.9% +0.4% 4 -1
Prog. Democrats
2.7% -1.2% 2 -6
Others 6.7% -4.3% 5 -8
Total 100.0% 0 165 0
2007 ResultUnfortunately for Labour, the strategy of teaming with
Fine Gael appeared to benefit Fine Gael more so than
Labour.
Labour’s PerformanceMuch the same as the previous elections of the past
30 years.
Over the ten elections during the period 1977-2007,
Labour’s vote fell outside the 9-12 per cent band (and
its seats outside the band of 15 - 21, only twice. In
1987 it plunged to 6% of the vote, reducing seats to
12, and in 1992 it raised the vote share to 19 per cent
and won 33 seats. The remarkable stability suggests
a party that has found its level within the party
system, or, some would say, is stuck in a rut.
Upon taking over as leader in the late summer of
2007, Eamon Gilmore emphasised continuity of
philosophy, improved organisation and better
presentation of Labour’s existing values and policies
rather than a more fundamental reassessment.
Labours performance was neither bad enough to
prompt a root and branch self examination nor good
enough to lift it into the top division.
Vote Share Seats
Christopher Mehigan · MA Public Affairs & Political Communication · April 12, 2010 · Pg 3 of 3