Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Nov 2010.
-
Upload
octavia-amber-gibson -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
3
Transcript of Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Nov 2010.
• The Requirements Environment• Sequence of events
– Analysis– Initial Documentation– Transitions to actions that provide solutions
• Non-Materiel solutions• JCIDS interactions with developing materiel
solutions• Requirements Approval structure
Developing Requirements
2
The Requirements Environment
Finding the balance between:COCOM near-term
requirements to support CONPLANs and current
missions
andServices’ long range vision & investment
plans
Versatile, joint systems and
Growing demandsFiscal & political
constraintsand
Systems optimized for service missions
Geographic specificity and Worldwide applicability
Ambitious requirements Achievable acquisition strategy
and
Quantity matters High-end capabilitiesand
3
JCIDS-Tab 2
• LRIP• FOT&E
• Affordable military-useful increment
• Technology demonstrated
• Initial KPPs/KSAs
• TEMP• SEP
MS “B”
• Revise KPPs/KSAs
• Detailed design
• System integration
• TEMP• DT&E
MS “C”
Develop, Test & Produce
MS “A”
Evolutionary Acquisition
Materiel Solution Analysis
Technology Development
Engineering & Manufacturing Development
Production & Deployment
CDD CPD
• Capabilities• Tasks• Attributes• Metrics
• Gaps• Shortfalls• Redundancies• Risk areas
• Non-materiel solutions
• Potential Materiel approaches
• S&T initiatives• Experimentation
SECDEF
Select JointIntegrating Concept
• GDF• Defense
Planning Scenarios
• Family of Concepts
• Transforma-tion
oversight
activity
Capabilities-Based Assessment
PolicyCapabilities Definition
Develop CONOPS
COCOM
OSD (AT&L)
COCOMs
USMC
Army
Navy
Air Force
DIA
OSD (NII)
OSD (PA&E)
FCB
Capabilities-Based Assessment
Select Materiel Solution
JCIDS and Acquisition
• LRIP• IOT&E
MaterielDevelopmentDecision
ServicesOSD/JCS
• Analysis of Alternatives
• Technology Development Strategy
• Test & Eval Strategy
• SoS System Engineering
ICD
OSD (AT&L, CAPE), Services and OSD (DOT&E) -- Joint Staff (JROC)
Analysis ofAlternatives
CompetitivePrototyping
Joint Staff / Joint Requirements Oversight Council / OSD
Getting the front end right is key
4
JCIDS-Tab 2
Capabilities-Based Assessment
NEEDS
GAPS
SOLUTIONS
ExistingGuidance
The problemsand the risks
What we need for the mission
What should wedo about it?
Where does this need rank?
How soon do we need it?
JCIDS Review
5
• CBA Recommendations:– Transformational solutions– Evolution of existing capabilities– Information technology solutions
• Information for an Analysis of Alternatives (AoA)• Managers must communicate to avoid disconnects
over seams between JCIDS, DAS, and PPBE
• CBA Documentation:– Initial Capabilities Document– DOTmLPF Change Recommendation
Identifying Needs and Potential Solutions
6
CBA Output Documents
• Initial Capabilities Document (MS A)– Documents Capabilities-Based Assessment (CBA)
Results – specifically Capability Gaps– Identifies relevant operational performance
attributes– Documents the recommendation on the need for a
materiel solution and potential non-material solutions
– Predecessor for the Capabilities Development Document
– Key review question: How to prioritize warfighting gaps?
7
Operational Performance Attributes
• Attributes necessary to design a proposed system• Establish a performance baseline• Guide development and demonstration• Guide development of Key Performance Parameters
(KPPs) for inclusion in Capabilities Development Document
8
CBA Output Documents
• Joint DCR – DOTmLPF Change Request– When DoD Decides a Joint Non- Materiel Solution is
appropriate– Non-Materiel Solutions
• Change policy• Change doctrine• Reorganize• Train and educate DOD personnel differently• Acquire commercial or non-developmental items• Acquire more quantities of existing items• Add or reassign personnel• Move or realign facilities
– Sometimes Called DOT_LPF
9
• LRIP• FOT&E
• Affordable military-useful increment
• Technology demonstrated
• Initial KPPs/KSAs
• TEMP• SEP
MS “B”
• Revise KPPs/KSAs
• Detailed design
• System integration
• TEMP• DT&E
MS “C”
Develop, Test & Produce
MS “A”
Evolutionary Acquisition
Materiel Solution Analysis
Technology Development
Engineering & Manufacturing Development
Production & Deployment
CDD CPD
• Capabilities• Tasks• Attributes• Metrics
• Gaps• Shortfalls• Redundancies• Risk areas
• Non-materiel solutions
• Potential Materiel approaches
• S&T initiatives• Experimentation
SECDEF
Select JointIntegrating Concept
• GDF• Defense
Planning Scenarios
• Family of Concepts
• Transforma-tion
oversight
activity
Capabilities-Based Assessment
PolicyCapabilities Definition
Develop CONOPS
COCOM
OSD (AT&L)
COCOMs
USMC
Army
Navy
Air Force
DIA
OSD (NII)
OSD (PA&E)
FCB
Capabilities-Based Assessment
Select Materiel Solution
JCIDS and Acquisition
• LRIP• IOT&E
MaterielDevelopmentDecision
ServicesOSD/JCS
COCOM/Service
Near-term Capabilities
As part of the agile process
IPLs, OCO, DCRs, JCTDs, JUONs, etc.
PPBE (PDM, PBD)
JRAC
• Analysis of Alternatives
• Technology Development Strategy
• Test & Eval Strategy
• SoS System Engineering
ICD
OSD (AT&L, CAPE), Services and OSD (DOT&E) -- Joint Staff (JROC)
Analysis ofAlternatives
CompetitivePrototyping
Joint Staff / Joint Requirements Oversight Council / OSD
10
Key JCIDS Development Documents
• Capability Development Document (MS B)– Defines Performance Requirements to Achieve the
Capability• Identifies KPPs, KSAs, and additional attributes• Attributes should be Authoritative, Measurable and Testable
– Describes DOTMLPF and Policy Constraints associated with the solution
– May describe multiple increments– Provides operational capabilities for the acquisition
strategy and the Acquisition Program Baseline (APB)– Insert all CDD KPPs and Sustainment KSAs verbatim into
the APB
11
• Attributes or characteristics of a system• Critical or essential
– To develop an effective military capability– To make a significant contribution to the characteristics of the
future joint force• KPPs must be testable
– Enable feedback from T&E• Mandatory vs. Selectively applied KPPs
– Net Ready KPP, Sustainment KPP– Training KPP, Energy Efficiency KPP
• Validated by the JROC for JROC interest documents• Failure to meet a KPP results in reevaluation or reassessment
of the program
Key Performance Parameters (KPPs)
12
Key System Attributes (KSAs)
• Attributes most critical or essential• Not selected as a KPP• An additional level of capability prioritization below
the KPP• Only senior leadership can change a KSA
– Sponsor 4-star– Defense Agency Commander– Principal Staff Assistant
13
JCIDS-Tab 2
• LRIP• FOT&E
• Affordable military-useful increment
• Technology demonstrated
• Initial KPPs/KSAs
• TEMP• SEP
MS “B”
• Revise KPPs/KSAs
• Detailed design
• System integration
• TEMP• DT&E
MS “C”
Develop, Test & Produce
MS “A”
Evolutionary Acquisition
Materiel Solution Analysis
Technology Development
Engineering & Manufacturing Development
Production & Deployment
CDD CPD
• Capabilities• Tasks• Attributes• Metrics
• Gaps• Shortfalls• Redundancies• Risk areas
• Non-materiel solutions
• Potential Materiel approaches
• S&T initiatives• Experimentation
SECDEF
Select JointIntegrating Concept
• GDF• Defense
Planning Scenarios
• Family of Concepts
• Transforma-tion
oversight
activity
Capabilities-Based Assessment
PolicyCapabilities Definition
Develop CONOPS
COCOM
OSD (AT&L)
COCOMs
USMC
Army
Navy
Air Force
DIA
OSD (NII)
OSD (PA&E)
FCB
Capabilities-Based Assessment
Select Materiel Solution
• LRIP• IOT&E
MaterielDevelopmentDecision
ServicesOSD/JCS
COCOM/Service
Near-term Capabilities
As part of the agile process
IPLs, OCO, DCRs, JCTDs, JUONs, etc.
PPBE (PDM, PBD)
JRAC
• Analysis of Alternatives
• Technology Development Strategy
• Test & Eval Strategy
• SoS System Engineering
ICD
OSD (AT&L, CAPE), Services and OSD (DOT&E) -- Joint Staff (JROC)
Analysis ofAlternatives
CompetitivePrototyping
Joint Staff / Joint Requirements Oversight Council / OSD
JCIDS and Acquisition
14
Key JCIDS Development Documents
• Capability Production Document (MS C)– Supports Production and Development of one
increment– Documents Authoritative, Testable Capabilities – Support Production, Testing, and Deployment
• May describe Incremental Production and Deployment
– No New Requirements– Must meet Operational Performance Attributes
15
JCIDS-Tab 2
• LRIP• FOT&E
• Affordable military-useful increment
• Technology demonstrated
• Initial KPPs/KSAs
• TEMP• SEP
MS “B”
• Revise KPPs/KSAs
• Detailed design
• System integration
• TEMP• DT&E
MS “C”
Develop, Test & Produce
MS “A”
Evolutionary Acquisition
Materiel Solution Analysis
Technology Development
Engineering & Manufacturing Development
Production & Deployment
CDD CPD
• Capabilities• Tasks• Attributes• Metrics
• Gaps• Shortfalls• Redundancies• Risk areas
• Non-materiel solutions
• Potential Materiel approaches
• S&T initiatives• Experimentation
SECDEF
Select JointIntegrating Concept
• GDF• Defense
Planning Scenarios
• Family of Concepts
• Transforma-tion
oversight
activity
Capabilities-Based Assessment
PolicyCapabilities Definition
Develop CONOPS
COCOM
OSD (AT&L)
COCOMs
USMC
Army
Navy
Air Force
DIA
OSD (NII)
OSD (PA&E)
FCB
Capabilities-Based Assessment
Select Materiel Solution
• LRIP• IOT&E
MaterielDevelopmentDecision
ServicesOSD/JCS
COCOM/Service
Near-term Capabilities
As part of the agile process
IPLs, OCO, DCRs, JCTDs, JUONs, etc.
PPBE (PDM, PBD)
JRAC
• Analysis of Alternatives
• Technology Development Strategy
• Test & Eval Strategy
• SoS System Engineering
ICD
OSD (AT&L, CAPE), Services and OSD (DOT&E) -- Joint Staff (JROC)
Analysis ofAlternatives
CompetitivePrototyping
Joint Staff / Joint Requirements Oversight Council / OSD
JCIDS and Acquisition
16
JCIDS-Tab 2
Differences Between the CDD and the CPD
CDD CPD
Focus on Design Focus on Production
All Increments A Specific Increment
KPPs to Help Evaluate Alternative Designs
KPPs Refined and Tailored to the Proposed System
17
JCIDS-Tab 2
JCB
JROCJROC
CJCSCJCS
FCB WG
FCB
ADVICE TO SECDEF
RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL/
FINAL DECISION AUTHORITY
TOP LEVEL GUIDANCE
ISSUE DEVELOPMENT
ANALYTIC FOUNDATION
INITIAL ISSUE REVIEW
JROC DECISION CHAIN
JROC: Joint Requirements Oversight CouncilJCB: Joint Capabilities BoardFCB: Functional Capabilities BoardFCB WG: Functional Capabilities Board Working Group
JROC MEMBERSHIP
Chair: VCJCS
Council Members:
• Vice Chief of Staff, Army
• Vice Chief of Naval Operations
• Vice Chief of Staff, Air Force
• Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps
COCOMs must be consulted and have a standing invitation to attend all JROC sessions; AT&L, CAPE, and Comptroller attend as JROC advisors
Requirements Decision Chain
18
JCIDS-Tab 2
JCB
JROCJROC
CJCSCJCS
FCB WG
FCB
ADVICE TO SECDEF
RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL/
FINAL DECISION AUTHORITY
TOP LEVEL GUIDANCE
ISSUE DEVELOPMENT
ANALYTIC FOUNDATION
INITIAL ISSUE REVIEW
JROC DECISION CHAIN
JROC: Joint Requirements Oversight CouncilJCB: Joint Capabilities BoardFCB: Functional Capabilities BoardFCB WG: Functional Capabilities Board Working Group
JROC MEMBERSHIP
Chair: VCJCS
Council Members:
• Vice Chief of Staff, Army
• Vice Chief of Naval Operations
• Vice Chief of Staff, Air Force
• Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps
COCOMs have a standing invitation toattend all JROC sessions. CAPE, AT&L and Comptroller are formal advisors
JROC Organization
19
JCIDS-Tab 2
Functional Capability Boards
Command & Control
LogisticsBattlespace Awareness
Force Application
Net-Centric BuildingPartnerships
Force Support
Protection
ASD NII/ DOD CIO OSD(P)D, CAPE DOT&EDIA Rep (Threat)ODNI/IRB Other DoD Agencies as necessary
FCB Membership: (O-6 level – not all-inclusive)ServicesCombatant Command RepsOSD (AT&L)OSD (I)Comptroller
20
JCIDS-Tab 2
• Perform an initial review of all JCIDS proposals• Support provided by J6, J8, FCB WGs
• The Gatekeeper will determine: • Joint Potential Designator
• JROC Interest• JCB Interest• Joint Integration• Joint Information• Independent
• Lead and supporting Functional Capabilities Boards
• Formal Staffing begins after Gatekeeper decisions
JCIDS Gatekeeper
21
JCIDS-Tab 2
JCIDS Tracks
Joint Integration
Joint Information
Independent
Staffing Certification
Staffing
SponsorSponsor
SponsorSponsor
SponsorSponsor
JROC Interest
Staffing FCB Review JCB JROCJROC
ACAT I proposals
ACAT II & III proposals requiring certifications only
JCB Interest Staffing
FCB Review JCBJCB
ACAT II & III proposals requiring a joint review
ACAT II & III proposals with multi-component interest
ACAT II & III component unique proposals
Tripwires FCB Review JCB JROCJROC
ACAT I programs with 10% cost growth
ValidationAuthority
ValidationAuthority
22
• The need for flexible capabilities• Begin with analysis• Analysis leads to action• Non-Materiel solutions
– The DOTMLPF Change Recommendation (DCR)
• Materiel solutions– Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)– Capability Development Document (CDD)– Capability Production Document (CPD)
• Process is under review to improve timeliness and aid in improved acquisition performance
JCIDS Summary
23