Interpersonal Violence Prevention - Children's Safety Network€¦ · •1 male mentor group...
Transcript of Interpersonal Violence Prevention - Children's Safety Network€¦ · •1 male mentor group...
Call (866) 835-7973 to join
Interpersonal Violence PreventionTopic Call #1 Date: July 20th, 2017
Strategy Team Updates
2
Tips
Mute yourself when you’re not talking
This webinar is being recorded
Call (866) 835-7973
for audio
Ask questions in the chat at any time
Download
resources from File
Share pod
This webinar is subject to the CS CoIIN data agreement*
3
IVP Staff & Participants
Bekah Thomas,
M.P.A.
Coordinator
Jen Leonardo, Ph.D.
Improvement Advisor
Team
Rebecca Willmer
Tech Guru
Jane Taylor, EdD
Improvement Advisor
Team
Interpersonal Violence Prevention
8 Strategy Teams
•Florida
•Indiana
•Minnesota
•Missouri
•Nebraska
•Northern Mariana Islands
•Pennsylvania
•Tennessee
4
Call Objectives
• Share Lessons Learned
• Celebrate Success
• Brainstorm Solutions to Challenges
• Make Sure We’re All Still on the Same Page
“The more we share, the more we have.”
-Leonard Nimoy
5
New Resource!Change and Measurement Examples
• Examples of approaches to implementing change ideas and collecting measures
• Summary of who is working on what
• Available on the Topic Pages
6
About This Slide Deck
Please contact us if you need assistance!
What we display Where we get it How you can edit it
Drivers & Change Ideas
Process Measures
Aim Statements
Your online Driver DiagramSubmit, re-submit, or edit
your online Driver Diagram
Description of goals, theory
or approachYour Storyboard E-mail us
Charts
Charts are only generated
for the process measures
selected in your driver
diagram
Select the correct Process
Measures in your driver
diagram
Content of your charts
comes from your monthly
report
Submit or edit your monthly
reports
This information is shared with HRSA MCHB and CS CoIIN Topic Teams
7
Interpersonal Violence PreventionEngagement Metrics CNMI FL IN MN MO NE PA TN Topic Team
Driver Diagram Submitted yes Yes yes Yes Yes Yes yes Yes 100% Reporting
Number of Monthly Reports
Submitted 0 2 0 1 2 1 1 1 75%
Reporting at least
once
Number of PDSAs Submitted 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 38%
Reporting at least
once
Number of Topic Calls
participated in 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1.875 On Average
Assessment Scale NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA On Average
This and the following information is up to date as of July 13th, 2017
8
Process Measures Selected
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Interpersonal Violence Prevention Process Measures
CNMI Florida Indiana Minnesota Missouri Nebraska Pennsylvania Tennessee
9
Florida Ages 0-19AIM:
• Deaths: -5%
• Hospitalizations: -5%
• ED Visits: -5%
Interpersonal Violence Prevention
Change Ideas
PD1.SD1.CI3: Social Norms Change
PD2.SD1.CI2: School Safety Committees
PD3.SD2.CI1: Culturally Appropriate Resources
PD3.SD2.CI2: Educating Family and Youth
Process Measures
2. % of organizations that adopt
practices to address
health/developmental needs of
children and support families
3. % of active stakeholders partnering
with the state or in a state coalition
9. % of children and youth receiving EB
SEL, positive youth development, and
non-violence skills
13. # of organizations that offer
training in EB treatment modalities for
IPV
Priority age populations: child abuse prevention of
children ages 0-10, and dating/sexual violence
prevention, ages 14-18.
The team will focus on the evidence-based
bystander intervention strategy, Green Dot,
currently in year two of implementation in seven
communities and seven high schools throughout
the state. The community strategy version
includes a child abuse prevention component and
the high school strategy focuses on teen dating
violence and sexual violence prevention through
promotion of norms that encourage a shared
responsibility for the safety of children.
10
Indiana AIM:
• Deaths: -5%
• Hospitalization: -5%
• ED Visits: -5%
Determine the quality of protocols and
training for the identification and prevention
of interpersonal violence that are being used
by health care sites and increase the
percentage of staff that receive training.
Identify evidence-based bullying prevention
resources and provide these resources to all
health care sites.
Interpersonal Violence Prevention
Change Ideas: Mapped from Cohort 1
PD2.SD1.CI5: RPE
PD2.SD1.CI1: Access to Crisis Centers
PD2.SD2.CI1: Service Provider Training on
Identification, Assessment and Referral
PD2.SD2.CI3: Communication protocols among
providers
PD3.SD2.CI1: Culturally Appropriate Resources
PD3.SD2.ci2: Educate Families on Bullying Prevention
Process Measures
1. % of communities that participate in
campaign
7. % of sites implementing evidence-
based parenting programs
10. # of organizations offering
evidence-based curricula or programs
on social and emotional and non-
violence skills
12. % of identified at risk children and
adolescents whose referral results in
follow up care or support
14. # of interpersonal violence
incidents reported by organizations
11
MinnesotaAges 0-4, Abusive Head Trauma
AIM:
• Deaths: -7.5%
• Hospitalizations: -7.5%
• ED Visits:-7.5%
• Understand how OBGYN, Family
Practitioners, and Pediatricians are
educating care givers about AHT
• Understand differences from hospital to
hospital
• Test and measure effectiveness of education
delivered through hospitals and health care
providers.
• Increase the number of times parents are
exposed to AHT education, first at the
hospital upon delivery of the child, followed
up with early childhood visitation.
Interpersonal Violence Prevention
Change Ideas
PD1.SD1.CI1: Educating Policy Makers
PD1.SD2.CI1: Violence Prevention Coalition
PD2.SD2.CI1: Practitioner Training
PD3.SD1.CI1: Parenting Skills
PD3.SD2.CI1: Culturally Appropriate Resources
Process Measures
1. % of communities that participate in
campaign
2. % of organizations that adopt practices
to address health/developmental needs of
children and support families
3. % of active stakeholders partnering with
the state or in a state coalition
7. % of sites implementing evidence-based
parenting programs
11. % of professionals who work with youth
trained in EB identification and referral of
IPV
13. # of organizations that offer training in
EB treatment modalities for IPV
12
Missouri REACTRecognizing Early Actions for Correct Treatment
Ages 10-19AIM:
• Deaths: -3%
• Hospitalizations: -3%
• ED Visits: -3%In Cohort 1, this team worked towards developing online training
modules so all professions have a coordinated evidence-based
screening tool available to assess adult clients’ risk of intimate
partner violence. A survey to home visitors, community health
workers, workers working with youth and school social workers
showed:
• 75% of respondents were associated with Parents as
Teachers (PAT).
• Almost 60% of programs do not use a screening tool
to assess adult clients’ risk of intimate partner
violence.
Interpersonal Violence Prevention
Change Ideas
PD2.SD1.CI3: Expand in-school and after-school
programs
Process Measures
9. % of children and youth
receiving EB SEL, positive youth
development, and non-violence
skills
13
NebraskaIt’s Alright to Cry
AIM:
• Deaths: -7.5%
• Hospitalizations: -7.5%
• ED Visits: -7.5%
By June 2017, Nebraska will increase the percent of
birthing hospitals statewide that adopt SBS/AHT policies by
50% or higher. Nebraska will do this by:
• Researching content for the toolkit, including a sample
model policy statement, updated materials to include a
recommended evidence based program, resource
materials and suggested measurement tool.
• Establish toolkit content
• Create a sample policy
• What does a Hospital Policy for SBS / AHT look
like?
• What does the State Statute want hospitals to
complete?
• What requirements does Nebraska want all birthing
hospitals policies on SBS/AHT in NE to have?
Interpersonal Violence Prevention
Change Ideas
PD1.SD2.CI1: Coalitions
PD3.SD1.CI1: Evidence-based parenting programs
Process Measures
2. % of organizations that adopt
practices to address
health/developmental needs of
children and support families
7. % of sites implementing
evidence-based parenting
programs
14Interpersonal Violence Prevention
Process Measure 2: Percent of organizations adopting rules/practices to address health and
development needs of children and to support families
The Nebraska team found that 48% of respondents to a scan do have official policies in place for
Shaken Baby Syndrome education. These 48% use NE DHHS 83% of the time. The other 17% use the
Period of Purple Crying educational tool. To improve the Abusive Head Trauma education provided at
birthing hospitals, Nebraska is currently developing a toolkit based on model hospital policies.
NebraskaIt’s Alright to Cry
15
Northern Mariana IslandsAIM:
•Death: -5%
•Hospitalization: -7.5%
•ED Visit: -7.5%
Interpersonal Violence Prevention
Change Ideas:
PD1.SD1.CI2: Campaigns
PD1.SD1.CI1: Social Norms Change
PD2.SD1.CI2: School Safety Committees
PD2.SD1.CI3: In-schools and after school
programming
PD2.SD2 (No change Ideas)
PD3.SD1.CI1: Parenting Programs
PD3.SD1.CI3: Social and Emotional Skills
Development
PD3.SD2.CI2: Bullying Prevention
Education
The Northern Mariana Islands will work with
the Public School System to decrease injuries
related to interpersonal violence among
children and adolescents in the jurisdiction.
Process Measures
6. # of pre-school aged children participating
in programs for healthy brain development
and school readiness
7. % of sites implementing evidence-based
parenting programs
8. % of parents and caregivers who participate
in an evidence-based parenting program
9. % of children and youth receiving EB SEL,
positive youth development, and non-violence
skills
10. # of organizations offering evidence-based
curricula or programs on social and emotional
and non-violence skills
16
PennsylvaniaPass the Green Mustaches
AIM:
• Deaths: -7.5%
• Hospitalizations: -7.5%
• ED Visits: -7.5%PA’s work within the CoIIN is linked to its Title V priorities, Action
Plan and current programming work.
Through participation in the CoIIN, PA is also looking to expand
interpersonal violence programming, such as Olweus.
Interpersonal Violence Prevention
Change Ideas
PD1.SD1.CI3: Change Social Norms
PD1.SD2.CI1: Coalitions
PD2.SD1.CI3: In-school and After-school programs
PD2.SD2.CI1: Service Provider Training on Identification,
Assessment and Referral
PD2.SD2.CI3: Protocols for Communication and
Collaboration
PD2.SD2.CI4: Guidelines for assessing and managing risk
PD3.SD1.CI1: Evidence-based parenting program
PD3.SD1.CI2: Training in Non-Violent Skill Resolution
PD3.SD2.CI1: Culturally appropriate resources about
trauma
PD3.SD2.CI2: Increase use of Stopbullying.gov
Process Measures
1. % of communities that
participate in campaign
7. % of sites implementing
evidence-based parenting programs
8. % of parents and caregivers who
participate in an evidence-based
parenting program
9. % of children and youth receiving
EB SEL, positive youth
development, and non-violence
skills
10. # of organizations offering
evidence-based curricula or
programs on social and emotional
and non-violence skills
17Interpersonal Violence Prevention
Process Measure 9: Percent of children and youth receiving EB SEL, positive youth
development, and non-violence skills
Collected quarterly, represents the percentage of youth 9-14 years old who complete at
least 75% of the Healthy Youth PA program.
PennsylvaniaPass the Green Mustaches
18
Tennessee 10-19 year oldsAIM:
• Deaths: -3%
• Hospitalizations: -3%
• ED Visits: -3%Form collaborative partnerships that increasethe adoption of the evidence-based programCoaching Boys into Men (CBIM).
In Cohort 1:
• 1 high school implemented and completedthe program with 100% of the basketballteam.
• 1 male mentor group completed the program,and a second cohort is now underway
Interpersonal Violence Prevention
Change Ideas
PD1.SD1.CI3: Change Social Norms
PD2.SD2.CI4: Guidelines for Assessing Risk
PD3.SD1.CI2: Non-violent skills training
Process Measures
9. % of children and youth
receiving EB SEL, positive youth
development, and non-violence
skills
19
Tennessee
Interpersonal Violence Prevention
Process Measure 9: Percent of children and youth receiving EB SEL, positive youth
development, and non-violence skills
The Tennessee team is working to implement Coaching Boy into Men in a number of schools
and one community-based mentoring program.
20
SUGGESTIONS OR QUESTIONS?
We’re
listening.
21
Poll: Who is going to Safe States?
•Enter their name and state in the poll
•Example: Bekah Thomas, MA
22
Who Working with Law Enforcement through the CS CoIIN?
•Raise your hand
•Quickly describe your work
23
Upcoming Deliverables & Calls
Submit your Driver Diagram
Monthly Reports about June were due on July 11th
Monthly Reports about July are due on August 8th
QI Corner: August 15th, 1-2pm ET
Populations and Settings: August 22nd, 1-2 pm ET
CSN Staff will be in touch soon about technical
assistance for refining your measurement strategy
24
Thank you for participating!
Please complete this brief evaluation:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/WZCQTDL
Questions or Comments? Contact:
617-618-2178
For more information, visit: https://www.childrenssafetynetwork.org/cscoiin