International Migration and Economic Development Robert E.B. Lucas Boston University.

24
International Migration and Economic Development Robert E.B. Lucas Boston University

Transcript of International Migration and Economic Development Robert E.B. Lucas Boston University.

International Migration and Economic Development

Robert E.B. Lucas

Boston University

Adult Migrants In EU-15 By region of origin (2000)

Data Source: OECD Database on Expatriates and Immigrants, 2004

W Europe

E Europe

Former SovietN & C America

S America

S Asia

E Asia

Middle E

N Africa

SS Africa

Given widening income and demographic gaps

migration pressures will continue to grow

Medium Population Growth ProjectionsAnnual Growth 2005-2050: Ages 15-29

<-1%

<0%

<1%

<2%

>2%

Pressures to emigrate often reflect

– failure to create jobs– failure to maintain security

Emigration option is a critical safety valve

Average Unemployment RatesSelect Countries of Origin: 1990-2004 (approx).

RomaniaTurkey

MoroccoAlgeria

TunisiaSuriname

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Refugees Originating Per Thousand Population (2003)

<0.1

<1

<10

>10

Despite growing economic gaps,migration has grown less quickly

than trade and financial flows

1960 1970 1980 1990 20000

1

2

3

4

5

6

7E

xpor

ts (

Trill

ion

US

200

0$)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Mig

rant

s (1

00 M

illio

n)

Global volume of exports

Global stock of migrants

Migration is not a substitute for development

Some risk of long-term

dependence on migration

Migrants are the big winnersDespite commercialization of migration

These gains to migrants

are a form of development

But migration can have important impacts on development at home

Not all impacts are positive

Poverty alleviation greatestfrom low-skill

circular migration

• High levels of remittances reach poor

• Low skill workers at home benefit

Reported Remittances Sent per Migrant (2000)

Source: IMF Balance of Payments Statistics and UN Trends in Migrant Stock

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

US

$

But migration of low skilled workers to OECD

is largely from neighboring countries

Low-Skill Migration Rates to OECD

<1%<2%<3%<5%<10%>10%

Low Education Adult Migrants In EU-15 By region of origin (2000)

W Europe

Americas

E EuropeFormer Soviet

S Asia

E Asia

W Asia

N Africa

SS Africa

Data Source: OECD Database on Expatriates and Immigrants, 2004

South-South Migration Dominates

For Low Skill Workers From Low Income Countries

Most is irregular

Calls for bilateral/regional agreements

High Skill Migration to OECD Growing RapidlyPercent of tertiary educated population abroad in OECD: 2000

<2%<5%<10%<20%>20%

Source: Mapped from Docquier and Marfouk (2005)

Tertiary Educated, Non-OECD Adults In EU-15 By region of origin (2000)

Data Source: OECD Database on Expatriates and Immigrants, 2004

Europe

Former Soviet

C America

S America

S AsiaE Asia

Middle E

N Africa

SS Africa

Low

MiddleHigh

Low MiddleHigh

Europe America0

5

10

15M

illio

ns

Non-OECD

OECD origin

High Skill Migration to N America DominatesExpatriates in OECD Countries: 2000

Distribution of Tertiary Educated Population From E Europe in OECD: 2000

RussiaLatvia

MoldovaUkraine

HungaryPoland

RomaniaBelarusCroatia

Czech RepublicLithuania

AlbaniaSlovenia

EstoniaBosnia and Herzegovi

BulgariaSlovakia

Serbia and MontenegrMacedonia

0 20 40 60 80 100

Percent

Other EuropeEU15 N America

Migration policies of high income countries

• Not part of coherent development strategy

• Competition to attract highly skilled (students)

• Yet protect low skill sectors (agriculture)

Low-Skill Temporary Migration Schemes Present a Dilemma

• Integration and rights of migrants

Family separation & social effects

• Managing returnTransferable pension schemes

Mode 4 and contracting

Cost of re-entry (irregulars)