Institut für Umwelttechnik und Energiewirtschaft · 2010 2011 2012 All together about 40.000 t/a...
Transcript of Institut für Umwelttechnik und Energiewirtschaft · 2010 2011 2012 All together about 40.000 t/a...
Institut für Umwelttechnik und Energiewirtschaft
Institut für Umwelttechnik und Energiewirtschaft, Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg (TUHH)
Eißendorfer Straße 40, D-21073 Hamburg, www.tu-harburg.de/iue
Gasification of urban biomass residues
– Possibilities in Hamburg/Germany–
Hannes Wagner, Andrea Stooß, Stefan Luebben, Martin Kaltschmitt,
Rüdiger Siechau, Jan Grundmann, Stefan Weber
Project Partners
System and Integration Aspects of Biomass-based Gasification, Gothenborg/Sweden, November 19th-20th 2013 2
Outline
Background
Biomass residues for gasification
Gasification tests
Process analysis and results
Summary and outlook
System and Integration Aspects of Biomass-based Gasification, Gothenborg/Sweden, November 19th-20th 2013 3
Background
• Increasing interest in utilisation of biogenic residues for
energy production
• Stadtreinigung Hamburg (SRH) is a municipal solid waste
treatment company, responsible for treatment of major
amounts of biogenic residues and wastes of the city of
Hamburg.
• Biogenic waste from housholds is already very efficiently
treated in a combined fermentation and compost facility
• What to do with lignocellulosic waste streams especially
waste wood, garden residues and leaves?
Feasibility study: Gasification of urban biomass
residues in Hamburg
System and Integration Aspects of Biomass-based Gasification, Gothenborg/Sweden, November 19th-20th 2013 4
Biomass residues for gasification
Waste Wood
(WW)
Garden residues
(GR)
Leaves
(L)
0
500
1 000
1 500
2 000
2 500
3 000
3 500
4 000
Janu
ary
Feb
ruary
Ma
rch
April
Ma
y
June
July
Augu
st
Septe
mb
er
Octo
be
r
No
ve
mbe
r
De
ce
mbe
r
Colle
ction in t
/month
2007 2008 2009
2010 2011 2012
0
200
400
600
800
1 000
1 200
1 400
1 600
1 800
2 000
Janu
ary
Feb
ruary
Ma
rch
April
Ma
y
June
July
Augu
st
Septe
mb
er
Octo
be
r
No
ve
mbe
r
De
ce
mbe
r
Colle
ction in t
/month
2007 2008 2009
2010 2011 2012
0
1 000
2 000
3 000
4 000
5 000
6 000
7 000
8 000
9 000
10 000
Janu
ary
Feb
ruary
Ma
rch
April
Ma
y
June
July
Augu
st
Septe
mb
er
Octo
be
r
No
ve
mbe
r
De
ce
mbe
r
Colle
ction in t
/month
2007 2008 2009
2010 2011 2012
All together about 40.000 t/a of biogenic residues available,
but with very different characteristics in fuel properties and availability
System and Integration Aspects of Biomass-based Gasification, Gothenborg/Sweden, November 19th-20th 2013 5
Biomass residues for gasification
0
1 000
2 000
3 000
4 000
5 000
6 000
7 000
8 000
Ja
nu
ary
Febru
ary
Ma
rch
Apri
l
Ma
y
Ju
ne
Ju
ly
Aug
ust
Sep
tem
be
r
Octo
ber
Novem
be
r
Decem
be
r
Co
lle
cti
on
(2
01
2)
in t
/mo
nth
WW GR L
WW-GR-L WW GR-L
41 €/t 43 €/t 62 €/t
Estimated fuel production costs
Analysis of different options:
WW-GR-L: waste wood, garden
residues and leaves
together
WW: only waste wood
GR-L: only garden residues
and leaves
System and Integration Aspects of Biomass-based Gasification, Gothenborg/Sweden, November 19th-20th 2013 6
Gasification tests
• Fuel samples for gasification tests
• Samples were gasified in a 100 kW steam blown
dual fluidised bed pilot plant at Vienna University
of Technology.
• Gasification behaviour was found to be very
similar to conventional wood pellets
Waste wood Garden residues Leaves
System and Integration Aspects of Biomass-based Gasification, Gothenborg/Sweden, November 19th-20th 2013 7
Gasification tests: Results
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
WW GR L WW GR L WW GR L WW GR L WW GR L
H2 CO CO2 CH4 C2+
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n in
vo
l-%
(d
ry)
Conventional wood chips or pellets
System and Integration Aspects of Biomass-based Gasification, Gothenborg/Sweden, November 19th-20th 2013 8
Gasification tests: Results
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
WW GR L WW GR L WW GR L WW GR L
Tar NH3 H2S HCl
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n in
mg
/Nm
3 (
dry
)
Conventional wood chips or pellets
System and Integration Aspects of Biomass-based Gasification, Gothenborg/Sweden, November 19th-20th 2013 9
Process concepts
WW-GR-L WW GR-L
Description Basic Basic + ORC - -
- Waste wood
- Garden residues
- Leaves
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Pre-treatment Mechanical,
drying
Mechanical Mechanical,
drying
Gasification Allothermal dual fluidised bed gasification,
Classification, recovery of bed material
Gas cleaning Preacoated fabric filter, RME scrubber, Sulfuric acid scrubber
Electricity generation Gas engines Gas engines,
ORC
Gas engines
Fuel input in MW 20,1 12,9 7,1
Main product /
by-product
Electricity,
district heating Electricity
Electricity,
district heating
• Sulfuric acid scrubber for removal of ammonia to reduce NOx Emissions
• Bed material is taken from the combustion chamber and classified to
remove inert material (Sand) from the process
• An organic-rankine-cyce (ORC) is considered to evaluate the possibility
of electricity generation instead of district heating
System and Integration Aspects of Biomass-based Gasification, Gothenborg/Sweden, November 19th-20th 2013 10
Mechanical
pretreatment Drying
Gasification
chamber
Precoated
fabric filter
RME
scrubber
Sulfuric acid
scrubber
Gas engines
Producer gas
cooler
Combustion
chamber
Flue gas
coolerFabric filter
Bed material
classification
Heat integration / Cooling / (ORC)
Biogenic
residues
Inerts
Flue gas
Power
Metalls,
Fines
Ammonium
sulfatePrecoat
material
RME
Sulfuric
acid
Bed
material
Fly ash
District
heating
Flue gas
Pretreatment
Gasification
Heat integration,
Power production
Flue gas
cleaning
Producer gas
cleaning
Process overview
System and Integration Aspects of Biomass-based Gasification, Gothenborg/Sweden, November 19th-20th 2013 11
Possible site in Hamburg
11
Waste
incineration
plant
Biogas plant
Source: google maps
District heating /
electricity grid
Weighing
machine
• Possible site at waste
incineration plant in
Hamburg-Stellingen
• Existing waste treatment
location with related
infrastructure (Biogas plant,
Weighing machine, service
facilities)
• Connection to the district
heating system with high
base load
• Direct connection to the
highway
System and Integration Aspects of Biomass-based Gasification, Gothenborg/Sweden, November 19th-20th 2013 12
Results: Energy flow diagramm
System and Integration Aspects of Biomass-based Gasification, Gothenborg/Sweden, November 19th-20th 2013 13
Results: Heat integration
Without ORC With ORC
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Tem
pera
ture
in
°C
Heat in MW
Hot composite curve
Cold composite curve
District heating
Cooling
• Better utilisation of the high temperture with ORC but significantly higher
cooling demand and increased process complexity
• ORC may be operated in backpressure mode for CHP
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Tem
pera
ture
in
°C
Heat in MW
Hot composite curve
Cold composite curve
ORC
Cooling
System and Integration Aspects of Biomass-based Gasification, Gothenborg/Sweden, November 19th-20th 2013 14
Results: Efficiency
27,0
35,7
28,5
21,0
36,9
0,0
33,9
38,7
63,0
34,2
61,8
58,1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Basic Basic+ORC - -
WW-GR-L WW GR-L
Effic
ien
cy in
%
Electric power
District heating
Total net efficiency
System and Integration Aspects of Biomass-based Gasification, Gothenborg/Sweden, November 19th-20th 2013 16
Results: Investment costs
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Basic Basic+ORC - -
WW-GR-L WW GR-L
Investm
ent in
mio
. €
Contingency
Engineering
Buildings / Yardimprovements
Electronics
Piping
Instruments
Heat exchanger
Auxiliaryequipment
Power generation
Gas cleaning
Gasification
Storage / Feeding
6085 €/kWel
5655 €/kWel
5660 €/kWel
10695 €/kWel
System and Integration Aspects of Biomass-based Gasification, Gothenborg/Sweden, November 19th-20th 2013 17
Results: Production costs
17,3
17,9 14,0
43,1
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Basic Basic+ORC - -
WW-GR-L WW GR-L
Pro
duction c
osts
in c
t/kW
h
Revenues for by-products
Other costs
Operating costs
Otherconsumptioncosts
Fuel costs
Capital costs
Production costs
System and Integration Aspects of Biomass-based Gasification, Gothenborg/Sweden, November 19th-20th 2013 19
Results: Sensitivity analysis for WW-GR-L
14
16
18
20
22
-60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Pro
du
ctio
n c
osts
in c
t/kW
h
Parameter variation
Fuel price: 41 €/t
RME price: 0,87 €/kg
Bed material: 0,20 €/kg
Heat revenues: 3, ct/kWh
System and Integration Aspects of Biomass-based Gasification, Gothenborg/Sweden, November 19th-20th 2013 20
Summary and outlook
• Up to 40 000 t/a of biogenic residues equal to approx. 20 MW fuel
input are available for gasification in Hamburg
• Gasification tests indicate similar characteristics to wood chips or
pellets, however fuel properties are still challenging, especially:
– Large fractions of inert material have to be removed from the gasification
process, recovery of bed material is necessary
– Higher fractions of contaminants (NH3, H2S, HCl) have to be treated,
sulfuric acid scrubber for ammonia removal to reduce NOx emissions
• Gasification of leaves and garden residues seems to be unfavourable
form an economic point of view mainly caused by high pretreatment
and operation costs as well as lower process efficiency
• The management of inert material (sand) has to be investigated further
to get first hand data about the behaviour and fate of these materials in
the process
• Evaluation of further options for example sand as bed material to
reduce costs
System and Integration Aspects of Biomass-based Gasification, Gothenborg/Sweden, November 19th-20th 2013 21
Gasification of urban biomass residues
– Possibilities in Hamburg/Germany–
Contact: Dipl.-Ing. Hannes Wagner
Institute of Environmental Technology and Energy Economics
Hamburg University of Technology
Eißendorferstraße 40
D-21073 Hamburg
www.tuhh.de/iue
Tel.: +49(0)40 42878-4549
E-Mail: [email protected]