Huck Finn Book Trial

download Huck Finn Book Trial

of 4

Transcript of Huck Finn Book Trial

  • 7/31/2019 Huck Finn Book Trial

    1/4

    Huck Finn Book Trial

    Opponents of the book are correct to say that, the word nigger is used 219 times in thebook. However, how do the opponents reconcile this? In The case of MONTEIRO v. THE

    TEMPE UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT (1998)- Words can hurt, particularly racist

    epithets, Stephen Reinhardt wrote, but a necessary component of any education islearning to think critically about offensive ideas. Without this ability, one can do little to

    respond to them. Part of learning to think critically about offensive speech is to

    understand the context in which it is used. In a 3-0 ruling, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court ofAppeals refused to reinstate a black womans lawsuit seeking to remove the Mark Twain

    classic and a William Faulkner story from the required-reading list at her daughters

    Arizona high school. The court acknowledged that words can wound, but said a book

    approved by school officials for its educational value does not violate federal civil rightslaws.

    The grammar sucks. How do you reconcile this?

    It gives us a great insight into the vernacular of the American south at the time. Itssomething you cant read about in a textbook. Frederick Douglas never wrote in the

    vernacular.

    Banning books sucks.

    Banning books in general is bad enough! Where they burn books, they will also

    burn people.- Heinrich Heine (German romantic poet)

    The Nazis burned books, then they burned people.

    According to the Werther EffectHow do you reconcile this?

    Lets pretend we actually believe in the Werther Effect. Wouldnt we want our kidsto act like righteous Huck?? Isnt this like the righteous gentiles during theholocaust?

    The friendship that forms between Jim and Huck you cant just find in a textbook

    It was a close place. I took . . . up [the letter I'd written to Miss Watson], and held

    it in my hand. I was a-trembling, because I'd got to decide, forever, betwixt two

    things, and I knowed it. I studied a minute, sort of holding my breath, and then saysto myself: All right then, I'll go to helland tore it up. It was awful thoughts and

    awful words, but they was said. And I let them stay said; and never thought no

    more about reforming. True friendship is shown here, a complete rarity for those

    times.

    The books use of satire of various revered institutions is also uncommon for its time and

    should be looked on as a positive aspect that you cannot gain from simply reading atextbook. Sherburn says to the mob:

    The pitifulest thing out is a mob; that's what an army is--a mob; they don't fight with

    courage that's born in them, but with courage that's borrowed from their mass, and from

  • 7/31/2019 Huck Finn Book Trial

    2/4

    their officers. But a mob without any Man at the head of it is Beneath pitifulness. It is

    obvious that he is satirizing the Klu Klux Klan here.

    Love and Death in the American Novel (1960)- Leslie Fielder

    His 1948 essay, Come Back to the Raft Agin, Huck Honey! argued that a

    recurrent theme in American literature was an unspoken or implied homoeroticrelationship between men, and famously used Mark Twain's iconic fictional

    creations, Huckleberry Finn and his African American companion Jim, as

    examples.

    His book emphasized that males paired in these wilderness adventures tend to be of

    different races, and that their relationships include issues of masculinity and touch

    on intimacy, sensuality, and suppressed sexuality between men.

    In the case of Board of Education v. Pico (1982) the United States Supreme Court held that

    the First Amendment limits the power of local school boards to remove library books from

    junior high schools and high schools. Justice Blackmun, concurring, concluded that aproper balance between the limited constitutional restriction imposed on school officials by

    the First Amendment and the broad state authority to regulate education, would be struckby holding that school officials may not remove books from school libraries for the purpose

    of restricting access to the political ideas or social perspectives discussed in the books,

    when that action is motivated simply by the officials disapproval of the ideas involved.

    I. Freedom of Speech, Press, Religion, and Petition

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting

    the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the

    right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for aredress of grievances.

    Schenck v. United States (1919)- Clear and present danger: doctrine adopted by

    the Supreme Court of the United States to determine under what circumstances

    limits can be placed on First Amendment freedoms of speech, press or assembly.What clear and present danger is presented in people reading this book

    Whitney v. California (1927)- Held that speech that merely advocated violence

    could be made illegal.

  • 7/31/2019 Huck Finn Book Trial

    3/4

    Twain's satirical observations concerning human folly and social injustice, during hislifetime, led to widespread criticism of his works as vulgar and improper. Throughout the

    book Huck participates in helping in conning people out of their money, lying to just about

    everybody he comes in contact with, and other activities which appear to be okay

    according to Twain. It seems that Mark Twain made everything that was bad seem ok andeverything that promoted good was bad or just showed people's ignorance. Miss Watson

    tells Huck that if he doesn't change his ways then he won't go to heaven. Huck has come to

    believe that Miss Watson will be in heaven so he decides that he "couldn't see no advantage

    in going where she was going, so I made up my mind I wouldn't try for it." Other times inthe novel when people are at religious gatherings they all give money to people who get up

    and tell about their experiences. The people aren't smart enough to realize they are beingconned out of their money so Twain puts the blame on religious belief rather than the

    ignorance of the individual. Furthermore, there is a feud between the Grangerford and the

    Shepherdson familys; they decide that they will not kill each other on Sunday because thatis the holy day and because they are all loving brothers. However, Twain deliberately lets

    them fight to the death and murder each other in cold blood. Is this what teachers should

    provide students to educate them in the correct manner?

    They will offer a series of bogus arguments that we will easily refute. We stand before u as

    the defenders of the cornerstone of democracy namely the 1st amendment and our

    commitment to the free exchange of ideas. Although this is a private school, there are 2

    flags outside our school. Our Mission statement embraces the spirit of a publics school

    commitment to diversity, equality, acceptance and a broad education. And lastly and most

    imptly as jews we know how dangerous cencership is. What was the 1st thing Hitler did?

    He burned books. Do we really want to embrace that kind of cencership.

  • 7/31/2019 Huck Finn Book Trial

    4/4

    If W.E.B. Du Bois were right that the problem of the twentieth century is racism, one

    would never know it from the average secondary-school syllabus, which often avoids

    issues of race almost completely. However,Huck Finn can slip into the American literature

    classroom as a "classic," only to engulf students in heated debates about prejudice and

    racism, conformity, autonomy, authority, slavery and freedom. It is a book that puts on the

    table the very questions the culture so often tries to bury, a book that opens out into the

    complex history that shaped it; the history of the ante-bellum era in which the story is set,

    and the history of the post-war period in which the book was written. It also requires us to

    address that history. Much of that history is painful. Indeed, it is to avoid confronting the

    pain of that history that black parents sometimes mobilize to ban the novel. Pushing history

    aside, however, is no solution to the larger challenge of dealing with its legacy. Neither is

    placing the task of dealing with it on one book. Therefore, to say ignorance is bliss

    would be a seditious act against the educational system in America.