GROWTH AND INNOVATION IN OCEAN ECONOMY GAPS AND …€¦ · 18/07/2016 S.Simoncelli First draft...

GrowthandinnovationinoceaneconomyGapsandprioritiesinseabasinobservationanddata

D12.2.5Version:V2Date:18Jul2016

1

GROWTHANDINNOVATIONINOCEANECONOMYGAPSANDPRIORITIESINSEABASIN

OBSERVATIONANDDATA

THEMEDITERRANEANSEA

D12.2.4Six-monthlyProgressReport(04/12/2015–03/06/2016)

Totalnumberofpages:43Workpackage 12 ProjectManagementAuthor(s): S.Simoncelli INGV

Aprojectfundedby:EUROPEANCOMMISSION,DIRECTORATE-GENERALFORMARITIMEAFFAIRSANDFISHERIES,

MARITIMEPOLICYATLANTIC,OUTERMOSTREGIONSANDARCTIC



2

DocumentLogDate Author Changes Version Status18/07/2016 S.Simoncelli Firstdraftpreparation V1 Draft19/07/2016 N.Pinardi,G.Manzella Review V2 Completed



3

Table of Contents

ExecutiveSummary..................................................................................................................................4

1.WP1:LiteratureReview(IFREMER)...............................................................................................52.WP2–WP8..............................................................................................................................................6

9.WP9:Websitedevelopment(CLS)..................................................................................................9

10.WP10:OrganizationofPanels(INGV)......................................................................................1111.WP11:DataAdequacyReports(INGV).....................................................................................12

12.WP12:Projectmanagement(INGV)..........................................................................................15



4

ExecutiveSummary DuringthefifthsixmonthsoftheProjectthemaineffortswerededicatedto:

1) TheproductionandreleaseoftheTargetedProductsbythesevenchallenges;2) The finalization of the methodology for the collection of harmonized information on

upstreamdataandTargetedProductsenablingthebuildingofadequacyindicators;3) Thedefinitionofappropriatenessqualitymeasuresandqualityerrors;4) Updateofthechallengeswebpages;5) TargetedProductsvisualization;6) Therevisionoftheinputmetadatabase.

ThemethodologyforthefitnessforuseevaluationadvancedinparalleltotheproductionoftheTargetedProducts.ItisbaseduponthedefinitionoftheexpectedDataProductSpecification(DPS)and theactualTargetedProductDescription (TPD).Bycomparing theexpectedand the realizedproductsspecificationsitwillbepossibletoextractthenextDARfitnessforuseindicators.All the Challenges contributed very actively to the production and release of the TargetedProducts, the annexed documentation describing the methodology applied and an expertevaluationontheirappropriateness.Inconclusion,theprojecthasshowntobecapabletofollowthemajormilestonesanddeliverablesasexpectedfromthetenderandnomajorchangesareforeseenforthenextsixmonthsontheworkplanschedule.



5

1.WP1:LiteratureReview(IFREMER)ThisWorkpackagewascompletedatmonth10(September23,2014)ofthefirstyearandthepastreportshavedocumentedthedevelopment.

++


D12.2.4Version:V4Date:11Jan2016

6

2.WP2–WP8Duringthereportingperiodallthe7Challengeshavebeenworkingonthefollowingactivities:

• Reporting on the methodology and finalization of the Targeted Products (internaldeliverablesD*.3.4andtheirupdateD*.3.5);

• ReleaseoftheTargetedProductsintheprojectrepository;• Webpages updatewith a synthesis of objectives,methodology, data sources and list of

TargetedProducts;• Targeted Products visualization in the GIS portal in collaboration with WP9, under the

coordinationofWP12;• Revisionoftheinputmetadatabase;• OrganizationandpresentationattheEGU2016SplinterMeeting.

In December 2016 the coordinator distributed a template for D*.3.4 reports containing thefollowingoutline:

1. GeneralscopeoftheTargetedProducts2. TargetedProductscatalogue3. DescriptionofCharacteristicsandDatasourcesusedbyTargetedproducts4. DescriptionofmethodologytoproducetheTargetedProducts5. ExpertevaluationofTargetedProductquality6. Expertevaluationofgaps

AllchallengesprovidedthereportsandtheirupdatedversionD*.3.5inJune2016.Thereportsarenow under internal revision before their submission (planned for October 2016) to the expertpanelforanexternalreview.TheTPshavebeenreleasedontheprojectrepositoryinordertostarttheimplementationoftheGISvisualization.Mostoftheproductsarenowvisiblefromthewebportal,fromthechallengeswebpages,thathavebeenallupdatedtoinclude:objective,methodology,datasourcesandtheTP list.Figures2.1,2.2,2.3,2.4arescreenshotofchallengeswebpagesshowingthe listsofTPSandtheirlinkstotheGISvisualizationforCH1,CH2,CH4andCH6.CH3 TPs are available as pdf files and are downloadable as well from the web pagehttp://www.emodnet-mediterranean.eu/portfolio/oil-platforms-leak/.CH5TPshavebeenreleasedintheprojectrepository,MEDSEA_CH5_Product_4-5and8havebeenvisualized but they are not accessible yet due to some needed adjustment. ProductsMEDSEA_CH5_Product_6and7needtobeimplementedintheGISportal.CH7 TPs have been released in the project repository but their visualization needs additionaleffortsinordertobeabletodisplayriveroutflowtimeseriesofthevariousparametersclickingattherivermouths.

++



7

Fig.2.1ScreenshotfromChallenge1webpagewiththelistoftheTargetedProductsandthelinkstotheGISvisualization.http://www.emodnet-mediterranean.eu/portfolio/windfarm-siting/

Fig.2.2ScreenshotfromChallenge2webpagewiththelistoftheTargetedProductsandthelinkstotheGISvisualization.http://www.emodnet-mediterranean.eu/portfolio/marine-protected-areas/

++



8

Fig.2.3ScreenshotfromChallenge4webpagewiththelistoftheTargetedProductsandthelinkstotheGISvisualization.http://www.emodnet-mediterranean.eu/portfolio/climate-coastal-protection/

Fig.2.4ScreenshotfromChallenge6webpagewiththelistoftheTargetedProductsandthelinkstotheGISvisualization.http://www.emodnet-mediterranean.eu/portfolio/marine-environment/

TheTPs,theirmethodology,GISvisualizationandthemetadatabaseoftheupstreamdatasetsusedareunderrevision,toassureasuccessfulresultoftheassessmentmethodology.

++



9

9.WP9:Websitedevelopment(CLS)Theactivityduringthelastsixmonthscoveredmanyactivities:

• TargetedProductsvisualization;• Challenges web pages update including schematic of the methodology and the list of

TargetedProductsandthelinktotheGISvisualization;• Maintenanceofsuiteoftools.

AdetaileddescriptionoftheWebPortalisincludedintheD12.4deliverable.The appropriateness quality elements for Data Product Specification (DPS), Targeted ProductDescription(TPD)andUpstreamData(UD)weredefined inordertoproduceQualityErrors.Theprinciples adopted are guided by ISO 19131 standard for Data Product Specification (DPS). Ametadata template has been produced and tested for Challenge 3 case to design the Sextantmetadatabasedevelopments,toplantheimplementationphaseandtheactionsneededfromthechallengeleaderstopopulatethemetadatabase.Inparallel, thedesignof the automatized visual outputof theoverallmonitoring assessment isproceeding. Theprocessforoperationswithrolesandexpectationshasbeenconsolidated(cf.Figure9.2).Therole1isattheeditorlevel,therole2isareferentbychallengeforworkflowanimationandfirstlevel of administration, the role 3 is under Literature Survey and Data Adequacy reportsresponsibilitytoconsolidatetheinformationregisteredandsueforcross-thematicevaluation.

Figure9.2CheckpointOperations

++



10

Themonitoring ofMedSeaweb portal visitors for the period 1 January 2016 – 15 July 2016 issummarizedinFig.9.3.2641usersvisitedthewebportalfromdifferentcountries.Thedurationofeachsectionsuggeststhattheusersgodeepinthewebportal.

Figure9.3Monitoringofthewebsitevisitorsresults(Jan-Jul2016).

++



11

10.WP10:OrganizationofPanels(INGV)Thee-newslettern.4(D10.2.4)isinpreparation.Maintopicsofthenewissueare:

• TargetedProductsdefinitionandgeneration;• DPS(DataProductSpecification)andTPD(TargetedProductDescription);• Websiteandserviceupgrade.

NoneactivitywasdedicatedtothenextPanelMeetingorganization,whichwillbeoneofthemainactivitiesinupcomingfifthperiod

++



12

11.WP11:DataAdequacyReports(INGV) During the reportingperiod theWP11wasdedicated to the refinementof themethodology forthe collection of harmonized information onUpstream Data (UD) and Targeted Products (TP)enablingthebuildingoffitnessforuseindicatorsandreport.InordertoevaluatetheadequacyoftheinputdatasetsusedtobuildtheTargetedProductsweneedthreesteps(seeFigure11.1):

I. to define the Data Product Specification (DPS) and its relationship to input data sets(referenceorexpectedsetofspecifications);

II. to define the Targeted Product Description (TPD) and the specific UD used (realizedspecification)

III. bycomparingtheexpectedandtherealizedspecificationsitwillbepossibletoextractthenextDARfitnessforuseindicators.

Figure11.1TheinformationcontentofthecompleteCheckpointMetadatabaseandtheprocesses.

Table11.1 summarizes theadoptedproductcomponent ISOqualityelements forDPS,TPDandUD, their definitions. It includes nine ranks plus an expert evaluation on the usability of theproduct. TheseQE corresponds to nineQualityMeasures (QM) for appropriateness specificallydefined within the MedSea Checkpoint. The identification of the appropriateness QMs iscomposed by characters (XXX) indicating theDPS (Data Product Specification) or TPD (targetedProductDescription)orUD (UpstreamData - the Inputdata set), thenbyAP (appropriateness),followedbyafirstnumberindicatingthequalityelementandbyasecondnumberindicatingthesub-element.

++



13

Table 11.1 ISO Quality elements for DPS, TPD and UD, their definitions and the MedSeaCheckpointQualityMeasures(QM)forappropriateness. Table 11.2 shows the MedSea CheckpointQuality Errors (QE) definitions and the formulas tocomputethemstartingfromDPSandTPDQM.QEwillbecomputedforeachcomponent(Cn)oftheTP. IfweconsidertheOPLBulletin,Challenge3TP,thismeansthatQEwillbeevaluatedfortwocomponents:I. Thelikelyoilspilltrajectory,10daysforecastofoiltransportandtransformationwithin24

hoursfromtheinitialrequest;II. Theassessmentofpotentialimpactonthecoastalsocio-economicactivities.

Table11.2MedSeaCheckpointQualityErrors(QE)definitionsforeachcomponentoftheTPD

++



14

Table11.3displaystheUDQEdefinitions.EachTPcomponent(Cn)willbeassociatedtotheUDusedandforeachinputdatasetsUDappropriatenessQMandDPSQMenterintheQEformula.

Table11.3MedSeaCheckpointQualityErrors(QE)definitionsforeachUDrelatedtoaspecificTPD. Othercollateralactivitieswerededicatedto:

• the review of the 7 challenges Targeted Products (described in D*.3.4 and their updateD*3.5)incollaborationwiththeWP2-WP8;

• thevisualizationofthe7challengesTargetedProductsincollaborationwithWP9andtheWP2-WP8;

• thereview/validationoftheinputmetadatabaseincollaborationwiththeWP2-WP8;Duringthe2ndAnnualMeetingwedecidedtoorganizeasplintermeetingatthenextEGUgeneralassembly 2016 (17-22 April) to promote the MedSea Checkpoint service and to submit aquestionnairesurveyontheuserneedsandtocollecttheresults.Themeetingwassuccessful,20potentialusersattendedthemeeting,plustheMedSeaCheckpointteam.TheresultsofthesurveywereanalysedinaninternalD11.3“Reportonquestionnairesurveyonuserneeds”.Duetothe

++



15

12.WP12:Projectmanagement(INGV) MeetingsProjectmanagementcontinueduninterruptedlyduringthefifthsixmonthsoftheproject.SeveralWebexMeetingswereheldhavingastopicsofthediscussion:

1) Thedefinitionoftheassessmentmethodologyforappropriatenessterritory;2) ThedefinitionofDataProductSpecification(DPS)andTargetedProductDescription(TPD)qualityelementstocomputefitnessforuseandfitnessforpurposeindicators;3) ThedefinitionofDPSandTPDtemplatesandtheframework(Sextant)inordertoretrieveallneededinformationfromthepartners;4) Developmentoftheindicators;5) The implementationof thedevelopedprocedureas aMedSeaCheckpoint servicewithinthewebportal.

ItfollowsthelistofWebexMeeting:• Feb15,2016;• Feb22,2016;• Feb29,2016;• Mar21,2016;• Mar24,2016;• Apr1,2016;• Apr6,2016;• Apr15,2016

AMeeting inBolognaon9-10March,2016wasorganizedwiththesametopicofdiscussion,N.Pinardi,G.Manzella,S.SimoncelliandE.Mussatparticipatedtothediscussions.Giuseppe Manzella participated to the 5th EMODNET Steering Committee from 14:00 onWednesday9Decemberuntil17:30onThursday10December2015inBrussels.The scientific coordinatorNadia Pinardi participated to the 6th EMODnet Steering CommitteeMeetingfrom8:3021Juneuntil15:30on22June2016inBrussels.EGUSplinterMeetingINGV organized at the EGU 2016 Conference a splinter meeting dedicated to the MedSeaCheckPoint:

EMODnetMediterraneanSeaCheckpointSplinterMeetingEGUGeneralAssembly2016

April20th,201612:15-13:15

http://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2016/session/22331Agenda

http://www.emodnet-mediterranean.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Medsea_Splinter_Meeting_Draft_Agenda_V1.pdf

++



16

Organizers:S.Simoncelli,G.Manzella,N.Pinardi(INGV,IT)

ScientificSteeringCommittee:[email protected]

SimonaSimoncellisimona.simoncelli@[email protected]

[email protected]@[email protected]

Theobjectiveswere:• to raise awareness on the concept of EMODnet Regional Checkpoints, i.e. activities

connectedtomarinemonitoringsystemassessmentbaseduponBluGrowthapplications;• to receive feedback from a large research community pool on the partial results of the

CheckpointDedicatedWebexMeetingswiththescientificsteeringcommittee:

• 31March2016;• Apr8,2016;• Apr15,2016.

AftertheMeetingweaskedtoparticipatetoanonlinesurveyandtheanalysisofusersfeedbackwassummarizedinareport.Fortheeventwecreatedtheonlinesurveyandamailinglistofusers.Participation to theEGU2016SplinterMeeting:Pinardi/Simoncelli/Manzella from INGVand thechallengeleaders.Conferences

1. S. Simoncelli, N. Pinardi, G. Manzella, E. Clementi, A. Guarnieri. The EMODNetMediterranean Checkpoint: Status of Development. Rome 8-9 March, 2016 INGVConvegnodiStrutturaAmbiente.

2. Eric Moussat, Nadia Pinardi, Giuseppe Manzella, Frederique Blanc and the MedseaTeam. EMODnet MedSea Checkpoint for sustainable Blue Growth. Vienna 20 April,2016.EGU2016

3. S. Simoncelli, N. Pinardi, G. Manzella, E. Moussat, F. Blanc. The EMODnet MedSeaCheckPoint.8thInternationalWorkshoponModelingtheOcean(IWMO),BOLOGNA.7-10June2016https://eventi.unibo.it/iwmo2016

GROWTH AND INNOVATION IN OCEAN ECONOMY GAPS AND …€¦ · 18/07/2016 S.Simoncelli First draft...

Documents

Transcript of GROWTH AND INNOVATION IN OCEAN ECONOMY GAPS AND …€¦ · 18/07/2016 S.Simoncelli First draft...