Goals, Values and Performance
-
Upload
robert-page -
Category
Documents
-
view
34 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Goals, Values and Performance
Goals, Values and PerformanceGoals, Values and Performance
• Strategy as a quest for value
• What is profit?
• The shareholder value approach
• The shareholder value and strategy formulation
• Mission and values
OUTLINE
Strategy as a Quest for ProfitStrategy as a Quest for Profit
• The stakeholder approach : The firm is a coalition of interest groups—it seeks to balance their different objectives.
• The shareholder approach : The firm exists to maximize the wealth of its owners.
• Why is profit maximization a reasonable goal?
(1) Boards of directors legally obliged to pursue shareholder interests.
(2) To replace assets, firm must earn return on capital > cost of capital (difficult when competition intense).
(3) To avoid acquisition, firm must achieve stock-market value > break-up value.
What is Profit?What is Profit?
• Profit maximization an ambiguous goal– Total profit vs. Rate of profit– Over what time period?
• Accounting profit versus Economic profit
• Economic Value Added (EVA) as a measure of economic profit:— Post-tax operating profit less cost of capital
• From profit maximization to value maximization —Net present value of firm = Discounted future profits
over the life of the firm
Net Inc. ROS ROE EVA Market Return to Value Added Shareholders
($m) (%) (%) ($m) ($m) (%)General Motors 2,956 1.8 19.7 -5,525 -17,943 21.4General Electric 6,573 9.4 22.2 4,370 285,320 45.3Exxon 6,370 6.3 14.6 -2,262 114,774 22.4 Philip Morris 5,450 10.3 39.0 5,180 98,657 64.8IBM 6,328 7.7 32.6 2,541 -5,878 77.5Coca-Cola 3,533 18.8 42.0 2,194 157,356 1.3Wal-Mart 4,430 3.2 21.0 1,159 159,444 107.7 Procter & Gamble 3,780 10.2 12.2 61,661 102,379 15.9 Microsoft4,490 31.0 27.0 3,776 328,257 37.5Hewlett-Packard 2,945 6.3 17.4 -593 45,464 10.7
How U.S. Companies Perform Under Different Profitability Measures, 1998
How U.S. Companies Perform Under Different Profitability Measures, 1998
Value MaximizationValue Maximization
Maximizing the value of the firm:
Max. net present value of free cash flows :
max. V =
(1 + re)t
Ct
Where:
V market value of the firm.
Ct free cash flow in time t
re+d weighted average cost of capital
t
Applying Shareholder Value Maximization to Strategy Choice
Applying Shareholder Value Maximization to Strategy Choice
• Identify strategy alternatives
• Estimate cash flows associated with cash strategy
• Estimate cost of capital for each strategy
• Select the strategy which generates the highest NPV
Valuing Companies and Business UnitsValuing Companies and Business Units
If net case flow growing at constant rate (g)
V = C1
( r - g )
With varying cash flows which can be forecasted
for 4 years:
V = C0 + C1 + C2 + C3 + VH
(1 + r ) (1 + r )2 (1 + r )3 (1 + r )3
where: VH is the horizon value of the firm after 4 years
Problems of DCF Approaches to Strategy Approach
Problems of DCF Approaches to Strategy Approach
• Net Present Value of the Firm depends on option values as well as discounted cash flow expectations
• Estimating cash flows beyond 2-3 year horizon ishazardous---especially in dynamic markets
HENCE: Some simple guidelines for maximizing the value of the firm—
• On existing assets-- maximize after-tax rate of return
• On new investment-- seek after-tax rate of return > cost of capital
OPTIONVALUE
Financial options Real options
Stock price
Exercise price
Uncertainty
Time to expiry
Dividends
Risk-freeInterest rate
Risk-freeinterest rate
Value lost over duration of option
Duration of option
Uncertainty
Investment cost
Present value of returns to theinvestment
=
=
=
=
=
=
The greater the NPV, thehigher the option value
The higher the cost, the lower the option value
Higher volatilityincreases option values
Time = opportunity tolearn about outcomes
Loss of cash flow to fully-committed competitors
lowers option value
Higher interest rate increases option valueby increasing value of deferring investment
Comments
The six levers of financial and real optionsThe six levers of financial and real options
ROCE
Return onSales
Sales/CapitalEmployed
COGS/Sales
Depreciation/Sales
SGA expense/Sales
Fixed Asset TurnoverSales/PPE
Inventory TurnoverSales/Inventories
Creditor TurnoverSales/Acct
Turnover of other items of working
capital
Disaggregating Return on Capital EmployedDisaggregating Return on Capital Employed
Shareholdervalue
creation
Shareholdervalue
creation ROCEROCE
Economic Profit
Economic Profit
MarginMargin
CapitalTurnover
CapitalTurnover
Sales Targets
Sales Targets
cogs/sales
cogs/sales
DevelopmentCost/Sales
DevelopmentCost/Sales
InventoryTurnover
InventoryTurnover
CapacityUtilization
CapacityUtilization
CashTurnover
CashTurnover
Order SizeCustomer MixSales/Account
Customer ChurnRate
Deficit Rates
Cost per DeliveryMaintenance cost
New productdevelopment time
Indirect/DirectLabor
Customer Complaints
Downtime
Accounts PayableTime
Accounts Receivable Time
CEO Corporate/Divisional Functional Departments & Teams
Linking Value Drivers to Performance TargetsLinking Value Drivers to Performance Targets
FINANCIAL
F1 Return on Capital EmployedF2 Cash FlowF3 ProfitabilityF4 Lowest CostF5 Profitable GrowthF6 Manage risk
F1 Return on Capital EmployedF2 Cash FlowF3 ProfitabilityF4 Lowest CostF5 Profitable GrowthF6 Manage risk
Strategic Objectives
Financially
Strong* ROCE* Cash Flow* Net Margin* Full cost per gallon delivered to customer * Volume growth rate Vs. industry* Risk index
* ROCE* Cash Flow* Net Margin* Full cost per gallon delivered to customer * Volume growth rate Vs. industry* Risk index
Strategic Measures
C OU MS ET R-
C1 Continually delight the targeted consumer
C2 Improve dealer/distributor profitability
C1 Continually delight the targeted consumer
C2 Improve dealer/distributor profitability
* Share of segment in key markets* Mystery shopper rating
* Dealer/distributor margin on gasoline* Dealer/distributor survey
* Share of segment in key markets* Mystery shopper rating
* Dealer/distributor margin on gasoline* Dealer/distributor survey
Delight the Consumer
Win-Win Relationship
I1 Marketing 1. Innovative products and services 2. Dealer/distributor quality
I2 Manufacturing 1. Lower manufacturing costs 2. Improve hardware and performance
I3 Supply, Trading, Logistics 1. Reducing delivered cost 2. Trading organization 3. Inventory management
I4 Improve health, safety, and environmental performance I5 Quality
I1 Marketing 1. Innovative products and services 2. Dealer/distributor quality
I2 Manufacturing 1. Lower manufacturing costs 2. Improve hardware and performance
I3 Supply, Trading, Logistics 1. Reducing delivered cost 2. Trading organization 3. Inventory management
I4 Improve health, safety, and environmental performance I5 Quality
INTERNAL
* Non-gasoline revenue and margin per square foot* Dealer/distributor acceptance rate of new programs* Dealer/distributor quality ratings
* ROCE on refinery* Total expenses (per gallon) Vs. competition* Profitability index* Yield index
Delivered cost per gallon .Vs. competitors* Trading margin* Inventory level compared to plan & to output rate
* Number of incidents* Days away from work
* Quality index
* Non-gasoline revenue and margin per square foot* Dealer/distributor acceptance rate of new programs* Dealer/distributor quality ratings
* ROCE on refinery* Total expenses (per gallon) Vs. competition* Profitability index* Yield index
Delivered cost per gallon .Vs. competitors* Trading margin* Inventory level compared to plan & to output rate
* Number of incidents* Days away from work
* Quality index
L E & A GR RN O I WN TG H
L1 Organization Involvement
L2 Core competencies and skills
L3 Access to strategic information
L1 Organization Involvement
L2 Core competencies and skills
L3 Access to strategic information
* Employee survey
* Strategic competing (?) availability
* Strategic information availability
* Employee survey
* Strategic competing (?) availability
* Strategic information availability
Safe and Reliable
Competitive Supplier
Good Neighbor
On SpecOn time
Motivated and
Prepared
Balanced Scorecard for Mobil N. American Marketing & RefiningBalanced Scorecard for Mobil N. American Marketing & Refining
Shareholder ValueMeasures:• Market value of the firm•Market value added (MVA)•Return to shareholders
Intrinsic ValueMeasures:• Discounted cash flows•Real option values
Financial IndicatorsMeasures:• Return on Capital • Growth (of revenues & operating profits•Economic profit (EVA)
Value DriversSources:• Market share• Scale economies• Innovation• Brands
A Comprehensive Value Metrics FrameworkA Comprehensive Value Metrics Framework
The Paradox of ValueThe Paradox of Value
The companies that are most successful in creatinglong term shareholder value are typically those that:
a) Have a mission—They give precedence to goals other than profitability and shareholder return;
a) Have strong, consistent, ethical values.
Examples: a) “Visionary” companies studied by Collins & Porras,
e.g. Merck, Wal-Mart, Procter & Gamble, Disney, HP
b) Boeing — Boeing’s focus pre-1996: “to build great planes” with weak financial controls
— post-1996 focus: creating shareholder value — after 2000, rapid decline in Boeing profitability
Values and MissionValues and Mission
The role of (ethical) values :• Place constraints on the means by which the firm
will pursue shareholder value max.• Increase the effectiveness with which the firm builds
competitive advantage though reinforcing strategic intent and building internal consensus and commitment.
The role of mission:• Foundation for strategy Statement of what the
firm seeks to achieve and what it intends to become.