Global EMC Labs EMC / EMI Test Report - Home - Sangoma · PDF file ·...

REGISTRATION #6844A-1

Testing Laboratory

Certificate # 2555.01

R-2621

C-2864

REG#612361

of 63 Report issued:

6/7/2010

GEMC File #: GEMC-CEFCC-19672R1

© Global EMC Inc. This test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of Global EMC Inc.

This report is based on GEMC report template „CISPR22_24_EMC-EMI_Rev4”

Global EMC Labs

EMC / EMI Test Report

As per

CISPR 22:2006/EN55022:2006 (Class B)

& CISPR 24:1997/EN55024:1998 (+A1 +A2)

Emissions & Immunity for

Information Technology Equipment

on the

B601DE and B601E

Testing produced for

Sangoma Technologies

See appendix A for full customer & EUT details.

Min Xie Project Engineer

Global EMC Inc.

180 Brodie Dr, Unit 2 Richmond Hill, ON L4B 3K8 CANADA

Ph: (905) 883-8189

Client Sangoma Technologies

Product B601DE and B601E

Standard(s) FCC 15 Subpart B, ICES 003, CISPR 22/EN55022

& CISPR 24/EN55024

of 63 Report issued: 6/7/2010 GEMC File #: GEMC-CEFCC-19672R1

© Global EMC Inc. This test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of Global EMC Inc

Table of Contents

Table of Contents ................................................................................................................... 2

Report Scope .......................................................................................................................... 3

Summary ................................................................................................................................ 4

Test Results Summary ....................................................................................................... 5 Justifications or Deviations ................................................................................................ 6

Applicable Standards, Specifications and Methods ............................................................... 7

Document Revision Status ................................................................................................. 8

Definitions and Acronyms ..................................................................................................... 9

Testing Facility .................................................................................................................... 10

Calibrations and Accreditations ....................................................................................... 10 Testing Environmental Conditions and Dates ................................................................. 11

Detailed Test Result Section ................................................................................................ 12

Power Line Conducted Emissions ................................................................................... 13 Telecom Line Conducted Emissions ............................................................................... 22

Radiated Emissions .......................................................................................................... 31 Electro-Static Discharge .................................................................................................. 37

Radiated Field Immunity ................................................................................................. 40 Electrical Fast Transients / Bursts .................................................................................... 43 Conducted RF Immunity.................................................................................................. 45

Appendix A – Client Provided Details ................................................................................ 48

Appendix B – EUT & Test Setup Photos ............................................................................ 51




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Report Scope

This report addresses the EMC verification testing and test results of the B601DE and

B601E, herein referred to as EUT (Equipment under test). The EUT was tested for

emission and immunity compliance against the following standards:

ICES – 003 Issue 4: 2004 / FCC Part 15 Subpart B: 2010

CISPR 22:2006

CISPR 24:1997

For a more detailed list of the standards and the revision used, see the “Applicable

Standards, Specifications and Methods” section of this report.




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Summary

The results contained in this report relate only to the item(s) tested. This report does not

imply product endorsement by any government, or Global EMC.

Equipment under test B601DE & B601D

EUT Passed all tests performed. Yes

Tests conducted by Min Xie

For testing dates see „Testing Environmental Conditions‟.




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Test Results Summary

Standard/Method Description Criteria Class / Level Result

CISPR 22 Mains Conducted Emissions N/A Class B Pass

CISPR 22 Telecom port conducted

emissions N/A Class B Pass

CISPR 22 Radiated Emissions N/A Class B Pass

IEC 61000-4-2 Electrostatic Discharge B 4kV Contact

8kV Air Pass

IEC 61000-4-3 Radiated Susceptibility A 3 V/m Pass

IEC 61000-4-4 Electrical Fast Transients B 500 V I/O Pass

IEC 61000-4-6 Conducted Susceptibility A 3 Vrms Pass

Overall Result PASS

If the product as tested complies with the specification or requirement, the EUT is deemed

to comply and is issued a „PASS‟ grade. If not „FAIL‟ grade will be issued. A pass

requiring modifications is denoted with a „*‟, and the modifications are listed in „Appendix

A – Client Provided Details‟.




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Justifications or Deviations

The following justifications for tests not performed or deviations from the above listed

specifications apply:

Surges are not performed on the EUT; as per manufacturer, telecommunication ports do not

connect directly to outdoor cable.

Power Frequency Magnetic field test was not performed on the EUT because the EUT does

not contain any devices susceptible to magnetic fields.

A later revision of the standard may have been substituted in place of the previous dated

referenced revision. The year of the specification used are listed under applicable

standards. Using the later revision accomplishes the goal of ensuring compliance to the

intent of the previous specification, while allowing the laboratory to incorporate the

extensions and clarifications made available by a later revision.

The B601D and B601DE are PCI and PCIe analog telephony cards respectively; they

belong to the B600 series of analog voice PCI and/PCIe cards. The “1” in the model name

denotes that the B600 has a T1/E1 daughter card and the D denotes that it has an echo

cancellation daughter card.

This report documents the testing of B601D and B601DE for tests listed in “Test Results

Summary.”

The following are other models representing the family:

B600

B600D

B601

B601D

B600E

B600DE

B601E

B601DE

The samples mentioned above were chosen as a representative sample of a fully configured

B600 analog voice card.




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Applicable Standards, Specifications and Methods

ANSI C63.4:2003 - Methods of Measurement of Radio-Noise Emissions from Low-Voltage

Electrical and Electronic Equipment in the Range of 9 kHz to 40 GHz

CFR 47 FCC 15: 2010 Code of Federal Regulations – Radio Frequency Devices

ICES – 003: 2004 Digital Apparatus – Spectrum Management and Telecommunications Policy

Interference Causing Equipment Standard

CISPR22:2006 - Information technology equipment – Radio disturbance characteristics – Limits

and methods of measurement

CISPR24:1997 -- Information technology equipment – Immunity characteristics – Limits and

methods of measurement

IEC 61000-3-2:2005 Limits for harmonic current emissions (equipment input current ≤16 A per phase)

IEC 61000-3-3:1995+A1:2001+A2:2005

Limits – Limitation of voltage changes, voltage fluctuations and flicker in public

low-voltage supply systems, for equipment with rated current ≤16 A per phase and

not subject to conditional connection

IEC 61000-4-2:2001 Testing and measurement techniques –Electrostatic discharge immunity test

IEC 61000-4-3:2002 Testing and measurement techniques – Radiated, radio-frequency, electromagnetic

field immunity test

IEC 61000-4-4:2004 Testing and measurement techniques – Electrical fast transient/burst immunity test

IEC 61000-4-5:2004 Testing and measurement techniques - Surge immunity test

IEC 61000-4-6:2003 Testing and measurement techniques – Immunity to conducted disturbances,

induced by radio-frequency fields

IEC 61000-4-8:2001 Testing and measurement techniques – Power frequency magnetic field immunity

test

IEC 61000-4-11:2004 Testing and measurement techniques – Voltage dips, short interruptions and

voltage variations immunity tests

ISO 17025:2005 - General Requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Document Revision Status

Revision 1 -June-07, 2009

- First Release




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Definitions and Acronyms

The following definitions and acronyms are applicable in this report.

See also ANSI C63.14.

AE – Auxiliary Equipment.

Class A device – A device that is marketed for use in a commercial, industrial or business

environment. A „Class A‟ device should not be marketed for use by the general public . A

„Class A‟ device should contain the following warning in it‟s user manual: “Warning:

This is a Class A product. In a domestic environment this product may cause radio

interference, in which case the user may be required to take adequate measures.”

Class B device – A device that is marketed for use in a residential environment and may

also be used in a commercial, business or industrial environments. A „Class B‟ device may

also be defined as a device to which a broadcast radio or television receivers would be

expected within a distance of 10 m of the device concerned.

EMC – Electro-Magnetic Compatibility

EMI – Electro-Magnetic Immunity

EUT – Equipment Under Test

ITE – Information Technology Equipment - has a primary function of entry, storage,

display, retrieval, transmission, processing, switching, or control, of data and of

telecommunication messages and which may be equipped with one or more terminal ports

typically operated for information transfer.

LISN – Line impedance stabilization network

NCR – No calibration required

RF – Radio Frequency

Test Plan – See „Appendix B – Client Provided Details‟. This should be made available

prior to testing.




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Testing Facility

Testing for EMC on the EUT was carried out at Global EMC labs in Toronto, Ontario,

Canada. The testing lab consists of a 3m semi-anechoic chamber calibrated to be able to

allow measurements on an EUT with a maximum width or length of up to 2m and height

up to 3m. The chamber is equipped with a turn table that is capable of testing devices up to

3300lb in weight. This facility is capable of testing products that are rated for 120 Vac and

240Vac single phase, or 208 Vac 3 phase input. DC capability is also available. The

chamber is equipped with an antenna mast that controls polarization and height from the

control room adjoining the shielded chamber. Radiated emissions measurements are

performed using a Bilog, and Horn antenna where applicable. Conducted emissions, unless

otherwise stated, are performed using a LISN and using the Vertical Ground plane.

Calibrations and Accreditations

The 3m semi-anechoic chamber is registered with Federal Communications Commission

(FCC, 612361), Industry Canada (IC, 6844A-1) and VCCI (R-2621 and C-2864). This

chamber was calibrated for Normalized Site Attenuation (NSA) using test procedures

outlined in ANSI C63.4 “Methods of Measurement of Radio-Noise Emissions from Low-

Voltage Electrical and Electronic Equipment in the Range of 9 kHz to 40 GHz”. The

chamber is lined with ferrite tiles and absorption cones to minimize any undesired

reflections. The NSA data is kept on file at Global EMC. For radiated susceptibility

testing, a 16 point field calibration has been performed on the chamber. The field

uniformity data is kept on file at Global EMC. Global EMC Inc is accredited to ISO 17025

by A2LA with Testing Certificate #2555.01. The laboratories current scope of

accreditation listing can be found as listed on the A2LA website. All measuring equipment

is calibrated on an annual or bi-annual basis as listed for each respective test.




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Testing Environmental Conditions and Dates

Following environmental conditions were recorded in the facility during time of testing –

Date Test Init. Temperature

(ºC)

Humidity

(%)

Pressure

(kPa)

Apr-16 – 28,

2010

RE MX 21-23 ºC 45 – 49 % 100 - 102

Apr-16 – 28,

2010

CE MX 21-23 ºC 45 – 49 % 100 - 102

Apr-16 – 28,

2010

ESD MX 21-23 ºC 45 – 49 % 100 - 102

Apr-16 – 28,

2010

RS MX 21-23 ºC 45 – 49 % 100 - 102

Apr-16 – 28,

2010

EFT MX 21-23 ºC 45 – 49 % 100 - 102

Apr-16 – 28,

2010

CS MX 21-23 ºC 45 – 49 % 100 - 102




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Detailed Test Result Section




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Power Line Conducted Emissions

Purpose The purpose of this test is to ensure that the RF energy unintentionally emitted from the

EUT‟s power line does not exceed the limits listed below as defined in the applicable test

standard, as measured from a LISN. This helps protect lower frequency radio services such

as AM radio, shortwave radio, amateur radio operators, maritime radio, CB radio, and so

on, from unwanted interference.

Limits & Method The limits and method are as defined in CISPR 22 and EN55022

Average Limits QuasiPeak Limits

150 kHz – 500 kHz 56 to 46 dBuV 150 kHz – 500 kHz 66 to 56 dBuV

500 kHz – 5 MHz 46 dBuV 500 kHz – 5 MHz 56 dBuV

5 MHz – 30 MHz 50 dBuV 5 MHz – 30 MHz 60 dBuV The limit decreases linearly with the logarithm of the frequency in the range 0.15 MHz to 0.50 MHz.

Note: If the Peak or Quasi Peak detector measurements do not exceed the Average limits,

then the EUT is deemed to have passed the requirements.

Both limits are applicable, and each is specified as being measured with a 9 kHz

measurement bandwidth.




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Typical Setup Diagram

Measurement Uncertainty The expanded measurement uncertainty is calculated in accordance with CISPR 16-4-2 and

is +/-3.6 dB with a „k=2‟ coverage factor and a 95% confidence level.

Preliminary Graphs Note the graphs shown below are for graphical illustration only. For final measurements

with the appropriate detector where applicable, please refer to the table. The graph shown

below is a peak measurement graph, measured with a resolution bandwidth greater than or

equal to the final required detector. These graphs are performed as a worst case

measurement to enable the detection of frequencies of concern and for considerable time

savings.




& CISPR 24/EN55024



L1 (Line)

120Vac @ 60Hz




& CISPR 24/EN55024



L2 (Neutral)

120Vac @ 60Hz




& CISPR 24/EN55024



L1 (Line)

230Vac @ 50Hz




& CISPR 24/EN55024



L2 (Neutral)

230Vac @ 50Hz




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Final Measurements Product Category Class B

Product B601

Supply 120Vac @ 60Hz

L1 (Line) - Quasi-Peak

Frequency (MHz)

Raw (dBuV)

Atten Factor (dB)

Cable Loss (dB)

LISN Factor (dB)

Level (dBuV)

Limit (dB)

Margin (dB)

Pass/Fail

4.02043 29.1 10 0.2 0.2 39.5 56 16.5 Pass

4.5783 28.3 10 0.2 0.2 38.7 56 17.3 Pass

3.78716 28.2 10 0.2 0.2 38.6 56 17.4 Pass

0.63072 28.9 10 0.1 0.2 39.2 56 16.8 Pass

3.04719 27.8 10 0.1 0.2 38.1 56 17.9 Pass

2.94297 27.4 10 0.1 0.2 37.7 56 18.3 Pass

L1 (Line) - Average

4.02043 19.7 10 0.2 0.2 30.1 46 15.9 Pass

4.5783 20.4 10 0.2 0.2 30.8 46 15.2 Pass

3.78716 18.5 10 0.2 0.2 28.9 46 17.1 Pass

0.63072 16.5 10 0.1 0.2 26.8 46 19.2 Pass

3.04719 16.2 10 0.1 0.2 26.5 46 19.5 Pass

2.94297 16.1 10 0.1 0.2 26.4 46 19.6 Pass

L2 (Neutral ) - Quasi-Peak

1.24132 24.2 10 0.1 0.2 34.5 56 21.5 Pass

1.05539 23.8 10 0.1 0.2 34.1 56 21.9 Pass

3.50598 23 10 0.1 0.2 33.3 56 22.7 Pass

0.64097 23.4 10 0.1 0.2 33.7 56 22.3 Pass

3.76612 22.1 10 0.2 0.2 32.5 56 23.5 Pass

2.33415 14.7 10 0.1 0.2 25 56 31 Pass

L2 (Neutral ) - Average

1.24132 9.4 10 0.1 0.2 19.7 46 26.3 Pass

1.05539 9.5 10 0.1 0.2 19.8 46 26.2 Pass

3.50598 11.1 10 0.1 0.2 21.4 46 24.6 Pass

0.64097 10.9 10 0.1 0.2 21.2 46 24.8 Pass




& CISPR 24/EN55024



3.76612 13.1 10 0.2 0.2 23.5 46 22.5 Pass

2.33415 8.9 10 0.1 0.2 19.2 46 26.8 Pass

Product Category Class B

Product B601

Supply 230Vac @ 50 Hz

L1 (Line) - Quasi-Peak

Frequency (MHz)

Raw (dBuV)

Atten Factor (dB)

Cable Loss (dB)

LISN Factor (dB)

Level (dBuV)

Limit (dB)

Margin (dB)

Pass/Fail

0.87675 30.3 10 0.1 0.2 40.6 56 15.4 Pass

0.35536 30.8 10 0.1 0.3 41.2 58.8 17.6 Pass

1.04978 29.4 10 0.1 0.2 39.7 56 16.3 Pass

1.56073 28.6 10 0.1 0.2 38.9 56 17.1 Pass

0.99272 29.9 10 0.1 0.2 40.2 56 15.8 Pass

4.22008 29.2 10 0.2 0.2 39.6 56 16.4 Pass

L1 (Line) - Average

0.87675 18.3 10 0.1 0.2 28.6 46 17.4 Pass

0.35536 19.6 10 0.1 0.3 30 48.8 18.8 Pass

1.04978 18.7 10 0.1 0.2 29 46 17 Pass

1.56073 17.7 10 0.1 0.2 28 46 18 Pass

0.99272 18.6 10 0.1 0.2 28.9 46 17.1 Pass

4.22008 18.3 10 0.2 0.2 28.7 46 17.3 Pass

L2 (Neutral ) - Quasi-Peak

3.60362 25.4 10 0.1 0.2 35.7 56 20.3 Pass

0.43607 26.3 10 0.1 0.2 36.6 57.1 20.5 Pass

2.76322 24.3 10 0.1 0.2 34.6 56 21.4 Pass

1.2419 24.5 10 0.1 0.2 34.8 56 21.2 Pass

2.48999 25.4 10 0.1 0.2 35.7 56 20.3 Pass

2.30617 23.9 10 0.1 0.2 34.2 56 21.8 Pass

L2 (Neutral ) - Average

3.60362 10.9 10 0.1 0.2 21.2 46 24.8 Pass




& CISPR 24/EN55024



0.43607 9.7 10 0.1 0.2 20 47.1 27.1 Pass

2.76322 9 10 0.1 0.2 19.3 46 26.7 Pass

1.2419 9.1 10 0.1 0.2 19.4 46 26.6 Pass

2.48999 10 10 0.1 0.2 20.3 46 25.7 Pass

2.30617 8.9 10 0.1 0.2 19.2 46 26.8 Pass

Note: See „Appendix B – EUT & Test Setup Photographs‟ for photos showing the test set-

up for the highest line conducted emission

Test Equipment List

Equipment Model No. Manufacturer

Last

calibration

date

Next

calibration

due date

Asset #

IFR Spectrum Analyzer AN940 IFR 12/29/2009 12/29/2011

GEMC 6350

LISN

FCC-LISN-50/250-16-2-

01 FCC 2009-02-11 2011-02-11 GEMC 65

RF Cable 7m

LMR-400-7M-50OHM-MN-

MN LexTec NCR NCR GEMC 28

RF Cable 1m



Attenuator 10 dB FP-50-10 Trilithic NCR NCR GEMC 42

This report module is based on GEMC template “CISPR22 – Power Line Conducted Emissions Class B_Rev1”




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Telecom Line Conducted Emissions


EUT‟s telecom line does not exceed the limits listed below as defined in the applicable test

standard, as measured from a Telcom LISN. This helps protect lower frequency radio

services such as AM radio, shortwave radio, amateur radio operators, maritime radio, CB

radio, and so on, from unwanted interference. This also protects other telecom equipment

from unwanted emissions which may degrade the overall performance of the network.

Limits & Method The voltage limits and method are as defined in CISPR 22 and EN55022

Average Limits Quasi-Peak Limits


500 kHz – 30 MHz 64 dBuV 500 kHz – 30 MHz 74 dBuV The limit decreases linearly with the logarithm of the frequency in the range 0.15 MHz to 0.50 MHz.

Shield Cable Limits

Current Limits



500 kHz – 30 MHz 20 dBuV 500 kHz – 30 MHz 30 dBuV

Voltage Limits



500 kHz – 30 MHz 64 dBuV 500 kHz – 30 MHz 74 dBuV The limit decreases linearly with the logarithm of the frequency in the range 0.15 MHz to 0.50 MHz.

Note: If the Peak or Quasi Peak detector measurements do not exceed the Average limits,

then the EUT is deemed to have passed the requirements. Current measurements were not

required as this measurement was performed with a T-LISN offering 150 ohm impedance.

Both limits are applicable, and each is specified as being measured with a 9 kHz

measurement bandwidth.




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Typical Setup Diagram




with the appropriate detector where applicable, please refer to the table. The graph shown

below is a peak measurement graph, measured with a resolution bandwidth greater then or

equal to the final required detector. The graph measurements are performed as a worst case

measurement to enable the detection of frequencies of concern and for considerable time

savings.




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Telecom Line (RJ11)

FXS Port




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Telecom Line (RJ11)

FX0 Port




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Telecom Line (RJ45)

PRI Port – Current Measurement




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Telecom Line (RJ45)

PRI Port – Voltage Measurement




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Final Measurements


Product B601


Port RJ11, FXS

Quasi-Peak

Frequency (MHz)

Raw (dBuV)

Atten Factor (dB)

Cable Loss (dB)

LISN Factor (dB)

Level (dBuV)

Limit (dB)

Margin (dB)

Pass/Fail

0.63031 41 10 0.1 9.9 61 74 13 Pass

0.62702 41.2 10 0.1 9.9 61.2 74 12.8 Pass

1.25513 39.8 10 0.1 9.8 59.7 74 14.3 Pass

0.2045 42.1 10 0.1 10 62.2 81.4 19.2 Pass

1.25413 38.5 10 0.1 9.8 58.4 74 15.6 Pass

23.85304 37.2 10 0.4 10.3 57.9 74 16.1 Pass

Average

0.63031 37.8 10 0.1 9.9 57.8 64 6.2 Pass

0.62702 38.5 10 0.1 9.9 58.5 64 5.5 Pass

1.25513 38.7 10 0.1 9.8 58.6 64 5.4 Pass

0.2045 34.3 10 0.1 10 54.4 71.4 17 Pass

1.25413 38.2 10 0.1 9.8 58.1 64 5.9 Pass

23.85304 35.6 10 0.4 10.3 56.3 64 7.7 Pass


Product B601


Port RJ11, FX0

Quasi-Peak

Frequency (MHz)

Raw (dBuV)

Atten Factor (dB)

Cable Loss (dB)

LISN Factor (dB)

Level (dBuV)

Limit (dB)

Margin (dB)

Pass/Fail

1.25664 44.7 10 0.1 9.8 64.6 74 9.4 Pass

1.88384 42.5 10 0.1 9.8 62.4 74 11.6 Pass




& CISPR 24/EN55024



0.62833 40.2 10 0.1 9.9 60.2 74 13.8 Pass

23.85343 37.4 10 0.4 10.3 58.1 74 15.9 Pass

18.20366 37.1 10 0.3 10.2 57.6 74 16.4 Pass

24.48276 37.1 10 0.4 10.3 57.8 74 16.2 Pass

Average

1.25664 30.8 10 0.1 9.8 50.7 64 13.3 Pass

1.88384 30.4 10 0.1 9.8 50.3 64 13.7 Pass

0.62833 30.2 10 0.1 9.9 50.2 64 13.8 Pass

23.85343 32.9 10 0.4 10.3 53.6 64 10.4 Pass

18.20366 28 10 0.3 10.2 48.5 64 15.5 Pass

24.48276 31.6 10 0.4 10.3 52.3 64 11.7 Pass


Product B601


Port PRI, RJ45 with shield cable

Peak with respect to Quasi-Peak Limit – Current Measurement

Frequency (MHz)

Raw (dBuV)

Atten Factor (dB)

Cable Loss (dB)

LISN Factor (dB)

Level (dBuV)

Limit (dB)

Margin (dB)

Pass/Fail

2.9105 19.8 10 0.1 0 29.9 30 0.1 Pass

9.7835 19.1 10 0.2 -0.1 29.2 30 0.8 Pass

0.5762 18.5 10 0.1 0.1 28.7 30 1.3 Pass

27.1523 17.9 10 0.5 -0.2 28.2 30 1.8 Pass

21.4082 17.9 10 0.4 -0.2 28.1 30 1.9 Pass

0.443 18.8 10 0.1 0.1 29 31 2 Pass

Average – Current Measurement

3.144 4.81 10 0.1 0 14.91 20 5.09 Pass

9.856 4.03 10 0.2 -0.1 14.13 20 5.87 Pass

0.5568 5.01 10 0.1 0.1 15.21 20 4.79 Pass

27.13 4.42 10 0.5 -0.2 14.72 20 5.28 Pass

21.353 5.48 10 0.4 -0.2 15.68 20 4.32 Pass

0.46584 4.62 10 0.1 0.1 14.82 20.6 5.78 Pass




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Peak with respect to Average Limit – Voltage Measurement

28.211 18.2 10 0.5 10.4 39.1 64 24.9 Pass

19.54 18.5 10 0.4 10.2 39.1 64 24.9 Pass

6.797 18.5 10 0.2 10 38.7 64 25.3 Pass

23.716 17.9 10 0.4 10.3 38.6 64 25.4 Pass

22.454 17.9 10 0.4 10.2 38.5 64 25.5 Pass

29.743 17.6 10 0.5 10.4 38.5 64 25.5 Pass


up for the highest line conducted emission

Test Equipment List


Last

calibration

date

Next

calibration

due date

Asset #

IFR Spectrum Analyzer AN940 IFR 12/29/2009 12/29/2011

GEMC 6350

LISN

FCC-LISN-50/250-16-2-

01 FCC 2009-02-11 2011-02-11 GEMC 65

TLISN T8-02 FCC 2009-06-22 2011-06-22 GEMC 126

TLISN Ethernet adapter T8-ALCL-1 FCC 2009-06-22 2011-06-22 GEMC 126

RF Cable 7m



RF Cable 1m




This report module is based on GEMC template “CISPR22 – Telecom Line Conducted Emissions Class A_Rev2”




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Radiated Emissions


EUT does not exceed the limits listed below as defined in the applicable test standard, as

measured from a receiving antenna. This helps protect broadcast radio services such as

television, FM radio, pagers, cellular telephones, emergency services, and so on, from

unwanted interference.

Limit(s) and Method The limits and method are as defined in CISPR 22 and EN55022

30 MHz – 230 MHz , 30 dBuV/m at 10m, 40.5 dBuV/m at 3m

230 MHz – 1000 MHz, 37 dBuV/m at 10m, 47.5 dBuV/m at 3m

Measurements above 1 GHz are not required as the device did not have clocks exceeding

108 MHz as listed in Appendix A.

This limit is specified as being measured with a 120 kHz measurement bandwidth and a

using a Quasi Peak detector.




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Typical Radiated Emissions Setup

Note: In accordance with CISPR 22 section 10.3.1, testing was performed at a 3 meter test

distance and an extrapolation factor of 10.5 dB was applied.




with the appropriate detector, please refer to the final measurement table where applicable.

The graph shown below is a maximized peak measurement graph, measured with a

resolution bandwidth greater then the final required detector and over a full 0-360 rotation.

This peaking process is done as a worst case measurement. This process enables the

detection of frequencies of concern for final measurement, and provides considerable time

savings.




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Vertical – Peak Emissions Graph




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Horizontal – Peak Emissions Graph




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Final Measurements Product Category Class B

Product Name B601

Supply 230Vac 50Hz

Quasi-Peak Emissions Table - Vertical

Frequency (MHz)

Raw (dBuV)

Antenna Factor (dB/m)

Cable RE Factor (dB)

Pre-Amp (dB )

Level (dBuV/m)

Limit (dB)

Margin (dB) Pass/Fail

100.456 57.2 8.8 0.5 -32 34.5 40.5 6 Pass

122.856 55.9 7.4 0.5 -31.9 31.9 40.5 8.6 Pass

229.348 54.2 11.6 0.6 -31.7 34.7 40.5 5.8 Pass

155.621 50.3 9.1 0.5 -31.9 28 40.5 12.5 Pass

167.468 52.5 9 0.5 -31.8 30.2 40.5 10.3 Pass

106.479 50.9 8.7 0.5 -32 28.1 40.5 12.4 Pass

Quasi Peak Emissions Table - Horizontal

167.392 58.2 9 0.5 -31.8 35.9 40.5 4.6 Pass

155.653 52.1 9.1 0.5 -31.9 29.8 40.5 10.7 Pass

163.82 58.1 9 0.5 -31.8 35.8 40.5 4.7 Pass

352.331 61 15.9 0.6 -31.4 46.1 47.5 1.4 Pass

172.024 50.5 9.2 0.5 -31.8 28.4 40.5 12.1 Pass

360.422 58.3 16.1 0.6 -31.3 43.7 47.5 3.8 Pass


up for the highest line radiated emission




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Test Equipment List

Equipment Model

No. Manufacturer

Last

calibration

date

Next

calibration

due date

Asset #

IFR Spectrum Analyzer AN940 IFR 12/29/2009 12/29/2011 GEMC 6350

BiLog Antenna 3142-C ETS 2009-02-12 2011-02-12 GEMC 8


Schaffner Preamp 9kHz -

2 GHz CPA9231A Schaffner 8/26/2008 8/26/2010 GEMC 116

RF Cable 7m



RF Cable 1m



RF Cable 0.5M

LMR-400-0.5M-

50OHM-MN-MN LexTec NCR NCR GEMC 31

This report module is based on GEMC template “CISPR22 – Radiated Emissions Class B_Rev1”




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Electro-Static Discharge

Purpose The purpose of this immunity test is to apply a static electricity discharge from the operator

to the EUT, or create a nearby discharge field. An example of can be seen in low humidity

when a person touches an object and creates is a small spark. This spark may be

potentially harmful to the operation of the EUT. Most real life discharges are „air‟ as

shown in the previous example. The „contact‟ method, with related reduced voltages, has

been shown to be roughly equivalent „air‟ in it is severity. „Contact‟ is the preferred

method due to its reproducibility. Contact method will be performed unless the discharge

point is significantly insulated and the insulation can not be easily broken through. This

test ensures a minimum level of immunity which is likely to occur. This test does not

guarantee that the EUT will not experience a higher level which may cause it to fail.

Application Level Requirement This test is performed in accordance with the methodology defined in IEC 61000-4-2. 25

hits in negative and positive polarity will be performed at each defined discharge point on

the EUT. These are called direct discharges, irrespective of contact or air being applied.

Also, Horizontal Coupling Plane (HCP) and the Vertical Coupling Plane(VCP) discharges

will be performed. These are called indirect discharges. For a picture representation of the

EUT discharge points, see Appendix B - EUT and Test Setup Photos. For a text

description of the EUT discharge points, see Appendix A - Client Provided Details. For a

EUT criteria description, see Appendix A - Client Provided Details.

A level of 4kV contact, or 8kV air where applicable, was applied to each defined discharge

point. Each level was ramped up by applying the lower levels first. Criteria level „B‟ as

defined in “Appendix A - Client Provided Details” was applied to this test, however all

anomalies are noted.




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Typical ESD Setup

Application Level Accuracy Contact discharge: +/- 15% as measured at tip.

Test Results The EUT passed the requirements. The EUT met Criteria B as defined in “Appendix A –

Client Provided Details”. No anomalies observed.

Location Test Voltage Discharge Type Pass / Fail

1. Expansion Slot

Cover +/- 4kV Contact Pass

2. RJ11

Connectors +/- 4kV Contact Pass

3. HCP & VCP +/- 4kV Contact Pass

4. FX0 & FXS

Cables +/- 8kV Air Pass




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Test Equipment List


Last

calibration

date

Next

calibration

due date

Asset #

Minizap ESD Simulator

Minizap Thermo Electron Corp

Feb. 11, 2009

Feb. 11, 2011

GEMC 1

ESD HCP 80CMX160CM Global EMC NCR NCR GEMC 50

ESD VCP 50CMX50CM1 Global EMC NCR NCR GEMC 51

ESD 470K A 2X470KOHM100CM Global EMC NCR NCR GEMC 52

ESD 470K B 2X470KOHM100CM Global EMC NCR NCR GEMC 53 This report module is based on GEMC report template „IEC61000-4-2_ESD_Rev1‟




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Radiated Field Immunity

Purpose The EUT will likely be exposed to intentional sources of RF energy during the EUTs

application. Sources of such radiations can be cellular phones, FM radio, television, remote

car alarms, garage door openers, and other broadcast transmissions. These sources of

radiations are licensed or certified for broadcast; hence the EUT should be immune to their

RF energy. This test gives the test levels that the EUT should be immune to in order to

assure the EUTs operation in expected field strengths. This test does not guarantee that the

EUT will not experience a higher level field during its‟ operation, which may cause the

EUT to fail.

Application Level Requirement This test is performed in accordance with the methodology defined in IEC 61000-4-3. The

immunity test is performed over the frequency range of 80 MHz to 1.0 GHz range.

Frequency steps used were calculated at 1% step size of the previous frequency, rounded

down to the nearest kHz, as the frequency range is ramped up. Known clock frequencies,

local oscillators, etc, shall be analyzed separately, these are defined in “Appendix B –

Client Provided Details”. The level applied to the EUT was calibrated at 3 V/m. A

modulation of 80% AM 1 kHz sine wave was applied during the application of the RF

energy at each frequency. Both horizontal and vertical polarization was applied. 4 sides of

the EUT were subjected to RF field. The dwell time used was 3.0 seconds. Forward power

was monitored, and kept on file at Global EMC Inc. An isotropic field probe was placed in

near proximity of the EUT to verify the application of the field. Criteria level „A‟ as

defined in “Appendix A – Client Provided Details” was applied to this test.

Input Voltage and Frequency 230V @ 50 Hz

Frequency range and signal strength 80 MHz – 1 GHz – 3 V/m (80% AM)

Sweep step 1% of fundamental.

Dwell time 3 s

EUT type Table top




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Typical Test Setup

Application Level Accuracy As per IEC61000-4-3, the RF field is specified as 0 to +6 dB for at least 12 of the 16

calibration points. For a 10 V/m field, this allows for the EUT to be subjected to a field of

10 V/m to 20 V/m with at least 75% coverage at this level.

Test Results The EUT passed the requirements of 3 V/m. The EUT met Criteria A as defined in

“Appendix A – Client Provided Details”. No anomalies were observed.




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Test Equipment List

Equipment Model No. Manufacturer Last

calibration date

Next calibration due date

Asset #

Signal Generator

SMT 03 Rhode and Schwarz

July 1, 2009 July 1, 2010 GEMC 2

BiLog Antenna

3142-C ETS Feb. 12, 2009 Feb. 12, 2011 GEMC 8

Horn Antenna

1 – 4.2GHz AT 4510 AR NCR NCR GEMC 26

Power Amplifier

150W1000 AR NCR NCR GEMC 23

Power Amplifier

10S1G4A AR Feb. 11, 2009 Feb. 11, 2011 GEMC 24

Power Head PH 2000 AR Feb. 11, 2009 Feb. 11, 2011 GEMC 15

Power meter PM 2002 AR Feb. 9, 2009 Feb. 9, 2011 GEMC 16

Field probe FL 7006 AR 2008-07-17 2010-07-17 GEMC 25

Field Mon. FM7004 AR NCR NCR GEMC 13 This report is based upon GEMC report template „IEC61000-4-3_RadiatedImmunity_Rev1‟




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Electrical Fast Transients / Bursts

Purpose

Electronic fast transients / bursts are simulated in this test on the supply and I/O lines of the

EUT. In a typical application environment, fast voltage disturbances may be injected into

these ports of the EUT. These signals usually arise from nearby switching circuitry such as

a light switch, relay bounces, electric motor noise, or other such electrical phenomenon.

The EUT should be immune to such disturbances. This test does not guarantee that the

EUT will not experience a higher level field during its operation, which may cause the

EUT to fail.

Application Level Requirement This test is performed in accordance with the methodology defined in IEC 61000-4-4. The

voltage waveform applied has the following characteristics:

Pulse rise time 5 ns ± 30%

Pulse duration (to 50% value) 50ns ± 30%

Pulse repetition frequency 5kHz (75 pulses per burst train)

Burst duration should be 15 ms ± 20%

Burst period should be 300 ms ± 20%

Bursts are applied for 1 minute each at positive and negative for each I/O line tested.

A test level of 500 V was applied to I/O lines via a capacitive coupling clamp. Lower levels

were evaluated by ramping up to the required level. Criteria level „B‟ as defined in

“Appendix A – Client Provided Details” was applied to this test.

Test Voltage Repetition rate Coupling Lines Result

+/- 0.5 kV 5 kHz FX0 Line Pass

+/- 0.5 kV 5 kHz FXS Line Pass

+/- 0.5 kV 5 kHz PRI Line Pass




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Typical Test Setup

Application Level Accuracy As per IEC61000-4-4, the level is specified as being within +/- %20. For an application

level of 1kV, this allows for the EUT to be subjected to 980 V to 1.2 kV.

Test Results The EUT passed the requirements. The EUT met Criteria B as defined in “Appendix A –

Client Provided Details”. No anomalies were observed.

Test Equipment List


Last

calibration

date

Next

calibration

due date

Asset #

Immunity generator

EMC Pro Plus

Keytek Thermo Corp

Feb. 13, 2009 Feb. 13, 2011 GEMC 4

CCL Clamp EMC Pro

Plus Keytek Thermo

Corp NCR NCR GEMC 5

This report module is based on GEMC report template „IEC61000-4-4_EFTB_Rev1‟




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Conducted RF Immunity

Purpose The EUT will likely be exposed to low frequency intentional sources of RF energy during

the EUTs application. Sources of such radiations can be AM radio, shortwave radio, CB

transmissions, and other low frequency broadcast transmissions. These sources of

radiations are licensed or certified for broadcast; hence the EUT should be immune to their

RF energy. Due to the properties of radio, the power or I/O lines on the EUT would likely

be the passive receiving antenna that induces the disturbance to the EUT. Since this is the

main method of coupling at this frequency range, the direct application of the RF energy to

the line being tested is used. At this frequency range and level, this method is easier to

produce and reproduce in a laboratory environment then subjecting the EUT to an

equivalent RF field.

Application Level Requirement This test is performed in accordance with the methodology defined in

IEC 61000-4-6. I/O cables were performed using a bulk current injection probe, and power

lines were tested using a CDN. The immunity test is performed over the frequency range of

150 kHz to 80 MHz. Frequency steps used were calculated at 1% step size of the previous

frequency, rounded down to the nearest kHz, as the frequency range is ramped up. Known

clock frequencies, local oscillators, etc, shall be analyzed separately, these are defined in

“Appendix B – Client Provided Details”. The level applied to the EUT was calibrated at 3

Vrms. A modulation of 80% AM 1kHz sine wave was applied during the application of the

RF energy at each frequency. The dwell time used was 3.0 seconds. A current probe was

placed between the coupling device and the EUT to verify the application of the RF energy.

Criteria level „A‟ as defined in “Appendix A – Client Provided Details” was applied to this

test.




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Typical Test Setup

Application Level Accuracy As per IEC 61000-4-6, the CDN must meet a common mode impedance |ZCE| = 150 Ω ± 20

Ω for 150 kHz to 26 MHz and |ZCE| = 150 Ω + 60 Ω or 150 Ω - 45 Ω for 26 MHz 80

MHz. During tests using the bulk current injection probe, the impedance of each cable will

affect the current injected, so current was monitored. The calibration performed according

to IEC 61000-4-6 allows for +/- 2dB.

Test Results The EUT passed the requirements. The EUT met Criteria A as defined in “Appendix A –

Client Provided Details”. No anomalies were observed.

Input Voltage and Frequency 230V @ 50 Hz

Frequency range and signal strength 150 kHz – 80 MHz – 1 Vrms (80% AM)

Sweep step 1% of fundamental.

Dwell time 3 s

EUT type Table top




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Test Equipment List

Equipment Model No. Manufacturer Last calibration date

Next calibration due date

Asset #

CDN CDN-M3 Vican Feb. 11, 2009 Feb. 11, 2011 GEMC 11

Power Amplifier 75A250A AR NCR NCR GEMC 14

RF Current probe

F-33-2 FCC Feb. 11, 2009 Feb. 11, 2011 GEMC 19

Bulk Current Injection Probe

F-120-9A FCC Feb. 11, 2009 Feb. 11, 2011 GEMC 20

Signal Generator

SMT 03 Rhode and Schwarz

July 1, 2009 July 1, 2011 GEMC 2

Power Attenuator 6 dB

100-A-FFN-06

Bird NCR NCR GEMC 48

This report module is based on GEMC report template „IEC61000-4-6_ConductedImmunity_Rev1‟




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Appendix A – Client Provided Details




& CISPR 24/EN55024



General Information

Manufacturer / Client Sangoma Technologies Inc.

EUT Model number B601D and B601DE

Equipment Category Residential

Basic EUT Functionality

Provide telephony connectivity

Input Voltage and

Frequency

PCI Voltage, DC

Connectors available on

EUT

3 RJ11 Connectors

1 RJ45 Connector

Peripherals Required for

Test

Loop Back Cables

PC running CentOS (Linux) to exercise the unit.

Release type Prototype

I/O cable description

Specify Type and length

Telephone wires

Ethernet Cable

Modes of operation

1. ON




& CISPR 24/EN55024



EUT Functional Description

EUT Configuration

Please see Appendix B for a picture of the unit running in normal conditions.

Cables and earthing were connected as per manufacturer‟s specification.

Operational Setup

These devices are required to be attached to the EUT for its normal operation.

One sample each of B601D and B601DE PCI and PCIe cards are plugged in client

provided computer.

Loop back cables are connected to each B601D and B601DE ports.

Modifications for Compliance

The following modifications were made during testing for the sample to achieve

compliance with the testing requirements:

Standard telephone wires are used to perform telecommunication line conducted emissions.

Client also provided telephone wires with ferrites near RJ11 jack; these wires with ferrites

and additional ferrites on the FX0 ports, Steward 28A2024-0A0, with four turns are used to

meet Class B radiated emission limits. See Figure 8 in Appendix B for photo of setup.

Criteria Description

Performance criterion A: During testing, normal performance as specified by the

manufacturer.

Performance criterion B: During testing, temporary degradation, or loss of function or

performance which is self-recovering.

Performance criterion C: During testing, temporary degradation, or loss of function or

performance which requires operator intervention or system reset occurs. This performance

criterion was not used during the application of immunity on this product.




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Appendix B – EUT & Test Setup Photos




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Figure 1: Power Line Conducted Emission Setup – Photo 1




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Figure 2: Power Line Conducted Emission Setup – Photo 2




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Figure 3: Telecommunication Conducted Emission Setup – RJ11




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Figure 4: Telecommunication Conducted Emission Setup – RJ45 Shield Cable

Current Measurement




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Figure 5: Telecommunication Conducted Emission Setup – RJ45 Shield Cable

Voltage Measurement




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Figure 6: Radiated Emission Setup – Photo 1




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Figure 7: Radiated Emission Setup – Photo 2




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Figure 8: Radiated Emission with additional ferrite setup – Photo 3




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Figure 9: ESD Setup




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Figure 10: Radiated Susceptibility Setup




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Figure 11: Electronic Fast Transient / Burst Setup – I/O Line




& CISPR 24/EN55024



Figure 12: Conducted Susceptibility Setup

Global EMC Labs EMC / EMI Test Report - Home - Sangoma · PDF file ·...

Documents

Transcript of Global EMC Labs EMC / EMI Test Report - Home - Sangoma · PDF file ·...