[email protected] Oh great, more PBL… Are we psychotic?! (Attempting) Implementing PBL...

18
gillian.hendry@strat h.ac.uk Oh great, more PBL… Are we psychot ic?! (Attempting) Implementing PBL in the Psychology Undergraduate Curriculum Gillian Hendry & Dr Sally Wiggins PBL Summer Workshop, University of Leicester, 7-9 July 2014

Transcript of [email protected] Oh great, more PBL… Are we psychotic?! (Attempting) Implementing PBL...

Page 1: Gillian.hendry@strath.ac.uk Oh great, more PBL… Are we psychotic?! (Attempting) Implementing PBL in the Psychology Undergraduate Curriculum Gillian Hendry.

[email protected]

Oh great,

more

PBL…

Are we psychoti

c?!

(Attempting) Implementing PBL in the Psychology Undergraduate Curriculum

Gillian Hendry & Dr Sally WigginsPBL Summer Workshop, University of Leicester, 7-9 July 2014

Page 2: Gillian.hendry@strath.ac.uk Oh great, more PBL… Are we psychotic?! (Attempting) Implementing PBL in the Psychology Undergraduate Curriculum Gillian Hendry.

@StrathUni_Gill @[email protected]

About us

Dr Sally Wiggins is a senior lecturer, specialising in Social and Discursive Psychology, and has been using PBL in teaching for around 7 years. To date, she has received two grants to develop PBL within the Psychology curriculum at Strathclyde.

I am a 2nd-year PhD student, funded by the HEA Doctoral Programme, looking at student interaction in PBL (stay tuned; more on this later!). I was the research assistant employed for the latter project, and also have recent experience (2010) of being a student in a PBL-taught class.

Page 3: Gillian.hendry@strath.ac.uk Oh great, more PBL… Are we psychotic?! (Attempting) Implementing PBL in the Psychology Undergraduate Curriculum Gillian Hendry.

@StrathUni_Gill @[email protected]

The project

£25,938 awarded for 18-month project (beginning May 2011), implementing PBL into the Psychology undergraduate curriculum

We couldn’t shift to PBL entirely, but aimed to help encourage student autonomy and engagement in learning

PBL in psychology relatively rare (Abertay, Leeds, Linköping); three years later, becoming more prevalent

Project based upon previous successful implementation of PBL in 4th year ‘Qualitative Methodologies in Psychology’ class (completely PBL-run for full semester)

Page 4: Gillian.hendry@strath.ac.uk Oh great, more PBL… Are we psychotic?! (Attempting) Implementing PBL in the Psychology Undergraduate Curriculum Gillian Hendry.

@StrathUni_Gill @[email protected]

The materials

The project aimed to design and implement PBL into at least one class in each year of the Psychology programme

Things don’t always go to plan! Scope of project was scaled down to accommodate restructuring of degree – instead, PBL components were introduced within a class

The final materials developed were as follows:1st year: ‘Wall of Fame’ problem (basic psychology

class)3rd year*: ‘MI5’ problem (Individual Differences class)3rd year: ‘Panoramic Productions’ problem (Social

Psychology class)4th year: ‘App-y Days’ and ‘Anarchy in the UEC’

problems (CHIP)

*I’ve not made a typo – no second year classes were converted to PBL!

Page 5: Gillian.hendry@strath.ac.uk Oh great, more PBL… Are we psychotic?! (Attempting) Implementing PBL in the Psychology Undergraduate Curriculum Gillian Hendry.

@StrathUni_Gill @[email protected]

Wall of Fame (1st year Psychology)

“You are a team of historians opening a new ‘History of Psychology’ museum, and have been allocated the period 1960-1970. What should be included?”

- Sessions took place over 3 x 1-hour sessions- Were expected to produce one slide of PowerPoint- In final session, class leader presented each of the

slides one by one, class voted

- 1st year students, new to PBL and to psychology, so problem seemed apt in that it gave an overview of psychological research

- 300+ in class, groups of 10 in tiered lecture theatre- GTAs as facilitators

Page 6: Gillian.hendry@strath.ac.uk Oh great, more PBL… Are we psychotic?! (Attempting) Implementing PBL in the Psychology Undergraduate Curriculum Gillian Hendry.

1960 – 1970:Age of political and social instability and change. Turning point in politics,

international relations, culture, science. Sense of going towards new, modern, shocking world. Growing interest in behaviour. Psychology studies become

“fashionable”.

The Milgram study, 1961;designed to measure people’s willingness to obey a higher authority, even if that comes into conflict with their conscience (superego)

Bandura’s “Bobo doll” experiment, 1961 and 1963; found that children exposed to violent scenarios are more likely to act in a physically aggressive way

Harlow and the rhesus monkeys, between 1957 and 1963; baby monkeys removed from mothers and “brought up” by surrogate mother replacements made of wire or wire and cloth. Partial and total isolation. Concludes importance of primary care giver in infants.

Atkinson’s multi-store model of memory, 1968 explains how memory works

Cognitive Psychology; Exploration of mental processes like thought, perception, memory, learning.

Cognitive Therapy seeks to help the patient by identifying and changing dysfunctional mental processes. Founded by Aaron T. Beck.

Star = unethical today; part of the search for shocking, modern change during 1960s

Anti-war movement/ Preoccupation with

war

Link to Nazism (holocaust), and Vietnam and Koran Wars; was there a shared perception of moral conduct amongst participants?

Study of roots of aggression and violence.

Exploration of new ideologies; communism, feminism, Hippies, Sexual Revolution…

Effects of maternal separation and institutionalisation.

Could link to memory loss and damage from war veterans

Led to

Interest in mental processes

Research done at this period led to today’s knowledge about child psychology and education and could be seen as the cause of modern moral codes such as the Nuremberg Principles, the law of war, and the lower percentage of violent TV

shown during the day.

Page 7: Gillian.hendry@strath.ac.uk Oh great, more PBL… Are we psychotic?! (Attempting) Implementing PBL in the Psychology Undergraduate Curriculum Gillian Hendry.

@StrathUni_Gill @[email protected]

MI5(3rd year Individual Differences)

Page 8: Gillian.hendry@strath.ac.uk Oh great, more PBL… Are we psychotic?! (Attempting) Implementing PBL in the Psychology Undergraduate Curriculum Gillian Hendry.

@StrathUni_Gill @[email protected]

MI5 (3rd year Individual Differences)

Instead of 5 x 1-hour lectures, student groups were given the same amount of time to produce a psychometric test

No previous knowledge of psychometric testing, so had to find out firstly, how to construct a test (Likert scales, reliability, validity, scoring), and secondly, what would be an appropriate trait to test for the personality type of someone wanting to work at MI5

- Groups of 5/ 6/ 7, 3rd year students- Tiered lecture theatre, but break-out rooms also- Class size roughly 100 students

Page 9: Gillian.hendry@strath.ac.uk Oh great, more PBL… Are we psychotic?! (Attempting) Implementing PBL in the Psychology Undergraduate Curriculum Gillian Hendry.

@StrathUni_Gill @[email protected]

App-yDays(4th year CHIP)

Page 10: Gillian.hendry@strath.ac.uk Oh great, more PBL… Are we psychotic?! (Attempting) Implementing PBL in the Psychology Undergraduate Curriculum Gillian Hendry.

@StrathUni_Gill @[email protected]

App-y Days (4th year CHIP)

Student groups to develop an app to help someone with schizophrenia, Asperger's syndrome or Alzheimer’s disease in an aspect of their every day life

Groups don’t need to know technical aspect, but should focus on psychological research into chosen condition, and design an app drawing on such research

- 4th (final) year students, groups of 4/ 5- 3 x 1-hour sessions- GTA facilitators

Page 11: Gillian.hendry@strath.ac.uk Oh great, more PBL… Are we psychotic?! (Attempting) Implementing PBL in the Psychology Undergraduate Curriculum Gillian Hendry.

@StrathUni_Gill @[email protected]

Initial Evaluation

Data was collected via questionnaires, focus groups, feedback via assignments

Basic feedback (quantifying responses) measured favourite aspects of PBL, what could be changed, study practices etc.

Basic statistical analysis of the Learning Process Questionnaire (Kember et al., 2004) revealed no significant difference in approaches to learning (deep/ surface), before and after partaking in PBL

Focus groups/ assignment feedback revealed students had both positive and negative views of PBL

Page 12: Gillian.hendry@strath.ac.uk Oh great, more PBL… Are we psychotic?! (Attempting) Implementing PBL in the Psychology Undergraduate Curriculum Gillian Hendry.

@StrathUni_Gill @[email protected]

Negatives

- Project was scaled down (from whole, 12 week classes) to much shorter PBL components

- Not all years got involved (no PBL in second year, due to staff resistance)

- PRACTICALITIES (room bookings, lack of access to computers, class sizes)

- Gripes about assessment

Why should she get the same grade as me

when she never put the work in?!

Page 13: Gillian.hendry@strath.ac.uk Oh great, more PBL… Are we psychotic?! (Attempting) Implementing PBL in the Psychology Undergraduate Curriculum Gillian Hendry.

@StrathUni_Gill @[email protected]

Negatives

“because it was not graded we did not feel

as though it was important as the other

work we had to complete at the same

time”

“it was hard to combine all of the information while pleasing all team

members”“some members of

the team didn’t perhaps contribute

as much”

“It was also difficult to hear other members of

the team due to the room we were in while

working as a team”

Page 14: Gillian.hendry@strath.ac.uk Oh great, more PBL… Are we psychotic?! (Attempting) Implementing PBL in the Psychology Undergraduate Curriculum Gillian Hendry.

@StrathUni_Gill @[email protected]

Positives

- (Many) Students found materials fun and interesting

- Appreciated the change from standard lecture format

- Enjoyed ‘real world-ness’ of problems

- Recognised benefits of self-centred teaching, as opposed to being taught

- Enjoyed the face-to-face contact with peersLOL this is so much fun!

Page 15: Gillian.hendry@strath.ac.uk Oh great, more PBL… Are we psychotic?! (Attempting) Implementing PBL in the Psychology Undergraduate Curriculum Gillian Hendry.

@StrathUni_Gill @[email protected]

Positives

“Problem based learning is, in my opinion, a very appropriate method of improving in group co-

operation and introduces an extremely fun oriented

environment”

“Although initially it seems as though all of our prior work was a

waste of time, we came to realise it was

in actual fact beneficial”

“I feel as a whole we worked well together and the sessions have definitely benefited my

overall learning”

“I found that it was good to have different perspectives and I felt

like we kept each other motivated”

Page 16: Gillian.hendry@strath.ac.uk Oh great, more PBL… Are we psychotic?! (Attempting) Implementing PBL in the Psychology Undergraduate Curriculum Gillian Hendry.

@StrathUni_Gill @[email protected]

Future plans…

Currently, unfortunately, we are back to square one. Although some of the PBL components carried into the following year, in academic year 2013/ 2014, all of them were dropped, due to factors mentioned previously

However, my PhD is looking at student interaction in PBL, so if we can understand more about the intricacies of what actually happens within the group setting, we will be better placed to support effective PBL implementation

Support teaching staff ‘afraid of the unknown’, time to develop materials, reassurance from other Psychology departments that it IS possible

Page 17: Gillian.hendry@strath.ac.uk Oh great, more PBL… Are we psychotic?! (Attempting) Implementing PBL in the Psychology Undergraduate Curriculum Gillian Hendry.

@StrathUni_Gill @[email protected]

So, are we psychotic for attempting this?!

Page 18: Gillian.hendry@strath.ac.uk Oh great, more PBL… Are we psychotic?! (Attempting) Implementing PBL in the Psychology Undergraduate Curriculum Gillian Hendry.

@StrathUni_Gill @[email protected]

AcknowledgementsUniversity of Strathclyde Education Excellence Fund for supporting the project

Staff and students (both willing and unwilling!)

Sally for paying me for seven months to have fun creating the materials!

Thank you for listening!