Learning Together, Working Together? Charlene Tait [email protected]
-
Upload
dacey-cameron -
Category
Documents
-
view
39 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Learning Together, Working Together? Charlene Tait [email protected]
Learning Together, Working Together?
Charlene Tait [email protected]
Background
• Multi-professional Postgraduate Study in autism (ASD)
• Established 1998
• Campus and outreach delivery
• 500 + participants to date
Why autism? Why Multi-professional(Jelly Babies by Brian James @ Meikeljohn illustration)
Student Composition Campus Cohorts2003-2004 to 2007 - 2008
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
2003-2004
2004-2005
2006-2007
2007-2008
Education
Health Sector
S.Work
Others
Parents/Individuals
Context
• Shift towards multi-professional working and training
• Development of National Training Framework for Autistic Spectrum Disorders (Mackay & Dunlop 2004)
• Policy flow & legislative drivers• The broader issue of inclusion
( Florian 1998)
Challenges
• Diverse needs of student body
• Range of experience of working with individuals with ASD
• Addressing needs of practitioners working with people across the lifespan
• Previous experience (or lack of experience ) of Multi-professional working
Opportunities
• Collaborative learning (Gokhale 1995)
• Development of common knowledge & common professional goals (Hutchings & Feaver 2002)
• Overcoming professional misconceptions
• Development of individual professional role
• Peers living with ASD
Approaches to Teaching & Learning in a Multi-professional Context - Concepts
• Ethos – Surrender the “expert” label but own your expertise
• Commit to knowledge exchange
• Reflect on roles – Teacher? Learner?
• Acknowledge the need for professional socialization (Wood 2000)
• Cultivate collaboration - core
• Social Constructivist “leanings”
Approaches to Teaching & Learning in a Multi-professional Context - Practice
• Action Learning Sets– case based collaborative tasks
• Peer Critique• Workshop approaches – task based work• Student directed work – learners as
teachers – “Co-educators”• Time to talk• Supported by a multi-professional
teaching team
Student Perceptions – Learning into Practice
I am confident in discussions with colleagues from various disciplines with regard to my knowledge about ASD and in suggesting various strategies”
Learning Disabilities Nurse
“Multi- Professional opportunities enhance greater understanding of support in different contexts”
Speech & Language Therapist
“... People come to me, even psychiatrists will come because they don’t know. I have referred people on for diagnosis, I recognise people coming in who have ASD”
Learning Disabilities Nurse
“… I needed general knowledge of ASD. The course helped me keep up with current research, I gained from the multi-professional dimension. It has changed aspects of my practice, I have developed as a professional… I have realised what kind of professional I want to be, there is not just one methodology, you need
to look at the bigger picture”
“All aspects (of knowledge and practice) needed developed. I had a little knowledge of Asperger’s syndrome from reading. It was vital that I did the course; I needed an understanding of ASD. It has all had an impact…the biggest thing is working with parents, listening to their point of view. It made me review the way I dealt with parents.”
Teacher
Student Perceptions – Learning and the lived experience of families
“I have increased my understanding of professional perspectives. The idea of a multi-professional, multi-agency team; you don’t really feel part of that as a parent. Now I feel I could be, I am more confident. I didn’t think I lacked confidence but now that it has increased I see that I did”
“I am not taking it personally anymore…I can see where he is coming from. I understand the psychology of it more”
“…I feel what I have to say is said with emotion, I am not just saying something that happens, there is a lot of feeling…there is a family, it is quite involved, there is pain, there is hurt…”
“…I see other parents fighting professionals all the time and I want to say, don’t do that. I know this is part of the guilt, I can see that process. Because I have been in the team with all the professionals I feel I can see the bigger picture. I can see it from both sides not just as a parent.”
Learning – Impact on strategic planning
Aberdeenshire Model:
• Course embedded in education authority ASD strategy
• Strong commitment to parental participation
• Development of local networks – Paired graduates supporting local initiatives
• E.g. support groups, training
Reflections & Conclusions
• Reflect on terminology? Shift from multi-professional to inter professional- emphasis on participation rather than presence
• Facilitation of “corporate” shift in thinking – individual construction of knowledge can lead to shared
• Process is crucial – content is the vehicle• Timing of exposure – professional
socialization, collaborative practice
• Value of “stakeholder” involvement
• Need for more detailed “Impact” research – perceptions of the consumers of services
• Transfer of principles into CPD, staff development and pre-service training
References
Florian, L. (1998) Inclusive Practice What, why, and how? In C Tilstone, L Florian & R Rose (Eds) Promoting Inclusive Practice. London: Routledge Falmer
Gokhale, A. (1995) Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education.7: 22 – 30.
Hutching, S. Feaver, S (2002) “Wedded”, “Bedded”, or “Simply Flirting” Teaching Forum.50:9 – 11
Mackay, T. & Dunlop, A W (2004) The Development of a National Training Framework For Autistic Spectrum Disorders. Glasgow: National Autistic Society
Wood, D F (2000) Inter –professional Education – Still More Questions than Answers? Medical Education 2001:35: 816