GANP/ASBU modules implementation monitoring process using LSSIP/ESSIP

GANP/ASBU modules implementation monitoring process using LSSIP/ESSIP

Danny DEBALSEUROCONTROL

Presentation 08 April 2014

Slides updated 11 April 2014 to take into account comments received by ATMGE/19 participants

ATMGE/19, Baku, Azerbaijan

Post meeting comment – the powerpoint as shown at the ATMGE has been updated as follows- Added list of abbreviations- Integrated (in a light manner) the separate presentation on the process- corrected some errors- Added post meeting comments

1. AIM OF THIS PRESENTATION

Pan-European Planning, Monitoring and Reporting 2

Apply agreement reached at EANPG Nov 2013

2a. WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR YOU?


If you are an ECAC State = it's a do nothing scenario for you

Why? See next slides on the ESSIP/LSSIP process) Who decided? EANPG + AAB

If you are not an ECAC State --> = the rest of the presentation is for you - I'll explain!

Austria

Belgium

Bulgaria

Cyprus

Czech Republic

Denmark

Finland

France

Germany

Greece

Hungary

Ireland

Italy

Latvia

Lithuania

Luxembourg

Malta

Netherlands

Poland

Portugal

Romania

Slovakia

Slovenia

Spain

Sweden

United Kingdom

Estonia

Croatia

Norway

Switzerland

Albania

Armenia

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Macedonia

Moldova

Monaco

Montenegro

Serbia

Turkey

Ukraine

Azerbaijan

Georgia

San Marino

Andorra

Belarus

Israel

Kazakhstan

Kyrgyzstan

Russian Federation

Tajikistan

Turkmenistan

Uzbekistan

EU (28 States)SES Performance Scheme (30 States)EUROCONTROL (40) + Estonia (1) = 41 States

ECAC (44) - Iceland (1) = 43 StatesICAO EUR Region (55 States)

ECAA Member

Iceland

Algeria

Morocco

Tunisia

ICAO EUR/NAT Office accreditation (56 States)

IAC Member

2b. WHO IS WHO?

3. WHAT SHOULD YOU DO?


In a nutshell: give us 'high level' data (5 lines) on the following 20 Objectives by 31 May at the latest. That's all we ask.

Post meeting comment – at the meeting, the deadline of 31 May has been changed

4. WHAT WILL WE DO WITH THE INFO? (1)


To answer this question I need first to explain you our ESSIP/LSSIP process and how it is applied to the 41 ECAC States since 20+ years



So how will this process serve ICAO GANP ASBU monitoring?


Post meeting comment – at the meeting, the deadline of 31 May has been changed, so this will affect the further schedule of activities. The presentation refers to the original May deadline.

5. DETAILS FOR EACH ASBU MODULE – TABLE (1)


Post meeting comment – some small modifications have been proposed to ICAO Paris for this table – once agreed, this will be added in the guidance text

5. DETAILS FOR EACH ASBU MODULE – Obj 01


EUROCONTROL Objective Coordinator: Adriatik KOKONA http://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/official-documents/guidance/nav10.pdf

Specific guidance: This objective requires the implementation of RNAV(GNSS) APV procedures based on APV/BARO and/or APV/SBAS. The primarily objective is to enhance safety but there are potential benefits in terms of reduced minima and better access to airports without precision approach and landing capability.

Example text: ”The Republic of ABC-nia will design and publish RNAV(GNSS) APV procedures at the following airports, names of the airports. The procedures will be based on APV/BARO and/or APV/SBAS. States aircraft will be equipped with the required equipment, the airworthiness and operational certificates will be issued by the Regulator. The completion date is planned for 12/2019.”



EUROCONTROL Objective Coordinator: Predrag VRANJKOVIC http://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/official-documents/guidance/aop04-1.pdf

Specific guidance: There are 4 important elements: Specify the type of surveillance equipment to be installed; Operating procedures; Vehicle tracking; Training

Example text: ”All surveillance equipment (e.g. SMRs, Multilateration) will be installed and operating by 06/2016. Procedures will be in place 6 months earlier. Vehicle tracking is foreseen to be fully operational on 04/2016. Personnel will be trained on the installed SMR and multilateration equipment by the same date. Training for maintenance personnel of vehicle transponders and operational staff will be finalised by 08/2016.



EUROCONTROL Objective Coordinator: Predrag VRANJKOVIC http://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/official-documents/guidance/aop04-2.pdf

Specific guidance: There are 3 important elements: Type of the alerting technology installed to enable detection and conflicts (HITT, RIMCAS, etc.); Approved procedures implemented; Training of aerodrome controllers in A-SMGCS Level 2 procedures

Example text: “The Airport ABC is planning to install alerting technology (e.g. Park Air NOVA 9000 RIMCAS) by 06/2018. Procedures will be defined and approved by the same date. Training of aerodrome controllers in A-SMGCS Level 2 procedures will commence as early as 01/2017, and it is planned to finish by end of 2017.”



EUROCONTROL Objective Coordinator: Luca DELL’ORTO http://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/official-documents/guidance/atc17.pdf

Specific guidance: The State/ANSP should indicate specifically which ones of the messages identified in the description of ATC17 are (going to be) used operationally, and with which neighbouring States/ANSPs. If only sub-groups of the lists presented in the objective are implemented, this should be specified

Example text: “The Republic of ABC-nia will implement operationally the following OLDI messages (PAC, COD, COF, MAS, TIM) between its ATSU ‘xyz’ and ATSU ‘hjk’ in neighbouring State CBA-nia, by December 2017”



EUROCONTROL Objective Coordinator: Luca DELL’ORTO http://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/official-documents/guidance/ity-cotr.pdf

Specific guidance: The objective includes two distinct elements:- the exchange of flight data for the purpose of notification, coordination and transfer of flights (Notification, initial coordination, revision of coordination, etc). The State/ANSP should indicate specifically which ones of the messages identified are (going to be) used operationally, and with which neighbouring States/ANSPs. - requirements for the transmission of parameters (Logon Forward and Next Authority Notified) which are linked specifically to the implementation of Datalink (VDL2). These can be simply discarded if VDL2 is not in the plans of the concerned State/ANSP

Example text: “The Republic of ABC-nia will operationally the following processes (Notification, Initial Coordination, Revision, Abrogation of coordination) between its ATSU ‘xyz’ and ATSU ‘hjk’ in neighbouring State CBA-nia, by December 2017”



EUROCONTROL Objective Coordinator: Oscar ALFARO http://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/official-documents/guidance/ity-fmtp.pdf

Specific guidance: The aim of this reporting is finding out which communication protocol is being used for the exchange of flight plan messages between ACCs (if any), and when will these be migrated to IPv6. The report should address communications infrastructure, systems and operational links within the State (make a generic statement if the list is too long) and with each neighbouring State (ACCs).

Example text: ”Commissioning of new FDPS systems took place at X and Y ACC in April 2011. These systems support both FMTP and X25 for the notification, coordination & transfer data connections. There are plans to implement FMTP based on IPv6: the XX-YY IPv6 connection is installed and tested but not yet operational (planned for Q3/2014); the XX-ZZis currently a IPv4 connection and will be migrated to IPv6 in Q4 2014”



EUROCONTROL Objective Coordinator: Ana Paula FRANGOLHO http://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/official-documents/guidance/inf04.pdf

Specific guidance: The Integrated Briefing allows a flexible and tailored provision and presentation of data which are required during the pre-flight phase for the preparation and execution of a flight. It comprises access to various data/information sources such as AIS, ARO, MET and ATFM which provide NOTAM, SNOWTAM, MET messages, FPL and related messages or ATFM messages. The data is provided and presented into one package.

Example text: “Implementation of Integrated Briefing is completed. AIS, FPL, MET and ATFM information are integrated into one single source. Internet briefing is also available at the AIS Site. Meteorological Information is integrated in the AIS Briefing since Dec 2013.”




Specific guidance: States have to ensure that all concerned aircraft in the State Registry are equipped with certified ACAS II equipment. Moreover, ANSPs have to ensure that the training for ATCOs is up-to-date so that they are aware of the features of ACAS II Change 7.1 (which includes improved RA reversal logic and new instructions to pilot: (https://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/tcas-ii-version-71).

A monitoring of the performance of ACAS should be established by means of regular occurrence reporting (incident reports/ACAS reports), investigation and analysis.

Example text: ”The Republic of ABC-nia has done all necessary actions (a.o. monitoring of ACAS occurrences as described in PANS-ATM). In addition it will, by end 2014, update the training of operational staff to include ACAS II (TCAS II change 7.1).



EUROCONTROL Objective Coordinator: Ingrid FEIJT http://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/official-documents/guidance/atc02-2.pdf

Specific guidance: Ensure integration of the STCA Safety Net in the national regulation and take appropriate regulatory actions at national level (inspections and safety surveys) to ensure the timely implementation by the respective Stakeholder (ANSPs, Military). Also ensure clear allocation of roles and responsibilities to create conditions for successful teamwork to perform the required action in the areas of e.g. Training, Procedures and Capabilities.

Example text: “A new STCA was introduced in the fallback ATC system in June 2006 and in the primary ATC system in January 2007. The implementation of this Objective as an operational improvement is now completed by the Republic of ABC-nia. The STCA system has been verified against and found to be in compliance with the respective EUROCONTROL Specification. ATCOs have been trained on the new STCA.”




Specific guidance: Ensure integration of the Area Proximity Warning (APW) Safety Net in the national regulation and take appropriate regulatory actions at national level (inspections and safety surveys) to ensure the timely implementation by the respective Stakeholder (ANSPs, Military). Also ensure clear allocation of roles and responsibilities to create conditions for successful teamwork to perform the required action in the areas of e.g. Training, Procedures and Capabilities.

Example text: “Area Proximity Warning (APW) is not yet introduced in the Republic of ABC-nia. Due to the low levels of traffic, it appears not cost effective. Only within the ACC of XY it might be implemented – this is being studied for the moment – more information on this is due to be available end 2014.”




Specific guidance: Ensure integration of the Minimum Safe Altitude Warning (MSAW) Safety Net in the national regulation and take appropriate regulatory actions at national level (inspections and safety surveys) to ensure the timely implementation by the respective Stakeholder (ANSPs, Military). Also ensure clear allocation of roles and responsibilities to create conditions for successful teamwork to perform the required action in the areas of e.g. Training, Procedures and Capabilities.

Example text: “Because of technical problems with the current systems, Minimum Safe Altitude Warning (MSAW) is not yet introduced in the Republic of ABC-nia. However there are concrete plans to introduce it by end 2017.”



EUROCONTROL Objective Coordinator: Predrag VRANJKOVIC http://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/official-documents/guidance/aop05.pdf

Specific guidance: Most important elements: MoU/ LoA between partners at the airport on information sharing; Establishing airport KPIs and monitoring of the airport performance; and procedures for pre-departure sequencing, turnaround process, adverse conditions situations (including de-iceing), exchange of Departure Planning Information (DPI message - in case of future creation of regional Network Manager)

Example text: “The airport ABC is planning to implement CDM by (date). The CDM MoU is in preparation and will be signed by all partners at the airport by (date). The MoU will clearly define responsibilities for each partner. Target of block time procedure (TOBT) will be implemented by (date). Pre-departure sequencing procedure will be implemented by (date). Airport performance will be reviewed and measured every 6 months. Adverse Conditions procedures will be implemented by (date)”.



EUROCONTROL Objective Coordinator: Luca DELL’ORTO http://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/official-documents/guidance/atc07-1.pdf

Specific guidance: specify which airport is served by AMAN; If there is co-ordination across the border (e.g. AMA message is sent to neighbouring ANSP for coordinating arrival into your airport); and if you receive AMA messages for coordinating flow of arrivals into a neighbouring State/airport

Example text: “The Republic of ABC-nia will implement basic AMAN at airport XYZ by 12/2020. Coordination with neighbouring State/ATSU ‘CBA-nia/sdf’ for exchange of AMA messages planned to be in place by 12/2019.”




Specific guidance: It includes, where relevant, support for AMAN operations involving airports located in adjacent ATSUs (i.e. your State may implement extended AMAN to serve an airport in a neighbouring State)

Example text: “The Republic of ABC-nia will implement extended AMAN for flows into airport XYZ by 12/2020. Coordination with neighbouring State/ATSU ‘CBA-nia/sdf’ for exchange of AMA messages will be in place by 12/2019.”



EUROCONTROL Objective Coordinator: Agnieszka DYBOWSKA http://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/official-documents/guidance/aom19.pdf

Specific guidance: Establish a collaborative civil-military airspace planning based on: integrated and dynamic ASM/ATFCM process supported by automated tools, fully introducing the FUA concept, with proper agreements at all levels (LoAs). The goal is to allow Airline Operators (AOs) to optimise their flight planning in order to achieve a more efficient utilisation of available airspace through more dynamic responses to specific short notice or real-time airspace status changes, requirements and route optimisation at the pre-tactical and/or tactical levels.

Example text: “Integrated civil/military system in ABC-nia is under development while the core features are already implemented. FUA procedures for booking TSAs are well established (according to appropriate LoAs) and are managed by an AMC. GAT flights via active TSAs are available in accordance with submitted FPL conditions and upon clearance given by civil ATCO first coordinated with military unit. A web based tool for automation of airspace bookings will be implemented in 2015.”



EUROCONTROL Objective Coordinator: Adriatik KOKONA http://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/official-documents/guidance/nav03.pdf

Specific guidance: This objective is an interim step on the path toward a global RNAV environment based on Performance Based Navigation concept and is aimed at providing short term operational benefits to aircraft equipped with appropriately approved RNAV equipment.

Example text: ”The Republic of ABC-nia will design and publish on its AIP, SIDs and STARs P-RNAV procedures at the following TMAs/Airports: XX, YY and ZZ. In addition, training of all Air Traffic Controllers and upgrading of the existing ATS systems will ensure the availability of information regarding RNAV equipage of the aircraft. The completion date is planned for 2018.



EUROCONTROL Objective Coordinator: Octavian CIOARA http://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/official-documents/guidance/fcm01.pdf

Specific guidance: This Objective is not applicable “per se” by non-EUROCONTROL States, as FCM01 implies exchange of data with the Network Manager in Brussels. The Objective should be paraphrased and its principles applied to non-EUROCONTROL States: the set-up of regional/sub-regional tactical flow management services and provision of real time data exchanges between the local ATC systems and a regional/sub-regional function, enhancing these services. The exchange of data would address the provision of Flow Management data from the regional/sub-regional services to the local systems and the provision of flight activations and estimates from the local ATC systems to the regional/sub-regional services.

Example text: “The Republic of ABC-nia has no plans to implement ATFM at regional/sub-regional level nor will it support with appropriate exchange of data. Overall no such regional/sub-regional ATFM is planned in the region.”



EUROCONTROL Objective Coordinator: Octavian CIOARA http://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/official-documents/guidance/ity-spi.pdf

Specific guidance: This Objective aims to improve the interoperability of surveillance data and to create the prerequisites for the deployment of new surveillance technologies. It also addresses the carriage of specific avionics by IFR/GAT flights (Mode S ELS, EHS and ADS-B Out). It is derived from a SES Regulation applicable in the European Union.

Example text: “The Republic of ABC-nia will deploy a surveillance infrastructure based on Mode S / Multilateration / ADS-B. The surveillance data exchanged between surveillance systems will be subject to an agreed data format. Implementation is foreseen by 2020.”



EUROCONTROL Objective Coordinator: Bernd HILL http://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/official-documents/guidance/env01.pdf

Specific guidance: This typically requires partnership agreements for the implementation of CDO signed between the Airport Operator, ANSP, Airlines and the Communes in the surrounding area of an Airport. All partners should be fully involved in the introduction of CDO. The ANSP should redesign the TMA Airspace to apply CDO Procedures. CDO techniques should be integrated into ATCO Training. Airlines equip their aircraft to fly CDO procedures, which are published in the AIP. A noise and track keeping system should be used to monitor CDO Performance. CDO Procedures are monitored by an Environment Unit at the ANSP or at the Airport Operator.

Example text: “The Republic of ABC-nia has implemented CDO on airport X1 and X2 from 07:00 hours to 21:00 hours. Extension for a 24 hours basis is foreseen by 2015. All airlines are applying CDO and CDO approaches are published in the AIP.”



EUROCONTROL Objective Coordinator: Adriatik KOKONA http://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/official-documents/guidance/ity-agdl.pdf

Specific guidance: This objective requires the implementation of the first set of en-route non time critical air-ground data link services DLIC, ACL ACM and AMC. It applies to all flights operating as general air traffic in accordance with instrument flights rules above FL 285. It is derived from a SES Regulation applicable in the EU

Example text: “The Republic of ABC-nia has not yet plans to deploy the required infrastructure and systems to support the air-ground data link, and therefore will not be ready to provide all the above mentioned services to aircraft flying within its airspace.”

6. PRACTICAL MODALITIES (1)


The template + this presentation should be sufficient for you to do the work.

They are available on our website



The entire PEPR Team is available to assist

But specifically dedicated are:Agnieszka, Predrag, Danny

+ Sven and Elkhan at ICAO Paris

Post meeting comment – all info on these 5 persons is on the guidance website



Nominate a Focal Point E-mail the filled-in document - most preferably in English - to above

coordinates. End May is the deadline. Preferably earlier. If you wish to use the Web Tool, let us know very soon. At the end of this

slideshow is explained how to gain access.


7a. OVERALL…


Do not reinvent the hot water - there's a process in ECAC since 20+ years: use it

Keep it straightforward and simple: for non-ECAC States only high level explanation asked.

Do it the next 2 months. We can further explain .. But basically this presentation should help you

already a long way. Do not aim for perfection ..!


7b. OVERALL… the words of the Commission


Avoid duplication of work - as we have experience with the monitoring for the ATM Master Plan (of which ESSIP is a part) we would like to use this tool.

The information to be added from States outside ECAC, can be limited to what is needed for ICAO.

We want ICAO to take an active role in stimulating these other States to contribute with information.

The ICAO report to be made should not be delayed, but based on what is available by the set deadline.

With this type of information the EUR region can make a good contribution to the global level, both regarding the tool as to the amount of information.

8. FAQ (1)


1. What if I cannot give all info by end May? A: give us what you have - Rome is not built in one day

2. Objectives are very complex - should I read the entire ESSIP Plan? A: no - see the short examples here above

3. What if we will implement later then the foreseen dates?A: that's the aim of monitoring: to see the real facts!

4. What if the information I have is only partial? Should I still send it to you by end May, or should I delay it awaiting for full info? Or, any possibility to amend info after end of May if more data is availableA: Even if it is partial, we (ICAO) need the info. Mark the parts that are not yet final – see some example texts. As of June, any further updates would be part of a next update cycle – tbd when and how etc – depending on the success of this cycle.


8. FAQ (2)


5. What’s in it for me – why should I do all this? A: it’s an ICAO requirement .. But more .. It gives you the possibility to look “in the neighbours garden” we propose that as of early June all those that have contributed to the exercise will get Read/Only access to the info of all other States (including ECAC States)

6. OTHERS?...

9. List of abbreviations (1)


AAB Agency Advisory Board ACAS Airborne Collision Avoidance System ACC Area Control Centre ACL ATC Clearances ACM ATC Communications Management ADEXP ATS Data Exchange Presentation ADS-B Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast AFSG Aeronautical Fixed Services Group AGDL Air Ground Data Link AIDC ATS Interfacility Data Communications AIMTF Aeronautical Information Management Task Force AIP Aeronautical Information Publication AIRB Airborne AIS Aeronautical Information Services AMA Area Minimum Altitude AMAN Arrival Manager AMC ATC Microphone Check ANSP Air Navigation Service Provider AOM Airspace Organisation & Management AOP Airport Operations AOs Airline Operators APV Approach with Vertical Guidance APV/BARO Approach with Vertical Guidance / Barometric APV/SBAS Approach with Vertical Guidance / Satellite-Based Augmentation

System APW Area Proximity Warning ARO Air Traffic Services Reporting Office ASBU aviation system block upgrade ASM Airspace Management A-SMGCS Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System ATCO Air Traffic Controller ATFCM Air Traffic Flow and Capacity Management ATFM Air Traffic Flow Management ATMGE Air Traffic Management Group-East ATSA Air Traffic Situational Awareness ATSU Air Traffic Services Unit AU Airspace User AWOG All Weather Operations Group

CBA Cost Benefit Analysis CCO Continuous Climb Operations CDM Collaborative Decision Making CDO Continuous Descent Operations COD SSR Code Assignment COF Change of Frequency COG Coordination Group COTR Coordination and Transfer DLIC Data Link Initiation Capability DMAN Departure Manager DPI Departure Planning Information ECAA European Civil Aviation Area ECAC European Civil Aviation Conference EHS Enhanced Mode S surveillance ELS Mode S Elementary surveillance ENV Environment ESSIP European Single Sky ImPlementation EU European Union FCM Flow and Capacity Management FDPS Flight Data Processing System FIR Flight Information Region FL Flight Level FMTP Flight Message Transfer Protocol FOC Full Operational Capability FPL Flight Plan FUA Flexible Use of Airspace GANP Global Air Navigation Plan GAT General Air Traffic GNSS Global Navigation Satellite System HITT Holland Institute of Traffic Technology IAC Interstate Aviation Committee ICAO EUR/NAT ICAO European / North Atlantic Region IDP Interim Deployment Programme IFR Instrumental Flight Rules IPv4 Internet Protocol version 4 IR Implementing Rule ITP In-trail Procedure ITY Interoperability

9. List of abbreviations (2)


ITP In-trail Procedure ITY Interoperability KPI Key Performance Indicator LOA Letter of Agreement LSSIP Local Single Sky ImPlementation MAS Manual Assume of Control Message MET Meteo METG Meteo Group MLAT Multilateration MoU Memorandum of Understanding MSAW Minimum Safe Altitude Warning NAV Navigation NM Network Manager NOTAM Notice to Airmen OLDI On-Line Data Interchange PAC Preliminary Activation message PANS-ATM Procedures for Air Navigation Services - Air Traffic Management PBN Performance Based Navigation PBNTF PBN Task Force PEPR Pan European Planning, Monitoring and Reporting P-RNAV Precision RNAV QMS Quality Management System RA Resolution Advisory RDGE Route Development Group Eastern Region RIMCAS Runway Incursion Monitoring and Conflict Alert System RNAV Area Navigation SES Single European Sky SID Standard Instrument Departure SMR Surface Movement Radar SNOWTAM NoTAM on SNOW Conditions SSR Secondary Surveillance Radar STAR Standard Terminal Arrival Route STCA Short Term Conflict Alert TCAS Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System TIM Transfer Initiation Message TMA Terminal Control Area TOBT Target of block time TSA Temporary Segregated Area VDL VHF Voice and Data Link VSA Visual Separation on Approach

Useful Links

Guidance for ICAO GANP monitoring

http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/guidance-material

(select tab «ICAO»)

EUROCONTROL Team

http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/essiplssip-team

ESSIP/LSSIP information

http://www.eurocontrol.int/pepr

European Implementation Planning and Reporting 43

Additional slides

Get OneSky Online account Get access to LSSIP Database

Additional slides – get OneSky Online account (1)


1. Go to eurocontrol website

2. Select «OneSky Online Extranet»

3. Select «Register for OneSky Online»



4. Fill in5. Get this screen



6. Click on link in received mail

7. So to get this screen

8. Wait a while:



9. Back to «OneSky Online Extranet»Now fill in your Login ID and

Password

10. So you have now access to the OneSky

Online

Additional slides – get access LSSIP DB (1)


11. Now request access to the LSSIP Database,

by sending e-mail to [email protected]

or [email protected] [email protected]

11. Do not forget to mention your One Sky OnlineUse Id (or Logon Id)

+ which State you wish to modify



12. Once you get mail back, refresh «OneSky

Online Extranet», so you will see LSSIP/IDP

Database

Click on it…

13. This is the home screenof the LSSIP Data base.

Click on «Local Implementation»



14. And here is the main screen to work with the LSSIP Data base.As this specific user has only Read/Write access to Uzbekistan,

he will automatically be put on this input page.

GANP/ASBU modules implementation monitoring process using LSSIP/ESSIP

Documents

Transcript of GANP/ASBU modules implementation monitoring process using LSSIP/ESSIP