FINAL REPORT - Minnesota
Transcript of FINAL REPORT - Minnesota
FINAL REPORT
CONTRACT SPA 7103
,Characterization of Hydrous Minerals in
the Duluth Complex Copper-Nickel Study Area
by
Paul W. WeiblenIII
Robert J. Stevenson
) / )' • I
This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page(s)
Abstract
Introduction
ii
----------------------------- 1 - 3
Products and Results of the Study
1.
2.
3.
Collection and cataloguing of rock samples,
sawed slabs, and polished thin sections.
Photography of sawed rock slabs.
Petrographic examination of polished thin
4 - 5
5 - 16
sections. ---------------------------- 16 - 20
4. Electron Microprobe analyses of selected
minerals. ---------------------------- 21 - 22
5.
6.
A.
B.
C.
Systematic and manipu1abe computer files
of numerical data. -----------------------.----',~-.
First order analysis of the'~of the
mineralogic data. ----------------------
Occurrence of asbestiform amphibo1e.-----
Relationship between structure and copper
nickel minera1ization.--------------------
Emplacement and cooling history of in
dividual intrusions. --------------------
22 - 23
23
24 - 28
29
29
D. The nature and extent of reaction between
the contact (and included) rocks and the
Duluth Complex magmas. ------------------ 29
i
ABSTRACT
The immediate product and results of the hydrous mineral study fall
into six categories: 1) A catalogued collection of 980 rock slabs, and
~450 polished thin sections. 2) A catalogued collection of 1300 color
and black and white photographs of the sawed rock slabs, thin sections,
and hand samples. 3) Data from 360 petrographic determinations of
minerals in the 450 thin sections. 4) 60 electron microprobe analyses
of individual minerals in 20 representative polished thin sections. 5)
A systematic and manipulable set of computer files of all the numerical
data associated with categories 1-4. 6) A first-order analysis of the
data available in categories 1-5 presented in this report. In addition,
the material and information in the six categories above have provided
a new basis for the following on-going studies of problems associated
with copper-nickel mineralization in the Duluth Complex: A) The
relationships between asbestiform and nonasbestiform amphibole in the
hydrous mineral occurrences. B) The relationship between structure and
copper-nickel mineralization. C) The emplacement and cooling history of
individual intrusions. D) The nature and extent of reaction between the
contact (and included) rocks and the Duluth Complex magmas.
ii
INTRODUCTION
Alth~ugh initiated" to provide the first systematic analysis of
hydrous minerals in rocks £rom the" Duluth Complex, the: Hydrous Mineral
study (Contract SPA#7l03) evolved into a ~jor sample collection activity.
This was a result of the £act that AMAX Shaft sample ( 1250 rock samples
from 174 rounds and 225 rock slabs 1 Decame available duri.ng the course
of the study. In the view of the principal invest.igator, preservation
of this sample is a landmark in the on-going studies of the Duluth Com
plex. It provides a unique 500 meter vertical section of gabbro.
Because of the coarse average grain size of the gabbro and centimeter to
meter scale mineralogic and textural variations (Weiblen & Cooper, 1977),
drill core samples tend to be nonrepresentative whereas the 10 kilogram
individual samples provide excellent material for combined bulk chemical,
electron-microprobe, and petrographic analyses.
The AMAX Shaft samples will be stored in a permanent collection in
The Mineral Resources Research Center at the University of Minnesota.
The rock sample, sawed slab and polished thin section numbers have all
been crossed referenced in the computer catalogue file (Appendices I and
II). Thus these samples will be readily accessible for future studies.
The initial visual inspection of the AMAX Shaft samples by Robert
Stevenson during the course of cataloguing, slabbing, and sectioning of
samples resulted in the discovery of the trace occurrences of distinctly
asbestiforrn amphibole in the. gabbro. Asbestiform amphibole has been
shown to be associated with an increase in cancer occurrence (Zoltaii
1977).
The importance of the recognition of actual asbestiform amphibole
in contrast to the more common bladed or massive textured amphibole in
1
the Duluth Complex rocks cannot.be overemphasized. First of all, it has
:made it possible -for Stevenson. to direct his studies' toward establishi.ng
objective criteria for rec?gniz~hg this type of. amphibole in air and
water samples. Secondly, it establishes the nature of occurrence of
this potentially hazardous mineral in mineralized rocks, and provides
criteria for recognizing occurrences by visual examination of rock sur-
faces (This is discussed further in a separate section of this report).
Finally/ based on the total surface area of rock examined by Stevenson
in the course of this study, it may be concluded that at the INCa, AMAX,
u. S. Steel, and Dunka Pit localities the occurrence of visible asbesti
6form amphibole is rare (0.50 gms in 5 x 10 gros of gabbro) and associat-
ed with rare em-sized cavities in mineralized rocks.
If the AMAX Shaft samples are representative, asbestiform amphibole
occurs at levels of less than 0.1 parts per million by weight in Einer-
alized parts of the Duluth Complex. As discussed below, major occur-
rences cannot be ruled out, but at least the criteria are available for
monitoring this potential environmental hazard during any developmental
or mining operation. This aspect of the hydrous mineral study is being
pursued by Robert Stevenson in a PhD. thesis in the Department of Geology
and Geophysics at the University of Minnesota and results will be made
available as the thesis research progresses.
Along with the expanded role that collection and preservation of
the AMAX sample assumed, a number of products and results in addition to
characterization of hydrous ~nerals emerged during the course of this
study. They may be conveniently categorized as follows:
1. A catalogued collection of rock samples, sawed rock slabs,
and polished thin sections.
2
2. A cata~ogued collection of color and blackandwhite
pho~ographs o£ sawed'rock:slabs, thin sections, and hand
samples
3.' Data £rom petr.ographic: examination o£ polished thin
sections.
4. Data from electron microprobe analyses.
5. A set o£ systematic and manipulable computer £iles
o£ the numerical data £rom categories 1-4 above.
6. A £irst-order analysis of the data available in cat~gories
1-5 above.
Each o£ these categories will be discussed separately below.
The new infornation on the Duluth Complex rocks sheds light on the
following aspects of the on-go~ng studies of the copper-nickel minerali
zation in the Duluth Complex:
A) The relationships between asbestiform and nonasbestiform
amphibole in the hydrous mineral occurrences.
B) The relationship between structure and copper-nickel ~eraliza
tion.
·C) The emplacement and cooling history of individual intrusions.
D) The nature and extent of reaction between the contact (and
included) rocks and the Duluth Complex magmas.
3
PRODUCTS AND RESULTS OF THE STqDY
1. Collection and cata~ogll~g o£ rock samples, sawed slabs,'and pol
ished thin sections.
Procedures
Because o£ the apparent textural and ~neralogic variation of
Duluth Complex rocks on a centimeter to meter scale (Weiblen & Cooper,
1976) representative sampl~ng has been a recurring problem in laboratory
studies of Duluth Complex rocks. For this study random sampling tech
niques at selected sites '~a_s': deemed the best procedure.
At the AMAX site, samples were selected from the sha£t round
samples (a waste pile £rom a 2 Eeter thick section of the 4 IDeter
diameter sha£t) by throwing a looped rope on the waste pile. An approxi
mately 18 kgm sample set which consisted of 1-10 blast fragments was
collected from each round. Samples were collected by the Dept. of
Natural Resources (DNR) and delivered to the University of Minnesota.
At the Dunka Pit site samples of similar size to the AMAX shaft
samples were collected by DNR. A visual selection of unmineralized
gabbro was made for one set of samples (DP900l) and mineralized sampl~s
for another set (DP9002).
The U.S. Steel sample set consists of samples of similar size to
the AMAX samples. The samples were collected by DNR from the U.S. Steel
mill sample.
The INCO Pit sample set was taken from a minus three IDesh (1-2
em-sized fragments) fraction of the INCO mill sample obtained by the
Mineral Resources Research Center at the University of ~nnesota.
Each individual sample £ragment was visually examined by Bob
4
Stevenson. Features such as contacts between coarse and fine grained
rock types or .major c~nges in :mineral proportions were noted and slabs
were cut o£ representative sample £~agments. The approximately one
centimeter thick sawed slabs .. were, numbered and examined visually to
select representative areas for diamond drill coring £or thin sections.
One inch diameter thin sections were made £rom cores o£ the different
rock types noted in the initial examination.
Product
The unused rock samples and the 980 rock slabs, at the date o£
submission o£ this report, are stored in the sub basement of Pillsbury
Hall at The University of Minnesota. Arrangements have been Eade £or
permanent storage at The Mineral Resources Research Center (MRRC) at the
University. The 450 polished thin sections are presently in use in The
Electron Microprobe Laboratory in the Microscopy Center in The Space
Science Center at the University of Minnesota and will also be permanent
ly stored with the rock slabs.
A sample computer printout of cross-referenced rock samples, slabs
and thin sections is presented in Appendix 1.
The sample, sawed slab and thin section numbers are cross refer~
enced in the computer file listed in Appendix 1.
2. Photography of Sawed Rock Slabs.
Procedure
The sawed rock slabs were photographed under water with a 35 rum
camera before thin section cores were removed to provide a permanent
record of the textural relations of individual thin sections to the tex
tures apparent on the larger (generally 5-20 em-sized) rock slabs.
5
Fig. 2-1. Examples of AX9001-lean ore
A. Slab photograph of average lean ore.
B. Slab photograph of average lean ore.
c. Slab photograph of average lean ore with chlorite veins ..
Fig. 2-2. Examples of US9001 disseminated ore.
A. Slab photograph of average ore, note gram-size variation.
B. Slab photograph of average ore, note gram-size variation.
c. Detail of (B) •
Fig. 2-3. Examples ofAX9002 upper shaft disseminated ore.
A. Slab photograph of average ore.
B. Detail of (A).
c. Slab photograph of highly altered average ore.
Fig. 2-4. Examples ofAX9003 lower shaft disseminated ore.
A. Slab photograph of average ore.
B. Slab photograph of average ore.
C. Detail of (B).
Fig. 2-5. Examples ofAX9005 disseminated ore from A drift.
A. Slab photograph of average picrite (inclusion?)
B. Slab photograph of average gabbro.
C. Detail of (B).
Fig. 2-6. Examples of DP9002 disseminated ore from Erie pit.
A. Slab photograph of average ore.
B. Slab photograph of average ore.
C. Detail of (B).
6
Fig. 2-7. Example of IP9003 disseminated are from Maturi shaft.
Fig. 2-8. Examples ofAX9004 semi-massive are from A drift.
A. Slab photograph of average are.
B. Slab photograph of high sulfide gabbro.
c. Slab photograph of mineralized hornfels.
14
(
Product
The 1300 color and black:and white phot,ographs'.-o£ ,.rock slabs along
with notes on visual ninera~ogic,identificationand,texturalclassifica
tion referred to in the previous" section will be outlined with the perm
anent rock sample collection in .MRRC. Examples of typical textures from
eight sample sets are illustrated in ~ig. 2-1,8.
A sample computer printout of ,cross-referenced listings of rock
slab, thin section, and Scann~ng Electron Microscope pho~ographs is
presented in Appendix 2. The cross-referenced catalogue of pho~ographs
and the associated computer file is listed in Appendix II.
3. Petrographic Examination of Polished Thin Sections.
Procedures
Preparation of polished thin sections for petrographic analysis
consisted of surfacing 25-30 individual one inch cores at a time from
the rock slabs on a Vibratory lap down to 1000 mesh. Cores were cement
ed with epoxy on one inch diameter glass discs. Cores were then cut on
a diamond saw and the sections were thinned to 40 Jrlicrometers. The
sections were then thinned by hand to the standard 30 .micrometer thin
section thickness. The sections were then polished to a one micrometer
surface on a rotary lap with one .micrometer diamond paste on a Buehler
micromet lapping material.
Optical examination of the polished thin sections was made on a
Leitz petrographic .microscope. Optical identification of transparent
minerals was made using the optical properties of index of refraction,
~xtinction, birefringence, optic axis angle for biaxial ndnerals, and
optic sign. One hundred to a thousand point identifications (counts) of
16
ninerals were.~de on O.S.to.l.S'em. squar~Erids on each polished thin
section. These data are presented'. and cross referenced in Appenaix III.
The point count data provides data: on relative ~eral proportions by
area. Assum~g that the ~nerals'are urtif6rmily and isotropically
distributed, the data also, give directly the volume 6nodal) proportions
(modes) of the minerals. Because of the small scale variations of
mineralogy and textures (Weiblen and Cooper, 1977) associated with the
processes o£ melt/crystal ~egregation discussed in section 6 below this
assumption is not very good for gabbroic rocks. However initial selec-
tion of thin section cores was nade to obtain representative sections of
the rock slabs in each set o£ sections from the rock slabs.
Results
Optical determinations from the point counting as well as recon-
naissance examination of the 4S0 polished thin sections resulted in the
identification of the following hydrous minerals:
A) Sericite - a fine-grained (l-S micrometer) inte.rgrowth o£
muscovite in plagioclase. This type of hydrous alteration
of plagioclase is ubiquitious in rocks containing plagioclase
which have reacted with water or fluorine. A reaction of the
following type may be involved:
((qtJ~ s.~ 08 -l'hQ45'3Ur) ((C/ Q.I; s,~ uf - /Jc; OI':J'J L{)Plagioclase + water = plagloclase + muscovite + quartz + ions
(K bearing) (K tree)3 KC./ 5,'3 0d' + H).O;;i? KfJ/
35'3 O,o(<J 1/); ~ 2k+.. 0 H - +' S ,'02..
B) Mafic Amphibole - Hornblende is the most common variety of this
mineral group in the Duluth Complex rocks. It occurs intergrown
with plagioclase, clinopryoxene, sulfides and oxides. It is
17
possible to form. hornblende £rom olivine, orthopyroxene, or
pl.agioclase and clin~pyroxene (plus or .minus· iron-titanium oxides).{i't..-
and water at temperatures~in the range of 200~.C up.ta~griatic
temperatures of about ·lOOOoC. The hornblende..may have ..fonned
therefore by direct crystallization from the~gma or .by sub
solidus reaction. An illustrative sub solidus reaction Eay be
written as follows:
Magnetite+Ca-p~agioclase+ clinopyroxene + water =
hornblende + Na-plagioclase
F(;A +-/l!aaJS1Q t-2{Q(~ 11'J)S.~ 0, H-I, o~)Io ~z (fl>-J )J!J)stllS:74,pf.Jl+ y,q
Actinolite-This amphibole is associated with clinopyroxene and
hornblende in altered rocks and may have formed by the following
reaction:
Clinopyroxene + water + CO = Actinolite + calcite + quartz0- Ca(k.)A~)S,'J..Oft:,+- J-.J;l. O+3Coz ~C~( F-eJ n,\_S,g42iOJl)z.r3 Co(~""'2S,'0z.
Cumrningtonite-Similar to the clinopyoxene-actinolite association,t,
cummingtonite is found with olivine in altered rocks, which suggestS
the following reaction:
Olivine + Quartz + water = cummingtonite7 (Fe, /t-J;)l.S,'D4 + q 5 :0) + 2 J./). 0;;:: 2 F-e7 S :t0Z-1. (0/-1),It is interesting to note that in the last two reactions
postulated above, formation of actinolite releases silica, whereas
formation of cummingtonite requires additional silica.
Actinolite is more common than cummingtonite (Appendix 3) whiCh
suggests that hydrous alteration of the mineralized rocks may have
occurred with only the addition of water and di~~t involve any
significant addition or loss of silica.
The .three varieties of mafic amphibole described above have not
been distinguished in the modal tabulation in Appenix 3, but the
relative proportions are recorded in the original archived data.
C) Fibrous Amphibole - This occurrence of actinolite is described
separately in Section A of this report.
D) Chlorite - This hydrous sheet silicate is found in reation relation18
with olivine and plagioclase and other hydrous minerals. The former
occurrence suggests the reaction:
co + H2O + Plagioclase + Olivine = Chlorite + calc~te + quartz2c~ t-4l{ot 2 CQ~S/~ O¥t-2(F~~)z S,'0..f;;: (~)A1J4C!-14S.~O,cJ(OHld f 2 Ca(~ ffS: 0zThe actual chloritic material analyzed thus far is intermediate in
composition between serpentine and chlorite (Appendix 4).
E) Serpentine - The occurrence of the high-magnesium variety of this
hydrous silicate has not been confirmed thus far by electron micro-
probe analyses (Appendix 4). The occurrences listed in the modal
data (Appendix 3), identified on the basis of optical properties
may all be septachlorite (This identification problem is being
pursued by Stevenson! Prior to this study, serpentine was con
sidered a likely common hydrous mineral based on the possible
reaction:
F)
Olivine + water = Serpentine + iron oxides~ '1 (:dml/~);;"D.4 t 4l-b.o ~ A#g" S:40,o(OI-l)J 1-21;,3°4 +25:0z.
Idingsite - This. general term has been used for optically indeterminate
hydrous alteration of olivine. Some refinement of this identification
will be come from Stevenson's studies.
G) Talc - The occurrence of this hydrous silicate with olivine and
serpentine may be related to introduction of CO along with water in2
mineralized rocks or the specific temperature and pressure
at which water reacted with olivine or orthopyroxene (Deer,
Howie, and Zussman, 1966, p. 229). Introduction of CO2 after
formation of serpentine could form talc by the reaction:
H)
C02 + Serpentine = talc + carbonate + water3 cu2 rl/?(,;, 5'4 ~cJ(()II);y :;;- /tlt?S'440 (0")2 BMJLUJ t 31-1>.0
Epidote - At Least two varie~ies of this mineral group, common
epidote and allanite (Appendix 3) occur along fractures in
association with plagioclase. They could form by the hydration
19
and oxidation of plagioclase containing a small amount of iron
in substitution for calcium (Appendix 4):
Oxygen + Fe bearing Ca-p1agioc1ase + water = epidote
In addition to the hydrous minerals listed above calcite, quartz,
and cordierite were also indentified in the optical examination and point
count studies of the polished thin se~tions. It will be noted from the
reactions postulated above, that the amount of calcite and quartz may
reflect the extent to which CO and silica were introduced into contact2
zone rocks when hydration occurred. Cordierite is a common constituent
of contact zone hornfels and occurs in association with hyperstene and
plagioclase in rocks which were probably derived from Virginia Formation
argillites (Renner, 1969). The cordierite may contain some water in
its structure (Be1trame, 1977).
4. Electron Microprobe Analyses of Selected Minerals.
Procedures
Subsequent to the optical examination and point counting
of individual polished thin sections, selected examples of typical
textural occurrences of the major"anhyrous silicate minerals, the
different hydrous minerals, and sulfides were photographed in each
polished thin section in preparation ~or electron microprobe analyses.
Photomicrographs of the entire thin sections were also made for
location purposes. These photographs are currently on file in
the Electron Microscopy Center in the Space Science Center at the
~University of Minnesota. They will be made a part~Ehe permanently
archived data with the electron microprobe analyses and polished
thin sections.
Electron microprobe analyses were made on an automated
Model 400 Materials Analysis Company electron microprobe with
operating conditions of 20 kilovolts electron beam voltage,
.015 microamperes of beam current, and 20 second counting intervals
on the peak of K alpha x-ray lines and 10 second counting intervals
below and above the peak for background corrections. x-ray intensities
corrected for background were reduced to chemical composition using
mineral standards similar in composition to the material being
analyzed•• The procedure is described by Grant and Weiblen (1971).
The specific standards used are listed in the archived data with
the original intensity data.
Results
At the end of the Contract Period (January 31, 1978) 60
21
analyses for Si, Al, Fe, Mg, Ca, Na, K, Ti, P~ Mn, and Cr were
completed. Each analysis consists of at least three replicate
analyses in the raw data for each element on each of the 60 mineral
grains. The data are tabulated ~ Appendix 4. Ana.lyses for
olivine and plagioclase in the AMAX samples indicates a narrow
range in Fe and Mg in olivine as has been found in previous analyses
of the INca Pit samples and elsewhere in the contact zone of the
Complex (Weiblen and Morey, 1976). A wider but still restricted
range of Ca and Na in plagioclase was found. The significance of
this restricted variation and the exceptions are discussed in
Section 6 of this report. Analyses of amphibole and biotite show
a range of compositions similar ·to that found in the INca Pit
samples also (Weiblen and Morey, 1976).
The initial analyses of presumed septechlorite and serpentine .F
are pUZZling (Appendix i). Further analyses are underway as a
part of Stevenson's study and the ongoing analytical program of the
Minnesota Geological Survey on Duluth Complex rocks.
5. Systematic and Manipulable Computer Files of Numerical Data.
Procedures
A sample numbering system outlined in Appendix 5 was devised
by Stevenson to provide complete cross-referencing of all the data
in the four categories above. Programs to handle the cross-referencing
make use of aocompatible file system. The files may be accessed(
by batch processing input/output or on time-sharing terminals. The
or~ginal data is preserved on archived computer cards.
22
Product
A copy of the each of the computer programs to enter, record,
and manipulate the various data is presented in Appendix 5.
6. First Order Analysis of the Mineralogic Data
Collection of the data presented in Appendices 2 - 4 on
the different types of hydrous minerals and their distribution in
different samples was the prime objective of this study. However
it is now possible to calculate bulk compositions of a large number
of individual rock samples (Appendix 3), and this makes it possible
to estimate the overall range and construct preliminary petrogenetic
models for the variation in the mineralogy of mineralized rocks in the
Duluth Complex. Such an exercise must be an iterative one because
the quality and quantity of data determine in part the validity of the
results and the results in turn affect the methods used in subsequent
data collection. Based on the data obtained in this study it is
now possible to attempt for the first time to realistically estimate
the overall range of variation in mineralogy and construct constrained
petrogenetic models for formation of the mineralized rocks in the
basal zone of the Duluth Complex. This attempt is currently under
way and will be published in a Symposium volume on sulfide mineral
ization in mafic rocks edited by T. Naldrett and to be published by
the Geological Society of Canada in August, 1978.
A. Occurrence of Asbestiform'Anphibo1e
The asbestiform' amphibole £ound in an AMAX shaft sample {Round·
#144, 919 ft.} occurs in and adjacent to cavities ~.ig. AlA). Calcite and
prehnite are associated with the amphibole.' Vermiculite, chlorite,
biotite, p1agic1ase, and apatite are also present in the sample.
The asbestiform amphibole occurs as an epitaxial growtaon bladed
amphibole and both varieties are seen to be overgrown by and adjacent to
calcite (Fig. A-I-B).
In hand speciman and thin section the asbestiform amphibole is white
while the bladed variety is green (Fig.A-IC). Compositionally, (Fig. A-2).
the green variety has more A1 0 10%) than _the'~it~asbestiforro variety
r;':::L~~~:;;.['~"~":_~---_._--..--------" "~~'and thus it is a Chornblende,r while the other has a low ( 5%) A1 0 con--" __.~ 2 3
tent and it is an actinolite. MnO is also different between the two
varieties, being higher in theL~h~t-;__ ~cti~;lite '(
The occurrence in cavities and association with calcite, provides
explicit criteria for monitoring the occurrence of asbestiforrn amphibole
in field, shaft, and any eventual mine wall exposure.
24
Fig. A-I.
A. Handsample AX42K showing amphibole association with calcite.
B. SEM view of calcite with asbestiform and nonasbestiformamphibole.
c. Transmitted light photograph. of the epitaxial relationsbetween green hornblende and white actinolite.
Fig. A-2.
A. Energy dispersive trace of white actinolite.
B. Energy dispersive trace of green hornblende.
25
(
Fig. A-I-A.
Fig. A-I-B
Fig. A-I-C.
27
B. Relationship between Structure and Copper-Nickel Mineralization.
A recently completed structural study of the Hoyt Lakes- Kawishiwi
Area of the Duluth Com~lex by Cooper (1978),provides a basis for eXamin~ng
in detail the effect of faulting on mineralization. The modal data obtained
fin this study on hydrous minera1s.abundance provides a data base for
(
comparative studies of the relative abundance of hydrous minerals in rocks
exposed in the vicinity of faults mapped or inferred by Cooper. Such
studies will be needed to monitor the sources of amphibole in air and
water samples and they will also add to our understanding of the relationship
between hydrous alteration and copper-nickel mineralization.
C. The Emplacement and Cooling History of Individual Intrusions
As experimental calibration of the reactions postulated in Section 3
improves and the specific reactions can be better estimated from analyzed
data and improved textural interpretations, it will be possible to estimate
the temperatures and pressures at which the hydrous alteration
occurred. This will help to answer the question whether the sulfide
mineralization occurred independently of the hydrous alteration.
D. The nature and Extent of Reaction Between the Contact (and Included)
Rocks and the Duluth Complex Magmas
The data obtained in this study is being used in part in a Masters
Thesis study (Churchill, 1978) of the extent of equilibration of Duluth
Complex rocks with an external source of oxygen.
29
CALCULATED BULK COMPOSITIONS BASED ON MODAL DATA
NORMALIZED TO THE SKAERGAARD CHILLED MARGIN COMPOSITION
Data from Appendices 3 and 4
,~
M!k-( UJd/ TO n..fl5. ;'(7v¥Cf ~I ~TITLE/H(I)/Y(l)/~(I)
FEO ~GO CAO ~Ain
9.63 ~.6211.3~ 2.37
KZO TIO£:: P205
o
TOTAL
99.97
F
o
-0-0
CL
.01
C H20+ C02
-0 -0 -0
.01 .25 .01
-0
S
.28
-0
Co
.03
-0
FE
.50
-0
NI
.10
-0
CU
.06
-0 -0
.16 .02
H~IOC~2U3
-0,-0-0
.25 1.17 .1,1
-0-0-("-I)-0 -0
sln2AL203I~
.Of! 17.22
~
C"J
~ <::::) ~ t( A 1\ PIJc.o -r--
(.-., ex:::>
o 1.12 .01 .46 .03
AMAX AVE. CAL. COMPOSI5ITn~S
AXIAvE 44.9q 17.11 14.05 6.12 9.78 2.63 .~] 1.36 .04 .25 .03 .31 .04 1.18
AX2AVE 44.44 l~.u~ 13.82 6.3M H.52 2.73 .99 1.13 .O~ .25 .02 .39 .03 1.52
o .89 o .39 .02 o
o
o 100.00
o 99.98
AX3AVE 42.03 15.06 18.32 7.60 ~.04 2.03 .79 1.05 .U3 .28 .02 .58 .09 1.77 .01 1.39 o .87 .01 o o 100.01
AX4AVE 37.4~ J3.76 9.92 5.9~ 5.7J 1.97 .7? 1.01 .U5 .20 .02 1.23 .1112.81 .04 B.55 .31 .15 o o o 99.99
AXSAVE 41.83 ]2.67 20.0810.81 6.e9 2.04 .57 1.QA .14 .35 .02 .54 .06 1.13 o .95 o .83 o "0 .01 100.00
DPIAVE 44.b4 17.98 15.20 6.39 H.88 2.84 .92 1.55 .UR .25 .02 .05 .04 .46 o .32 o .36 .01 o o 99.99
DP2AVE 43.18 13.uO 13.63 7.8 4 10.70 2.15 .75 1.36 .03 .29 .06 .52 .20 3.53 .02 2.51 .02 .20 o o a 99.99
IP2AVE 44.91 18.95 12.63 6.01 ~.61 2.90 .93 .53 .02 .23 .01 .58 .09 1.68 .01 1.33
IP3AVE 43;52 ]8.23 13.72 6.13 8.30 2.89 .69 .83 .01 .24 .01 .73 .04 2.38 .01 ].82
o .53 .04
o .42 .03
o
o
o 99.99
o 100.00
USIAV~ 44.81 17.~1 13.77 6.7~ B.78 2.87 .84 .96 .03 .25 .02 .36 .OR 1.32 .01 1.01 o .30 0 o o ~OO.OO
RATIOS Z<!) =SA~PLE Mt'-! FE "~G T1 Sl :AL CA tlA K p s CU NI FM CO CR OH CO CL F C
AX1AVt:
AX2AVt:
1.5~ 1.4b .71 1.16 .94 .9~ .86 1.11 3.24 .40 3.24 4.92' .41 2.36
1.56 1.44 .74 .97 .92 1.O~ .75 1.15 3.96 .60 4.08 6.19 .31 3.04
o 1.50 1.56
o 1.00 1'.84
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
-0
-0
AX3AVt. 1.75 '1'.911 .88 .90 .87 .p.7 .71 .86 3.16 .70 5.0S 9.21 .93 3.54 .36 1.00 3.48 .36 o o o -0
AX4AVr. 1.2~ 1.n3 .69 .87 .78 .80 .50 .83 2.89 .50 31.1919.59 1.1425.701.43 1.00 .60 1.43 o o o -0
AX5AVE 2.19 2.09 1.25 .92 .b7_ .74 .bl .86 2.28 J.40 3.45 8.57 .62 2.26 o 1.00 3.32 o o o o -0
1.~1 1.42 .91 1.16 .90 .7b .94 .9] 3.00 .30 9.13 8.26 2.07 7.06 .71 3.00 .80 .71
OPI A Vt:.
OP2AvE
1.5~ 1.5~ .74 1.33 .93 1.G4 .78 1.20 3.68 .80 1.16 .79 .41 .92 IJ 1.00 ].44 o o
o
o
o
o
o
-0
-0
IP2AVE
IP3AVE
USIAv t
1.44 1.31 .70 .45 .93 1.10 .76 ).22 3.72 .20 4.84 9.21 .93 3.36 .36 .50 2.12 .36
1.50 1.43 .71 .71 .91 1.0b .73 ).22 2.76 .10 6.6211.59 .41 4.76 .36 .50 1.68 .36
1. 56 1.43 .79 .82 .93 1.O~ .77 1.21 3.36 .30 3.67 5.71 .83 2.64 .36 leOO 1.20 .36
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
-0
-0
·0
..(:I, .•
· 6
· 5
· Ll
· 3
· 2
· 1
· 0
• 1
· .2
· 3
• Lj
· 5
• 6
RMRX RXl LERN ORE CRL.
MN FE MG T1 51 AL CA NA K
Z 636 1*i 650 1)2( 638 1Y 6L1Ll 1ill 602 1fa 61Ll 1I 630 1.ct 62Ll 1<!> 60Ll 1X 612 1
. + 616 1~ 620 1C9 6"16 1
~r--
...
· 6
· 5
· "1
u 3
D 2
u 1
u 0
u 1
· 2
· 3
• "1
· 5
· 6
RMRX RXl LERN ORE CRL.
MN FE MG TI S1 RL CR NR K
Z 608 1!Zfq 626 1){ 622 1Y 632 1rn 626 2
EB 618 1I 6"18 1~ 606 1<!> 610 1X 606 2+ 620 2~ 63"1 1C9 6Li2 1
,;,
· 6
· 5
• "1
· 3
· 2
1
· 0
1
· 2
D 3
" "1
· 5
· 6
RMRX AX2 0155. ORE CAL.
MN FE MG TI 51 RL CR NR K P
-----~-------------
Z 255 2~ 217 1ftC 2"11 5Y 213 2III 2Ll5 2
EB 2Ll1 1I 239 2~ 2"13 1<!> 237 3X 237 1+ 2"19 1~ 235 1C9 223 2
l
· 6
· 5
· ~
D 3
D 2
· 1
D 0
· 1
· 2
3
• L1
· 5
· 6
RMRX RX2 DISS. ORE CRL.
MN FE MG T1 51 RL CA NA K P
Z 235 2~ 251 1~ 227 2Y 253 3kQ 2"13 2
EB 227 1I 229 1~ 2L11 L1
<!> 2~9 3X 255 1+ 2~5 1~ 237 2C) 231 1
RMRX RX2 0155. ORE CRL.
· 6
· 5
• L1-L m Z 253 1
· 3-t /& ~ 221 1
· 2 i ~ 11[){ 209 2Y 211 1
· 1 ISJ2 rn 211 2
0-1- ~Z(JRfI \i \\fB 231 2I 233 1
· 1 1 '~!A' \T--li ,~~ 2L11 2
· 2-t ~ l( , <!> 239 1X 215 1
• 3-1- ,+ 257 1
• Lj t \ ~ 225 2C9 225 1
· 5.' 6
MN FE MG TI S1 RL CR NR K P
------.r--'
· 6
· 5
• Lj
· 3
· 2
· 1
· 01
· 2
· 3
• Lj
· 5
o 6
RMRX RX2 0155. ORE CRL.
MN FE MG TI 51 RL CA NR K p.
~ 227 3Y 2L11 3ill 253 2fa 219 1I 2L19 2~ 223 1<!> 215 2X 213 1+ 209 1A 2L17 2C9 2Ll7 1
.;
6
· 5
• Li
· 3
· 21
· 0
· 1
· 2
· 3
• Li
· 5
· 6
AMAX AX3 0155. ORE CAL.
MN FE MG T1 51 AL CA NR K P OH
Z 538 1*i 558 1ftC 58Ll 1Y 57 Ll 1tIl 556 1fB 58"1 2I 598 1~ 582 1<!> 5Li6 1X 576 1+ 578 1A 562 1C9 596 1
6
· 5
• L1
· 3
· 2
· 1
· 0
1
2
u 3
• L1
Q 5
Q 6
AMRX RX3 DISS. ORE CRL.
MN FE MG TI SI RL CR NR K P OH
Z 600 1*J 5L16 2)z( 580 1Y 572 1IlJ 5L18 1
EB 5L1LI 1
I 570 1~ 568 2~ 560 1X 532 1+ 5LIO 2A 55L1 1C) SLID 1
l
6
5
D L1
o 3
D 2
D 1
o1
D 2
. 3
L1
5
6
RMRX RX3 0155. ORE CRL.
MN FE MG T1 51 RL CR NR K P OH
Z 568 1~ 588 1)?{ 652 1Y 53L1 1(J) 552 1
EB 566 1I 550 1~ 590 1~ 56L1 1X 570 2+ 5L12 1A 536 2C) 536 1
.-.JITU
W0:o.
(J)(J)I--f
otv)xIT
Xcc2:0:
N .....-t
<.0 (0CO COU1 U)
Io
ITZ
ITU
-.JIT
Wl..L
Z::L
n N .....-t 0I I
U1 <.0
· 6
· 5
a Li
· 3
a 2
· 1
· 0
· 1
· 2
· 3
• Li
· 5
a 6
RMRX RX~ SEMIMRSS. ORE CAL.
MN FE MG T1 51 RL CR NR K P
~--....~\
Z 805 1*i 833 1)( 821 1Y 807 1rn 867 1IB 869 1I 8Li3 1~ 8Ll7 1<!> 855 1X 837 1
+ 863 16. 831 1C9 827 1
a 6
a 5
D Lj
D 3
2
a 1
a 0
a 1
a 2
a 3
• Lj
D 5
. 6
RMAX RX~ 5EMIMR55. ORE CRL.
MN FE MG TI 5I RL CA NA K P
z~
)z(~
y
illB3
I~
<!>X+AC9
859 1823 18L19 1819 1853 1851 1861 1801 1857 1835 1813 1829 1809 1
l
a 6
· 5
L1
u 3
· 2
a 1
a 0
a 1
· 2
· 3
• Lj
· 5
a 6
RMRX RXLJ 5EMIMR55. ORE CRL.
MN FE MG T1 S1 RL CR NR K P
fB 825 1I 817 1~ 811 1<!> 839-0X 803 1+ 8Ll 1 16 865 1C) 8LJ5 1
D 6
· 5
• L1
· 3
· 2
a 1
o1
a 2
· 3
• L1
· 5
· 6
RMRX RX5 0155. ORE CRL.
MN FE MG T1 51 RL CR NR K· P
Z 98Ll 1!*i 988 2 '~~ 1010 1Y 1018 2m 1016 1
EB 1008 1I 1002 1~ 996 1<!> 1GOLl 1X 99~ 1+ 988 1A iDOL! 2C9 990 2
l
RMRX AX5 DISS. ORE CRL.a 6
· 5
• ~...L JB Z 992 1
· 3-+- ..;x ~ ~ 1006 2
· 2t~~ ./1Jrf4~ 998 2Y 1010 2
· 1 rn 1012 1
· 0.1 ~~ \ k EB 986 1I 1006 1
· 1 1 / ~~~ \ ~ 998 1
2.+- \ \ ~ 1000 2X 986 2
· 3 1- \ A\ + 98"-1 2
· ~ t ~ / \\ A 1000 1Q) 1018 1
· 5
· 6
MN FE MG T1 SI RL CR NR K P
.I'
•-1a:uwc.co.
(f)(f)t--f
o1.DXa:Xa:2:a:
I I
+<J8
I I
0....
0:Z
ITU
t--f
I-
WLL
ZL
Lf) CO
DPl WRSTE ROCK CAL.
11 6
n 5
• <1 ~ y Z 36Ll 1
D 3 1- Iii\~ 29Ll 1
D 21 ~)2( 298 1y 368 1
1 -L ~ :'X: .4 \'t \\-- rn 30Ll 1
01 ~.~~~ ,\:fB 370 1I 296 2
1 -+- ~~/~ \ ~ 29~ 2
· ~1 '\£ \<!> 292 2X 366 1+ 368 2
• L1 1- \ A 292 1
· 5C9 292 3
· 6
MN FE MG TI SI RL CR NR K P
l
· 6
· 5
• L1
· 3
· 2
· 1
o
· 1
2
· 3
• L1
· 5
· 6
OPl WASTE ROCK CAL.
MN FE MG T1 5I RL CR NA K P
~ 296 1<!> 302 2X 296 3+ 300 1A 306 1Q) 302 1
a 6
a 5
"1
a 3
a 2
1
a 0
1
a 2
· 3
• "1
· 5
a 6
DP2 D1SS. ORE CRL.
MN FE MG T1 SI RL CR NR K
Z 310 1*i 332 2)z( 338 1Y 31"1 1ill 3Li6 1
EB 358 1I 33Li 1~ 32"1 1<!> 318 2X 35"1 1+ 3"1"1 1fJ. 336 1C9 350 1
_t_
OP2 0155. ORE CAL.
m 6
· 5a Lj-L Z 312 1
a 3 +- i *i 356 1ftC 362 2
· 2 1 !lIP y 3~O 1
• 1 i ~Jm 332 1
EB 33~ 2· 0 I 362 1
1 1 ~ 'I ..~ 308 1a
· 2.t ~ 316 1X 338 2
· 3 1 + 3Ll2 1
· '1 t ~ 328 2C9 360 1
a 5
u 6
MN FE MG TI 51 AL CA NA K
· 6
n 5
Li
3
· 21
oIt 1
It 2
· 3
• L1
· 5
· 6
OP2 0155. ORE CRL.
MN FE MG TI 51 AL CA NA K
IlJ 352 183 330 1I 350 2~ 360 2<!> 3Li8 1X 328 1+ 3Ll8 2~ 312 2C) 318 1
,,~
- ._- --...-.- ...........-~~ - -----~ - -- -- - -
M ....---l (D CD r-- "'f" ....---l (\J t""- U1 (\J U1 ('0
U1 "'f" ('0 U1 ...-f (\J lJ) ('0 Lf) ('0 ....---l U1 ....---l
U1 Lf) LD Lf) lJ) LD LD LD Lf) If) If) LD LD"'f" "'f" "'f" "'f" ~ "'f" "'f" "'f" "'f" "'f" "'f" 'r '-r
"-
[XJ~)s()- 8 m H f- 0X +-<1 E)
.-.Ja:uwa:o
a:z
ITU
WLL
Z2:
n (\J U1 CD
1P3 0155. ORE CRL.
a 6
D 5
LJ-l Z LJ53 1
3+ L ~ LJ5LJ 7
2.1 1m)( "153 Lj
Y "15"1 6
· 1 i~ f rn LJ52 5
D 0 ~ IB LJ5LJ Lj-~ I LJ51 LJ..........
II 1 1 \~ T .~ £152 2
· 2..J- x ~ <!> LJ5LJ 3X LJ55 2
. 3 1 + LJ53 3
• L1 t 6- LJ52 1C9 LJ52 65
. 6
MN FE MG T1 SI RL CR NR K
6
m 5
u Li
o 3
q 2
1
o1
2
· 3
• Li
5
· 6
IP3 DISS. ORE CAL.
MN FE MG T1 51 RL CR NR K
ill Li52 3fB L152 7I L15L1 24- L153 7<!> Lt51 1X ~5~ 5+ L151 66. L151 5
. Q) L155 L1
USl DISS. ORE CRL.B 6
· 5
· L1.l Z 27L1 1
· 3-t- ti ~ 272 L1ft( 272 3
· 2.1 " ./~ Y 272 2
· 1t~ '\ rn 272 1EB 270 2
· 0 I 270 11 1 2S. \~~_. ~ \ + 268 2
· 2 1- V\Y \ ~ 268 1X 266 3
31 \ .+ 266 2
· L1 + \ A 266 1C9 26Ll 1
• 5 I
I
· 6
MN FE MG T1 SI RL CR NR K P
/
U51 0155. ORE CAL.
· 6
5
a Li-L r Z 28Li 3
a 3 J- ~~ 28~ 2~ 28L1 1
a 2-L ... /h( il/Pit \. y 282 3
~1 ~/ \ ~rn 282 2fB 282 1I 280 L1
1 J_ ~~ ~,
~ 280 3
21 i1 ~\r/! I , ~ 280 2X 280 1
· 3 1 \ ~ I \ + 278 1
• Lj + \ / \ A 276 2
a 5 I
.... , C9 276 1
D 6
MN FE MG T1 51 AL CR NA K P
/
a 6
a 5
a L1
3
· 2
1
o1
· 2
a 3
a L1
a 5
· 6
U51 0155. ORE CAL.
MN FE MG T1 51 AL CA NA K P
m 290 3ffi 290 2I 290 1~ 288 3<!> 288 2X 288 1+ 286 2lJ. 286 1C) 28Ll Ll
g 235 2* 251 1fi( 227 2Y 253 3
ill 243 2fB 227 1I 229 1~ 241 4
<!> 249 3>< 255 1+ 245 1L\ 237 2(!) 231 1
AMAX AX2 DISS. ORE CAL.
MN FE MG TISI AL CA NA K p S CU NI FM CO CR OH CO
· 6
· 5
· 4
· 3
· 2
· 1
· 0
· 1.....,
• c::
· 3
· 4
· 5
· 6
RMRX RX2 DISS. ORE CRL.
6
m 5
m Lj..L 7JA ~ l.AJ l , Z 253 1m 3-!- IR ~\\ HI . , I ~
~ 221 1
2.l IfjJf~ //~~ \\ \I;~ \ / Iff W~ 1\1 ~ 1)2( 209 2
-k Y 211 1r
· 1 t~~\\¥jf~\\\- ~~~ ~\rn 211 2
m 0IB 231 2
- I 233 1all 7~Y
-m-.~~ l\ TI 1/1 \~,n fl//Jf \\\ \ AJI/ \ ~\ ~ 2Lil 2
m 2-t. ~ l{ , VIA \ \\\\1/i,V \\ \f jffl \~ \ \"'- <!> 239 1X 215 1
m 3 1 , 11\ \ \\\tl iI \\ IiI \ \\\ + 257 1
m Lj + 'V \\ X" \f \\~ A 225 2
. 5 I
,# .. " .. .. ... "" C9 225 1
6
MN FE MG T1 51 RL CR NR K P S CU N1 FM CO CR OH CO
6
D 5
D Ll
D 3
D 2
. 1
o1
· 2
· 3
D Lj
· 5
D 6
RMRX RX2 DIS5. ORE CAL.
MN FE MG T1 51 AL CA NA K P 5 CU NI FM CO CR OH CO
){ 227 3Y 2~1 3III 253 2
. EB 219 1I 2Ll9 2~ 223 1<!> 215 2X 213 1+ 209 1A 2~7 2C9 2~7 1
a 6
· 5
a Li
· 3
2
1
a 0
1
· 2
D 3
· Li
· 5
· 6
RMRX RX~ 5EMIMA55. ORE CAL.
. Z 805 1
~ 833 1)( 821 1Y 807 1(II 867 153 869 1I 8-43 1~ 8L\7 1<!> 855 1X 837 1+ 863 1~ 831 1C9 827 1
MN FE MG TI 51 AL CA NR K P 5 CU FM CR OH
l
6
D 5
D Ll
D 3
D 2
D 1
D 0
1
2
. 3
D L1
D 5
6
RMRX RXLl 5EMIMR55. ORE CRL.
Z 859 1~ 823 1){ 8Ll9 1
Y 819 1om 853 1. EB 851 1
I 861 1~. 801 1<!> 857 1X 835 1+ 813 1A 829 1C9 809 1
MN FE MG TI 51 RL CR NR K P 5 CU FM CR OH
..---l ..---l ..---l 0 ..---l ..---l ..---l ..---l
IU) ~ ..---l m C"1 ....---1 Lf) LDN ..---l ....---1 (¥) 0 ~ (D ~a:J a:J a:J a:J CD 0) CD (X)
I...
IB H ~OX+<JE)
:::r:a
a:u
(f)
CL
0:Z
0:U
WLL
Z2:
n ('J ..---l 0I I
Lf) (D
6
· 5
· Ll
· 3
· 2_1
I
1 '
o1
2
· 3
Q Li
Q 5
· 6
RMRX RX5 0155. ORE CRL.
MN FE MG T1 51 RL CR NR K P S CU N1 FM CO CR OH CO
Z 98Li 1~ 988 2)2{ 1010 1
. Y 1018 2rn 1016 1IE 1008 1I 1002 1~ 996 1<!> 1DOLl 1X 99Ll 1+ 988 1A 100Li 2C9 990 2
MN FE MG TI 51 RL CR NR K p 5 CU NI FM CO CR OH CO
RMRX RXS D15S6 t
• OAE CRL.
a 5
· -1
a 3
2
· 1 T ~~ Iii¥! hnl\l / It \ /1 g 992 1
o I A~~ ~ $~\ V I ff1tlH 1 1/ Mi \ I J * 1006 2X 998 2
1 I ~~~~-.- I \ \ \~-.-.J\\ m~ /I U\ \ <I< I _ I y 1010 2
2 I l!J ~~r...z 1 ~ I ~\ X\#T II i~UI IIm\i\\ / m~~ 1tl t m 1012 1EB 986 1
· 3 I \ I f.'flj f \i ~ f II.' ~ \g /11 ft§:7Jtt\ f\ I 1006 1· 1 I \ ,.., I III /\ la1J\II//\11 \ Jl1lK \ \ §:\ \ t ~ 998 1
· 5 I L _/ \ 1 II Al~J1VI ._ \\1 . II / \ \ Ull4:- ¢ 1000 2X 986 2
· 6 I ~ \If / I f X \\ \\\ /1/ \ \ \\\1 + 981 2A 1000 1(!) 1018 1
D 6
5
~
m 3
2
· 1
· 0
· 1
· 2r,
· j
· 4
5
· 6
RMRX RX5 0155. ORE CAL.
MN FE MG T1 51 RL CR NR K P S CU NI FM CO CR OH CO
+ lOlLJ 2A 990 1Q) 101"'1 1
i
OP2 0155. ORE CRL.a 6
5
a L1-L -f IJ...-K \\\\ \. j I 16 'dt; Z 310 1
· 3_~ ~ II~ \~ j~~A ~ 332 2
· 2 1 ?t\ "'- I//Ill \ \WI/ I \\XI \\\){ 338 1Y 31L1 1
~t ~AJIA~ MIlrm rn 3L16 1EB 358 1I 33L1 1
· 1 1 \\ WI I I I \ \\\~r ~ 32L1 1
· 2-+- f/ \ ?!7! \V X/ / I \ \ \. <'> 318 2X 35L1 1
a 3 1 X 1\ \ I A /1 \\ + 3L1L1 1
• <i t \ / \1 \f ~A 336 1C9 350 1
a 5
a 6
MN FE MG TI 51 RL CR NR K 5 CU N1 FM CR OH
DP2 0155. ORE CRL.
B 6
· 5
· Lj.l IJIII/,......"'. ~1\ \ \ / I fM¥,\ \ Z 312 1
· 3-t ~ ~\~ \7 Jf!(\\\ \ ~ 356 1ftC 362 2
· 2-l 1Di\ \~ f!( /h1 \~\ y 3~0 1
• 11~A, J\ \¥I ~m 332 1
· 0EB 33Ll 2
't.. A
I 362 1· 1 1 ~ ~'=.~~ \ \\ 1/ / \\~ ~ 308 1
· 2 1 \ \\ /I '/ ~ 1> 316 1X 338 2
· 3 1 \ ff/ + 3Ll2 1
· ~ t \/ A 328 2C9 360 1
· 5
· 6
MN FE MG T1 51 RL CR NR K S CU N1 FM CR OH
DP2 DISS. ORE CRL.
· 6
5
• Lj
3
· 2
· 1
· 0
u 1
u 2
m 3
• Lj
u 5
· 6
MN FE MG T1 51 RL CR NR K 5 CU NI FM CR OH
rn 352 1FE 330 1I 350 2~ 360 2<!> 3Ll8 1X 328 1+ 3"18 2A 312 2C9 318 1
IP2 DISS. ORE CALa
a 6
· 5
LI.L w II .A ~\\ m 'n( Z 52L1 1
• 3~_ lfJl7~11&\ A;;;A IA'\ ~ 520 1)2( 530 1
2.1- IJ/J!!Y< X\\ \ 'm I tJi1\\\ 1/1ft\\ y 528 1
· ~ t~ ~4~ A~\ Y/ IIA\ A& rn 518 1IE 519 1I 505 1
· 1 1 ~~~~y ! \\\ / / \,,~\\ IfA \\ \~ !fY\\\\ ~ ~ 523 1
· 2 1 ...~~ - -"" I \\Y \\ '~f I \\ \_~~\ \ <:> 50Ll 1"r: _ ~_,
X 506 1· 3 1
L::..~ fl ~ \ \\~ (\.. A ~ V I /\\Y£ + 502 1
a LI + \~/ \ 'I / ~\, / \ !/ \\ A 526 1
· 5 I
1 , '" ". , ." --- .. C) 507 1
· 6
MN FE MG TI SI RL CR NA K S CU NI FM CO CR OH CO
o 6
o 5
o 4
u 3
o 2
o 1
o 0
o 1
o 2
m 3
a 4
o 5
. 6
IP2 D1SS. ORE CRL.
MN FE MG TI 51 RL CR NR K 5 CU N1 FM CO CR OH CO
<!>X+AC9
511 1515 1
508 1 ..525 1512 1
1P2 0155. ORE CAL.
B 6
B 5
Lj -L / ;r I 1Ji1ID \ 'K Z 51 0 1
· 3 4- ~~\~\ /1\:\ l& ~ 527 1
2 i '.. \\R~~\ i~ fl( 521 1. . \r~\ ' ." Y 516 11 ~ T ~t l\" rn 522 1
o1- ~ ~~~ ~ m. Bi!J' \\'/ \ \ \\ //II~~~\\' I ,/ /f.IU \\, ~ fB 51 ~ 1I 513 1
· 1 1 ~~ ._.~ \ \t~~l //fl-I-\\\\\~ / ffl1Y4 \\\\\~ -t- ' 509 1
· 2 -+- ·W~\ Ii 1 \\WAI \\\\~.fA kl~\\ \_ <!> 500 1X 503 1
D 3 1- l"irJ!}1 \ W/I \ \\\\ AI fA L \~\ + 50 1 1
D Lj 1- \~iJ \ /,. I \ ~t 1/ \ I \/,\\ \\ ~ 51 7 1• 5 l,ffi .. f \( ~ I \ , 1-..... "".. C9 529 1
· 6
MN FE MG TI 51 RL CR NR K 5 CU NI FM CO CR OH CO
·:t· 3
D 2
• 1_
o
• 1_,
2
· 3 tLj -
5
· 61
IP3 DISS. ORE CRL.
MN FE MG TI SI RL CR NR K S CU NI FM CO CR OH CO
Z LJ55 3~ LJ5LJ 1ftC LJ53 6Y LJ55 6rn LJ51 7
ffi LJ52 Lj
I LJ55 1-+ LJ53 2<!> LJ55 7X LJ53 5+ LJ51 2A LJ55 5C9 LJ51 3
1P3 DISS. ORE CRL.
a 6
· 5
·:1 z Ll53 1
£ ~ LJ5Ll 7fl( Lj53 LJ
· 2 J- ~ \\\\ IflJJA y LJ5LJ 6
all ~~ v1T \\~\ ,~III ~\ \\\ ¥ IIJ ~d\\~ rn LJ52 5EB LJ5LJ Lj
01 ar ~~ fAt \\\\~ lUll ~\ \~ I~ 1/ ( ~h \ I LJ51 Lj.~
· 1 + \:~/ W \~~ Klh \\\~~"'l 'T -4- LJ52 2
21 X ~
\\\ 11111 \\ \Af/\k/\<!> Lj5LJ 3X Lj55 2
· 31 \ffI \ $1 ~ \ \X\ + LJ53 3a ~ J_ \/ \f / \~~
b,. LJ52 1
~!C) LJ52 6
MN FE MG T1 SI RL CR NR K S CU NI FM CO CR OH CO
6
· 5 ~
a L1
3
· 2
1
· 0
1
· 2rz· '-"--
• Lj
· 5
· 6
IP3 DISS. ORE CRLa
MN FE MG TI 51 RL CR NR K 5 CU NI FM CO CR OH CO
rn Li52 3B3 452 7I Li5Li 2+ L153 7<!> L151 1X L15L1 5+ L151 6A Li51 5C) L155 L1