FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel
Transcript of FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel
FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel
Christine C. Ginocchio, PhD, MT (ASCP) VP, Scientific and Medical Affairs, BioFire Diagnostics
VP, Global Microbiology, bioMerieux
Professor of Medicine, Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, NY
2
Delayed Treatment: Increased
Morbidity and Mortality
The causative agents of meningitis or encephalitis should be rapidly identified to guide
appropriate patient management, but are many times impossible to identify based on
clinical indications alone due to overlapping symptoms1,2
Delays in appropriate therapy can be associated with adverse outcomes1
Early diagnosis facilitates timely and appropriate therapeutic interventions and
can minimize the risks of adverse outcomes and mortality2
Viral
Brain damage, including
behavioral and personality
changes and memory and
speech problems
Focal neurological signs
Seizures
Bacterial
Permanent brain and nerve
damage
Behavioral changes
Cognitive disabilities
Lack of muscle control
Seizures
Fungal
Increased intracranial
pressure
Hydrocephalus
IRIS
Blindness, sometimes with
optic atrophy
3
Traditional Diagnostics
CSF
Examination5
Cell count
Protein
Glucose
CSF
Culture5,6
Pathogen-specific
media
Bacterial culture
Viral culture
Fungal culture
Rapid Latex
Agglutination Test8
India
Ink Stain5 Gram Stain7
CSF=cerebrospinal fluid; PCR=polymerase chain reaction. 1. Bamberger DM. Am Fam Physician. 2010;82:1491-1498. 2. Tunkel AR et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47:303-327. 3. NINDS. Meningitis and Encephalitis Fact Sheet. www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/encephalitis_meningitis/detail_encephalitis_ meningitis.htm. Updated November 24, 2014. Accessed January 6, 2015. 4. College of American Pathologists. Microbiology Checklist. April 21, 2014. 5. Bahr NC et al. Biomark Med. 2014;9:1085-1103. 6. Markoulatos P et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:4426-4432. 7. Kumal S. Textbook of Microbiology. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. First Edition. 2012. 8. Duval BD et al. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;90:1043-1046.
Traditional
PCR5 Crystal
violet
Iodine
Alcohol
Safranin
Positive Negative
<1 hr 72 hr-14 d <1 hr < 1 hr 2-4 hr 1-24 hr
2-5 d
4
Challenges in Diagnosing Meningitis
and Encephalitis Infections Meningitis and encephalitis often present with similar symptoms, sometimes as
flu-like symptoms1
The causative agents underlying the disease may not be distinguishable based
on clinical symptoms alone2
Challenges associated with currently available testing methods1,3:
Time-consuming
Technically
complex/requires
specific expertise
Lack sensitivity and
specificity
Small volume of CSF
obtained
Physician must choose
which tests to select
based on symptoms and
available CSF volume
Need to order multiple
tests specific for
suspected organisms Accuracy may be
affected by antibiotic
administration
CSF=cerebrospinal fluid. 1. NINDS. Meningitis and Encephalitis Fact Sheet. www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/encephalitis_meningitis/detail_
encephalitis_meningitis.htm. Updated November 24, 2014. Accessed January 6, 2015. 2. Bamberger DM. Am Fam Physician. 2010;82:1491-1498. 3. Bahr NC et al. Biomark Med. 2014;9:1085-1103.
5
Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel
Bacteria
Escherichia coli K1
Haemophilus influenzae
Listeria monocytogenes
Neisseria meningitidis
Streptococcus agalactiae
Streptococcus pneumoniae
Fungi
Cryptococcus neoformans/gattii
Viruses
Cytomegalovirus (CMV)
Enterovirus
Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1)
Herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2)
Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6)
Human parechovirus
Varicella zoster virus (VZV)
6
E. coli
GBS
L. monocytogenes
H. influenzae
HSV-1, 2
EV, PeV
S. pneumoniae
N. meningitidis
H. influenzae (NT)
EV, PeV
HHV-6
EBV, CMV
Arboviruses
N. meningitidis
S. pneumoniae
H. influenzae (NT)
EV, PeV
HSV-1, 2
EBV, CMV
Arboviruses
S. pneumoniae
N. meningitidis
H. influenzae (NT)
Gram neg (K. kingae)
HSV-1, 2, VZV (zoster)
EV
Arboviruses
Neuroborelliosis
All above +
L. monocytogenes
CMV, EBV
HIV
HHV-6
Polyomaviruses (BK)
Aspergillosis
Nocardiosis
Cryptococcosis
Toxoplasmosis
Neurosyphillis
Gram negatives
Gram positives
+++++++++
Comprehensive Diagnostics for the
Most Common Pathogens
7
BioFire FilmArray® System
8
BioFire FilmArray® Pouch
Sample extraction and
purification
1st stage multiplex
PCR
2nd stage PCR
9
8. The FilmArray performs a melt to confirm the presence or
absence of assay-specific temperature signatures of the second
stage PCR product for each well in the array
2. Nucleic acids bound by magnetic beads move from the lysis
chamber to the purification chamber. A wash buffer removes
cellular and pathogen debris
3. An elution buffer removes purified nucleic acids from the
magnetic beads
4. Nucleic acids move to the first-stage PCR chamber. Reverse
transcriptase converts target RNA to DNA, followed by a high-order
multiplex PCR
5. Products from the first-stage PCR are diluted to remove any
remaining PCR primers
6. First-stage PCR products are added to fresh master mix and are
aliquoted into each well of the array
7. Each well is pre-spotted with a single pair of second-stage PCR
primers, resulting in specific amplification of target DNA only. A
fluorescent double-stranded DNA binding dye monitors each reaction
1. Sample moves into lysis chamber. Cells and pathogens are lysed
by bead beating, releasing nucleic acids
65:00
65 minutes
run-time
64:00 63:00 62:00 61:00 60:00 59:00 58:00 57:00 56:00 55:00 54:00 53:00 52:00 51:00 50:00 49:00 48:00 47:00 46:00 45:00 44:00 43:00 42:00 41:00 40:00 39:00 38:00 37:00 36:00 35:00 34:00 33:00 32:00 31:00 30:00 29:00 28:00 27:00 26:00 25:00 24:00 23:00 22:00 21:00 20:00 19:00 18:00 17:00 16:00 15:00 14:00 13:00 12:00 11:00 10:00 09:00 08:00 07:00 06:00 05:00 04:00 03:00 02:00 01:00 00:00 65:00
Sample Extraction, Amplification,
and Detection: All Inclusive
15-0159-00/MK
10
Automated Results Analysis
102 individual 2nd stage PCR wells
Each well contains one reaction
2/3 wells must be positive
Melt curves generated for each well: must be within specific ranges
Process Control Freeze-dried Schizosaccharomyces pombe organism
Re-suspended with specimen
•PCR II Control
DNA template spotted on the array
FilmArray® Results Qualification
Staphylococcus aureus
15-0159-00/MK
11
Intended Use
Qualitative test for bacteria, viruses and
yeast
CSF (200 ml) obtained via lumbar
puncture from individuals with signs
and/or symptoms of meningitis and/or
encephalitis.
Not centrifuged, xanthrochromic and
bloody acceptable
Not intended for testing of specimens
collected from indwelling CNS medical
devices (shunts)
“Aid in diagnosis” – must be used with
other clinical, lab and epidemiological
data
Culture is necessary for organism
recovery, typing, and antimicrobial
susceptibility testing of bacterial agents
FilmArray and FilmArray
2.0 Systems
12
Performance Studies
Analytical Validation
Limit of Detection (LoD)
Reactivity
Precision/Reproducibility
Clinical Validation
Prospective clinical trial
Archived specimen testing
Contrived specimen testing
13
ANALYTICAL STUDIES
14
LoD is 100 – 1,000 CFU/mL or cells/mL for all bacteria & yeast
ME Panel Test Result Species/Isolate Tested
LoD
Concentration BACTERIA
E. coli K1 E. coli K1, O18ac:K1:H7
1×103 CFU/mL ATCC 700973
H. influenzae H. influenzae, type b, biotype I
1×103 CFU/mL ATCC 10211
L. monocytogenes L. monocytogenes, type 4b
1×103 CFU/mL ATCC 13932
N. meningitidis N. meningitidis, type W135
100 CFU/mL ATCC 43744
S. agalactiae S. agalactiae, group B
1×103 CFU/mL ATCC 13813
S. pneumoniae S. pneumoniae, serotype 1 100 cells/mL*
YEAST
C. neoformans/gattii
C. neoformans
ATCC 20882 100 CFU/mL
C. gattii
ATCC MYA-4877 100 CFU/mL
*cells/mL is based on OD600 reading – no CFU/mL determined
Limit of Detection (LoD)
95% Detection Level
15
Limit of Detection (LoD)
95% Detection Level
ME Panel Test Result Species/Isolate Tested LoD Concentration
viruses
CMV CMV, strain AD-169 100 TCID50/mL
Zeptometrix 0810003CF (4.30×103 copies/mL)
EV
(Species A-D)
Coxsackievirus A6, species A, strain Gdula 50 TCID50/mL
ATCC VR-1801
Coxsackievirus A9, species B 5 TCID50/mL
Zeptometrix 0810017CF
Coxsackievirus A17, species C, strain G-12 5 TCID50/mL
ATCC VR-1023
EV 70, species D, strain J670/71 50 TCID50/mL
ATCC VR-836
HSV-1 HSV-1, strain MacIntyre 250 TCID50/mL
Zeptometrix 0810005CF (1.51×103 copies/mL)
HSV-2 HSV-2, strain MS 50 TCID50/mL
Zeptometrix 0810006CF (1.29×103 copies/mL)
HHV-6 HHV-6A, strain U1102, NCPV 0003121v
1×104 copies/mL HHV-6B, strain HST, NCPV 0006111v
HPeV HPeV, type 3
500 TCID50/mL Zeptometrix 0810147CF
VZV VZV, strain Ellen 0.10 TCID50/mL
Zeptometrix 0810171CF (1.66×103 copies/mL)
LoD is 5-500 TCID50/mL or 100 – 1,000 copies/mL for all viruses
16
Summary of ME Analytical Reactivity
(Inclusivity)
FilmArray ME
Panel
Test Result
# Tested and
Detected
Concentration
Detected Isolates Tested and Detected
Bacteria
E. coli K1 5 ≤ 3,000 CFU/mL E. coli strains of the K1 serotype only
H. influenzae 9 ≤ 3,000 CFU/mL Non-typeable and typeable (types a-f) strains of H. influenzae
L. monocytogenes 6 ≤ 3,000 CFU/mL Types 1/2a, 1/2b, and 4b of L. monocytogenesa
N. meningitidis 7 ≤ 300 CFU/mL Encapsulated N. meningitis (serotypes W135, A, B, C, D, Y and
DNA from a strains with a variant ctrA gene)
S. agalactiae 5 ≤ 3,000 CFU/mL Multiple serotypes or isolates of S. agalactiae (Group B
Streptococcus)
S. pneumoniae 6 ≤ 300 cells/mL Multiple serotypes of S. pneumoniae
Viruses
CMV 5 ≤ 300 TCID50/mL
(≤ 1×104 copies/mL) Multiple strains of Cytomegalovirus (CMV).
EV 18 ≤ 50 TCID50/mL Representative isolates from all species (A-D) and several
serotypes of human Enterovirus, Coxsackievirus, and Echovirusb
HSV-1 5 ≤ 750 TCID50/mL
(≤ 4.5×103 copies/mL) Multiple strains of Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1)
HSV-2 5 ≤ 150 TCID50/mL
(≤ 4×103 copies/mL) Multiple strains of Herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2)
HHV-6 4 ≤ 3×104 copies/mL A and B variants of Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6)
HPeV 6 500 - 5,000 TCID50/mL Serotypes 1-6 of Human parechovirus (HPeV)c
VZV 5 ≤ 0.3 TCID50/mL
(≤ 5×103 copies/mL) Multiple strains of Varicella zoster virus (VZV)
Yeast
C. neoformans/gattii 10
(5 per species) ≤ 300 CFU/mL
Multiple strains, serotypes, and genotypes of Cryptococcus
neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii
17
Analytical Specificity
(Exclusivity/Cross-Reactivity)
>100 off-panel isolates tested at high concentration Minor cross-reactivity identified:
Enterovirus (EV2) assay will cross-react with various rhinoviruses
H. influenzae assay (H. influenzae 1) will cross-react with H. haemolyticus
C. neoformans/gattii assay will cross-react with C. amylolentus
Rhinovirus and H. haemolyticus are rarely isolated from CSF – but can be in respiratory tract – avoid sample contamination
C. amylolentus is not isolated from humans
18
Precision/Reproducibility –
Study Design
Every analyte tested @ 3 levels
Moderate Positive (3× LoD)
- Expect positive results in >95% of samples
Low Positive (1× LoD)
- Expect positive results in ≥95% of samples
Negative
- Expect negative results in all samples
Testing occurs:
At 3 test sites
Multiple runs per day, on multiple (5) days
On multiple instruments/ 2.0 systems
By multiple operators (2 per day per site)
With multiple pouch/reagent lots
19
Precision/Reproducibility
Results
Expected qualitative results (Detected/Not Detected) reported at all sites, with all instruments/systems, etc.
Test Result
(Organism/Isol
ate Tested)
Concentratio
n Tested
Expecte
d Result
Agreement with Expected Result
FilmArray FilmArray 2.0
Site A Site B Site C
All Sites
(95%
Confidence
Interval)
System A System B System
C
All Systems
(95%
Confidence
Interval)
BACTERIA
E. coli K1
(ATCC 700973)
Moderate
Positive
3× LoD
3×103
CFU/mL
Detected 30/30
100%
30/30
100%
30/30
100%
90/90
100%
(96.0%-
100%)
30/30
100%
30/30
100%
30/30
100%
90/90
100%
(96.0%-100%)
Low Positive
1× LoD
1×103
CFU/mL
Detected 30/30
100%
30/30
100%
30/30
100%
90/90
100%
(96.0%-
100%)
29/30
96.7%
29/30
96.7%
29/30
96.7%
87/90
96.7%
(90.6%-99.3%)
Negative
(No analyte)
Not
Detected
60/60
100%
60/60
100%
60/60
100%
180/180
100%
(98.0%-
100%)
60/60
100%
60/60
100%
60/60
100%
180/180
100%
(98.0%-100%)
20
CLINICAL PERFORMANCE PROSPECTIVE, ARCHIVED, CONTRIVED TESTING
21
Prospective Study
Overview
In hospital laboratories
Prospectively-collected patient specimens
Residual specimens leftover from clinician order
for CSF bacterial culture
At least 1500 tests to show performance in
intended use setting
22
Comparator Methods
CSF Bacterial Culture Escherichia coli K1
Haemophilus influenza
Listeria monocytogenes
Neisseria meningitidis
Streptococcus agalactiae
Streptococcus pneumoniae
PCR & Sequencing* Cytomegalovirus
Epstein-Barr virus
Herpes simplex virus1
Herpes simplex virus 2
Human herpesvirus 6
Varciella zoster virus
Human parechovirus
Human enterovirus
Cryptococcus neoformans/gattii
* 2 PCR assays + sequencing
23
Data Collection
Basic Demographics
Age range (<2 mo, 2 – 23 mo, 2 – 17 yrs, 18 – 34 yrs, 35 – 64
yrs, >65 yrs)
Sex
Status (ED, inpatient, outpatient)
Results of bacterial culture
Results of any other CSF testing ordered
CSF chemistry (protein, glucose, WBC + differential)
For positives:
Abx issued within 24 hrs prior to LP
Immune status
Clinician final diagnosis
24
Enrollment Summary
1560 prospectively-collected, residual specimens
Of which 545 (35%) had
been previously frozen*
Feb – Sept 2014
11 U.S. Study Sites
All age groups included
(41% under 18)
Mostly hospitalized (59%) or ED (34%)
*IUO pouches available June 2014
25
System Performance
98.9% of specimens were successfully
tested on the initial test
11 instrument / software errors (~0.7%)
6 pouch control failures (~0.4%)
26
19.40%
11.90% 7.60% 6.70%
4.40% 4.60%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
< 2 mo.(n=299)
2-23 mo.(n=143)
2-17 years(n=197)
18-34 years(n=224)
35-64 years(n=522)
65+ years(n=175)
Overall Positivity = 8.7%
Positivity by Age Group
27
Prevalence by FilmArray
February to September 2014 - United States
FilmArray ME Panel
Result
Overall
(n=1560)
< 2 mo.
(n=299)
2-23 mo.
(n=143)
2-17 years
(n=197)
18-34 years
(n=224)
35-64 years
(n=522)
65+ years
(n=175)
Bacteria
E. coli K1 3 (0.2%) 0 (0%) 1 (0.7%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (0.4%) 0 (0%)
H. influenzae 2 (0.1%) 0 (0%) 1 (0.7%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (0.2%) 0 (0%)
L. monocytogenes 0 (0.0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
N. meningitidis 0 (0.0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
S. agalactiae 1 (0.1%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (0.6%)
S. pneumoniae 16 (1.0%) 2 (0.7%) 2 (1.4%) 2 (1%) 3 (1.3%) 4 (0.8%) 3 (1.7%)
Viruses
CMV 6 (0.4%) 4 (1.3%) 0 (0%) 1 (0.5%) 1 (0.4%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
EV 51 (3.3%) 31 (10.4%) 5 (3.5%) 11 (5.6%) 4 (1.8%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
HSV-1 4 (0.3%) 0 (0%) 2 (1.4%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (0.4%) 0 (0%)
HSV-2 12 (0.8%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (0.4%) 8 (1.5%) 3 (1.7%)
HHV-6 22 (1.4%) 9 (3%) 7 (4.9%) 2 (1%) 3 (1.3%) 1 (0.2%) 0 (0%)
HPeV 12 (0.8%) 12 (4%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
VZV 7 (0.4%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (1.3%) 3 (0.6%) 1 (0.6%)
Yeast
C. neoformans/gattii 5 (0.3%) 1 (0.3%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (0.4%) 2 (0.4%) 1 (0.6%)
28
Analyte Sensitivity Specificity
TP/(TP + FN) % 95%CI TN/(TN + FP) % 95%CI
Bacteria
E. coli K1 2/2 100 34.2-100 1557/1558 99.9 99.6-100
H. influenzae 1/1 100 - 1558/1559 99.9 99.6-100
L. monocytogenes 0/0 - - 1560/1560 100 99.8-100
N. meningitidis 0/0 - - 1560/1560 100 99.8-100
S. agalactiae 0/1 0.0 - 1558/1559 99.9 99.6-100
S. pneumoniae 4/4 100 51.0-100 1544/1556 99.2 98.7-99.6
Analyte Positive Percent Agreement Negative Percent Agreement
TP/(TP + FN) % 95%CI TN/(TN + FP) % 95%CI
Viruses
CMV 3/3 100 43.9-100 1554/1557 99.8 99.4-99.9
EV 44/46 95.7 85.5-98.8 1507/1514 99.5 99.0-99.8
HSV-1 2/2 100 34.2-100 1556/1558 99.9 99.5-100
HSV-2 10/10 100 72.2-100 1548/1550 99.9 99.5-100
HHV-6 18/21 85.7 65.4-95.0 1532/1536 99.7 99.3-99.9
HPeV 9/9 100 70.1-100 1548/1551 99.8 99.4-99.9
VZV 4/4 100 51.0-100 1553/1556 99.8 99.4-99.9
Yeast
C. neoformans/gattii 1/1 100 - 1555/1559 99.7 99.3-99.9
Summary of Prospective Data
29
Concern for False Positives
Laboratory Precautions
Due to the sensitive nature of the FilmArray ME Panel, it is
important to guard against contamination.
Limitations in Product Literature S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae can be shed from the
respiratory tract of healthy individuals.
HSV-1 may also be shed from individuals with active or recurrent
cold sores.
Particular attention should be given to the Laboratory
Precautions noted under the Warnings and Precautions section.
Caution should also be exercised during specimen collection and
testing to prevent contamination leading to false positive results.
Results from this test must be correlated with the clinical history,
epidemiological data, and other data available to the clinician
evaluating the patient.
30
Cryptococcal Antigen Test
PCR negative/CrAg positive
Low level CrAg titers may persist for extended periods of
time following appropriate therapy and the resolution of
infection
- May be indicative of cryptococcal immune reconstitution
inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) with history of cryptococcal
meningitis and sterile cultures
Medical chart review indicated that each subject with
positive CrAg and negative FilmArray was on antifungal
therapy for treatment of cryptococcal meningitis or
cryptococcosis at the time of specimen collection and/or
had prior history of Cryptococcus infection.
- likely due to antigen persistence rather than the presence of live
organism
31
Co-Detections
Distinct Co-Detection Combinations
Analyte 1 Analyte 2
CMV S. pneumoniae
EV HPeV
HSV-1 HHV-6
HSV-2 S. agalactiae
VZV S. pneumoniae
136 Positive Specimens
141 Positive Results
5 dual detections
Recommend retesting
specimens showing
multiple detections, to
rule out potential
contamination
32
Considerations for
Herpesvirus Detections
HHV-6 or CMV can exist in latent form that is reactivated during infection due to other pathogens, including agents not detected by the FilmArray ME panel that may cause meningitis/encephalitis (e.g., Mycobacterium tuberculosis or HIV).
When detected by the FilmArray ME, HHV-6 or CMV should be considered as the likely cause of meningitis/encephalitis only in appropriate clinical settings and following expert consultation
Viral shedding into the CSF often occurs in cases of zoster (shingles; caused by reactivation of VZV). VZV may not be the cause of CNS disease in some cases.
33
Archived Study
Purpose:
Supplement prospective
study by testing known
positive sepcimens
Workflow:
Lab ID is confirmed by
molecular assay
Data Analysis:
Only confirmed
specimens are
considered for
performance
Analyte Received Confirmed (%)
E. coli K1 7 2 (29%) Haemophilus influenzae 3 3 (100%)
Listeria monocytogenes 1 1 (100%)
Neisseria meningitidis 8 7 (88%)
Streptococcus agalactiae 2 2 (100%)
Streptococcus pneumoniae 21 17 (81%)
CMV 11 8 (73%)
HSV-1 17 10 (59%)
HSV-2 26 18 (69%)
ARUP “HSV positive” 35 22 (63%)
HHV-6 22 16 (73%)
HPeV 6 3 (50%)
VZV 29 22 (76%)
Cryptococcus neoformans/gattii
22 19 (86%)
Total 210 150 (71%)
Previous Panel Archived Confirmation:
RP 86% confirmed and GI 85% confirmed
34
Archived Performance
Analyte Positive Percent Agreement Negative Percent Agreement
TP/(TP + FN) % 95% CI TN/(TN + FP) % 95% CI
Bacteria
E. coli K1 2/2 100 34.2-100 35/35 100 90.1-100
H. influenzae 3/3 100 43.9-100 39/39 100 91.0-100
L. monocytogenes 1/1 100 - 41/41 100 91.4-100
N. meningitidis 7/7 100 64.6-100 34/34 100 89.8-100
S. agalactiae 2/2 100 34.2-100 40/40 100 91.2-100
S. pneumoniae 17/17 100 81.6-100 21/21 100 84.5-100
Viruses
CMV 7/8 87.5 52.9-97.8 181/181 100 97.9-100
HSV-1 16/16 100 80.6-100 156/157 99.4 96.5-99.9
HSV-2 33/34 97.1 85.1-99.5 136/136 100 97.3-100
HHV-6 12/16 75.0 50.5-89.8 168/168 100 97.8-100
HPeV 2/3 66.7 20.8-93.9 187/187 100 98.0-100
VZV 22/22 100 85.1-100 162/164 98.8 95.7-99.7
Yeast
C. neoformans/gattii 19/19 100 83.2-100 171/171 100 97.8-100
35
Contrived Study
Residual CSF specimens negative for all ME
panel analytes (by FilmArray and comparator
methods) were co-spiked
235 Specimens - 35 Negative
- 50 specimens per analyte with at least six quantified isolates
evaluated - 25 at 2 × LoD
- 25 at four concentrations spanning the clinically relevant range (based on Cp values from
previous FilmArray ME Panel positive test results)
Specimens tested at six of the prospective study
clinical laboratories
36
Contrived Performance
a One E coli false negative was observed at 2 × LoD and one E coli false negative was observed at 0.2 × LoD. b Both S. agalactiae false negatives were observed at 0.2 × LoD. c Both CMV false negatives were observed at 0.2 × LoD.
Analyte
/PPA NPA
TP/(TP +
FN) % 95% CI TN/(TN + FP) % 95% CI
E. coli K1 47/49a 95.9 86.3-98.9 245/245 100 98.5-100
H. influenzae 50/50 100 92.9-100 243/244 99.5 97.7-99.9
L. monocytogenes 50/50 100 92.9-100 244/244 100 98.5-100
N. meningitidis 75/75 100 95.1-100 219/219 100 98.3-100
S. agalactiae 48/50b 96.0 86.5-98.9 244/244 100 98.5-100
CMV 47/49c 95.9 86.3-98.9 245/245 100 98.5-100
HHV-6 50/50 100 92.9-100 243/244 99.5 97.7-99.9
HPeV 50/50 100 92.9-100 244/244 100 98.5-100
37
Summary of Registration
Studies
FilmArray ME Panel is:
Sensitive
- LoD in 100 – 1,000 copies/mL
- Clinical study showed 95-100% PPA for most analytes
Specific
- Limited cross-reactivity
- Clinical study showed >99% NPA for all analytes
Reliable
- Highly reproducible test results
- Robust
- Few errors/control failures in intended use setting