Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

download Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

of 52

Transcript of Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    1/52

    IntroductIon

    EBoS

    concEptual

    FramEwork

    FundInG

    StructurE

    oF EBo actIvItIES

    EBo tarGEt

    GroupS

    and prIorItIES

    advocacy

    womEn youthEthnIc

    mInorItIES

    rElIGIouS

    mInorItIES

    kEy achIEvEmEntS

    and challEnGES

    StratEGIc

    analySES, polIcy

    BrIEFInGS

    and nEwS

    Support

    For polItIcal

    conSultatIonS to

    rESolvE conFlIctS

    Support to dEvElop

    common StratEGIES

    and prIorItIES

    Support to EnaBlE

    thE plannInG

    oF proGrammES

    Support For

    IntErnShIpS and

    capacIty-BuIldInG

    proGrammES

    Support For mEdIa

    and InFormatIon

    projEctS

    BackGround

    oF thE nrp

    mandatE

    oF thE nrp

    vISIon

    oF thE nrp

    GoalS

    oF thE nrp

    typE and naturE

    oF nrp actIvItIES

    how doES

    thE nrp work

    thE nrp oFFIcEnrp proGrammE

    commIttEEconcluSIon

    orGanISatIonS

    FundEd

    By EBo/nrp

    FInancIal

    rEport

    rEport on ovEr a dEcadE oF actIvItIES

    Euro-Burma OfficeWorking to promote democracy in Burma

    03 131104 05

    171614 1915

    2120

    25 353127 28

    393837 4037

    4341 4440 46

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    2/52

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    3/52

    02 About us

    10 Targets and priorities

    18 Key achievements and challenges

    34 The National Reconciliation Programme

    42 Conclusion

    rEport on ovEr a dEcadE oF actIvItIES

    Euro-Burma OfficeWorking to promote democracy in Burma

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    4/52

    2 Euro-Burma Oce | Activity ReportAbout us

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    5/52

    Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report 3

    IntroductionEuro-Burma Ofce (EBO) in Brussels is the

    operations centre o the Associates to DevelopDemocratic Burma Inc (ADDB), a Canadian

    not-or-prot corporation.

    EBO was established in 1997 with support rom

    the European Parliament, the European Com-

    mission, the Friedrich-Ebert-Stitung (FES),

    and the Burmese democracy movement.

    The aims of EBO are to:

    Help the Burmese democracy movementprepare or a transition to democracy, and

    Keep the international community

    inormed about Burma.

    EBO has been unded by the Swedish

    International Development Agency

    (Sida) directly, and through the Olo

    Palme International Center, the Danish

    International Development Agency (Danida)

    through the Danish Burma Committee, the

    European Commission, Canadian Internation-

    al Development Agency (CIDA) through Ca-

    nadian Lutheran World Relie, the Norwegian

    Ministry o Foreign Aairs, Trocaire

    (Ireland), FriedrichEbertStitung, the

    Norwegian Burma Council, the Institute orPublic Administration (Irela nd), Evangelische

    Missionswerks, the Dag Hammarskjold Foun-

    dation, the National Endowment or Democ-

    racy (USA), People in Need (Czech Republic)

    and the National Coalition Government o the

    Union o Burma ( NCGUB).

    The Associates to Develop Democratic

    Burma Inc was ounded in 1990 and incorpo-

    rated in 1994 in Canada.

    The objectives of the ADDB are to:

    a

    Restore democracy and respector human rights in Burma.

    b Encourage and enable all in Burmato participate in the democratic process.

    c Facilitate the development o democraticvalues and traditions in Burma.

    d Monitor and continue to promotedemocracy in Burma in thepost-dictatorship era.

    e Help uture governments and the Burmesepublic consider, analyze and ormulatesocial, economic and other policies criticalto a democracy.

    The ADDB was initiall y unded by membership

    ees and the Canadian International Centre orHuman Rights and Democratic Development

    (nowRights & Democracy).

    Activities of the EBO over

    the past 13 years have included:

    a Strategic analyses, policy briengs andrecommendations, and news updates;

    b Support or intra- and inter-ethnicpolitical consultations to resolve conficts(principally through the NationalReconciliation Programme - NRP);

    c Support or broad-based political

    inrastructures to developcommon strategies and priorities(principally through the NRP);

    d Support or a primary database to enablethe planning o a comprehensive humanresources development programme;

    e Support or internships andcapacity building programmes;

    f Support or media and inormation projects.

    Priority target groups

    of the EBO have included:

    Political parties, political activists

    and organizations;Civil society and community-basedorganizations;

    The international community especially theUnited Nations and relevant governments.

    Within each o the groups identied, the EBO

    has paid special attention to disenranchised

    communities, in particular, women, youth,

    ethnic minorities and religious minorities.

    Domestic (within the Burmese community)

    and international advocacy components are

    integrated into all areas o EBO's activities.

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    6/52

    4 Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report

    EBO works on the basis that development (poverty eradication),

    human rights and security (peace) are all intertw ined and interde-pendent. One cannot be achieved without the other.

    ConceptualFramework

    This statement by Ko Annan refects

    the growing consensus that human

    rights and poverty eradication are

    inetricably linked. In the past, human

    rights and development cooperation tended

    to be approached by dierent actors through

    dierent strategies and policies. NGOs

    themselves traditionally split into two di-

    erent categories - those promoting human

    rights (most o them ocusing on individual

    civil rights and democratisation) and those

    involved in development cooperation work.

    Since the collapse o the bi-polar world at

    the end o twentieth century these two areas

    o work have increasingly begun to overlap,acknowledging that human rights, individual

    as well as collective (political & civil, as well

    as social, cultural and economic rights), are

    at the heart o democratic transormation, as

    well as poverty eradication.

    A rights-based approach creates a ramework

    or a more inclusive, participatory way o

    doing development, and highlighting the

    aBout uS

    Kofi AnnanIn larger reedom:

    towards development,

    security and human

    rights or all

    Secretary-General

    UN, 2005

    The world must advance the causes o security,development and human rights together, otherwisenone will succeed. Humanity will not enjoy securitywithout development, it will not enjoy developmentwithout security, and it will not enjoy either withoutrespect or human rights.

    accountability o governments and other

    development actors to ull obligations and

    responsibilities towards their citizens accord-

    ing to international commitments 1.

    EBO is deeply aware o the benets o this

    approach and although the ocus o its work is on

    democratization, peace and reconciliation and

    good governance, it recognizes the importance

    o creating policy that is coherent with those

    working towards poverty alleviation in Burma.

    Thereore, EBO sees itsel as a bridge between

    the development world and actors working

    towards democracy and human rights, knowing

    that both parties are essential to the achievement

    o a long-term transition to democracy in Burma,

    where the citizens o Burma will be ree rom

    want, ear and discrimination, including a

    holistic approach to human rights in its own

    activities and priorities.

    1 Taken rom CONCORDs Rights-based approach sub-

    group, discussion paper on a rights-based approach to de-

    velopment, June 2006

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    7/52

    Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report 5

    Both National Reconcilia-

    tion Programme (NR P)and EBO projects

    ollowed the same guidelines

    and had the same reporting re-

    quirements. Projects that could

    not be unded through the NRP

    process either because they did

    not all within the mandate o

    the NRP or were more politi-

    cally sensitive (security condi-

    tions due to implementation

    inside Burma), were reerred by

    the NRP to EBO or unding. In the same way, less politically

    sensitive projects and those that were reconciling in nature

    were reerred by EBO to the NRP or unding.

    A major dierence between the two was that the NRP pub-

    lished all its guidel ines and requirements, while EBO did not,

    although they were essentially the same. The NRP unding

    decision process was and continues to be very transparent and

    accountable through its 18-member Programme Committee

    o stakeholders, which makes all o its decisions public. The

    EBO decision process was not ormally recorded (or security

    reasons) although a large number o stakeholders were con-

    sulted inormally.

    Another dierence was that while NRP had dedicated project

    and administrative sta in Thailand to monitor and report on

    NRP activ ities, EBO did not have the same level o stang due

    to concerns about high overheads in Europe. This sometimes

    led to a less-than-satisactory reporting process or EBO

    direct unded projects.

    To refect the increasing compleities in programming,

    administ ration and security, it became necessar y and prudent

    to review the management structure and administrative

    capacity o EBO. In response, the management and adminis-

    trative structures we re-organised as ollows:

    In the beginning, the overall

    EBO programme wasmanaged as ollows:

    Funding Structureof EBO activities

    EURO-BURMA OFFICE:

    A COORDINATED STRUCTUR E

    Associates to Develop Democratic Burma, Inc (ADDB) in

    Canada is the legal headquarters o EBO. Board meetings and

    annual general meetings o the members o ADDB usually

    take place in Canada. There are currently 18 members o

    ADDB, o which 5 represent the boa rd.

    The office in Brussels

    The administrative centre o EBO is based in Brussels. It

    provides inormation to the international community through

    its website (daily news, brieng papers and political analyses).

    It also coordinates donor unding or projects which take place

    in Burma or on its borders. It assists and supports Burmese

    organisations to lobby the European Institut ions when needed.

    It acilitates EBO analysis and research.

    The office in New Delhi

    EBO India became unctional on 1 January 20 07 and is based

    in New Delhi. EBO India develops contacts with Members

    o Parliament (MPs), politicians, bureaucrats, academics,

    journalists and activists in India. EBO India also disseminates

    inormation by sending out EBO analyses and brieng papers,

    as well as relevant statements by other Burmese organizat ions.

    The oce has also acilitated visits to India or the ENC and

    other organisations such as the Womens League o Chinland,Burma Online Library, Christian Solidarity Worldwide,

    Humanitarian Aid Relie Trust, Burma Assist, and Dutch

    Young Socialists . EBO India also works on research activities

    such as giving talks, as well as meeting with researchers,

    students, lmmakers, etc.

    The office in Chiang Mai

    In Chiang Mai, the EBO has an administrative role along

    with project coordination with project implementers. The aim

    o the oce in Thailand is to collect narrative and nancial

    reports rom project partners and ensure they are correct

    and can be reported to donors. It also aims to ma ke sure that

    all the decisions o the various programme committees are

    adhered to, and that donor requirements are met. The project

    managers and ocers are also in charge o monitoring projects

    and making sure that the unds are spent according to plan.

    aBout uS

    ADDB Inc(Montreal)

    Euro-Burma Ofce(Brussels)

    EBO India

    (New Delhi)

    EBO Foundation

    (Chiang Mai)

    EBODirector

    nrpci

    nrppe

    Fiedie

    oepes

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    8/52

    6 Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report

    ADDBBoard

    Executive Director

    EBOProject Ofcer

    OperationsDirector

    EBO IndiaProject Manager

    EBO FoundationProject Manager

    EBO BelgiumProject Manager

    Operations

    Overamanagementand governance

    OperationsDirector

    Admin & Europe

    DirectorResearchDirector

    FinanceDirector

    NRPProject Ofcer Civil SocietyProject Ofcer

    NRPprojects

    Civi Societyprojects

    Projects onwestern borders

    EBO directunded projects

    aBout uS

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    9/52

    Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report 7

    Admin & EuropeDirector

    Administration

    EBO IndiaManager

    EBO FoundationManager

    EBO BelgiumManager

    FinanceDirector

    Finance

    EBO IndiaAccountant

    EBO FoundationAccountant

    EBO BelgiumAccountant

    NRPprojects

    Civi Societyprojects

    Projects onwestern borders

    EBO directunded projects

    ProjectBookkeepers

    ProjectBookkeepers

    ProjectBookkeepers

    ProjectBookkeepers

    Consultant

    Projects onwestern borders

    EBO Directunded projects

    NRPAdmin Ofcer

    Civil SocietyAdmin Ofcer

    NRPprojects

    Civi Societyprojects

    aBout uS

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    10/52

    8 Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report

    AUDITORS

    ADDB accounts in Canada are audited by Michael A. King,

    C.A. o London, Ontario.

    EBO accounts in Brussels, Belgium

    are audited by:

    a Norwegian Funds SCPRL Joiris, Rousseaux & Co,Reviseurs dentreprises associs, Mons, Belgium.

    b Swedish Funds Price Waterhouse CoopersOhrlings, Stockholm, Sweden.

    c Other Funds Price Waterhouse CoopersOhrlings, Stockholm, Sweden.

    EBO accounts in New Delhi, India, are audited by P rice

    Waterhouse Coopers Ohrlings, S tockholm, Sweden.

    EBO accounts in Chiang Mai,

    Thailand, are audited by:

    a Danish NRP Funds Mr DhanatatHattakitthatree authorized auditor no. 5018,Excellent Consultant, Bangkok, Thailand

    b EIDHR Funds Price WaterhouseCoopers Ohrlings, Stockholm, Sweden.

    c Other Funds Price Waterhouse CoopersOhrlings, Stockholm, Sweden.

    aBout uS

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    11/52

    Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report 9

    EBOFundedProjects

    For security reasons, EBO

    consults only with relevantadvisors or each project.

    5-memberEBO Project

    Committee

    EBO Paneo Resource

    peope

    I necessary,the poject

    can berecommended

    to other unders

    EBO OfceProject

    Proposas

    Other

    Funders

    EBO FUNDING DECISIONS:

    Decisions on unding activities along the

    borders o Burma (in Thailand, China, India

    and Bangladesh) are made through already

    eisting str uctures such as the National Recon-

    ciliation Programme (NRP) and committees /

    resource groups or other projects.

    EBO direct-unded projects and activities

    inside Burma that are more sensitive in terms

    o the security o the implementers are carried

    out in a low-prole and condential manner in

    ormal consultations with local stakeholders

    and relevant members o the EBO panel o

    resource people.

    For proposals submitted to the NRP, please

    see page 40.

    aBout uS

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    12/52

    10 Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report

    Targets

    and priorities

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    13/52

    Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report 11

    Euro-Burma OfficeEBO target groups and priorities

    EBO has activities and

    operations in the ollowing

    geographic locations:

    Burma

    Europe

    AsiaNorth America

    1

    2

    3

    4

    1 Harn Yawnghwe, Executive Director o Euro-Burma Oce with Padoh Saw Ba Thinn, Karen National Union2 EBO Consultation December 2009 3/4 Working group discussions at EBO consultation 2008

    Priority target groups

    o EBO include:

    Political parties, politicalactivists and organizations,

    Civil society and community-based organizations,

    The international communityespecially the United Nationsand relevant governments.

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    14/52

    12 Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report

    In Burma, political parties and civil society

    groups are not commonly known or theirpolicies. They tend to be known by their

    leaders who usually come rom reputable

    amil ies. Decisions are taken by the leader and

    ollowed by the party or organisation. When

    there is a change in leadership, party members

    may decide to stay with the old leadership

    and orm another organization. Furthermore,

    many societies in Burma are traditional and

    hierarchical. Thereore, the process o democ-

    ratisation in Burma sometimes has to overcome

    cultural barriers and can be time-consuming.

    EBO is endeavouring, step by step, to supportleaders who want to see a change in the stat us

    quo and who understand the importance o the

    ormation o democratic political parties and

    civil society organisations based on principles

    and the rights o individuals.

    EBO believes strongly in the process o democ-

    ratization, rather than placing the emphasis

    on dramatic, overnight changes. With this in

    mind, the long term development and capacity

    building o Burmese political groups and

    individuals and civil society in Burma is at the

    core o the EBO approach. The ocus is on thecreation o policy towards a transition. The

    international community can then support this

    strategic vision through the dierent tools

    they have at their disposal.

    In his recent book, David Steinberg states that:

    Democracy is neither inevitable nor inaccessible inMyanmar. I it were to come, it would not be instantly bornully ormed rom the head o some Zeus-like person orevent. Democracies evolve, oten in unbalanced directions,and political cultures also evolve to accommodate and thenencourage democratic continuity and deepening. A politicalsystem recognized internationally as a democracy is cer-tainly possible over time in that country. But to expect thateven a peaceul transer o power to a real civilian regimewould automatically, ipso-acto, result in such a system,which seems to be the unsophisticated international mantra

    o the moment, is more than unrealistic. That is not to claimthat there should not be political change, just that evolutionis ar more likely than revolution in this instance. The rangeo criteria to dene democracy is complex, and elections are just one element in that process [...] Because democracyis a process, there are intermediate stages that might beencouraged. The most obvious is some orm o politicalpluralism. Fostering this development is possible throughthe assistance in the development o civil society [...] Evenunder the present administration, these organizations havegrown [...] and they were give a

    great impetus by Cyclone Nargis[...] For them to have an impact ondemocratic growth, there needs tobe close interplay among networkso such organizations.

    David SteinbergBurma/Myanmar:What Everyone Needs

    to Know, Oord

    University Press, 2010

    pp 172-175

    Within each o the groups identied,

    the EBO pays special attention to the

    disenranchised, particularly:

    Women

    YouthEthnic minorities

    Religious minorities

    One o EBOs aspirations is to draw in

    groups that are let out o the democratic

    political process. The word disenran-

    chised communities reers to groups o

    people who were not previously included

    in the negotiation process o the demo-

    cratic movement.

    For eample, in 1990, ater the National

    League or Democracy (NLD) won the

    elections in 1990, international unding

    agencies began unding the Burmese

    democracy movement. However, ethnic

    nationality groups were generally not

    unded. Even the National Council o

    the Union o Burma (NCUB) could not

    be unded because its membership

    included the National Democratic Front

    (NDF) a key ethnic organization.

    The ear amongst unders was that i

    ethnic groups are unded, they could be

    contributing to armed confict because

    some ethnic groups are armed.

    In 1997, these groups continued to be

    ecluded rom political discussions. The

    inclusion and active part icipation o these

    groups in the democratic polit ical process

    then became an important point o ocus

    or EBO. Thanks to the will and energy o

    these ormerly disenranchised groups,

    their activities have been so successul

    that they are now widely accepted as

    political partners in negotiations. The

    blossoming o this new landscape within

    the disenranchised communities is very

    encouraging or the uture o Burma, and

    the quality o participation rom young

    people and women in politics is deeply

    linked to the sustainability o a peaceul,

    democratic society. This achievement is

    o great signicance when one considers

    that 10 years ago the movement was

    almost eclusively led by older men who

    were leaders o either political parties or

    military groups.

    tarGEtS and prIorItIES

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    15/52

    Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report 13

    With the empowerment o disenranchised

    communities and a rights-based approach atthe heart o the overall EBO programme, ad-

    vocacy naturally becomes a mainstreamed and

    integrated element o all EBO activities.

    A common denition and understanding o

    advocacy is:A set o targeted actions in support

    o a cause or an issue, because one wants to

    build support or that cause or issue, infuence

    others to support it, or try to infuence or change

    legislation that aects it.

    There are a number of different

    advocacy techniques and

    strategies including:

    a Awareness raising and public campaignson a particular issue;

    b Lobbyingpolicy makers and decisionmakers to infuence legislation or tomobilize resources to meet an unmet need;

    c Networking bringing togetherindividuals or groups to work togetheror a common purpose;

    d Data collection and researchto promoteor acilitate a particular issue

    e Facilitation o community level attitudinal

    and behavioural change.

    AdvocacyIndividual elements o these var ious advocacy

    strategies are refected in detail in the reporto each activit y/priority o the EBO, which are

    both domestic and international.

    Since 1997, EBO has acilitated the lobbying

    eorts o the Burmese democracy movement,

    including or eample, the National Coalition

    Government o the Union o Burma (NCGUB),

    the Womens League o Burma (WLB), the

    Ethnic Nationalities Council (ENC), youth or-

    ganisations, and civil society organisations, etc.

    EBO has also enabled the individuals and

    organisations in the Burmese democracy

    movement to carry out necessary research

    and data collection to acilitate advocacy, as

    discussed in later sections.

    Networking towards a common goal is a key

    element o every EBO activity a nd the process

    o changing attitudes and behaviours is a

    crucial element o the EBO programme, as

    also demonstrated in later sections.

    tarGEtS and prIorItIES

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    16/52

    14 Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report

    Despite Aung San Suu Kyis leadership o the National League or

    Democracy (NLD), women had long remained a minority within t heleadership o the Burmese democracy and ethnic movements. Prior

    to 1999 there was no organized independent organisation representing

    women. Women were eectively ecluded rom the political process.

    However, women orm the backbone o Burmese society and needed to be

    more involved in the politica l process. Thereore, EBO has made it a priority

    to und organisations and projects to support the inclusion o women in the

    democratic movement.

    WomenEBO unded the rst orum o womens organi-

    sations, which paved the way or the creationo a governance structure and the overall

    programme objectives o the Womens Leag ue

    o Burma (WLB), which was successully

    established on 9 December 1999.

    Today, through the WLB, women are

    represented on all major committees and

    delegations. Although EBO still unds a small

    percentage o their annual budget (appro

    15%), the WLB has become such a crucial and

    dynamic organisation that they now receive

    unds rom many dierent donors. They actively

    contribute to policy development and thedevelopment o strategic objectives ensuring

    that the perspective and needs o women

    are refected. The participation o women

    in a broad range o activities is now taken or

    granted. Until WLB was ormed, women had

    no major role in the political decision making

    process, and the idea o including women in the

    movement has changed the dynamics o the

    movement. The Ethnic Nationalities Council

    (ENC) has made a quota o 30% o the board or

    women, and the WLB is a member o the ENCs

    Strategy Coordination Committee (SCC). The

    acceptance o the role o women in politicalinrastructure especially decision making

    bodies has certainly changed the dynamics

    o the movement and the society's perception

    o the role o women. There is not yet gender

    parity in leadership structures, but the dynamic

    has certainly changed over the last 10 years.

    1/2 An NRP unded meeting:photos taken ater successullyorming the WLB on 9 Dec 1999

    WLB and its member organisa-

    tions are part o the demo-

    cratic movements lobbying

    to seek support rom the international

    community or meaningul political

    change in Burma. The WLB and its mem-

    ber organisations have also had a major

    impact on international perceptions o

    the political problems o Burma and

    the abusive role o the State Peace and

    Development Council (SPDC). Women

    delegates are included in all delegations

    and lobbying activities. Policy papers

    developed by the WLB and Mon, Shan,

    Kachin, Karen, Chin, Palaung and Lahu

    womens groups have had a major impact

    on the political process both domesti-

    cally and internationally. For eample,

    the publication oLicense to Rape by the

    Shan Womens Action Network (SWAN)

    and the WLB had a major world-wide

    impact in increasing the international

    prole o the political and human rights

    abuses by the SPDC.

    The Shadow Report presented in 2008 by

    women rom various Burmese womens

    groups through the WLB to the UN

    CEDAW (Committee on the Elimination

    o all orms o Discrimination Against

    Women) is another eample o this.

    The report met international standards

    (many o their recommendations were

    taken up by the ocial committee

    report) and showed the level o womens

    awareness on gender equity issues

    related to Burma, which was much

    higher than the Burmese governmental

    NGOs sent to the CEDAW review by the

    military regime.

    1

    2

    tarGEtS and prIorItIES

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    17/52

    Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report 15

    Youth are also an important

    constituency in the movement.Like womens groups, EBO has

    empowered youth in their activities, as

    well as encouraging active partic ipation

    in policy making processes. Two youth

    umbrella organizations, the Nationali-

    ties Youth Forum (NY Forum) and the

    Students and Youth Congress o Burma

    (SYCB), are members o the Strat-

    egy Coordination Committee (SCC)

    and play an important role in Strategic

    Consultation Meetings (SCM). The

    constituencies represented within the

    democratic movement have been e-

    tended by the involvement o the youth

    groups. Recognizing and accepting the

    role o youth in political inrastructure

    has not only given more legitimacy to

    the broader mandate o the movement,

    but has also mobilized a huge sector

    o the population to get involved in the

    political process.

    The EBO, primarily through the NRP,

    has supported the NY Forum anorganisation where youth rom dierent

    ethnic backgrounds work together on

    areas o common interest such as the

    environment, land conscation, human

    rights, youth capacity building, etc.

    For eample, EBO has supported the

    Karen Youth Organization (KYO) to

    do a Youth Political Advocacy training.

    EBO had originally hoped that the

    youth, like the women, would be able to

    orm an umbrella organisation like the

    Womens League o Burma, however

    this has proven to be very dicult given

    the many dierent youth organisations

    even within one ethnic group. The

    strategy now is to enable youth to work

    together on specic issues, such as

    environmental challenges. While ethnic

    youth have achieved recognition in the

    Burmese democratic movement, it is

    worth mentioning that they have also

    established and maintained ecellent

    grassroots networks within their com-munities inside Burma.

    EBO has unded, among others, the

    ollowing youth organizations - Stu-

    dents and Youth Congress o Burma

    (SYCB), Nationalities Youth Forum

    (NYF), All Kachin Students and Youth

    Union (AKSYU), Chin Students &

    Youth Federation (CSY F), Karen Youth

    Organization (KYO) through Karen

    State Coordinating Body, Karenni

    National Youth Organization (KNYO),

    Kayan New Generation Youth (KNGY),Mon Youth Progressive Organization

    (MYPO), Shan Youth Committee, Shan

    Youth Power, Kaw Dai (Shan State

    Youth), All Arakan Students and Youth

    Congress (A ASYC), United Lahu Youth

    Organizat ion (ULYO).

    Youth

    3Mon Youth Seminar 2009 4 Karen Youth Conerence

    As an ethnic youth alliance, NY Forum is being recognized by otheralliances as an important group o Burmas democracy and ethnic movement.

    NY Forum has chance to be member o SCC and can have the same levelo policy making with other alliances. Ethnic youths voice are recognizedand welcomed. NY Forum is ully participating, cooperating and takingresponsibility in the SCC, SCM... NY Forum is also taking responsibility as acoordinator to orm broad based alliances o movement.

    AungNaing Soe

    General

    Secretary

    o NY Forum

    3 4

    tarGEtS and prIorItIES

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    18/52

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    19/52

    Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report 17

    EBO believes that the empowerment and

    inclusion o religious minorities in thepolitical process are very important

    or the movement in order to establish a

    durable solution to decade-long problems.

    The movement has positively responded to

    this and has started to apply this concept to

    reality. Instead o ecluding minorities, EBO

    has worked to include these communities into

    the political process. An eample o this is the

    work with Rohingya communities. The Araka n

    people live in Ara kan state which borders Chin

    State, Burma and Bangladesh. The majority o

    the Arakanese are either Buddhist or Muslim,

    and there have been conficts between these

    two religious groups in the past. Prior to 1999,

    the our Arakan polit ical organisations did not

    talk to each other and at times ought each

    other. The Muslim Rohingya in Arakan State

    are denied citizenship by the SPDC, and prior

    to 1999 they were ignored by the Burmese

    democracy movement. The Rohingyas attempts

    to be recognized and included in the political

    mainstream were rejected.

    Beginning in 2000, EBO began working with

    dierent Rohingya groups to build internal

    unity and to include them in discussions aboutthe uture Union o Burma. In 2008, the Arakan

    Rohingya Council was ormed. It includes the

    three main Rohingya political organisations

    and civil society actors. Through negotiations

    with EBO, the Organisation o the IslamicConerence (OIC) has decided to sponsor a

    Rohingya Unity Seminar and has tasked EBO

    to work with appropriate civil society and

    political leaders in order to encourage the

    unity and reconciliation process. In principle,

    the Arakan National Council (ANC) has also

    agreed to work together with the Rohingya.

    EBO has also provided nancial support or the

    advocacy work o the Arakan Project, which

    conducts valuable research and advocates

    on behal o the Rohingya (both those inside

    Burma and those living outside as reugees).The Arakan Project is the primary organisation

    to be consulted by the UN, international

    governments and other members o the

    international community on key issues related

    to the Rohingya.

    Religiousminorities tarGEtS and prIorItIES

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    20/52

    18 Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report

    Key achievements

    and challenges

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    21/52

    Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report 19

    Activities of the EBO :Key achievements and challenges

    1 Harn Yawnghwe taking part in a panel discussion on Burma 2 Global Conversation onDemocracy and Democratisation organized by the Centre or the Study o DevelopingSocieties in New Delhi, India 3 Ethnic Nationalities Council (ENC) meeting with theIndian Parliamentarian Forum or Democracy in Burma ( IPFDB)

    All photos are related to policy briengs and advocacy work

    (see overlea on page 20 or more inormation)

    This section gives an overview o some o the

    key activity areas o the EBO over the past13 years and oers some refections on the

    successes and challenges o the activiti es.

    Activities of the EBO have

    principally included:

    a Strategic analysis, policy briengs andrecommendations, and news updates

    b Support or intra- and inter-ethnicpolitical consultations to resolve conficts(predominantly supported through theNational Reconciliation Programme)

    c Support or broad-based political

    inrastructures to develop commonstrategies and priorities (predominantlysupported through the NationalReconciliation Programme)

    d Support or a primary database to enablethe planning o a comprehensive humanresources development programme

    e Support or internships andcapacity building programmes

    f Support or media and inormation projects

    It should be highlighted here that EBO does not

    directly implement projects. EBO principally

    unds projects and activities that are within itsobjectives, which are proposed and implemented

    by the stakeholders o the communities. The

    successul outcomes o any o the ollowing

    activit ies are dependent on the commitment and

    hard work o the project implementers and the

    communities themselves.

    1

    2

    3

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    22/52

    20 Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report

    Internationally, EBO has been successul in

    raising awareness on the comple situationin Burma. As with all areas o EBO activities,

    EBO has actively encouraged the participation

    o ormerly disenranchised Burmese groups

    in international policy. EBO has acilitated the

    participation o Burmese women, youth, and

    ethnic groups and religious minorities into

    international policy orums. The inclusion o

    these groups has depended and broadened the

    policies o the international community, and

    changed perceptions. The ethnic nationalities

    are now seen by the international community

    as equal partners in political and constitutional

    reorm, and international policies better refect

    their needs and aspirations.

    EBO activities to mobilize international

    support were initially through lobbying but

    increasingly are or policy development and

    strategic planning. EBO helped orge an

    international consensus to maintain political

    pressure on the Burmese milita ry regime whileconcurrently eploring alternate strategies

    to promote a transition and to provide more

    humanitarian aid to an increasingly vulnerable

    population. EBO also aims to ensure that

    concerns and aspirations o individuals and

    civil society groups working inside Burma

    towards democratic reorms are disseminated

    to the international community without risking

    their personal or proessional security.

    EBO disseminates inormation on develop-

    ments within Burma to governments and

    decision-makers, parliamentarians, politicalgroups and parties, and NGOs. EBO provides

    the international community with inormation

    on developments within the ethnic groups, the

    Burmese democratic movement and the SPDC.

    It also bries governments on parti cular topics

    as requested.

    The EBO raises

    awareness onBurma issues

    internationally,

    with a focus on:

    the United Nations (UN),

    Asia (principallyIndia, China & otherneighbouring countries,ASEAN and Japan),

    Australia

    Institutions and MemberStates o the EuropeanUnion (and also other

    non-EU countriessuch as Norway andSwitzerland), and

    North America(USA and Canada)

    1 Strategic analyses, policybriefings and recommendations,and news updates

    Burmas huge problems in terms o

    ongoing confict in ethnic areas,

    lack o social inrastructure

    (such as health and education) and

    increasing poverty have not only had animpact inside Burma, but also across its

    borders in Thailand, China, India, and

    Bangladesh. These unresolved issues

    raise concerns or regional stability,

    and EBO has ocussed on brieing

    neighbouring countries to create a

    common perception o the situation

    and to appeal to the sel interests o

    the neighbouring countries. Burma is

    not the top oreign policy priority or any

    Asian country, but many now recognize

    that the milit ary does not have the will or

    the ability to resolve Burmas problemsand that the status quo could lead to

    urther instability. However, they are not

    willing to interere publically.

    EBO supports the ENCs call or

    multi-party talks on Burma as a pos-

    sible international ormat or strategic

    international talks on Burma. The

    multi-par ty talks would ollow a similar

    ormat to the North Korea Si Party

    Talks, only w ith the inclusion o the U N.

    The principles o national sovereignty,

    territorial integrity o the Union and

    national control o the process o

    change would need to be maintained.

    Multi-party talks could have a number

    o possible concrete benets increasedhumanitarian aid and cross border

    assistance, technical assistance rom

    the World Bank and stronger strategies

    to combat social issues, such as health

    and education. Hence, EBO is working

    on a long-term political and diplomatic

    approach in order to prepare Burma or

    a sustainable political transition and

    asks the support o the international

    community on this initiative.

    This consensus paved the way or the

    ormation o the Tripartite Core Group

    . the SPDC, ASEAN, and the UN to

    deliver much needed humanitarian aid

    ater Cyclone Nargis struck in May 2008.

    The consensus has also broadened to

    include non-Western nations such as

    Japan, China, and India. EBOs crucial

    role has been recognized and it is

    requently requested to brie the United

    Nations Special Advisor to the Secretary-

    General on Burma, the European

    Commission, the EU Special Envoy or

    Burma, the Foreign Ministries o the 27

    EU-Member States, the Organisation o

    the Islamic Conerence, the Government

    o Canada, and numerous policy think-

    tanks including those in China and India.

    EBO has also participated in and unded

    numerous successul international

    meetings and conerences which have

    deepened the understanding o the

    international community on Burma

    issues. These conerences also provide

    opportunit ies or Burmese to interact with

    their international counterparts through

    lectures, seminars and conerences and

    to share understanding and epertise.

    EBO has also, since the very begin-

    ning, supported and unded a number

    o international advocacy delegationvisits rom Burmese political and civil

    society groups.

    kEy achIEvEmEntS

    and challEnGES

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    23/52

    Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report 21

    2 Support for intra-and inter-ethnic politicalconsultations to resolve conflicts

    EBO has supported through the NRP a huge

    number o intra and inter-ethnic political con-sultations to resolve conficts. Two important

    consultative processes the state constitution

    drating process and the ederal constitution

    drating process are discussed in detail in this

    chapter to highlight these processes and to indi-

    cate some key achievements and challenges.

    The grassroots work on constitutional matters

    through the State Constitution DratingCommittees (SCDCs) continues to receive

    unds rom EBO today.

    STATE CONSTITUTION

    DRAFTING PROCESS

    Both the state constitution drat-

    ing process and the ederal

    constitution process started

    with support rom EBO and NR P. When

    the ENC was created, it took over these

    initiatives through its State Coordinat-

    ing Bodies which enables them to

    connect with constituencies.

    The NRP has supported Constitution

    Drating Committees (CDCs), such as

    the Shan CDC known as Shan State Con-

    stitution Drating Committee and the Chin

    CDC, etc. The ocial name or the whole

    process is the Supporting Committee or

    State Constitutions (SCSC), which was

    initiated by the Joint Action Committee

    (JAC) o the United Nationalities League

    or Democracy Liberated Area (UNLD -

    LA) a nd the National Democratic Front

    in March 2001, but transormed into

    the SCSC in 2003. The NRP supported

    the state constitutions drating process

    through the SCSC. The First Chairman

    o SCSC was Dr. Chao Tzang Yawnghwe.

    Special allocations were earmarked or women and youth, recognising that

    these groups need special attention in

    the process. C onstitutional development

    committees are now operating in all

    states and each o them has produced

    at least the rst drats o their respec-

    tive state constitutions. Constitutional

    consultations are on-going in all states.

    All state constitutional development ac-

    tivities a re now coordinated through the

    State Coordinating Bodies, which are

    ormed under the ENC, ecept or Shan

    State. Constitutional positions refectedin the New Panglong Spirit have been

    adopted by consensus by all groups.

    The basic principles or rebuilding the

    Union o Burma dened in 2004 as part

    o the Ethnic Nationalities Solidarity

    and Cooperation Committee work on the

    New Panglong Initiative (supported by

    the NRP) remain as critica l today as they

    were when they were rst envisioned.

    The si basic principles are:

    a A peaceul resolution o the crisis

    in the Union,b The resolution o political problems

    through political dialogue,

    c Respect or the will o the people,

    d The recognition and protection othe rights o all citizens o the Union,

    e The recognition and protection othe identity, language, religion, andcultural rights o all nationalities, and

    f The recognition and protection othe rights o the constituent stateo the Union through a ederalarrangement.

    1 2

    1 Jack Sterken and Dr. Lian Sakhong2 Khaing Mar Kyaw Zaw and Rimon Htoo at an ENC meeting

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    24/52

    22 Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report

    1st step

    Members o the state constitution drating committees andleaders participated in a series o workshops and seminars on

    ederalism and states-ederal relations, which also included

    echanges, discussions and debates. These discussions took

    place between leaders o the movement within an intra- and

    inter-ethnic dialogue.

    The rst State Constitution Seminar was held in August 2001,

    organised by the JAC. The guiding pr inciples and rameworks

    were discussed by leaders and participants rom various

    ethnic nationalities within a state ormat. The outcome was

    the ormation o constitution drating committees. The

    state constitutions drating or a rather study and eplora-

    tion process continued apace with a landmark workshop/seminar where part icipants (which included leaders rom the

    big political groups, various organisations and members o

    state constitution drating committees) were presented with

    a model state constitution, compiled rom state constitutions

    o the United States o America. This workshop was jointly

    organized by the NDF and the UNLD-LA.

    2nd step

    This step started with study tours and eploration o state

    constitutions in other eisting ederations in the world. The

    participants were members o the Federal Constitution Drat-

    ing Committee and State Constitution Drating bodies. Thestudy group toured Germany and Belgium and met members

    o state governments, and state assemblies or legislat ures and

    held discussions and briengs. They also consulted with con-

    stitutional eperts and scholars. The group also studied local

    governments, where the participants ga ined some knowledge

    and an understanding o how local governments unctioned

    and were run in a democratic, decentralized system , through

    many briengs and discussions wit h mayors and members o

    the local government councils, in both Germany and Belgium .

    Other ederal education trips were in Thailand and to Berlin

    (Seminar o December 2002 and 2003).

    3rd step

    There were, and continue to be, regular consultations with

    grassroots communities, leaders, political parties, academics,

    and other interested and concerned parties.

    4th step

    Workshops were held to discuss the completed rst drats

    o the various state constitutions. Participants included

    members o the various state constitution drating bodies,the ederal constitution drating committee, political leaders,

    representatives rom womens and youth groups, and leaders

    rom ethnic-based organisations. Eperts or persons with

    knowledge o state constitutions and local governments (in

    decentralized democratic systems) acilitated discussions

    and claried points that needed clari cation or elaboration.

    The rst workshop looked at the rst drat o the Chin State

    Constitution written by the drating committee. The drat

    Chin State Constitut ion was discussed widely and etensively

    by the participants and resource persons, beore eamining

    the work done by the other drating committee o other

    constituent states.

    kEy achIEvEmEntS

    and challEnGES

    1

    1 Participants on the way to an ENC conerence 2 Meetingto establish the Ethnic Nationalities Council at Law Khi Lah3 Conerence participants having dinner

    3

    2

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    25/52

    Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report 23

    It might be noted that the end goal othe state constitutions drating process is notto produce actual state constitutions, but toprepare leaders, activists, the politically awaresegments, and as well the grassroots or a timeto come in the near uture when a new Union willbe rebuilt. The aim rather is to arm the peoplewith an awareness and knowledge about con-stitutions and how they relate most signicantlyto the aspirations o the ethnic nationalities orreedom, sel-determination, sel-rule, human

    security, human dignity,rights that are alien-able to every man andwoman.

    The process o creating these

    drat state constitutions has

    created an environment or all

    ethnic groups to come together, discuss

    challenges and aspirations and to create

    a strategy to act collectively within andamong ethnic groups. For eample, the

    Shan State Constitution Drating Com-

    mittee (SS CDC) is an ecellent eample

    o how the dierent non-Shan ethnic

    groups in Shan State (Kachin, Lahu, Wa,

    Pa-O, Lisu etc...) became involved in the

    constitutional process and were able to

    open lines o communication. To make

    these drat state constitutions accessi-

    ble and acceptable to the constituencies

    and to the militar y government remains

    a challenge. However, EBO, through

    the Ethnic Nationalities Council (ENC),continues to acilitate the process

    by reaching out to constituencies and

    continues to strengthen this process.

    Preparation or building a ederal union

    began with drating state constitutions in

    each state, but there are other challenges

    that still need to be addressed. There re-

    mains the need or more cooperation and

    coordination among ethnic nationalities on

    many other issues such as human resourc-

    es management, inormation gathering,

    data collection and knowledge echange.

    The creation o the ENC came out rom

    the need o the ethnic nationalities move-

    ment. All ethnic nationalities share the

    common goal o rebuilding Burma as a

    ederal democratic state and they are all

    willing to work together in cooperationwith Burman counterparts. There was a

    need or more coordinat ion among ethnic

    people to nd solutions and prepare or a

    democratic transition. The constitution

    drating process provided a platorm

    that could be used or policy making

    and policy coordination on other matters

    and in response to urgent humanitarian

    needs. These considerations urged the

    ethnic nationalit ies to look into a broader,

    more ecient approach and cooperation,

    which resulted in creating the ENC.

    Drawing up state constitutions in each

    state is an initial and important step

    or the uture o Burma. Civilians rom

    each state should have access to the

    constitutions as they are the intended

    beneciaries. There should also be

    opportunities or ethnic states to study

    constitutions rom other ethnic states

    in order to encourange understanding

    and cooperation while the needs are

    sometimes very dierent rom one state

    to another, learning rom one another is

    the cornerstone o the democratic process.

    One particularly good eample o a

    successul state constitution drating

    process is the eample rom Chin State.

    Prior to 1999, the Chin community was

    divided into at least 8 actions and two

    armed-groups. In 1998, a meeting wasorganised in Ottawa by EBO and the

    International Center or Human Rights.

    Dierent clans rom Chin State met

    together and at the end o this meeting,

    the Chin Forum was ormed. This

    pan-Chin platorm includes dierent

    Chin organisations and individuals

    who come together to discuss issues

    concerning Chin people and the Union

    o Burma. From discussions at the Chin

    Forum, a political consensus was ormed

    and eventually led to the creation o

    the Chinland Constitution Drating

    Committee, which is a model or other

    ethnic groups. Due to consistent support

    rom EBO or Chin political consultation,

    the Political Aairs Committee o

    Chinland was able to be created in 2004

    and subsequently the Chin National

    Council was established in 2006. This

    is a state coordinating body o the Chin

    people made up o Chin civil society and

    political organisations. It is working

    in line with the ENC policy toward re-

    building the Union.

    Dr. Chao TzangYawnghwe

    Working on the dratChin State Constitution

    kEy achIEvEmEntS

    and challEnGES

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    26/52

    24 Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report

    FEDERAL CONSTITUTION

    DRAFTING PROCESS

    The ENC is committed to rebuilding the

    Federal Union o Burma based on the spirit o

    the Panglong Agreement which will guarantee

    democratic rights, political equality, and sel-

    determination. The initiative o preparing

    or ederalism in Burma started even beore

    ENC was ormed. The ENC will continue the

    process until ederalism is well established

    in Burma.

    To rebuild the Federal Union o Burma in the

    spirit o Panglong will require the undamental

    rights or all citizens to be guaranteed. The

    oundation o this is the United Nations

    Declaration o Universal Human Rights, and

    the principles o indivisibility o human rights

    and non-discrimination.

    T

    he process o ormulating the

    basic principles or the uture

    Federal Constitution o the Union

    o Burma began in May 2004. In Septem -

    ber 2004, the Joint Action Committee

    (JAC) was ormed to drat the basic

    principles. The JAC had 9 members :

    the National Coalition Government o

    the Union o Burma ( NCGUB), National

    Council o Union o Burma (NCUB),

    National Democratic Front (NDF),

    United Nationalities League or De-

    mocracy Liberated Areas (UNLD-LA)

    and Womens League o Burma (WLB)

    in collaboration with the Federal Con-

    stitution Drating Committee (FCDC)and Supporting Committee or State

    Constitutions (SCSC). The aspiration is

    to produce basic principles or a uture

    Federal Constitution o the Union o

    Burma as General Aung San did in

    1947, which could be used to respond e-

    ectively to SPCDs National Convention

    (the 6 objectives including 104 Art icles)

    and Road Map, and which could bring

    peace and democracy to the countr y.

    Between October 2004 and February

    2005, the JAC conducted ve meetings-cum-workshops. The JAC worked as

    neutral body rather than as group o

    political organisations, and the main

    task o the JAC was to produce the

    legal ramework o the principles.

    The JAC applied three approaches in

    ormulating the Basic Principles or the

    Future Union o Burma - identiying

    the original principles o the Union o

    Burma in 1947, collecting historical

    acts and supporting documents, and

    dening and writing a concept paper

    on the Basic Principles or the Future

    Union o Burma.

    On 12 February 2005 - the Union Day

    o Burma, representatives o the Chin,

    Kachin, Karen, Ka renni, Mon, Myanmar

    (Burman), Rakhine (Arakan) and Shan

    (more than 106 representatives rom 42

    organisations, including elected MPs,

    senior leaders o ethnic nationalities

    and political parties, and representa-

    tives o women and youth organisations)

    met and agreed that the political crisis

    in present Burma is not an ideological

    conrontation between a democracy

    and totalitarianism, but a constitutional

    problem rooted in the question o sel-

    determination or non-Burman nation-

    alities who joined the Union o Burma as

    equal partners in 1947 at the Panglong

    Conerence. Thereore, the best way o

    solving the political crisis in Burma was

    to establish a genuine Federal Union

    based on the principles o equality or

    all ethnic nationalities, the right o sel-

    determination or all member states othe Union, and democratic rights or all

    citizens o the Union o Burma. The del-

    egates unanimously endorsed the basic

    principles o sovereign power, equality,

    sel-determination, ederal principles,

    minority rights, democracy, human

    rights, gender equality, secular state,

    and a multi-party democracy system or

    the uture ederal constitution.

    At this meeting, the Basic Principles

    identied by the JAC or the Future Fed-

    eral Constitut ion o the Union o Burma

    were adopted. It was also unanimously

    decided to orm a new committee that

    would work towards orming the uture

    Federal Constitution o the Union o

    Burma with the identied Basic Prin-

    ciples. Thus, the Federal Constitution

    Drating and Coordination Committee

    (FCDCC) came into eistence on 19

    April 2005, comprising o the ollowing

    groups: NCGUB, NCUB, NDF, UNLD,

    WLB, Nationalities Youth Forum

    (NY-Forum) and Students and Youth

    Congress o Bur ma (SYCB).

    The FCDCC presented the rst drat o

    the Federal Constitution o the Union

    o Burma at the Federal Constitution

    seminar held rom 6 to 9 April 2006,

    which was adopted by 101 participants

    rom 52 organizations, including demo-

    cratic orces and ethnic nationalities.

    Subsequently, the FCDCC adopted the

    second drat o its constitution or the

    Federal Republic o the Union o Burma

    in February 2008 .

    EBO has unded the process o ederal

    constitutional drating through the JAC,

    the FCDCC and the member organisa-

    tions o the FCDCC since the beginning,

    although such a pivotal process has also

    attracted unding rom additional donors.

    kEy achIEvEmEntS

    and challEnGES

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    27/52

    Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report 25

    The development o broad-based inrastructure includes

    support to ormerly disenranchised groups such as women, youth and religious minorities. These were discussed in

    detail previously.

    The speciic role o the Ethnic Nationalities Council (ENC)

    as a critical broad-based inrastructure has not yet been

    discussed in detail, thereore an analysis o the successes

    and challenges o the ENC is included in this section in

    greater depth.

    T

    he development o the ENC into a

    major player on both the domes-

    tic and international scene has

    provided unprecedented opportunities

    or input by the ethnic and disenran-

    chised communities o Burma. These

    communities now have a structure

    mandated to negotiate political issues

    relating to establishing democratic gov-

    ernance in Burma. Work inside Burma

    epanded beyond all epectations.

    This rapid epansion was the product

    o both the political and constitutional

    priorities developed with the support o

    the NRP, and the events driven by the

    imposition o the SPDC constitut ion andreerendum in 2008. These events, in

    addition to the Cyclone Nargis disaster,

    have created unprecedented fuidity in

    the political process. Preparations or

    the planned 2010 SPDC elections have

    the potential to create additional space

    or political activities and consultations

    inside Burma. The ENC is acilitating

    etensive consultations between cease-

    re groups and elected political leaders

    inside Burma and between cease-re

    leaders and political and armed groups

    on the border. These consultations arecritical or maintaining solidarity in the

    ace o intensive pressure and manipula-

    tion by the SPDC. These activities are

    an immediate consequence o the

    capacities developed, and strategies

    and policies identied by the ethnic

    and disenranchised communities with

    the support o the NR P. It is an unavoid-

    able consequence o success in political

    programming that both the range and

    intensity o activities will increase.

    The ENC was created with the specic

    mandate to coordinate any negotiating

    processes on behal o the ethnic na-

    tionalities o Burma. Its mandate is

    to coordinate the development o the

    negotiating positions, policies, priori-

    ties and constitutional proposals and to

    acilitate the meaningul participation

    o Burmas ethnic and disenranchised

    communities in negotiations with the

    NLD and SPDC to achieve democratic

    governance in Burma. Delegates to the

    ENC are currently nominated by the

    seven ethnic state coordinating bodies.

    The 1st Ethnic Nationalities Seminarwas held rom 7-14 January 1997 at Mae

    Tha Raw Hta in the base area o the

    Karen National Union (KNU), during

    which the Mae Tha Raw Hta Agree-

    ment was signed.

    The outcome o the second Ethnic

    Nationalities Seminar was the creation

    o the Ethnic Nationalities Solidarity

    andCooperationCommittee(ENSCC).

    At the 3rd Ethnic Nationalities Seminar

    in January 2004, the ENSCC was trans-

    ormed into the ENC with a broader

    mandate.

    As the process progressed, at the 4th

    Ethnic Nationalities Conerence in

    April 2005, a new structure or the ENC

    was adopted, when the ENC became

    statebased. In this new structure,

    representation to the ENC was based

    on the eisting Arakan, Chin, Kachin,

    Karen, Karenni (Kayah), Mon and

    Shan States.

    These conerences have been a very

    important part o trust building and

    have led to cooperation among ethnic

    nationalities. Through conerences,

    seminars, and workshops, dierent eth-

    nic groups have discussed dierences

    learned rom each other, tried to create

    understanding and build trust key

    ingredients or successul cooperation.

    Confict resolution workshops, semi-

    nars, and conerences were platorms

    or groups rom dierent backgrounds

    to come together, to discuss, and to

    learn more about easible solutions or

    problems within one ethnic group or

    among ethnic groups.

    The importance o the ENCs restruc-

    turing rom an organisation-based body

    to becoming the representative body

    o the seven ethnic states in the Union

    o Burma was that the past political

    landscape had been dened by armed

    groups, whereas the state coordinating

    bodies have a political coordinat ion role

    that includes all groups in the state, in-

    stead o just representing the ethnic ar-

    mies groups. This new structure orced

    all groups within each state political,civil society, and religious to work to-

    gether. This also removed the barriers

    between ceasere and non-ceasere

    groups, as well as groups operating in-

    side Burma and those outside. The ENC

    has also become the main coordinating

    body or disenranchised communities

    in Burma.

    3 Support for broad-basedpolitical infrastructures to developcommon strategies and priorities kEy achIEvEmEntSand challEnGES

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    28/52

    26 Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report

    The establishment o ENC as a state

    based organization is very important. The aimis to open up or all seven ethnic nationalityStates to work together collectively in thecommon goal o establishing the FederalUnion o Burma based on the principles othe Panglong Agreement which will guaranteedemocratic rights, political equality, and sel-determination. ENC is also working to promotea democratic system o government and toabolish all types o totalitarianism, including

    military dictatorship in Burma. Indeed, the creation o ENC is a success.

    The issues o the ethnic nationalities democrat-ic movement and their suering had not been

    highlighted or noticed beore the creation o

    ENSCC. Now, ENC has broadened the mandateo ENSCC to represent seven States. It is impor-tant to note that democracy will not necessarilyguarantee equal rights and wellbeing o ethnicnationalities. Thereore, the existence o ENC iscrucial as to establish a genuine Federal Uniono Burma, which will not come easily.

    Operationally, some State CoordinatingBodies are working well, while a ew Statesare in the process o creating State Coordinat-

    ing Bodies. It might taketimes, but eventually allState Coordinating Bod-ies will unction well.

    The coordinating bodies also organize

    workshops and consultations among their

    constituencies. The ENC has also been working

    towards investing in the uture democratic

    transition. Coordinating human resources and

    implementing projects in seven states with

    many restrictions imposed by the military

    government is a big challenge, which has

    sometimes created misunderstanding among

    members in ENC. However, the ENC has

    always overcome these challenges. In addition

    to the NRPs unding, EBO has also unded

    ENC advocacy delegations.

    Khu HtehBu Peh

    ENC Chairman in 2009

    1 Khu Hteh Bu Peh2 ENC training on operating

    digital mapping sotware3 Digital mapping activities

    The credibility o the ENC is sustained

    by improved consultations with its

    constituencies through the seven state

    coordinating councils and the broadening o

    the constituency base participating meaning-

    ully in the political process. In particular,

    ormally unrepresented youth and womens

    groups have become a major orce in strateg ic

    planning and policy development. The broad-

    ening o the constituency base and increasing

    sophistication in the political and constitutional

    positions o these communities is the basis or

    the international credibility o the ENC. This

    has resulted in broadly-based consultations

    with all major international players attempti ng

    to resolve Burmas political problems.

    Since the beginning, the NRP has supported

    the ENCs operational costs, including State

    Coordinating Bodies and Constitutional

    Development Committees. In some states, the

    Constitution Drating Committee cooperates

    with the State Coordinat ing Body.1

    kEy achIEvEmEntS

    and challEnGES

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    29/52

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    30/52

    28 Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report

    Another EBO priority is the unding o internships

    and trainings. While the EBO itsel cannot managea broad internship programme, the idea is to support

    organisations on the border which can take on interns rom

    inside Burma, train them, and send them back to work with

    their organisations inside. The internships also serve as a

    bridge to narrow the gap between educational levels in Burma

    and internationally. The internships ll a much needed void

    in the Burmese democracy movement.

    The objective o the EBO internship programme is to counter

    the brain drain being eperienced in the democracy

    movement as well-qualied reugees have resettled in third

    countries. In Burmese reugee camps based in Thailand,

    there are dierent programmes which oer resettlement tothird countries (i.e. the USA, Australia, Sweden...). This gives

    a wonderul opportunity to individuals to start a new lie and

    to learn rom democratic states. However, these programmes

    tend to cherry-pick the small number o educated elites othe disenranchised communities. Some have lost essential

    human resources, especially small communities such as the

    Karenni. When 10 teachers or 10 nurses leave, this is a disaster

    or the rest o the community, and eventual ly, once they live ar

    rom their country, many Burmese dont get involved in the

    democratic movement.

    To help counter this brain drain, EBO has ocused its training

    programme in the region. In 200 9, EBO supported programmes

    inside Burma to prepare students who are going to study in

    Thailand or India by improving their English prociency,

    while the NRP receives increasingly urgent requests to

    support human resource development programmes by state-based organisations, especial ly youth and women groups.

    5 Support forinternships and capacity-building programmes

    THREE ExAMPLES OF RECENT

    INTERNSHIPS INCLUDE:

    a Kachin Womens Associationin Thailand (KWAT) Internship

    Programme

    EBO has unded KWAT to provide an internship

    programme to young women rom Kachin State since

    the internship programme started in 200 6. The overallaim o this project is to promote womens education

    and to encourage Kachin women to increase their

    parti cipation in the various sectors o society, working

    or political, economic and social change in Burma

    through the delivery o capacity building and empow-

    erment activities.Between 2006 and 2008,KWAT has

    trained a total o 26 women, mostly in their early twen-

    ties. The cost per student is around 2,300 or 6 months

    o classroom training and a practical internship. The

    classroom training includes some o the ollowing

    courses: English, Thai, computer skills, politics, de-

    mocracy, human rights, women's rights, constitution

    drating, peace building, gender, reproductive health,environmental issues, media and communications,

    human tracking issue, documentation and research,

    proposal writing and undraising. Records kept by

    KWAT on the rst 17 young women alumnae vshow

    that every woman who graduated rom the internship

    went on to work or the Kachin communit y or another

    organisation associated with the democracy move-

    ment. The scheme has become so successul and the

    demand or training is so great, that KWAT has been

    asked to accept and train young men rom Kachin

    state as well as young women. Men were accepted into

    the programme or the rst time in 2009.

    Inside Burma, I would never have dreamed olearning about politics and various knowledge that Ilearned through the internship. It is very dicult toget the right inormation about what is happeningin the real world and in our own country. Almostall inormation is just propaganda. I believe thatto become a strong society, all individuals must

    be strong and well-empowered. When somebodygets knowledge, that person can share to his/hercommunity and society. I the civil society is welleducated and empowered, it can support theirgovernment and help to build a good country. Beorecoming and studying at KWAT internship, I wasntmuch interested in politics and education. I also didntknow much about human rights, womens rights anddemocracy. Ater completing my internship, I knewhow much education and knowledge about these

    elds are important or the civil society. Subsequently,I had known more about the injustices committedin my country as there is no rule o law under thecurrent military regime. Now I eel dierent, I eel thatI can help the democratic movement and be useulin the society. I also know that we, ethnic people,are discriminated in Burma. Thereore, I strongly eelthat this internship wasvery constructive and awonderul opportunity tounderstand my country.

    Ah Nohintern at K WAT rom July

    2007 to January 2008

    kEy achIEvEmEntS

    and challEnGES

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    31/52

    Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report 29

    In my country there is noRule o Law anywhere. Most o thepeople dont know what constitu-tion, Law, or Human Rights are. Butall this inormation is given by theKWAT internship programme. In thisinternship, I also exchanged experi-ences with other organisations. Thatis very important to me because inBurma, we dont know about theevents happening in other regions.

    For example, I am Kachin so I dontknow about the Chins sueringclearly. During the KWAT internship,I could really understand what ishappening. I am one o the sons oa revolutionary who served in KIO/KIA throughout his lie. But the Jun-ta government always interruptedmy childhood and I fed rom townto town every year. Hence, I want tobe released rom this poverty and

    always searchthe way howto change ourcountry politi-cally.

    Zau Diintern at KWAT

    rom July 2009 to

    January 2010

    KWAT interns gender training

    b School for Shan StateNationalities Youth

    (SSSNY)

    The EBO-unded School or Shan

    State Nationalities Youth (SSSNY)organizes an internship programme or

    young men and women rom Shan State .

    The SSSNY was created in 2001 and

    oers a 9-month in-depth Social Justice

    Education Programme with dierent

    types o lessons: human rights, history

    o Burma and Shan state, computer

    skills, English grammar and pronun-

    ciation, writing skills, environment,

    systems o governance and democracy

    studies, international crisis and confict

    studies, international news, basic video

    production and media studies, maths,

    basic science and health.

    The SSSNY is based in Thailand and

    aims to graduate dedicated and pro-

    active Shan State youth committed to

    social and political change by providing

    them with the necessary skills. The

    goal is to empower and educate Shan

    State youth aged 16 to 30 o dierent

    backgrounds and ethnicity, so that they

    can have a more active role in the strug-

    gle or democracy, human rights and

    gender equality.

    The school provides not only education

    and general knowledge skills, but also

    ood, acilities, pocket money, and ac-

    commodation during the programme.

    The students also learn how to do

    research so that they can be involved

    in these types o activities in the uture.

    There are also many guest speakers

    during the internship who give courses

    on issues such as HIV/AIDS, human

    rights, constitution trainings, etc.

    kEy achIEvEmEntS

    and challEnGES

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    32/52

    30 Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report

    More than a school, the SSSNY also serves as a venue or

    building trust and cooperation among the dierent ethnicnationalities rom Shan State (Shan, Pa-O, Wa, Akha, Lahu,

    Palaung, Kachin, Lisu, Miao, Intha, Danu, Kayan and

    Kokang...). In a book cal led Candles in the Dark published in

    2008, young students wrote their lie-stories and eplained

    what they learned at t he SSSN Y. Noom Wann is one o them:

    I am one o the students rom SSSNYSchool. I come rom Southern Shan State,Burma. I live in a small village. There are about50 households in my village and I have manyriends. I let the school ater I passed grade 4.

    At that time, Mong Tai Army (MTA) led by KhunSa, was the most powerul armed group inShan State against the SPDC or many years.This MTA recruited young boys rom everyhousehold in the Southern Shan State rom 7years old up. But at last , the MTA did nothing orthe Shan State and surrendered to the SPDCin 1996. Many boys were caught to be soldiersby MTA troops until 1996 and some who werein the village became drug addicts. It is easyto buy the drug (like amphetamines). We can

    buy it everywhere; even a 4 or 5 year old child

    knows how to buy it when their parents orced

    them to. Most o the young boys or girls invillages do not have chance to go to school.They have to help their parents at their work.My village is situated near by a SPDC militarycamp; whenever they come to the village, theyask the villagers about the Shan resistance.I we say we dont know anything, the SPDCsuspects we take the side o the Shan soldiersand they take us to their military camp. There,they interrogate us about everything and at

    last, i they didnt get what they wanted, theytorture us by many ways. Some were killedwithout any reason. There is no law to protectus. Everything ends by the power o the gunsin the Burmese soldiers hands. Beore I cameto Thailand, I did not knowanything, even aboutmysel. This is a light orme that I have chance tostudy in SSSNY School.

    The SSSNY is a huge success. From 2001 to 2009, 234 students

    have graduated rom the programme.

    Noom Wann

    testimony rom

    the book Candles

    in the Dark

    c Shan State ConstitutionDrafting Committee (SSCDC)

    Internship Programme

    EBO unded the Shan State Constitution

    Drating Committee (SSCDC) to provide an

    internship programme in constitutional law

    to young men and women rom Shan State.

    SSCDC has been running the internship

    programme since it was established in 2000.

    The priority is given to youth rom insideBurma, as due to the long drawn-out confict,

    the educational level o the ethnic communities

    is low. To bridge the educational gap, the

    SSCDC has provided internships to ethnic

    youth rom Burma in Chiang Mai. The school

    considers the personal development o the

    students o the utmost importance, however it

    is also the most dicult to substantiate.

    A crucial role o the SSCDC is to ensure an inclu-

    sive and participatory constitutional process in

    Shan State including as many communities as

    possible, and the interns play an important role

    in SCCDCs constitutional awareness-raising

    programmes. The SSCDC has played an im-

    portant role in coordinating and disseminating

    inormation to communities in Shan State on

    the drat versions o the Shan State constitu-

    tion. It also assists with the operations o all

    Shan state projects (political prisoners, youth

    capacity building trai ning, etc).

    EBO has also either hosted or acilitated

    internships and eposure visits or young

    Burmese change agents in Brussels and

    elsewhere.

    kEy achIEvEmEntS

    and challEnGES

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    33/52

    Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report 31

    Karen people used to have a Karen High School whichtaught in Karen until 1962. I personally learned my languageat home. But I did not learn how to read and write it. I couldonly speak and understand it. When I let the country andfed to Thailand, I started to study it because there wereschools in the reugee camps. But I elt very rustratedbecause there were only our books in Karen language. So,sometimes, I eel like what is the point o being a Kareni I am not allowed to speak, read or write my language?When I remember my riends who still live in Burma, I eel sosorry or them because I know they can only speak Karen

    but dont know how to write our language. Hence, they mixKaren with Burmese since theystudy Burmese language at schooland they do not consider Karen asan important language anymore.

    To strengthen civil society in Burma,

    publications and brieng documentsavailable in ethnic languages are

    etremely important. Investment in ethnic

    research and media enable the ethnic commu-

    nities to preserve their culture, to understand

    other communities, and to ensure that the

    cause o ethnic groups is not orgotten in a

    uture Burma and that they will be equal part-

    ners in a transition. They are also important

    or reporting human rights abuses, historic

    events and political, social and economic devel-

    opments in each state. EBO has supported the

    development and epansion o ethnic media

    organisations in all ethnic states.

    The development o national, independent,

    and ree media organisations in Burma is also

    o critical import ance and EBO has invested in

    the development o these since 1997.

    This ocus on ethnic media gives the possibility

    to preserve the language o each community.

    Many ethnic languages are orbidden to be

    taught in schools inside Burma:

    6 Support for mediaand information projects

    Lay Wah Pawa 25 year old

    Karen woman

    B y promoting the reporting o dierent

    issues (humanitarian, political, socio-economic...), EBOs goal is also to

    inorm policy makers, international institutions

    and neighbouring countries. In addition, EBO

    researchers provide in-depth brieng papers

    and analysis (available or consultation on the

    EBO website).

    EBO is also an information source

    and provides in-house research

    and analysis through:

    the EBO website (www.euro-burma.eu)and publications

    interviews and articles, which appearin international and Burmese media

    SHAN was ormed in 1991 and has been publishingthe Independence monthly since. Many Shan organisationsinside our State load our reports in Shan, make copies anddistribute them within their communities. As a result, a goodmany have become news addicts. Some people naturallywant to contribute, helping us to gain more news sources(during the Kokang campaign in August, we gained threehitherto unknown sources). This, in turn, has helped toproduce more and better reports not only in Shan, but alsoin English, Burmese and Thai. The EBO is the only underthat ocuses on non-Burmans. As such, it will continue to

    contribute to the peace and democracy building in Burma.Assisting non-Burmans and minoritiesmay not be quite popular but discardingthem will only encourage separatismand continued confict in Burma. TheEBO is certainly on the right track.

    KhuensaiEditor o Shan

    Herald Agency

    or News (SHAN )

    kEy achIEvEmEntS

    and challEnGES

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    34/52

    32 Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report

    EBO was very instrumental in strengtheningMizzimas capacity, especially when we were in need o ITsupport some years ago. The strength o the EBO is thatit knows the needs o a grassrootsorganisation and how it is importantand crucial or Burmas democrati-sation process.

    HISTORY SEMINARS

    E

    thnic research has been a high

    priority or the EBO as a tool to

    bolster the ethnic nationalities, sothat they will be able to rmly establish

    their place and role in the Burmese state

    and become equal participants. There

    has been special emphasis to support

    the development o ethnic historical

    research, with a ocus on eploring and

    documenting the diversity o Burmese

    ethnic history, while demonstrating

    unity through diversity. This has been

    accomplished by supporting individual

    researchers, projects ocusing on

    specic ethnic groups, as well as ethnic

    historical seminars.

    The rst historical seminar was on

    Arakan State and was an important rst

    step in the inclusion o Rohingya people

    in the ongoing reconciliation process.

    EBO also unded a Mon History Coner-

    ence in October 2007 at Chulalongkorn

    University, Thailand. It oered an occa-

    sion or Mon scholars to come together

    in order to discuss and share knowledge

    on the history o the Mon.

    From 13-15 October 2008, an EBO-und-

    ed international seminar on Eploring

    the history, culture and identity o the

    Chins was held in Aizawl, India. An

    array o issues were discussed rom eth-

    nicity, identity, linguistics and language,

    nomenclature and ethnonym, various

    aspects o Chin history and historical

    methods to ood and culinary practices,

    globalization, music, psychology, and -

    nally, agricultural and arming methods.

    These kinds o seminars are seen as

    landmarks or Chin people, who are try-

    ing to unite the diverse Chin communit y.

    It allowed dierent communities to be

    brought closer culturally, linguistically

    and politically. The aim is also to open

    up opportunities or uture ruitul co-

    operation between the two divided com-

    munities namely the Chins (in Burma)

    and the Mizos (in India). Seminars like

    this one benet signicantly the Chin

    struggle or reedom and democracy as

    well as the preparation or a democratic

    transition in Bur ma as a whole.

    Soe Myint

    Editor o Mizzima

    Book launch o the Chin Historical Seminar. Front row: Hi Phei (MP, Raja-Sabah, India), Harn Yawnghwe,Lian Uk (MP-elected 1990, Burma), Lal Thanhawla (Chie Minister o Mizoram, India), Dr. Lian Sakhong,Ngun Hre (ormer MP rom Burma) and Dr. Robin Khuly (Mizoram University).

    kEy achIEvEmEntS

    and challEnGES

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    35/52

    Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report 33

    One o the highlights o 2009 was the

    rst international conerence onShan Studies in Bangkok rom 15-17

    October, jointly organized by the Institute

    o Asian Studies (IAS), Chulalongkorn

    University and EBO. The conerence sought to

    bring together scholars o Shan Studies rom

    all over the world to share thei r knowledge and

    discoveries, as well as to meet and promote

    their co-operation.

    The conerence contributed greatly to the

    building up o the awareness and knowledge

    on various developments in Shan political

    and social history, arts, language, literature,perorming arts, religions and belies. The

    orum also served as a secure meeting place

    or participants rom Thailand and other

    parts o the world to create and strengthen

    collaboration, at national and international

    levels, on their research on political and social

    work in Shan State.

    In addition to the historical seminars,

    EBO has also employed Burmese returning

    epatriates to conduct general research on

    ethnic nationalities and to promote the concept

    o unity in diversity.

    The signicance o this book release is what weare celebrating; it is not just the result o an academicventure. This is a celebration o the brotherhood o thechildren o this homeland. The very purpose o this seminar

    is searching or our origins, our history, our identity, andour culture so that we will be ableto call ourselves, to declare our-selves, as brothers and sisters. Nomatter which side o internationalboundaries we happen to live, nomatter where we are, we are stillbrothers and sisters o the sameancestors and we are the childreno this homeland.

    Dr. Lian HSakhong

    Research Director o

    Euro-Burma Oce,

    on 16 November

    2009, Chin: History,

    Culture and Identity

    book release

    kEy achIEvEmEntS

    and challEnGES

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    36/52

    34 Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report

    The NationalReconciliation

    Programme

  • 8/9/2019 Euro Burma 10 Yr Report[1]

    37/52

    Euro-Burma Oce | Activity Report 35

    The National Reconciliation Programme (NRP) is a

    programme established in 1999 by the EBO withsupport rom the Burmese democracy movement,

    and Canadian Lutheran World Relie with unds rom

    the Peacebuilding Fund o the Canadian International

    Development Agency (CIDA). The NR P has also been unded

    by EBO, Danish Burm