Energy Systems and the Three Pillars of...
Transcript of Energy Systems and the Three Pillars of...
Energy Systems and the Three Pillars of Policy
• Structure of global energy use • Energy efficiency • … and clean energy generation sources • The Three Domains and Pillars of Policy• UK policy framework and progress
Michael GrubbProfessor of Energy and Climate Change
University College London
Nanjing University, July 2018
Neither security nor environment are easily ‘marketised’
Energy policy needs to address:
• Security• System resilience, over-concentration, geopolitical risk
• Access and Affordability• Fuel poverty, the disconnected, ‘industrial energy prices’
• Environment and sustainability • Air quality, climate change, mining and water
Prioritising one too much over the others generates instability Focus here particularly on electricity, increasingly important in other sectors (transport, buildings)A systems issue .. Requiring multiple policies
The ‘Energy Trilemma’..
Energy and emission flows within the fossil fuel system(a ‘simplified Sankey’ diagram)
Agriculture Landuse , other gases
Process emissio
ns
Emissions from
fuel extracti
on
Note: The next panel gives the numeric breakdown at each stage
5% Energy6% CO2
+Remaining 8% is unattributable
distribution losses
* Remaining 19% comes
from renewable sources
and nuclear
35% Energy30% CO2
Direct fuels: 28% Energy+
24% CO2
26 % Energy*42% CO2
+ methane leakage from mines
30 % Energy 36% Fossil fuel CO2
+ 4% Process CO2
Electricity:33 % Energy+
(on final output)41 % CO2
21 % Energy*20% CO2
+ CO2 from gas flaring+ methane leakage from distribution
30% Energy24% CO2
Refined fuels: 32% Energy+
35% CO2
34 % Energy*38% CO2
+ CO2 from flaring
All data from the International Energy
Agency, accessed through ESDS.
Numbers at each step in the Chart (fuel, channel, end-use) independently add to 100%.
50% by 2050
Global emissions reduction below 1990 level
1980
1990
2010
Combination needed for percentage emissions reductionPossible future paths
Historic average efficiency rate: 1.3%/yr
The energy challenge of decarbonisation > halving global CO2 emissions by mid Century and onwards to ‘net zero’
Global energy efficiency
Decarbonisation
A challenge of transformation
20% by 2030
Estimates of Global CO2 Mitigation Potential by 2030
Cost
$U
SD/t
onne
of C
O2e
(in
Mill
ions
)
Annual abatement in 2030 GtCO2e
Advanced Economies Emerging Asia Rest of the World
Smarter Choices
5 10 15 20 25
Choosing cleaner products and processes(Pillar II) Innovation and Infrastructure
(Pillar III)
Note. The Chart shows the “McKinsey curve” of estimated potential to cut global CO2 emissions by 2030, in terms of the cost of measures (vertical axis), and the scale of measures (horizontal axis). Only measures related to the energy sector are included. For details of some of the options represented by the individual bars see Chapter 4 (for the negative cost options), and Chapter 6 (for the central zone). See also notes 21-23.Source: Generated by the authors using source data from the McKinsey report, Parthways to a low carbon economy (2009).
The ‘cost curve’ indicating the ‘three realms of opportunity’
Energy Systems and the Three Pillars of Policy
• Structure of global energy use • Energy efficiency • … and clean energy generation sources • The Three Domains and Pillars of Policy• Growth theory and macroeconomic linkages• Policy Integration
Michael GrubbProfessor of Energy and Climate Change
University College London
Nanjing University, July 2018
5
10
Annual abatement in 2030 GtCO2e
Cost
$U
SD/t
onne
of C
O2e
Evidence confirms efficiency potential across individuals and organisations
Energy Systems and the Three Pillars of Policy
• Structure of global energy use • Energy efficiency • … and clean energy generation sources • The Three Domains and Pillars of Policy• Growth theory and macroeconomic linkages• Policy Integration
Michael GrubbProfessor of Energy and Climate Change
University College London
Nanjing University, July 2018
Zero carbon energy: Solar is the dominant global renewable energy resource Global Map of Solar Direct Normal Irradiation (kWh/m2/yr)Desert intensity 2-3 x mid-latitude (annual average)
Source: GEA, 2012: Global Energy Assessment - Toward a Sustainable Futurereproduced with permission from the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
Eg. 38 x 38 km - Area required to generate India’s electricity from solar sources (400 TWh) (15% conversion efficiency)
Driven mainly by public policy (internationally)
https://www.bloomberg.com/gadfly/articles/2016-11-23/solar-industry-makes-feast-of-price-famine http://reneweconomy.com.au/how-the-jaw-dropping-fall-in-solar-prices-will-change-energy-markets-55160/
http://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-ev-oil-crisis/http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-07-27/elon-musk-says-it-s-pencils-down-for-tesla-s-model-3
PV: New record installed power prices Chile = $30/MWh Masdar = $25/MWhAbu Dhabi = $24/MWh
Module costs: -29% in 2016 to $0.39/Watt
Huge fall in solar PV and battery costs
The wind resource is also huge – particularly in mid and high latitudes
Eg. wind energy is a huge resource for the UK, especially offshore
Source: Global Wind Energy Council
Capacity growth in wind and solar
Wind - global
PV - by region
Global cumulative installed PV capacity 2006–2016Over past ten years, x35; >35% avg annual growth
Global cumulative installed wind capacity 2001–2016Over past ten years, x5; >15% avg annual growth
Cf: Total Chinese generating capacity (mostly coal and hydro): 1500GW
Wind & solar costs now comparable to conventional energy sources
- .. Learning also documented across a wide range of other supply and demand-side technologies including w.r.t. energy efficiency
Energy Systems and the Three Pillars of Policy
• Structure of global energy use • Energy efficiency • … and clean energy generation sources • The Three Domains and Pillars of Policy• Growth theory and macroeconomic linkages• Policy Integration
Michael GrubbProfessor of Energy and Climate Change
University College London
Nanjing University, July 2018
PE Fig. 2 -3 b Resource trade-offs with the other two domains
Three Domains – an Economic Interpretation
Res
ourc
e U
se /
Ener
gy &
Em
issi
ons
Economic Output / Consumption
“Business as usual”
innovation
e.g. Accelerated, low carbon / resource-
efficient innovation
e.g. Purely carbon-
price-driven innovation
3rd Domain
1. Real-world individual and organisational decision-making
“Transforming” behaviour
“Optimising”behaviour
1st Domain“Satisficing”
behaviour
2nd Domain
3. Innovation & evolution of
complex systems
H
M
L
H Highest relevanceM Medium relevanceL Lowest relevance
Satisfice
Transform
Optimise
Domain Standards & Engagement
Markets & Prices
Strategic Investment
‘Smarter’individual & corporate choices
Cleaner products & processes
Innovation & infrastructure
1 2 3
L/M
H
L/M
L
M
H
Policy pillars
We need multiple policy instruments
Risk conception / Domain
Dominant scale Decision
frameworkField of theory
Mitigation economic
process
Realm of opportunity
Pillar of policy/
response
Ignore / Satisfice
Short term / local Indifferent or
disempoweredBehavioural & Organisational
Move closer to the ‘best
practice frontier’’
‘Smarter choices’
Standards and
engagement
(Pillar I)
Compensate/Optimise
Medium term / regional
Costs / impacts are tangible
and significant
Neoclassical & welfare
economics
Make best trade-offs along the frontier
Substitute cleaner
production & products
Markets and pricing
(Pillar II)
Secure/ Transform
Long term / global
Transformational risks and opportunities
Evolutionary & Institutional
Evolve the frontier
Innovation & infrastructure
Strategic investment
(Pillar III)
Planetary Economics Chapter 2 “The Three Domains”, Figure 2‑ 6 Alignments within each domain
A key to Planetary Economics – and politics – lies in the potential to align different levels of risk conception with the different pillars of response- A strategic risk issue like climate change aligns particularly with transformation
Global energy costs Annual
global emissions
Time‘Green’ futures
•Integrated high-innovation system•Biomass and electricity in transport•Low-carbon, ‘smart electricity’•High capital costs….•……but low operating costs
‘Brown’ futures• Continued dependence on fossil fuels• Unconventional and synthetic oil in transport• Low capital costs…•…but high operating costs and a host of environmental issues beyond carbon
Clustering of ‘low cost’ energy futures around higher and lower emissions, rather than in the middle, reflects
divergent responses to depletion of ‘easy oil’
We are here
Planetary Economics Chapter 10, “Transforming systems”, Figure 10-6: Two kinds of energy future – the carbon divide
“No wind favours those who don't know where they are going” - Lucius Annaeus Seneca
Need to steer not marginal+ but structural and systemic change
A sense of direction ….
Energy Systems and the Three Pillars of Policy
• Structure of global energy use • Energy efficiency • … and clean energy generation sources • The Three Domains and Pillars of Policy• UK policy framework and progress
Michael GrubbProfessor of Energy and Climate Change
University College London
Nanjing University, July 2018
2008 UK Climate Change Act- UK commitment to 80% reductions GHG emissions by 2050 (from 1990)
2006 emissions
International aviation & shipping*
UK non-CO2 GHGsOther CO2
Industry (heat & industrial processes)
Residential & Commercial heat
Domestic transport
Electricity Generation
* bunker fuels basis
2050 objective
159 Mt CO2e
695 Mt CO2e
77% cut (= 80% vs. 1990)
Emission reductions by sector
Source: Committee for Climate Change, 2017 Report to Parliament – Meeting Carbon Budgets: Closing the policy gap (2017); BEIS, Provisional GHG statistics for 2016 (2017); BEIS, Final GHG statistics for 1990-2015 (2017).
Transforming (3rd Domain)
Innovation & evolution of complex systems
Satisficing (1st Domain)
Diverse individual and organisational decision-making
Optimising (2nd Domain)
Idealised / ‘representative’ optimising behaviour
Economic Output / ConsumptionBehavioural and
organisational economicsNeoclassical and welfare
economicsEvolutionary and
institutional economics
Typical social and organisational scale
Typical timescale
Reso
urce
use
/ E
nerg
y &
Em
issi
ons
To summarise the broad economic framework ..
For a problem which spans:- the inattentive decision-making of
seven billion energy consumers- major markets in electricity, energy-
intensive industry, etc- The long-term transformation of
vast and complex infrastructure-based techno-economic systems
And in which historical gap between economic advice (price & markets) and effective policy (energy efficiency and technology / renewables etc)