Elearning Workshop at ENTER 2014
Click here to load reader
-
Upload
international-federation-for-information-technologies-in-travel-and-tourism-ifitt -
Category
Technology
-
view
54 -
download
1
Transcript of Elearning Workshop at ENTER 2014
![Page 1: Elearning Workshop at ENTER 2014](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100517/557c7d98d8b42a9f578b47de/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ENTER 2014 Research Track Slide Number 1
MOOCs’ pedagogy
• Elearning - MOOCs
• Collaborative learning
• Competencies
• Pros and cons.
![Page 2: Elearning Workshop at ENTER 2014](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100517/557c7d98d8b42a9f578b47de/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
ENTER 2014 Research Track Slide Number 2
MOOC PedagogyUOC vs MOOC Model (I)UOC mOOC
HE courses, mandatory, 14-16 weeks
Introductory course, voluntary, 6 weeks
Official tuition fees Free
Virtual Campus classroom, proprietary, “closed”
Wordpress + plugins (rating), open, manipulable
15-75 students per classroom, one teacher + additional support
500 preinscribed, no need to register, 1 organizer + 5 experts
Mostly textbooks, some open, a few videos and simulations
Some readings, “homemade” videos, BYOResources, OPEN
Continuous evaluation, proposed scheduling, teacher feedback
Mostly discussions, adaptive scheduling, partial feedback
Official accreditation No accreditation
![Page 3: Elearning Workshop at ENTER 2014](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100517/557c7d98d8b42a9f578b47de/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
ENTER 2014 Research Track Slide Number 3
Collaborative learning
• Social Identity Model
• new motivation to participate in SN
• Cognitive absorption is necessary
• How individual is captivated by ITC
• Beliefs and intention to use influence participation
![Page 4: Elearning Workshop at ENTER 2014](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100517/557c7d98d8b42a9f578b47de/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
ENTER 2014 Research Track Slide Number 4
Collaborative learning
• Social Cognitive Theory (Bandura)• Behaviour depends on
• influence of the system• personal conditions (expectancies, beliefs,..)
• Behaviour affects knowledge acquisition (learning)
• Personal conditions affected by emotions, self-efficacy
• Knowledge generation depends on social capital and social cognition
![Page 5: Elearning Workshop at ENTER 2014](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100517/557c7d98d8b42a9f578b47de/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
ENTER 2014 Research Track Slide Number 5
Collaborative learning
•Shared vision is important to exchange knowledge•Shared knowledge facilitates participation•Emotional identification
• Fosters intention to keep a stable relation• promotes loyalty• motivates knowledge exchange
•Fussion effects (cohesion) incentivates identification with the group
![Page 6: Elearning Workshop at ENTER 2014](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100517/557c7d98d8b42a9f578b47de/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
ENTER 2014 Research Track Slide Number 6
Improving competencies
Collaborative elearning includes the use and improvement of competencies related to a social and networked society
1.Adopt attitudes and behaviours according to ethics and responsibility2. Search, identify, organize and use appropriately the information3. Analyze, organize and plan the elearning activity4. Critical and synthetic analysis5. Team work and networked in multidisciplinary environment6. Negotiation7. Communicate correctly (written and oral) in the own language and in foreign language8. Use and apply ICT in the professional and academyc environment9. Entrepreneur and innovative behaviour
![Page 7: Elearning Workshop at ENTER 2014](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100517/557c7d98d8b42a9f578b47de/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
ENTER 2014 Research Track Slide Number 7
MOOCs as collaborative learning courses
Do MOOCs foster the acquisition and use of collaborative l competencies ?
Can MOOCs integrate these competencies?
Is it possible to practice these competencies in big massive environments as MOOCs?
![Page 8: Elearning Workshop at ENTER 2014](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100517/557c7d98d8b42a9f578b47de/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
ENTER 2014 Research Track Slide Number 8
MOOC PedagogyUOC vs MOOC Model (II)
The best of two worlds (improving UOC)
More videos (but not only videos)
More self-assessment + rapid feedback
More student participation (even as teachers) + P2P evaluation
More flexible scheduling (i.e. evaluation)
Some drawbacks
“Advanced compiler construction” cannot be massive!!!
Continuous evaluation (accreditation) needs tight dates if teacher feedback is provided, unless individualized