E.C. Simpson C. Ugalde M. Heil P.J. LeBlank R.J. DeBoer H. Costantini E. Uberseder

53
E.C. Simpson C. Ugalde M. Heil P.J. LeBlank R.J. DeBoer H. Costantini E. Uberseder R.E. Azuma C.R. Brune J. Goerres M.M. Wiescher “ In addition, the authors are indebted To Fred C. Barker and (ANU, Canberra) and Erich Vogt (Triumf, Vancouver) for many discussions and their help in the AZURE R-matrix project.”

description

E.C. Simpson C. Ugalde M. Heil P.J. LeBlank R.J. DeBoer H. Costantini E. Uberseder R.E. Azuma C.R. Brune J. Goerres M.M. Wiescher. “ In addition, the authors are indebted To Fred C. Barker and (ANU, Canberra) and Erich Vogt ( Triumf , Vancouver) for - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of E.C. Simpson C. Ugalde M. Heil P.J. LeBlank R.J. DeBoer H. Costantini E. Uberseder

Page 1: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

E.C. SimpsonC. UgaldeM. HeilP.J. LeBlankR.J. DeBoerH. CostantiniE. Uberseder

R.E. AzumaC.R. BruneJ. GoerresM.M. Wiescher

“ In addition, the authors are indebtedTo Fred C. Barker and (ANU, Canberra) and Erich Vogt (Triumf, Vancouver) for many discussions and their help in the AZURE R-matrix project.”

Page 2: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder
Page 3: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

Differential Cross SectionLane and Thomas, Eqns. 2.7 and 2.8, p. 292

where

Angle Integrated Cross section

Page 4: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder
Page 5: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder
Page 6: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder
Page 7: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder
Page 8: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder
Page 9: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

24°

Page 10: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

33°

Page 11: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

38.0

Page 12: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

43.9°

Page 13: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

48.9

Page 14: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

54°

Page 15: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

58.9°

Page 16: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

63.9°

Page 17: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

68.9°

Page 18: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

74.0°

Page 19: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

75.8°

Page 20: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

110.8100.8

90.880.8

Page 21: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

125.8120.8

115.8110.8

Page 22: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

165.8°150.8

140.8130.8

Page 23: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder
Page 24: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder
Page 25: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

Measurement of 16O Widths:Determination of 15N+p astrophysical reactions

All reactions and data sets analyzed simultaneously(Including radiative direct capture)

Reactions studied:

12C(α,α0)12C 12C(α,α1)12C 12C(α,p)15N 12C(α,γ)16O 15N(p,p0)15N 15N(p,α0)12C 15N(p,α1)12C 15N(p,γ)16O

Data Sets: (a,a0) (a,a1) (a,p0) (a,g)

Tischausser xMorris et al xFeng et al xMitchel et al xMitchel+Ophel xSchuerman et al x

(p,p0) (p0,a0) (p,a1) (p,g)Hagedorn xHagedorn+Marion xBashkin et al x xRedder et al xBray et al xLeBlank etal x

Page 26: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

Alpha Entrance-Channel Reactions

Above proton threshold12C(α,α0)12C

Page 27: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

167°136°

104°

71°

Page 28: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

165°

Page 29: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

6.6 MeV 6.99 MeV

7.4 MeV 7.7 MeV

Page 30: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

12c(α,α1)12C

Above proton threshold

Page 31: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

40°

90° 120°

Page 32: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

12C(α,γ)16O and 12C(α,p0)15N

Above proton threshold

Page 33: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

Total Cross section

Page 34: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

30° 40°

90° 120°

Page 35: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

Proton Entrance-Channel Reactions

Threshold Ex=12.127 MeV

Page 36: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

25°

105°

Page 37: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

0.888 MeV 1.038 MeV

1.163 MeV 1.238 MeV

Page 38: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

82°

159.9°

Page 39: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

90°

125°

160°

Page 40: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder
Page 41: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder
Page 42: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder
Page 43: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder
Page 44: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder
Page 45: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder
Page 46: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

16O(a,g)20Ne

Page 47: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder
Page 48: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder
Page 49: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder
Page 50: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder
Page 51: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

Graphical representation of the related uncertainty between two of the R-matrix fit parameters for the broad resonance at 2.5 MeV. Here the change in chi2 would be on the z-axis. Since the shape is elliptical this signifies that the two parameters have very little correlation. That is, the alpha and gamma widths for this resonance are good (not redundant) fit parameters.

Page 52: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder
Page 53: E.C. Simpson C.  Ugalde M.  Heil P.J.  LeBlank R.J.  DeBoer H.  Costantini E.  Uberseder

AZURE WEB SITE

HTTP://AZURE.ND.EDU