Developing Interventions for Change on Care with multiple Stakeholders Jane Remme, Thalia Kidder,...

29
Developing Interventions for Change on Care with multiple Stakeholders Jane Remme, Thalia Kidder, Maria Michalopoulou, Helina Alemarye 2 February 2015 WE-CARE

Transcript of Developing Interventions for Change on Care with multiple Stakeholders Jane Remme, Thalia Kidder,...

Developing Interventions for Change on Care with multiple Stakeholders

Jane Remme, Thalia Kidder, Maria Michalopoulou, Helina Alemarye 2 February 2015

WE-CARE

Page 2

While you are waiting1. Test your audio

• Tools > Audio > Audio set up Wizard

2. Close down any other applications E.g. Skype

3. Don’t use Internet Explorer. Use Chrome or other browser to launch and join Blackboard Collaborate.

4. Participating in the webinar:

• All questions and comments are welcome!

• Type comments/questions in the chat box at any time,

• To use microphone: signal, turn on, speak slowly, turn off.

• The webinar will be recorded and available for others afterwards

5. Any problems?• Let us know via the chat box• Email [email protected]

Page 3

Problems?

If you are having trouble hearing or being heard:

1. Close other applications on your computer (improves speed!)

2. Change your connection speedGo to Edit menu -> Preferences->Session, and then select ISDN,

wireless or other lower connection

3. Still having problems? Connect to session via phone• Call: 0044 207 819 3600• Participants code: 14800312#

Page 4

Your Questions:

If you have specific questions now that you would like answered in this webinar – please type them in!

Page 5

Some of the WE-Care team from Oxfam House

Thalia Kidder Jane Remme Helina Alemarye

Maria Michalopoulou

Page 6

Objectives of today’s Webinar

1) Improve joint understanding of a multi-stakeholder approach

2) Think through advantages and disadvantages of using a multi-stakeholder process

3) Clarify expectations for interventions in country

4) Explore three kinds interventions 1) Addressing Gender roles and attitudes towards care

2) Increasing access and use of time and labour saving equipment

3) Advocacy with state and private sector for infrastructure and services

Page 7

AGENDA

• A multi-stakeholder approach

• What does it look like?

• Disadvantages and advantages

• Examples

• Expectations for interventions

• 3 kinds of interventions

• Questions?

THE MULTI-STAKEHOLDER APPROACH

Page 9

A Multi-Stakeholder Approach

• Multi-stakeholder involvement is not a stand alone activity or event but rather an approach. Oxfam has a facilitating role in addressing heavy and unequal care together with other actors.

• “[a multi-stakeholder] process takes the view that everyone involved in the process has a valid view and relevant knowledge and experience to bring to decision-making. The approach aims to create trust between actors and solutions that create mutual benefits (win-win). The approach is people-centred and everyone involved takes responsibility for the outcome” UNFCCC

Scale upReviewTest / pilot

in small scale

MULTI-STAKEHOLDER

EVENTOne to One mtgs

with stakeholders

Friends & Allies meetingRCA

See what works

Reduce risks

Generate wider interest

Sensitise and develop common vision + commitment

Supports management of multi stakeholder process

Indentify key stakeholders

Sub groups planning in specific areas

• Prioritisation• Facilitation• Skills important• Ensure women participate• Ensure the voices of the community are included.

Household Care Survey

results

Oxfam + partners meeting

Friends & Allies meeting

Identify key problems and potential solutions

Feedback improving approach

Principles:1. Routed in evidence2. Multi stakeholder3. Testing / iterative approach4. Going to scale

Multi-Stakeholder Process

Page 11

YOUR VIEWS

• What are your doubts?

• What do you like about the approach?

• What are your questions?

Page 12

Your comments...

Page 13

WE-Care : a multi-stakeholder approach

• More sustainable in the medium and long-term, as many actors are committed to the success of the intervention

• More cost-effective, with contributions from various sources

• Better designed (more good ideas!)

• Communities will use and maintain resources better (rather than simply receiving donor-funded resources)

• It enables a ‘systems’ approach which aims to change the existing systems and structures (spreads innovation faster, changing power relationships, distributes responsibility and ownership)

WHAT DOES ‘MULTI-STAKEHOLDER’ LOOK LIKE IN PRACTICE?

Page 15

Examples

• TajWSS: The whole programme is multi-stakeholder

• WE-Care: Each intervention engages/involves more stakeholders:• Grain-grinding and water systems (Honduras): advocacy with

government achieved electricity-generating plant; producer union developed corn-grinding enterprise

• Promoting men as fathers – bring together radio stations, existing youth groups, schools/teachers, religious leaders (Promundo)

• Fuel-efficient stoves: clean-energy NGO to provide materials/videos to create demand; technical trainer (to make stoves); or stove company, Min of Agriculture subsidy, etc

Page 16

Your viewsAdvantages and disadvantages?

• Focus on examples presented or others you are thinking of

• Type your views in the chatbox

Page 17

Example from WE-Care: Intervention plan in Ethiopia Intervention planned in two different regions of Ethiopia,

Oromia and Somali region;

Intervention strategy is based on the findings identified from RCA’s conducted;

( Horticulture and Cross border Diary value chain projects) Horticulture project considered WE-care in the revision of

the project and included findings from the analysis with in the project proposal ;

Cross border diary value chain project is just in the planning stage thus the team used this opportune to incorporate RCA findings with in this project through recommendation of the gender analysis;

Funding (still a concern)

EXPECTATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS

Page 19

Clarity on expectations and desired outcomes

• Multi-stakeholder process is an approach and process (not an event or activity)

• Expect tangible outputs from the process, yes, and

• Expect the different actors will have a better understanding of the role they can play changing heavy and unequal care

• Different actors will understand why change will be beneficial

• Create a network of stakeholders that will engage on issues of unpaid care work – this can become a platform to solve more complex care issues

Page 20

What do you think?

In your context, how will you reach these desired outcomes?

Page 21

Three kinds of interventions

1. Gender roles and attitudes to care

2. Time and labour saving equipment

3. Advocacy to state and private sector for care related infrastructure, services and changing norms

Page 22

1 – Gender roles and attitudes• Identify the key attitudes or perceptions to be changed –and

the new attitude/perception or roles• Childcare and care of elderly is a valuable activity that brings joy into our

lives!

• Express what impact/outcome could occur from this change • Men take more responsibility for supervision, increasing women’s

mobility and choice over time

• Identify who/which actors could promote the new role –attitude?• Older men, a village leader, a music band teachers, radio station, health

promoters, religious leaders

• Who do we need to consult? Who could provide resources (including staff time or volunteer time)? Who will implement?

• How are you going to make this happen? • Community awareness-raising sessions, radio spots, role models,

change agents, etc…

Page 23

2 – Time and labour saving equipment

• What are the most problematic care tasks that can be addressed with time and labour saving equipment?• Fuel, water collection, meal preparation and stoves, electricity…

• Which are your priorities?

• What role do you think Oxfam should play and what role should others play? • Stakeholder mapping

• What impact do you want to have this year? What is the outcome?• Reduction of total hours of care work done by women, increased investment

in equipment by households• Information, access, use, delivery of time and labour saving equipment

• Who will do it/what?

Page 24

3 – Advocacy with policy-makers government, private-sector

• What is the change to be achieved? Policy/laws/resources etc

• (Gender) power analysis – who can make this decision, who are blockers and enablers,

• What are the existing plans/opportunities for lobbying and advocacy – in the host programme budget/work-plan, for a start – and with allies

• Who should deliver the message? (get partners, allies, private sector)

• What is the ‘best’ argument? Do we have the evidence?

Page 25

YOUR VIEWS• What are you planning for your 3 kinds of interventions?

• Have you planned them in a sequence? Which ones go first?

• Which interventions are more important for the context & why?

• Which interventions can use multi-stakeholder approaches? Why? how will this improve scale of impact, sustainability?

• What support or resources needed, if any?

Page 26

Your comments…

MORE QUESTIONS

Page 28

More Questions?

THANK YOU!

GOOD LUCK!