dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86...

of 808 /808
The University of Texas / Texas Tribune Poll Cross Tabulations The Texas Politics Project at The University of Texas at Austin in Conjunction with the Texas Tribune June 11, 2014

Embed Size (px)

Transcript of dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86...

Page 1: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

The University of Texas / Texas Tribune Poll Cross Tabulations

The Texas Politics Project at The University of Texas at Austin in Conjunction with the Texas Tribune

June 11, 2014

Page 2: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Contents

Political Habits 2Q2. Political Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2Q3. Voting Habit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

Texas Political Mood 25Q4. MIP Country . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25Q5. MIP State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61Q6. Obama Approval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98Q7. Congress Approval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110Q8. Rick Perry Approval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122Q9. Right Direction/Wrong Track, Country . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134Q10. National Economy: Better o↵/Worse O↵ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143Q11. Right Direction/Wrong Track, Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155Q12. Personal Economy: Better o↵/Worse o↵ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164

Elections 176Q13. 2014 Senate Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176Q14. 2014 Governor Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187Q15. 2014 Lieutenant Governor Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200Q16. 2014 Attorney General Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212Q17. 2014 Comptroller Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223Q18. 2014 Land Commissioner Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234Q19. 2014 Commissioner of Agriculture Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245Q20. 2014 Railroad Commission Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256Q21. 2014 Generic Texas Legislature Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 267Q22. Tea Party Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 276Q23. Tea Party Influence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 286Q25. 2016 Republican Presidential Primary Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 296Q26. 2016 Democratic Presidential Primary Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315

Political Figure Favorability Ratings 328Q27. Ted Cruz Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 328Q28. John Cornyn Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 340Q29. David Alameel Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 352

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

1

Page 3: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q30. Rick Perry Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 364Q31. Greg Abbott Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 376Q32. Wendy Davis Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 388Q33. Leticia Van de Putte Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 400Q34. Dan Patrick Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 412Q35A. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Public Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 424Q35B. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: The State Economy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 433Q35C. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Immigration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 442Q35D. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: The State Budget . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 451Q35E. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 460Q35F. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Ethics in Government . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 469Q35G. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Transportation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 478Q35H. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Higher Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 487

Policy Questions 496Q36A. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Creating a School Voucher Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 496Q36B. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Expanding the Number of Charter Schools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 507Q36C. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Increasing the Pay of Public School Teachers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 518Q36D. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Increasing Funding for the Public School System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 529Q36E. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Providing more incentives for individuals to choose teaching as a profession . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 540Q36F. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Reducing the number of standardized tests students must take . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 551Q36G. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Increasing opportunities for online learning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 562Q36H. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Establishing a state-wide pre-kindergarten program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 573Q36I. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Allowing more localized control over curriculum and standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 584Q37. MOST E↵ective Education Policy Proposal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 595Q38. Perceived Existence of Gender Gap in Pay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 610Q39. State’s Role in Addressing Gender Equality in the Workplace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 620Q40. Death Penalty Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 630Q41. Death Penalty Alternative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 641Q42. Life Sustaining Treatment for Pregnant Women . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 650Q43. A↵ordable Care Act Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 658Q44. A↵ordable Care Act Preference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 670Q45. In-State Tuition for Illegal Immigrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 681Q46A. Agree/Disagree: Most immigrants pay their fair share of taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 690Q46B. Agree/Disagree: We should restrict and control people coming to live in the U.S. more than we do now . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 701Q46C. Agree/Disagree: Newcomers from other countries enrich Texas with their hard work and values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 712

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

2

Page 4: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q46D. Agree/Disagree: Undocumented immigrants currently living in the United States should be deported immediately . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 723Q47A. Abortion Exceptions: The woman’s own health is seriously endangered . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 734Q47B. Abortion Exceptions: She became pregnant as a result of rape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 743Q47C. Abortion Exceptions: She became pregnant as a result of incest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 752Q47D. Abortion Exceptions: There is a strong chance of a serious defect in the baby . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 761Q47E. Abortion Exceptions: The family has very low income and cannot a↵ord any more children . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 770Q47F. Abortion Exceptions: She is not married and does not want to marry the man . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 779Q47G. Abortion Exceptions: She is married and does not want any more children . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 788Q48. College Education and Success . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 797

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

3

Page 5: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Political Habits

Q2. Political Interest

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 51 51 47 130 60 150 156 645

82.26 49.04 48.45 36.01 48.39 64.66 71.23-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 9 35 37 152 53 69 46 401

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

4

Page 6: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

14.52 33.65 38.14 42.11 42.74 29.74 21.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 1 14 12 41 8 11 11 98

1.61 13.46 12.37 11.36 6.45 4.74 5.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 1 4 1 34 3 2 4 49

1.61 3.85 1.03 9.42 2.42 0.86 1.83-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 6

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.11 0.00 0.00 0.91-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 104 97 361 124 232 219 1199

5.17 8.67 8.09 30.11 10.34 19.35 18.27===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 149 130 366 645

56.87 36.01 63.87---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 81 152 167 400

30.92 42.11 29.14---------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 27 41 29 97

10.31 11.36 5.06---------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 5 34 9 48

1.91 9.42 1.57---------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

5

Page 7: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 0 4 2 60.00 1.11 0.35

---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 361 573 1196

21.91 30.18 47.91=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 145 33 66 34 89 57 201 625

56.64 29.20 55.46 30.09 73.55 46.34 67.45------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 85 60 39 46 24 44 82 380

33.20 53.10 32.77 40.71 19.83 35.77 27.52------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 12 12 11 27 7 13 12 94

4.69 10.62 9.24 23.89 5.79 10.57 4.03------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 12 7 3 5 1 9 2 39

4.69 6.19 2.52 4.42 0.83 7.32 0.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 5

0.78 0.88 0.00 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 113 119 113 121 123 298 1143

22.40 9.89 10.41 9.89 10.59 10.76 26.07================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

6

Page 8: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 244 34 348 626

49.80 30.09 64.09-----------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 184 46 149 379

37.55 40.71 27.44-----------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 36 27 32 95

7.35 23.89 5.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 23 5 12 40

4.69 4.42 2.21-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 1 2 6

0.61 0.88 0.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 490 113 543 1146

42.76 9.86 47.38=======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

7

Page 9: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Extremely interested 122 250 204 71 64750.62 54.95 76.69 29.83

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 83 165 57 95 400

34.44 36.26 21.43 39.92---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 28 26 4 41 99

11.62 5.71 1.50 17.23---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 8 11 1 27 47

3.32 2.42 0.38 11.34---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 3 0 4 7

0.00 0.66 0.00 1.68---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 455 266 238 1200

20.08 37.92 22.17 19.83===============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 18 136 179 63 167 84 647

43.90 38.53 53.92 55.26 67.61 73.68----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 10 158 110 42 58 23 401

24.39 44.76 33.13 36.84 23.48 20.18----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 4 38 32 5 17 3 99

9.76 10.76 9.64 4.39 6.88 2.63

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

8

Page 10: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 7 20 8 4 4 4 47

17.07 5.67 2.41 3.51 1.62 3.51----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 2 1 3 0 1 0 7

4.88 0.28 0.90 0.00 0.40 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 353 332 114 247 114 1201

3.41 29.39 27.64 9.49 20.57 9.49==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 112 141 66 151 172 642

59.57 53.21 50.00 53.55 52.28-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 56 85 49 105 105 400

29.79 32.08 37.12 37.23 31.91-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 10 25 11 20 33 99

5.32 9.43 8.33 7.09 10.03-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 9 13 4 5 18 49

4.79 4.91 3.03 1.77 5.47-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 1 1 2 1 1 6

0.53 0.38 1.52 0.35 0.30-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 265 132 282 329 1196

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

9

Page 11: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

15.72 22.16 11.04 23.58 27.51=========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 439 62 111 13 2 8 11 646

61.14 40.00 40.66 59.09 50.00 61.54 78.57------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 206 69 108 9 1 4 3 400

28.69 44.52 39.56 40.91 25.00 30.77 21.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 52 12 34 0 0 1 0 99

7.24 7.74 12.45 0.00 0.00 7.69 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 17 10 19 0 1 0 0 47

2.37 6.45 6.96 0.00 25.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 7

0.56 1.29 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 155 273 22 4 13 14 1199

59.88 12.93 22.77 1.83 0.33 1.08 1.17==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

10

Page 12: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 378 12 79 30 125 22 646

58.15 50.00 51.97 46.15 49.02 38.60---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 201 9 53 27 90 22 402

30.92 37.50 34.87 41.54 35.29 38.60---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 46 1 12 6 23 11 99

7.08 4.17 7.89 9.23 9.02 19.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 21 2 8 2 14 2 49

3.23 8.33 5.26 3.08 5.49 3.51---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 0 0 0 3 0 7

0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.18 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 650 24 152 65 255 57 1203

54.03 2.00 12.64 5.40 21.20 4.74=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------Extremely interested 347 300 647

61.74 46.95-----------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 176 225 401

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

11

Page 13: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

31.32 35.21-----------------------------------------------Not very interested 22 76 98

3.91 11.89-----------------------------------------------Not at all interested 14 34 48

2.49 5.32-----------------------------------------------Don't know 3 4 7

0.53 0.63-----------------------------------------------Total 562 639 1201

46.79 53.21===============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 188 334 122 644

52.51 56.51 49.19---------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 124 184 92 400

34.64 31.13 37.10---------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 23 54 22 99

6.42 9.14 8.87---------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 20 17 11 48

5.59 2.88 4.44---------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

12

Page 14: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 3 2 1 60.84 0.34 0.40

---------------------------------------------------------Total 358 591 248 1197

29.91 49.37 20.72=========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 136 212 61 62 175 646

54.18 57.45 50.00 57.94 49.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 93 108 50 29 121 401

37.05 29.27 40.98 27.10 34.47----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 16 33 5 9 35 98

6.37 8.94 4.10 8.41 9.97----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 5 14 6 7 16 48

1.99 3.79 4.92 6.54 4.56----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 1 2 0 0 4 7

0.40 0.54 0.00 0.00 1.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 369 122 107 351 1200

20.92 30.75 10.17 8.92 29.25============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

13

Page 15: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 91 143 285 128 647

45.96 45.54 61.82 56.39--------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 73 110 137 80 400

36.87 35.03 29.72 35.24--------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 21 42 21 14 98

10.61 13.38 4.56 6.17--------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 11 17 16 5 49

5.56 5.41 3.47 2.20--------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 2 2 2 0 6

1.01 0.64 0.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 461 227 1200

16.50 26.17 38.42 18.92==============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

14

Page 16: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q3. Voting Habit

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 28 25 21 60 30 93 97 354

45.16 24.04 21.88 16.62 24.19 40.26 44.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 27 47 47 144 48 104 81 498

43.55 45.19 48.96 39.89 38.71 45.02 37.33-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

15

Page 17: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

About half 3 15 11 48 23 17 18 1354.84 14.42 11.46 13.30 18.55 7.36 8.29

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 3 8 11 61 13 13 10 119

4.84 7.69 11.46 16.90 10.48 5.63 4.61-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 1 9 6 42 10 3 8 79

1.61 8.65 6.25 11.63 8.06 1.30 3.69-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 0 0 6 0 1 3 10

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.66 0.00 0.43 1.38-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 104 96 361 124 231 217 1195

5.19 8.70 8.03 30.21 10.38 19.33 18.16===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 73 60 219 352

27.97 16.62 38.35---------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 121 144 233 498

46.36 39.89 40.81---------------------------------------------------------------------About half 29 48 58 135

11.11 13.30 10.16---------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 22 61 36 119

8.43 16.90 6.30

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

16

Page 18: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------None 16 42 21 79

6.13 11.63 3.68---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 6 4 10

0.00 1.66 0.70---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 361 571 1193

21.88 30.26 47.86=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 88 16 19 18 44 36 123 344

34.65 14.16 15.83 15.93 36.67 29.03 41.55------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 108 42 59 44 56 43 130 482

42.52 37.17 49.17 38.94 46.67 34.68 43.92------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About half 26 18 20 15 10 18 23 130

10.24 15.93 16.67 13.27 8.33 14.52 7.77------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 20 28 10 19 7 17 11 112

7.87 24.78 8.33 16.81 5.83 13.71 3.72------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 9 9 11 15 2 9 9 64

3.54 7.96 9.17 13.27 1.67 7.26 3.04------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 0 1 2 1 1 0 8

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

17

Page 19: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.18 0.00 0.83 1.77 0.83 0.81 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 113 120 113 120 124 296 1140

22.28 9.91 10.53 9.91 10.53 10.88 25.96================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 123 18 203 344

25.31 15.93 37.38-----------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 210 44 230 484

43.21 38.94 42.36-----------------------------------------------------------------------About half 64 15 52 131

13.17 13.27 9.58-----------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 57 19 35 111

11.73 16.81 6.45-----------------------------------------------------------------------None 28 15 21 64

5.76 13.27 3.87-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 2 2 8

0.82 1.77 0.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 113 543 1142

42.56 9.89 47.55=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

18

Page 20: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 82 116 115 39 352

34.17 25.61 43.07 16.32---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 92 206 116 86 500

38.33 45.47 43.45 35.98---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About half 30 60 17 29 136

12.50 13.25 6.37 12.13---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 20 51 15 35 121

8.33 11.26 5.62 14.64---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 16 17 3 44 80

6.67 3.75 1.12 18.41---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 3 1 6 10

0.00 0.66 0.37 2.51---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 453 267 239 1199

20.02 37.78 22.27 19.93===============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

19

Page 21: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 5 88 90 35 89 45 352

12.50 25.00 27.19 31.25 36.03 39.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 18 133 142 42 115 49 499

45.00 37.78 42.90 37.50 46.56 42.61----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About half 4 45 38 17 21 10 135

10.00 12.78 11.48 15.18 8.50 8.70----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 4 43 37 13 16 8 121

10.00 12.22 11.18 11.61 6.48 6.96----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 8 41 18 5 4 3 79

20.00 11.65 5.44 4.46 1.62 2.61----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 1 2 6 0 2 0 11

2.50 0.57 1.81 0.00 0.81 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 352 331 112 247 115 1197

3.34 29.41 27.65 9.36 20.63 9.61==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

20

Page 22: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Every election 70 94 40 64 84 35237.43 35.61 30.30 22.86 25.69

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 70 118 53 122 132 495

37.43 44.70 40.15 43.57 40.37-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About half 18 21 20 42 34 135

9.63 7.95 15.15 15.00 10.40-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 19 14 15 31 41 120

10.16 5.30 11.36 11.07 12.54-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 10 16 3 19 31 79

5.35 6.06 2.27 6.79 9.48-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 1 1 2 5 9

0.00 0.38 0.76 0.71 1.53-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 264 132 280 327 1190

15.71 22.18 11.09 23.53 27.48=========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 233 39 61 3 3 4 10 353

32.50 25.49 22.43 13.64 75.00 28.57 71.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 319 60 96 15 0 6 4 500

44.49 39.22 35.29 68.18 0.00 42.86 28.57

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

21

Page 23: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About half 74 19 37 3 0 1 0 134

10.32 12.42 13.60 13.64 0.00 7.14 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 57 20 40 1 0 2 0 120

7.95 13.07 14.71 4.55 0.00 14.29 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 27 12 38 0 1 1 0 79

3.77 7.84 13.97 0.00 25.00 7.14 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 10

0.98 1.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 717 153 272 22 4 14 14 1196

59.95 12.79 22.74 1.84 0.33 1.17 1.17==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 213 2 30 22 77 8 352

32.82 8.33 19.87 33.85 30.43 13.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 281 11 69 33 84 22 500

43.30 45.83 45.70 50.77 33.20 37.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About half 71 1 20 4 34 7 137

10.94 4.17 13.25 6.15 13.44 12.07---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 52 8 21 3 27 10 121

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

22

Page 24: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

8.01 33.33 13.91 4.62 10.67 17.24---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 29 1 10 3 27 10 80

4.47 4.17 6.62 4.62 10.67 17.24---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 1 1 0 4 1 10

0.46 4.17 0.66 0.00 1.58 1.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 649 24 151 65 253 58 1200

54.08 2.00 12.58 5.42 21.08 4.83=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------Every election 192 161 353

34.22 25.31-----------------------------------------------Almost every election 244 255 499

43.49 40.09-----------------------------------------------About half 57 79 136

10.16 12.42-----------------------------------------------One or two 37 83 120

6.60 13.05-----------------------------------------------None 25 54 79

4.46 8.49-----------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

23

Page 25: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 6 4 101.07 0.63

-----------------------------------------------Total 561 636 1197

46.87 53.13===============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------Every election 98 176 79 353

27.37 29.98 31.85---------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 145 254 99 498

40.50 43.27 39.92---------------------------------------------------------About half 41 67 27 135

11.45 11.41 10.89---------------------------------------------------------One or two 45 50 25 120

12.57 8.52 10.08---------------------------------------------------------None 25 36 16 77

6.98 6.13 6.45---------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 4 2 10

1.12 0.68 0.81---------------------------------------------------------Total 358 587 248 1193

30.01 49.20 20.79

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

24

Page 26: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=========================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 76 101 39 40 97 353

30.28 27.45 31.97 37.04 27.71----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 122 148 47 39 143 499

48.61 40.22 38.52 36.11 40.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About half 20 52 10 8 46 136

7.97 14.13 8.20 7.41 13.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 24 35 13 13 36 121

9.56 9.51 10.66 12.04 10.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 9 29 13 8 21 80

3.59 7.88 10.66 7.41 6.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 3 0 0 7 10

0.00 0.82 0.00 0.00 2.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 368 122 108 350 1199

20.93 30.69 10.18 9.01 29.19============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

25

Page 27: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------Every election 42 81 137 93 353

21.32 25.80 29.72 41.15--------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 70 110 216 103 499

35.53 35.03 46.85 45.58--------------------------------------------------------------About half 25 44 57 11 137

12.69 14.01 12.36 4.87--------------------------------------------------------------One or two 29 44 35 12 120

14.72 14.01 7.59 5.31--------------------------------------------------------------None 27 31 14 7 79

13.71 9.87 3.04 3.10--------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 4 2 0 10

2.03 1.27 0.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------Total 197 314 461 226 1198

16.44 26.21 38.48 18.86==============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

26

Page 28: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Texas Political Mood

Q4. MIP Country

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 10 17 12 77 24 33 37 210

15.87 15.89 12.50 21.45 19.67 14.29 17.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 0 3 5 31 25 53 50 167

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

27

Page 29: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 2.80 5.21 8.64 20.49 22.94 23.15--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadershi 3 5 11 32 25 41 41 158

4.76 4.67 11.46 8.91 20.49 17.75 18.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 7 9 8 44 3 11 4 86

11.11 8.41 8.33 12.26 2.46 4.76 1.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 2 6 6 32 3 7 10 66

3.17 5.61 6.25 8.91 2.46 3.03 4.63--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 6 14 11 11 2 2 0 46

9.52 13.08 11.46 3.06 1.64 0.87 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 10 21 20 11 5 0 0 67

15.87 19.63 20.83 3.06 4.10 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 1 0 0 15 9 24 22 71

1.59 0.00 0.00 4.18 7.38 10.39 10.19--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 0 5 7 6 2 3 1 24

0.00 4.67 7.29 1.67 1.64 1.30 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 1 0 2 11 1 8 1 24

1.59 0.00 2.08 3.06 0.82 3.46 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 1 5 0 6 9 9 9 39

1.59 4.67 0.00 1.67 7.38 3.90 4.17--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 0 0 0 12 3 4 4 23

0.00 0.00 0.00 3.34 2.46 1.73 1.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 2 3 5 12 1 10 1 34

3.17 2.80 5.21 3.34 0.82 4.33 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 4

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

28

Page 30: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 0.93 2.08 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 5 2 0 5 0 7 4 23

7.94 1.87 0.00 1.39 0.00 3.03 1.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 9 6 2 6 0 0 1 24

14.29 5.61 2.08 1.67 0.00 0.00 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 4

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.43 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2

1.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 2 0 0 2 0 8 15 27

3.17 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.00 3.46 6.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 0 4 4 12 2 0 0 22

0.00 3.74 4.17 3.34 1.64 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 5

1.59 0.93 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 0 1 0 11 4 4 4 24

0.00 0.93 0.00 3.06 3.28 1.73 1.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 0 1 1 14 3 3 6 28

0.00 0.93 1.04 3.90 2.46 1.30 2.78--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 0 0 0 3 1 2 4 10

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.84 0.82 0.87 1.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2

1.59 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

29

Page 31: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

1.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3

0.00 2.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 107 96 359 122 231 216 1194

5.28 8.96 8.04 30.07 10.22 19.35 18.09============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 39 77 94 210

14.77 21.45 16.52---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 8 31 127 166

3.03 8.64 22.32---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 19 32 107 158

7.20 8.91 18.80---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 24 44 18 86

9.09 12.26 3.16---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 13 32 20 65

4.92 8.91 3.51---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

30

Page 32: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Partisan gridlock 30 11 3 4411.36 3.06 0.53

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 51 11 5 67

19.32 3.06 0.88---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 1 15 56 72

0.38 4.18 9.84---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 12 6 6 24

4.55 1.67 1.05---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 3 11 10 24

1.14 3.06 1.76---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 6 6 28 40

2.27 1.67 4.92---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 0 12 12 24

0.00 3.34 2.11---------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 9 12 12 33

3.41 3.34 2.11---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 3 1 0 4

1.14 0.28 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 7 5 11 23

2.65 1.39 1.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 17 6 1 24

6.44 1.67 0.18---------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 2 2 4

0.00 0.56 0.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

31

Page 33: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Housing 1 0 1 20.38 0.00 0.18

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 2 2 23 27

0.76 0.56 4.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 9 12 2 23

3.41 3.34 0.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 2 2 1 5

0.76 0.56 0.18---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 1 11 12 24

0.38 3.06 2.11---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 2 14 11 27

0.76 3.90 1.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 0 3 7 10

0.00 0.84 1.23---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 1 1 0 2

0.38 0.28 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 1 0 0 1

0.38 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 3 0 0 3

1.14 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 264 359 569 1192

22.15 30.12 47.73=================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

32

Page 34: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 45 13 19 25 19 25 54 200

17.58 11.40 15.97 22.12 15.70 20.16 18.18------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 10 4 4 17 31 25 66 157

3.91 3.51 3.36 15.04 25.62 20.16 22.22------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 10 7 23 16 29 20 54 159

3.91 6.14 19.33 14.16 23.97 16.13 18.18------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 36 10 6 12 4 7 10 85

14.06 8.77 5.04 10.62 3.31 5.65 3.37------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 15 10 6 4 2 9 12 58

5.86 8.77 5.04 3.54 1.65 7.26 4.04------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 14 10 13 3 0 2 2 44

5.47 8.77 10.92 2.65 0.00 1.61 0.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 35 12 15 2 1 1 0 66

13.67 10.53 12.61 1.77 0.83 0.81 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 3 6 2 4 13 7 34 69

1.17 5.26 1.68 3.54 10.74 5.65 11.45------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 8 7 3 0 0 3 2 23

3.12 6.14 2.52 0.00 0.00 2.42 0.67

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

33

Page 35: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 4 3 2 3 2 3 5 22

1.56 2.63 1.68 2.65 1.65 2.42 1.68------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 7 4 1 3 8 6 9 38

2.73 3.51 0.84 2.65 6.61 4.84 3.03------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 4 3 0 2 2 4 7 22

1.56 2.63 0.00 1.77 1.65 3.23 2.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 8 4 4 5 3 2 7 33

3.12 3.51 3.36 4.42 2.48 1.61 2.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 4

0.00 0.88 1.68 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 9 2 1 5 1 2 4 24

3.52 1.75 0.84 4.42 0.83 1.61 1.35------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 11 1 6 4 1 0 0 23

4.30 0.88 5.04 3.54 0.83 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 5

0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.83 1.61 0.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2

0.39 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 0 1 2 1 3 1 18 26

0.00 0.88 1.68 0.88 2.48 0.81 6.06------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 14 4 3 0 0 0 0 21

5.47 3.51 2.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 6

0.78 0.88 1.68 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

34

Page 36: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 4 5 5 1 0 3 6 24

1.56 4.39 4.20 0.88 0.00 2.42 2.02------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 9 4 0 2 1 0 3 19

3.52 3.51 0.00 1.77 0.83 0.00 1.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 0 0 2 0 2 3 8

0.39 0.00 0.00 1.77 0.00 1.61 1.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2

0.39 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3

1.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 114 119 113 121 124 297 1144

22.38 9.97 10.40 9.88 10.58 10.84 25.96============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 76 25 98 199

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

35

Page 37: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

15.57 22.12 18.15-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 18 17 122 157

3.69 15.04 22.59-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 40 16 103 159

8.20 14.16 19.07-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 51 12 20 83

10.45 10.62 3.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 31 4 23 58

6.35 3.54 4.26-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 37 3 3 43

7.58 2.65 0.56-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 62 2 2 66

12.70 1.77 0.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 11 4 54 69

2.25 3.54 10.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 18 0 5 23

3.69 0.00 0.93-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 10 3 9 22

2.05 2.65 1.67-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 12 3 23 38

2.46 2.65 4.26-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 7 2 14 23

1.43 1.77 2.59-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 16 5 12 33

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

36

Page 38: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

3.28 4.42 2.22-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 3 1 0 4

0.61 0.88 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 11 5 6 22

2.25 4.42 1.11-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 18 4 1 23

3.69 3.54 0.19-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 1 0 4 5

0.20 0.00 0.74-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 2 0 0 2

0.41 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 4 1 23 28

0.82 0.88 4.26-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 22 0 0 22

4.51 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 4 1 0 5

0.82 0.88 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 14 1 9 24

2.87 0.88 1.67-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 13 2 4 19

2.66 1.77 0.74-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 2 5 8

0.20 1.77 0.93-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 2 0 0 2

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

37

Page 39: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.41 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 1 0 0 1

0.20 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 3 0 0 3

0.61 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 113 540 1141

42.77 9.90 47.33===================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 55 68 43 44 210

22.82 15.08 16.23 18.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 49 13 71 32 165

20.33 2.88 26.79 13.62---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 24 40 66 30 160

9.96 8.87 24.91 12.77---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 10 48 5 23 86

4.15 10.64 1.89 9.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

38

Page 40: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Health care 14 38 5 8 655.81 8.43 1.89 3.40

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 3 38 0 4 45

1.24 8.43 0.00 1.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 1 61 0 4 66

0.41 13.53 0.00 1.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 12 7 24 28 71

4.98 1.55 9.06 11.91---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 6 17 0 1 24

2.49 3.77 0.00 0.43---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 5 8 5 5 23

2.07 1.77 1.89 2.13---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 10 9 12 8 39

4.15 2.00 4.53 3.40---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 8 6 6 5 25

3.32 1.33 2.26 2.13---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 8 16 4 5 33

3.32 3.55 1.51 2.13---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 1 2 0 1 4

0.41 0.44 0.00 0.43---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 9 9 2 4 24

3.73 2.00 0.75 1.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 0 17 3 3 23

0.00 3.77 1.13 1.28---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

39

Page 41: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

The media 3 0 1 1 51.24 0.00 0.38 0.43

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 2 0 0 2

0.00 0.44 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 8 3 12 4 27

3.32 0.67 4.53 1.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 0 20 0 3 23

0.00 4.43 0.00 1.28---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 1 4 0 0 5

0.41 0.89 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 7 8 2 7 24

2.90 1.77 0.75 2.98---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 5 11 0 10 26

2.07 2.44 0.00 4.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 2 1 4 4 11

0.83 0.22 1.51 1.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 0 1 0 1 2

0.00 0.22 0.00 0.43---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 0 1 0 0 1

0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 3 0 0 3

0.00 0.67 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

40

Page 42: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Total 241 451 265 235 119220.22 37.84 22.23 19.71

===========================================================================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 3 63 66 19 42 17 210

6.98 17.80 20.31 16.52 16.94 14.78----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 4 52 48 16 27 19 166

9.30 14.69 14.77 13.91 10.89 16.52----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 6 48 37 15 32 22 160

13.95 13.56 11.38 13.04 12.90 19.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 3 30 23 4 15 11 86

6.98 8.47 7.08 3.48 6.05 9.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 3 21 20 7 13 0 64

6.98 5.93 6.15 6.09 5.24 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 1 6 14 6 8 11 46

2.33 1.69 4.31 5.22 3.23 9.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 0 9 16 3 29 9 66

0.00 2.54 4.92 2.61 11.69 7.83----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 2 18 22 4 20 5 71

4.65 5.08 6.77 3.48 8.06 4.35

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

41

Page 43: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 0 4 7 3 7 3 24

0.00 1.13 2.15 2.61 2.82 2.61----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 1 10 3 0 6 4 24

2.33 2.82 0.92 0.00 2.42 3.48----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 2 13 6 7 11 1 40

4.65 3.67 1.85 6.09 4.44 0.87----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 2 3 7 0 8 5 25

4.65 0.85 2.15 0.00 3.23 4.35----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 0 15 15 4 0 0 34

0.00 4.24 4.62 3.48 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 1 1 0 0 2 0 4

2.33 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 0 12 6 4 2 0 24

0.00 3.39 1.85 3.48 0.81 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 0 5 5 4 5 5 24

0.00 1.41 1.54 3.48 2.02 4.35----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 1 2 0 2 0 5

0.00 0.28 0.62 0.00 0.81 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 0 0 1 0 0 2

2.33 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 2 10 6 6 3 1 28

4.65 2.82 1.85 5.22 1.21 0.87----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 4 7 3 4 5 0 23

9.30 1.98 0.92 3.48 2.02 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

42

Page 44: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 0 0 2 2 1 0 5

0.00 0.00 0.62 1.74 0.40 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 2 11 7 3 1 0 24

4.65 3.11 2.15 2.61 0.40 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 3 12 7 2 3 1 28

6.98 3.39 2.15 1.74 1.21 0.87----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 3 2 1 1 4 0 11

6.98 0.56 0.31 0.87 1.61 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 0 1 1 0 0 0 2

0.00 0.28 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 0 1 0 1 1 3

0.00 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.40 0.87----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 43 354 325 115 248 115 1200

3.58 29.50 27.08 9.58 20.67 9.58======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================attend

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

43

Page 45: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 30 40 22 58 55 205

16.39 15.15 16.67 20.64 16.77-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 34 40 19 37 36 166

18.58 15.15 14.39 13.17 10.98-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 20 34 18 36 52 160

10.93 12.88 13.64 12.81 15.85-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 5 26 7 26 24 88

2.73 9.85 5.30 9.25 7.32-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 4 12 14 17 18 65

2.19 4.55 10.61 6.05 5.49-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 1 3 3 20 19 46

0.55 1.14 2.27 7.12 5.79-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 4 7 7 21 28 67

2.19 2.65 5.30 7.47 8.54-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 30 20 10 4 7 71

16.39 7.58 7.58 1.42 2.13-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 5 0 4 7 8 24

2.73 0.00 3.03 2.49 2.44-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 2 12 1 6 3 24

1.09 4.55 0.76 2.14 0.91-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 8 9 3 9 9 38

4.37 3.41 2.27 3.20 2.74-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 2 7 3 2 9 23

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

44

Page 46: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.09 2.65 2.27 0.71 2.74-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 6 8 6 4 9 33

3.28 3.03 4.55 1.42 2.74-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 0 1 0 2 1 4

0.00 0.38 0.00 0.71 0.30-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 5 10 1 1 6 23

2.73 3.79 0.76 0.36 1.83-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 1 5 0 3 14 23

0.55 1.89 0.00 1.07 4.27-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 2 2 0 1 5

0.00 0.76 1.52 0.00 0.30-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 1 0 1 0 2

0.00 0.38 0.00 0.36 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 6 7 0 5 9 27

3.28 2.65 0.00 1.78 2.74-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 2 3 5 7 6 23

1.09 1.14 3.79 2.49 1.83-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 2 1 0 1 1 5

1.09 0.38 0.00 0.36 0.30-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 5 5 3 5 5 23

2.73 1.89 2.27 1.78 1.52-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 5 8 4 8 2 27

2.73 3.03 3.03 2.85 0.61-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 6 3 0 1 0 10

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

45

Page 47: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

3.28 1.14 0.00 0.36 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 0 0 0 0 2 2

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 0 0 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 0 0 0 3 3

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 183 264 132 281 328 1188

15.40 22.22 11.11 23.65 27.61=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA ge Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 111 30 61 1 0 5 1 209

15.50 19.74 22.43 4.55 0.00 41.67 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 115 8 34 2 2 1 3 165

16.06 5.26 12.50 9.09 66.67 8.33 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 119 8 23 3 0 3 5 161

16.62 5.26 8.46 13.64 0.00 25.00 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

46

Page 48: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Unemployment/jobs 36 20 19 8 0 0 3 865.03 13.16 6.99 36.36 0.00 0.00 21.43

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 31 14 19 0 0 1 0 65

4.33 9.21 6.99 0.00 0.00 8.33 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 33 3 7 2 0 0 0 45

4.61 1.97 2.57 9.09 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 42 5 19 1 0 0 0 67

5.87 3.29 6.99 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 53 6 10 0 0 0 1 70

7.40 3.95 3.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 10 6 7 1 0 0 0 24

1.40 3.95 2.57 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 14 2 7 0 0 0 0 23

1.96 1.32 2.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 24 7 7 1 0 1 0 40

3.35 4.61 2.57 4.55 0.00 8.33 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 14 6 5 0 0 0 0 25

1.96 3.95 1.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 16 4 13 0 0 0 0 33

2.23 2.63 4.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 4

0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.33 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 11 6 5 0 1 0 0 23

1.54 3.95 1.84 0.00 33.33 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

47

Page 49: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Environment 16 0 8 0 0 0 0 242.23 0.00 2.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 5

0.56 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2

0.00 0.66 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 24 0 3 0 0 0 0 27

3.35 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 11 8 4 0 0 0 0 23

1.54 5.26 1.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 5

0.14 1.32 0.37 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 12 5 6 0 0 0 0 23

1.68 3.29 2.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 4 9 12 1 0 0 0 26

0.56 5.92 4.41 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 8 1 0 0 0 0 1 10

1.12 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2

0.00 0.66 0.00 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

48

Page 50: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Voting system 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 716 152 272 22 3 12 14 1191

60.12 12.76 22.84 1.85 0.25 1.01 1.18============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 112 3 24 10 45 16 210

17.36 13.64 15.79 14.71 17.86 27.59---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 103 6 19 9 28 1 166

15.97 27.27 12.50 13.24 11.11 1.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 86 3 25 8 33 3 158

13.33 13.64 16.45 11.76 13.10 5.17---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 38 1 5 9 26 8 87

5.89 4.55 3.29 13.24 10.32 13.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 38 1 10 1 13 3 66

5.89 4.55 6.58 1.47 5.16 5.17---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 22 0 11 2 8 2 45

3.41 0.00 7.24 2.94 3.17 3.45---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 28 0 14 3 14 7 66

4.34 0.00 9.21 4.41 5.56 12.07

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

49

Page 51: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 43 0 6 7 9 6 71

6.67 0.00 3.95 10.29 3.57 10.34---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 12 1 3 0 8 1 25

1.86 4.55 1.97 0.00 3.17 1.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 18 1 1 1 3 0 24

2.79 4.55 0.66 1.47 1.19 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 26 1 3 5 4 1 40

4.03 4.55 1.97 7.35 1.59 1.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 14 2 0 0 4 4 24

2.17 9.09 0.00 0.00 1.59 6.90---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 15 1 3 2 11 2 34

2.33 4.55 1.97 2.94 4.37 3.45---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 1 0 0 1 2 0 4

0.16 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.79 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 3 1 7 1 10 2 24

0.47 4.55 4.61 1.47 3.97 3.45---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 13 0 4 0 6 0 23

2.02 0.00 2.63 0.00 2.38 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 3 0 0 0 1 0 4

0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 0 0 1 0 1 2

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.00 1.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 22 0 3 3 0 0 28

3.41 0.00 1.97 4.41 0.00 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

50

Page 52: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 10 0 7 1 4 0 22

1.55 0.00 4.61 1.47 1.59 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 3 0 2 0 0 0 5

0.47 0.00 1.32 0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 7 0 5 2 9 1 24

1.09 0.00 3.29 2.94 3.57 1.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 18 0 0 1 9 0 28

2.79 0.00 0.00 1.47 3.57 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 6 1 0 1 3 0 11

0.93 4.55 0.00 1.47 1.19 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 2 0 0 0 0 0 2

0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 2 0 0 0 1 0 3

0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 645 22 152 68 252 58 1197

53.88 1.84 12.70 5.68 21.05 4.85=====================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

51

Page 53: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

===========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------------------The economy 97 113 210

17.38 17.80-----------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 90 76 166

16.13 11.97-----------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 76 84 160

13.62 13.23-----------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 40 46 86

7.17 7.24-----------------------------------------------------------Health care 23 42 65

4.12 6.61-----------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 22 23 45

3.94 3.62-----------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 36 31 67

6.45 4.88-----------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 31 40 71

5.56 6.30-----------------------------------------------------------Education 7 18 25

1.25 2.83-----------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 7 16 23

1.25 2.52-----------------------------------------------------------Immigration 18 21 39

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

52

Page 54: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

3.23 3.31-----------------------------------------------------------Taxes 11 13 24

1.97 2.05-----------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 13 21 34

2.33 3.31-----------------------------------------------------------Energy 3 1 4

0.54 0.16-----------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 17 6 23

3.05 0.94-----------------------------------------------------------Environment 11 13 24

1.97 2.05-----------------------------------------------------------The media 3 2 5

0.54 0.31-----------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 2 2

0.00 0.31-----------------------------------------------------------Border security 16 11 27

2.87 1.73-----------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 7 15 22

1.25 2.36-----------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 3 1 4

0.54 0.16-----------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 11 13 24

1.97 2.05-----------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 10 17 27

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

53

Page 55: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.79 2.68-----------------------------------------------------------Abortion 4 6 10

0.72 0.94-----------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 1 1 2

0.18 0.16-----------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0

0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 1 0 1

0.18 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 3 3

0.00 0.47-----------------------------------------------------------Total 558 635 1193

46.77 53.23===========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 65 112 33 210

18.21 19.02 13.20---------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 42 87 36 165

11.76 14.77 14.40---------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

54

Page 56: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Political corruption/leadership 38 80 42 16010.64 13.58 16.80

---------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 24 51 12 87

6.72 8.66 4.80---------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 28 22 15 65

7.84 3.74 6.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 15 28 2 45

4.20 4.75 0.80---------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 28 34 4 66

7.84 5.77 1.60---------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 17 27 27 71

4.76 4.58 10.80---------------------------------------------------------------------Education 6 16 3 25

1.68 2.72 1.20---------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 4 11 9 24

1.12 1.87 3.60---------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 9 12 19 40

2.52 2.04 7.60---------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 5 17 3 25

1.40 2.89 1.20---------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 12 13 8 33

3.36 2.21 3.20---------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 3 1 0 4

0.84 0.17 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

55

Page 57: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Gay marriage 9 9 5 232.52 1.53 2.00

---------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 7 14 2 23

1.96 2.38 0.80---------------------------------------------------------------------The media 1 3 1 5

0.28 0.51 0.40---------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 2 0 0 2

0.56 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 3 15 9 27

0.84 2.55 3.60---------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 10 8 5 23

2.80 1.36 2.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 3 1 1 5

0.84 0.17 0.40---------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 11 8 5 24

3.08 1.36 2.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 9 13 5 27

2.52 2.21 2.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 2 5 4 11

0.56 0.85 1.60---------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 1 1 0 2

0.28 0.17 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

56

Page 58: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Foreign trade 0 1 0 10.00 0.17 0.00

---------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 3 0 0 3

0.84 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 589 250 1196

29.85 49.25 20.90=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 44 60 25 16 65 210

17.46 16.35 21.01 14.95 18.68----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 38 49 19 10 50 166

15.08 13.35 15.97 9.35 14.37----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 33 43 14 16 53 159

13.10 11.72 11.76 14.95 15.23----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 19 31 7 8 22 87

7.54 8.45 5.88 7.48 6.32----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 16 16 8 7 19 66

6.35 4.36 6.72 6.54 5.46----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 15 14 4 9 4 46

5.95 3.81 3.36 8.41 1.15

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

57

Page 59: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 14 24 5 11 12 66

5.56 6.54 4.20 10.28 3.45----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 10 17 4 2 38 71

3.97 4.63 3.36 1.87 10.92----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 6 11 0 2 5 24

2.38 3.00 0.00 1.87 1.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 5 7 2 0 9 23

1.98 1.91 1.68 0.00 2.59----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 7 12 3 8 10 40

2.78 3.27 2.52 7.48 2.87----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 10 6 1 0 7 24

3.97 1.63 0.84 0.00 2.01----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 4 10 6 0 14 34

1.59 2.72 5.04 0.00 4.02----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 1 0 1 0 2 4

0.40 0.00 0.84 0.00 0.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 2 11 1 3 5 22

0.79 3.00 0.84 2.80 1.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 6 8 1 6 1 22

2.38 2.18 0.84 5.61 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 3 1 0 1 5

0.00 0.82 0.84 0.00 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 0 0 1 1 2

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.93 0.29

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

58

Page 60: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 5 11 5 0 6 27

1.98 3.00 4.20 0.00 1.72----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 4 5 3 4 7 23

1.59 1.36 2.52 3.74 2.01----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 0 2 1 0 2 5

0.00 0.54 0.84 0.00 0.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 7 8 4 2 3 24

2.78 2.18 3.36 1.87 0.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 5 14 3 0 5 27

1.98 3.81 2.52 0.00 1.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 3 0 1 5 10

0.40 0.82 0.00 0.93 1.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 0 1 1 0 0 2

0.00 0.27 0.84 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 0 0 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 1 0 1 1 3

0.00 0.27 0.00 0.93 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 252 367 119 107 348 1193

21.12 30.76 9.97 8.97 29.17========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

59

Page 61: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 36 71 78 25 210

18.85 22.68 16.88 10.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 13 38 68 47 166

6.81 12.14 14.72 20.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 14 40 66 40 160

7.33 12.78 14.29 17.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 18 20 35 14 87

9.42 6.39 7.58 6.09--------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 11 23 22 9 65

5.76 7.35 4.76 3.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 3 9 27 7 46

1.57 2.88 5.84 3.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 12 16 30 8 66

6.28 5.11 6.49 3.48--------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 12 17 24 19 72

6.28 5.43 5.19 8.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 6 10 9 0 25

3.14 3.19 1.95 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 3 4 7 9 23

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

60

Page 62: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.57 1.28 1.52 3.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 5 6 17 12 40

2.62 1.92 3.68 5.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 4 13 7 0 24

2.09 4.15 1.52 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 9 6 10 8 33

4.71 1.92 2.16 3.48--------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 0 2 0 2 4

0.00 0.64 0.00 0.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 12 7 4 0 23

6.28 2.24 0.87 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 5 6 7 6 24

2.62 1.92 1.52 2.61--------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 2 0 2 1 5

1.05 0.00 0.43 0.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 0 2 0 2

0.00 0.00 0.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 3 4 11 9 27

1.57 1.28 2.38 3.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 1 3 13 5 22

0.52 0.96 2.81 2.17--------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 0 2 2 0 4

0.00 0.64 0.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 8 6 8 2 24

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

61

Page 63: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

4.19 1.92 1.73 0.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 9 9 6 3 27

4.71 2.88 1.30 1.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 4 1 3 2 10

2.09 0.32 0.65 0.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 1 0 1 0 2

0.52 0.00 0.22 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 0 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 0 3 1 4

0.00 0.00 0.65 0.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 191 313 462 230 1196

15.97 26.17 38.63 19.23==========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

62

Page 64: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q5. MIP State

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 3 5 5 39 25 61 42 180

4.69 4.90 5.10 10.92 20.66 26.64 19.27--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 3 2 1 21 19 58 72 176

4.69 1.96 1.02 5.88 15.70 25.33 33.03--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

63

Page 65: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Unemployment/jobs 6 2 10 43 3 13 8 859.38 1.96 10.20 12.04 2.48 5.68 3.67

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadershi 13 30 30 34 4 4 3 118

20.31 29.41 30.61 9.52 3.31 1.75 1.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 4 13 10 19 5 6 3 60

6.25 12.75 10.20 5.32 4.13 2.62 1.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 3 10 2 25 13 10 2 65

4.69 9.80 2.04 7.00 10.74 4.37 0.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 5 14 2 25 2 4 4 56

7.81 13.73 2.04 7.00 1.65 1.75 1.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 7 3 8 30 16 17 11 92

10.94 2.94 8.16 8.40 13.22 7.42 5.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 2 4 1 19 4 4 3 37

3.12 3.92 1.02 5.32 3.31 1.75 1.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 1 0 0 6 1 12 21 41

1.56 0.00 0.00 1.68 0.83 5.24 9.63--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 1 3 1 7 2 9 7 30

1.56 2.94 1.02 1.96 1.65 3.93 3.21--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 1 5 4 4 2 0 0 16

1.56 4.90 4.08 1.12 1.65 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 3 1 1 14 3 0 0 22

4.69 0.98 1.02 3.92 2.48 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 0 1 5 16 6 4 11 43

0.00 0.98 5.10 4.48 4.96 1.75 5.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

64

Page 66: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

State government spending 0 0 2 12 3 2 3 220.00 0.00 2.04 3.36 2.48 0.87 1.38

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 0 1 0 7 2 8 2 20

0.00 0.98 0.00 1.96 1.65 3.49 0.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 0 3 0 4 1 0 3 11

0.00 2.94 0.00 1.12 0.83 0.00 1.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 2 0 0 0 2 2 1 7

3.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.65 0.87 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 6 1 5 3 1 0 3 19

9.38 0.98 5.10 0.84 0.83 0.00 1.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 0 0 2 12 4 4 3 25

0.00 0.00 2.04 3.36 3.31 1.75 1.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 3

0.00 0.00 1.02 0.00 0.83 0.00 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 3

0.00 0.00 1.02 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 5

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 1.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 1 3 1 1 0 0 6

0.00 0.98 3.06 0.28 0.83 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 0 1 0 1 0 4 9 15

0.00 0.98 0.00 0.28 0.00 1.75 4.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 4 2 3 6 0 2 0 17

6.25 1.96 3.06 1.68 0.00 0.87 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

65

Page 67: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

The media 0 0 1 2 0 3 1 70.00 0.00 1.02 0.56 0.00 1.31 0.46

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 0 0 0 5 1 1 0 7

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.40 0.83 0.44 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 64 102 98 357 121 229 218 1189

5.38 8.58 8.24 30.03 10.18 19.26 18.33============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 13 39 129 181

4.96 10.92 22.67---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 6 21 149 176

2.29 5.88 26.19---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 18 43 25 86

6.87 12.04 4.39---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 73 34 11 118

27.86 9.52 1.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 27 19 15 61

10.31 5.32 2.64

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

66

Page 68: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 14 25 25 64

5.34 7.00 4.39---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 22 25 9 56

8.40 7.00 1.58---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 18 30 45 93

6.87 8.40 7.91---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 7 19 11 37

2.67 5.32 1.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 1 6 33 40

0.38 1.68 5.80---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 5 7 18 30

1.91 1.96 3.16---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 9 4 2 15

3.44 1.12 0.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 4 14 3 21

1.53 3.92 0.53---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 5 16 21 42

1.91 4.48 3.69---------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 2 12 9 23

0.76 3.36 1.58---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 2 7 11 20

0.76 1.96 1.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 3 4 4 11

1.15 1.12 0.70

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

67

Page 69: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 2 0 5 7

0.76 0.00 0.88---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 12 3 4 19

4.58 0.84 0.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 2 12 10 24

0.76 3.36 1.76---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 0 2 3

0.38 0.00 0.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 1 1 3

0.38 0.28 0.18---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 0 1 4 5

0.00 0.28 0.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 4 1 1 6

1.53 0.28 0.18---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 1 1 13 15

0.38 0.28 2.28---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 9 6 2 17

3.44 1.68 0.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 1 2 4 7

0.38 0.56 0.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.18---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 0 5 2 7

0.00 1.40 0.35

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

68

Page 70: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 357 569 1188

22.05 30.05 47.90=================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 11 13 7 16 39 25 65 176

4.33 11.40 5.83 14.16 31.97 20.49 21.81------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 7 3 3 14 39 24 84 174

2.76 2.63 2.50 12.39 31.97 19.67 28.19------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 37 11 4 10 2 5 10 79

14.57 9.65 3.33 8.85 1.64 4.10 3.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 34 15 49 5 7 2 2 114

13.39 13.16 40.83 4.42 5.74 1.64 0.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 22 10 7 4 2 8 7 60

8.66 8.77 5.83 3.54 1.64 6.56 2.35------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 11 5 7 8 2 13 13 59

4.33 4.39 5.83 7.08 1.64 10.66 4.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 29 7 4 6 3 2 3 54

11.42 6.14 3.33 5.31 2.46 1.64 1.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 12 9 13 14 14 12 17 91

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

69

Page 71: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

4.72 7.89 10.83 12.39 11.48 9.84 5.70------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 7 11 5 2 1 4 3 33

2.76 9.65 4.17 1.77 0.82 3.28 1.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 1 1 0 4 5 0 26 37

0.39 0.88 0.00 3.54 4.10 0.00 8.72------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 6 6 3 1 1 2 10 29

2.36 5.26 2.50 0.88 0.82 1.64 3.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 8 3 2 1 1 0 0 15

3.15 2.63 1.67 0.88 0.82 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 8 1 4 6 0 1 0 20

3.15 0.88 3.33 5.31 0.00 0.82 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 14 4 2 2 3 1 10 36

5.51 3.51 1.67 1.77 2.46 0.82 3.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 6 2 1 3 0 7 4 23

2.36 1.75 0.83 2.65 0.00 5.74 1.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 3 2 1 3 1 6 5 21

1.18 1.75 0.83 2.65 0.82 4.92 1.68------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 3 1 1 1 1 0 4 11

1.18 0.88 0.83 0.88 0.82 0.00 1.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 2 0 2 0 0 0 3 7

0.79 0.00 1.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 11 1 4 2 0 1 0 19

4.33 0.88 3.33 1.77 0.00 0.82 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 4 1 0 6 1 5 6 23

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

70

Page 72: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.57 0.88 0.00 5.31 0.82 4.10 2.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 4

0.39 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 3

0.00 0.00 0.83 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 5

0.39 0.00 0.00 0.88 0.00 0.00 1.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 6

1.57 0.88 0.00 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 3 0 0 0 0 0 11 14

1.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.69------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 7 5 0 1 0 2 2 17

2.76 4.39 0.00 0.88 0.00 1.64 0.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 7

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.64 1.68------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 5

0.79 0.88 0.00 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 114 120 113 122 122 298 1143

22.22 9.97 10.50 9.89 10.67 10.67 26.07============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

71

Page 73: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 30 16 129 175

6.19 14.16 23.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 12 14 146 172

2.47 12.39 27.04-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 51 10 17 78

10.52 8.85 3.15-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 98 5 11 114

20.21 4.42 2.04-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 39 4 17 60

8.04 3.54 3.15-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 23 8 28 59

4.74 7.08 5.19-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 40 6 8 54

8.25 5.31 1.48-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 34 14 43 91

7.01 12.39 7.96-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 23 2 7 32

4.74 1.77 1.30-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 3 4 31 38

0.62 3.54 5.74-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

72

Page 74: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Social welfare programs 15 1 12 283.09 0.88 2.22

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 13 1 1 15

2.68 0.88 0.19-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 13 6 1 20

2.68 5.31 0.19-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 20 2 14 36

4.12 1.77 2.59-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 9 3 11 23

1.86 2.65 2.04-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 5 3 12 20

1.03 2.65 2.22-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 4 1 5 10

0.82 0.88 0.93-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 4 0 3 7

0.82 0.00 0.56-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 17 2 1 20

3.51 1.77 0.19-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 5 6 13 24

1.03 5.31 2.41-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 2 0 2 4

0.41 0.00 0.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 1 1 3

0.21 0.88 0.19-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

73

Page 75: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Insurance rates 1 1 3 50.21 0.88 0.56

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 5 1 0 6

1.03 0.88 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 3 0 11 14

0.62 0.00 2.04-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 11 1 4 16

2.27 0.88 0.74-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 0 6 6

0.00 0.00 1.11-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.19-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 4 1 2 7

0.82 0.88 0.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 485 113 540 1138

42.62 9.93 47.45===================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 42 26 84 30 182

17.50 5.74 31.34 13.10

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

74

Page 76: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 35 11 86 44 176

14.58 2.43 32.09 19.21---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 21 43 3 19 86

8.75 9.49 1.12 8.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 1 100 7 10 118

0.42 22.08 2.61 4.37---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 8 42 7 4 61

3.33 9.27 2.61 1.75---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 20 22 5 18 65

8.33 4.86 1.87 7.86---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 6 38 1 11 56

2.50 8.39 0.37 4.80---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 20 33 22 19 94

8.33 7.28 8.21 8.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 5 17 2 13 37

2.08 3.75 0.75 5.68---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 9 2 13 16 40

3.75 0.44 4.85 6.99---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 8 13 2 7 30

3.33 2.87 0.75 3.06---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 1 13 0 2 16

0.42 2.87 0.00 0.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 4 14 0 3 21

1.67 3.09 0.00 1.31

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

75

Page 77: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 12 13 6 10 41

5.00 2.87 2.24 4.37---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 5 11 6 2 24

2.08 2.43 2.24 0.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 6 3 8 2 19

2.50 0.66 2.99 0.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 4 4 1 2 11

1.67 0.88 0.37 0.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 1 2 2 2 7

0.42 0.44 0.75 0.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 0 16 1 2 19

0.00 3.53 0.37 0.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 10 6 6 2 24

4.17 1.32 2.24 0.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 1 0 1 3

0.42 0.22 0.00 0.44---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 1 0 1 3

0.42 0.22 0.00 0.44---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 3 1 0 1 5

1.25 0.22 0.00 0.44---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 6 0 0 6

0.00 1.32 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 9 2 4 1 16

3.75 0.44 1.49 0.44

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

76

Page 78: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 2 9 0 6 17

0.83 1.99 0.00 2.62---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 5 0 1 0 6

2.08 0.00 0.37 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 1 0 1

0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 1 4 0 1 6

0.42 0.88 0.00 0.44---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 453 268 229 1190

20.17 38.07 22.52 19.24===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 5 53 48 15 42 19 182

12.50 15.06 14.68 13.16 17.14 16.81----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 7 58 47 18 33 13 176

17.50 16.48 14.37 15.79 13.47 11.50----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 3 39 19 12 9 4 86

7.50 11.08 5.81 10.53 3.67 3.54----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 2 25 36 9 34 13 119

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

77

Page 79: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

5.00 7.10 11.01 7.89 13.88 11.50----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 1 9 15 4 19 12 60

2.50 2.56 4.59 3.51 7.76 10.62----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 1 22 24 4 10 4 65

2.50 6.25 7.34 3.51 4.08 3.54----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 0 16 21 6 9 3 55

0.00 4.55 6.42 5.26 3.67 2.65----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 5 21 22 11 22 12 93

12.50 5.97 6.73 9.65 8.98 10.62----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 2 11 14 3 7 0 37

5.00 3.12 4.28 2.63 2.86 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 1 14 7 2 10 6 40

2.50 3.98 2.14 1.75 4.08 5.31----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 1 15 8 5 1 0 30

2.50 4.26 2.45 4.39 0.41 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 1 1 0 1 7 6 16

2.50 0.28 0.00 0.88 2.86 5.31----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 0 5 2 3 5 6 21

0.00 1.42 0.61 2.63 2.04 5.31----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 4 16 13 3 4 1 41

10.00 4.55 3.98 2.63 1.63 0.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 4 7 10 0 2 1 24

10.00 1.99 3.06 0.00 0.82 0.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 0 6 6 5 2 0 19

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

78

Page 80: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 1.70 1.83 4.39 0.82 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 2 3 4 1 1 0 11

5.00 0.85 1.22 0.88 0.41 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 0 0 3 0 2 2 7

0.00 0.00 0.92 0.00 0.82 1.77----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 1 2 3 3 8 3 20

2.50 0.57 0.92 2.63 3.27 2.65----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 0 8 6 3 4 4 25

0.00 2.27 1.83 2.63 1.63 3.54----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 0 1 2 0 0 1 4

0.00 0.28 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 1 2 0 0 0 3

0.00 0.28 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 0 3 1 0 1 0 5

0.00 0.85 0.31 0.00 0.41 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 0 2 1 1 1 5

0.00 0.00 0.61 0.88 0.41 0.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 0 8 2 0 5 1 16

0.00 2.27 0.61 0.00 2.04 0.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 0 5 3 2 5 1 16

0.00 1.42 0.92 1.75 2.04 0.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 1 4 0 2 0 7

0.00 0.28 1.22 0.00 0.82 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

79

Page 81: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 0 1 3 3 0 0 7

0.00 0.28 0.92 2.63 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 352 327 114 245 113 1191

3.36 29.55 27.46 9.57 20.57 9.49======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 24 52 21 41 41 179

13.04 19.62 15.79 14.64 12.54-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 30 51 16 42 37 176

16.30 19.25 12.03 15.00 11.31-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 8 20 10 29 20 87

4.35 7.55 7.52 10.36 6.12-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 10 7 9 42 50 118

5.43 2.64 6.77 15.00 15.29-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 4 17 8 17 15 61

2.17 6.42 6.02 6.07 4.59-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 10 7 7 20 21 65

5.43 2.64 5.26 7.14 6.42-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

80

Page 82: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Health care 6 16 5 9 20 563.26 6.04 3.76 3.21 6.12

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 13 23 2 26 29 93

7.07 8.68 1.50 9.29 8.87-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 8 11 5 7 7 38

4.35 4.15 3.76 2.50 2.14-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 21 7 4 4 4 40

11.41 2.64 3.01 1.43 1.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 9 6 5 2 8 30

4.89 2.26 3.76 0.71 2.45-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 2 2 4 2 6 16

1.09 0.75 3.01 0.71 1.83-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 5 1 3 3 9 21

2.72 0.38 2.26 1.07 2.75-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 11 13 6 8 4 42

5.98 4.91 4.51 2.86 1.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 3 6 5 6 4 24

1.63 2.26 3.76 2.14 1.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 1 6 4 1 8 20

0.54 2.26 3.01 0.36 2.45-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 3 1 0 1 4 9

1.63 0.38 0.00 0.36 1.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 0 1 2 2 3 8

0.00 0.38 1.50 0.71 0.92-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

81

Page 83: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Environment 1 2 1 3 12 190.54 0.75 0.75 1.07 3.67

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 4 4 5 3 8 24

2.17 1.51 3.76 1.07 2.45-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 1 0 1 0 3

0.54 0.38 0.00 0.36 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 0 0 0 2 3

0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 1 1 0 3 0 5

0.54 0.38 0.00 1.07 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 2 1 2 1 6

0.00 0.75 0.75 0.71 0.31-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 4 6 2 1 2 15

2.17 2.26 1.50 0.36 0.61-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 2 2 1 4 8 17

1.09 0.75 0.75 1.43 2.45-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 0 5 1 1 7

0.00 0.00 3.76 0.36 0.31-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 1 0 0 1

0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 2 0 1 0 3 6

1.09 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.92-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 184 265 133 280 327 1189

15.48 22.29 11.19 23.55 27.50=====================================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

82

Page 84: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA ge Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 125 13 29 7 1 4 3 182

17.53 8.44 10.82 31.82 25.00 30.77 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 144 4 21 0 2 1 5 177

20.20 2.60 7.84 0.00 50.00 7.69 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 22 33 25 7 0 0 0 87

3.09 21.43 9.33 31.82 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 69 15 26 3 0 2 3 118

9.68 9.74 9.70 13.64 0.00 15.38 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 34 4 20 1 0 1 0 60

4.77 2.60 7.46 4.55 0.00 7.69 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 29 9 25 1 0 0 0 64

4.07 5.84 9.33 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 27 17 12 0 0 0 0 56

3.79 11.04 4.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 70 8 13 1 0 1 1 94

9.82 5.19 4.85 4.55 0.00 7.69 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 14 5 15 1 0 2 0 37

1.96 3.25 5.60 4.55 0.00 15.38 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

83

Page 85: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 32 2 3 0 0 0 2 39

4.49 1.30 1.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 11 4 15 0 0 0 0 30

1.54 2.60 5.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 10 2 3 0 0 1 0 16

1.40 1.30 1.12 0.00 0.00 7.69 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 11 6 4 0 0 0 0 21

1.54 3.90 1.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 13 9 17 1 0 1 0 41

1.82 5.84 6.34 4.55 0.00 7.69 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 9 3 11 0 0 0 0 23

1.26 1.95 4.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 14 5 1 0 0 0 0 20

1.96 3.25 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 6 1 2 0 1 0 0 10

0.84 0.65 0.75 0.00 25.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 8

0.84 1.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 16 2 1 0 0 0 0 19

2.24 1.30 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 11 0 12 0 0 0 0 23

1.54 0.00 4.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 4

0.28 0.65 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

84

Page 86: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 4

0.00 0.65 1.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 7

0.42 1.30 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 15

2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 7 4 6 0 0 0 0 17

0.98 2.60 2.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 6

0.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 7

0.56 1.30 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 713 154 268 22 4 13 14 1188

60.02 12.96 22.56 1.85 0.34 1.09 1.18============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

85

Page 87: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 117 3 23 8 21 9 181

18.28 13.04 15.44 12.12 8.40 15.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 106 2 15 19 28 5 175

16.56 8.70 10.07 28.79 11.20 8.77---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 31 3 9 2 38 4 87

4.84 13.04 6.04 3.03 15.20 7.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 45 1 34 5 24 8 117

7.03 4.35 22.82 7.58 9.60 14.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 32 0 10 5 10 3 60

5.00 0.00 6.71 7.58 4.00 5.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 32 3 3 3 14 9 64

5.00 13.04 2.01 4.55 5.60 15.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 26 1 9 4 13 3 56

4.06 4.35 6.04 6.06 5.20 5.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 55 3 4 3 25 3 93

8.59 13.04 2.68 4.55 10.00 5.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 20 1 7 3 4 4 39

3.12 4.35 4.70 4.55 1.60 7.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 29 0 6 2 3 0 40

4.53 0.00 4.03 3.03 1.20 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 16 0 3 2 8 0 29

2.50 0.00 2.01 3.03 3.20 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 8 0 2 0 5 0 15

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

86

Page 88: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.25 0.00 1.34 0.00 2.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 14 0 3 0 4 0 21

2.19 0.00 2.01 0.00 1.60 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 21 3 5 1 12 0 42

3.28 13.04 3.36 1.52 4.80 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 15 1 3 1 2 1 23

2.34 4.35 2.01 1.52 0.80 1.75---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 12 0 4 0 2 2 20

1.88 0.00 2.68 0.00 0.80 3.51---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 4 1 0 0 5 0 10

0.62 4.35 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 4 0 0 0 3 0 7

0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 9 0 2 0 7 1 19

1.41 0.00 1.34 0.00 2.80 1.75---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 8 0 1 4 9 3 25

1.25 0.00 0.67 6.06 3.60 5.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 3 0 0 1 0 0 4

0.47 0.00 0.00 1.52 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 0 0 0 1 0 2

0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 4 0 0 0 1 0 5

0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 5 0 0 0 0 1 6

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

87

Page 89: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.75---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 6 0 0 0 9 0 15

0.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.60 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 9 1 4 2 1 0 17

1.41 4.35 2.68 3.03 0.40 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 3 0 2 1 0 0 6

0.47 0.00 1.34 1.52 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 4 0 0 0 1 1 6

0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 1.75---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 640 23 149 66 250 57 1185

54.01 1.94 12.57 5.57 21.10 4.81=====================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------------------Immigration 95 87 182

17.03 13.77-----------------------------------------------------------Border security 85 91 176

15.23 14.40-----------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

88

Page 90: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Unemployment/jobs 38 48 866.81 7.59

-----------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 72 46 118

12.90 7.28-----------------------------------------------------------Education 16 45 61

2.87 7.12-----------------------------------------------------------The economy 22 43 65

3.94 6.80-----------------------------------------------------------Health care 21 34 55

3.76 5.38-----------------------------------------------------------Water supply 51 43 94

9.14 6.80-----------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 9 28 37

1.61 4.43-----------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 14 26 40

2.51 4.11-----------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 10 20 30

1.79 3.16-----------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 9 7 16

1.61 1.11-----------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 9 12 21

1.61 1.90-----------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 21 21 42

3.76 3.32-----------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

89

Page 91: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

State government spending 11 13 241.97 2.06

-----------------------------------------------------------Taxes 12 8 20

2.15 1.27-----------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 4 6 10

0.72 0.95-----------------------------------------------------------Energy 5 3 8

0.90 0.47-----------------------------------------------------------Environment 10 9 19

1.79 1.42-----------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 14 10 24

2.51 1.58-----------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 2 3

0.18 0.32-----------------------------------------------------------Housing 2 1 3

0.36 0.16-----------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 4 1 5

0.72 0.16-----------------------------------------------------------Voting system 1 5 6

0.18 0.79-----------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 9 6 15

1.61 0.95-----------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 4 12 16

0.72 1.90-----------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

90

Page 92: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

The media 3 3 60.54 0.47

-----------------------------------------------------------State courts 1 0 1

0.18 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 5 2 7

0.90 0.32-----------------------------------------------------------Total 558 632 1190

46.89 53.11===========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 44 95 43 182

12.46 16.13 17.34---------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 32 104 40 176

9.07 17.66 16.13---------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 28 46 12 86

7.93 7.81 4.84---------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 44 60 15 119

12.46 10.19 6.05---------------------------------------------------------------------Education 21 33 7 61

5.95 5.60 2.82

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

91

Page 93: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 16 34 15 65

4.53 5.77 6.05---------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 26 18 11 55

7.37 3.06 4.44---------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 22 40 32 94

6.23 6.79 12.90---------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 17 16 4 37

4.82 2.72 1.61---------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 8 21 10 39

2.27 3.57 4.03---------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 9 19 3 31

2.55 3.23 1.21---------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 8 7 1 16

2.27 1.19 0.40---------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 2 11 8 21

0.57 1.87 3.23---------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 14 16 11 41

3.97 2.72 4.44---------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 9 7 7 23

2.55 1.19 2.82---------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 7 9 4 20

1.98 1.53 1.61---------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 7 3 1 11

1.98 0.51 0.40

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

92

Page 94: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 0 7 0 7

0.00 1.19 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 9 8 2 19

2.55 1.36 0.81---------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 10 11 3 24

2.83 1.87 1.21---------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 2 1 4

0.28 0.34 0.40---------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 0 1 2

0.28 0.00 0.40---------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 4 0 1 5

1.13 0.00 0.40---------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 3 2 2 7

0.85 0.34 0.81---------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 1 4 10 15

0.28 0.68 4.03---------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 5 9 2 16

1.42 1.53 0.81---------------------------------------------------------------------The media 2 4 0 6

0.57 0.68 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.40---------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 3 3 1 7

0.85 0.51 0.40

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

93

Page 95: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 353 589 248 1190

29.66 49.50 20.84=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 37 54 24 13 54 182

14.68 14.67 20.51 12.15 15.56----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 37 55 19 8 58 177

14.68 14.95 16.24 7.48 16.71----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 13 27 2 9 35 86

5.16 7.34 1.71 8.41 10.09----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 28 42 9 13 26 118

11.11 11.41 7.69 12.15 7.49----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 12 25 7 7 11 62

4.76 6.79 5.98 6.54 3.17----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 11 32 4 4 14 65

4.37 8.70 3.42 3.74 4.03----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 15 9 4 9 18 55

5.95 2.45 3.42 8.41 5.19----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 4 28 5 15 41 93

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

94

Page 96: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.59 7.61 4.27 14.02 11.82----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 14 8 7 2 6 37

5.56 2.17 5.98 1.87 1.73----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 4 12 1 3 19 39

1.59 3.26 0.85 2.80 5.48----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 6 11 7 1 6 31

2.38 2.99 5.98 0.93 1.73----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 3 5 3 2 3 16

1.19 1.36 2.56 1.87 0.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 10 1 3 2 5 21

3.97 0.27 2.56 1.87 1.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 10 9 6 0 15 40

3.97 2.45 5.13 0.00 4.32----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 8 4 2 4 6 24

3.17 1.09 1.71 3.74 1.73----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 11 1 2 2 4 20

4.37 0.27 1.71 1.87 1.15----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 5 5 0 0 1 11

1.98 1.36 0.00 0.00 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 2 5 0 0 0 7

0.79 1.36 0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 3 6 0 5 5 19

1.19 1.63 0.00 4.67 1.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 12 3 4 2 4 25

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

95

Page 97: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

4.76 0.82 3.42 1.87 1.15----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 2 0 0 1 4

0.40 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 0 0 1 1 2

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.93 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 0 1 3 0 1 5

0.00 0.27 2.56 0.00 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 1 0 1 1 3 6

0.40 0.00 0.85 0.93 0.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 2 7 0 1 6 16

0.79 1.90 0.00 0.93 1.73----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 3 8 2 1 2 16

1.19 2.17 1.71 0.93 0.58----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 6 0 0 0 6

0.00 1.63 0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 0 2 2 2 1 7

0.00 0.54 1.71 1.87 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 252 368 117 107 347 1191

21.16 30.90 9.82 8.98 29.14========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

96

Page 98: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==========================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 23 34 97 27 181

11.86 10.97 21.09 11.84--------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 11 34 81 52 178

5.67 10.97 17.61 22.81--------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 28 28 25 5 86

14.43 9.03 5.43 2.19--------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 10 28 59 22 119

5.15 9.03 12.83 9.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 17 13 22 9 61

8.76 4.19 4.78 3.95--------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 17 21 19 8 65

8.76 6.77 4.13 3.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 7 17 21 12 57

3.61 5.48 4.57 5.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 18 24 26 25 93

9.28 7.74 5.65 10.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 9 11 12 5 37

4.64 3.55 2.61 2.19--------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 3 11 11 14 39

1.55 3.55 2.39 6.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

97

Page 99: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Social welfare programs 6 8 4 11 293.09 2.58 0.87 4.82

--------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 1 7 7 1 16

0.52 2.26 1.52 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 0 5 8 8 21

0.00 1.61 1.74 3.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 10 17 12 2 41

5.15 5.48 2.61 0.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 1 11 8 3 23

0.52 3.55 1.74 1.32--------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 3 3 14 0 20

1.55 0.97 3.04 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 6 1 3 1 11

3.09 0.32 0.65 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 4 2 2 0 8

2.06 0.65 0.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 3 2 10 4 19

1.55 0.65 2.17 1.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 6 9 4 5 24

3.09 2.90 0.87 2.19--------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 0 2 1 4

0.52 0.00 0.43 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 2 0 0 1 3

1.03 0.00 0.00 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

98

Page 100: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Insurance rates 0 2 0 3 50.00 0.65 0.00 1.32

--------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 2 2 2 6

0.00 0.65 0.43 0.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 4 7 4 1 16

2.06 2.26 0.87 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 3 7 3 3 16

1.55 2.26 0.65 1.32--------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 3 2 1 6

0.00 0.97 0.43 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 1 3 2 1 7

0.52 0.97 0.43 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 194 310 460 228 1192

16.28 26.01 38.59 19.13==========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

99

Page 101: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q6. Obama Approval

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 27 54 27 68 7 6 11 200

43.55 51.43 28.12 18.89 5.60 2.59 5.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 25 43 43 105 15 5 6 242

40.32 40.95 44.79 29.17 12.00 2.16 2.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

100

Page 102: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Neither approve nor disapprove 5 4 5 42 4 2 6 688.06 3.81 5.21 11.67 3.20 0.86 2.75

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 2 3 13 42 12 19 6 97

3.23 2.86 13.54 11.67 9.60 8.19 2.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 2 1 8 95 82 199 189 576

3.23 0.95 8.33 26.39 65.60 85.78 86.70--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 1 0 0 8 5 1 0 15

1.61 0.00 0.00 2.22 4.00 0.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 105 96 360 125 232 218 1198

5.18 8.76 8.01 30.05 10.43 19.37 18.20============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 108 68 24 200

41.22 18.89 4.17------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 110 105 26 241

41.98 29.17 4.52------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 15 42 12 69

5.73 11.67 2.09------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 18 42 37 97

6.87 11.67 6.43

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

101

Page 103: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 10 95 470 575

3.82 26.39 81.74------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 1 8 6 15

0.38 2.22 1.04------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 360 575 1197

21.89 30.08 48.04==============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 126 25 32 14 0 3 0 200

49.22 21.93 26.67 12.17 0.00 2.42 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 91 49 60 11 3 9 6 229

35.55 42.98 50.00 9.57 2.48 7.26 2.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 13 14 7 13 1 6 6 60

5.08 12.28 5.83 11.30 0.83 4.84 2.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 20 12 9 14 9 15 15 94

7.81 10.53 7.50 12.17 7.44 12.10 5.05---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 1 14 12 61 108 89 270 555

0.39 12.28 10.00 53.04 89.26 71.77 90.91---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 5 0 0 2 0 2 0 9

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

102

Page 104: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.95 0.00 0.00 1.74 0.00 1.61 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 114 120 115 121 124 297 1147

22.32 9.94 10.46 10.03 10.55 10.81 25.89=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 183 14 3 200

37.50 12.17 0.55--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 199 11 18 228

40.78 9.57 3.32--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 34 13 13 60

6.97 11.30 2.40--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 40 14 39 93

8.20 12.17 7.20--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 27 61 467 555

5.53 53.04 86.16--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 5 2 2 9

1.02 1.74 0.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 115 542 1145

42.62 10.04 47.34================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

103

Page 105: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 2 176 0 22 200

0.84 38.77 0.00 9.24------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 11 198 4 28 241

4.60 43.61 1.50 11.76------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 16 26 1 24 67

6.69 5.73 0.38 10.08------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 34 35 6 24 99

14.23 7.71 2.26 10.08------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 176 15 255 129 575

73.64 3.30 95.86 54.20------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 4 0 11 15

0.00 0.88 0.00 4.62------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 239 454 266 238 1197

19.97 37.93 22.22 19.88========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

104

Page 106: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

===================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 1 45 66 19 42 28 201

2.50 12.82 19.82 16.52 17.07 24.35-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 11 68 50 27 64 22 242

27.50 19.37 15.02 23.48 26.02 19.13-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 2 26 19 6 10 5 68

5.00 7.41 5.71 5.22 4.07 4.35-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 4 38 35 8 9 4 98

10.00 10.83 10.51 6.96 3.66 3.48-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 18 171 156 54 121 56 576

45.00 48.72 46.85 46.96 49.19 48.70-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 3 7 1 0 0 15

10.00 0.85 2.10 0.87 0.00 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 351 333 115 246 115 1200

3.33 29.25 27.75 9.58 20.50 9.58===================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

105

Page 107: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Approve strongly 27 27 16 56 74 20014.44 10.19 12.21 19.93 22.56

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 20 34 32 55 101 242

10.70 12.83 24.43 19.57 30.79----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 6 18 9 17 18 68

3.21 6.79 6.87 6.05 5.49----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 19 22 9 27 20 97

10.16 8.30 6.87 9.61 6.10----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 111 163 62 125 110 571

59.36 61.51 47.33 44.48 33.54----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 1 3 1 5 14

2.14 0.38 2.29 0.36 1.52----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 265 131 281 328 1192

15.69 22.23 10.99 23.57 27.52==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 80 70 48 2 0 1 0 201

11.16 44.87 17.71 9.09 0.00 7.14 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 114 47 71 3 0 3 3 241

15.90 30.13 26.20 13.64 0.00 21.43 21.43

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

106

Page 108: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 28 17 19 3 0 1 0 68

3.91 10.90 7.01 13.64 0.00 7.14 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 45 11 31 9 0 2 0 98

6.28 7.05 11.44 40.91 0.00 14.29 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 447 6 95 5 4 7 11 575

62.34 3.85 35.06 22.73 100.00 50.00 78.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 5 7 0 0 0 0 15

0.42 3.21 2.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 717 156 271 22 4 14 14 1198

59.85 13.02 22.62 1.84 0.33 1.17 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 87 3 30 10 56 15 201

13.43 13.04 19.87 15.38 21.96 25.86------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 108 3 38 9 66 18 242

16.67 13.04 25.17 13.85 25.88 31.03------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 27 3 12 2 17 7 68

4.17 13.04 7.95 3.08 6.67 12.07------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 42 1 14 4 34 3 98

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

107

Page 109: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

6.48 4.35 9.27 6.15 13.33 5.17------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 374 12 57 40 77 15 575

57.72 52.17 37.75 61.54 30.20 25.86------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 10 1 0 0 5 0 16

1.54 4.35 0.00 0.00 1.96 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 23 151 65 255 58 1200

54.00 1.92 12.58 5.42 21.25 4.83==================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total--------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 88 113 201

15.69 17.71--------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 112 130 242

19.96 20.38--------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 23 45 68

4.10 7.05--------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 40 58 98

7.13 9.09--------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 292 283 575

52.05 44.36--------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

108

Page 110: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 6 9 151.07 1.41

--------------------------------------------------------Total 561 638 1199

46.79 53.21========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 85 93 22 200

23.88 15.76 8.87------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 94 122 26 242

26.40 20.68 10.48------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 27 27 14 68

7.58 4.58 5.65------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 33 43 22 98

9.27 7.29 8.87------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 113 299 162 574

31.74 50.68 65.32------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 6 2 12

1.12 1.02 0.81------------------------------------------------------------------Total 356 590 248 1194

29.82 49.41 20.77

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

109

Page 111: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 54 64 15 26 42 201

21.60 17.39 12.20 24.30 11.97-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 46 90 19 33 53 241

18.40 24.46 15.45 30.84 15.10-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 14 19 14 7 14 68

5.60 5.16 11.38 6.54 3.99-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 21 25 10 7 35 98

8.40 6.79 8.13 6.54 9.97-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 114 166 62 33 201 576

45.60 45.11 50.41 30.84 57.26-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 1 4 3 1 6 15

0.40 1.09 2.44 0.93 1.71-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 368 123 107 351 1199

20.85 30.69 10.26 8.92 29.27=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

110

Page 112: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=======================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 29 61 80 30 200

14.57 19.37 17.43 13.27-----------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 44 66 99 33 242

22.11 20.95 21.57 14.60-----------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 19 28 17 4 68

9.55 8.89 3.70 1.77-----------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 32 31 26 9 98

16.08 9.84 5.66 3.98-----------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 67 127 232 150 576

33.67 40.32 50.54 66.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 2 5 0 15

4.02 0.63 1.09 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 199 315 459 226 1199

16.60 26.27 38.28 18.85=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

111

Page 113: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q7. Congress Approval

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 7 1 0 6 2 5 13 34

11.11 0.98 0.00 1.67 1.63 2.19 5.99--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 2 6 7 41 12 13 13 94

3.17 5.88 7.29 11.39 9.76 5.70 5.99--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

112

Page 114: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Neither approve nor disapprove 3 15 16 74 11 31 25 1754.76 14.71 16.67 20.56 8.94 13.60 11.52

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 10 18 11 68 35 75 60 277

15.87 17.65 11.46 18.89 28.46 32.89 27.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 40 61 60 152 58 102 104 577

63.49 59.80 62.50 42.22 47.15 44.74 47.93--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 1 1 2 19 5 2 2 32

1.59 0.98 2.08 5.28 4.07 0.88 0.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 102 96 360 123 228 217 1189

5.30 8.58 8.07 30.28 10.34 19.18 18.25============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 8 6 20 34

3.07 1.67 3.51------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 15 41 38 94

5.75 11.39 6.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 34 74 68 176

13.03 20.56 11.93------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 39 68 171 278

14.94 18.89 30.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

113

Page 115: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 162 152 264 578

62.07 42.22 46.32------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 19 9 31

1.15 5.28 1.58------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 360 570 1191

21.91 30.23 47.86==============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 23 1 1 1 0 1 6 33

9.20 0.88 0.85 0.89 0.00 0.80 2.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 30 18 5 7 5 6 19 90

12.00 15.79 4.27 6.25 4.17 4.80 6.40---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 41 20 11 16 13 22 35 158

16.40 17.54 9.40 14.29 10.83 17.60 11.78---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 35 23 15 23 32 40 99 267

14.00 20.18 12.82 20.54 26.67 32.00 33.33---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 114 45 85 63 70 54 135 566

45.60 39.47 72.65 56.25 58.33 43.20 45.45---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 7 0 2 0 2 3 21

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

114

Page 116: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

2.80 6.14 0.00 1.79 0.00 1.60 1.01---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 114 117 112 120 125 297 1135

22.03 10.04 10.31 9.87 10.57 11.01 26.17=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 26 1 8 35

5.39 0.89 1.47--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 52 7 30 89

10.79 6.25 5.52--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 72 16 70 158

14.94 14.29 12.89--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 74 23 171 268

15.35 20.54 31.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 244 63 258 565

50.62 56.25 47.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 14 2 6 22

2.90 1.79 1.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 482 112 543 1137

42.39 9.85 47.76================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

115

Page 117: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 5 23 2 5 35

2.07 5.12 0.75 2.11------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 21 49 15 11 96

8.71 10.91 5.64 4.64------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 43 57 22 53 175

17.84 12.69 8.27 22.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 74 67 80 59 280

30.71 14.92 30.08 24.89------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 96 247 147 87 577

39.83 55.01 55.26 36.71------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 2 6 0 22 30

0.83 1.34 0.00 9.28------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 449 266 237 1193

20.20 37.64 22.30 19.87========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

116

Page 118: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

===================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 0 16 15 2 1 0 34

0.00 4.55 4.56 1.82 0.40 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 3 25 28 8 25 6 95

7.32 7.10 8.51 7.27 10.12 5.26-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 5 69 44 17 33 8 176

12.20 19.60 13.37 15.45 13.36 7.02-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 13 64 91 35 50 28 281

31.71 18.18 27.66 31.82 20.24 24.56-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 16 166 142 46 135 71 576

39.02 47.16 43.16 41.82 54.66 62.28-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 12 9 2 3 1 31

9.76 3.41 2.74 1.82 1.21 0.88-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 329 110 247 114 1193

3.44 29.51 27.58 9.22 20.70 9.56===================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

117

Page 119: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Approve strongly 7 6 2 6 13 343.80 2.26 1.54 2.13 3.98

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 16 24 18 21 16 95

8.70 9.06 13.85 7.45 4.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 28 42 30 34 40 174

15.22 15.85 23.08 12.06 12.23----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 57 82 21 60 60 280

30.98 30.94 16.15 21.28 18.35----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 69 107 55 159 184 574

37.50 40.38 42.31 56.38 56.27----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 4 4 2 14 31

3.80 1.51 3.08 0.71 4.28----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 184 265 130 282 327 1188

15.49 22.31 10.94 23.74 27.53==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 14 9 8 2 0 0 1 34

1.95 6.08 2.94 9.09 0.00 0.00 7.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 33 25 28 7 0 1 1 95

4.60 16.89 10.29 31.82 0.00 7.69 7.69

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

118

Page 120: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 78 34 59 2 1 1 0 175

10.86 22.97 21.69 9.09 25.00 7.69 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 191 22 54 6 2 4 1 280

26.60 14.86 19.85 27.27 50.00 30.77 7.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 390 51 113 5 1 7 10 577

54.32 34.46 41.54 22.73 25.00 53.85 76.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 12 7 10 0 0 0 0 29

1.67 4.73 3.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 148 272 22 4 13 13 1190

60.34 12.44 22.86 1.85 0.34 1.09 1.09============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 9 1 0 0 24 0 34

1.39 4.35 0.00 0.00 9.64 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 38 2 10 4 38 4 96

5.87 8.70 6.71 6.15 15.26 6.90------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 84 8 22 6 47 7 174

12.98 34.78 14.77 9.23 18.88 12.07------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 173 4 35 20 38 11 281

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

119

Page 121: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

26.74 17.39 23.49 30.77 15.26 18.97------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 326 8 79 33 96 34 576

50.39 34.78 53.02 50.77 38.55 58.62------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 17 0 3 2 6 2 30

2.63 0.00 2.01 3.08 2.41 3.45------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 647 23 149 65 249 58 1191

54.32 1.93 12.51 5.46 20.91 4.87==================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total--------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 22 12 34

3.96 1.89--------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 41 54 95

7.39 8.49--------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 62 113 175

11.17 17.77--------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 117 163 280

21.08 25.63--------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 305 272 577

54.95 42.77--------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

120

Page 122: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 8 22 301.44 3.46

--------------------------------------------------------Total 555 636 1191

46.60 53.40========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 17 10 7 34

4.75 1.71 2.86------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 32 46 16 94

8.94 7.86 6.53------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 67 59 50 176

18.72 10.09 20.41------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 78 140 62 280

21.79 23.93 25.31------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 152 319 106 577

42.46 54.53 43.27------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 12 11 4 27

3.35 1.88 1.63------------------------------------------------------------------Total 358 585 245 1188

30.13 49.24 20.62

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

121

Page 123: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 5 13 0 5 12 35

1.99 3.58 0.00 4.59 3.43-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 29 22 5 4 34 94

11.55 6.06 4.10 3.67 9.71-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 38 47 28 12 51 176

15.14 12.95 22.95 11.01 14.57-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 55 83 26 26 91 281

21.91 22.87 21.31 23.85 26.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 121 189 56 57 155 578

48.21 52.07 45.90 52.29 44.29-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 9 7 5 7 31

1.20 2.48 5.74 4.59 2.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 363 122 109 350 1195

21.00 30.38 10.21 9.12 29.29=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

122

Page 124: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=======================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 16 11 6 1 34

8.21 3.55 1.30 0.44-----------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 33 25 30 7 95

16.92 8.06 6.52 3.08-----------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 41 65 49 21 176

21.03 20.97 10.65 9.25-----------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 44 70 114 52 280

22.56 22.58 24.78 22.91-----------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 53 126 255 143 577

27.18 40.65 55.43 63.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 13 6 3 30

4.10 4.19 1.30 1.32-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 195 310 460 227 1192

16.36 26.01 38.59 19.04=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

123

Page 125: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q8. Rick Perry Approval

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 8 3 2 25 22 81 99 240

12.70 2.91 2.08 6.93 17.60 35.06 45.21--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 1 8 5 71 42 101 71 299

1.59 7.77 5.21 19.67 33.60 43.72 32.42--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

124

Page 126: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Neither approve nor disapprove 6 4 18 92 28 27 22 1979.52 3.88 18.75 25.48 22.40 11.69 10.05

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 3 13 12 52 13 10 16 119

4.76 12.62 12.50 14.40 10.40 4.33 7.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 45 68 54 94 15 11 10 297

71.43 66.02 56.25 26.04 12.00 4.76 4.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 7 5 27 5 1 1 46

0.00 6.80 5.21 7.48 4.00 0.43 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 96 361 125 231 219 1198

5.26 8.60 8.01 30.13 10.43 19.28 18.28============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 13 25 202 240

4.96 6.93 35.19------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 14 71 214 299

5.34 19.67 37.28------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 27 92 77 196

10.31 25.48 13.41------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 28 52 39 119

10.69 14.40 6.79

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

125

Page 127: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 167 94 35 296

63.74 26.04 6.10------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 27 7 47

4.96 7.48 1.22------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 361 574 1197

21.89 30.16 47.95==============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 24 5 3 13 36 23 129 233

9.38 4.42 2.52 11.61 29.75 18.55 43.43---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 25 11 11 18 53 50 116 284

9.77 9.73 9.24 16.07 43.80 40.32 39.06---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 30 32 17 34 14 29 28 184

11.72 28.32 14.29 30.36 11.57 23.39 9.43---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 28 20 14 17 11 12 14 116

10.94 17.70 11.76 15.18 9.09 9.68 4.71---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 141 40 74 16 4 8 9 292

55.08 35.40 62.18 14.29 3.31 6.45 3.03---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 5 0 14 3 2 1 33

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

126

Page 128: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

3.12 4.42 0.00 12.50 2.48 1.61 0.34---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 113 119 112 121 124 297 1142

22.42 9.89 10.42 9.81 10.60 10.86 26.01=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 32 13 188 233

6.54 11.61 34.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 47 18 219 284

9.61 16.07 40.41--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 80 34 71 185

16.36 30.36 13.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 62 17 37 116

12.68 15.18 6.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 255 16 21 292

52.15 14.29 3.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 14 6 33

2.66 12.50 1.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 489 112 542 1143

42.78 9.80 47.42================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

127

Page 129: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 69 27 98 45 239

28.87 5.93 36.84 18.91------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 81 43 117 59 300

33.89 9.45 43.98 24.79------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 49 63 24 60 196

20.50 13.85 9.02 25.21------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 21 60 17 22 120

8.79 13.19 6.39 9.24------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 13 254 8 22 297

5.44 55.82 3.01 9.24------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 6 8 2 30 46

2.51 1.76 0.75 12.61------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 239 455 266 238 1198

19.95 37.98 22.20 19.87========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

128

Page 130: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

===================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 7 75 66 21 51 20 240

17.07 21.37 19.88 18.42 20.73 17.39-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 13 94 76 31 58 27 299

31.71 26.78 22.89 27.19 23.58 23.48-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 4 75 51 16 33 17 196

9.76 21.37 15.36 14.04 13.41 14.78-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 1 30 38 17 23 11 120

2.44 8.55 11.45 14.91 9.35 9.57-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 12 57 85 26 77 40 297

29.27 16.24 25.60 22.81 31.30 34.78-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 20 16 3 4 0 47

9.76 5.70 4.82 2.63 1.63 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 351 332 114 246 115 1199

3.42 29.27 27.69 9.51 20.52 9.59===================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

129

Page 131: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Approve strongly 67 60 28 39 44 23835.83 22.64 21.21 13.88 13.54

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 45 89 30 83 51 298

24.06 33.58 22.73 29.54 15.69----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 24 51 34 40 47 196

12.83 19.25 25.76 14.23 14.46----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 19 25 12 24 36 116

10.16 9.43 9.09 8.54 11.08----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 24 30 24 90 128 296

12.83 11.32 18.18 32.03 39.38----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 10 4 5 19 46

4.28 3.77 3.03 1.78 5.85----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 265 132 281 325 1190

15.71 22.27 11.09 23.61 27.31==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 174 11 42 4 2 2 5 240

24.34 7.05 15.44 17.39 50.00 16.67 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 201 16 62 11 0 5 4 299

28.11 10.26 22.79 47.83 0.00 41.67 28.57

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

130

Page 132: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 95 39 57 3 2 0 1 197

13.29 25.00 20.96 13.04 50.00 0.00 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 57 24 33 3 0 0 1 118

7.97 15.38 12.13 13.04 0.00 0.00 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 175 54 57 2 0 5 3 296

24.48 34.62 20.96 8.70 0.00 41.67 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 12 21 0 0 0 0 46

1.82 7.69 7.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 715 156 272 23 4 12 14 1196

59.78 13.04 22.74 1.92 0.33 1.00 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 148 3 16 14 51 6 238

22.95 13.04 10.67 21.54 20.08 10.53------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 180 6 29 23 48 12 298

27.91 26.09 19.33 35.38 18.90 21.05------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 101 4 27 9 46 9 196

15.66 17.39 18.00 13.85 18.11 15.79------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 65 1 21 6 22 4 119

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

131

Page 133: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

10.08 4.35 14.00 9.23 8.66 7.02------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 134 4 57 13 71 18 297

20.78 17.39 38.00 20.00 27.95 31.58------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 17 5 0 0 16 8 46

2.64 21.74 0.00 0.00 6.30 14.04------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 645 23 150 65 254 57 1194

54.02 1.93 12.56 5.44 21.27 4.77==================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total--------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 127 113 240

22.64 17.74--------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 135 164 299

24.06 25.75--------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 89 107 196

15.86 16.80--------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 55 65 120

9.80 10.20--------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 139 158 297

24.78 24.80--------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

132

Page 134: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 16 30 462.85 4.71

--------------------------------------------------------Total 561 637 1198

46.83 53.17========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 66 113 61 240

18.59 19.19 24.60------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 63 148 87 298

17.75 25.13 35.08------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 56 100 39 195

15.77 16.98 15.73------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 50 58 12 120

14.08 9.85 4.84------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 107 150 39 296

30.14 25.47 15.73------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 20 10 43

3.66 3.40 4.03------------------------------------------------------------------Total 355 589 248 1192

29.78 49.41 20.81

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

133

Page 135: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 44 72 29 13 81 239

17.67 19.62 23.77 12.15 23.14-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 58 85 32 16 107 298

23.29 23.16 26.23 14.95 30.57-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 44 60 18 15 58 195

17.67 16.35 14.75 14.02 16.57-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 30 38 11 18 23 120

12.05 10.35 9.02 16.82 6.57-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 65 98 28 43 63 297

26.10 26.70 22.95 40.19 18.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 14 4 2 18 46

3.21 3.81 3.28 1.87 5.14-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 249 367 122 107 350 1195

20.84 30.71 10.21 8.95 29.29=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

134

Page 136: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=======================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 24 56 105 54 239

12.12 17.95 22.88 24.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 46 73 109 70 298

23.23 23.40 23.75 31.11-----------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 50 60 62 24 196

25.25 19.23 13.51 10.67-----------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 29 26 44 20 119

14.65 8.33 9.59 8.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 30 77 134 55 296

15.15 24.68 29.19 24.44-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 19 20 5 2 46

9.60 6.41 1.09 0.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 312 459 225 1194

16.58 26.13 38.44 18.84=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

135

Page 137: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q9. Right Direction/Wrong Track, Country

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 24 66 37 108 18 9 10 272

39.34 64.08 38.54 30.17 14.52 3.91 4.61-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 23 21 40 173 93 216 202 768

37.70 20.39 41.67 48.32 75.00 93.91 93.09-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

136

Page 138: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 14 16 19 77 13 5 5 14922.95 15.53 19.79 21.51 10.48 2.17 2.30

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 61 103 96 358 124 230 217 1189

5.13 8.66 8.07 30.11 10.43 19.34 18.25=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 127 108 38 273

49.03 30.17 6.64---------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 83 173 511 767

32.05 48.32 89.34---------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 49 77 23 149

18.92 21.51 4.02---------------------------------------------------------------Total 259 358 572 1189

21.78 30.11 48.11===============================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

137

Page 139: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 135 40 54 17 5 7 8 266

52.94 35.40 45.76 15.18 4.10 5.65 2.72------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 69 48 45 81 113 104 281 741

27.06 42.48 38.14 72.32 92.62 83.87 95.58------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 51 25 19 14 4 13 5 131

20.00 22.12 16.10 12.50 3.28 10.48 1.70------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 113 118 112 122 124 294 1138

22.41 9.93 10.37 9.84 10.72 10.90 25.83==========================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 230 17 20 267

47.23 15.18 3.70-----------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 162 81 498 741

33.26 72.32 92.22-----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 95 14 22 131

19.51 12.50 4.07-----------------------------------------------------------------Total 487 112 540 1139

42.76 9.83 47.41=================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

138

Page 140: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 17 227 4 26 274

7.20 50.11 1.50 10.92---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 204 142 261 163 770

86.44 31.35 98.12 68.49---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 15 84 1 49 149

6.36 18.54 0.38 20.59---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 236 453 266 238 1193

19.78 37.97 22.30 19.95=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 8 79 74 25 65 23 274

19.51 22.51 22.42 21.93 26.42 20.35----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 23 234 209 74 153 78 771

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

139

Page 141: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

56.10 66.67 63.33 64.91 62.20 69.03----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 10 38 47 15 28 12 150

24.39 10.83 14.24 13.16 11.38 10.62----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 351 330 114 246 113 1195

3.43 29.37 27.62 9.54 20.59 9.46====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 34 43 27 76 94 274

18.18 16.17 20.61 27.34 28.75-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 142 198 82 169 175 766

75.94 74.44 62.60 60.79 53.52-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 11 25 22 33 58 149

5.88 9.40 16.79 11.87 17.74-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 266 131 278 327 1189

15.73 22.37 11.02 23.38 27.50===================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

140

Page 142: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=====================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 104 69 92 6 0 2 0 273

14.53 44.23 34.20 27.27 0.00 14.29 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 542 47 140 16 4 8 14 771

75.70 30.13 52.04 72.73 100.00 57.14 100.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 70 40 37 0 0 4 0 151

9.78 25.64 13.75 0.00 0.00 28.57 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 716 156 269 22 4 14 14 1195

59.92 13.05 22.51 1.84 0.33 1.17 1.17=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 123 2 37 13 78 21 274

18.98 8.70 24.50 20.00 31.20 36.84---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 462 19 90 43 132 23 769

71.30 82.61 59.60 66.15 52.80 40.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 63 2 24 9 40 13 151

9.72 8.70 15.89 13.85 16.00 22.81---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 23 151 65 250 57 1194

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

141

Page 143: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

54.27 1.93 12.65 5.44 20.94 4.77===================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------Right direction 133 141 274

23.79 22.17-----------------------------------------Wrong track 379 392 771

67.80 61.64-----------------------------------------Don't know 47 103 150

8.41 16.19-----------------------------------------Total 559 636 1195

46.78 53.22=========================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------Right direction 116 126 32 274

32.49 21.58 12.90

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

142

Page 144: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------Wrong track 182 396 191 769

50.98 67.81 77.02---------------------------------------------------Don't know 59 62 25 146

16.53 10.62 10.08---------------------------------------------------Total 357 584 248 1189

30.03 49.12 20.86===================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 66 96 20 35 57 274

26.29 26.16 16.39 33.02 16.38----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 161 217 91 49 252 770

64.14 59.13 74.59 46.23 72.41----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 54 11 22 39 150

9.56 14.71 9.02 20.75 11.21----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 367 122 106 348 1194

21.02 30.74 10.22 8.88 29.15======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

143

Page 145: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

========================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------Right direction 51 71 110 41 273

25.76 22.61 24.12 18.22--------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 110 202 287 171 770

55.56 64.33 62.94 76.00--------------------------------------------------------Don't know 37 41 59 13 150

18.69 13.06 12.94 5.78--------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 456 225 1193

16.60 26.32 38.22 18.86========================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

144

Page 146: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q10. National Economy: Better o↵/Worse O↵

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 15 10 9 32 5 4 9 84

24.19 9.71 9.28 8.91 4.03 1.72 4.13------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 24 64 54 84 24 26 7 283

38.71 62.14 55.67 23.40 19.35 11.21 3.21------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

145

Page 147: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

About the same 13 21 22 126 25 51 50 30820.97 20.39 22.68 35.10 20.16 21.98 22.94

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 4 8 6 77 46 86 71 298

6.45 7.77 6.19 21.45 37.10 37.07 32.57------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 6 0 5 28 21 62 74 196

9.68 0.00 5.15 7.80 16.94 26.72 33.94------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 0 1 12 3 3 7 26

0.00 0.00 1.03 3.34 2.42 1.29 3.21------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 97 359 124 232 218 1195

5.19 8.62 8.12 30.04 10.38 19.41 18.24==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 34 32 18 84

12.88 8.91 3.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 142 84 57 283

53.79 23.40 9.93----------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 56 126 126 308

21.21 35.10 21.95----------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 19 77 203 299

7.20 21.45 35.37

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

146

Page 148: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 11 28 157 196

4.17 7.80 27.35----------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 2 12 13 27

0.76 3.34 2.26----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 264 359 574 1197

22.06 29.99 47.95============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 54 7 16 2 2 0 1 82

21.18 6.14 13.33 1.79 1.67 0.00 0.34-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 109 42 64 19 9 12 23 278

42.75 36.84 53.33 16.96 7.50 9.76 7.72-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 43 45 23 41 25 40 71 288

16.86 39.47 19.17 36.61 20.83 32.52 23.83-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 33 16 16 31 50 40 99 285

12.94 14.04 13.33 27.68 41.67 32.52 33.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 8 3 1 18 34 26 99 189

3.14 2.63 0.83 16.07 28.33 21.14 33.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 1 0 1 0 5 5 20

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

147

Page 149: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

3.14 0.88 0.00 0.89 0.00 4.07 1.68-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 114 120 112 120 123 298 1142

22.33 9.98 10.51 9.81 10.51 10.77 26.09=======================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 77 2 3 82

15.75 1.79 0.55------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 214 19 44 277

43.76 16.96 8.12------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 111 41 137 289

22.70 36.61 25.28------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 65 31 189 285

13.29 27.68 34.87------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 13 18 159 190

2.66 16.07 29.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 9 1 10 20

1.84 0.89 1.85------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 489 112 542 1143

42.78 9.80 47.42==============================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

148

Page 150: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 5 72 0 6 83

2.07 15.93 0.00 2.53----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 32 217 10 24 283

13.28 48.01 3.75 10.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 79 94 56 78 307

32.78 20.80 20.97 32.91----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 70 51 100 79 300

29.05 11.28 37.45 33.33----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 52 11 98 35 196

21.58 2.43 36.70 14.77----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 7 3 15 28

1.24 1.55 1.12 6.33----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 452 267 237 1197

20.13 37.76 22.31 19.80======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

149

Page 151: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 4 23 24 9 14 9 83

9.52 6.50 7.25 7.89 5.69 7.83-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 1 66 84 25 71 36 283

2.38 18.64 25.38 21.93 28.86 31.30-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 15 105 84 32 47 25 308

35.71 29.66 25.38 28.07 19.11 21.74-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 14 97 73 26 70 23 303

33.33 27.40 22.05 22.81 28.46 20.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 4 58 52 20 42 21 197

9.52 16.38 15.71 17.54 17.07 18.26-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 5 14 2 2 1 28

9.52 1.41 4.23 1.75 0.81 0.87-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 42 354 331 114 246 115 1202

3.49 29.45 27.54 9.48 20.47 9.57=================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

150

Page 152: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

A lot better off 17 8 3 20 35 839.04 3.01 2.31 7.07 10.67

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 35 41 30 84 93 283

18.62 15.41 23.08 29.68 28.35--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 37 75 47 54 93 306

19.68 28.20 36.15 19.08 28.35--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 42 83 33 73 67 298

22.34 31.20 25.38 25.80 20.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 51 56 12 50 28 197

27.13 21.05 9.23 17.67 8.54--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 6 3 5 2 12 28

3.19 1.13 3.85 0.71 3.66--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 266 130 283 328 1195

15.73 22.26 10.88 23.68 27.45================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 38 22 22 1 0 0 0 83

5.29 14.29 8.12 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 140 60 72 5 0 4 0 281

19.50 38.96 26.57 22.73 0.00 30.77 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

151

Page 153: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 179 41 76 5 0 4 3 308

24.93 26.62 28.04 22.73 0.00 30.77 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 203 18 62 9 2 4 2 300

28.27 11.69 22.88 40.91 66.67 30.77 14.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 144 6 33 2 1 1 9 196

20.06 3.90 12.18 9.09 33.33 7.69 64.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 14 7 6 0 0 0 0 27

1.95 4.55 2.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 154 271 22 3 13 14 1195

60.08 12.89 22.68 1.84 0.25 1.09 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 31 2 4 3 39 5 84

4.78 8.33 2.65 4.69 15.35 8.77----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 134 4 52 14 65 14 283

20.65 16.67 34.44 21.88 25.59 24.56----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 168 10 34 16 56 23 307

25.89 41.67 22.52 25.00 22.05 40.35----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 167 3 39 20 61 11 301

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

152

Page 154: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

25.73 12.50 25.83 31.25 24.02 19.30----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 138 5 18 10 24 2 197

21.26 20.83 11.92 15.62 9.45 3.51----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 11 0 4 1 9 2 27

1.69 0.00 2.65 1.56 3.54 3.51----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 649 24 151 64 254 57 1199

54.13 2.00 12.59 5.34 21.18 4.75================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================gender

Q Male Female Total------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 48 36 84

8.56 5.64------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 140 143 283

24.96 22.41------------------------------------------------------About the same 112 196 308

19.96 30.72------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 156 145 301

27.81 22.73------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 93 103 196

16.58 16.14------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

153

Page 155: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 12 15 272.14 2.35

------------------------------------------------------Total 561 638 1199

46.79 53.21======================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total----------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 37 33 14 84

10.36 5.58 5.65----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 109 146 28 283

30.53 24.70 11.29----------------------------------------------------------------About the same 84 153 71 308

23.53 25.89 28.63----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 80 146 74 300

22.41 24.70 29.84----------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 36 102 59 197

10.08 17.26 23.79----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 11 11 2 24

3.08 1.86 0.81----------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 591 248 1196

29.85 49.41 20.74

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

154

Page 156: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 16 29 6 15 18 84

6.43 7.88 4.96 14.02 5.13-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 65 104 21 39 53 282

26.10 28.26 17.36 36.45 15.10-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 69 87 36 22 93 307

27.71 23.64 29.75 20.56 26.50-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 41 97 38 19 106 301

16.47 26.36 31.40 17.76 30.20-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 53 47 17 10 68 195

21.29 12.77 14.05 9.35 19.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 5 4 3 2 13 27

2.01 1.09 2.48 1.87 3.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 249 368 121 107 351 1196

20.82 30.77 10.12 8.95 29.35===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

155

Page 157: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=====================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total---------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 17 22 38 6 83

8.63 7.03 8.23 2.65---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 46 74 111 51 282

23.35 23.64 24.03 22.57---------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 64 92 114 37 307

32.49 29.39 24.68 16.37---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 50 72 106 73 301

25.38 23.00 22.94 32.30---------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 11 41 86 59 197

5.58 13.10 18.61 26.11---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 9 12 7 0 28

4.57 3.83 1.52 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 197 313 462 226 1198

16.44 26.13 38.56 18.86=====================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

156

Page 158: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q11. Right Direction/Wrong Track, Texas

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 10 26 21 131 73 173 152 586

16.13 25.24 21.65 36.49 58.87 74.57 70.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 39 57 58 133 30 41 41 399

62.90 55.34 59.79 37.05 24.19 17.67 19.07-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

157

Page 159: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 13 20 18 95 21 18 22 20720.97 19.42 18.56 26.46 16.94 7.76 10.23

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 97 359 124 232 215 1192

5.20 8.64 8.14 30.12 10.40 19.46 18.04=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 58 131 398 587

22.05 36.49 69.70---------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 154 133 112 399

58.56 37.05 19.61---------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 51 95 61 207

19.39 26.46 10.68---------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 359 571 1193

22.05 30.09 47.86===============================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

158

Page 160: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 73 44 22 51 86 72 230 578

28.63 38.60 18.49 45.95 71.07 57.60 77.44------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 131 47 72 31 17 34 52 384

51.37 41.23 60.50 27.93 14.05 27.20 17.51------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 51 23 25 29 18 19 15 180

20.00 20.18 21.01 26.13 14.88 15.20 5.05------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 114 119 111 121 125 297 1142

22.33 9.98 10.42 9.72 10.60 10.95 26.01==========================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 139 51 387 577

28.43 45.95 71.53-----------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 250 31 103 384

51.12 27.93 19.04-----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 100 29 51 180

20.45 26.13 9.43-----------------------------------------------------------------Total 489 111 541 1141

42.86 9.73 47.41=================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

159

Page 161: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 147 126 217 99 589

61.00 27.69 81.89 41.95---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 70 239 33 58 400

29.05 52.53 12.45 24.58---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 90 15 79 208

9.96 19.78 5.66 33.47---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 455 265 236 1197

20.13 38.01 22.14 19.72=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 16 188 141 49 128 66 588

39.02 53.41 42.60 43.36 52.24 57.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 15 93 123 40 90 39 400

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

160

Page 162: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

36.59 26.42 37.16 35.40 36.73 34.21----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 10 71 67 24 27 9 208

24.39 20.17 20.24 21.24 11.02 7.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 331 113 245 114 1196

3.43 29.43 27.68 9.45 20.48 9.53====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 107 146 66 132 133 584

56.91 55.30 50.38 47.14 40.43-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 48 70 38 110 133 399

25.53 26.52 29.01 39.29 40.43-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 33 48 27 38 63 209

17.55 18.18 20.61 13.57 19.15-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 264 131 280 329 1192

15.77 22.15 10.99 23.49 27.60===================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

161

Page 163: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

====================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 365 52 133 17 3 7 10 587

51.05 33.33 49.08 77.27 75.00 53.85 71.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 246 60 82 4 0 4 4 400

34.41 38.46 30.26 18.18 0.00 30.77 28.57------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 104 44 56 1 1 2 0 208

14.55 28.21 20.66 4.55 25.00 15.38 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 715 156 271 22 4 13 14 1195

59.83 13.05 22.68 1.84 0.33 1.09 1.17====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 361 12 47 35 108 24 587

55.80 52.17 31.33 53.85 42.52 42.11---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 190 6 75 20 91 19 401

29.37 26.09 50.00 30.77 35.83 33.33---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 96 5 28 10 55 14 208

14.84 21.74 18.67 15.38 21.65 24.56---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 647 23 150 65 254 57 1196

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

162

Page 164: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

54.10 1.92 12.54 5.43 21.24 4.77===================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------Right direction 303 284 587

54.01 44.79-----------------------------------------Wrong track 179 221 400

31.91 34.86-----------------------------------------Don't know 79 129 208

14.08 20.35-----------------------------------------Total 561 634 1195

46.95 53.05=========================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------Right direction 159 305 123 587

44.92 51.69 49.60

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

163

Page 165: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------Wrong track 133 196 71 400

37.57 33.22 28.63---------------------------------------------------Don't know 62 89 54 205

17.51 15.08 21.77---------------------------------------------------Total 354 590 248 1192

29.70 49.50 20.81===================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 124 171 71 39 182 587

50.00 46.47 57.72 36.45 51.85----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 87 136 34 50 94 401

35.08 36.96 27.64 46.73 26.78----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 37 61 18 18 75 209

14.92 16.58 14.63 16.82 21.37----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 248 368 123 107 351 1197

20.72 30.74 10.28 8.94 29.32======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

164

Page 166: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

========================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------Right direction 82 140 241 125 588

41.62 44.59 52.39 55.31--------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 56 118 159 68 401

28.43 37.58 34.57 30.09--------------------------------------------------------Don't know 59 56 60 33 208

29.95 17.83 13.04 14.60--------------------------------------------------------Total 197 314 460 226 1197

16.46 26.23 38.43 18.88========================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

165

Page 167: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q12. Personal Economy: Better o↵/Worse o↵

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 6 5 6 23 7 10 15 72

9.52 4.85 6.19 6.37 5.69 4.31 6.88------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 23 31 27 73 22 50 26 252

36.51 30.10 27.84 20.22 17.89 21.55 11.93------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

166

Page 168: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

About the same 16 50 45 152 52 97 97 50925.40 48.54 46.39 42.11 42.28 41.81 44.50

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 7 14 16 72 35 57 53 254

11.11 13.59 16.49 19.94 28.46 24.57 24.31------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 6 3 3 26 4 18 27 87

9.52 2.91 3.09 7.20 3.25 7.76 12.39------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 5 0 0 15 3 0 0 23

7.94 0.00 0.00 4.16 2.44 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 97 361 123 232 218 1197

5.26 8.60 8.10 30.16 10.28 19.38 18.21==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 16 23 32 71

6.11 6.37 5.58----------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 81 73 97 251

30.92 20.22 16.93----------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 110 152 245 507

41.98 42.11 42.76----------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 38 72 145 255

14.50 19.94 25.31

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

167

Page 169: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 12 26 50 88

4.58 7.20 8.73----------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 5 15 4 24

1.91 4.16 0.70----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 361 573 1196

21.91 30.18 47.91============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 34 7 10 4 7 3 4 69

13.28 6.19 8.40 3.57 5.79 2.42 1.34-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 68 25 38 16 21 22 56 246

26.56 22.12 31.93 14.29 17.36 17.74 18.79-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 95 52 53 50 49 64 126 489

37.11 46.02 44.54 44.64 40.50 51.61 42.28-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 38 21 15 32 34 27 73 240

14.84 18.58 12.61 28.57 28.10 21.77 24.50-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 14 7 3 9 10 7 38 88

5.47 6.19 2.52 8.04 8.26 5.65 12.75-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 1 0 1 0 1 1 11

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

168

Page 170: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

2.73 0.88 0.00 0.89 0.00 0.81 0.34-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 113 119 112 121 124 298 1143

22.40 9.89 10.41 9.80 10.59 10.85 26.07=======================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 51 4 14 69

10.45 3.57 2.57------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 131 16 100 247

26.84 14.29 18.38------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 200 50 239 489

40.98 44.64 43.93------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 74 32 134 240

15.16 28.57 24.63------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 24 9 55 88

4.92 8.04 10.11------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 1 2 11

1.64 0.89 0.37------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 112 544 1144

42.66 9.79 47.55==============================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

169

Page 171: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 12 49 7 4 72

4.98 10.79 2.64 1.67----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 40 138 46 27 251

16.60 30.40 17.36 11.30----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 112 177 109 109 507

46.47 38.99 41.13 45.61----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 46 71 79 60 256

19.09 15.64 29.81 25.10----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 31 15 24 19 89

12.86 3.30 9.06 7.95----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 4 0 20 24

0.00 0.88 0.00 8.37----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 454 265 239 1199

20.10 37.86 22.10 19.93======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

170

Page 172: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 0 19 18 9 22 4 72

0.00 5.38 5.42 7.89 8.94 3.48-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 6 56 64 25 66 34 251

15.38 15.86 19.28 21.93 26.83 29.57-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 9 156 146 46 97 52 506

23.08 44.19 43.98 40.35 39.43 45.22-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 19 78 74 19 49 17 256

48.72 22.10 22.29 16.67 19.92 14.78-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 1 40 18 12 11 8 90

2.56 11.33 5.42 10.53 4.47 6.96-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 4 12 3 1 0 24

10.26 1.13 3.61 2.63 0.41 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 39 353 332 114 246 115 1199

3.25 29.44 27.69 9.51 20.52 9.59=================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

171

Page 173: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

A lot better off 17 17 6 14 17 719.09 6.39 4.55 4.95 5.17

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 38 54 23 63 74 252

20.32 20.30 17.42 22.26 22.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 61 121 74 106 145 507

32.62 45.49 56.06 37.46 44.07--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 35 55 22 75 66 253

18.72 20.68 16.67 26.50 20.06--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 29 14 6 24 18 91

15.51 5.26 4.55 8.48 5.47--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 5 1 1 9 23

3.74 1.88 0.76 0.35 2.74--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 266 132 283 329 1197

15.62 22.22 11.03 23.64 27.49================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 24 27 19 1 0 0 0 71

3.33 17.31 6.99 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 159 28 52 5 1 4 2 251

22.08 17.95 19.12 22.73 33.33 28.57 14.29

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

172

Page 174: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 305 60 119 15 0 6 3 508

42.36 38.46 43.75 68.18 0.00 42.86 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 167 29 47 1 1 4 7 256

23.19 18.59 17.28 4.55 33.33 28.57 50.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 52 8 28 0 1 0 2 91

7.22 5.13 10.29 0.00 33.33 0.00 14.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 4 7 0 0 0 0 24

1.81 2.56 2.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 720 156 272 22 3 14 14 1201

59.95 12.99 22.65 1.83 0.25 1.17 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 34 3 2 2 30 0 71

5.24 13.04 1.32 3.12 11.81 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 129 3 32 5 70 12 251

19.88 13.04 21.05 7.81 27.56 21.05----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 285 5 66 30 87 33 506

43.91 21.74 43.42 46.88 34.25 57.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 142 6 40 19 40 10 257

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

173

Page 175: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

21.88 26.09 26.32 29.69 15.75 17.54----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 53 3 12 7 14 1 90

8.17 13.04 7.89 10.94 5.51 1.75----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 6 3 0 1 13 1 24

0.92 13.04 0.00 1.56 5.12 1.75----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 649 23 152 64 254 57 1199

54.13 1.92 12.68 5.34 21.18 4.75================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================gender

Q Male Female Total------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 39 32 71

6.94 5.02------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 128 123 251

22.78 19.28------------------------------------------------------About the same 245 263 508

43.59 41.22------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 101 155 256

17.97 24.29------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 40 50 90

7.12 7.84------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

174

Page 176: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 9 15 241.60 2.35

------------------------------------------------------Total 562 638 1200

46.83 53.17======================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total----------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 30 31 10 71

8.40 5.25 4.02----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 93 123 35 251

26.05 20.85 14.06----------------------------------------------------------------About the same 142 259 106 507

39.78 43.90 42.57----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 61 130 65 256

17.09 22.03 26.10----------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 28 36 26 90

7.84 6.10 10.44----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 11 7 21

0.84 1.86 2.81----------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 590 249 1196

29.85 49.33 20.82

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

175

Page 177: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 13 31 2 14 12 72

5.18 8.42 1.64 12.96 3.42-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 55 79 27 22 68 251

21.91 21.47 22.13 20.37 19.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 105 144 47 49 163 508

41.83 39.13 38.52 45.37 46.44-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 49 87 29 14 77 256

19.52 23.64 23.77 12.96 21.94-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 23 21 14 8 24 90

9.16 5.71 11.48 7.41 6.84-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 6 6 3 1 7 23

2.39 1.63 2.46 0.93 1.99-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 368 122 108 351 1200

20.92 30.67 10.17 9.00 29.25===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

176

Page 178: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=====================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total---------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 15 35 19 2 71

7.65 11.15 4.11 0.88---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 55 66 105 26 252

28.06 21.02 22.73 11.45---------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 71 134 192 110 507

36.22 42.68 41.56 48.46---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 29 48 111 67 255

14.80 15.29 24.03 29.52---------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 9 25 34 22 90

4.59 7.96 7.36 9.69---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 17 6 1 0 24

8.67 1.91 0.22 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 196 314 462 227 1199

16.35 26.19 38.53 18.93=====================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

177

Page 179: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Elections

Q13. 2014 Senate Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 3 1 6 49 64 164 141 428

4.76 0.97 6.25 13.61 52.03 70.69 64.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 38 71 53 112 8 8 9 299

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

178

Page 180: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

60.32 68.93 55.21 31.11 6.50 3.45 4.15--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 2 4 0 19 14 12 11 62

3.17 3.88 0.00 5.28 11.38 5.17 5.07--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 3 3 7 8 2 1 6 30

4.76 2.91 7.29 2.22 1.63 0.43 2.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 2 0 4 10 8 22 18 64

3.17 0.00 4.17 2.78 6.50 9.48 8.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 15 24 26 162 27 25 32 311

23.81 23.30 27.08 45.00 21.95 10.78 14.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 96 360 123 232 217 1194

5.28 8.63 8.04 30.15 10.30 19.43 18.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 10 49 368 427

3.80 13.61 64.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 162 112 26 300

61.60 31.11 4.54--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 6 19 38 63

2.28 5.28 6.63--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

179

Page 181: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Emily Sanchez 13 8 9 304.94 2.22 1.57

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 7 10 48 65

2.66 2.78 8.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 65 162 84 311

24.71 45.00 14.66--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 360 573 1196

21.99 30.10 47.91==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 7 6 4 15 70 64 248 414

2.75 5.22 3.36 13.51 58.33 51.61 83.22-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 172 46 67 5 2 2 1 295

67.45 40.00 56.30 4.50 1.67 1.61 0.34-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 2 5 5 15 19 14 2 62

0.78 4.35 4.20 13.51 15.83 11.29 0.67-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 3 8 10 4 2 0 3 30

1.18 6.96 8.40 3.60 1.67 0.00 1.01-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 5 1 2 12 13 13 16 62

1.96 0.87 1.68 10.81 10.83 10.48 5.37

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

180

Page 182: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 66 49 31 60 14 31 28 279

25.88 42.61 26.05 54.05 11.67 25.00 9.40-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 115 119 111 120 124 298 1142

22.33 10.07 10.42 9.72 10.51 10.86 26.09=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 17 15 382 414

3.48 13.51 70.48----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 285 5 5 295

58.40 4.50 0.92----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 12 15 35 62

2.46 13.51 6.46----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 21 4 4 29

4.30 3.60 0.74----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 7 12 43 62

1.43 10.81 7.93----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 146 60 73 279

29.92 54.05 13.47----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 111 542 1141

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

181

Page 183: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

42.77 9.73 47.50====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 161 12 173 83 429

67.08 2.64 65.28 34.73--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 3 289 0 8 300

1.25 63.52 0.00 3.35--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 7 13 34 9 63

2.92 2.86 12.83 3.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 4 21 3 3 31

1.67 4.62 1.13 1.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 12 10 33 10 65

5.00 2.20 12.45 4.18--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 53 110 22 126 311

22.08 24.18 8.30 52.72--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 455 265 239 1199

20.02 37.95 22.10 19.93============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

182

Page 184: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 11 125 118 45 81 49 429

26.83 35.41 35.65 39.82 32.79 42.98---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 2 71 79 28 78 42 300

4.88 20.11 23.87 24.78 31.58 36.84---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 6 10 19 1 20 8 64

14.63 2.83 5.74 0.88 8.10 7.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 2 9 6 5 9 1 32

4.88 2.55 1.81 4.42 3.64 0.88---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 2 21 18 7 13 3 64

4.88 5.95 5.44 6.19 5.26 2.63---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 18 117 91 27 46 11 310

43.90 33.14 27.49 23.89 18.62 9.65---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 353 331 113 247 114 1199

3.42 29.44 27.61 9.42 20.60 9.51=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

183

Page 185: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 91 127 44 85 80 427

48.66 47.92 33.59 30.04 24.32--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 31 35 32 86 116 300

16.58 13.21 24.43 30.39 35.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 5 13 10 15 18 61

2.67 4.91 7.63 5.30 5.47--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 3 1 7 8 12 31

1.60 0.38 5.34 2.83 3.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 20 18 4 10 12 64

10.70 6.79 3.05 3.53 3.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 37 71 34 79 91 312

19.79 26.79 25.95 27.92 27.66--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 265 131 283 329 1195

15.65 22.18 10.96 23.68 27.53============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 346 7 56 4 3 7 5 428

48.19 4.55 20.59 18.18 75.00 53.85 33.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

184

Page 186: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

David Alameel 151 67 68 9 0 1 3 29921.03 43.51 25.00 40.91 0.00 7.69 20.00

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 44 4 13 1 0 0 2 64

6.13 2.60 4.78 4.55 0.00 0.00 13.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 10 2 14 1 0 3 0 30

1.39 1.30 5.15 4.55 0.00 23.08 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 39 5 13 2 1 0 5 65

5.43 3.25 4.78 9.09 25.00 0.00 33.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 128 69 108 5 0 2 0 312

17.83 44.81 39.71 22.73 0.00 15.38 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 154 272 22 4 13 15 1198

59.93 12.85 22.70 1.84 0.33 1.09 1.25============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 281 4 38 36 56 14 429

43.36 16.67 25.17 55.38 22.05 24.56--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 137 1 57 10 75 19 299

21.14 4.17 37.75 15.38 29.53 33.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 44 0 5 2 11 1 63

6.79 0.00 3.31 3.08 4.33 1.75

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

185

Page 187: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 15 0 1 0 13 2 31

2.31 0.00 0.66 0.00 5.12 3.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 36 1 6 5 17 0 65

5.56 4.17 3.97 7.69 6.69 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 135 18 44 12 82 21 312

20.83 75.00 29.14 18.46 32.28 36.84--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 24 151 65 254 57 1199

54.05 2.00 12.59 5.42 21.18 4.75======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 216 213 429

38.50 33.33----------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 149 151 300

26.56 23.63----------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 39 25 64

6.95 3.91----------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 17 13 30

3.03 2.03----------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 27 38 65

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

186

Page 188: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

4.81 5.95----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 113 199 312

20.14 31.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 561 639 1200

46.75 53.25============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 95 208 124 427

26.54 35.31 50.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 125 149 26 300

34.92 25.30 10.48--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 12 36 15 63

3.35 6.11 6.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 18 13 0 31

5.03 2.21 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 10 42 13 65

2.79 7.13 5.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 98 141 70 309

27.37 23.94 28.23--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

187

Page 189: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Total 358 589 248 119529.96 49.29 20.75

======================================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 86 131 45 20 147 429

34.26 35.60 37.19 18.52 41.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 66 98 22 43 71 300

26.29 26.63 18.18 39.81 20.17--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 14 16 5 5 24 64

5.58 4.35 4.13 4.63 6.82--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 10 9 4 4 3 30

3.98 2.45 3.31 3.70 0.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 15 17 6 7 20 65

5.98 4.62 4.96 6.48 5.68--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 60 97 39 29 87 312

23.90 26.36 32.23 26.85 24.72--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 368 121 108 352 1200

20.92 30.67 10.08 9.00 29.33============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

188

Page 190: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 30 95 182 122 429

15.15 30.35 39.48 53.51-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 38 86 124 52 300

19.19 27.48 26.90 22.81-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 14 21 27 2 64

7.07 6.71 5.86 0.88-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 14 7 6 4 31

7.07 2.24 1.30 1.75-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 13 12 26 13 64

6.57 3.83 5.64 5.70-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 89 92 96 35 312

44.95 29.39 20.82 15.35-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 313 461 228 1200

16.50 26.08 38.42 19.00===========================================================================================

Q14. 2014 Governor Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

189

Page 191: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 47 83 73 141 20 10 8 382

75.81 80.58 76.04 39.61 16.13 4.33 3.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 2 5 5 64 71 195 179 521

3.23 4.85 5.21 17.98 57.26 84.42 82.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 1 1 1 8 9 9 6 35

1.61 0.97 1.04 2.25 7.26 3.90 2.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 1 0 3 5 0 1 4 14

1.61 0.00 3.12 1.40 0.00 0.43 1.84--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

190

Page 192: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Someone else 1 1 2 14 6 2 5 311.61 0.97 2.08 3.93 4.84 0.87 2.30

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 10 13 12 124 18 14 15 206

16.13 12.62 12.50 34.83 14.52 6.06 6.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 96 356 124 231 217 1189

5.21 8.66 8.07 29.94 10.43 19.43 18.25============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 204 141 38 383

77.86 39.61 6.64--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 12 64 445 521

4.58 17.98 77.80--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 2 8 25 35

0.76 2.25 4.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 5 5 5 15

1.91 1.40 0.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 4 14 12 30

1.53 3.93 2.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 35 124 47 206

13.36 34.83 8.22

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

191

Page 193: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 356 572 1190

22.02 29.92 48.07==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 189 69 87 12 4 8 5 374

74.41 60.53 73.73 10.62 3.28 6.45 1.68-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 11 15 5 28 101 86 268 514

4.33 13.16 4.24 24.78 82.79 69.35 89.93-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 4 4 2 12 7 4 3 36

1.57 3.51 1.69 10.62 5.74 3.23 1.01-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 5 1 1 4 2 0 2 15

1.97 0.88 0.85 3.54 1.64 0.00 0.67-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 5 1 9 5 2 2 6 30

1.97 0.88 7.63 4.42 1.64 1.61 2.01-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 40 24 14 52 6 24 14 174

15.75 21.05 11.86 46.02 4.92 19.35 4.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 114 118 113 122 124 298 1143

22.22 9.97 10.32 9.89 10.67 10.85 26.07=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

192

Page 194: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 345 12 16 373

71.13 10.62 2.96----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 30 28 454 512

6.19 24.78 83.92----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 10 12 13 35

2.06 10.62 2.40----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 7 4 4 15

1.44 3.54 0.74----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 14 5 10 29

2.89 4.42 1.85----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 79 52 44 175

16.29 46.02 8.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 485 113 541 1139

42.58 9.92 47.50====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

193

Page 195: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 18 345 2 18 383

7.44 76.50 0.75 7.63--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 171 24 237 92 524

70.66 5.32 89.10 38.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 8 8 10 10 36

3.31 1.77 3.76 4.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 1 9 3 2 15

0.41 2.00 1.13 0.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 8 14 4 6 32

3.31 3.10 1.50 2.54--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 36 51 10 108 205

14.88 11.31 3.76 45.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 242 451 266 236 1195

20.25 37.74 22.26 19.75============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 6 98 89 45 94 51 383

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

194

Page 196: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

15.00 27.92 26.81 39.82 38.37 44.74---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 18 145 154 43 115 49 524

45.00 41.31 46.39 38.05 46.94 42.98---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 2 8 9 4 4 7 34

5.00 2.28 2.71 3.54 1.63 6.14---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 0 6 7 1 1 1 16

0.00 1.71 2.11 0.88 0.41 0.88---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 2 17 2 6 4 0 31

5.00 4.84 0.60 5.31 1.63 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 12 77 71 14 27 6 207

30.00 21.94 21.39 12.39 11.02 5.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 351 332 113 245 114 1195

3.35 29.37 27.78 9.46 20.50 9.54=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 42 47 37 110 148 384

22.22 17.74 28.68 39.01 45.12--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 105 155 58 106 95 519

55.56 58.49 44.96 37.59 28.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

195

Page 197: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Kathy Glass 7 6 6 9 9 373.70 2.26 4.65 3.19 2.74

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 1 4 3 0 7 15

0.53 1.51 2.33 0.00 2.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 5 8 3 15 1 32

2.65 3.02 2.33 5.32 0.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 29 45 22 42 68 206

15.34 16.98 17.05 14.89 20.73--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 189 265 129 282 328 1193

15.84 22.21 10.81 23.64 27.49============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 185 83 95 11 0 6 3 383

25.87 54.25 35.06 50.00 0.00 46.15 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 410 8 80 5 4 6 10 523

57.34 5.23 29.52 22.73 100.00 46.15 71.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 20 7 6 1 0 0 1 35

2.80 4.58 2.21 4.55 0.00 0.00 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 7 4 2 1 0 0 0 14

0.98 2.61 0.74 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

196

Page 198: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 13 2 14 2 0 0 0 31

1.82 1.31 5.17 9.09 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 80 49 74 2 0 1 0 206

11.19 32.03 27.31 9.09 0.00 7.69 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 715 153 271 22 4 13 14 1192

59.98 12.84 22.73 1.85 0.34 1.09 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 178 7 68 14 90 25 382

27.51 30.43 45.95 21.88 35.57 44.64--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 340 7 52 43 71 11 524

52.55 30.43 35.14 67.19 28.06 19.64--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 20 0 2 0 12 2 36

3.09 0.00 1.35 0.00 4.74 3.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 6 0 1 0 4 3 14

0.93 0.00 0.68 0.00 1.58 5.36--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 16 0 0 1 13 0 30

2.47 0.00 0.00 1.56 5.14 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 87 9 25 6 63 15 205

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

197

Page 199: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

13.45 39.13 16.89 9.38 24.90 26.79--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 647 23 148 64 253 56 1191

54.32 1.93 12.43 5.37 21.24 4.70======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 181 202 383

32.26 31.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 259 265 524

46.17 41.80----------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 22 13 35

3.92 2.05----------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 8 7 15

1.43 1.10----------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 17 15 32

3.03 2.37----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 74 132 206

13.19 20.82----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 561 634 1195

46.95 53.05============================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

198

Page 200: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 153 190 40 383

42.86 32.15 16.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 109 272 142 523

30.53 46.02 58.20--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 9 20 7 36

2.52 3.38 2.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 6 8 1 15

1.68 1.35 0.41--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 11 6 14 31

3.08 1.02 5.74--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 69 95 40 204

19.33 16.07 16.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 591 244 1192

29.95 49.58 20.47======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

199

Page 201: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 82 128 33 62 78 383

32.67 34.97 27.27 57.94 22.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 112 149 59 29 176 525

44.62 40.71 48.76 27.10 50.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 5 10 3 7 11 36

1.99 2.73 2.48 6.54 3.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 2 8 0 0 5 15

0.80 2.19 0.00 0.00 1.42--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 7 5 4 0 15 31

2.79 1.37 3.31 0.00 4.27--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 43 66 22 9 66 206

17.13 18.03 18.18 8.41 18.80--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 366 121 107 351 1196

20.99 30.60 10.12 8.95 29.35============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

200

Page 202: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Wendy Davis 49 116 156 62 38324.62 36.94 34.06 27.56

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 57 113 222 133 525

28.64 35.99 48.47 59.11-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 11 12 11 2 36

5.53 3.82 2.40 0.89-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 7 4 3 1 15

3.52 1.27 0.66 0.44-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 7 7 14 4 32

3.52 2.23 3.06 1.78-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 68 62 52 23 205

34.17 19.75 11.35 10.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 199 314 458 225 1196

16.64 26.25 38.29 18.81===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

201

Page 203: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q15. 2014 Lieutenant Governor Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 45 69 60 112 15 8 5 314

71.43 66.99 61.86 31.20 12.00 3.45 2.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 1 1 6 57 63 191 170 489

1.59 0.97 6.19 15.88 50.40 82.33 78.70--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

202

Page 204: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Robert Butler 0 2 3 8 15 5 13 460.00 1.94 3.09 2.23 12.00 2.16 6.02

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 1 4 4 6 2 0 1 18

1.59 3.88 4.12 1.67 1.60 0.00 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 3 1 3 21 6 13 6 53

4.76 0.97 3.09 5.85 4.80 5.60 2.78--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 13 26 21 155 24 15 21 275

20.63 25.24 21.65 43.18 19.20 6.47 9.72--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 97 359 125 232 216 1195

5.27 8.62 8.12 30.04 10.46 19.41 18.08============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 174 112 28 314

66.41 31.20 4.90--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 8 57 424 489

3.05 15.88 74.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 5 8 33 46

1.91 2.23 5.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 9 6 2 17

3.44 1.67 0.35

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

203

Page 205: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 6 21 25 52

2.29 5.85 4.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 60 155 60 275

22.90 43.18 10.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 359 572 1193

21.96 30.09 47.95==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 169 44 77 3 4 7 6 310

66.27 38.94 65.25 2.65 3.33 5.65 2.01-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 11 9 7 30 93 79 250 479

4.31 7.96 5.93 26.55 77.50 63.71 83.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 6 7 4 4 12 3 10 46

2.35 6.19 3.39 3.54 10.00 2.42 3.36-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 4 5 4 3 0 1 0 17

1.57 4.42 3.39 2.65 0.00 0.81 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 6 7 2 13 1 6 14 49

2.35 6.19 1.69 11.50 0.83 4.84 4.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 59 41 24 60 10 28 18 240

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

204

Page 206: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

23.14 36.28 20.34 53.10 8.33 22.58 6.04-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 113 118 113 120 124 298 1141

22.35 9.90 10.34 9.90 10.52 10.87 26.12=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 290 3 17 310

59.92 2.65 3.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 27 30 422 479

5.58 26.55 77.72----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 16 4 25 45

3.31 3.54 4.60----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 13 3 1 17

2.69 2.65 0.18----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 14 13 22 49

2.89 11.50 4.05----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 124 60 56 240

25.62 53.10 10.31----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 484 113 543 1140

42.46 9.91 47.63====================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

205

Page 207: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 14 288 2 10 314

5.86 63.72 0.75 4.20--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 142 26 237 87 492

59.41 5.75 88.76 36.55--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 16 16 9 5 46

6.69 3.54 3.37 2.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 1 13 2 1 17

0.42 2.88 0.75 0.42--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 23 17 3 8 51

9.62 3.76 1.12 3.36--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 43 92 14 127 276

17.99 20.35 5.24 53.36--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 239 452 267 238 1196

19.98 37.79 22.32 19.90============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

206

Page 208: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 5 74 70 36 88 41 314

12.50 21.02 21.21 31.86 35.77 35.96---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 17 132 137 42 111 51 490

42.50 37.50 41.52 37.17 45.12 44.74---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 1 10 16 7 6 6 46

2.50 2.84 4.85 6.19 2.44 5.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 2 5 8 1 2 0 18

5.00 1.42 2.42 0.88 0.81 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 0 21 14 5 6 5 51

0.00 5.97 4.24 4.42 2.44 4.39---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 15 110 85 22 33 11 276

37.50 31.25 25.76 19.47 13.41 9.65---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 352 330 113 246 114 1195

3.35 29.46 27.62 9.46 20.59 9.54=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

207

Page 209: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Leticia Van de Putte 28 35 31 98 122 31414.81 13.16 23.48 35.00 37.20

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 96 148 62 98 83 487

50.79 55.64 46.97 35.00 25.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 9 8 9 8 12 46

4.76 3.01 6.82 2.86 3.66--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 5 1 3 1 8 18

2.65 0.38 2.27 0.36 2.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 18 13 4 10 8 53

9.52 4.89 3.03 3.57 2.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 33 61 23 65 95 277

17.46 22.93 17.42 23.21 28.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 189 266 132 280 328 1195

15.82 22.26 11.05 23.43 27.45============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 159 57 84 9 0 4 0 313

22.18 37.01 31.00 42.86 0.00 28.57 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 386 18 61 6 3 6 11 491

53.84 11.69 22.51 28.57 75.00 42.86 78.57

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

208

Page 210: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 32 4 8 1 0 1 0 46

4.46 2.60 2.95 4.76 0.00 7.14 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 6 4 5 1 0 0 0 16

0.84 2.60 1.85 4.76 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 24 12 15 0 1 0 0 52

3.35 7.79 5.54 0.00 25.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 110 59 98 4 0 3 3 277

15.34 38.31 36.16 19.05 0.00 21.43 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 717 154 271 21 4 14 14 1195

60.00 12.89 22.68 1.76 0.33 1.17 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 151 3 60 14 69 17 314

23.37 13.04 40.00 21.88 27.17 28.81--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 324 9 50 35 57 15 490

50.15 39.13 33.33 54.69 22.44 25.42--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 25 0 2 1 14 4 46

3.87 0.00 1.33 1.56 5.51 6.78--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 6 0 1 0 9 2 18

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

209

Page 211: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.93 0.00 0.67 0.00 3.54 3.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 26 0 4 3 16 3 52

4.02 0.00 2.67 4.69 6.30 5.08--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 114 11 33 11 89 18 276

17.65 47.83 22.00 17.19 35.04 30.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 646 23 150 64 254 59 1196

54.01 1.92 12.54 5.35 21.24 4.93======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 151 163 314

26.92 25.67----------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 254 237 491

45.28 37.32----------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 22 23 45

3.92 3.62----------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 9 8 17

1.60 1.26----------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 20 32 52

3.57 5.04----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

210

Page 212: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 105 172 27718.72 27.09

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 561 635 1196

46.91 53.09============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 138 143 33 314

38.66 24.28 13.47--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 100 257 133 490

28.01 43.63 54.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 14 20 11 45

3.92 3.40 4.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 3 14 0 17

0.84 2.38 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 19 19 14 52

5.32 3.23 5.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 83 136 54 273

23.25 23.09 22.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 589 245 1191

29.97 49.45 20.57

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

211

Page 213: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

======================================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 69 100 31 47 67 314

27.60 27.17 25.83 43.52 19.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 96 152 49 28 166 491

38.40 41.30 40.83 25.93 47.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 7 19 2 7 10 45

2.80 5.16 1.67 6.48 2.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 4 8 2 1 3 18

1.60 2.17 1.67 0.93 0.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 19 5 9 5 14 52

7.60 1.36 7.50 4.63 4.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 55 84 27 20 90 276

22.00 22.83 22.50 18.52 25.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 368 120 108 350 1196

20.90 30.77 10.03 9.03 29.26============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

212

Page 214: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 32 94 132 56 314

16.16 29.94 28.76 24.67-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 48 99 218 126 491

24.24 31.53 47.49 55.51-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 9 16 17 4 46

4.55 5.10 3.70 1.76-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 11 4 1 1 17

5.56 1.27 0.22 0.44-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 9 15 21 7 52

4.55 4.78 4.58 3.08-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 89 86 70 33 278

44.95 27.39 15.25 14.54-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 459 227 1198

16.53 26.21 38.31 18.95===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

213

Page 215: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q16. 2014 Attorney General Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 40 67 55 117 15 15 15 324

63.49 65.05 57.29 32.59 12.10 6.52 6.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 2 1 8 55 59 193 163 481

3.17 0.97 8.33 15.32 47.58 83.91 75.12--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

214

Page 216: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Jamie Balagia 0 5 4 7 9 1 4 300.00 4.85 4.17 1.95 7.26 0.43 1.84

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 6 3 2 11 5 0 7 34

9.52 2.91 2.08 3.06 4.03 0.00 3.23--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 15 27 27 169 36 21 28 323

23.81 26.21 28.12 47.08 29.03 9.13 12.90--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 96 359 124 230 217 1192

5.29 8.64 8.05 30.12 10.40 19.30 18.20============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 162 117 45 324

61.60 32.59 7.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 11 55 415 481

4.18 15.32 72.55--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 10 7 15 32

3.80 1.95 2.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 11 11 12 34

4.18 3.06 2.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 69 169 85 323

26.24 47.08 14.86

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

215

Page 217: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 359 572 1194

22.03 30.07 47.91==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 165 54 69 13 7 3 10 321

64.45 47.79 57.50 11.71 5.83 2.42 3.36-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 6 7 6 28 96 77 250 470

2.34 6.19 5.00 25.23 80.00 62.10 83.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 7 3 3 7 6 4 1 31

2.73 2.65 2.50 6.31 5.00 3.23 0.34-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 8 4 7 4 0 2 9 34

3.12 3.54 5.83 3.60 0.00 1.61 3.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 70 45 35 59 11 38 28 286

27.34 39.82 29.17 53.15 9.17 30.65 9.40-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 113 120 111 120 124 298 1142

22.42 9.89 10.51 9.72 10.51 10.86 26.09=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

216

Page 218: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 287 13 20 320

58.81 11.71 3.70----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 19 28 423 470

3.89 25.23 78.19----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 13 7 11 31

2.66 6.31 2.03----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 19 4 10 33

3.89 3.60 1.85----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 150 59 77 286

30.74 53.15 14.23----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 111 541 1140

42.81 9.74 47.46====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 20 289 7 10 326

8.26 63.80 2.64 4.18

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

217

Page 219: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 146 16 232 89 483

60.33 3.53 87.55 37.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 4 12 9 7 32

1.65 2.65 3.40 2.93--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 10 21 2 0 33

4.13 4.64 0.75 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 62 115 15 133 325

25.62 25.39 5.66 55.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 242 453 265 239 1199

20.18 37.78 22.10 19.93============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 5 84 71 40 84 41 325

12.20 23.86 21.32 35.40 34.15 36.61---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 14 137 129 43 110 50 483

34.15 38.92 38.74 38.05 44.72 44.64---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 2 4 13 2 6 4 31

4.88 1.14 3.90 1.77 2.44 3.57---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 0 11 13 1 5 3 33

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

218

Page 220: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 3.12 3.90 0.88 2.03 2.68---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 20 116 107 27 41 14 325

48.78 32.95 32.13 23.89 16.67 12.50---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 333 113 246 112 1197

3.43 29.41 27.82 9.44 20.55 9.36=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 39 44 34 83 124 324

20.97 16.60 25.56 29.54 37.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 98 143 56 97 84 478

52.69 53.96 42.11 34.52 25.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 1 2 8 7 13 31

0.54 0.75 6.02 2.49 3.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 8 2 5 12 7 34

4.30 0.75 3.76 4.27 2.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 40 74 30 82 99 325

21.51 27.92 22.56 29.18 30.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 186 265 133 281 327 1192

15.60 22.23 11.16 23.57 27.43============================================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

219

Page 221: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 163 68 73 12 0 4 4 324

22.73 44.16 26.84 52.17 0.00 30.77 28.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 377 5 76 5 4 6 10 483

52.58 3.25 27.94 21.74 100.00 46.15 71.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 22 3 6 1 0 0 0 32

3.07 1.95 2.21 4.35 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 14 9 10 0 0 0 0 33

1.95 5.84 3.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 141 69 107 5 0 3 0 325

19.67 44.81 39.34 21.74 0.00 23.08 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 717 154 272 23 4 13 14 1197

59.90 12.87 22.72 1.92 0.33 1.09 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

220

Page 222: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 152 2 51 13 91 17 326

23.53 8.33 33.77 20.00 35.69 29.82--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 324 5 48 36 59 11 483

50.15 20.83 31.79 55.38 23.14 19.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 23 0 2 0 6 1 32

3.56 0.00 1.32 0.00 2.35 1.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 13 1 2 0 12 5 33

2.01 4.17 1.32 0.00 4.71 8.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 134 16 48 16 87 23 324

20.74 66.67 31.79 24.62 34.12 40.35--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 646 24 151 65 255 57 1198

53.92 2.00 12.60 5.43 21.29 4.76======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 159 165 324

28.39 25.90----------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 258 225 483

46.07 35.32----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

221

Page 223: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Jamie Balagia 14 17 312.50 2.67

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 21 13 34

3.75 2.04----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 108 217 325

19.29 34.07----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 560 637 1197

46.78 53.22============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 123 157 45 325

34.45 26.61 18.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 101 251 130 482

28.29 42.54 52.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 11 17 4 32

3.08 2.88 1.63--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 17 10 6 33

4.76 1.69 2.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 105 155 61 321

29.41 26.27 24.80

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

222

Page 224: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 590 246 1193

29.92 49.46 20.62======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 69 102 28 41 84 324

27.60 27.87 22.95 38.32 24.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 100 139 56 24 163 482

40.00 37.98 45.90 22.43 46.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 4 14 3 4 7 32

1.60 3.83 2.46 3.74 2.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 6 19 1 6 1 33

2.40 5.19 0.82 5.61 0.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 71 92 34 32 95 324

28.40 25.14 27.87 29.91 27.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 366 122 107 350 1195

20.92 30.63 10.21 8.95 29.29============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

223

Page 225: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 52 90 126 57 325

26.26 28.75 27.45 25.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 44 102 205 131 482

22.22 32.59 44.66 57.96-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 6 8 17 0 31

3.03 2.56 3.70 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 5 16 13 0 34

2.53 5.11 2.83 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 91 97 98 38 324

45.96 30.99 21.35 16.81-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 313 459 226 1196

16.56 26.17 38.38 18.90===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

224

Page 226: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q17. 2014 Comptroller Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 42 60 57 109 10 8 10 296

70.00 58.82 58.16 30.36 8.00 3.48 4.59--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 0 0 6 38 43 153 140 380

0.00 0.00 6.12 10.58 34.40 66.52 64.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

225

Page 227: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Ben Sanders 2 3 1 13 10 13 16 583.33 2.94 1.02 3.62 8.00 5.65 7.34

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 4 2 4 8 1 0 2 21

6.67 1.96 4.08 2.23 0.80 0.00 0.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 12 37 30 191 61 56 50 437

20.00 36.27 30.61 53.20 48.80 24.35 22.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 60 102 98 359 125 230 218 1192

5.03 8.56 8.22 30.12 10.49 19.30 18.29============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 159 109 27 295

60.92 30.36 4.72--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 6 38 336 380

2.30 10.58 58.74--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 6 13 39 58

2.30 3.62 6.82--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 11 8 3 22

4.21 2.23 0.52--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 79 191 167 437

30.27 53.20 29.20

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

226

Page 228: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 359 572 1192

21.90 30.12 47.99==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 169 43 59 4 4 4 8 291

66.27 37.72 50.43 3.57 3.28 3.23 2.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 4 3 4 19 63 59 223 375

1.57 2.63 3.42 16.96 51.64 47.58 75.34-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 7 9 7 10 10 8 4 55

2.75 7.89 5.98 8.93 8.20 6.45 1.35-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 4 2 5 5 2 3 0 21

1.57 1.75 4.27 4.46 1.64 2.42 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 71 57 42 74 43 50 61 398

27.84 50.00 35.90 66.07 35.25 40.32 20.61-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 114 117 112 122 124 296 1140

22.37 10.00 10.26 9.82 10.70 10.88 25.96=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

227

Page 229: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 271 4 16 291

55.76 3.57 2.95----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 11 19 345 375

2.26 16.96 63.65----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 23 10 23 56

4.73 8.93 4.24----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 11 5 5 21

2.26 4.46 0.92----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 170 74 153 397

34.98 66.07 28.23----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 112 542 1140

42.63 9.82 47.54====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 10 275 5 6 296

4.13 60.84 1.89 2.53

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

228

Page 230: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 144 8 175 55 382

59.50 1.77 66.29 23.21--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 6 20 22 10 58

2.48 4.42 8.33 4.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 4 14 3 1 22

1.65 3.10 1.14 0.42--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 78 135 59 165 437

32.23 29.87 22.35 69.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 242 452 264 237 1195

20.25 37.82 22.09 19.83============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 3 73 74 35 73 38 296

7.32 20.68 22.42 30.97 29.80 33.33---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 8 114 103 31 83 44 383

19.51 32.29 31.21 27.43 33.88 38.60---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 4 8 15 7 16 7 57

9.76 2.27 4.55 6.19 6.53 6.14---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 0 5 6 3 4 4 22

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

229

Page 231: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 1.42 1.82 2.65 1.63 3.51---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 26 153 132 37 69 21 438

63.41 43.34 40.00 32.74 28.16 18.42---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 353 330 113 245 114 1196

3.43 29.52 27.59 9.45 20.48 9.53=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 29 43 34 82 107 295

15.51 16.35 25.95 29.29 32.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 85 131 34 70 62 382

45.45 49.81 25.95 25.00 18.90--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 9 9 12 12 15 57

4.81 3.42 9.16 4.29 4.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 4 6 2 3 7 22

2.14 2.28 1.53 1.07 2.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 60 74 49 113 137 433

32.09 28.14 37.40 40.36 41.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 263 131 280 328 1189

15.73 22.12 11.02 23.55 27.59============================================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

230

Page 232: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 141 68 71 10 0 4 1 295

19.72 44.16 26.10 45.45 0.00 30.77 7.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 318 2 50 3 2 1 6 382

44.48 1.30 18.38 13.64 50.00 7.69 46.15--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 33 11 8 2 0 2 1 57

4.62 7.14 2.94 9.09 0.00 15.38 7.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 13 5 3 0 0 0 0 21

1.82 3.25 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 210 68 140 7 2 6 5 438

29.37 44.16 51.47 31.82 50.00 46.15 38.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 715 154 272 22 4 13 13 1193

59.93 12.91 22.80 1.84 0.34 1.09 1.09============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

231

Page 233: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 142 2 57 9 73 12 295

21.98 8.70 37.75 13.85 28.85 21.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 253 9 35 33 46 8 384

39.16 39.13 23.18 50.77 18.18 14.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 40 0 2 2 11 3 58

6.19 0.00 1.32 3.08 4.35 5.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 8 0 3 0 8 3 22

1.24 0.00 1.99 0.00 3.16 5.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 203 12 54 21 115 31 436

31.42 52.17 35.76 32.31 45.45 54.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 646 23 151 65 253 57 1195

54.06 1.92 12.64 5.44 21.17 4.77======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 142 153 295

25.45 24.06----------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 194 189 383

34.77 29.72----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

232

Page 234: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Ben Sanders 34 24 586.09 3.77

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 11 10 21

1.97 1.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 177 260 437

31.72 40.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 558 636 1194

46.73 53.27============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 120 143 32 295

33.52 24.32 12.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 68 201 113 382

18.99 34.18 45.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 22 28 8 58

6.15 4.76 3.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 11 10 2 23

3.07 1.70 0.81--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 137 206 92 435

38.27 35.03 37.25

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

233

Page 235: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 358 588 247 1193

30.01 49.29 20.70======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 64 95 21 45 70 295

25.70 25.82 17.21 42.45 19.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 76 108 35 28 136 383

30.52 29.35 28.69 26.42 38.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 10 27 7 4 10 58

4.02 7.34 5.74 3.77 2.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 5 9 1 1 6 22

2.01 2.45 0.82 0.94 1.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 94 129 58 28 129 438

37.75 35.05 47.54 26.42 36.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 249 368 122 106 351 1196

20.82 30.77 10.20 8.86 29.35============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

234

Page 236: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 43 80 122 50 295

21.72 25.48 26.64 22.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 38 75 165 105 383

19.19 23.89 36.03 46.67-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 10 25 19 3 57

5.05 7.96 4.15 1.33-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 6 9 7 0 22

3.03 2.87 1.53 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 101 125 145 67 438

51.01 39.81 31.66 29.78-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 458 225 1195

16.57 26.28 38.33 18.83===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

235

Page 237: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q18. 2014 Land Commissioner Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 40 64 49 107 13 11 12 296

63.49 62.14 51.04 29.72 10.40 4.76 5.50--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 2 1 10 63 59 151 147 433

3.17 0.97 10.42 17.50 47.20 65.37 67.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

236

Page 238: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Justin Knight 3 1 7 15 15 18 17 764.76 0.97 7.29 4.17 12.00 7.79 7.80

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 5 7 6 11 1 1 5 36

7.94 6.80 6.25 3.06 0.80 0.43 2.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 13 30 24 164 37 50 37 355

20.63 29.13 25.00 45.56 29.60 21.65 16.97--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 96 360 125 231 218 1196

5.27 8.61 8.03 30.10 10.45 19.31 18.23============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 153 107 35 295

58.62 29.72 6.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 13 63 358 434

4.98 17.50 62.48--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 11 15 49 75

4.21 4.17 8.55--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 17 11 7 35

6.51 3.06 1.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 67 164 124 355

25.67 45.56 21.64

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

237

Page 239: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 360 573 1194

21.86 30.15 47.99==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 172 48 63 3 6 2 0 294

67.72 42.11 52.50 2.68 4.96 1.61 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 5 13 4 30 65 74 232 423

1.97 11.40 3.33 26.79 53.72 59.68 78.11-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 7 7 5 15 16 12 10 72

2.76 6.14 4.17 13.39 13.22 9.68 3.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 8 4 12 3 4 0 4 35

3.15 3.51 10.00 2.68 3.31 0.00 1.35-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 62 42 36 61 30 36 51 318

24.41 36.84 30.00 54.46 24.79 29.03 17.17-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 114 120 112 121 124 297 1142

22.24 9.98 10.51 9.81 10.60 10.86 26.01=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

238

Page 240: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 283 3 8 294

57.99 2.68 1.47----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 22 30 372 424

4.51 26.79 68.51----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 19 15 38 72

3.89 13.39 7.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 24 3 8 35

4.92 2.68 1.47----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 140 61 117 318

28.69 54.46 21.55----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 112 543 1143

42.69 9.80 47.51====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 8 278 1 8 295

3.32 61.37 0.38 3.38

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

239

Page 241: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 162 23 177 73 435

67.22 5.08 66.79 30.80--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 16 17 34 8 75

6.64 3.75 12.83 3.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 2 25 3 5 35

0.83 5.52 1.13 2.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 53 110 50 143 356

21.99 24.28 18.87 60.34--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 453 265 237 1196

20.15 37.88 22.16 19.82============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 6 75 67 39 70 38 295

15.00 21.25 20.18 34.21 28.46 33.63---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 15 128 132 34 88 39 436

37.50 36.26 39.76 29.82 35.77 34.51---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 2 16 21 3 20 12 74

5.00 4.53 6.33 2.63 8.13 10.62---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 0 5 7 8 9 6 35

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

240

Page 242: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 1.42 2.11 7.02 3.66 5.31---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 17 129 105 30 59 18 358

42.50 36.54 31.63 26.32 23.98 15.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 353 332 114 246 113 1198

3.34 29.47 27.71 9.52 20.53 9.43=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 39 38 32 79 108 296

20.86 14.29 24.43 28.11 32.93--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 85 128 51 87 84 435

45.45 48.12 38.93 30.96 25.61--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 12 18 15 13 12 70

6.42 6.77 11.45 4.63 3.66--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 6 6 2 7 14 35

3.21 2.26 1.53 2.49 4.27--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 45 76 31 95 110 357

24.06 28.57 23.66 33.81 33.54--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 266 131 281 328 1193

15.67 22.30 10.98 23.55 27.49============================================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

241

Page 243: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 137 70 78 9 0 0 1 295

19.08 45.16 28.57 39.13 0.00 0.00 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 342 10 67 6 4 4 3 436

47.63 6.45 24.54 26.09 100.00 33.33 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 43 6 19 2 0 0 5 75

5.99 3.87 6.96 8.70 0.00 0.00 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 24 4 4 1 0 2 0 35

3.34 2.58 1.47 4.35 0.00 16.67 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 172 65 105 5 0 6 5 358

23.96 41.94 38.46 21.74 0.00 50.00 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 155 273 23 4 12 14 1199

59.88 12.93 22.77 1.92 0.33 1.00 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

242

Page 244: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 129 4 53 15 76 19 296

19.97 17.39 34.87 23.08 29.80 32.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 290 5 48 38 45 10 436

44.89 21.74 31.58 58.46 17.65 17.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 49 1 2 1 19 3 75

7.59 4.35 1.32 1.54 7.45 5.17--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 18 0 6 0 10 2 36

2.79 0.00 3.95 0.00 3.92 3.45--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 160 13 43 11 105 24 356

24.77 56.52 28.29 16.92 41.18 41.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 646 23 152 65 255 58 1199

53.88 1.92 12.68 5.42 21.27 4.84======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 134 161 295

23.89 25.27----------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 215 221 436

38.32 34.69----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

243

Page 245: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Justin Knight 49 26 758.73 4.08

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 18 17 35

3.21 2.67----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 145 212 357

25.85 33.28----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 561 637 1198

46.83 53.17============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 130 131 34 295

36.41 22.24 13.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 95 225 115 435

26.61 38.20 46.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 17 44 14 75

4.76 7.47 5.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 7 22 6 35

1.96 3.74 2.42--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 108 167 79 354

30.25 28.35 31.85

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

244

Page 246: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 589 248 1194

29.90 49.33 20.77======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 65 90 23 44 72 294

26.00 24.52 18.70 40.74 20.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 96 128 45 20 147 436

38.40 34.88 36.59 18.52 42.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 17 23 11 8 16 75

6.80 6.27 8.94 7.41 4.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 1 18 1 5 10 35

0.40 4.90 0.81 4.63 2.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 71 108 43 31 105 358

28.40 29.43 34.96 28.70 30.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 367 123 108 350 1198

20.87 30.63 10.27 9.02 29.22============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

245

Page 247: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 37 80 131 49 297

18.69 25.56 28.42 21.59-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 45 84 181 126 436

22.73 26.84 39.26 55.51-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 17 30 22 5 74

8.59 9.58 4.77 2.20-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 9 12 12 2 35

4.55 3.83 2.60 0.88-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 90 107 115 45 357

45.45 34.19 24.95 19.82-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 313 461 227 1199

16.51 26.11 38.45 18.93===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

246

Page 248: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q19. 2014 Commissioner of Agriculture Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 36 61 51 103 13 8 9 281

59.02 58.65 53.68 28.77 10.57 3.48 4.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 1 3 4 38 44 154 140 384

1.64 2.88 4.21 10.61 35.77 66.96 64.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

247

Page 249: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Rocky Palmquist 0 2 3 14 9 10 14 520.00 1.92 3.16 3.91 7.32 4.35 6.42

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 11 6 8 20 2 10 8 65

18.03 5.77 8.42 5.59 1.63 4.35 3.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 13 32 29 183 55 48 47 407

21.31 30.77 30.53 51.12 44.72 20.87 21.56--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 61 104 95 358 123 230 218 1189

5.13 8.75 7.99 30.11 10.34 19.34 18.33============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 147 103 30 280

56.76 28.77 5.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 8 38 338 384

3.09 10.61 59.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 5 14 33 52

1.93 3.91 5.79--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 25 20 20 65

9.65 5.59 3.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 74 183 149 406

28.57 51.12 26.14

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

248

Page 250: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 259 358 570 1187

21.82 30.16 48.02==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 151 41 66 4 7 5 5 279

59.45 36.94 55.46 3.60 5.79 4.03 1.69-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 9 1 2 17 64 64 217 374

3.54 0.90 1.68 15.32 52.89 51.61 73.31-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 2 7 3 12 12 9 6 51

0.79 6.31 2.52 10.81 9.92 7.26 2.03-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 17 7 14 10 6 4 7 65

6.69 6.31 11.76 9.01 4.96 3.23 2.36-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 75 55 34 68 32 42 61 367

29.53 49.55 28.57 61.26 26.45 33.87 20.61-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 111 119 111 121 124 296 1136

22.36 9.77 10.48 9.77 10.65 10.92 26.06=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

249

Page 251: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 258 4 16 278

53.09 3.60 2.96----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 12 17 345 374

2.47 15.32 63.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 13 12 27 52

2.67 10.81 5.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 38 10 17 65

7.82 9.01 3.15----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 165 68 135 368

33.95 61.26 25.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 111 540 1137

42.74 9.76 47.49====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 12 256 3 9 280

5.00 56.89 1.13 3.80

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

250

Page 252: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 127 10 184 65 386

52.92 2.22 69.43 27.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 5 14 27 6 52

2.08 3.11 10.19 2.53--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 20 37 7 2 66

8.33 8.22 2.64 0.84--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 76 133 44 155 408

31.67 29.56 16.60 65.40--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 450 265 237 1192

20.13 37.75 22.23 19.88============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 8 68 69 28 73 35 281

20.00 19.32 20.85 25.69 29.92 30.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 9 108 111 34 86 39 387

22.50 30.68 33.53 31.19 35.25 34.21---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 4 12 11 1 15 8 51

10.00 3.41 3.32 0.92 6.15 7.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 0 14 14 16 13 8 65

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

251

Page 253: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 3.98 4.23 14.68 5.33 7.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 19 150 126 30 57 24 406

47.50 42.61 38.07 27.52 23.36 21.05---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 352 331 109 244 114 1190

3.36 29.58 27.82 9.16 20.50 9.58=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 30 37 26 83 104 280

16.30 14.02 19.85 29.75 31.80--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 84 119 37 77 68 385

45.65 45.08 28.24 27.60 20.80--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 3 6 11 12 16 48

1.63 2.27 8.40 4.30 4.89--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 9 20 12 7 17 65

4.89 7.58 9.16 2.51 5.20--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 58 82 45 100 122 407

31.52 31.06 34.35 35.84 37.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 184 264 131 279 327 1185

15.53 22.28 11.05 23.54 27.59============================================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

252

Page 254: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 134 58 71 10 0 4 4 281

18.77 37.91 26.10 50.00 0.00 30.77 26.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 326 9 43 1 3 1 4 387

45.66 5.88 15.81 5.00 75.00 7.69 26.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 25 3 16 1 1 0 5 51

3.50 1.96 5.88 5.00 25.00 0.00 33.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 39 11 15 0 0 0 0 65

5.46 7.19 5.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 190 72 127 8 0 8 2 407

26.61 47.06 46.69 40.00 0.00 61.54 13.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 714 153 272 20 4 13 15 1191

59.95 12.85 22.84 1.68 0.34 1.09 1.26============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

253

Page 255: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 127 2 53 14 67 18 281

19.84 8.33 34.87 21.54 26.59 31.58--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 257 5 41 32 42 8 385

40.16 20.83 26.97 49.23 16.67 14.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 39 0 3 0 8 1 51

6.09 0.00 1.97 0.00 3.17 1.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 33 3 6 2 16 6 66

5.16 12.50 3.95 3.08 6.35 10.53--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 184 14 49 17 119 24 407

28.75 58.33 32.24 26.15 47.22 42.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 640 24 152 65 252 57 1190

53.78 2.02 12.77 5.46 21.18 4.79======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 134 146 280

24.06 23.06----------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 195 191 386

35.01 30.17----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

254

Page 256: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Rocky Palmquist 33 19 525.92 3.00

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 34 31 65

6.10 4.90----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 161 246 407

28.90 38.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 557 633 1190

46.81 53.19============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 113 130 37 280

31.83 22.11 15.16--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 75 202 109 386

21.13 34.35 44.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 16 28 8 52

4.51 4.76 3.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 22 37 6 65

6.20 6.29 2.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 129 191 84 404

36.34 32.48 34.43

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

255

Page 257: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 355 588 244 1187

29.91 49.54 20.56======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 64 86 18 46 66 280

26.02 23.37 14.75 42.99 19.02--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 68 114 39 16 149 386

27.64 30.98 31.97 14.95 42.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 11 12 11 5 13 52

4.47 3.26 9.02 4.67 3.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 14 26 4 10 11 65

5.69 7.07 3.28 9.35 3.17--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 89 130 50 30 108 407

36.18 35.33 40.98 28.04 31.12--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 246 368 122 107 347 1190

20.67 30.92 10.25 8.99 29.16============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

256

Page 258: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 30 85 124 41 280

15.31 27.33 27.02 18.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 38 66 169 113 386

19.39 21.22 36.82 50.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 11 15 22 4 52

5.61 4.82 4.79 1.78-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 22 17 15 12 66

11.22 5.47 3.27 5.33-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 95 128 129 55 407

48.47 41.16 28.10 24.44-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 196 311 459 225 1191

16.46 26.11 38.54 18.89===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

257

Page 259: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q20. 2014 Railroad Commission Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 0 1 6 42 43 139 145 376

0.00 0.96 6.32 11.80 34.68 61.23 67.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 38 67 54 101 8 9 10 287

62.30 64.42 56.84 28.37 6.45 3.96 4.63--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

258

Page 260: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Mark Miller 2 3 3 18 15 19 14 743.28 2.88 3.16 5.06 12.10 8.37 6.48

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 8 7 6 19 3 1 6 50

13.11 6.73 6.32 5.34 2.42 0.44 2.78--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 13 26 26 176 55 59 41 396

21.31 25.00 27.37 49.44 44.35 25.99 18.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 61 104 95 356 124 227 216 1183

5.16 8.79 8.03 30.09 10.48 19.19 18.26============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 7 42 327 376

2.71 11.80 57.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 158 101 27 286

61.24 28.37 4.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 8 18 48 74

3.10 5.06 8.45--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 21 19 11 51

8.14 5.34 1.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 64 176 155 395

24.81 49.44 27.29

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

259

Page 261: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 258 356 568 1182

21.83 30.12 48.05==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 3 4 4 18 64 59 215 367

1.18 3.60 3.45 16.22 53.78 47.97 72.64-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 166 47 55 6 5 4 2 285

65.35 42.34 47.41 5.41 4.20 3.25 0.68-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 8 5 5 14 12 11 15 70

3.15 4.50 4.31 12.61 10.08 8.94 5.07-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 9 5 13 5 4 4 5 45

3.54 4.50 11.21 4.50 3.36 3.25 1.69-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 68 50 39 68 34 45 59 363

26.77 45.05 33.62 61.26 28.57 36.59 19.93-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 111 116 111 119 123 296 1130

22.48 9.82 10.27 9.82 10.53 10.88 26.19=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

260

Page 262: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 11 18 339 368

2.29 16.22 62.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 268 6 11 285

55.72 5.41 2.04----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 18 14 38 70

3.74 12.61 7.05----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 27 5 14 46

5.61 4.50 2.60----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 157 68 137 362

32.64 61.26 25.42----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 481 111 539 1131

42.53 9.81 47.66====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 123 7 184 65 379

51.90 1.56 69.96 27.66

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

261

Page 263: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 7 268 5 7 287

2.95 59.82 1.90 2.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 21 17 24 11 73

8.86 3.79 9.13 4.68--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 9 29 4 8 50

3.80 6.47 1.52 3.40--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 77 127 46 144 394

32.49 28.35 17.49 61.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 237 448 263 235 1183

20.03 37.87 22.23 19.86============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 9 103 109 30 88 40 379

21.95 29.51 33.44 26.55 35.63 36.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 3 75 70 30 67 42 287

7.32 21.49 21.47 26.55 27.13 37.84---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 5 18 18 7 15 11 74

12.20 5.16 5.52 6.19 6.07 9.91---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 3 16 11 11 8 2 51

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

262

Page 264: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

7.32 4.58 3.37 9.73 3.24 1.80---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 21 137 118 35 69 16 396

51.22 39.26 36.20 30.97 27.94 14.41---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 349 326 113 247 111 1187

3.45 29.40 27.46 9.52 20.81 9.35=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 79 124 39 68 67 377

42.93 47.33 30.00 24.29 20.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 33 35 33 85 102 288

17.93 13.36 25.38 30.36 31.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 9 16 11 21 14 71

4.89 6.11 8.46 7.50 4.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 2 12 9 11 16 50

1.09 4.58 6.92 3.93 4.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 61 75 38 95 126 395

33.15 28.63 29.23 33.93 38.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 184 262 130 280 325 1181

15.58 22.18 11.01 23.71 27.52============================================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

263

Page 265: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 320 2 44 2 4 2 5 379

44.94 1.31 16.48 9.09 100.00 16.67 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 142 63 69 9 0 1 4 288

19.94 41.18 25.84 40.91 0.00 8.33 28.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 40 10 17 2 0 0 3 72

5.62 6.54 6.37 9.09 0.00 0.00 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 17 8 22 1 0 2 0 50

2.39 5.23 8.24 4.55 0.00 16.67 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 193 70 115 8 0 7 2 395

27.11 45.75 43.07 36.36 0.00 58.33 14.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 712 153 267 22 4 12 14 1184

60.14 12.92 22.55 1.86 0.34 1.01 1.18============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

264

Page 266: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 262 3 36 31 39 7 378

40.81 15.00 23.84 47.69 15.54 12.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 125 2 61 8 77 15 288

19.47 10.00 40.40 12.31 30.68 26.32--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 46 0 5 2 18 3 74

7.17 0.00 3.31 3.08 7.17 5.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 31 0 4 4 7 5 51

4.83 0.00 2.65 6.15 2.79 8.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 178 15 45 20 110 27 395

27.73 75.00 29.80 30.77 43.82 47.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 642 20 151 65 251 57 1186

54.13 1.69 12.73 5.48 21.16 4.81======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 195 184 379

35.14 29.16----------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 144 143 287

25.95 22.66----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

265

Page 267: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Mark Miller 46 28 748.29 4.44

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 19 31 50

3.42 4.91----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 151 245 396

27.21 38.83----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 555 631 1186

46.80 53.20============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 72 202 104 378

20.34 34.59 42.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 129 131 28 288

36.44 22.43 11.48--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 19 43 12 74

5.37 7.36 4.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 13 28 8 49

3.67 4.79 3.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 121 180 92 393

34.18 30.82 37.70

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

266

Page 268: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 354 584 244 1182

29.95 49.41 20.64======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 69 105 42 20 142 378

27.94 28.69 35.29 18.87 40.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 63 84 25 42 74 288

25.51 22.95 21.01 39.62 21.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 12 33 7 8 14 74

4.86 9.02 5.88 7.55 4.03--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 8 20 6 9 7 50

3.24 5.46 5.04 8.49 2.02--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 95 124 39 27 110 395

38.46 33.88 32.77 25.47 31.70--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 247 366 119 106 347 1185

20.84 30.89 10.04 8.95 29.28============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

267

Page 269: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 33 70 166 110 379

16.67 22.80 36.32 49.33-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 39 82 118 48 287

19.70 26.71 25.82 21.52-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 21 20 28 5 74

10.61 6.51 6.13 2.24-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 13 10 19 8 50

6.57 3.26 4.16 3.59-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 92 125 126 52 395

46.46 40.72 27.57 23.32-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 307 457 223 1185

16.71 25.91 38.57 18.82===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

268

Page 270: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q21. 2014 Generic Texas Legislature Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 55 91 77 181 17 17 21 459

88.71 88.35 79.38 50.28 13.71 7.33 9.72--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 2 0 11 78 73 200 184 548

3.23 0.00 11.34 21.67 58.87 86.21 85.19--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

269

Page 271: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Haven't thought about it enoug 5 12 9 101 34 15 11 1878.06 11.65 9.28 28.06 27.42 6.47 5.09

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 97 360 124 232 216 1194

5.19 8.63 8.12 30.15 10.39 19.43 18.09============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 223 181 55 459

84.79 50.28 9.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 14 78 457 549

5.32 21.67 79.90--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 26 101 60 187

9.89 28.06 10.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 360 572 1195

22.01 30.13 47.87==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

270

Page 272: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 236 94 101 16 3 3 0 453

92.55 82.46 84.87 14.16 2.48 2.42 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 3 3 5 34 103 100 289 537

1.18 2.63 4.20 30.09 85.12 80.65 96.98-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 16 17 13 63 15 21 9 154

6.27 14.91 10.92 55.75 12.40 16.94 3.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 114 119 113 121 124 298 1144

22.29 9.97 10.40 9.88 10.58 10.84 26.05=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 431 16 7 454

88.32 14.16 1.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 11 34 492 537

2.25 30.09 90.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 46 63 45 154

9.43 55.75 8.27----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 113 544 1145

42.62 9.87 47.51====================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

271

Page 273: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 8 429 4 17 458

3.32 94.91 1.50 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 214 5 242 90 551

88.80 1.11 90.98 37.82--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 19 18 20 131 188

7.88 3.98 7.52 55.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 452 266 238 1197

20.13 37.76 22.22 19.88============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 10 122 121 52 103 51 459

25.00 34.66 36.45 46.02 42.04 44.74---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 25 156 147 48 116 58 550

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

272

Page 274: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

62.50 44.32 44.28 42.48 47.35 50.88---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 5 74 64 13 26 5 187

12.50 21.02 19.28 11.50 10.61 4.39---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 352 332 113 245 114 1196

3.34 29.43 27.76 9.45 20.48 9.53=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 54 68 53 125 159 459

29.03 25.56 40.15 44.33 48.48--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 106 165 62 112 101 546

56.99 62.03 46.97 39.72 30.79--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 26 33 17 45 68 189

13.98 12.41 12.88 15.96 20.73--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 186 266 132 282 328 1194

15.58 22.28 11.06 23.62 27.47============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

273

Page 275: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 188 130 118 14 0 6 3 459

26.15 84.42 43.38 63.64 0.00 46.15 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 434 4 87 7 4 4 11 551

60.36 2.60 31.99 31.82 100.00 30.77 78.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 97 20 67 1 0 3 0 188

13.49 12.99 24.63 4.55 0.00 23.08 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 719 154 272 22 4 13 14 1198

60.02 12.85 22.70 1.84 0.33 1.09 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 204 6 73 15 133 29 460

31.48 26.09 48.34 23.08 52.36 50.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 355 11 56 38 81 9 550

54.78 47.83 37.09 58.46 31.89 15.79--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 89 6 22 12 40 19 188

13.73 26.09 14.57 18.46 15.75 33.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 23 151 65 254 57 1198

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

274

Page 276: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

54.09 1.92 12.60 5.43 21.20 4.76======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 215 244 459

38.26 38.30----------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 272 279 551

48.40 43.80----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 75 114 189

13.35 17.90----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 562 637 1199

46.87 53.13============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 189 219 51 459

52.94 37.18 20.56

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

275

Page 277: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 112 282 156 550

31.37 47.88 62.90--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 56 88 41 185

15.69 14.94 16.53--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 589 248 1194

29.90 49.33 20.77======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 99 149 40 70 102 460

39.76 40.49 32.52 64.81 29.06--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 114 155 59 23 200 551

45.78 42.12 47.97 21.30 56.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 36 64 24 15 49 188

14.46 17.39 19.51 13.89 13.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 249 368 123 108 351 1199

20.77 30.69 10.26 9.01 29.27============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

276

Page 278: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 91 125 183 61 460

45.96 39.81 39.70 26.99-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 67 124 220 140 551

33.84 39.49 47.72 61.95-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 40 65 58 25 188

20.20 20.70 12.58 11.06-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 461 226 1199

16.51 26.19 38.45 18.85===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

277

Page 279: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q22. Tea Party Support

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 2 0 10 53 46 76 52 239

3.23 0.00 10.31 14.72 37.10 32.76 23.96----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 56 91 80 173 19 14 21 454

90.32 88.35 82.47 48.06 15.32 6.03 9.68----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

278

Page 280: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Tea Party candidate 0 1 0 24 24 104 112 2650.00 0.97 0.00 6.67 19.35 44.83 51.61

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 11 7 110 35 38 32 237

6.45 10.68 7.22 30.56 28.23 16.38 14.75----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 97 360 124 232 217 1195

5.19 8.62 8.12 30.13 10.38 19.41 18.16==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 12 53 174 239

4.58 14.72 30.37--------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 227 173 54 454

86.64 48.06 9.42--------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 1 24 240 265

0.38 6.67 41.88--------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 22 110 105 237

8.40 30.56 18.32--------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 360 573 1195

21.92 30.13 47.95====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

279

Page 281: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 4 7 1 15 19 56 131 233

1.56 6.09 0.85 13.27 15.70 45.16 43.96-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 237 88 103 12 3 5 0 448

92.58 76.52 87.29 10.62 2.48 4.03 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 0 1 0 32 67 37 124 261

0.00 0.87 0.00 28.32 55.37 29.84 41.61-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 15 19 14 54 32 26 43 203

5.86 16.52 11.86 47.79 26.45 20.97 14.43-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 115 118 113 121 124 298 1145

22.36 10.04 10.31 9.87 10.57 10.83 26.03===============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 12 15 206 233

2.45 13.27 37.94----------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

280

Page 282: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Democratic candidate 428 12 8 44887.53 10.62 1.47

----------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 1 32 229 262

0.20 28.32 42.17----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 48 54 100 202

9.82 47.79 18.42----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 489 113 543 1145

42.71 9.87 47.42======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 241 0 0 0 241

100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 0 454 0 0 454

0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 0 0 266 0 266

0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 0 0 238 238

0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 454 266 238 1199

20.10 37.86 22.19 19.85

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

281

Page 283: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==============================================================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 8 90 67 16 33 28 242

19.51 25.50 20.18 14.04 13.41 24.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 14 118 119 53 103 47 454

34.15 33.43 35.84 46.49 41.87 40.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 10 68 70 22 72 25 267

24.39 19.26 21.08 19.30 29.27 21.74---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 9 77 76 23 38 15 238

21.95 21.81 22.89 20.18 15.45 13.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 353 332 114 246 115 1201

3.41 29.39 27.64 9.49 20.48 9.58=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

282

Page 284: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Republican candidate 48 68 27 55 42 24025.53 25.66 20.45 19.50 12.80

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 55 57 54 128 161 455

29.26 21.51 40.91 45.39 49.09------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 44 86 30 45 58 263

23.40 32.45 22.73 15.96 17.68------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 41 54 21 54 67 237

21.81 20.38 15.91 19.15 20.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 265 132 282 328 1195

15.73 22.18 11.05 23.60 27.45========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 165 3 65 5 0 2 0 240

22.98 1.92 23.90 23.81 0.00 14.29 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 195 126 114 12 0 5 3 455

27.16 80.77 41.91 57.14 0.00 35.71 21.43-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 208 4 35 2 3 3 10 265

28.97 2.56 12.87 9.52 100.00 21.43 71.43-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 150 23 58 2 0 4 1 238

20.89 14.74 21.32 9.52 0.00 28.57 7.14

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

283

Page 285: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 156 272 21 3 14 14 1198

59.93 13.02 22.70 1.75 0.25 1.17 1.17=========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 135 10 27 18 46 4 240

20.83 43.48 17.88 27.69 18.04 7.02--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 200 6 79 13 131 26 455

30.86 26.09 52.32 20.00 51.37 45.61--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 189 2 22 12 33 9 267

29.17 8.70 14.57 18.46 12.94 15.79--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 124 5 23 22 45 18 237

19.14 21.74 15.23 33.85 17.65 31.58--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 23 151 65 255 57 1199

54.05 1.92 12.59 5.42 21.27 4.75========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

284

Page 286: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

genderQ Male Female Total----------------------------------------------Republican candidate 98 143 241

17.47 22.38----------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 207 248 455

36.90 38.81----------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 181 85 266

32.26 13.30----------------------------------------------Don't know 75 163 238

13.37 25.51----------------------------------------------Total 561 639 1200

46.75 53.25==============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 62 111 67 240

17.42 18.81 27.02--------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 180 222 52 454

50.56 37.63 20.97--------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 53 150 62 265

14.89 25.42 25.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

285

Page 287: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------Don't know 61 107 67 235

17.13 18.14 27.02--------------------------------------------------------Total 356 590 248 1194

29.82 49.41 20.77========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 56 66 29 17 73 241

22.31 17.98 23.77 15.89 20.80---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 100 156 35 60 103 454

39.84 42.51 28.69 56.07 29.34---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 50 77 27 18 94 266

19.92 20.98 22.13 16.82 26.78---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 45 68 31 12 81 237

17.93 18.53 25.41 11.21 23.08---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 367 122 107 351 1198

20.95 30.63 10.18 8.93 29.30===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

286

Page 288: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 43 65 81 52 241

21.83 20.70 17.57 22.91-------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 86 126 180 63 455

43.65 40.13 39.05 27.75-------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 23 55 127 60 265

11.68 17.52 27.55 26.43-------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 45 68 73 52 238

22.84 21.66 15.84 22.91-------------------------------------------------------------Total 197 314 461 227 1199

16.43 26.19 38.45 18.93=============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

287

Page 289: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q23. Tea Party Influence

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 44 78 63 135 29 19 16 384

69.84 75.00 64.95 37.40 23.39 8.23 7.44-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 6 6 10 43 34 122 110 331

9.52 5.77 10.31 11.91 27.42 52.81 51.16-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

288

Page 290: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

The right amount of influence 5 5 11 78 35 67 54 2557.94 4.81 11.34 21.61 28.23 29.00 25.12

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 15 13 105 26 23 35 225

12.70 14.42 13.40 29.09 20.97 9.96 16.28-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 104 97 361 124 231 215 1195

5.27 8.70 8.12 30.21 10.38 19.33 17.99===========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 185 135 64 384

70.34 37.40 11.21-----------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 21 43 267 331

7.98 11.91 46.76-----------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 21 78 156 255

7.98 21.61 27.32-----------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 36 105 84 225

13.69 29.09 14.71-----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 361 571 1195

22.01 30.21 47.78=============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

289

Page 291: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 161 56 93 20 9 23 15 377

62.89 49.56 78.15 17.86 7.44 18.55 5.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 17 15 9 27 64 51 143 326

6.64 13.27 7.56 24.11 52.89 41.13 48.15--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 31 16 9 29 36 28 96 245

12.11 14.16 7.56 25.89 29.75 22.58 32.32--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 47 26 8 36 12 22 43 194

18.36 23.01 6.72 32.14 9.92 17.74 14.48--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 113 119 112 121 124 297 1142

22.42 9.89 10.42 9.81 10.60 10.86 26.01========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 310 20 47 377

63.39 17.86 8.67-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

290

Page 292: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Too little influence 41 27 258 3268.38 24.11 47.60

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 56 29 160 245

11.45 25.89 29.52-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 82 36 77 195

16.77 32.14 14.21-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 489 112 542 1143

42.78 9.80 47.42===============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 48 314 0 22 384

19.92 69.16 0.00 9.24-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 45 38 208 42 333

18.67 8.37 78.49 17.65-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 89 50 55 61 255

36.93 11.01 20.75 25.63-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 59 52 2 113 226

24.48 11.45 0.75 47.48-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 454 265 238 1198

20.12 37.90 22.12 19.87

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

291

Page 293: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=======================================================================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 6 84 97 42 94 61 384

15.00 23.93 29.22 36.84 38.06 53.98------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 16 82 95 36 72 31 332

40.00 23.36 28.61 31.58 29.15 27.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 7 93 60 23 54 18 255

17.50 26.50 18.07 20.18 21.86 15.93------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 11 92 80 13 27 3 226

27.50 26.21 24.10 11.40 10.93 2.65------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 351 332 114 247 113 1197

3.34 29.32 27.74 9.52 20.63 9.44==================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

292

Page 294: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Too much influence 38 60 37 113 137 38520.11 22.64 28.03 40.21 41.64

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 56 99 36 62 76 329

29.63 37.36 27.27 22.06 23.10---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 48 59 36 65 47 255

25.40 22.26 27.27 23.13 14.29---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 47 47 23 41 69 227

24.87 17.74 17.42 14.59 20.97---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 189 265 132 281 329 1196

15.80 22.16 11.04 23.49 27.51=================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~AC Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 212 76 79 7 0 7 3 384

29.57 49.03 29.04 33.33 0.00 53.85 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 240 14 60 4 3 3 9 333

33.47 9.03 22.06 19.05 75.00 23.08 64.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 148 25 67 10 1 2 1 254

20.64 16.13 24.63 47.62 25.00 15.38 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 117 40 66 0 0 1 1 225

16.32 25.81 24.26 0.00 0.00 7.69 7.14

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

293

Page 295: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 717 155 272 21 4 13 14 1196

59.95 12.96 22.74 1.76 0.33 1.09 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 184 3 66 13 94 24 384

28.40 12.50 44.00 20.00 37.01 42.11-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 222 6 31 20 43 10 332

34.26 25.00 20.67 30.77 16.93 17.54-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 141 4 21 19 61 9 255

21.76 16.67 14.00 29.23 24.02 15.79-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 101 11 32 13 56 14 227

15.59 45.83 21.33 20.00 22.05 24.56-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 24 150 65 254 57 1198

54.09 2.00 12.52 5.43 21.20 4.76=================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

294

Page 296: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

genderQ Male Female Total-------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 183 201 384

32.62 31.60-------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 183 149 332

32.62 23.43-------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 135 120 255

24.06 18.87-------------------------------------------------------Don't know 60 166 226

10.70 26.10-------------------------------------------------------Total 561 636 1197

46.87 53.13=======================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total-----------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 139 193 51 383

39.04 32.71 20.65-----------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 78 173 81 332

21.91 29.32 32.79-----------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 61 136 58 255

17.13 23.05 23.48

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

295

Page 297: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 78 88 57 223

21.91 14.92 23.08-----------------------------------------------------------------Total 356 590 247 1193

29.84 49.46 20.70=================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 89 125 30 56 83 383

35.60 34.06 24.59 52.34 23.71------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 68 97 36 13 117 331

27.20 26.43 29.51 12.15 33.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 51 73 30 22 81 257

20.40 19.89 24.59 20.56 23.14------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 42 72 26 16 69 225

16.80 19.62 21.31 14.95 19.71------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 367 122 107 350 1196

20.90 30.69 10.20 8.95 29.26====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

296

Page 298: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

======================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 51 98 168 67 384

25.76 31.21 36.52 29.52----------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 44 65 150 73 332

22.22 20.70 32.61 32.16----------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 43 71 87 55 256

21.72 22.61 18.91 24.23----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 60 80 55 32 227

30.30 25.48 11.96 14.10----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 460 227 1199

16.51 26.19 38.37 18.93======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

297

Page 299: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q25. 2016 Republican Presidential Primary Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 0 0 2 12 11 66 84 175

0.00 0.00 18.18 20.34 14.10 32.84 46.15--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 1 0 0 5 4 17 13 40

33.33 0.00 0.00 8.47 5.13 8.46 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

298

Page 300: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Rand Paul 0 0 0 6 7 22 13 480.00 0.00 0.00 10.17 8.97 10.95 7.14

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 0 1 0 6 10 9 10 36

0.00 100.00 0.00 10.17 12.82 4.48 5.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 0 0 0 8 12 11 6 37

0.00 0.00 0.00 13.56 15.38 5.47 3.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 0 0 0 3 2 2 4 11

0.00 0.00 0.00 5.08 2.56 1.00 2.20--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 0 0 0 0 3 10 8 21

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.85 4.98 4.40--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 0 0 0 1 3 22 3 29

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.69 3.85 10.95 1.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 0 0 2 3 2 10 0 17

0.00 0.00 18.18 5.08 2.56 4.98 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 2 0 0 1 1 1 3 8

66.67 0.00 0.00 1.69 1.28 0.50 1.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 0 0 7 2 7 10 19 45

0.00 0.00 63.64 3.39 8.97 4.98 10.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about i 0 0 0 12 16 21 19 68

0.00 0.00 0.00 20.34 20.51 10.45 10.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 3 1 11 59 78 201 182 535

0.56 0.19 2.06 11.03 14.58 37.57 34.02============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

299

Page 301: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 2 12 160 174

13.33 20.34 34.78--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 1 5 34 40

6.67 8.47 7.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 0 6 42 48

0.00 10.17 9.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 1 6 28 35

6.67 10.17 6.09--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 0 8 29 37

0.00 13.56 6.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 0 3 9 12

0.00 5.08 1.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 0 0 21 21

0.00 0.00 4.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 0 1 29 30

0.00 1.69 6.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 2 3 11 16

13.33 5.08 2.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 2 1 5 8

13.33 1.69 1.09

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

300

Page 302: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 7 2 36 45

46.67 3.39 7.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 0 12 56 68

0.00 20.34 12.17--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 15 59 460 534

2.81 11.05 86.14==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 0 0 1 6 43 25 96 171

0.00 0.00 20.00 21.43 43.43 24.51 33.57-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 0 1 0 0 5 8 26 40

0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 5.05 7.84 9.09-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 0 0 0 8 16 7 16 47

0.00 0.00 0.00 28.57 16.16 6.86 5.59-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 1 1 0 2 4 7 19 34

25.00 50.00 0.00 7.14 4.04 6.86 6.64-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 0 0 0 0 4 13 20 37

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.04 12.75 6.99-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 0 0 0 0 2 0 9 11

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

301

Page 303: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.02 0.00 3.15-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 1 0 0 0 3 7 11 22

25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.03 6.86 3.85-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 0 0 1 0 2 3 24 30

0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 2.02 2.94 8.39-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 0 0 1 1 0 5 7 14

0.00 0.00 20.00 3.57 0.00 4.90 2.45-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 0 0 0 2 0 4 2 8

0.00 0.00 0.00 7.14 0.00 3.92 0.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 2 0 0 3 8 6 25 44

50.00 0.00 0.00 10.71 8.08 5.88 8.74-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 0 0 2 6 12 17 31 68

0.00 0.00 40.00 21.43 12.12 16.67 10.84-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 4 2 5 28 99 102 286 526

0.76 0.38 0.95 5.32 18.82 19.39 54.37=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 1 6 164 171

9.09 21.43 33.74----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

302

Page 304: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Rick Perry 1 0 39 409.09 0.00 8.02

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 0 8 39 47

0.00 28.57 8.02----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 2 2 30 34

18.18 7.14 6.17----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 0 0 37 37

0.00 0.00 7.61----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 0 0 12 12

0.00 0.00 2.47----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 1 0 21 22

9.09 0.00 4.32----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 1 0 28 29

9.09 0.00 5.76----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 1 1 13 15

9.09 3.57 2.67----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 0 2 5 7

0.00 7.14 1.03----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 2 3 39 44

18.18 10.71 8.02----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 2 6 59 67

18.18 21.43 12.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 11 28 486 525

2.10 5.33 92.57====================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

303

Page 305: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 35 0 119 22 176

17.33 0.00 50.00 24.72--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 28 0 3 9 40

13.86 0.00 1.26 10.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 7 0 36 5 48

3.47 0.00 15.13 5.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 18 1 11 5 35

8.91 12.50 4.62 5.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 26 2 3 7 38

12.87 25.00 1.26 7.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 5 0 7 0 12

2.48 0.00 2.94 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 4 0 14 3 21

1.98 0.00 5.88 3.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 17 0 10 2 29

8.42 0.00 4.20 2.25--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 15 1 0 0 16

7.43 12.50 0.00 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

304

Page 306: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 4 0 1 2 7

1.98 0.00 0.42 2.25--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 17 2 20 7 46

8.42 25.00 8.40 7.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 26 2 14 27 69

12.87 25.00 5.88 30.34--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 202 8 238 89 537

37.62 1.49 44.32 16.57============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 5 43 49 21 44 15 177

38.46 27.74 31.61 47.73 37.93 28.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 2 11 14 3 7 2 39

15.38 7.10 9.03 6.82 6.03 3.77---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 1 8 11 6 15 7 48

7.69 5.16 7.10 13.64 12.93 13.21---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 0 7 14 2 6 4 33

0.00 4.52 9.03 4.55 5.17 7.55---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 1 12 12 3 9 1 38

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

305

Page 307: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

7.69 7.74 7.74 6.82 7.76 1.89---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 0 5 3 1 1 2 12

0.00 3.23 1.94 2.27 0.86 3.77---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 1 9 5 1 4 0 20

7.69 5.81 3.23 2.27 3.45 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 1 10 4 0 6 8 29

7.69 6.45 2.58 0.00 5.17 15.09---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 0 8 2 0 1 6 17

0.00 5.16 1.29 0.00 0.86 11.32---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 0 3 1 2 2 0 8

0.00 1.94 0.65 4.55 1.72 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 1 17 14 2 8 4 46

7.69 10.97 9.03 4.55 6.90 7.55---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 1 22 26 3 13 4 69

7.69 14.19 16.77 6.82 11.21 7.55---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 13 155 155 44 116 53 536

2.43 28.92 28.92 8.21 21.64 9.89=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

306

Page 308: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Ted Cruz 31 56 18 37 35 17729.52 34.78 30.00 33.33 35.71

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 6 13 5 11 4 39

5.71 8.07 8.33 9.91 4.08--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 11 9 6 10 9 45

10.48 5.59 10.00 9.01 9.18--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 4 10 6 4 12 36

3.81 6.21 10.00 3.60 12.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 3 8 6 11 9 37

2.86 4.97 10.00 9.91 9.18--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 3 2 0 5 1 11

2.86 1.24 0.00 4.50 1.02--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 5 7 3 2 5 22

4.76 4.35 5.00 1.80 5.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 6 13 1 9 0 29

5.71 8.07 1.67 8.11 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 6 7 0 0 4 17

5.71 4.35 0.00 0.00 4.08--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 2 4 0 1 1 8

1.90 2.48 0.00 0.90 1.02--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 11 19 2 6 7 45

10.48 11.80 3.33 5.41 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have 17 13 13 15 11 69

16.19 8.07 21.67 13.51 11.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

307

Page 309: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Total 105 161 60 111 98 53519.63 30.09 11.21 20.75 18.32

============================================================================================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 141 0 23 2 3 2 6 177

32.64 NaN 27.38 50.00 75.00 66.67 60.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 32 0 8 0 0 0 0 40

7.41 NaN 9.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 39 0 5 0 1 1 3 49

9.03 NaN 5.95 0.00 25.00 33.33 30.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 29 0 5 0 0 0 0 34

6.71 NaN 5.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 31 0 7 0 0 0 0 38

7.18 NaN 8.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 12

1.39 NaN 7.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 19 0 2 0 0 0 0 21

4.40 NaN 2.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 27 0 2 0 0 0 0 29

6.25 NaN 2.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

308

Page 310: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 7 0 9 0 0 0 0 16

1.62 NaN 10.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 8

0.93 NaN 4.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 40 0 4 1 0 0 0 45

9.26 NaN 4.76 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to 57 0 9 1 0 0 1 68

13.19 NaN 10.71 25.00 0.00 0.00 10.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 432 0 84 4 4 3 10 537

80.45 0.00 15.64 0.74 0.74 0.56 1.86============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 121 0 21 7 22 5 176

33.80 0.00 38.18 20.59 29.73 55.56--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 23 1 5 4 7 0 40

6.42 12.50 9.09 11.76 9.46 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 37 1 4 1 5 0 48

10.34 12.50 7.27 2.94 6.76 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 19 0 6 5 3 1 34

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

309

Page 311: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

5.31 0.00 10.91 14.71 4.05 11.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 25 3 3 5 2 1 39

6.98 37.50 5.45 14.71 2.70 11.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 7 0 0 0 5 0 12

1.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.76 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 12 0 1 1 5 2 21

3.35 0.00 1.82 2.94 6.76 22.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 20 0 2 4 4 0 30

5.59 0.00 3.64 11.76 5.41 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 9 0 0 0 8 0 17

2.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.81 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 5 0 2 1 0 0 8

1.40 0.00 3.64 2.94 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 28 2 5 4 6 0 45

7.82 25.00 9.09 11.76 8.11 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 52 1 6 2 7 0 68

14.53 12.50 10.91 5.88 9.46 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 358 8 55 34 74 9 538

66.54 1.49 10.22 6.32 13.75 1.67======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

310

Page 312: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

genderQ Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 103 73 176

37.73 27.65----------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 13 27 40

4.76 10.23----------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 33 15 48

12.09 5.68----------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 18 17 35

6.59 6.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 9 29 38

3.30 10.98----------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 7 4 11

2.56 1.52----------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 15 6 21

5.49 2.27----------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 14 16 30

5.13 6.06----------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 12 5 17

4.40 1.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 2 5 7

0.73 1.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 23 22 45

8.42 8.33----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

311

Page 313: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 24 45 698.79 17.05

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 273 264 537

50.84 49.16============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 34 98 45 177

31.78 34.15 31.25--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 10 17 12 39

9.35 5.92 8.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 5 30 13 48

4.67 10.45 9.03--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 11 19 4 34

10.28 6.62 2.78--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 7 21 10 38

6.54 7.32 6.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 2 8 2 12

1.87 2.79 1.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 5 11 5 21

4.67 3.83 3.47

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

312

Page 314: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 7 10 13 30

6.54 3.48 9.03--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 8 8 0 16

7.48 2.79 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 2 4 2 8

1.87 1.39 1.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 4 22 20 46

3.74 7.67 13.89--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 12 39 18 69

11.21 13.59 12.50--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 107 287 144 538

19.89 53.35 26.77======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 35 55 20 1 65 176

33.98 34.16 32.26 3.70 34.95--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 10 12 6 1 11 40

9.71 7.45 9.68 3.70 5.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 6 8 9 8 17 48

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

313

Page 315: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

5.83 4.97 14.52 29.63 9.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 8 12 5 4 7 36

7.77 7.45 8.06 14.81 3.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 9 11 5 1 11 37

8.74 6.83 8.06 3.70 5.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 1 3 3 0 5 12

0.97 1.86 4.84 0.00 2.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 4 7 1 3 6 21

3.88 4.35 1.61 11.11 3.23--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 10 6 2 0 12 30

9.71 3.73 3.23 0.00 6.45--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 3 2 6 3 2 16

2.91 1.24 9.68 11.11 1.08--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 0 4 0 2 2 8

0.00 2.48 0.00 7.41 1.08--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 3 15 0 2 26 46

2.91 9.32 0.00 7.41 13.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to ha 14 26 5 2 22 69

13.59 16.15 8.06 7.41 11.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 103 161 62 27 186 539

19.11 29.87 11.50 5.01 34.51============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

314

Page 316: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 14 44 77 41 176

22.58 36.07 35.32 30.15-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 9 9 14 8 40

14.52 7.38 6.42 5.88-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 8 7 26 7 48

12.90 5.74 11.93 5.15-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 5 7 7 16 35

8.06 5.74 3.21 11.76-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 0 5 16 17 38

0.00 4.10 7.34 12.50-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 1 2 6 2 11

1.61 1.64 2.75 1.47-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 1 5 9 6 21

1.61 4.10 4.13 4.41-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 5 8 10 7 30

8.06 6.56 4.59 5.15-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 1 8 8 0 17

1.61 6.56 3.67 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 0 3 1 4 8

0.00 2.46 0.46 2.94-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

315

Page 317: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Mike Huckabee 11 8 16 11 4617.74 6.56 7.34 8.09

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 7 16 28 17 68

11.29 13.11 12.84 12.50-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 122 218 136 538

11.52 22.68 40.52 25.28===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

316

Page 318: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q26. 2016 Democratic Presidential Primary Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 24 65 41 116 9 8 8 271

46.15 78.31 67.21 65.54 60.00 53.33 47.06--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 3 2 4 19 0 4 1 33

5.77 2.41 6.56 10.73 0.00 26.67 5.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

317

Page 319: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Elizabeth Warren 22 12 10 17 1 0 2 6442.31 14.46 16.39 9.60 6.67 0.00 11.76

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 0 1 0 4 0 3 0 8

0.00 1.20 0.00 2.26 0.00 20.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 4

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.69 6.67 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about i 3 3 6 18 4 0 6 40

5.77 3.61 9.84 10.17 26.67 0.00 35.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 52 83 61 177 15 15 17 420

12.38 19.76 14.52 42.14 3.57 3.57 4.05============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 129 116 26 271

66.15 65.54 50.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 9 19 6 34

4.62 10.73 11.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 44 17 4 65

22.56 9.60 7.84

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

318

Page 320: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 1 4 3 8

0.51 2.26 5.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 0 3 1 4

0.00 1.69 1.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 12 18 11 41

6.15 10.17 21.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 195 177 51 423

46.10 41.84 12.06==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 156 54 47 2 2 4 1 266

66.38 62.79 64.38 20.00 50.00 100.00 33.33-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 17 9 4 3 0 0 1 34

7.23 10.47 5.48 30.00 0.00 0.00 33.33-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 37 10 16 0 1 0 0 64

15.74 11.63 21.92 0.00 25.00 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

319

Page 321: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 5 2 0 1 0 0 0 8

2.13 2.33 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 4

1.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 17 11 6 4 1 0 0 39

7.23 12.79 8.22 40.00 25.00 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 235 86 73 10 4 4 3 415

56.63 20.72 17.59 2.41 0.96 0.96 0.72=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 257 2 7 266

65.23 20.00 63.64----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 30 3 1 34

7.61 30.00 9.09----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 63 0 1 64

15.99 0.00 9.09----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

320

Page 322: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Andrew Cuomo 7 1 0 81.78 10.00 0.00

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 3 0 1 4

0.76 0.00 9.09----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 34 4 1 39

8.63 40.00 9.09----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 394 10 11 415

94.94 2.41 2.65====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 5 253 2 12 272

31.25 65.89 66.67 57.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 4 29 0 2 35

25.00 7.55 0.00 9.52--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 1 63 0 0 64

6.25 16.41 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 0 7 0 1 8

0.00 1.82 0.00 4.76

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

321

Page 323: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 4 0 0 0 4

25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 2 32 1 6 41

12.50 8.33 33.33 28.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 16 384 3 21 424

3.77 90.57 0.71 4.95============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 10 76 70 34 59 23 272

66.67 64.41 63.06 75.56 63.44 52.27---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 1 8 10 2 6 7 34

6.67 6.78 9.01 4.44 6.45 15.91---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 0 21 15 1 20 7 64

0.00 17.80 13.51 2.22 21.51 15.91---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 0 2 1 3 0 3 9

0.00 1.69 0.90 6.67 0.00 6.82---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 0 3 0 0 2 0 5

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

322

Page 324: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 2.54 0.00 0.00 2.15 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 4 8 15 5 6 4 42

26.67 6.78 13.51 11.11 6.45 9.09---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 15 118 111 45 93 44 426

3.52 27.70 26.06 10.56 21.83 10.33=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 33 41 35 76 88 273

67.35 62.12 72.92 66.09 60.27--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 7 6 5 5 11 34

14.29 9.09 10.42 4.35 7.53--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 4 6 2 22 30 64

8.16 9.09 4.17 19.13 20.55--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 3 3 1 1 0 8

6.12 4.55 2.08 0.87 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 0 4 0 0 0 4

0.00 6.06 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

323

Page 325: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Haven't thought enough about it to have 2 6 5 11 17 414.08 9.09 10.42 9.57 11.64

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 49 66 48 115 146 424

11.56 15.57 11.32 27.12 34.43============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 103 85 79 3 0 3 0 273

60.59 65.89 73.83 27.27 NaN 42.86 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 9 20 6 0 0 0 0 35

5.29 15.50 5.61 0.00 NaN 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 42 3 9 7 0 1 3 65

24.71 2.33 8.41 63.64 NaN 14.29 100.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NaN 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 8

1.76 2.33 1.87 0.00 NaN 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 4

0.00 0.00 2.80 9.09 NaN 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it t 13 18 8 0 0 3 0 42

7.65 13.95 7.48 0.00 NaN 42.86 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

324

Page 326: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 170 129 107 11 0 7 3 427

39.81 30.21 25.06 2.58 0.00 1.64 0.70============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 120 7 55 14 66 11 273

65.93 70.00 77.46 82.35 55.00 45.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 16 0 3 0 13 2 34

8.79 0.00 4.23 0.00 10.83 8.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 31 0 7 0 20 5 63

17.03 0.00 9.86 0.00 16.67 20.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 1 0 4 1 3 0 9

0.55 0.00 5.63 5.88 2.50 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 2 3 0 0 0 0 5

1.10 30.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 12 0 2 2 18 6 40

6.59 0.00 2.82 11.76 15.00 25.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 182 10 71 17 120 24 424

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

325

Page 327: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

42.92 2.36 16.75 4.01 28.30 5.66======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 118 154 272

60.51 67.54----------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 12 22 34

6.15 9.65----------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 38 26 64

19.49 11.40----------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0

0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 5 3 8

2.56 1.32----------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 0 4 4

0.00 1.75----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 22 19 41

11.28 8.33----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 195 228 423

46.10 53.90============================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

326

Page 328: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 117 127 29 273

66.86 63.82 58.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 11 19 4 34

6.29 9.55 8.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 23 31 10 64

13.14 15.58 20.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 1 6 1 8

0.57 3.02 2.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 3 0 1 4

1.71 0.00 2.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 20 16 5 41

11.43 8.04 10.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 175 199 50 424

41.27 46.93 11.79======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

327

Page 329: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 61 90 25 36 60 272

58.65 72.58 69.44 59.02 60.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 12 9 2 6 6 35

11.54 7.26 5.56 9.84 6.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 14 13 8 12 18 65

13.46 10.48 22.22 19.67 18.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 3 3 0 0 2 8

2.88 2.42 0.00 0.00 2.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 3 0 0 0 1 4

2.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to ha 11 9 1 7 13 41

10.58 7.26 2.78 11.48 13.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 104 124 36 61 100 425

24.47 29.18 8.47 14.35 23.53============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

328

Page 330: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 34 67 122 49 272

47.89 56.78 70.52 77.78-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 12 9 11 2 34

16.90 7.63 6.36 3.17-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 11 20 27 7 65

15.49 16.95 15.61 11.11-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 0 3 2 3 8

0.00 2.54 1.16 4.76-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 0 5 0 0 5

0.00 4.24 0.00 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 14 14 11 2 41

19.72 11.86 6.36 3.17-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 71 118 173 63 425

16.71 27.76 40.71 14.82===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

329

Page 331: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Political Figure Favorability Ratings

Q27. Ted Cruz Favorability

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 3 1 2 30 28 131 149 344

4.84 0.97 2.08 8.33 22.58 56.71 68.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 3 7 8 43 40 64 33 198

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

330

Page 332: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

4.84 6.80 8.33 11.94 32.26 27.71 15.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavora 2 2 4 61 15 16 13 113

3.23 1.94 4.17 16.94 12.10 6.93 6.02--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 3 4 7 40 10 6 5 75

4.84 3.88 7.29 11.11 8.06 2.60 2.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 43 76 65 118 20 8 5 335

69.35 73.79 67.71 32.78 16.13 3.46 2.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 8 13 10 68 11 6 11 127

12.90 12.62 10.42 18.89 8.87 2.60 5.09--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 96 360 124 231 216 1192

5.20 8.64 8.05 30.20 10.40 19.38 18.12============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 6 30 308 344

2.28 8.33 54.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 18 43 137 198

6.84 11.94 24.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 9 61 44 114

3.42 16.94 7.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

331

Page 333: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Somewhat unfavorable 14 40 21 755.32 11.11 3.68

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 185 118 33 336

70.34 32.78 5.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 31 68 27 126

11.79 18.89 4.74---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 360 570 1193

22.05 30.18 47.78=================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 8 2 0 21 74 40 194 339

3.16 1.75 0.00 18.75 62.18 32.26 65.32------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 19 19 4 21 26 37 61 187

7.51 16.67 3.36 18.75 21.85 29.84 20.54------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 24 15 7 25 6 12 17 106

9.49 13.16 5.88 22.32 5.04 9.68 5.72------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 19 18 8 4 3 14 8 74

7.51 15.79 6.72 3.57 2.52 11.29 2.69------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 152 48 92 18 5 6 8 329

60.08 42.11 77.31 16.07 4.20 4.84 2.69

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

332

Page 334: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 31 12 8 23 5 15 9 103

12.25 10.53 6.72 20.54 4.20 12.10 3.03------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 253 114 119 112 119 124 297 1138

22.23 10.02 10.46 9.84 10.46 10.90 26.10============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 10 21 309 340

2.06 18.75 56.91-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 42 21 125 188

8.64 18.75 23.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 46 25 36 107

9.47 22.32 6.63-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 45 4 25 74

9.26 3.57 4.60-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 292 18 19 329

60.08 16.07 3.50-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 51 23 29 103

10.49 20.54 5.34-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 112 543 1141

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

333

Page 335: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

42.59 9.82 47.59===================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 76 9 209 52 346

31.54 2.00 78.57 21.94---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 74 38 38 47 197

30.71 8.44 14.29 19.83---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 31 35 13 34 113

12.86 7.78 4.89 14.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 24 37 4 10 75

9.96 8.22 1.50 4.22---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 15 299 1 22 337

6.22 66.44 0.38 9.28---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 21 32 1 72 126

8.71 7.11 0.38 30.38---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 450 266 237 1194

20.18 37.69 22.28 19.85===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

334

Page 336: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 11 98 86 34 84 34 347

27.50 27.84 26.22 30.09 34.01 29.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 7 63 62 20 30 15 197

17.50 17.90 18.90 17.70 12.15 13.04----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 3 41 33 11 21 4 113

7.50 11.65 10.06 9.73 8.50 3.48----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 1 24 19 6 10 15 75

2.50 6.82 5.79 5.31 4.05 13.04----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 7 77 86 33 89 45 337

17.50 21.88 26.22 29.20 36.03 39.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 11 49 42 9 13 2 126

27.50 13.92 12.80 7.96 5.26 1.74----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 352 328 113 247 115 1195

3.35 29.46 27.45 9.46 20.67 9.62======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================attend

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

335

Page 337: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 77 104 33 67 62 343

40.74 39.25 25.19 23.67 19.08-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 32 48 38 47 32 197

16.93 18.11 29.01 16.61 9.85-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 17 26 12 34 25 114

8.99 9.81 9.16 12.01 7.69-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 12 19 9 19 16 75

6.35 7.17 6.87 6.71 4.92-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 29 40 28 93 147 337

15.34 15.09 21.37 32.86 45.23-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 22 28 11 23 43 127

11.64 10.57 8.40 8.13 13.23-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 189 265 131 283 325 1193

15.84 22.21 10.98 23.72 27.24=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA ge Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 276 7 46 4 3 2 9 347

38.44 4.61 16.85 18.18 100.00 15.38 60.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

336

Page 338: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Somewhat favorable 118 15 56 4 0 1 3 19716.43 9.87 20.51 18.18 0.00 7.69 20.00

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 51 22 28 8 0 4 0 113

7.10 14.47 10.26 36.36 0.00 30.77 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 35 19 16 3 0 2 0 75

4.87 12.50 5.86 13.64 0.00 15.38 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 189 61 78 2 0 4 3 337

26.32 40.13 28.57 9.09 0.00 30.77 20.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 49 28 49 1 0 0 0 127

6.82 18.42 17.95 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 152 273 22 3 13 15 1196

60.03 12.71 22.83 1.84 0.25 1.09 1.25============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 236 1 31 22 49 6 345

36.42 4.35 20.26 33.85 19.52 10.53---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 114 5 20 11 42 6 198

17.59 21.74 13.07 16.92 16.73 10.53---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 52 4 10 9 31 8 114

8.02 17.39 6.54 13.85 12.35 14.04

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

337

Page 339: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 37 3 10 6 16 3 75

5.71 13.04 6.54 9.23 6.37 5.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 156 3 74 16 66 23 338

24.07 13.04 48.37 24.62 26.29 40.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 53 7 8 1 47 11 127

8.18 30.43 5.23 1.54 18.73 19.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 23 153 65 251 57 1197

54.14 1.92 12.78 5.43 20.97 4.76=====================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 202 144 346

36.14 22.64-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 98 99 197

17.53 15.57-----------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 35 78 113

6.26 12.26-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 24 51 75

4.29 8.02-----------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 167 170 337

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

338

Page 340: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

29.87 26.73-----------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 33 94 127

5.90 14.78-----------------------------------------------------------Total 559 636 1195

46.78 53.22===========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 70 183 93 346

19.83 31.02 37.65---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 52 92 53 197

14.73 15.59 21.46---------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 38 56 18 112

10.76 9.49 7.29---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 23 40 11 74

6.52 6.78 4.45---------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 135 163 40 338

38.24 27.63 16.19---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 35 56 32 123

9.92 9.49 12.96---------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

339

Page 341: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Total 353 590 247 119029.66 49.58 20.76

=====================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 63 103 37 14 129 346

25.20 28.07 30.33 12.96 37.07----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 43 47 30 20 58 198

17.20 12.81 24.59 18.52 16.67----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 30 31 7 6 39 113

12.00 8.45 5.74 5.56 11.21----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 23 20 6 14 11 74

9.20 5.45 4.92 12.96 3.16----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 71 121 31 48 66 337

28.40 32.97 25.41 44.44 18.97----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 20 45 11 6 45 127

8.00 12.26 9.02 5.56 12.93----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 367 122 108 348 1195

20.92 30.71 10.21 9.04 29.12========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

340

Page 342: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 34 65 153 94 346

17.44 20.83 33.19 41.59--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 35 56 68 37 196

17.95 17.95 14.75 16.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 32 36 29 16 113

16.41 11.54 6.29 7.08--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 16 19 28 12 75

8.21 6.09 6.07 5.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 29 89 160 59 337

14.87 28.53 34.71 26.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 49 47 23 8 127

25.13 15.06 4.99 3.54--------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 195 312 461 226 1194

16.33 26.13 38.61 18.93==========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

341

Page 343: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q28. John Cornyn Favorability

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 5 2 2 16 17 53 55 150

7.94 1.94 2.06 4.47 13.71 22.84 25.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 3 8 6 58 43 85 70 273

4.76 7.77 6.19 16.20 34.68 36.64 32.41--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

342