Download - dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Transcript
Page 1: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

The University of Texas / Texas Tribune Poll Cross Tabulations

The Texas Politics Project at The University of Texas at Austin in Conjunction with the Texas Tribune

June 11, 2014

Page 2: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Contents

Political Habits 2Q2. Political Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2Q3. Voting Habit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

Texas Political Mood 25Q4. MIP Country . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25Q5. MIP State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61Q6. Obama Approval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98Q7. Congress Approval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110Q8. Rick Perry Approval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122Q9. Right Direction/Wrong Track, Country . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134Q10. National Economy: Better o↵/Worse O↵ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143Q11. Right Direction/Wrong Track, Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155Q12. Personal Economy: Better o↵/Worse o↵ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164

Elections 176Q13. 2014 Senate Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176Q14. 2014 Governor Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187Q15. 2014 Lieutenant Governor Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200Q16. 2014 Attorney General Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212Q17. 2014 Comptroller Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223Q18. 2014 Land Commissioner Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234Q19. 2014 Commissioner of Agriculture Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245Q20. 2014 Railroad Commission Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256Q21. 2014 Generic Texas Legislature Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 267Q22. Tea Party Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 276Q23. Tea Party Influence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 286Q25. 2016 Republican Presidential Primary Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 296Q26. 2016 Democratic Presidential Primary Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315

Political Figure Favorability Ratings 328Q27. Ted Cruz Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 328Q28. John Cornyn Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 340Q29. David Alameel Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 352

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

1

Page 3: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q30. Rick Perry Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 364Q31. Greg Abbott Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 376Q32. Wendy Davis Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 388Q33. Leticia Van de Putte Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 400Q34. Dan Patrick Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 412Q35A. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Public Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 424Q35B. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: The State Economy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 433Q35C. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Immigration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 442Q35D. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: The State Budget . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 451Q35E. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 460Q35F. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Ethics in Government . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 469Q35G. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Transportation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 478Q35H. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Higher Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 487

Policy Questions 496Q36A. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Creating a School Voucher Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 496Q36B. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Expanding the Number of Charter Schools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 507Q36C. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Increasing the Pay of Public School Teachers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 518Q36D. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Increasing Funding for the Public School System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 529Q36E. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Providing more incentives for individuals to choose teaching as a profession . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 540Q36F. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Reducing the number of standardized tests students must take . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 551Q36G. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Increasing opportunities for online learning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 562Q36H. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Establishing a state-wide pre-kindergarten program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 573Q36I. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Allowing more localized control over curriculum and standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 584Q37. MOST E↵ective Education Policy Proposal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 595Q38. Perceived Existence of Gender Gap in Pay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 610Q39. State’s Role in Addressing Gender Equality in the Workplace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 620Q40. Death Penalty Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 630Q41. Death Penalty Alternative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 641Q42. Life Sustaining Treatment for Pregnant Women . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 650Q43. A↵ordable Care Act Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 658Q44. A↵ordable Care Act Preference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 670Q45. In-State Tuition for Illegal Immigrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 681Q46A. Agree/Disagree: Most immigrants pay their fair share of taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 690Q46B. Agree/Disagree: We should restrict and control people coming to live in the U.S. more than we do now . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 701Q46C. Agree/Disagree: Newcomers from other countries enrich Texas with their hard work and values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 712

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

2

Page 4: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q46D. Agree/Disagree: Undocumented immigrants currently living in the United States should be deported immediately . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 723Q47A. Abortion Exceptions: The woman’s own health is seriously endangered . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 734Q47B. Abortion Exceptions: She became pregnant as a result of rape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 743Q47C. Abortion Exceptions: She became pregnant as a result of incest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 752Q47D. Abortion Exceptions: There is a strong chance of a serious defect in the baby . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 761Q47E. Abortion Exceptions: The family has very low income and cannot a↵ord any more children . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 770Q47F. Abortion Exceptions: She is not married and does not want to marry the man . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 779Q47G. Abortion Exceptions: She is married and does not want any more children . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 788Q48. College Education and Success . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 797

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

3

Page 5: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Political Habits

Q2. Political Interest

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 51 51 47 130 60 150 156 645

82.26 49.04 48.45 36.01 48.39 64.66 71.23-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 9 35 37 152 53 69 46 401

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

4

Page 6: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

14.52 33.65 38.14 42.11 42.74 29.74 21.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 1 14 12 41 8 11 11 98

1.61 13.46 12.37 11.36 6.45 4.74 5.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 1 4 1 34 3 2 4 49

1.61 3.85 1.03 9.42 2.42 0.86 1.83-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 6

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.11 0.00 0.00 0.91-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 104 97 361 124 232 219 1199

5.17 8.67 8.09 30.11 10.34 19.35 18.27===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 149 130 366 645

56.87 36.01 63.87---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 81 152 167 400

30.92 42.11 29.14---------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 27 41 29 97

10.31 11.36 5.06---------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 5 34 9 48

1.91 9.42 1.57---------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

5

Page 7: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 0 4 2 60.00 1.11 0.35

---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 361 573 1196

21.91 30.18 47.91=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 145 33 66 34 89 57 201 625

56.64 29.20 55.46 30.09 73.55 46.34 67.45------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 85 60 39 46 24 44 82 380

33.20 53.10 32.77 40.71 19.83 35.77 27.52------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 12 12 11 27 7 13 12 94

4.69 10.62 9.24 23.89 5.79 10.57 4.03------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 12 7 3 5 1 9 2 39

4.69 6.19 2.52 4.42 0.83 7.32 0.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 5

0.78 0.88 0.00 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 113 119 113 121 123 298 1143

22.40 9.89 10.41 9.89 10.59 10.76 26.07================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

6

Page 8: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 244 34 348 626

49.80 30.09 64.09-----------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 184 46 149 379

37.55 40.71 27.44-----------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 36 27 32 95

7.35 23.89 5.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 23 5 12 40

4.69 4.42 2.21-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 1 2 6

0.61 0.88 0.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 490 113 543 1146

42.76 9.86 47.38=======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

7

Page 9: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Extremely interested 122 250 204 71 64750.62 54.95 76.69 29.83

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 83 165 57 95 400

34.44 36.26 21.43 39.92---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 28 26 4 41 99

11.62 5.71 1.50 17.23---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 8 11 1 27 47

3.32 2.42 0.38 11.34---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 3 0 4 7

0.00 0.66 0.00 1.68---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 455 266 238 1200

20.08 37.92 22.17 19.83===============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 18 136 179 63 167 84 647

43.90 38.53 53.92 55.26 67.61 73.68----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 10 158 110 42 58 23 401

24.39 44.76 33.13 36.84 23.48 20.18----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 4 38 32 5 17 3 99

9.76 10.76 9.64 4.39 6.88 2.63

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

8

Page 10: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 7 20 8 4 4 4 47

17.07 5.67 2.41 3.51 1.62 3.51----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 2 1 3 0 1 0 7

4.88 0.28 0.90 0.00 0.40 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 353 332 114 247 114 1201

3.41 29.39 27.64 9.49 20.57 9.49==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 112 141 66 151 172 642

59.57 53.21 50.00 53.55 52.28-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 56 85 49 105 105 400

29.79 32.08 37.12 37.23 31.91-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 10 25 11 20 33 99

5.32 9.43 8.33 7.09 10.03-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 9 13 4 5 18 49

4.79 4.91 3.03 1.77 5.47-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 1 1 2 1 1 6

0.53 0.38 1.52 0.35 0.30-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 265 132 282 329 1196

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

9

Page 11: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

15.72 22.16 11.04 23.58 27.51=========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 439 62 111 13 2 8 11 646

61.14 40.00 40.66 59.09 50.00 61.54 78.57------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 206 69 108 9 1 4 3 400

28.69 44.52 39.56 40.91 25.00 30.77 21.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 52 12 34 0 0 1 0 99

7.24 7.74 12.45 0.00 0.00 7.69 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 17 10 19 0 1 0 0 47

2.37 6.45 6.96 0.00 25.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 7

0.56 1.29 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 155 273 22 4 13 14 1199

59.88 12.93 22.77 1.83 0.33 1.08 1.17==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

10

Page 12: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 378 12 79 30 125 22 646

58.15 50.00 51.97 46.15 49.02 38.60---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 201 9 53 27 90 22 402

30.92 37.50 34.87 41.54 35.29 38.60---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 46 1 12 6 23 11 99

7.08 4.17 7.89 9.23 9.02 19.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 21 2 8 2 14 2 49

3.23 8.33 5.26 3.08 5.49 3.51---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 0 0 0 3 0 7

0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.18 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 650 24 152 65 255 57 1203

54.03 2.00 12.64 5.40 21.20 4.74=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------Extremely interested 347 300 647

61.74 46.95-----------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 176 225 401

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

11

Page 13: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

31.32 35.21-----------------------------------------------Not very interested 22 76 98

3.91 11.89-----------------------------------------------Not at all interested 14 34 48

2.49 5.32-----------------------------------------------Don't know 3 4 7

0.53 0.63-----------------------------------------------Total 562 639 1201

46.79 53.21===============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 188 334 122 644

52.51 56.51 49.19---------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 124 184 92 400

34.64 31.13 37.10---------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 23 54 22 99

6.42 9.14 8.87---------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 20 17 11 48

5.59 2.88 4.44---------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

12

Page 14: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 3 2 1 60.84 0.34 0.40

---------------------------------------------------------Total 358 591 248 1197

29.91 49.37 20.72=========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 136 212 61 62 175 646

54.18 57.45 50.00 57.94 49.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 93 108 50 29 121 401

37.05 29.27 40.98 27.10 34.47----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 16 33 5 9 35 98

6.37 8.94 4.10 8.41 9.97----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 5 14 6 7 16 48

1.99 3.79 4.92 6.54 4.56----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 1 2 0 0 4 7

0.40 0.54 0.00 0.00 1.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 369 122 107 351 1200

20.92 30.75 10.17 8.92 29.25============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

13

Page 15: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 91 143 285 128 647

45.96 45.54 61.82 56.39--------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 73 110 137 80 400

36.87 35.03 29.72 35.24--------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 21 42 21 14 98

10.61 13.38 4.56 6.17--------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 11 17 16 5 49

5.56 5.41 3.47 2.20--------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 2 2 2 0 6

1.01 0.64 0.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 461 227 1200

16.50 26.17 38.42 18.92==============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

14

Page 16: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q3. Voting Habit

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 28 25 21 60 30 93 97 354

45.16 24.04 21.88 16.62 24.19 40.26 44.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 27 47 47 144 48 104 81 498

43.55 45.19 48.96 39.89 38.71 45.02 37.33-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

15

Page 17: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

About half 3 15 11 48 23 17 18 1354.84 14.42 11.46 13.30 18.55 7.36 8.29

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 3 8 11 61 13 13 10 119

4.84 7.69 11.46 16.90 10.48 5.63 4.61-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 1 9 6 42 10 3 8 79

1.61 8.65 6.25 11.63 8.06 1.30 3.69-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 0 0 6 0 1 3 10

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.66 0.00 0.43 1.38-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 104 96 361 124 231 217 1195

5.19 8.70 8.03 30.21 10.38 19.33 18.16===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 73 60 219 352

27.97 16.62 38.35---------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 121 144 233 498

46.36 39.89 40.81---------------------------------------------------------------------About half 29 48 58 135

11.11 13.30 10.16---------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 22 61 36 119

8.43 16.90 6.30

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

16

Page 18: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------None 16 42 21 79

6.13 11.63 3.68---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 6 4 10

0.00 1.66 0.70---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 361 571 1193

21.88 30.26 47.86=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 88 16 19 18 44 36 123 344

34.65 14.16 15.83 15.93 36.67 29.03 41.55------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 108 42 59 44 56 43 130 482

42.52 37.17 49.17 38.94 46.67 34.68 43.92------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About half 26 18 20 15 10 18 23 130

10.24 15.93 16.67 13.27 8.33 14.52 7.77------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 20 28 10 19 7 17 11 112

7.87 24.78 8.33 16.81 5.83 13.71 3.72------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 9 9 11 15 2 9 9 64

3.54 7.96 9.17 13.27 1.67 7.26 3.04------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 0 1 2 1 1 0 8

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

17

Page 19: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.18 0.00 0.83 1.77 0.83 0.81 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 113 120 113 120 124 296 1140

22.28 9.91 10.53 9.91 10.53 10.88 25.96================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 123 18 203 344

25.31 15.93 37.38-----------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 210 44 230 484

43.21 38.94 42.36-----------------------------------------------------------------------About half 64 15 52 131

13.17 13.27 9.58-----------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 57 19 35 111

11.73 16.81 6.45-----------------------------------------------------------------------None 28 15 21 64

5.76 13.27 3.87-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 2 2 8

0.82 1.77 0.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 113 543 1142

42.56 9.89 47.55=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

18

Page 20: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 82 116 115 39 352

34.17 25.61 43.07 16.32---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 92 206 116 86 500

38.33 45.47 43.45 35.98---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About half 30 60 17 29 136

12.50 13.25 6.37 12.13---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 20 51 15 35 121

8.33 11.26 5.62 14.64---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 16 17 3 44 80

6.67 3.75 1.12 18.41---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 3 1 6 10

0.00 0.66 0.37 2.51---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 453 267 239 1199

20.02 37.78 22.27 19.93===============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

19

Page 21: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 5 88 90 35 89 45 352

12.50 25.00 27.19 31.25 36.03 39.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 18 133 142 42 115 49 499

45.00 37.78 42.90 37.50 46.56 42.61----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About half 4 45 38 17 21 10 135

10.00 12.78 11.48 15.18 8.50 8.70----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 4 43 37 13 16 8 121

10.00 12.22 11.18 11.61 6.48 6.96----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 8 41 18 5 4 3 79

20.00 11.65 5.44 4.46 1.62 2.61----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 1 2 6 0 2 0 11

2.50 0.57 1.81 0.00 0.81 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 352 331 112 247 115 1197

3.34 29.41 27.65 9.36 20.63 9.61==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

20

Page 22: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Every election 70 94 40 64 84 35237.43 35.61 30.30 22.86 25.69

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 70 118 53 122 132 495

37.43 44.70 40.15 43.57 40.37-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About half 18 21 20 42 34 135

9.63 7.95 15.15 15.00 10.40-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 19 14 15 31 41 120

10.16 5.30 11.36 11.07 12.54-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 10 16 3 19 31 79

5.35 6.06 2.27 6.79 9.48-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 1 1 2 5 9

0.00 0.38 0.76 0.71 1.53-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 264 132 280 327 1190

15.71 22.18 11.09 23.53 27.48=========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 233 39 61 3 3 4 10 353

32.50 25.49 22.43 13.64 75.00 28.57 71.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 319 60 96 15 0 6 4 500

44.49 39.22 35.29 68.18 0.00 42.86 28.57

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

21

Page 23: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About half 74 19 37 3 0 1 0 134

10.32 12.42 13.60 13.64 0.00 7.14 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 57 20 40 1 0 2 0 120

7.95 13.07 14.71 4.55 0.00 14.29 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 27 12 38 0 1 1 0 79

3.77 7.84 13.97 0.00 25.00 7.14 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 10

0.98 1.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 717 153 272 22 4 14 14 1196

59.95 12.79 22.74 1.84 0.33 1.17 1.17==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 213 2 30 22 77 8 352

32.82 8.33 19.87 33.85 30.43 13.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 281 11 69 33 84 22 500

43.30 45.83 45.70 50.77 33.20 37.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About half 71 1 20 4 34 7 137

10.94 4.17 13.25 6.15 13.44 12.07---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 52 8 21 3 27 10 121

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

22

Page 24: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

8.01 33.33 13.91 4.62 10.67 17.24---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 29 1 10 3 27 10 80

4.47 4.17 6.62 4.62 10.67 17.24---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 1 1 0 4 1 10

0.46 4.17 0.66 0.00 1.58 1.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 649 24 151 65 253 58 1200

54.08 2.00 12.58 5.42 21.08 4.83=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------Every election 192 161 353

34.22 25.31-----------------------------------------------Almost every election 244 255 499

43.49 40.09-----------------------------------------------About half 57 79 136

10.16 12.42-----------------------------------------------One or two 37 83 120

6.60 13.05-----------------------------------------------None 25 54 79

4.46 8.49-----------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

23

Page 25: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 6 4 101.07 0.63

-----------------------------------------------Total 561 636 1197

46.87 53.13===============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------Every election 98 176 79 353

27.37 29.98 31.85---------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 145 254 99 498

40.50 43.27 39.92---------------------------------------------------------About half 41 67 27 135

11.45 11.41 10.89---------------------------------------------------------One or two 45 50 25 120

12.57 8.52 10.08---------------------------------------------------------None 25 36 16 77

6.98 6.13 6.45---------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 4 2 10

1.12 0.68 0.81---------------------------------------------------------Total 358 587 248 1193

30.01 49.20 20.79

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

24

Page 26: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=========================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 76 101 39 40 97 353

30.28 27.45 31.97 37.04 27.71----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 122 148 47 39 143 499

48.61 40.22 38.52 36.11 40.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About half 20 52 10 8 46 136

7.97 14.13 8.20 7.41 13.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 24 35 13 13 36 121

9.56 9.51 10.66 12.04 10.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 9 29 13 8 21 80

3.59 7.88 10.66 7.41 6.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 3 0 0 7 10

0.00 0.82 0.00 0.00 2.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 368 122 108 350 1199

20.93 30.69 10.18 9.01 29.19============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

25

Page 27: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------Every election 42 81 137 93 353

21.32 25.80 29.72 41.15--------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 70 110 216 103 499

35.53 35.03 46.85 45.58--------------------------------------------------------------About half 25 44 57 11 137

12.69 14.01 12.36 4.87--------------------------------------------------------------One or two 29 44 35 12 120

14.72 14.01 7.59 5.31--------------------------------------------------------------None 27 31 14 7 79

13.71 9.87 3.04 3.10--------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 4 2 0 10

2.03 1.27 0.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------Total 197 314 461 226 1198

16.44 26.21 38.48 18.86==============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

26

Page 28: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Texas Political Mood

Q4. MIP Country

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 10 17 12 77 24 33 37 210

15.87 15.89 12.50 21.45 19.67 14.29 17.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 0 3 5 31 25 53 50 167

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

27

Page 29: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 2.80 5.21 8.64 20.49 22.94 23.15--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadershi 3 5 11 32 25 41 41 158

4.76 4.67 11.46 8.91 20.49 17.75 18.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 7 9 8 44 3 11 4 86

11.11 8.41 8.33 12.26 2.46 4.76 1.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 2 6 6 32 3 7 10 66

3.17 5.61 6.25 8.91 2.46 3.03 4.63--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 6 14 11 11 2 2 0 46

9.52 13.08 11.46 3.06 1.64 0.87 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 10 21 20 11 5 0 0 67

15.87 19.63 20.83 3.06 4.10 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 1 0 0 15 9 24 22 71

1.59 0.00 0.00 4.18 7.38 10.39 10.19--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 0 5 7 6 2 3 1 24

0.00 4.67 7.29 1.67 1.64 1.30 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 1 0 2 11 1 8 1 24

1.59 0.00 2.08 3.06 0.82 3.46 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 1 5 0 6 9 9 9 39

1.59 4.67 0.00 1.67 7.38 3.90 4.17--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 0 0 0 12 3 4 4 23

0.00 0.00 0.00 3.34 2.46 1.73 1.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 2 3 5 12 1 10 1 34

3.17 2.80 5.21 3.34 0.82 4.33 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 4

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

28

Page 30: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 0.93 2.08 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 5 2 0 5 0 7 4 23

7.94 1.87 0.00 1.39 0.00 3.03 1.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 9 6 2 6 0 0 1 24

14.29 5.61 2.08 1.67 0.00 0.00 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 4

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.43 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2

1.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 2 0 0 2 0 8 15 27

3.17 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.00 3.46 6.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 0 4 4 12 2 0 0 22

0.00 3.74 4.17 3.34 1.64 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 5

1.59 0.93 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 0 1 0 11 4 4 4 24

0.00 0.93 0.00 3.06 3.28 1.73 1.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 0 1 1 14 3 3 6 28

0.00 0.93 1.04 3.90 2.46 1.30 2.78--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 0 0 0 3 1 2 4 10

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.84 0.82 0.87 1.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2

1.59 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

29

Page 31: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

1.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3

0.00 2.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 107 96 359 122 231 216 1194

5.28 8.96 8.04 30.07 10.22 19.35 18.09============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 39 77 94 210

14.77 21.45 16.52---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 8 31 127 166

3.03 8.64 22.32---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 19 32 107 158

7.20 8.91 18.80---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 24 44 18 86

9.09 12.26 3.16---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 13 32 20 65

4.92 8.91 3.51---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

30

Page 32: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Partisan gridlock 30 11 3 4411.36 3.06 0.53

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 51 11 5 67

19.32 3.06 0.88---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 1 15 56 72

0.38 4.18 9.84---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 12 6 6 24

4.55 1.67 1.05---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 3 11 10 24

1.14 3.06 1.76---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 6 6 28 40

2.27 1.67 4.92---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 0 12 12 24

0.00 3.34 2.11---------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 9 12 12 33

3.41 3.34 2.11---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 3 1 0 4

1.14 0.28 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 7 5 11 23

2.65 1.39 1.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 17 6 1 24

6.44 1.67 0.18---------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 2 2 4

0.00 0.56 0.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

31

Page 33: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Housing 1 0 1 20.38 0.00 0.18

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 2 2 23 27

0.76 0.56 4.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 9 12 2 23

3.41 3.34 0.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 2 2 1 5

0.76 0.56 0.18---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 1 11 12 24

0.38 3.06 2.11---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 2 14 11 27

0.76 3.90 1.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 0 3 7 10

0.00 0.84 1.23---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 1 1 0 2

0.38 0.28 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 1 0 0 1

0.38 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 3 0 0 3

1.14 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 264 359 569 1192

22.15 30.12 47.73=================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

32

Page 34: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 45 13 19 25 19 25 54 200

17.58 11.40 15.97 22.12 15.70 20.16 18.18------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 10 4 4 17 31 25 66 157

3.91 3.51 3.36 15.04 25.62 20.16 22.22------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 10 7 23 16 29 20 54 159

3.91 6.14 19.33 14.16 23.97 16.13 18.18------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 36 10 6 12 4 7 10 85

14.06 8.77 5.04 10.62 3.31 5.65 3.37------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 15 10 6 4 2 9 12 58

5.86 8.77 5.04 3.54 1.65 7.26 4.04------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 14 10 13 3 0 2 2 44

5.47 8.77 10.92 2.65 0.00 1.61 0.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 35 12 15 2 1 1 0 66

13.67 10.53 12.61 1.77 0.83 0.81 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 3 6 2 4 13 7 34 69

1.17 5.26 1.68 3.54 10.74 5.65 11.45------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 8 7 3 0 0 3 2 23

3.12 6.14 2.52 0.00 0.00 2.42 0.67

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

33

Page 35: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 4 3 2 3 2 3 5 22

1.56 2.63 1.68 2.65 1.65 2.42 1.68------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 7 4 1 3 8 6 9 38

2.73 3.51 0.84 2.65 6.61 4.84 3.03------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 4 3 0 2 2 4 7 22

1.56 2.63 0.00 1.77 1.65 3.23 2.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 8 4 4 5 3 2 7 33

3.12 3.51 3.36 4.42 2.48 1.61 2.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 4

0.00 0.88 1.68 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 9 2 1 5 1 2 4 24

3.52 1.75 0.84 4.42 0.83 1.61 1.35------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 11 1 6 4 1 0 0 23

4.30 0.88 5.04 3.54 0.83 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 5

0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.83 1.61 0.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2

0.39 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 0 1 2 1 3 1 18 26

0.00 0.88 1.68 0.88 2.48 0.81 6.06------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 14 4 3 0 0 0 0 21

5.47 3.51 2.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 6

0.78 0.88 1.68 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

34

Page 36: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 4 5 5 1 0 3 6 24

1.56 4.39 4.20 0.88 0.00 2.42 2.02------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 9 4 0 2 1 0 3 19

3.52 3.51 0.00 1.77 0.83 0.00 1.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 0 0 2 0 2 3 8

0.39 0.00 0.00 1.77 0.00 1.61 1.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2

0.39 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3

1.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 114 119 113 121 124 297 1144

22.38 9.97 10.40 9.88 10.58 10.84 25.96============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 76 25 98 199

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

35

Page 37: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

15.57 22.12 18.15-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 18 17 122 157

3.69 15.04 22.59-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 40 16 103 159

8.20 14.16 19.07-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 51 12 20 83

10.45 10.62 3.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 31 4 23 58

6.35 3.54 4.26-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 37 3 3 43

7.58 2.65 0.56-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 62 2 2 66

12.70 1.77 0.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 11 4 54 69

2.25 3.54 10.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 18 0 5 23

3.69 0.00 0.93-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 10 3 9 22

2.05 2.65 1.67-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 12 3 23 38

2.46 2.65 4.26-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 7 2 14 23

1.43 1.77 2.59-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 16 5 12 33

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

36

Page 38: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

3.28 4.42 2.22-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 3 1 0 4

0.61 0.88 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 11 5 6 22

2.25 4.42 1.11-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 18 4 1 23

3.69 3.54 0.19-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 1 0 4 5

0.20 0.00 0.74-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 2 0 0 2

0.41 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 4 1 23 28

0.82 0.88 4.26-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 22 0 0 22

4.51 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 4 1 0 5

0.82 0.88 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 14 1 9 24

2.87 0.88 1.67-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 13 2 4 19

2.66 1.77 0.74-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 2 5 8

0.20 1.77 0.93-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 2 0 0 2

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

37

Page 39: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.41 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 1 0 0 1

0.20 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 3 0 0 3

0.61 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 113 540 1141

42.77 9.90 47.33===================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 55 68 43 44 210

22.82 15.08 16.23 18.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 49 13 71 32 165

20.33 2.88 26.79 13.62---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 24 40 66 30 160

9.96 8.87 24.91 12.77---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 10 48 5 23 86

4.15 10.64 1.89 9.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

38

Page 40: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Health care 14 38 5 8 655.81 8.43 1.89 3.40

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 3 38 0 4 45

1.24 8.43 0.00 1.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 1 61 0 4 66

0.41 13.53 0.00 1.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 12 7 24 28 71

4.98 1.55 9.06 11.91---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 6 17 0 1 24

2.49 3.77 0.00 0.43---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 5 8 5 5 23

2.07 1.77 1.89 2.13---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 10 9 12 8 39

4.15 2.00 4.53 3.40---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 8 6 6 5 25

3.32 1.33 2.26 2.13---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 8 16 4 5 33

3.32 3.55 1.51 2.13---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 1 2 0 1 4

0.41 0.44 0.00 0.43---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 9 9 2 4 24

3.73 2.00 0.75 1.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 0 17 3 3 23

0.00 3.77 1.13 1.28---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

39

Page 41: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

The media 3 0 1 1 51.24 0.00 0.38 0.43

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 2 0 0 2

0.00 0.44 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 8 3 12 4 27

3.32 0.67 4.53 1.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 0 20 0 3 23

0.00 4.43 0.00 1.28---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 1 4 0 0 5

0.41 0.89 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 7 8 2 7 24

2.90 1.77 0.75 2.98---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 5 11 0 10 26

2.07 2.44 0.00 4.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 2 1 4 4 11

0.83 0.22 1.51 1.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 0 1 0 1 2

0.00 0.22 0.00 0.43---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 0 1 0 0 1

0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 3 0 0 3

0.00 0.67 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

40

Page 42: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Total 241 451 265 235 119220.22 37.84 22.23 19.71

===========================================================================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 3 63 66 19 42 17 210

6.98 17.80 20.31 16.52 16.94 14.78----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 4 52 48 16 27 19 166

9.30 14.69 14.77 13.91 10.89 16.52----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 6 48 37 15 32 22 160

13.95 13.56 11.38 13.04 12.90 19.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 3 30 23 4 15 11 86

6.98 8.47 7.08 3.48 6.05 9.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 3 21 20 7 13 0 64

6.98 5.93 6.15 6.09 5.24 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 1 6 14 6 8 11 46

2.33 1.69 4.31 5.22 3.23 9.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 0 9 16 3 29 9 66

0.00 2.54 4.92 2.61 11.69 7.83----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 2 18 22 4 20 5 71

4.65 5.08 6.77 3.48 8.06 4.35

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

41

Page 43: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 0 4 7 3 7 3 24

0.00 1.13 2.15 2.61 2.82 2.61----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 1 10 3 0 6 4 24

2.33 2.82 0.92 0.00 2.42 3.48----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 2 13 6 7 11 1 40

4.65 3.67 1.85 6.09 4.44 0.87----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 2 3 7 0 8 5 25

4.65 0.85 2.15 0.00 3.23 4.35----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 0 15 15 4 0 0 34

0.00 4.24 4.62 3.48 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 1 1 0 0 2 0 4

2.33 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 0 12 6 4 2 0 24

0.00 3.39 1.85 3.48 0.81 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 0 5 5 4 5 5 24

0.00 1.41 1.54 3.48 2.02 4.35----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 1 2 0 2 0 5

0.00 0.28 0.62 0.00 0.81 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 0 0 1 0 0 2

2.33 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 2 10 6 6 3 1 28

4.65 2.82 1.85 5.22 1.21 0.87----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 4 7 3 4 5 0 23

9.30 1.98 0.92 3.48 2.02 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

42

Page 44: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 0 0 2 2 1 0 5

0.00 0.00 0.62 1.74 0.40 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 2 11 7 3 1 0 24

4.65 3.11 2.15 2.61 0.40 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 3 12 7 2 3 1 28

6.98 3.39 2.15 1.74 1.21 0.87----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 3 2 1 1 4 0 11

6.98 0.56 0.31 0.87 1.61 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 0 1 1 0 0 0 2

0.00 0.28 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 0 1 0 1 1 3

0.00 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.40 0.87----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 43 354 325 115 248 115 1200

3.58 29.50 27.08 9.58 20.67 9.58======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================attend

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

43

Page 45: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 30 40 22 58 55 205

16.39 15.15 16.67 20.64 16.77-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 34 40 19 37 36 166

18.58 15.15 14.39 13.17 10.98-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 20 34 18 36 52 160

10.93 12.88 13.64 12.81 15.85-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 5 26 7 26 24 88

2.73 9.85 5.30 9.25 7.32-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 4 12 14 17 18 65

2.19 4.55 10.61 6.05 5.49-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 1 3 3 20 19 46

0.55 1.14 2.27 7.12 5.79-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 4 7 7 21 28 67

2.19 2.65 5.30 7.47 8.54-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 30 20 10 4 7 71

16.39 7.58 7.58 1.42 2.13-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 5 0 4 7 8 24

2.73 0.00 3.03 2.49 2.44-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 2 12 1 6 3 24

1.09 4.55 0.76 2.14 0.91-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 8 9 3 9 9 38

4.37 3.41 2.27 3.20 2.74-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 2 7 3 2 9 23

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

44

Page 46: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.09 2.65 2.27 0.71 2.74-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 6 8 6 4 9 33

3.28 3.03 4.55 1.42 2.74-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 0 1 0 2 1 4

0.00 0.38 0.00 0.71 0.30-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 5 10 1 1 6 23

2.73 3.79 0.76 0.36 1.83-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 1 5 0 3 14 23

0.55 1.89 0.00 1.07 4.27-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 2 2 0 1 5

0.00 0.76 1.52 0.00 0.30-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 1 0 1 0 2

0.00 0.38 0.00 0.36 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 6 7 0 5 9 27

3.28 2.65 0.00 1.78 2.74-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 2 3 5 7 6 23

1.09 1.14 3.79 2.49 1.83-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 2 1 0 1 1 5

1.09 0.38 0.00 0.36 0.30-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 5 5 3 5 5 23

2.73 1.89 2.27 1.78 1.52-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 5 8 4 8 2 27

2.73 3.03 3.03 2.85 0.61-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 6 3 0 1 0 10

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

45

Page 47: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

3.28 1.14 0.00 0.36 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 0 0 0 0 2 2

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 0 0 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 0 0 0 3 3

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 183 264 132 281 328 1188

15.40 22.22 11.11 23.65 27.61=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA ge Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 111 30 61 1 0 5 1 209

15.50 19.74 22.43 4.55 0.00 41.67 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 115 8 34 2 2 1 3 165

16.06 5.26 12.50 9.09 66.67 8.33 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 119 8 23 3 0 3 5 161

16.62 5.26 8.46 13.64 0.00 25.00 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

46

Page 48: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Unemployment/jobs 36 20 19 8 0 0 3 865.03 13.16 6.99 36.36 0.00 0.00 21.43

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 31 14 19 0 0 1 0 65

4.33 9.21 6.99 0.00 0.00 8.33 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 33 3 7 2 0 0 0 45

4.61 1.97 2.57 9.09 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 42 5 19 1 0 0 0 67

5.87 3.29 6.99 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 53 6 10 0 0 0 1 70

7.40 3.95 3.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 10 6 7 1 0 0 0 24

1.40 3.95 2.57 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 14 2 7 0 0 0 0 23

1.96 1.32 2.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 24 7 7 1 0 1 0 40

3.35 4.61 2.57 4.55 0.00 8.33 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 14 6 5 0 0 0 0 25

1.96 3.95 1.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 16 4 13 0 0 0 0 33

2.23 2.63 4.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 4

0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.33 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 11 6 5 0 1 0 0 23

1.54 3.95 1.84 0.00 33.33 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

47

Page 49: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Environment 16 0 8 0 0 0 0 242.23 0.00 2.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 5

0.56 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2

0.00 0.66 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 24 0 3 0 0 0 0 27

3.35 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 11 8 4 0 0 0 0 23

1.54 5.26 1.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 5

0.14 1.32 0.37 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 12 5 6 0 0 0 0 23

1.68 3.29 2.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 4 9 12 1 0 0 0 26

0.56 5.92 4.41 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 8 1 0 0 0 0 1 10

1.12 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2

0.00 0.66 0.00 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

48

Page 50: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Voting system 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 716 152 272 22 3 12 14 1191

60.12 12.76 22.84 1.85 0.25 1.01 1.18============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 112 3 24 10 45 16 210

17.36 13.64 15.79 14.71 17.86 27.59---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 103 6 19 9 28 1 166

15.97 27.27 12.50 13.24 11.11 1.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 86 3 25 8 33 3 158

13.33 13.64 16.45 11.76 13.10 5.17---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 38 1 5 9 26 8 87

5.89 4.55 3.29 13.24 10.32 13.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 38 1 10 1 13 3 66

5.89 4.55 6.58 1.47 5.16 5.17---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 22 0 11 2 8 2 45

3.41 0.00 7.24 2.94 3.17 3.45---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 28 0 14 3 14 7 66

4.34 0.00 9.21 4.41 5.56 12.07

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

49

Page 51: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 43 0 6 7 9 6 71

6.67 0.00 3.95 10.29 3.57 10.34---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 12 1 3 0 8 1 25

1.86 4.55 1.97 0.00 3.17 1.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 18 1 1 1 3 0 24

2.79 4.55 0.66 1.47 1.19 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 26 1 3 5 4 1 40

4.03 4.55 1.97 7.35 1.59 1.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 14 2 0 0 4 4 24

2.17 9.09 0.00 0.00 1.59 6.90---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 15 1 3 2 11 2 34

2.33 4.55 1.97 2.94 4.37 3.45---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 1 0 0 1 2 0 4

0.16 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.79 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 3 1 7 1 10 2 24

0.47 4.55 4.61 1.47 3.97 3.45---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 13 0 4 0 6 0 23

2.02 0.00 2.63 0.00 2.38 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 3 0 0 0 1 0 4

0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 0 0 1 0 1 2

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.00 1.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 22 0 3 3 0 0 28

3.41 0.00 1.97 4.41 0.00 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

50

Page 52: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 10 0 7 1 4 0 22

1.55 0.00 4.61 1.47 1.59 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 3 0 2 0 0 0 5

0.47 0.00 1.32 0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 7 0 5 2 9 1 24

1.09 0.00 3.29 2.94 3.57 1.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 18 0 0 1 9 0 28

2.79 0.00 0.00 1.47 3.57 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 6 1 0 1 3 0 11

0.93 4.55 0.00 1.47 1.19 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 2 0 0 0 0 0 2

0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 2 0 0 0 1 0 3

0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 645 22 152 68 252 58 1197

53.88 1.84 12.70 5.68 21.05 4.85=====================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

51

Page 53: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

===========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------------------The economy 97 113 210

17.38 17.80-----------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 90 76 166

16.13 11.97-----------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 76 84 160

13.62 13.23-----------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 40 46 86

7.17 7.24-----------------------------------------------------------Health care 23 42 65

4.12 6.61-----------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 22 23 45

3.94 3.62-----------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 36 31 67

6.45 4.88-----------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 31 40 71

5.56 6.30-----------------------------------------------------------Education 7 18 25

1.25 2.83-----------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 7 16 23

1.25 2.52-----------------------------------------------------------Immigration 18 21 39

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

52

Page 54: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

3.23 3.31-----------------------------------------------------------Taxes 11 13 24

1.97 2.05-----------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 13 21 34

2.33 3.31-----------------------------------------------------------Energy 3 1 4

0.54 0.16-----------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 17 6 23

3.05 0.94-----------------------------------------------------------Environment 11 13 24

1.97 2.05-----------------------------------------------------------The media 3 2 5

0.54 0.31-----------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 2 2

0.00 0.31-----------------------------------------------------------Border security 16 11 27

2.87 1.73-----------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 7 15 22

1.25 2.36-----------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 3 1 4

0.54 0.16-----------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 11 13 24

1.97 2.05-----------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 10 17 27

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

53

Page 55: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.79 2.68-----------------------------------------------------------Abortion 4 6 10

0.72 0.94-----------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 1 1 2

0.18 0.16-----------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0

0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 1 0 1

0.18 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 3 3

0.00 0.47-----------------------------------------------------------Total 558 635 1193

46.77 53.23===========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 65 112 33 210

18.21 19.02 13.20---------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 42 87 36 165

11.76 14.77 14.40---------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

54

Page 56: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Political corruption/leadership 38 80 42 16010.64 13.58 16.80

---------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 24 51 12 87

6.72 8.66 4.80---------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 28 22 15 65

7.84 3.74 6.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 15 28 2 45

4.20 4.75 0.80---------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 28 34 4 66

7.84 5.77 1.60---------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 17 27 27 71

4.76 4.58 10.80---------------------------------------------------------------------Education 6 16 3 25

1.68 2.72 1.20---------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 4 11 9 24

1.12 1.87 3.60---------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 9 12 19 40

2.52 2.04 7.60---------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 5 17 3 25

1.40 2.89 1.20---------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 12 13 8 33

3.36 2.21 3.20---------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 3 1 0 4

0.84 0.17 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

55

Page 57: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Gay marriage 9 9 5 232.52 1.53 2.00

---------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 7 14 2 23

1.96 2.38 0.80---------------------------------------------------------------------The media 1 3 1 5

0.28 0.51 0.40---------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 2 0 0 2

0.56 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 3 15 9 27

0.84 2.55 3.60---------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 10 8 5 23

2.80 1.36 2.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 3 1 1 5

0.84 0.17 0.40---------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 11 8 5 24

3.08 1.36 2.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 9 13 5 27

2.52 2.21 2.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 2 5 4 11

0.56 0.85 1.60---------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 1 1 0 2

0.28 0.17 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

56

Page 58: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Foreign trade 0 1 0 10.00 0.17 0.00

---------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 3 0 0 3

0.84 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 589 250 1196

29.85 49.25 20.90=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 44 60 25 16 65 210

17.46 16.35 21.01 14.95 18.68----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 38 49 19 10 50 166

15.08 13.35 15.97 9.35 14.37----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 33 43 14 16 53 159

13.10 11.72 11.76 14.95 15.23----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 19 31 7 8 22 87

7.54 8.45 5.88 7.48 6.32----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 16 16 8 7 19 66

6.35 4.36 6.72 6.54 5.46----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 15 14 4 9 4 46

5.95 3.81 3.36 8.41 1.15

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

57

Page 59: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 14 24 5 11 12 66

5.56 6.54 4.20 10.28 3.45----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 10 17 4 2 38 71

3.97 4.63 3.36 1.87 10.92----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 6 11 0 2 5 24

2.38 3.00 0.00 1.87 1.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 5 7 2 0 9 23

1.98 1.91 1.68 0.00 2.59----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 7 12 3 8 10 40

2.78 3.27 2.52 7.48 2.87----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 10 6 1 0 7 24

3.97 1.63 0.84 0.00 2.01----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 4 10 6 0 14 34

1.59 2.72 5.04 0.00 4.02----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 1 0 1 0 2 4

0.40 0.00 0.84 0.00 0.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 2 11 1 3 5 22

0.79 3.00 0.84 2.80 1.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 6 8 1 6 1 22

2.38 2.18 0.84 5.61 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 3 1 0 1 5

0.00 0.82 0.84 0.00 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 0 0 1 1 2

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.93 0.29

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

58

Page 60: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 5 11 5 0 6 27

1.98 3.00 4.20 0.00 1.72----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 4 5 3 4 7 23

1.59 1.36 2.52 3.74 2.01----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 0 2 1 0 2 5

0.00 0.54 0.84 0.00 0.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 7 8 4 2 3 24

2.78 2.18 3.36 1.87 0.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 5 14 3 0 5 27

1.98 3.81 2.52 0.00 1.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 3 0 1 5 10

0.40 0.82 0.00 0.93 1.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 0 1 1 0 0 2

0.00 0.27 0.84 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 0 0 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 1 0 1 1 3

0.00 0.27 0.00 0.93 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 252 367 119 107 348 1193

21.12 30.76 9.97 8.97 29.17========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

59

Page 61: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 36 71 78 25 210

18.85 22.68 16.88 10.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 13 38 68 47 166

6.81 12.14 14.72 20.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 14 40 66 40 160

7.33 12.78 14.29 17.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 18 20 35 14 87

9.42 6.39 7.58 6.09--------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 11 23 22 9 65

5.76 7.35 4.76 3.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 3 9 27 7 46

1.57 2.88 5.84 3.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 12 16 30 8 66

6.28 5.11 6.49 3.48--------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 12 17 24 19 72

6.28 5.43 5.19 8.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 6 10 9 0 25

3.14 3.19 1.95 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 3 4 7 9 23

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

60

Page 62: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.57 1.28 1.52 3.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 5 6 17 12 40

2.62 1.92 3.68 5.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 4 13 7 0 24

2.09 4.15 1.52 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 9 6 10 8 33

4.71 1.92 2.16 3.48--------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 0 2 0 2 4

0.00 0.64 0.00 0.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 12 7 4 0 23

6.28 2.24 0.87 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 5 6 7 6 24

2.62 1.92 1.52 2.61--------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 2 0 2 1 5

1.05 0.00 0.43 0.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 0 2 0 2

0.00 0.00 0.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 3 4 11 9 27

1.57 1.28 2.38 3.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 1 3 13 5 22

0.52 0.96 2.81 2.17--------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 0 2 2 0 4

0.00 0.64 0.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 8 6 8 2 24

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

61

Page 63: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

4.19 1.92 1.73 0.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 9 9 6 3 27

4.71 2.88 1.30 1.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 4 1 3 2 10

2.09 0.32 0.65 0.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 1 0 1 0 2

0.52 0.00 0.22 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 0 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 0 3 1 4

0.00 0.00 0.65 0.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 191 313 462 230 1196

15.97 26.17 38.63 19.23==========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

62

Page 64: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q5. MIP State

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 3 5 5 39 25 61 42 180

4.69 4.90 5.10 10.92 20.66 26.64 19.27--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 3 2 1 21 19 58 72 176

4.69 1.96 1.02 5.88 15.70 25.33 33.03--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

63

Page 65: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Unemployment/jobs 6 2 10 43 3 13 8 859.38 1.96 10.20 12.04 2.48 5.68 3.67

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadershi 13 30 30 34 4 4 3 118

20.31 29.41 30.61 9.52 3.31 1.75 1.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 4 13 10 19 5 6 3 60

6.25 12.75 10.20 5.32 4.13 2.62 1.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 3 10 2 25 13 10 2 65

4.69 9.80 2.04 7.00 10.74 4.37 0.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 5 14 2 25 2 4 4 56

7.81 13.73 2.04 7.00 1.65 1.75 1.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 7 3 8 30 16 17 11 92

10.94 2.94 8.16 8.40 13.22 7.42 5.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 2 4 1 19 4 4 3 37

3.12 3.92 1.02 5.32 3.31 1.75 1.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 1 0 0 6 1 12 21 41

1.56 0.00 0.00 1.68 0.83 5.24 9.63--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 1 3 1 7 2 9 7 30

1.56 2.94 1.02 1.96 1.65 3.93 3.21--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 1 5 4 4 2 0 0 16

1.56 4.90 4.08 1.12 1.65 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 3 1 1 14 3 0 0 22

4.69 0.98 1.02 3.92 2.48 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 0 1 5 16 6 4 11 43

0.00 0.98 5.10 4.48 4.96 1.75 5.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

64

Page 66: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

State government spending 0 0 2 12 3 2 3 220.00 0.00 2.04 3.36 2.48 0.87 1.38

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 0 1 0 7 2 8 2 20

0.00 0.98 0.00 1.96 1.65 3.49 0.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 0 3 0 4 1 0 3 11

0.00 2.94 0.00 1.12 0.83 0.00 1.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 2 0 0 0 2 2 1 7

3.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.65 0.87 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 6 1 5 3 1 0 3 19

9.38 0.98 5.10 0.84 0.83 0.00 1.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 0 0 2 12 4 4 3 25

0.00 0.00 2.04 3.36 3.31 1.75 1.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 3

0.00 0.00 1.02 0.00 0.83 0.00 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 3

0.00 0.00 1.02 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 5

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 1.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 1 3 1 1 0 0 6

0.00 0.98 3.06 0.28 0.83 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 0 1 0 1 0 4 9 15

0.00 0.98 0.00 0.28 0.00 1.75 4.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 4 2 3 6 0 2 0 17

6.25 1.96 3.06 1.68 0.00 0.87 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

65

Page 67: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

The media 0 0 1 2 0 3 1 70.00 0.00 1.02 0.56 0.00 1.31 0.46

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 0 0 0 5 1 1 0 7

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.40 0.83 0.44 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 64 102 98 357 121 229 218 1189

5.38 8.58 8.24 30.03 10.18 19.26 18.33============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 13 39 129 181

4.96 10.92 22.67---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 6 21 149 176

2.29 5.88 26.19---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 18 43 25 86

6.87 12.04 4.39---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 73 34 11 118

27.86 9.52 1.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 27 19 15 61

10.31 5.32 2.64

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

66

Page 68: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 14 25 25 64

5.34 7.00 4.39---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 22 25 9 56

8.40 7.00 1.58---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 18 30 45 93

6.87 8.40 7.91---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 7 19 11 37

2.67 5.32 1.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 1 6 33 40

0.38 1.68 5.80---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 5 7 18 30

1.91 1.96 3.16---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 9 4 2 15

3.44 1.12 0.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 4 14 3 21

1.53 3.92 0.53---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 5 16 21 42

1.91 4.48 3.69---------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 2 12 9 23

0.76 3.36 1.58---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 2 7 11 20

0.76 1.96 1.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 3 4 4 11

1.15 1.12 0.70

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

67

Page 69: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 2 0 5 7

0.76 0.00 0.88---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 12 3 4 19

4.58 0.84 0.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 2 12 10 24

0.76 3.36 1.76---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 0 2 3

0.38 0.00 0.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 1 1 3

0.38 0.28 0.18---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 0 1 4 5

0.00 0.28 0.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 4 1 1 6

1.53 0.28 0.18---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 1 1 13 15

0.38 0.28 2.28---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 9 6 2 17

3.44 1.68 0.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 1 2 4 7

0.38 0.56 0.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.18---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 0 5 2 7

0.00 1.40 0.35

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

68

Page 70: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 357 569 1188

22.05 30.05 47.90=================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 11 13 7 16 39 25 65 176

4.33 11.40 5.83 14.16 31.97 20.49 21.81------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 7 3 3 14 39 24 84 174

2.76 2.63 2.50 12.39 31.97 19.67 28.19------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 37 11 4 10 2 5 10 79

14.57 9.65 3.33 8.85 1.64 4.10 3.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 34 15 49 5 7 2 2 114

13.39 13.16 40.83 4.42 5.74 1.64 0.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 22 10 7 4 2 8 7 60

8.66 8.77 5.83 3.54 1.64 6.56 2.35------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 11 5 7 8 2 13 13 59

4.33 4.39 5.83 7.08 1.64 10.66 4.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 29 7 4 6 3 2 3 54

11.42 6.14 3.33 5.31 2.46 1.64 1.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 12 9 13 14 14 12 17 91

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

69

Page 71: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

4.72 7.89 10.83 12.39 11.48 9.84 5.70------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 7 11 5 2 1 4 3 33

2.76 9.65 4.17 1.77 0.82 3.28 1.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 1 1 0 4 5 0 26 37

0.39 0.88 0.00 3.54 4.10 0.00 8.72------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 6 6 3 1 1 2 10 29

2.36 5.26 2.50 0.88 0.82 1.64 3.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 8 3 2 1 1 0 0 15

3.15 2.63 1.67 0.88 0.82 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 8 1 4 6 0 1 0 20

3.15 0.88 3.33 5.31 0.00 0.82 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 14 4 2 2 3 1 10 36

5.51 3.51 1.67 1.77 2.46 0.82 3.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 6 2 1 3 0 7 4 23

2.36 1.75 0.83 2.65 0.00 5.74 1.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 3 2 1 3 1 6 5 21

1.18 1.75 0.83 2.65 0.82 4.92 1.68------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 3 1 1 1 1 0 4 11

1.18 0.88 0.83 0.88 0.82 0.00 1.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 2 0 2 0 0 0 3 7

0.79 0.00 1.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 11 1 4 2 0 1 0 19

4.33 0.88 3.33 1.77 0.00 0.82 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 4 1 0 6 1 5 6 23

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

70

Page 72: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.57 0.88 0.00 5.31 0.82 4.10 2.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 4

0.39 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 3

0.00 0.00 0.83 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 5

0.39 0.00 0.00 0.88 0.00 0.00 1.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 6

1.57 0.88 0.00 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 3 0 0 0 0 0 11 14

1.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.69------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 7 5 0 1 0 2 2 17

2.76 4.39 0.00 0.88 0.00 1.64 0.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 7

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.64 1.68------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 5

0.79 0.88 0.00 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 114 120 113 122 122 298 1143

22.22 9.97 10.50 9.89 10.67 10.67 26.07============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

71

Page 73: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 30 16 129 175

6.19 14.16 23.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 12 14 146 172

2.47 12.39 27.04-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 51 10 17 78

10.52 8.85 3.15-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 98 5 11 114

20.21 4.42 2.04-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 39 4 17 60

8.04 3.54 3.15-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 23 8 28 59

4.74 7.08 5.19-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 40 6 8 54

8.25 5.31 1.48-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 34 14 43 91

7.01 12.39 7.96-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 23 2 7 32

4.74 1.77 1.30-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 3 4 31 38

0.62 3.54 5.74-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

72

Page 74: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Social welfare programs 15 1 12 283.09 0.88 2.22

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 13 1 1 15

2.68 0.88 0.19-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 13 6 1 20

2.68 5.31 0.19-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 20 2 14 36

4.12 1.77 2.59-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 9 3 11 23

1.86 2.65 2.04-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 5 3 12 20

1.03 2.65 2.22-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 4 1 5 10

0.82 0.88 0.93-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 4 0 3 7

0.82 0.00 0.56-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 17 2 1 20

3.51 1.77 0.19-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 5 6 13 24

1.03 5.31 2.41-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 2 0 2 4

0.41 0.00 0.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 1 1 3

0.21 0.88 0.19-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

73

Page 75: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Insurance rates 1 1 3 50.21 0.88 0.56

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 5 1 0 6

1.03 0.88 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 3 0 11 14

0.62 0.00 2.04-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 11 1 4 16

2.27 0.88 0.74-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 0 6 6

0.00 0.00 1.11-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.19-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 4 1 2 7

0.82 0.88 0.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 485 113 540 1138

42.62 9.93 47.45===================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 42 26 84 30 182

17.50 5.74 31.34 13.10

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

74

Page 76: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 35 11 86 44 176

14.58 2.43 32.09 19.21---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 21 43 3 19 86

8.75 9.49 1.12 8.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 1 100 7 10 118

0.42 22.08 2.61 4.37---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 8 42 7 4 61

3.33 9.27 2.61 1.75---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 20 22 5 18 65

8.33 4.86 1.87 7.86---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 6 38 1 11 56

2.50 8.39 0.37 4.80---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 20 33 22 19 94

8.33 7.28 8.21 8.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 5 17 2 13 37

2.08 3.75 0.75 5.68---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 9 2 13 16 40

3.75 0.44 4.85 6.99---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 8 13 2 7 30

3.33 2.87 0.75 3.06---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 1 13 0 2 16

0.42 2.87 0.00 0.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 4 14 0 3 21

1.67 3.09 0.00 1.31

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

75

Page 77: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 12 13 6 10 41

5.00 2.87 2.24 4.37---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 5 11 6 2 24

2.08 2.43 2.24 0.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 6 3 8 2 19

2.50 0.66 2.99 0.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 4 4 1 2 11

1.67 0.88 0.37 0.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 1 2 2 2 7

0.42 0.44 0.75 0.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 0 16 1 2 19

0.00 3.53 0.37 0.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 10 6 6 2 24

4.17 1.32 2.24 0.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 1 0 1 3

0.42 0.22 0.00 0.44---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 1 0 1 3

0.42 0.22 0.00 0.44---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 3 1 0 1 5

1.25 0.22 0.00 0.44---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 6 0 0 6

0.00 1.32 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 9 2 4 1 16

3.75 0.44 1.49 0.44

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

76

Page 78: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 2 9 0 6 17

0.83 1.99 0.00 2.62---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 5 0 1 0 6

2.08 0.00 0.37 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 1 0 1

0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 1 4 0 1 6

0.42 0.88 0.00 0.44---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 453 268 229 1190

20.17 38.07 22.52 19.24===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 5 53 48 15 42 19 182

12.50 15.06 14.68 13.16 17.14 16.81----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 7 58 47 18 33 13 176

17.50 16.48 14.37 15.79 13.47 11.50----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 3 39 19 12 9 4 86

7.50 11.08 5.81 10.53 3.67 3.54----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 2 25 36 9 34 13 119

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

77

Page 79: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

5.00 7.10 11.01 7.89 13.88 11.50----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 1 9 15 4 19 12 60

2.50 2.56 4.59 3.51 7.76 10.62----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 1 22 24 4 10 4 65

2.50 6.25 7.34 3.51 4.08 3.54----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 0 16 21 6 9 3 55

0.00 4.55 6.42 5.26 3.67 2.65----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 5 21 22 11 22 12 93

12.50 5.97 6.73 9.65 8.98 10.62----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 2 11 14 3 7 0 37

5.00 3.12 4.28 2.63 2.86 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 1 14 7 2 10 6 40

2.50 3.98 2.14 1.75 4.08 5.31----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 1 15 8 5 1 0 30

2.50 4.26 2.45 4.39 0.41 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 1 1 0 1 7 6 16

2.50 0.28 0.00 0.88 2.86 5.31----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 0 5 2 3 5 6 21

0.00 1.42 0.61 2.63 2.04 5.31----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 4 16 13 3 4 1 41

10.00 4.55 3.98 2.63 1.63 0.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 4 7 10 0 2 1 24

10.00 1.99 3.06 0.00 0.82 0.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 0 6 6 5 2 0 19

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

78

Page 80: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 1.70 1.83 4.39 0.82 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 2 3 4 1 1 0 11

5.00 0.85 1.22 0.88 0.41 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 0 0 3 0 2 2 7

0.00 0.00 0.92 0.00 0.82 1.77----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 1 2 3 3 8 3 20

2.50 0.57 0.92 2.63 3.27 2.65----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 0 8 6 3 4 4 25

0.00 2.27 1.83 2.63 1.63 3.54----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 0 1 2 0 0 1 4

0.00 0.28 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 1 2 0 0 0 3

0.00 0.28 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 0 3 1 0 1 0 5

0.00 0.85 0.31 0.00 0.41 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 0 2 1 1 1 5

0.00 0.00 0.61 0.88 0.41 0.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 0 8 2 0 5 1 16

0.00 2.27 0.61 0.00 2.04 0.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 0 5 3 2 5 1 16

0.00 1.42 0.92 1.75 2.04 0.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 1 4 0 2 0 7

0.00 0.28 1.22 0.00 0.82 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

79

Page 81: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 0 1 3 3 0 0 7

0.00 0.28 0.92 2.63 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 352 327 114 245 113 1191

3.36 29.55 27.46 9.57 20.57 9.49======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 24 52 21 41 41 179

13.04 19.62 15.79 14.64 12.54-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 30 51 16 42 37 176

16.30 19.25 12.03 15.00 11.31-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 8 20 10 29 20 87

4.35 7.55 7.52 10.36 6.12-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 10 7 9 42 50 118

5.43 2.64 6.77 15.00 15.29-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 4 17 8 17 15 61

2.17 6.42 6.02 6.07 4.59-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 10 7 7 20 21 65

5.43 2.64 5.26 7.14 6.42-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

80

Page 82: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Health care 6 16 5 9 20 563.26 6.04 3.76 3.21 6.12

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 13 23 2 26 29 93

7.07 8.68 1.50 9.29 8.87-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 8 11 5 7 7 38

4.35 4.15 3.76 2.50 2.14-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 21 7 4 4 4 40

11.41 2.64 3.01 1.43 1.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 9 6 5 2 8 30

4.89 2.26 3.76 0.71 2.45-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 2 2 4 2 6 16

1.09 0.75 3.01 0.71 1.83-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 5 1 3 3 9 21

2.72 0.38 2.26 1.07 2.75-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 11 13 6 8 4 42

5.98 4.91 4.51 2.86 1.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 3 6 5 6 4 24

1.63 2.26 3.76 2.14 1.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 1 6 4 1 8 20

0.54 2.26 3.01 0.36 2.45-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 3 1 0 1 4 9

1.63 0.38 0.00 0.36 1.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 0 1 2 2 3 8

0.00 0.38 1.50 0.71 0.92-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

81

Page 83: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Environment 1 2 1 3 12 190.54 0.75 0.75 1.07 3.67

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 4 4 5 3 8 24

2.17 1.51 3.76 1.07 2.45-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 1 0 1 0 3

0.54 0.38 0.00 0.36 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 0 0 0 2 3

0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 1 1 0 3 0 5

0.54 0.38 0.00 1.07 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 2 1 2 1 6

0.00 0.75 0.75 0.71 0.31-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 4 6 2 1 2 15

2.17 2.26 1.50 0.36 0.61-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 2 2 1 4 8 17

1.09 0.75 0.75 1.43 2.45-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 0 5 1 1 7

0.00 0.00 3.76 0.36 0.31-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 1 0 0 1

0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 2 0 1 0 3 6

1.09 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.92-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 184 265 133 280 327 1189

15.48 22.29 11.19 23.55 27.50=====================================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

82

Page 84: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA ge Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 125 13 29 7 1 4 3 182

17.53 8.44 10.82 31.82 25.00 30.77 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 144 4 21 0 2 1 5 177

20.20 2.60 7.84 0.00 50.00 7.69 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 22 33 25 7 0 0 0 87

3.09 21.43 9.33 31.82 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 69 15 26 3 0 2 3 118

9.68 9.74 9.70 13.64 0.00 15.38 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 34 4 20 1 0 1 0 60

4.77 2.60 7.46 4.55 0.00 7.69 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 29 9 25 1 0 0 0 64

4.07 5.84 9.33 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 27 17 12 0 0 0 0 56

3.79 11.04 4.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 70 8 13 1 0 1 1 94

9.82 5.19 4.85 4.55 0.00 7.69 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 14 5 15 1 0 2 0 37

1.96 3.25 5.60 4.55 0.00 15.38 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

83

Page 85: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 32 2 3 0 0 0 2 39

4.49 1.30 1.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 11 4 15 0 0 0 0 30

1.54 2.60 5.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 10 2 3 0 0 1 0 16

1.40 1.30 1.12 0.00 0.00 7.69 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 11 6 4 0 0 0 0 21

1.54 3.90 1.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 13 9 17 1 0 1 0 41

1.82 5.84 6.34 4.55 0.00 7.69 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 9 3 11 0 0 0 0 23

1.26 1.95 4.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 14 5 1 0 0 0 0 20

1.96 3.25 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 6 1 2 0 1 0 0 10

0.84 0.65 0.75 0.00 25.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 8

0.84 1.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 16 2 1 0 0 0 0 19

2.24 1.30 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 11 0 12 0 0 0 0 23

1.54 0.00 4.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 4

0.28 0.65 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

84

Page 86: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 4

0.00 0.65 1.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 7

0.42 1.30 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 15

2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 7 4 6 0 0 0 0 17

0.98 2.60 2.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 6

0.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 7

0.56 1.30 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 713 154 268 22 4 13 14 1188

60.02 12.96 22.56 1.85 0.34 1.09 1.18============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

85

Page 87: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 117 3 23 8 21 9 181

18.28 13.04 15.44 12.12 8.40 15.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 106 2 15 19 28 5 175

16.56 8.70 10.07 28.79 11.20 8.77---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 31 3 9 2 38 4 87

4.84 13.04 6.04 3.03 15.20 7.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 45 1 34 5 24 8 117

7.03 4.35 22.82 7.58 9.60 14.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 32 0 10 5 10 3 60

5.00 0.00 6.71 7.58 4.00 5.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 32 3 3 3 14 9 64

5.00 13.04 2.01 4.55 5.60 15.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 26 1 9 4 13 3 56

4.06 4.35 6.04 6.06 5.20 5.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 55 3 4 3 25 3 93

8.59 13.04 2.68 4.55 10.00 5.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 20 1 7 3 4 4 39

3.12 4.35 4.70 4.55 1.60 7.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 29 0 6 2 3 0 40

4.53 0.00 4.03 3.03 1.20 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 16 0 3 2 8 0 29

2.50 0.00 2.01 3.03 3.20 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 8 0 2 0 5 0 15

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

86

Page 88: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.25 0.00 1.34 0.00 2.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 14 0 3 0 4 0 21

2.19 0.00 2.01 0.00 1.60 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 21 3 5 1 12 0 42

3.28 13.04 3.36 1.52 4.80 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 15 1 3 1 2 1 23

2.34 4.35 2.01 1.52 0.80 1.75---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 12 0 4 0 2 2 20

1.88 0.00 2.68 0.00 0.80 3.51---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 4 1 0 0 5 0 10

0.62 4.35 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 4 0 0 0 3 0 7

0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 9 0 2 0 7 1 19

1.41 0.00 1.34 0.00 2.80 1.75---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 8 0 1 4 9 3 25

1.25 0.00 0.67 6.06 3.60 5.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 3 0 0 1 0 0 4

0.47 0.00 0.00 1.52 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 0 0 0 1 0 2

0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 4 0 0 0 1 0 5

0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 5 0 0 0 0 1 6

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

87

Page 89: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.75---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 6 0 0 0 9 0 15

0.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.60 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 9 1 4 2 1 0 17

1.41 4.35 2.68 3.03 0.40 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 3 0 2 1 0 0 6

0.47 0.00 1.34 1.52 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 4 0 0 0 1 1 6

0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 1.75---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 640 23 149 66 250 57 1185

54.01 1.94 12.57 5.57 21.10 4.81=====================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------------------Immigration 95 87 182

17.03 13.77-----------------------------------------------------------Border security 85 91 176

15.23 14.40-----------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

88

Page 90: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Unemployment/jobs 38 48 866.81 7.59

-----------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 72 46 118

12.90 7.28-----------------------------------------------------------Education 16 45 61

2.87 7.12-----------------------------------------------------------The economy 22 43 65

3.94 6.80-----------------------------------------------------------Health care 21 34 55

3.76 5.38-----------------------------------------------------------Water supply 51 43 94

9.14 6.80-----------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 9 28 37

1.61 4.43-----------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 14 26 40

2.51 4.11-----------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 10 20 30

1.79 3.16-----------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 9 7 16

1.61 1.11-----------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 9 12 21

1.61 1.90-----------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 21 21 42

3.76 3.32-----------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

89

Page 91: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

State government spending 11 13 241.97 2.06

-----------------------------------------------------------Taxes 12 8 20

2.15 1.27-----------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 4 6 10

0.72 0.95-----------------------------------------------------------Energy 5 3 8

0.90 0.47-----------------------------------------------------------Environment 10 9 19

1.79 1.42-----------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 14 10 24

2.51 1.58-----------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 2 3

0.18 0.32-----------------------------------------------------------Housing 2 1 3

0.36 0.16-----------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 4 1 5

0.72 0.16-----------------------------------------------------------Voting system 1 5 6

0.18 0.79-----------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 9 6 15

1.61 0.95-----------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 4 12 16

0.72 1.90-----------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

90

Page 92: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

The media 3 3 60.54 0.47

-----------------------------------------------------------State courts 1 0 1

0.18 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 5 2 7

0.90 0.32-----------------------------------------------------------Total 558 632 1190

46.89 53.11===========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 44 95 43 182

12.46 16.13 17.34---------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 32 104 40 176

9.07 17.66 16.13---------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 28 46 12 86

7.93 7.81 4.84---------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 44 60 15 119

12.46 10.19 6.05---------------------------------------------------------------------Education 21 33 7 61

5.95 5.60 2.82

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

91

Page 93: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 16 34 15 65

4.53 5.77 6.05---------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 26 18 11 55

7.37 3.06 4.44---------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 22 40 32 94

6.23 6.79 12.90---------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 17 16 4 37

4.82 2.72 1.61---------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 8 21 10 39

2.27 3.57 4.03---------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 9 19 3 31

2.55 3.23 1.21---------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 8 7 1 16

2.27 1.19 0.40---------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 2 11 8 21

0.57 1.87 3.23---------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 14 16 11 41

3.97 2.72 4.44---------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 9 7 7 23

2.55 1.19 2.82---------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 7 9 4 20

1.98 1.53 1.61---------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 7 3 1 11

1.98 0.51 0.40

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

92

Page 94: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 0 7 0 7

0.00 1.19 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 9 8 2 19

2.55 1.36 0.81---------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 10 11 3 24

2.83 1.87 1.21---------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 2 1 4

0.28 0.34 0.40---------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 0 1 2

0.28 0.00 0.40---------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 4 0 1 5

1.13 0.00 0.40---------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 3 2 2 7

0.85 0.34 0.81---------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 1 4 10 15

0.28 0.68 4.03---------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 5 9 2 16

1.42 1.53 0.81---------------------------------------------------------------------The media 2 4 0 6

0.57 0.68 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.40---------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 3 3 1 7

0.85 0.51 0.40

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

93

Page 95: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 353 589 248 1190

29.66 49.50 20.84=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 37 54 24 13 54 182

14.68 14.67 20.51 12.15 15.56----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 37 55 19 8 58 177

14.68 14.95 16.24 7.48 16.71----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 13 27 2 9 35 86

5.16 7.34 1.71 8.41 10.09----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 28 42 9 13 26 118

11.11 11.41 7.69 12.15 7.49----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 12 25 7 7 11 62

4.76 6.79 5.98 6.54 3.17----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 11 32 4 4 14 65

4.37 8.70 3.42 3.74 4.03----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 15 9 4 9 18 55

5.95 2.45 3.42 8.41 5.19----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 4 28 5 15 41 93

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

94

Page 96: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.59 7.61 4.27 14.02 11.82----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 14 8 7 2 6 37

5.56 2.17 5.98 1.87 1.73----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 4 12 1 3 19 39

1.59 3.26 0.85 2.80 5.48----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 6 11 7 1 6 31

2.38 2.99 5.98 0.93 1.73----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 3 5 3 2 3 16

1.19 1.36 2.56 1.87 0.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 10 1 3 2 5 21

3.97 0.27 2.56 1.87 1.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 10 9 6 0 15 40

3.97 2.45 5.13 0.00 4.32----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 8 4 2 4 6 24

3.17 1.09 1.71 3.74 1.73----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 11 1 2 2 4 20

4.37 0.27 1.71 1.87 1.15----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 5 5 0 0 1 11

1.98 1.36 0.00 0.00 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 2 5 0 0 0 7

0.79 1.36 0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 3 6 0 5 5 19

1.19 1.63 0.00 4.67 1.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 12 3 4 2 4 25

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

95

Page 97: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

4.76 0.82 3.42 1.87 1.15----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 2 0 0 1 4

0.40 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 0 0 1 1 2

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.93 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 0 1 3 0 1 5

0.00 0.27 2.56 0.00 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 1 0 1 1 3 6

0.40 0.00 0.85 0.93 0.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 2 7 0 1 6 16

0.79 1.90 0.00 0.93 1.73----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 3 8 2 1 2 16

1.19 2.17 1.71 0.93 0.58----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 6 0 0 0 6

0.00 1.63 0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 0 2 2 2 1 7

0.00 0.54 1.71 1.87 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 252 368 117 107 347 1191

21.16 30.90 9.82 8.98 29.14========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

96

Page 98: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==========================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 23 34 97 27 181

11.86 10.97 21.09 11.84--------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 11 34 81 52 178

5.67 10.97 17.61 22.81--------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 28 28 25 5 86

14.43 9.03 5.43 2.19--------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 10 28 59 22 119

5.15 9.03 12.83 9.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 17 13 22 9 61

8.76 4.19 4.78 3.95--------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 17 21 19 8 65

8.76 6.77 4.13 3.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 7 17 21 12 57

3.61 5.48 4.57 5.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 18 24 26 25 93

9.28 7.74 5.65 10.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 9 11 12 5 37

4.64 3.55 2.61 2.19--------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 3 11 11 14 39

1.55 3.55 2.39 6.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

97

Page 99: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Social welfare programs 6 8 4 11 293.09 2.58 0.87 4.82

--------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 1 7 7 1 16

0.52 2.26 1.52 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 0 5 8 8 21

0.00 1.61 1.74 3.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 10 17 12 2 41

5.15 5.48 2.61 0.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 1 11 8 3 23

0.52 3.55 1.74 1.32--------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 3 3 14 0 20

1.55 0.97 3.04 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 6 1 3 1 11

3.09 0.32 0.65 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 4 2 2 0 8

2.06 0.65 0.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 3 2 10 4 19

1.55 0.65 2.17 1.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 6 9 4 5 24

3.09 2.90 0.87 2.19--------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 0 2 1 4

0.52 0.00 0.43 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 2 0 0 1 3

1.03 0.00 0.00 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

98

Page 100: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Insurance rates 0 2 0 3 50.00 0.65 0.00 1.32

--------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 2 2 2 6

0.00 0.65 0.43 0.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 4 7 4 1 16

2.06 2.26 0.87 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 3 7 3 3 16

1.55 2.26 0.65 1.32--------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 3 2 1 6

0.00 0.97 0.43 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 1 3 2 1 7

0.52 0.97 0.43 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 194 310 460 228 1192

16.28 26.01 38.59 19.13==========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

99

Page 101: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q6. Obama Approval

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 27 54 27 68 7 6 11 200

43.55 51.43 28.12 18.89 5.60 2.59 5.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 25 43 43 105 15 5 6 242

40.32 40.95 44.79 29.17 12.00 2.16 2.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

100

Page 102: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Neither approve nor disapprove 5 4 5 42 4 2 6 688.06 3.81 5.21 11.67 3.20 0.86 2.75

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 2 3 13 42 12 19 6 97

3.23 2.86 13.54 11.67 9.60 8.19 2.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 2 1 8 95 82 199 189 576

3.23 0.95 8.33 26.39 65.60 85.78 86.70--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 1 0 0 8 5 1 0 15

1.61 0.00 0.00 2.22 4.00 0.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 105 96 360 125 232 218 1198

5.18 8.76 8.01 30.05 10.43 19.37 18.20============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 108 68 24 200

41.22 18.89 4.17------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 110 105 26 241

41.98 29.17 4.52------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 15 42 12 69

5.73 11.67 2.09------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 18 42 37 97

6.87 11.67 6.43

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

101

Page 103: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 10 95 470 575

3.82 26.39 81.74------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 1 8 6 15

0.38 2.22 1.04------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 360 575 1197

21.89 30.08 48.04==============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 126 25 32 14 0 3 0 200

49.22 21.93 26.67 12.17 0.00 2.42 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 91 49 60 11 3 9 6 229

35.55 42.98 50.00 9.57 2.48 7.26 2.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 13 14 7 13 1 6 6 60

5.08 12.28 5.83 11.30 0.83 4.84 2.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 20 12 9 14 9 15 15 94

7.81 10.53 7.50 12.17 7.44 12.10 5.05---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 1 14 12 61 108 89 270 555

0.39 12.28 10.00 53.04 89.26 71.77 90.91---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 5 0 0 2 0 2 0 9

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

102

Page 104: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.95 0.00 0.00 1.74 0.00 1.61 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 114 120 115 121 124 297 1147

22.32 9.94 10.46 10.03 10.55 10.81 25.89=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 183 14 3 200

37.50 12.17 0.55--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 199 11 18 228

40.78 9.57 3.32--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 34 13 13 60

6.97 11.30 2.40--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 40 14 39 93

8.20 12.17 7.20--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 27 61 467 555

5.53 53.04 86.16--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 5 2 2 9

1.02 1.74 0.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 115 542 1145

42.62 10.04 47.34================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

103

Page 105: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 2 176 0 22 200

0.84 38.77 0.00 9.24------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 11 198 4 28 241

4.60 43.61 1.50 11.76------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 16 26 1 24 67

6.69 5.73 0.38 10.08------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 34 35 6 24 99

14.23 7.71 2.26 10.08------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 176 15 255 129 575

73.64 3.30 95.86 54.20------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 4 0 11 15

0.00 0.88 0.00 4.62------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 239 454 266 238 1197

19.97 37.93 22.22 19.88========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

104

Page 106: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

===================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 1 45 66 19 42 28 201

2.50 12.82 19.82 16.52 17.07 24.35-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 11 68 50 27 64 22 242

27.50 19.37 15.02 23.48 26.02 19.13-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 2 26 19 6 10 5 68

5.00 7.41 5.71 5.22 4.07 4.35-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 4 38 35 8 9 4 98

10.00 10.83 10.51 6.96 3.66 3.48-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 18 171 156 54 121 56 576

45.00 48.72 46.85 46.96 49.19 48.70-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 3 7 1 0 0 15

10.00 0.85 2.10 0.87 0.00 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 351 333 115 246 115 1200

3.33 29.25 27.75 9.58 20.50 9.58===================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

105

Page 107: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Approve strongly 27 27 16 56 74 20014.44 10.19 12.21 19.93 22.56

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 20 34 32 55 101 242

10.70 12.83 24.43 19.57 30.79----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 6 18 9 17 18 68

3.21 6.79 6.87 6.05 5.49----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 19 22 9 27 20 97

10.16 8.30 6.87 9.61 6.10----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 111 163 62 125 110 571

59.36 61.51 47.33 44.48 33.54----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 1 3 1 5 14

2.14 0.38 2.29 0.36 1.52----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 265 131 281 328 1192

15.69 22.23 10.99 23.57 27.52==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 80 70 48 2 0 1 0 201

11.16 44.87 17.71 9.09 0.00 7.14 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 114 47 71 3 0 3 3 241

15.90 30.13 26.20 13.64 0.00 21.43 21.43

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

106

Page 108: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 28 17 19 3 0 1 0 68

3.91 10.90 7.01 13.64 0.00 7.14 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 45 11 31 9 0 2 0 98

6.28 7.05 11.44 40.91 0.00 14.29 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 447 6 95 5 4 7 11 575

62.34 3.85 35.06 22.73 100.00 50.00 78.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 5 7 0 0 0 0 15

0.42 3.21 2.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 717 156 271 22 4 14 14 1198

59.85 13.02 22.62 1.84 0.33 1.17 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 87 3 30 10 56 15 201

13.43 13.04 19.87 15.38 21.96 25.86------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 108 3 38 9 66 18 242

16.67 13.04 25.17 13.85 25.88 31.03------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 27 3 12 2 17 7 68

4.17 13.04 7.95 3.08 6.67 12.07------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 42 1 14 4 34 3 98

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

107

Page 109: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

6.48 4.35 9.27 6.15 13.33 5.17------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 374 12 57 40 77 15 575

57.72 52.17 37.75 61.54 30.20 25.86------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 10 1 0 0 5 0 16

1.54 4.35 0.00 0.00 1.96 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 23 151 65 255 58 1200

54.00 1.92 12.58 5.42 21.25 4.83==================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total--------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 88 113 201

15.69 17.71--------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 112 130 242

19.96 20.38--------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 23 45 68

4.10 7.05--------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 40 58 98

7.13 9.09--------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 292 283 575

52.05 44.36--------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

108

Page 110: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 6 9 151.07 1.41

--------------------------------------------------------Total 561 638 1199

46.79 53.21========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 85 93 22 200

23.88 15.76 8.87------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 94 122 26 242

26.40 20.68 10.48------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 27 27 14 68

7.58 4.58 5.65------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 33 43 22 98

9.27 7.29 8.87------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 113 299 162 574

31.74 50.68 65.32------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 6 2 12

1.12 1.02 0.81------------------------------------------------------------------Total 356 590 248 1194

29.82 49.41 20.77

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

109

Page 111: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 54 64 15 26 42 201

21.60 17.39 12.20 24.30 11.97-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 46 90 19 33 53 241

18.40 24.46 15.45 30.84 15.10-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 14 19 14 7 14 68

5.60 5.16 11.38 6.54 3.99-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 21 25 10 7 35 98

8.40 6.79 8.13 6.54 9.97-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 114 166 62 33 201 576

45.60 45.11 50.41 30.84 57.26-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 1 4 3 1 6 15

0.40 1.09 2.44 0.93 1.71-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 368 123 107 351 1199

20.85 30.69 10.26 8.92 29.27=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

110

Page 112: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=======================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 29 61 80 30 200

14.57 19.37 17.43 13.27-----------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 44 66 99 33 242

22.11 20.95 21.57 14.60-----------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 19 28 17 4 68

9.55 8.89 3.70 1.77-----------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 32 31 26 9 98

16.08 9.84 5.66 3.98-----------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 67 127 232 150 576

33.67 40.32 50.54 66.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 2 5 0 15

4.02 0.63 1.09 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 199 315 459 226 1199

16.60 26.27 38.28 18.85=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

111

Page 113: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q7. Congress Approval

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 7 1 0 6 2 5 13 34

11.11 0.98 0.00 1.67 1.63 2.19 5.99--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 2 6 7 41 12 13 13 94

3.17 5.88 7.29 11.39 9.76 5.70 5.99--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

112

Page 114: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Neither approve nor disapprove 3 15 16 74 11 31 25 1754.76 14.71 16.67 20.56 8.94 13.60 11.52

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 10 18 11 68 35 75 60 277

15.87 17.65 11.46 18.89 28.46 32.89 27.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 40 61 60 152 58 102 104 577

63.49 59.80 62.50 42.22 47.15 44.74 47.93--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 1 1 2 19 5 2 2 32

1.59 0.98 2.08 5.28 4.07 0.88 0.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 102 96 360 123 228 217 1189

5.30 8.58 8.07 30.28 10.34 19.18 18.25============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 8 6 20 34

3.07 1.67 3.51------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 15 41 38 94

5.75 11.39 6.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 34 74 68 176

13.03 20.56 11.93------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 39 68 171 278

14.94 18.89 30.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

113

Page 115: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 162 152 264 578

62.07 42.22 46.32------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 19 9 31

1.15 5.28 1.58------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 360 570 1191

21.91 30.23 47.86==============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 23 1 1 1 0 1 6 33

9.20 0.88 0.85 0.89 0.00 0.80 2.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 30 18 5 7 5 6 19 90

12.00 15.79 4.27 6.25 4.17 4.80 6.40---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 41 20 11 16 13 22 35 158

16.40 17.54 9.40 14.29 10.83 17.60 11.78---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 35 23 15 23 32 40 99 267

14.00 20.18 12.82 20.54 26.67 32.00 33.33---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 114 45 85 63 70 54 135 566

45.60 39.47 72.65 56.25 58.33 43.20 45.45---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 7 0 2 0 2 3 21

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

114

Page 116: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

2.80 6.14 0.00 1.79 0.00 1.60 1.01---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 114 117 112 120 125 297 1135

22.03 10.04 10.31 9.87 10.57 11.01 26.17=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 26 1 8 35

5.39 0.89 1.47--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 52 7 30 89

10.79 6.25 5.52--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 72 16 70 158

14.94 14.29 12.89--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 74 23 171 268

15.35 20.54 31.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 244 63 258 565

50.62 56.25 47.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 14 2 6 22

2.90 1.79 1.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 482 112 543 1137

42.39 9.85 47.76================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

115

Page 117: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 5 23 2 5 35

2.07 5.12 0.75 2.11------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 21 49 15 11 96

8.71 10.91 5.64 4.64------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 43 57 22 53 175

17.84 12.69 8.27 22.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 74 67 80 59 280

30.71 14.92 30.08 24.89------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 96 247 147 87 577

39.83 55.01 55.26 36.71------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 2 6 0 22 30

0.83 1.34 0.00 9.28------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 449 266 237 1193

20.20 37.64 22.30 19.87========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

116

Page 118: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

===================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 0 16 15 2 1 0 34

0.00 4.55 4.56 1.82 0.40 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 3 25 28 8 25 6 95

7.32 7.10 8.51 7.27 10.12 5.26-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 5 69 44 17 33 8 176

12.20 19.60 13.37 15.45 13.36 7.02-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 13 64 91 35 50 28 281

31.71 18.18 27.66 31.82 20.24 24.56-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 16 166 142 46 135 71 576

39.02 47.16 43.16 41.82 54.66 62.28-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 12 9 2 3 1 31

9.76 3.41 2.74 1.82 1.21 0.88-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 329 110 247 114 1193

3.44 29.51 27.58 9.22 20.70 9.56===================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

117

Page 119: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Approve strongly 7 6 2 6 13 343.80 2.26 1.54 2.13 3.98

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 16 24 18 21 16 95

8.70 9.06 13.85 7.45 4.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 28 42 30 34 40 174

15.22 15.85 23.08 12.06 12.23----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 57 82 21 60 60 280

30.98 30.94 16.15 21.28 18.35----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 69 107 55 159 184 574

37.50 40.38 42.31 56.38 56.27----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 4 4 2 14 31

3.80 1.51 3.08 0.71 4.28----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 184 265 130 282 327 1188

15.49 22.31 10.94 23.74 27.53==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 14 9 8 2 0 0 1 34

1.95 6.08 2.94 9.09 0.00 0.00 7.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 33 25 28 7 0 1 1 95

4.60 16.89 10.29 31.82 0.00 7.69 7.69

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

118

Page 120: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 78 34 59 2 1 1 0 175

10.86 22.97 21.69 9.09 25.00 7.69 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 191 22 54 6 2 4 1 280

26.60 14.86 19.85 27.27 50.00 30.77 7.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 390 51 113 5 1 7 10 577

54.32 34.46 41.54 22.73 25.00 53.85 76.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 12 7 10 0 0 0 0 29

1.67 4.73 3.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 148 272 22 4 13 13 1190

60.34 12.44 22.86 1.85 0.34 1.09 1.09============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 9 1 0 0 24 0 34

1.39 4.35 0.00 0.00 9.64 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 38 2 10 4 38 4 96

5.87 8.70 6.71 6.15 15.26 6.90------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 84 8 22 6 47 7 174

12.98 34.78 14.77 9.23 18.88 12.07------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 173 4 35 20 38 11 281

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

119

Page 121: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

26.74 17.39 23.49 30.77 15.26 18.97------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 326 8 79 33 96 34 576

50.39 34.78 53.02 50.77 38.55 58.62------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 17 0 3 2 6 2 30

2.63 0.00 2.01 3.08 2.41 3.45------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 647 23 149 65 249 58 1191

54.32 1.93 12.51 5.46 20.91 4.87==================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total--------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 22 12 34

3.96 1.89--------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 41 54 95

7.39 8.49--------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 62 113 175

11.17 17.77--------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 117 163 280

21.08 25.63--------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 305 272 577

54.95 42.77--------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

120

Page 122: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 8 22 301.44 3.46

--------------------------------------------------------Total 555 636 1191

46.60 53.40========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 17 10 7 34

4.75 1.71 2.86------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 32 46 16 94

8.94 7.86 6.53------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 67 59 50 176

18.72 10.09 20.41------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 78 140 62 280

21.79 23.93 25.31------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 152 319 106 577

42.46 54.53 43.27------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 12 11 4 27

3.35 1.88 1.63------------------------------------------------------------------Total 358 585 245 1188

30.13 49.24 20.62

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

121

Page 123: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 5 13 0 5 12 35

1.99 3.58 0.00 4.59 3.43-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 29 22 5 4 34 94

11.55 6.06 4.10 3.67 9.71-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 38 47 28 12 51 176

15.14 12.95 22.95 11.01 14.57-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 55 83 26 26 91 281

21.91 22.87 21.31 23.85 26.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 121 189 56 57 155 578

48.21 52.07 45.90 52.29 44.29-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 9 7 5 7 31

1.20 2.48 5.74 4.59 2.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 363 122 109 350 1195

21.00 30.38 10.21 9.12 29.29=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

122

Page 124: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=======================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 16 11 6 1 34

8.21 3.55 1.30 0.44-----------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 33 25 30 7 95

16.92 8.06 6.52 3.08-----------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 41 65 49 21 176

21.03 20.97 10.65 9.25-----------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 44 70 114 52 280

22.56 22.58 24.78 22.91-----------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 53 126 255 143 577

27.18 40.65 55.43 63.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 13 6 3 30

4.10 4.19 1.30 1.32-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 195 310 460 227 1192

16.36 26.01 38.59 19.04=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

123

Page 125: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q8. Rick Perry Approval

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 8 3 2 25 22 81 99 240

12.70 2.91 2.08 6.93 17.60 35.06 45.21--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 1 8 5 71 42 101 71 299

1.59 7.77 5.21 19.67 33.60 43.72 32.42--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

124

Page 126: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Neither approve nor disapprove 6 4 18 92 28 27 22 1979.52 3.88 18.75 25.48 22.40 11.69 10.05

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 3 13 12 52 13 10 16 119

4.76 12.62 12.50 14.40 10.40 4.33 7.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 45 68 54 94 15 11 10 297

71.43 66.02 56.25 26.04 12.00 4.76 4.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 7 5 27 5 1 1 46

0.00 6.80 5.21 7.48 4.00 0.43 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 96 361 125 231 219 1198

5.26 8.60 8.01 30.13 10.43 19.28 18.28============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 13 25 202 240

4.96 6.93 35.19------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 14 71 214 299

5.34 19.67 37.28------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 27 92 77 196

10.31 25.48 13.41------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 28 52 39 119

10.69 14.40 6.79

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

125

Page 127: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 167 94 35 296

63.74 26.04 6.10------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 27 7 47

4.96 7.48 1.22------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 361 574 1197

21.89 30.16 47.95==============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 24 5 3 13 36 23 129 233

9.38 4.42 2.52 11.61 29.75 18.55 43.43---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 25 11 11 18 53 50 116 284

9.77 9.73 9.24 16.07 43.80 40.32 39.06---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 30 32 17 34 14 29 28 184

11.72 28.32 14.29 30.36 11.57 23.39 9.43---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 28 20 14 17 11 12 14 116

10.94 17.70 11.76 15.18 9.09 9.68 4.71---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 141 40 74 16 4 8 9 292

55.08 35.40 62.18 14.29 3.31 6.45 3.03---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 5 0 14 3 2 1 33

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

126

Page 128: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

3.12 4.42 0.00 12.50 2.48 1.61 0.34---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 113 119 112 121 124 297 1142

22.42 9.89 10.42 9.81 10.60 10.86 26.01=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 32 13 188 233

6.54 11.61 34.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 47 18 219 284

9.61 16.07 40.41--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 80 34 71 185

16.36 30.36 13.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 62 17 37 116

12.68 15.18 6.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 255 16 21 292

52.15 14.29 3.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 14 6 33

2.66 12.50 1.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 489 112 542 1143

42.78 9.80 47.42================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

127

Page 129: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 69 27 98 45 239

28.87 5.93 36.84 18.91------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 81 43 117 59 300

33.89 9.45 43.98 24.79------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 49 63 24 60 196

20.50 13.85 9.02 25.21------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 21 60 17 22 120

8.79 13.19 6.39 9.24------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 13 254 8 22 297

5.44 55.82 3.01 9.24------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 6 8 2 30 46

2.51 1.76 0.75 12.61------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 239 455 266 238 1198

19.95 37.98 22.20 19.87========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

128

Page 130: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

===================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 7 75 66 21 51 20 240

17.07 21.37 19.88 18.42 20.73 17.39-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 13 94 76 31 58 27 299

31.71 26.78 22.89 27.19 23.58 23.48-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 4 75 51 16 33 17 196

9.76 21.37 15.36 14.04 13.41 14.78-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 1 30 38 17 23 11 120

2.44 8.55 11.45 14.91 9.35 9.57-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 12 57 85 26 77 40 297

29.27 16.24 25.60 22.81 31.30 34.78-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 20 16 3 4 0 47

9.76 5.70 4.82 2.63 1.63 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 351 332 114 246 115 1199

3.42 29.27 27.69 9.51 20.52 9.59===================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

129

Page 131: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Approve strongly 67 60 28 39 44 23835.83 22.64 21.21 13.88 13.54

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 45 89 30 83 51 298

24.06 33.58 22.73 29.54 15.69----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 24 51 34 40 47 196

12.83 19.25 25.76 14.23 14.46----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 19 25 12 24 36 116

10.16 9.43 9.09 8.54 11.08----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 24 30 24 90 128 296

12.83 11.32 18.18 32.03 39.38----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 10 4 5 19 46

4.28 3.77 3.03 1.78 5.85----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 265 132 281 325 1190

15.71 22.27 11.09 23.61 27.31==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 174 11 42 4 2 2 5 240

24.34 7.05 15.44 17.39 50.00 16.67 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 201 16 62 11 0 5 4 299

28.11 10.26 22.79 47.83 0.00 41.67 28.57

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

130

Page 132: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 95 39 57 3 2 0 1 197

13.29 25.00 20.96 13.04 50.00 0.00 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 57 24 33 3 0 0 1 118

7.97 15.38 12.13 13.04 0.00 0.00 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 175 54 57 2 0 5 3 296

24.48 34.62 20.96 8.70 0.00 41.67 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 12 21 0 0 0 0 46

1.82 7.69 7.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 715 156 272 23 4 12 14 1196

59.78 13.04 22.74 1.92 0.33 1.00 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 148 3 16 14 51 6 238

22.95 13.04 10.67 21.54 20.08 10.53------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 180 6 29 23 48 12 298

27.91 26.09 19.33 35.38 18.90 21.05------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 101 4 27 9 46 9 196

15.66 17.39 18.00 13.85 18.11 15.79------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 65 1 21 6 22 4 119

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

131

Page 133: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

10.08 4.35 14.00 9.23 8.66 7.02------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 134 4 57 13 71 18 297

20.78 17.39 38.00 20.00 27.95 31.58------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 17 5 0 0 16 8 46

2.64 21.74 0.00 0.00 6.30 14.04------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 645 23 150 65 254 57 1194

54.02 1.93 12.56 5.44 21.27 4.77==================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total--------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 127 113 240

22.64 17.74--------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 135 164 299

24.06 25.75--------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 89 107 196

15.86 16.80--------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 55 65 120

9.80 10.20--------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 139 158 297

24.78 24.80--------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

132

Page 134: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 16 30 462.85 4.71

--------------------------------------------------------Total 561 637 1198

46.83 53.17========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 66 113 61 240

18.59 19.19 24.60------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 63 148 87 298

17.75 25.13 35.08------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 56 100 39 195

15.77 16.98 15.73------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 50 58 12 120

14.08 9.85 4.84------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 107 150 39 296

30.14 25.47 15.73------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 20 10 43

3.66 3.40 4.03------------------------------------------------------------------Total 355 589 248 1192

29.78 49.41 20.81

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

133

Page 135: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 44 72 29 13 81 239

17.67 19.62 23.77 12.15 23.14-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 58 85 32 16 107 298

23.29 23.16 26.23 14.95 30.57-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 44 60 18 15 58 195

17.67 16.35 14.75 14.02 16.57-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 30 38 11 18 23 120

12.05 10.35 9.02 16.82 6.57-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 65 98 28 43 63 297

26.10 26.70 22.95 40.19 18.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 14 4 2 18 46

3.21 3.81 3.28 1.87 5.14-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 249 367 122 107 350 1195

20.84 30.71 10.21 8.95 29.29=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

134

Page 136: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=======================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 24 56 105 54 239

12.12 17.95 22.88 24.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 46 73 109 70 298

23.23 23.40 23.75 31.11-----------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 50 60 62 24 196

25.25 19.23 13.51 10.67-----------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 29 26 44 20 119

14.65 8.33 9.59 8.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 30 77 134 55 296

15.15 24.68 29.19 24.44-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 19 20 5 2 46

9.60 6.41 1.09 0.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 312 459 225 1194

16.58 26.13 38.44 18.84=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

135

Page 137: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q9. Right Direction/Wrong Track, Country

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 24 66 37 108 18 9 10 272

39.34 64.08 38.54 30.17 14.52 3.91 4.61-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 23 21 40 173 93 216 202 768

37.70 20.39 41.67 48.32 75.00 93.91 93.09-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

136

Page 138: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 14 16 19 77 13 5 5 14922.95 15.53 19.79 21.51 10.48 2.17 2.30

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 61 103 96 358 124 230 217 1189

5.13 8.66 8.07 30.11 10.43 19.34 18.25=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 127 108 38 273

49.03 30.17 6.64---------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 83 173 511 767

32.05 48.32 89.34---------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 49 77 23 149

18.92 21.51 4.02---------------------------------------------------------------Total 259 358 572 1189

21.78 30.11 48.11===============================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

137

Page 139: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 135 40 54 17 5 7 8 266

52.94 35.40 45.76 15.18 4.10 5.65 2.72------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 69 48 45 81 113 104 281 741

27.06 42.48 38.14 72.32 92.62 83.87 95.58------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 51 25 19 14 4 13 5 131

20.00 22.12 16.10 12.50 3.28 10.48 1.70------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 113 118 112 122 124 294 1138

22.41 9.93 10.37 9.84 10.72 10.90 25.83==========================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 230 17 20 267

47.23 15.18 3.70-----------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 162 81 498 741

33.26 72.32 92.22-----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 95 14 22 131

19.51 12.50 4.07-----------------------------------------------------------------Total 487 112 540 1139

42.76 9.83 47.41=================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

138

Page 140: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 17 227 4 26 274

7.20 50.11 1.50 10.92---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 204 142 261 163 770

86.44 31.35 98.12 68.49---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 15 84 1 49 149

6.36 18.54 0.38 20.59---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 236 453 266 238 1193

19.78 37.97 22.30 19.95=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 8 79 74 25 65 23 274

19.51 22.51 22.42 21.93 26.42 20.35----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 23 234 209 74 153 78 771

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

139

Page 141: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

56.10 66.67 63.33 64.91 62.20 69.03----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 10 38 47 15 28 12 150

24.39 10.83 14.24 13.16 11.38 10.62----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 351 330 114 246 113 1195

3.43 29.37 27.62 9.54 20.59 9.46====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 34 43 27 76 94 274

18.18 16.17 20.61 27.34 28.75-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 142 198 82 169 175 766

75.94 74.44 62.60 60.79 53.52-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 11 25 22 33 58 149

5.88 9.40 16.79 11.87 17.74-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 266 131 278 327 1189

15.73 22.37 11.02 23.38 27.50===================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

140

Page 142: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=====================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 104 69 92 6 0 2 0 273

14.53 44.23 34.20 27.27 0.00 14.29 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 542 47 140 16 4 8 14 771

75.70 30.13 52.04 72.73 100.00 57.14 100.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 70 40 37 0 0 4 0 151

9.78 25.64 13.75 0.00 0.00 28.57 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 716 156 269 22 4 14 14 1195

59.92 13.05 22.51 1.84 0.33 1.17 1.17=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 123 2 37 13 78 21 274

18.98 8.70 24.50 20.00 31.20 36.84---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 462 19 90 43 132 23 769

71.30 82.61 59.60 66.15 52.80 40.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 63 2 24 9 40 13 151

9.72 8.70 15.89 13.85 16.00 22.81---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 23 151 65 250 57 1194

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

141

Page 143: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

54.27 1.93 12.65 5.44 20.94 4.77===================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------Right direction 133 141 274

23.79 22.17-----------------------------------------Wrong track 379 392 771

67.80 61.64-----------------------------------------Don't know 47 103 150

8.41 16.19-----------------------------------------Total 559 636 1195

46.78 53.22=========================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------Right direction 116 126 32 274

32.49 21.58 12.90

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

142

Page 144: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------Wrong track 182 396 191 769

50.98 67.81 77.02---------------------------------------------------Don't know 59 62 25 146

16.53 10.62 10.08---------------------------------------------------Total 357 584 248 1189

30.03 49.12 20.86===================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 66 96 20 35 57 274

26.29 26.16 16.39 33.02 16.38----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 161 217 91 49 252 770

64.14 59.13 74.59 46.23 72.41----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 54 11 22 39 150

9.56 14.71 9.02 20.75 11.21----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 367 122 106 348 1194

21.02 30.74 10.22 8.88 29.15======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

143

Page 145: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

========================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------Right direction 51 71 110 41 273

25.76 22.61 24.12 18.22--------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 110 202 287 171 770

55.56 64.33 62.94 76.00--------------------------------------------------------Don't know 37 41 59 13 150

18.69 13.06 12.94 5.78--------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 456 225 1193

16.60 26.32 38.22 18.86========================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

144

Page 146: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q10. National Economy: Better o↵/Worse O↵

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 15 10 9 32 5 4 9 84

24.19 9.71 9.28 8.91 4.03 1.72 4.13------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 24 64 54 84 24 26 7 283

38.71 62.14 55.67 23.40 19.35 11.21 3.21------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

145

Page 147: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

About the same 13 21 22 126 25 51 50 30820.97 20.39 22.68 35.10 20.16 21.98 22.94

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 4 8 6 77 46 86 71 298

6.45 7.77 6.19 21.45 37.10 37.07 32.57------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 6 0 5 28 21 62 74 196

9.68 0.00 5.15 7.80 16.94 26.72 33.94------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 0 1 12 3 3 7 26

0.00 0.00 1.03 3.34 2.42 1.29 3.21------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 97 359 124 232 218 1195

5.19 8.62 8.12 30.04 10.38 19.41 18.24==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 34 32 18 84

12.88 8.91 3.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 142 84 57 283

53.79 23.40 9.93----------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 56 126 126 308

21.21 35.10 21.95----------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 19 77 203 299

7.20 21.45 35.37

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

146

Page 148: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 11 28 157 196

4.17 7.80 27.35----------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 2 12 13 27

0.76 3.34 2.26----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 264 359 574 1197

22.06 29.99 47.95============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 54 7 16 2 2 0 1 82

21.18 6.14 13.33 1.79 1.67 0.00 0.34-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 109 42 64 19 9 12 23 278

42.75 36.84 53.33 16.96 7.50 9.76 7.72-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 43 45 23 41 25 40 71 288

16.86 39.47 19.17 36.61 20.83 32.52 23.83-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 33 16 16 31 50 40 99 285

12.94 14.04 13.33 27.68 41.67 32.52 33.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 8 3 1 18 34 26 99 189

3.14 2.63 0.83 16.07 28.33 21.14 33.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 1 0 1 0 5 5 20

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

147

Page 149: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

3.14 0.88 0.00 0.89 0.00 4.07 1.68-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 114 120 112 120 123 298 1142

22.33 9.98 10.51 9.81 10.51 10.77 26.09=======================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 77 2 3 82

15.75 1.79 0.55------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 214 19 44 277

43.76 16.96 8.12------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 111 41 137 289

22.70 36.61 25.28------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 65 31 189 285

13.29 27.68 34.87------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 13 18 159 190

2.66 16.07 29.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 9 1 10 20

1.84 0.89 1.85------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 489 112 542 1143

42.78 9.80 47.42==============================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

148

Page 150: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 5 72 0 6 83

2.07 15.93 0.00 2.53----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 32 217 10 24 283

13.28 48.01 3.75 10.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 79 94 56 78 307

32.78 20.80 20.97 32.91----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 70 51 100 79 300

29.05 11.28 37.45 33.33----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 52 11 98 35 196

21.58 2.43 36.70 14.77----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 7 3 15 28

1.24 1.55 1.12 6.33----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 452 267 237 1197

20.13 37.76 22.31 19.80======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

149

Page 151: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 4 23 24 9 14 9 83

9.52 6.50 7.25 7.89 5.69 7.83-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 1 66 84 25 71 36 283

2.38 18.64 25.38 21.93 28.86 31.30-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 15 105 84 32 47 25 308

35.71 29.66 25.38 28.07 19.11 21.74-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 14 97 73 26 70 23 303

33.33 27.40 22.05 22.81 28.46 20.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 4 58 52 20 42 21 197

9.52 16.38 15.71 17.54 17.07 18.26-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 5 14 2 2 1 28

9.52 1.41 4.23 1.75 0.81 0.87-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 42 354 331 114 246 115 1202

3.49 29.45 27.54 9.48 20.47 9.57=================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

150

Page 152: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

A lot better off 17 8 3 20 35 839.04 3.01 2.31 7.07 10.67

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 35 41 30 84 93 283

18.62 15.41 23.08 29.68 28.35--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 37 75 47 54 93 306

19.68 28.20 36.15 19.08 28.35--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 42 83 33 73 67 298

22.34 31.20 25.38 25.80 20.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 51 56 12 50 28 197

27.13 21.05 9.23 17.67 8.54--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 6 3 5 2 12 28

3.19 1.13 3.85 0.71 3.66--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 266 130 283 328 1195

15.73 22.26 10.88 23.68 27.45================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 38 22 22 1 0 0 0 83

5.29 14.29 8.12 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 140 60 72 5 0 4 0 281

19.50 38.96 26.57 22.73 0.00 30.77 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

151

Page 153: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 179 41 76 5 0 4 3 308

24.93 26.62 28.04 22.73 0.00 30.77 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 203 18 62 9 2 4 2 300

28.27 11.69 22.88 40.91 66.67 30.77 14.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 144 6 33 2 1 1 9 196

20.06 3.90 12.18 9.09 33.33 7.69 64.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 14 7 6 0 0 0 0 27

1.95 4.55 2.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 154 271 22 3 13 14 1195

60.08 12.89 22.68 1.84 0.25 1.09 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 31 2 4 3 39 5 84

4.78 8.33 2.65 4.69 15.35 8.77----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 134 4 52 14 65 14 283

20.65 16.67 34.44 21.88 25.59 24.56----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 168 10 34 16 56 23 307

25.89 41.67 22.52 25.00 22.05 40.35----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 167 3 39 20 61 11 301

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

152

Page 154: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

25.73 12.50 25.83 31.25 24.02 19.30----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 138 5 18 10 24 2 197

21.26 20.83 11.92 15.62 9.45 3.51----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 11 0 4 1 9 2 27

1.69 0.00 2.65 1.56 3.54 3.51----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 649 24 151 64 254 57 1199

54.13 2.00 12.59 5.34 21.18 4.75================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================gender

Q Male Female Total------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 48 36 84

8.56 5.64------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 140 143 283

24.96 22.41------------------------------------------------------About the same 112 196 308

19.96 30.72------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 156 145 301

27.81 22.73------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 93 103 196

16.58 16.14------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

153

Page 155: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 12 15 272.14 2.35

------------------------------------------------------Total 561 638 1199

46.79 53.21======================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total----------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 37 33 14 84

10.36 5.58 5.65----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 109 146 28 283

30.53 24.70 11.29----------------------------------------------------------------About the same 84 153 71 308

23.53 25.89 28.63----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 80 146 74 300

22.41 24.70 29.84----------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 36 102 59 197

10.08 17.26 23.79----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 11 11 2 24

3.08 1.86 0.81----------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 591 248 1196

29.85 49.41 20.74

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

154

Page 156: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 16 29 6 15 18 84

6.43 7.88 4.96 14.02 5.13-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 65 104 21 39 53 282

26.10 28.26 17.36 36.45 15.10-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 69 87 36 22 93 307

27.71 23.64 29.75 20.56 26.50-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 41 97 38 19 106 301

16.47 26.36 31.40 17.76 30.20-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 53 47 17 10 68 195

21.29 12.77 14.05 9.35 19.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 5 4 3 2 13 27

2.01 1.09 2.48 1.87 3.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 249 368 121 107 351 1196

20.82 30.77 10.12 8.95 29.35===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

155

Page 157: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=====================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total---------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 17 22 38 6 83

8.63 7.03 8.23 2.65---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 46 74 111 51 282

23.35 23.64 24.03 22.57---------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 64 92 114 37 307

32.49 29.39 24.68 16.37---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 50 72 106 73 301

25.38 23.00 22.94 32.30---------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 11 41 86 59 197

5.58 13.10 18.61 26.11---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 9 12 7 0 28

4.57 3.83 1.52 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 197 313 462 226 1198

16.44 26.13 38.56 18.86=====================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

156

Page 158: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q11. Right Direction/Wrong Track, Texas

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 10 26 21 131 73 173 152 586

16.13 25.24 21.65 36.49 58.87 74.57 70.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 39 57 58 133 30 41 41 399

62.90 55.34 59.79 37.05 24.19 17.67 19.07-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

157

Page 159: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 13 20 18 95 21 18 22 20720.97 19.42 18.56 26.46 16.94 7.76 10.23

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 97 359 124 232 215 1192

5.20 8.64 8.14 30.12 10.40 19.46 18.04=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 58 131 398 587

22.05 36.49 69.70---------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 154 133 112 399

58.56 37.05 19.61---------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 51 95 61 207

19.39 26.46 10.68---------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 359 571 1193

22.05 30.09 47.86===============================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

158

Page 160: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 73 44 22 51 86 72 230 578

28.63 38.60 18.49 45.95 71.07 57.60 77.44------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 131 47 72 31 17 34 52 384

51.37 41.23 60.50 27.93 14.05 27.20 17.51------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 51 23 25 29 18 19 15 180

20.00 20.18 21.01 26.13 14.88 15.20 5.05------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 114 119 111 121 125 297 1142

22.33 9.98 10.42 9.72 10.60 10.95 26.01==========================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 139 51 387 577

28.43 45.95 71.53-----------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 250 31 103 384

51.12 27.93 19.04-----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 100 29 51 180

20.45 26.13 9.43-----------------------------------------------------------------Total 489 111 541 1141

42.86 9.73 47.41=================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

159

Page 161: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 147 126 217 99 589

61.00 27.69 81.89 41.95---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 70 239 33 58 400

29.05 52.53 12.45 24.58---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 90 15 79 208

9.96 19.78 5.66 33.47---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 455 265 236 1197

20.13 38.01 22.14 19.72=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 16 188 141 49 128 66 588

39.02 53.41 42.60 43.36 52.24 57.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 15 93 123 40 90 39 400

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

160

Page 162: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

36.59 26.42 37.16 35.40 36.73 34.21----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 10 71 67 24 27 9 208

24.39 20.17 20.24 21.24 11.02 7.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 331 113 245 114 1196

3.43 29.43 27.68 9.45 20.48 9.53====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 107 146 66 132 133 584

56.91 55.30 50.38 47.14 40.43-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 48 70 38 110 133 399

25.53 26.52 29.01 39.29 40.43-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 33 48 27 38 63 209

17.55 18.18 20.61 13.57 19.15-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 264 131 280 329 1192

15.77 22.15 10.99 23.49 27.60===================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

161

Page 163: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

====================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 365 52 133 17 3 7 10 587

51.05 33.33 49.08 77.27 75.00 53.85 71.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 246 60 82 4 0 4 4 400

34.41 38.46 30.26 18.18 0.00 30.77 28.57------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 104 44 56 1 1 2 0 208

14.55 28.21 20.66 4.55 25.00 15.38 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 715 156 271 22 4 13 14 1195

59.83 13.05 22.68 1.84 0.33 1.09 1.17====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 361 12 47 35 108 24 587

55.80 52.17 31.33 53.85 42.52 42.11---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 190 6 75 20 91 19 401

29.37 26.09 50.00 30.77 35.83 33.33---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 96 5 28 10 55 14 208

14.84 21.74 18.67 15.38 21.65 24.56---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 647 23 150 65 254 57 1196

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

162

Page 164: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

54.10 1.92 12.54 5.43 21.24 4.77===================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------Right direction 303 284 587

54.01 44.79-----------------------------------------Wrong track 179 221 400

31.91 34.86-----------------------------------------Don't know 79 129 208

14.08 20.35-----------------------------------------Total 561 634 1195

46.95 53.05=========================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------Right direction 159 305 123 587

44.92 51.69 49.60

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

163

Page 165: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------Wrong track 133 196 71 400

37.57 33.22 28.63---------------------------------------------------Don't know 62 89 54 205

17.51 15.08 21.77---------------------------------------------------Total 354 590 248 1192

29.70 49.50 20.81===================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 124 171 71 39 182 587

50.00 46.47 57.72 36.45 51.85----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 87 136 34 50 94 401

35.08 36.96 27.64 46.73 26.78----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 37 61 18 18 75 209

14.92 16.58 14.63 16.82 21.37----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 248 368 123 107 351 1197

20.72 30.74 10.28 8.94 29.32======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

164

Page 166: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

========================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------Right direction 82 140 241 125 588

41.62 44.59 52.39 55.31--------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 56 118 159 68 401

28.43 37.58 34.57 30.09--------------------------------------------------------Don't know 59 56 60 33 208

29.95 17.83 13.04 14.60--------------------------------------------------------Total 197 314 460 226 1197

16.46 26.23 38.43 18.88========================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

165

Page 167: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q12. Personal Economy: Better o↵/Worse o↵

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 6 5 6 23 7 10 15 72

9.52 4.85 6.19 6.37 5.69 4.31 6.88------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 23 31 27 73 22 50 26 252

36.51 30.10 27.84 20.22 17.89 21.55 11.93------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

166

Page 168: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

About the same 16 50 45 152 52 97 97 50925.40 48.54 46.39 42.11 42.28 41.81 44.50

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 7 14 16 72 35 57 53 254

11.11 13.59 16.49 19.94 28.46 24.57 24.31------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 6 3 3 26 4 18 27 87

9.52 2.91 3.09 7.20 3.25 7.76 12.39------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 5 0 0 15 3 0 0 23

7.94 0.00 0.00 4.16 2.44 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 97 361 123 232 218 1197

5.26 8.60 8.10 30.16 10.28 19.38 18.21==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 16 23 32 71

6.11 6.37 5.58----------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 81 73 97 251

30.92 20.22 16.93----------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 110 152 245 507

41.98 42.11 42.76----------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 38 72 145 255

14.50 19.94 25.31

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

167

Page 169: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 12 26 50 88

4.58 7.20 8.73----------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 5 15 4 24

1.91 4.16 0.70----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 361 573 1196

21.91 30.18 47.91============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 34 7 10 4 7 3 4 69

13.28 6.19 8.40 3.57 5.79 2.42 1.34-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 68 25 38 16 21 22 56 246

26.56 22.12 31.93 14.29 17.36 17.74 18.79-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 95 52 53 50 49 64 126 489

37.11 46.02 44.54 44.64 40.50 51.61 42.28-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 38 21 15 32 34 27 73 240

14.84 18.58 12.61 28.57 28.10 21.77 24.50-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 14 7 3 9 10 7 38 88

5.47 6.19 2.52 8.04 8.26 5.65 12.75-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 1 0 1 0 1 1 11

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

168

Page 170: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

2.73 0.88 0.00 0.89 0.00 0.81 0.34-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 113 119 112 121 124 298 1143

22.40 9.89 10.41 9.80 10.59 10.85 26.07=======================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 51 4 14 69

10.45 3.57 2.57------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 131 16 100 247

26.84 14.29 18.38------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 200 50 239 489

40.98 44.64 43.93------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 74 32 134 240

15.16 28.57 24.63------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 24 9 55 88

4.92 8.04 10.11------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 1 2 11

1.64 0.89 0.37------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 112 544 1144

42.66 9.79 47.55==============================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

169

Page 171: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 12 49 7 4 72

4.98 10.79 2.64 1.67----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 40 138 46 27 251

16.60 30.40 17.36 11.30----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 112 177 109 109 507

46.47 38.99 41.13 45.61----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 46 71 79 60 256

19.09 15.64 29.81 25.10----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 31 15 24 19 89

12.86 3.30 9.06 7.95----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 4 0 20 24

0.00 0.88 0.00 8.37----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 454 265 239 1199

20.10 37.86 22.10 19.93======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

170

Page 172: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 0 19 18 9 22 4 72

0.00 5.38 5.42 7.89 8.94 3.48-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 6 56 64 25 66 34 251

15.38 15.86 19.28 21.93 26.83 29.57-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 9 156 146 46 97 52 506

23.08 44.19 43.98 40.35 39.43 45.22-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 19 78 74 19 49 17 256

48.72 22.10 22.29 16.67 19.92 14.78-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 1 40 18 12 11 8 90

2.56 11.33 5.42 10.53 4.47 6.96-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 4 12 3 1 0 24

10.26 1.13 3.61 2.63 0.41 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 39 353 332 114 246 115 1199

3.25 29.44 27.69 9.51 20.52 9.59=================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

171

Page 173: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

A lot better off 17 17 6 14 17 719.09 6.39 4.55 4.95 5.17

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 38 54 23 63 74 252

20.32 20.30 17.42 22.26 22.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 61 121 74 106 145 507

32.62 45.49 56.06 37.46 44.07--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 35 55 22 75 66 253

18.72 20.68 16.67 26.50 20.06--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 29 14 6 24 18 91

15.51 5.26 4.55 8.48 5.47--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 5 1 1 9 23

3.74 1.88 0.76 0.35 2.74--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 266 132 283 329 1197

15.62 22.22 11.03 23.64 27.49================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 24 27 19 1 0 0 0 71

3.33 17.31 6.99 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 159 28 52 5 1 4 2 251

22.08 17.95 19.12 22.73 33.33 28.57 14.29

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

172

Page 174: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 305 60 119 15 0 6 3 508

42.36 38.46 43.75 68.18 0.00 42.86 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 167 29 47 1 1 4 7 256

23.19 18.59 17.28 4.55 33.33 28.57 50.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 52 8 28 0 1 0 2 91

7.22 5.13 10.29 0.00 33.33 0.00 14.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 4 7 0 0 0 0 24

1.81 2.56 2.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 720 156 272 22 3 14 14 1201

59.95 12.99 22.65 1.83 0.25 1.17 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 34 3 2 2 30 0 71

5.24 13.04 1.32 3.12 11.81 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 129 3 32 5 70 12 251

19.88 13.04 21.05 7.81 27.56 21.05----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 285 5 66 30 87 33 506

43.91 21.74 43.42 46.88 34.25 57.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 142 6 40 19 40 10 257

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

173

Page 175: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

21.88 26.09 26.32 29.69 15.75 17.54----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 53 3 12 7 14 1 90

8.17 13.04 7.89 10.94 5.51 1.75----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 6 3 0 1 13 1 24

0.92 13.04 0.00 1.56 5.12 1.75----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 649 23 152 64 254 57 1199

54.13 1.92 12.68 5.34 21.18 4.75================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================gender

Q Male Female Total------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 39 32 71

6.94 5.02------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 128 123 251

22.78 19.28------------------------------------------------------About the same 245 263 508

43.59 41.22------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 101 155 256

17.97 24.29------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 40 50 90

7.12 7.84------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

174

Page 176: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 9 15 241.60 2.35

------------------------------------------------------Total 562 638 1200

46.83 53.17======================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total----------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 30 31 10 71

8.40 5.25 4.02----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 93 123 35 251

26.05 20.85 14.06----------------------------------------------------------------About the same 142 259 106 507

39.78 43.90 42.57----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 61 130 65 256

17.09 22.03 26.10----------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 28 36 26 90

7.84 6.10 10.44----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 11 7 21

0.84 1.86 2.81----------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 590 249 1196

29.85 49.33 20.82

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

175

Page 177: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 13 31 2 14 12 72

5.18 8.42 1.64 12.96 3.42-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 55 79 27 22 68 251

21.91 21.47 22.13 20.37 19.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 105 144 47 49 163 508

41.83 39.13 38.52 45.37 46.44-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 49 87 29 14 77 256

19.52 23.64 23.77 12.96 21.94-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 23 21 14 8 24 90

9.16 5.71 11.48 7.41 6.84-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 6 6 3 1 7 23

2.39 1.63 2.46 0.93 1.99-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 368 122 108 351 1200

20.92 30.67 10.17 9.00 29.25===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

176

Page 178: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=====================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total---------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 15 35 19 2 71

7.65 11.15 4.11 0.88---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 55 66 105 26 252

28.06 21.02 22.73 11.45---------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 71 134 192 110 507

36.22 42.68 41.56 48.46---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 29 48 111 67 255

14.80 15.29 24.03 29.52---------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 9 25 34 22 90

4.59 7.96 7.36 9.69---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 17 6 1 0 24

8.67 1.91 0.22 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 196 314 462 227 1199

16.35 26.19 38.53 18.93=====================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

177

Page 179: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Elections

Q13. 2014 Senate Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 3 1 6 49 64 164 141 428

4.76 0.97 6.25 13.61 52.03 70.69 64.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 38 71 53 112 8 8 9 299

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

178

Page 180: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

60.32 68.93 55.21 31.11 6.50 3.45 4.15--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 2 4 0 19 14 12 11 62

3.17 3.88 0.00 5.28 11.38 5.17 5.07--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 3 3 7 8 2 1 6 30

4.76 2.91 7.29 2.22 1.63 0.43 2.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 2 0 4 10 8 22 18 64

3.17 0.00 4.17 2.78 6.50 9.48 8.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 15 24 26 162 27 25 32 311

23.81 23.30 27.08 45.00 21.95 10.78 14.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 96 360 123 232 217 1194

5.28 8.63 8.04 30.15 10.30 19.43 18.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 10 49 368 427

3.80 13.61 64.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 162 112 26 300

61.60 31.11 4.54--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 6 19 38 63

2.28 5.28 6.63--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

179

Page 181: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Emily Sanchez 13 8 9 304.94 2.22 1.57

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 7 10 48 65

2.66 2.78 8.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 65 162 84 311

24.71 45.00 14.66--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 360 573 1196

21.99 30.10 47.91==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 7 6 4 15 70 64 248 414

2.75 5.22 3.36 13.51 58.33 51.61 83.22-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 172 46 67 5 2 2 1 295

67.45 40.00 56.30 4.50 1.67 1.61 0.34-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 2 5 5 15 19 14 2 62

0.78 4.35 4.20 13.51 15.83 11.29 0.67-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 3 8 10 4 2 0 3 30

1.18 6.96 8.40 3.60 1.67 0.00 1.01-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 5 1 2 12 13 13 16 62

1.96 0.87 1.68 10.81 10.83 10.48 5.37

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

180

Page 182: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 66 49 31 60 14 31 28 279

25.88 42.61 26.05 54.05 11.67 25.00 9.40-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 115 119 111 120 124 298 1142

22.33 10.07 10.42 9.72 10.51 10.86 26.09=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 17 15 382 414

3.48 13.51 70.48----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 285 5 5 295

58.40 4.50 0.92----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 12 15 35 62

2.46 13.51 6.46----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 21 4 4 29

4.30 3.60 0.74----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 7 12 43 62

1.43 10.81 7.93----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 146 60 73 279

29.92 54.05 13.47----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 111 542 1141

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

181

Page 183: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

42.77 9.73 47.50====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 161 12 173 83 429

67.08 2.64 65.28 34.73--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 3 289 0 8 300

1.25 63.52 0.00 3.35--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 7 13 34 9 63

2.92 2.86 12.83 3.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 4 21 3 3 31

1.67 4.62 1.13 1.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 12 10 33 10 65

5.00 2.20 12.45 4.18--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 53 110 22 126 311

22.08 24.18 8.30 52.72--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 455 265 239 1199

20.02 37.95 22.10 19.93============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

182

Page 184: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 11 125 118 45 81 49 429

26.83 35.41 35.65 39.82 32.79 42.98---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 2 71 79 28 78 42 300

4.88 20.11 23.87 24.78 31.58 36.84---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 6 10 19 1 20 8 64

14.63 2.83 5.74 0.88 8.10 7.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 2 9 6 5 9 1 32

4.88 2.55 1.81 4.42 3.64 0.88---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 2 21 18 7 13 3 64

4.88 5.95 5.44 6.19 5.26 2.63---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 18 117 91 27 46 11 310

43.90 33.14 27.49 23.89 18.62 9.65---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 353 331 113 247 114 1199

3.42 29.44 27.61 9.42 20.60 9.51=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

183

Page 185: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 91 127 44 85 80 427

48.66 47.92 33.59 30.04 24.32--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 31 35 32 86 116 300

16.58 13.21 24.43 30.39 35.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 5 13 10 15 18 61

2.67 4.91 7.63 5.30 5.47--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 3 1 7 8 12 31

1.60 0.38 5.34 2.83 3.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 20 18 4 10 12 64

10.70 6.79 3.05 3.53 3.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 37 71 34 79 91 312

19.79 26.79 25.95 27.92 27.66--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 265 131 283 329 1195

15.65 22.18 10.96 23.68 27.53============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 346 7 56 4 3 7 5 428

48.19 4.55 20.59 18.18 75.00 53.85 33.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

184

Page 186: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

David Alameel 151 67 68 9 0 1 3 29921.03 43.51 25.00 40.91 0.00 7.69 20.00

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 44 4 13 1 0 0 2 64

6.13 2.60 4.78 4.55 0.00 0.00 13.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 10 2 14 1 0 3 0 30

1.39 1.30 5.15 4.55 0.00 23.08 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 39 5 13 2 1 0 5 65

5.43 3.25 4.78 9.09 25.00 0.00 33.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 128 69 108 5 0 2 0 312

17.83 44.81 39.71 22.73 0.00 15.38 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 154 272 22 4 13 15 1198

59.93 12.85 22.70 1.84 0.33 1.09 1.25============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 281 4 38 36 56 14 429

43.36 16.67 25.17 55.38 22.05 24.56--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 137 1 57 10 75 19 299

21.14 4.17 37.75 15.38 29.53 33.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 44 0 5 2 11 1 63

6.79 0.00 3.31 3.08 4.33 1.75

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

185

Page 187: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 15 0 1 0 13 2 31

2.31 0.00 0.66 0.00 5.12 3.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 36 1 6 5 17 0 65

5.56 4.17 3.97 7.69 6.69 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 135 18 44 12 82 21 312

20.83 75.00 29.14 18.46 32.28 36.84--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 24 151 65 254 57 1199

54.05 2.00 12.59 5.42 21.18 4.75======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 216 213 429

38.50 33.33----------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 149 151 300

26.56 23.63----------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 39 25 64

6.95 3.91----------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 17 13 30

3.03 2.03----------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 27 38 65

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

186

Page 188: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

4.81 5.95----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 113 199 312

20.14 31.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 561 639 1200

46.75 53.25============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 95 208 124 427

26.54 35.31 50.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 125 149 26 300

34.92 25.30 10.48--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 12 36 15 63

3.35 6.11 6.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 18 13 0 31

5.03 2.21 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 10 42 13 65

2.79 7.13 5.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 98 141 70 309

27.37 23.94 28.23--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

187

Page 189: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Total 358 589 248 119529.96 49.29 20.75

======================================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 86 131 45 20 147 429

34.26 35.60 37.19 18.52 41.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 66 98 22 43 71 300

26.29 26.63 18.18 39.81 20.17--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 14 16 5 5 24 64

5.58 4.35 4.13 4.63 6.82--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 10 9 4 4 3 30

3.98 2.45 3.31 3.70 0.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 15 17 6 7 20 65

5.98 4.62 4.96 6.48 5.68--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 60 97 39 29 87 312

23.90 26.36 32.23 26.85 24.72--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 368 121 108 352 1200

20.92 30.67 10.08 9.00 29.33============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

188

Page 190: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 30 95 182 122 429

15.15 30.35 39.48 53.51-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 38 86 124 52 300

19.19 27.48 26.90 22.81-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 14 21 27 2 64

7.07 6.71 5.86 0.88-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 14 7 6 4 31

7.07 2.24 1.30 1.75-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 13 12 26 13 64

6.57 3.83 5.64 5.70-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 89 92 96 35 312

44.95 29.39 20.82 15.35-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 313 461 228 1200

16.50 26.08 38.42 19.00===========================================================================================

Q14. 2014 Governor Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

189

Page 191: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 47 83 73 141 20 10 8 382

75.81 80.58 76.04 39.61 16.13 4.33 3.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 2 5 5 64 71 195 179 521

3.23 4.85 5.21 17.98 57.26 84.42 82.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 1 1 1 8 9 9 6 35

1.61 0.97 1.04 2.25 7.26 3.90 2.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 1 0 3 5 0 1 4 14

1.61 0.00 3.12 1.40 0.00 0.43 1.84--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

190

Page 192: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Someone else 1 1 2 14 6 2 5 311.61 0.97 2.08 3.93 4.84 0.87 2.30

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 10 13 12 124 18 14 15 206

16.13 12.62 12.50 34.83 14.52 6.06 6.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 96 356 124 231 217 1189

5.21 8.66 8.07 29.94 10.43 19.43 18.25============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 204 141 38 383

77.86 39.61 6.64--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 12 64 445 521

4.58 17.98 77.80--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 2 8 25 35

0.76 2.25 4.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 5 5 5 15

1.91 1.40 0.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 4 14 12 30

1.53 3.93 2.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 35 124 47 206

13.36 34.83 8.22

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

191

Page 193: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 356 572 1190

22.02 29.92 48.07==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 189 69 87 12 4 8 5 374

74.41 60.53 73.73 10.62 3.28 6.45 1.68-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 11 15 5 28 101 86 268 514

4.33 13.16 4.24 24.78 82.79 69.35 89.93-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 4 4 2 12 7 4 3 36

1.57 3.51 1.69 10.62 5.74 3.23 1.01-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 5 1 1 4 2 0 2 15

1.97 0.88 0.85 3.54 1.64 0.00 0.67-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 5 1 9 5 2 2 6 30

1.97 0.88 7.63 4.42 1.64 1.61 2.01-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 40 24 14 52 6 24 14 174

15.75 21.05 11.86 46.02 4.92 19.35 4.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 114 118 113 122 124 298 1143

22.22 9.97 10.32 9.89 10.67 10.85 26.07=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

192

Page 194: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 345 12 16 373

71.13 10.62 2.96----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 30 28 454 512

6.19 24.78 83.92----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 10 12 13 35

2.06 10.62 2.40----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 7 4 4 15

1.44 3.54 0.74----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 14 5 10 29

2.89 4.42 1.85----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 79 52 44 175

16.29 46.02 8.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 485 113 541 1139

42.58 9.92 47.50====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

193

Page 195: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 18 345 2 18 383

7.44 76.50 0.75 7.63--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 171 24 237 92 524

70.66 5.32 89.10 38.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 8 8 10 10 36

3.31 1.77 3.76 4.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 1 9 3 2 15

0.41 2.00 1.13 0.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 8 14 4 6 32

3.31 3.10 1.50 2.54--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 36 51 10 108 205

14.88 11.31 3.76 45.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 242 451 266 236 1195

20.25 37.74 22.26 19.75============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 6 98 89 45 94 51 383

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

194

Page 196: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

15.00 27.92 26.81 39.82 38.37 44.74---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 18 145 154 43 115 49 524

45.00 41.31 46.39 38.05 46.94 42.98---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 2 8 9 4 4 7 34

5.00 2.28 2.71 3.54 1.63 6.14---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 0 6 7 1 1 1 16

0.00 1.71 2.11 0.88 0.41 0.88---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 2 17 2 6 4 0 31

5.00 4.84 0.60 5.31 1.63 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 12 77 71 14 27 6 207

30.00 21.94 21.39 12.39 11.02 5.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 351 332 113 245 114 1195

3.35 29.37 27.78 9.46 20.50 9.54=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 42 47 37 110 148 384

22.22 17.74 28.68 39.01 45.12--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 105 155 58 106 95 519

55.56 58.49 44.96 37.59 28.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

195

Page 197: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Kathy Glass 7 6 6 9 9 373.70 2.26 4.65 3.19 2.74

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 1 4 3 0 7 15

0.53 1.51 2.33 0.00 2.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 5 8 3 15 1 32

2.65 3.02 2.33 5.32 0.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 29 45 22 42 68 206

15.34 16.98 17.05 14.89 20.73--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 189 265 129 282 328 1193

15.84 22.21 10.81 23.64 27.49============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 185 83 95 11 0 6 3 383

25.87 54.25 35.06 50.00 0.00 46.15 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 410 8 80 5 4 6 10 523

57.34 5.23 29.52 22.73 100.00 46.15 71.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 20 7 6 1 0 0 1 35

2.80 4.58 2.21 4.55 0.00 0.00 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 7 4 2 1 0 0 0 14

0.98 2.61 0.74 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

196

Page 198: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 13 2 14 2 0 0 0 31

1.82 1.31 5.17 9.09 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 80 49 74 2 0 1 0 206

11.19 32.03 27.31 9.09 0.00 7.69 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 715 153 271 22 4 13 14 1192

59.98 12.84 22.73 1.85 0.34 1.09 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 178 7 68 14 90 25 382

27.51 30.43 45.95 21.88 35.57 44.64--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 340 7 52 43 71 11 524

52.55 30.43 35.14 67.19 28.06 19.64--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 20 0 2 0 12 2 36

3.09 0.00 1.35 0.00 4.74 3.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 6 0 1 0 4 3 14

0.93 0.00 0.68 0.00 1.58 5.36--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 16 0 0 1 13 0 30

2.47 0.00 0.00 1.56 5.14 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 87 9 25 6 63 15 205

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

197

Page 199: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

13.45 39.13 16.89 9.38 24.90 26.79--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 647 23 148 64 253 56 1191

54.32 1.93 12.43 5.37 21.24 4.70======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 181 202 383

32.26 31.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 259 265 524

46.17 41.80----------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 22 13 35

3.92 2.05----------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 8 7 15

1.43 1.10----------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 17 15 32

3.03 2.37----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 74 132 206

13.19 20.82----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 561 634 1195

46.95 53.05============================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

198

Page 200: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 153 190 40 383

42.86 32.15 16.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 109 272 142 523

30.53 46.02 58.20--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 9 20 7 36

2.52 3.38 2.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 6 8 1 15

1.68 1.35 0.41--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 11 6 14 31

3.08 1.02 5.74--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 69 95 40 204

19.33 16.07 16.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 591 244 1192

29.95 49.58 20.47======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

199

Page 201: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 82 128 33 62 78 383

32.67 34.97 27.27 57.94 22.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 112 149 59 29 176 525

44.62 40.71 48.76 27.10 50.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 5 10 3 7 11 36

1.99 2.73 2.48 6.54 3.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 2 8 0 0 5 15

0.80 2.19 0.00 0.00 1.42--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 7 5 4 0 15 31

2.79 1.37 3.31 0.00 4.27--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 43 66 22 9 66 206

17.13 18.03 18.18 8.41 18.80--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 366 121 107 351 1196

20.99 30.60 10.12 8.95 29.35============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

200

Page 202: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Wendy Davis 49 116 156 62 38324.62 36.94 34.06 27.56

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 57 113 222 133 525

28.64 35.99 48.47 59.11-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 11 12 11 2 36

5.53 3.82 2.40 0.89-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 7 4 3 1 15

3.52 1.27 0.66 0.44-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 7 7 14 4 32

3.52 2.23 3.06 1.78-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 68 62 52 23 205

34.17 19.75 11.35 10.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 199 314 458 225 1196

16.64 26.25 38.29 18.81===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

201

Page 203: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q15. 2014 Lieutenant Governor Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 45 69 60 112 15 8 5 314

71.43 66.99 61.86 31.20 12.00 3.45 2.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 1 1 6 57 63 191 170 489

1.59 0.97 6.19 15.88 50.40 82.33 78.70--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

202

Page 204: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Robert Butler 0 2 3 8 15 5 13 460.00 1.94 3.09 2.23 12.00 2.16 6.02

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 1 4 4 6 2 0 1 18

1.59 3.88 4.12 1.67 1.60 0.00 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 3 1 3 21 6 13 6 53

4.76 0.97 3.09 5.85 4.80 5.60 2.78--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 13 26 21 155 24 15 21 275

20.63 25.24 21.65 43.18 19.20 6.47 9.72--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 97 359 125 232 216 1195

5.27 8.62 8.12 30.04 10.46 19.41 18.08============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 174 112 28 314

66.41 31.20 4.90--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 8 57 424 489

3.05 15.88 74.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 5 8 33 46

1.91 2.23 5.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 9 6 2 17

3.44 1.67 0.35

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

203

Page 205: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 6 21 25 52

2.29 5.85 4.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 60 155 60 275

22.90 43.18 10.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 359 572 1193

21.96 30.09 47.95==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 169 44 77 3 4 7 6 310

66.27 38.94 65.25 2.65 3.33 5.65 2.01-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 11 9 7 30 93 79 250 479

4.31 7.96 5.93 26.55 77.50 63.71 83.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 6 7 4 4 12 3 10 46

2.35 6.19 3.39 3.54 10.00 2.42 3.36-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 4 5 4 3 0 1 0 17

1.57 4.42 3.39 2.65 0.00 0.81 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 6 7 2 13 1 6 14 49

2.35 6.19 1.69 11.50 0.83 4.84 4.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 59 41 24 60 10 28 18 240

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

204

Page 206: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

23.14 36.28 20.34 53.10 8.33 22.58 6.04-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 113 118 113 120 124 298 1141

22.35 9.90 10.34 9.90 10.52 10.87 26.12=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 290 3 17 310

59.92 2.65 3.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 27 30 422 479

5.58 26.55 77.72----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 16 4 25 45

3.31 3.54 4.60----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 13 3 1 17

2.69 2.65 0.18----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 14 13 22 49

2.89 11.50 4.05----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 124 60 56 240

25.62 53.10 10.31----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 484 113 543 1140

42.46 9.91 47.63====================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

205

Page 207: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 14 288 2 10 314

5.86 63.72 0.75 4.20--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 142 26 237 87 492

59.41 5.75 88.76 36.55--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 16 16 9 5 46

6.69 3.54 3.37 2.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 1 13 2 1 17

0.42 2.88 0.75 0.42--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 23 17 3 8 51

9.62 3.76 1.12 3.36--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 43 92 14 127 276

17.99 20.35 5.24 53.36--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 239 452 267 238 1196

19.98 37.79 22.32 19.90============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

206

Page 208: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 5 74 70 36 88 41 314

12.50 21.02 21.21 31.86 35.77 35.96---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 17 132 137 42 111 51 490

42.50 37.50 41.52 37.17 45.12 44.74---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 1 10 16 7 6 6 46

2.50 2.84 4.85 6.19 2.44 5.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 2 5 8 1 2 0 18

5.00 1.42 2.42 0.88 0.81 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 0 21 14 5 6 5 51

0.00 5.97 4.24 4.42 2.44 4.39---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 15 110 85 22 33 11 276

37.50 31.25 25.76 19.47 13.41 9.65---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 352 330 113 246 114 1195

3.35 29.46 27.62 9.46 20.59 9.54=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

207

Page 209: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Leticia Van de Putte 28 35 31 98 122 31414.81 13.16 23.48 35.00 37.20

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 96 148 62 98 83 487

50.79 55.64 46.97 35.00 25.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 9 8 9 8 12 46

4.76 3.01 6.82 2.86 3.66--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 5 1 3 1 8 18

2.65 0.38 2.27 0.36 2.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 18 13 4 10 8 53

9.52 4.89 3.03 3.57 2.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 33 61 23 65 95 277

17.46 22.93 17.42 23.21 28.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 189 266 132 280 328 1195

15.82 22.26 11.05 23.43 27.45============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 159 57 84 9 0 4 0 313

22.18 37.01 31.00 42.86 0.00 28.57 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 386 18 61 6 3 6 11 491

53.84 11.69 22.51 28.57 75.00 42.86 78.57

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

208

Page 210: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 32 4 8 1 0 1 0 46

4.46 2.60 2.95 4.76 0.00 7.14 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 6 4 5 1 0 0 0 16

0.84 2.60 1.85 4.76 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 24 12 15 0 1 0 0 52

3.35 7.79 5.54 0.00 25.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 110 59 98 4 0 3 3 277

15.34 38.31 36.16 19.05 0.00 21.43 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 717 154 271 21 4 14 14 1195

60.00 12.89 22.68 1.76 0.33 1.17 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 151 3 60 14 69 17 314

23.37 13.04 40.00 21.88 27.17 28.81--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 324 9 50 35 57 15 490

50.15 39.13 33.33 54.69 22.44 25.42--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 25 0 2 1 14 4 46

3.87 0.00 1.33 1.56 5.51 6.78--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 6 0 1 0 9 2 18

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

209

Page 211: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.93 0.00 0.67 0.00 3.54 3.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 26 0 4 3 16 3 52

4.02 0.00 2.67 4.69 6.30 5.08--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 114 11 33 11 89 18 276

17.65 47.83 22.00 17.19 35.04 30.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 646 23 150 64 254 59 1196

54.01 1.92 12.54 5.35 21.24 4.93======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 151 163 314

26.92 25.67----------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 254 237 491

45.28 37.32----------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 22 23 45

3.92 3.62----------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 9 8 17

1.60 1.26----------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 20 32 52

3.57 5.04----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

210

Page 212: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 105 172 27718.72 27.09

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 561 635 1196

46.91 53.09============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 138 143 33 314

38.66 24.28 13.47--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 100 257 133 490

28.01 43.63 54.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 14 20 11 45

3.92 3.40 4.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 3 14 0 17

0.84 2.38 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 19 19 14 52

5.32 3.23 5.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 83 136 54 273

23.25 23.09 22.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 589 245 1191

29.97 49.45 20.57

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

211

Page 213: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

======================================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 69 100 31 47 67 314

27.60 27.17 25.83 43.52 19.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 96 152 49 28 166 491

38.40 41.30 40.83 25.93 47.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 7 19 2 7 10 45

2.80 5.16 1.67 6.48 2.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 4 8 2 1 3 18

1.60 2.17 1.67 0.93 0.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 19 5 9 5 14 52

7.60 1.36 7.50 4.63 4.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 55 84 27 20 90 276

22.00 22.83 22.50 18.52 25.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 368 120 108 350 1196

20.90 30.77 10.03 9.03 29.26============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

212

Page 214: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 32 94 132 56 314

16.16 29.94 28.76 24.67-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 48 99 218 126 491

24.24 31.53 47.49 55.51-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 9 16 17 4 46

4.55 5.10 3.70 1.76-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 11 4 1 1 17

5.56 1.27 0.22 0.44-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 9 15 21 7 52

4.55 4.78 4.58 3.08-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 89 86 70 33 278

44.95 27.39 15.25 14.54-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 459 227 1198

16.53 26.21 38.31 18.95===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

213

Page 215: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q16. 2014 Attorney General Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 40 67 55 117 15 15 15 324

63.49 65.05 57.29 32.59 12.10 6.52 6.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 2 1 8 55 59 193 163 481

3.17 0.97 8.33 15.32 47.58 83.91 75.12--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

214

Page 216: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Jamie Balagia 0 5 4 7 9 1 4 300.00 4.85 4.17 1.95 7.26 0.43 1.84

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 6 3 2 11 5 0 7 34

9.52 2.91 2.08 3.06 4.03 0.00 3.23--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 15 27 27 169 36 21 28 323

23.81 26.21 28.12 47.08 29.03 9.13 12.90--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 96 359 124 230 217 1192

5.29 8.64 8.05 30.12 10.40 19.30 18.20============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 162 117 45 324

61.60 32.59 7.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 11 55 415 481

4.18 15.32 72.55--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 10 7 15 32

3.80 1.95 2.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 11 11 12 34

4.18 3.06 2.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 69 169 85 323

26.24 47.08 14.86

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

215

Page 217: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 359 572 1194

22.03 30.07 47.91==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 165 54 69 13 7 3 10 321

64.45 47.79 57.50 11.71 5.83 2.42 3.36-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 6 7 6 28 96 77 250 470

2.34 6.19 5.00 25.23 80.00 62.10 83.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 7 3 3 7 6 4 1 31

2.73 2.65 2.50 6.31 5.00 3.23 0.34-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 8 4 7 4 0 2 9 34

3.12 3.54 5.83 3.60 0.00 1.61 3.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 70 45 35 59 11 38 28 286

27.34 39.82 29.17 53.15 9.17 30.65 9.40-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 113 120 111 120 124 298 1142

22.42 9.89 10.51 9.72 10.51 10.86 26.09=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

216

Page 218: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 287 13 20 320

58.81 11.71 3.70----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 19 28 423 470

3.89 25.23 78.19----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 13 7 11 31

2.66 6.31 2.03----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 19 4 10 33

3.89 3.60 1.85----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 150 59 77 286

30.74 53.15 14.23----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 111 541 1140

42.81 9.74 47.46====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 20 289 7 10 326

8.26 63.80 2.64 4.18

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

217

Page 219: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 146 16 232 89 483

60.33 3.53 87.55 37.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 4 12 9 7 32

1.65 2.65 3.40 2.93--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 10 21 2 0 33

4.13 4.64 0.75 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 62 115 15 133 325

25.62 25.39 5.66 55.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 242 453 265 239 1199

20.18 37.78 22.10 19.93============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 5 84 71 40 84 41 325

12.20 23.86 21.32 35.40 34.15 36.61---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 14 137 129 43 110 50 483

34.15 38.92 38.74 38.05 44.72 44.64---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 2 4 13 2 6 4 31

4.88 1.14 3.90 1.77 2.44 3.57---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 0 11 13 1 5 3 33

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

218

Page 220: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 3.12 3.90 0.88 2.03 2.68---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 20 116 107 27 41 14 325

48.78 32.95 32.13 23.89 16.67 12.50---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 333 113 246 112 1197

3.43 29.41 27.82 9.44 20.55 9.36=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 39 44 34 83 124 324

20.97 16.60 25.56 29.54 37.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 98 143 56 97 84 478

52.69 53.96 42.11 34.52 25.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 1 2 8 7 13 31

0.54 0.75 6.02 2.49 3.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 8 2 5 12 7 34

4.30 0.75 3.76 4.27 2.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 40 74 30 82 99 325

21.51 27.92 22.56 29.18 30.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 186 265 133 281 327 1192

15.60 22.23 11.16 23.57 27.43============================================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

219

Page 221: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 163 68 73 12 0 4 4 324

22.73 44.16 26.84 52.17 0.00 30.77 28.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 377 5 76 5 4 6 10 483

52.58 3.25 27.94 21.74 100.00 46.15 71.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 22 3 6 1 0 0 0 32

3.07 1.95 2.21 4.35 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 14 9 10 0 0 0 0 33

1.95 5.84 3.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 141 69 107 5 0 3 0 325

19.67 44.81 39.34 21.74 0.00 23.08 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 717 154 272 23 4 13 14 1197

59.90 12.87 22.72 1.92 0.33 1.09 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

220

Page 222: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 152 2 51 13 91 17 326

23.53 8.33 33.77 20.00 35.69 29.82--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 324 5 48 36 59 11 483

50.15 20.83 31.79 55.38 23.14 19.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 23 0 2 0 6 1 32

3.56 0.00 1.32 0.00 2.35 1.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 13 1 2 0 12 5 33

2.01 4.17 1.32 0.00 4.71 8.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 134 16 48 16 87 23 324

20.74 66.67 31.79 24.62 34.12 40.35--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 646 24 151 65 255 57 1198

53.92 2.00 12.60 5.43 21.29 4.76======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 159 165 324

28.39 25.90----------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 258 225 483

46.07 35.32----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

221

Page 223: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Jamie Balagia 14 17 312.50 2.67

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 21 13 34

3.75 2.04----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 108 217 325

19.29 34.07----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 560 637 1197

46.78 53.22============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 123 157 45 325

34.45 26.61 18.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 101 251 130 482

28.29 42.54 52.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 11 17 4 32

3.08 2.88 1.63--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 17 10 6 33

4.76 1.69 2.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 105 155 61 321

29.41 26.27 24.80

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

222

Page 224: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 590 246 1193

29.92 49.46 20.62======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 69 102 28 41 84 324

27.60 27.87 22.95 38.32 24.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 100 139 56 24 163 482

40.00 37.98 45.90 22.43 46.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 4 14 3 4 7 32

1.60 3.83 2.46 3.74 2.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 6 19 1 6 1 33

2.40 5.19 0.82 5.61 0.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 71 92 34 32 95 324

28.40 25.14 27.87 29.91 27.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 366 122 107 350 1195

20.92 30.63 10.21 8.95 29.29============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

223

Page 225: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 52 90 126 57 325

26.26 28.75 27.45 25.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 44 102 205 131 482

22.22 32.59 44.66 57.96-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 6 8 17 0 31

3.03 2.56 3.70 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 5 16 13 0 34

2.53 5.11 2.83 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 91 97 98 38 324

45.96 30.99 21.35 16.81-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 313 459 226 1196

16.56 26.17 38.38 18.90===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

224

Page 226: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q17. 2014 Comptroller Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 42 60 57 109 10 8 10 296

70.00 58.82 58.16 30.36 8.00 3.48 4.59--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 0 0 6 38 43 153 140 380

0.00 0.00 6.12 10.58 34.40 66.52 64.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

225

Page 227: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Ben Sanders 2 3 1 13 10 13 16 583.33 2.94 1.02 3.62 8.00 5.65 7.34

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 4 2 4 8 1 0 2 21

6.67 1.96 4.08 2.23 0.80 0.00 0.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 12 37 30 191 61 56 50 437

20.00 36.27 30.61 53.20 48.80 24.35 22.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 60 102 98 359 125 230 218 1192

5.03 8.56 8.22 30.12 10.49 19.30 18.29============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 159 109 27 295

60.92 30.36 4.72--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 6 38 336 380

2.30 10.58 58.74--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 6 13 39 58

2.30 3.62 6.82--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 11 8 3 22

4.21 2.23 0.52--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 79 191 167 437

30.27 53.20 29.20

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

226

Page 228: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 359 572 1192

21.90 30.12 47.99==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 169 43 59 4 4 4 8 291

66.27 37.72 50.43 3.57 3.28 3.23 2.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 4 3 4 19 63 59 223 375

1.57 2.63 3.42 16.96 51.64 47.58 75.34-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 7 9 7 10 10 8 4 55

2.75 7.89 5.98 8.93 8.20 6.45 1.35-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 4 2 5 5 2 3 0 21

1.57 1.75 4.27 4.46 1.64 2.42 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 71 57 42 74 43 50 61 398

27.84 50.00 35.90 66.07 35.25 40.32 20.61-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 114 117 112 122 124 296 1140

22.37 10.00 10.26 9.82 10.70 10.88 25.96=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

227

Page 229: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 271 4 16 291

55.76 3.57 2.95----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 11 19 345 375

2.26 16.96 63.65----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 23 10 23 56

4.73 8.93 4.24----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 11 5 5 21

2.26 4.46 0.92----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 170 74 153 397

34.98 66.07 28.23----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 112 542 1140

42.63 9.82 47.54====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 10 275 5 6 296

4.13 60.84 1.89 2.53

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

228

Page 230: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 144 8 175 55 382

59.50 1.77 66.29 23.21--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 6 20 22 10 58

2.48 4.42 8.33 4.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 4 14 3 1 22

1.65 3.10 1.14 0.42--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 78 135 59 165 437

32.23 29.87 22.35 69.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 242 452 264 237 1195

20.25 37.82 22.09 19.83============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 3 73 74 35 73 38 296

7.32 20.68 22.42 30.97 29.80 33.33---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 8 114 103 31 83 44 383

19.51 32.29 31.21 27.43 33.88 38.60---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 4 8 15 7 16 7 57

9.76 2.27 4.55 6.19 6.53 6.14---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 0 5 6 3 4 4 22

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

229

Page 231: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 1.42 1.82 2.65 1.63 3.51---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 26 153 132 37 69 21 438

63.41 43.34 40.00 32.74 28.16 18.42---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 353 330 113 245 114 1196

3.43 29.52 27.59 9.45 20.48 9.53=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 29 43 34 82 107 295

15.51 16.35 25.95 29.29 32.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 85 131 34 70 62 382

45.45 49.81 25.95 25.00 18.90--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 9 9 12 12 15 57

4.81 3.42 9.16 4.29 4.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 4 6 2 3 7 22

2.14 2.28 1.53 1.07 2.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 60 74 49 113 137 433

32.09 28.14 37.40 40.36 41.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 263 131 280 328 1189

15.73 22.12 11.02 23.55 27.59============================================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

230

Page 232: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 141 68 71 10 0 4 1 295

19.72 44.16 26.10 45.45 0.00 30.77 7.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 318 2 50 3 2 1 6 382

44.48 1.30 18.38 13.64 50.00 7.69 46.15--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 33 11 8 2 0 2 1 57

4.62 7.14 2.94 9.09 0.00 15.38 7.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 13 5 3 0 0 0 0 21

1.82 3.25 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 210 68 140 7 2 6 5 438

29.37 44.16 51.47 31.82 50.00 46.15 38.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 715 154 272 22 4 13 13 1193

59.93 12.91 22.80 1.84 0.34 1.09 1.09============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

231

Page 233: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 142 2 57 9 73 12 295

21.98 8.70 37.75 13.85 28.85 21.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 253 9 35 33 46 8 384

39.16 39.13 23.18 50.77 18.18 14.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 40 0 2 2 11 3 58

6.19 0.00 1.32 3.08 4.35 5.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 8 0 3 0 8 3 22

1.24 0.00 1.99 0.00 3.16 5.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 203 12 54 21 115 31 436

31.42 52.17 35.76 32.31 45.45 54.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 646 23 151 65 253 57 1195

54.06 1.92 12.64 5.44 21.17 4.77======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 142 153 295

25.45 24.06----------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 194 189 383

34.77 29.72----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

232

Page 234: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Ben Sanders 34 24 586.09 3.77

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 11 10 21

1.97 1.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 177 260 437

31.72 40.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 558 636 1194

46.73 53.27============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 120 143 32 295

33.52 24.32 12.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 68 201 113 382

18.99 34.18 45.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 22 28 8 58

6.15 4.76 3.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 11 10 2 23

3.07 1.70 0.81--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 137 206 92 435

38.27 35.03 37.25

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

233

Page 235: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 358 588 247 1193

30.01 49.29 20.70======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 64 95 21 45 70 295

25.70 25.82 17.21 42.45 19.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 76 108 35 28 136 383

30.52 29.35 28.69 26.42 38.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 10 27 7 4 10 58

4.02 7.34 5.74 3.77 2.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 5 9 1 1 6 22

2.01 2.45 0.82 0.94 1.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 94 129 58 28 129 438

37.75 35.05 47.54 26.42 36.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 249 368 122 106 351 1196

20.82 30.77 10.20 8.86 29.35============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

234

Page 236: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 43 80 122 50 295

21.72 25.48 26.64 22.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 38 75 165 105 383

19.19 23.89 36.03 46.67-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 10 25 19 3 57

5.05 7.96 4.15 1.33-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 6 9 7 0 22

3.03 2.87 1.53 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 101 125 145 67 438

51.01 39.81 31.66 29.78-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 458 225 1195

16.57 26.28 38.33 18.83===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

235

Page 237: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q18. 2014 Land Commissioner Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 40 64 49 107 13 11 12 296

63.49 62.14 51.04 29.72 10.40 4.76 5.50--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 2 1 10 63 59 151 147 433

3.17 0.97 10.42 17.50 47.20 65.37 67.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

236

Page 238: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Justin Knight 3 1 7 15 15 18 17 764.76 0.97 7.29 4.17 12.00 7.79 7.80

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 5 7 6 11 1 1 5 36

7.94 6.80 6.25 3.06 0.80 0.43 2.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 13 30 24 164 37 50 37 355

20.63 29.13 25.00 45.56 29.60 21.65 16.97--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 96 360 125 231 218 1196

5.27 8.61 8.03 30.10 10.45 19.31 18.23============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 153 107 35 295

58.62 29.72 6.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 13 63 358 434

4.98 17.50 62.48--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 11 15 49 75

4.21 4.17 8.55--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 17 11 7 35

6.51 3.06 1.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 67 164 124 355

25.67 45.56 21.64

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

237

Page 239: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 360 573 1194

21.86 30.15 47.99==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 172 48 63 3 6 2 0 294

67.72 42.11 52.50 2.68 4.96 1.61 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 5 13 4 30 65 74 232 423

1.97 11.40 3.33 26.79 53.72 59.68 78.11-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 7 7 5 15 16 12 10 72

2.76 6.14 4.17 13.39 13.22 9.68 3.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 8 4 12 3 4 0 4 35

3.15 3.51 10.00 2.68 3.31 0.00 1.35-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 62 42 36 61 30 36 51 318

24.41 36.84 30.00 54.46 24.79 29.03 17.17-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 114 120 112 121 124 297 1142

22.24 9.98 10.51 9.81 10.60 10.86 26.01=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

238

Page 240: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 283 3 8 294

57.99 2.68 1.47----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 22 30 372 424

4.51 26.79 68.51----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 19 15 38 72

3.89 13.39 7.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 24 3 8 35

4.92 2.68 1.47----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 140 61 117 318

28.69 54.46 21.55----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 112 543 1143

42.69 9.80 47.51====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 8 278 1 8 295

3.32 61.37 0.38 3.38

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

239

Page 241: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 162 23 177 73 435

67.22 5.08 66.79 30.80--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 16 17 34 8 75

6.64 3.75 12.83 3.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 2 25 3 5 35

0.83 5.52 1.13 2.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 53 110 50 143 356

21.99 24.28 18.87 60.34--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 453 265 237 1196

20.15 37.88 22.16 19.82============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 6 75 67 39 70 38 295

15.00 21.25 20.18 34.21 28.46 33.63---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 15 128 132 34 88 39 436

37.50 36.26 39.76 29.82 35.77 34.51---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 2 16 21 3 20 12 74

5.00 4.53 6.33 2.63 8.13 10.62---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 0 5 7 8 9 6 35

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

240

Page 242: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 1.42 2.11 7.02 3.66 5.31---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 17 129 105 30 59 18 358

42.50 36.54 31.63 26.32 23.98 15.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 353 332 114 246 113 1198

3.34 29.47 27.71 9.52 20.53 9.43=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 39 38 32 79 108 296

20.86 14.29 24.43 28.11 32.93--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 85 128 51 87 84 435

45.45 48.12 38.93 30.96 25.61--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 12 18 15 13 12 70

6.42 6.77 11.45 4.63 3.66--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 6 6 2 7 14 35

3.21 2.26 1.53 2.49 4.27--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 45 76 31 95 110 357

24.06 28.57 23.66 33.81 33.54--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 266 131 281 328 1193

15.67 22.30 10.98 23.55 27.49============================================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

241

Page 243: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 137 70 78 9 0 0 1 295

19.08 45.16 28.57 39.13 0.00 0.00 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 342 10 67 6 4 4 3 436

47.63 6.45 24.54 26.09 100.00 33.33 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 43 6 19 2 0 0 5 75

5.99 3.87 6.96 8.70 0.00 0.00 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 24 4 4 1 0 2 0 35

3.34 2.58 1.47 4.35 0.00 16.67 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 172 65 105 5 0 6 5 358

23.96 41.94 38.46 21.74 0.00 50.00 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 155 273 23 4 12 14 1199

59.88 12.93 22.77 1.92 0.33 1.00 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

242

Page 244: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 129 4 53 15 76 19 296

19.97 17.39 34.87 23.08 29.80 32.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 290 5 48 38 45 10 436

44.89 21.74 31.58 58.46 17.65 17.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 49 1 2 1 19 3 75

7.59 4.35 1.32 1.54 7.45 5.17--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 18 0 6 0 10 2 36

2.79 0.00 3.95 0.00 3.92 3.45--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 160 13 43 11 105 24 356

24.77 56.52 28.29 16.92 41.18 41.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 646 23 152 65 255 58 1199

53.88 1.92 12.68 5.42 21.27 4.84======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 134 161 295

23.89 25.27----------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 215 221 436

38.32 34.69----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

243

Page 245: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Justin Knight 49 26 758.73 4.08

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 18 17 35

3.21 2.67----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 145 212 357

25.85 33.28----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 561 637 1198

46.83 53.17============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 130 131 34 295

36.41 22.24 13.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 95 225 115 435

26.61 38.20 46.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 17 44 14 75

4.76 7.47 5.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 7 22 6 35

1.96 3.74 2.42--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 108 167 79 354

30.25 28.35 31.85

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

244

Page 246: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 589 248 1194

29.90 49.33 20.77======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 65 90 23 44 72 294

26.00 24.52 18.70 40.74 20.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 96 128 45 20 147 436

38.40 34.88 36.59 18.52 42.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 17 23 11 8 16 75

6.80 6.27 8.94 7.41 4.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 1 18 1 5 10 35

0.40 4.90 0.81 4.63 2.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 71 108 43 31 105 358

28.40 29.43 34.96 28.70 30.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 367 123 108 350 1198

20.87 30.63 10.27 9.02 29.22============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

245

Page 247: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 37 80 131 49 297

18.69 25.56 28.42 21.59-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 45 84 181 126 436

22.73 26.84 39.26 55.51-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 17 30 22 5 74

8.59 9.58 4.77 2.20-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 9 12 12 2 35

4.55 3.83 2.60 0.88-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 90 107 115 45 357

45.45 34.19 24.95 19.82-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 313 461 227 1199

16.51 26.11 38.45 18.93===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

246

Page 248: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q19. 2014 Commissioner of Agriculture Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 36 61 51 103 13 8 9 281

59.02 58.65 53.68 28.77 10.57 3.48 4.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 1 3 4 38 44 154 140 384

1.64 2.88 4.21 10.61 35.77 66.96 64.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

247

Page 249: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Rocky Palmquist 0 2 3 14 9 10 14 520.00 1.92 3.16 3.91 7.32 4.35 6.42

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 11 6 8 20 2 10 8 65

18.03 5.77 8.42 5.59 1.63 4.35 3.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 13 32 29 183 55 48 47 407

21.31 30.77 30.53 51.12 44.72 20.87 21.56--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 61 104 95 358 123 230 218 1189

5.13 8.75 7.99 30.11 10.34 19.34 18.33============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 147 103 30 280

56.76 28.77 5.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 8 38 338 384

3.09 10.61 59.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 5 14 33 52

1.93 3.91 5.79--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 25 20 20 65

9.65 5.59 3.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 74 183 149 406

28.57 51.12 26.14

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

248

Page 250: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 259 358 570 1187

21.82 30.16 48.02==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 151 41 66 4 7 5 5 279

59.45 36.94 55.46 3.60 5.79 4.03 1.69-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 9 1 2 17 64 64 217 374

3.54 0.90 1.68 15.32 52.89 51.61 73.31-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 2 7 3 12 12 9 6 51

0.79 6.31 2.52 10.81 9.92 7.26 2.03-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 17 7 14 10 6 4 7 65

6.69 6.31 11.76 9.01 4.96 3.23 2.36-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 75 55 34 68 32 42 61 367

29.53 49.55 28.57 61.26 26.45 33.87 20.61-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 111 119 111 121 124 296 1136

22.36 9.77 10.48 9.77 10.65 10.92 26.06=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

249

Page 251: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 258 4 16 278

53.09 3.60 2.96----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 12 17 345 374

2.47 15.32 63.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 13 12 27 52

2.67 10.81 5.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 38 10 17 65

7.82 9.01 3.15----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 165 68 135 368

33.95 61.26 25.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 111 540 1137

42.74 9.76 47.49====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 12 256 3 9 280

5.00 56.89 1.13 3.80

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

250

Page 252: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 127 10 184 65 386

52.92 2.22 69.43 27.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 5 14 27 6 52

2.08 3.11 10.19 2.53--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 20 37 7 2 66

8.33 8.22 2.64 0.84--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 76 133 44 155 408

31.67 29.56 16.60 65.40--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 450 265 237 1192

20.13 37.75 22.23 19.88============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 8 68 69 28 73 35 281

20.00 19.32 20.85 25.69 29.92 30.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 9 108 111 34 86 39 387

22.50 30.68 33.53 31.19 35.25 34.21---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 4 12 11 1 15 8 51

10.00 3.41 3.32 0.92 6.15 7.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 0 14 14 16 13 8 65

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

251

Page 253: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 3.98 4.23 14.68 5.33 7.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 19 150 126 30 57 24 406

47.50 42.61 38.07 27.52 23.36 21.05---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 352 331 109 244 114 1190

3.36 29.58 27.82 9.16 20.50 9.58=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 30 37 26 83 104 280

16.30 14.02 19.85 29.75 31.80--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 84 119 37 77 68 385

45.65 45.08 28.24 27.60 20.80--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 3 6 11 12 16 48

1.63 2.27 8.40 4.30 4.89--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 9 20 12 7 17 65

4.89 7.58 9.16 2.51 5.20--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 58 82 45 100 122 407

31.52 31.06 34.35 35.84 37.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 184 264 131 279 327 1185

15.53 22.28 11.05 23.54 27.59============================================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

252

Page 254: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 134 58 71 10 0 4 4 281

18.77 37.91 26.10 50.00 0.00 30.77 26.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 326 9 43 1 3 1 4 387

45.66 5.88 15.81 5.00 75.00 7.69 26.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 25 3 16 1 1 0 5 51

3.50 1.96 5.88 5.00 25.00 0.00 33.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 39 11 15 0 0 0 0 65

5.46 7.19 5.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 190 72 127 8 0 8 2 407

26.61 47.06 46.69 40.00 0.00 61.54 13.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 714 153 272 20 4 13 15 1191

59.95 12.85 22.84 1.68 0.34 1.09 1.26============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

253

Page 255: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 127 2 53 14 67 18 281

19.84 8.33 34.87 21.54 26.59 31.58--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 257 5 41 32 42 8 385

40.16 20.83 26.97 49.23 16.67 14.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 39 0 3 0 8 1 51

6.09 0.00 1.97 0.00 3.17 1.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 33 3 6 2 16 6 66

5.16 12.50 3.95 3.08 6.35 10.53--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 184 14 49 17 119 24 407

28.75 58.33 32.24 26.15 47.22 42.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 640 24 152 65 252 57 1190

53.78 2.02 12.77 5.46 21.18 4.79======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 134 146 280

24.06 23.06----------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 195 191 386

35.01 30.17----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

254

Page 256: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Rocky Palmquist 33 19 525.92 3.00

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 34 31 65

6.10 4.90----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 161 246 407

28.90 38.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 557 633 1190

46.81 53.19============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 113 130 37 280

31.83 22.11 15.16--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 75 202 109 386

21.13 34.35 44.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 16 28 8 52

4.51 4.76 3.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 22 37 6 65

6.20 6.29 2.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 129 191 84 404

36.34 32.48 34.43

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

255

Page 257: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 355 588 244 1187

29.91 49.54 20.56======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 64 86 18 46 66 280

26.02 23.37 14.75 42.99 19.02--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 68 114 39 16 149 386

27.64 30.98 31.97 14.95 42.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 11 12 11 5 13 52

4.47 3.26 9.02 4.67 3.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 14 26 4 10 11 65

5.69 7.07 3.28 9.35 3.17--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 89 130 50 30 108 407

36.18 35.33 40.98 28.04 31.12--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 246 368 122 107 347 1190

20.67 30.92 10.25 8.99 29.16============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

256

Page 258: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 30 85 124 41 280

15.31 27.33 27.02 18.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 38 66 169 113 386

19.39 21.22 36.82 50.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 11 15 22 4 52

5.61 4.82 4.79 1.78-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 22 17 15 12 66

11.22 5.47 3.27 5.33-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 95 128 129 55 407

48.47 41.16 28.10 24.44-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 196 311 459 225 1191

16.46 26.11 38.54 18.89===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

257

Page 259: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q20. 2014 Railroad Commission Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 0 1 6 42 43 139 145 376

0.00 0.96 6.32 11.80 34.68 61.23 67.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 38 67 54 101 8 9 10 287

62.30 64.42 56.84 28.37 6.45 3.96 4.63--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

258

Page 260: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Mark Miller 2 3 3 18 15 19 14 743.28 2.88 3.16 5.06 12.10 8.37 6.48

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 8 7 6 19 3 1 6 50

13.11 6.73 6.32 5.34 2.42 0.44 2.78--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 13 26 26 176 55 59 41 396

21.31 25.00 27.37 49.44 44.35 25.99 18.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 61 104 95 356 124 227 216 1183

5.16 8.79 8.03 30.09 10.48 19.19 18.26============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 7 42 327 376

2.71 11.80 57.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 158 101 27 286

61.24 28.37 4.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 8 18 48 74

3.10 5.06 8.45--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 21 19 11 51

8.14 5.34 1.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 64 176 155 395

24.81 49.44 27.29

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

259

Page 261: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 258 356 568 1182

21.83 30.12 48.05==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 3 4 4 18 64 59 215 367

1.18 3.60 3.45 16.22 53.78 47.97 72.64-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 166 47 55 6 5 4 2 285

65.35 42.34 47.41 5.41 4.20 3.25 0.68-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 8 5 5 14 12 11 15 70

3.15 4.50 4.31 12.61 10.08 8.94 5.07-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 9 5 13 5 4 4 5 45

3.54 4.50 11.21 4.50 3.36 3.25 1.69-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 68 50 39 68 34 45 59 363

26.77 45.05 33.62 61.26 28.57 36.59 19.93-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 111 116 111 119 123 296 1130

22.48 9.82 10.27 9.82 10.53 10.88 26.19=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

260

Page 262: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 11 18 339 368

2.29 16.22 62.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 268 6 11 285

55.72 5.41 2.04----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 18 14 38 70

3.74 12.61 7.05----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 27 5 14 46

5.61 4.50 2.60----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 157 68 137 362

32.64 61.26 25.42----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 481 111 539 1131

42.53 9.81 47.66====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 123 7 184 65 379

51.90 1.56 69.96 27.66

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

261

Page 263: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 7 268 5 7 287

2.95 59.82 1.90 2.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 21 17 24 11 73

8.86 3.79 9.13 4.68--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 9 29 4 8 50

3.80 6.47 1.52 3.40--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 77 127 46 144 394

32.49 28.35 17.49 61.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 237 448 263 235 1183

20.03 37.87 22.23 19.86============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 9 103 109 30 88 40 379

21.95 29.51 33.44 26.55 35.63 36.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 3 75 70 30 67 42 287

7.32 21.49 21.47 26.55 27.13 37.84---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 5 18 18 7 15 11 74

12.20 5.16 5.52 6.19 6.07 9.91---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 3 16 11 11 8 2 51

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

262

Page 264: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

7.32 4.58 3.37 9.73 3.24 1.80---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 21 137 118 35 69 16 396

51.22 39.26 36.20 30.97 27.94 14.41---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 349 326 113 247 111 1187

3.45 29.40 27.46 9.52 20.81 9.35=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 79 124 39 68 67 377

42.93 47.33 30.00 24.29 20.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 33 35 33 85 102 288

17.93 13.36 25.38 30.36 31.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 9 16 11 21 14 71

4.89 6.11 8.46 7.50 4.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 2 12 9 11 16 50

1.09 4.58 6.92 3.93 4.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 61 75 38 95 126 395

33.15 28.63 29.23 33.93 38.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 184 262 130 280 325 1181

15.58 22.18 11.01 23.71 27.52============================================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

263

Page 265: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 320 2 44 2 4 2 5 379

44.94 1.31 16.48 9.09 100.00 16.67 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 142 63 69 9 0 1 4 288

19.94 41.18 25.84 40.91 0.00 8.33 28.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 40 10 17 2 0 0 3 72

5.62 6.54 6.37 9.09 0.00 0.00 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 17 8 22 1 0 2 0 50

2.39 5.23 8.24 4.55 0.00 16.67 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 193 70 115 8 0 7 2 395

27.11 45.75 43.07 36.36 0.00 58.33 14.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 712 153 267 22 4 12 14 1184

60.14 12.92 22.55 1.86 0.34 1.01 1.18============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

264

Page 266: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 262 3 36 31 39 7 378

40.81 15.00 23.84 47.69 15.54 12.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 125 2 61 8 77 15 288

19.47 10.00 40.40 12.31 30.68 26.32--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 46 0 5 2 18 3 74

7.17 0.00 3.31 3.08 7.17 5.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 31 0 4 4 7 5 51

4.83 0.00 2.65 6.15 2.79 8.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 178 15 45 20 110 27 395

27.73 75.00 29.80 30.77 43.82 47.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 642 20 151 65 251 57 1186

54.13 1.69 12.73 5.48 21.16 4.81======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 195 184 379

35.14 29.16----------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 144 143 287

25.95 22.66----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

265

Page 267: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Mark Miller 46 28 748.29 4.44

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 19 31 50

3.42 4.91----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 151 245 396

27.21 38.83----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 555 631 1186

46.80 53.20============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 72 202 104 378

20.34 34.59 42.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 129 131 28 288

36.44 22.43 11.48--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 19 43 12 74

5.37 7.36 4.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 13 28 8 49

3.67 4.79 3.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 121 180 92 393

34.18 30.82 37.70

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

266

Page 268: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 354 584 244 1182

29.95 49.41 20.64======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 69 105 42 20 142 378

27.94 28.69 35.29 18.87 40.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 63 84 25 42 74 288

25.51 22.95 21.01 39.62 21.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 12 33 7 8 14 74

4.86 9.02 5.88 7.55 4.03--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 8 20 6 9 7 50

3.24 5.46 5.04 8.49 2.02--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 95 124 39 27 110 395

38.46 33.88 32.77 25.47 31.70--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 247 366 119 106 347 1185

20.84 30.89 10.04 8.95 29.28============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

267

Page 269: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 33 70 166 110 379

16.67 22.80 36.32 49.33-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 39 82 118 48 287

19.70 26.71 25.82 21.52-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 21 20 28 5 74

10.61 6.51 6.13 2.24-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 13 10 19 8 50

6.57 3.26 4.16 3.59-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 92 125 126 52 395

46.46 40.72 27.57 23.32-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 307 457 223 1185

16.71 25.91 38.57 18.82===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

268

Page 270: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q21. 2014 Generic Texas Legislature Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 55 91 77 181 17 17 21 459

88.71 88.35 79.38 50.28 13.71 7.33 9.72--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 2 0 11 78 73 200 184 548

3.23 0.00 11.34 21.67 58.87 86.21 85.19--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

269

Page 271: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Haven't thought about it enoug 5 12 9 101 34 15 11 1878.06 11.65 9.28 28.06 27.42 6.47 5.09

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 97 360 124 232 216 1194

5.19 8.63 8.12 30.15 10.39 19.43 18.09============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 223 181 55 459

84.79 50.28 9.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 14 78 457 549

5.32 21.67 79.90--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 26 101 60 187

9.89 28.06 10.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 360 572 1195

22.01 30.13 47.87==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

270

Page 272: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 236 94 101 16 3 3 0 453

92.55 82.46 84.87 14.16 2.48 2.42 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 3 3 5 34 103 100 289 537

1.18 2.63 4.20 30.09 85.12 80.65 96.98-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 16 17 13 63 15 21 9 154

6.27 14.91 10.92 55.75 12.40 16.94 3.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 114 119 113 121 124 298 1144

22.29 9.97 10.40 9.88 10.58 10.84 26.05=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 431 16 7 454

88.32 14.16 1.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 11 34 492 537

2.25 30.09 90.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 46 63 45 154

9.43 55.75 8.27----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 113 544 1145

42.62 9.87 47.51====================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

271

Page 273: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 8 429 4 17 458

3.32 94.91 1.50 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 214 5 242 90 551

88.80 1.11 90.98 37.82--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 19 18 20 131 188

7.88 3.98 7.52 55.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 452 266 238 1197

20.13 37.76 22.22 19.88============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 10 122 121 52 103 51 459

25.00 34.66 36.45 46.02 42.04 44.74---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 25 156 147 48 116 58 550

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

272

Page 274: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

62.50 44.32 44.28 42.48 47.35 50.88---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 5 74 64 13 26 5 187

12.50 21.02 19.28 11.50 10.61 4.39---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 352 332 113 245 114 1196

3.34 29.43 27.76 9.45 20.48 9.53=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 54 68 53 125 159 459

29.03 25.56 40.15 44.33 48.48--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 106 165 62 112 101 546

56.99 62.03 46.97 39.72 30.79--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 26 33 17 45 68 189

13.98 12.41 12.88 15.96 20.73--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 186 266 132 282 328 1194

15.58 22.28 11.06 23.62 27.47============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

273

Page 275: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 188 130 118 14 0 6 3 459

26.15 84.42 43.38 63.64 0.00 46.15 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 434 4 87 7 4 4 11 551

60.36 2.60 31.99 31.82 100.00 30.77 78.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 97 20 67 1 0 3 0 188

13.49 12.99 24.63 4.55 0.00 23.08 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 719 154 272 22 4 13 14 1198

60.02 12.85 22.70 1.84 0.33 1.09 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 204 6 73 15 133 29 460

31.48 26.09 48.34 23.08 52.36 50.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 355 11 56 38 81 9 550

54.78 47.83 37.09 58.46 31.89 15.79--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 89 6 22 12 40 19 188

13.73 26.09 14.57 18.46 15.75 33.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 23 151 65 254 57 1198

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

274

Page 276: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

54.09 1.92 12.60 5.43 21.20 4.76======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 215 244 459

38.26 38.30----------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 272 279 551

48.40 43.80----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 75 114 189

13.35 17.90----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 562 637 1199

46.87 53.13============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 189 219 51 459

52.94 37.18 20.56

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

275

Page 277: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 112 282 156 550

31.37 47.88 62.90--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 56 88 41 185

15.69 14.94 16.53--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 589 248 1194

29.90 49.33 20.77======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 99 149 40 70 102 460

39.76 40.49 32.52 64.81 29.06--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 114 155 59 23 200 551

45.78 42.12 47.97 21.30 56.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 36 64 24 15 49 188

14.46 17.39 19.51 13.89 13.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 249 368 123 108 351 1199

20.77 30.69 10.26 9.01 29.27============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

276

Page 278: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 91 125 183 61 460

45.96 39.81 39.70 26.99-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 67 124 220 140 551

33.84 39.49 47.72 61.95-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 40 65 58 25 188

20.20 20.70 12.58 11.06-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 461 226 1199

16.51 26.19 38.45 18.85===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

277

Page 279: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q22. Tea Party Support

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 2 0 10 53 46 76 52 239

3.23 0.00 10.31 14.72 37.10 32.76 23.96----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 56 91 80 173 19 14 21 454

90.32 88.35 82.47 48.06 15.32 6.03 9.68----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

278

Page 280: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Tea Party candidate 0 1 0 24 24 104 112 2650.00 0.97 0.00 6.67 19.35 44.83 51.61

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 11 7 110 35 38 32 237

6.45 10.68 7.22 30.56 28.23 16.38 14.75----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 97 360 124 232 217 1195

5.19 8.62 8.12 30.13 10.38 19.41 18.16==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 12 53 174 239

4.58 14.72 30.37--------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 227 173 54 454

86.64 48.06 9.42--------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 1 24 240 265

0.38 6.67 41.88--------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 22 110 105 237

8.40 30.56 18.32--------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 360 573 1195

21.92 30.13 47.95====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

279

Page 281: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 4 7 1 15 19 56 131 233

1.56 6.09 0.85 13.27 15.70 45.16 43.96-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 237 88 103 12 3 5 0 448

92.58 76.52 87.29 10.62 2.48 4.03 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 0 1 0 32 67 37 124 261

0.00 0.87 0.00 28.32 55.37 29.84 41.61-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 15 19 14 54 32 26 43 203

5.86 16.52 11.86 47.79 26.45 20.97 14.43-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 115 118 113 121 124 298 1145

22.36 10.04 10.31 9.87 10.57 10.83 26.03===============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 12 15 206 233

2.45 13.27 37.94----------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

280

Page 282: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Democratic candidate 428 12 8 44887.53 10.62 1.47

----------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 1 32 229 262

0.20 28.32 42.17----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 48 54 100 202

9.82 47.79 18.42----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 489 113 543 1145

42.71 9.87 47.42======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 241 0 0 0 241

100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 0 454 0 0 454

0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 0 0 266 0 266

0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 0 0 238 238

0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 454 266 238 1199

20.10 37.86 22.19 19.85

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

281

Page 283: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==============================================================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 8 90 67 16 33 28 242

19.51 25.50 20.18 14.04 13.41 24.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 14 118 119 53 103 47 454

34.15 33.43 35.84 46.49 41.87 40.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 10 68 70 22 72 25 267

24.39 19.26 21.08 19.30 29.27 21.74---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 9 77 76 23 38 15 238

21.95 21.81 22.89 20.18 15.45 13.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 353 332 114 246 115 1201

3.41 29.39 27.64 9.49 20.48 9.58=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

282

Page 284: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Republican candidate 48 68 27 55 42 24025.53 25.66 20.45 19.50 12.80

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 55 57 54 128 161 455

29.26 21.51 40.91 45.39 49.09------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 44 86 30 45 58 263

23.40 32.45 22.73 15.96 17.68------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 41 54 21 54 67 237

21.81 20.38 15.91 19.15 20.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 265 132 282 328 1195

15.73 22.18 11.05 23.60 27.45========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 165 3 65 5 0 2 0 240

22.98 1.92 23.90 23.81 0.00 14.29 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 195 126 114 12 0 5 3 455

27.16 80.77 41.91 57.14 0.00 35.71 21.43-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 208 4 35 2 3 3 10 265

28.97 2.56 12.87 9.52 100.00 21.43 71.43-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 150 23 58 2 0 4 1 238

20.89 14.74 21.32 9.52 0.00 28.57 7.14

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

283

Page 285: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 156 272 21 3 14 14 1198

59.93 13.02 22.70 1.75 0.25 1.17 1.17=========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 135 10 27 18 46 4 240

20.83 43.48 17.88 27.69 18.04 7.02--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 200 6 79 13 131 26 455

30.86 26.09 52.32 20.00 51.37 45.61--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 189 2 22 12 33 9 267

29.17 8.70 14.57 18.46 12.94 15.79--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 124 5 23 22 45 18 237

19.14 21.74 15.23 33.85 17.65 31.58--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 23 151 65 255 57 1199

54.05 1.92 12.59 5.42 21.27 4.75========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

284

Page 286: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

genderQ Male Female Total----------------------------------------------Republican candidate 98 143 241

17.47 22.38----------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 207 248 455

36.90 38.81----------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 181 85 266

32.26 13.30----------------------------------------------Don't know 75 163 238

13.37 25.51----------------------------------------------Total 561 639 1200

46.75 53.25==============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 62 111 67 240

17.42 18.81 27.02--------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 180 222 52 454

50.56 37.63 20.97--------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 53 150 62 265

14.89 25.42 25.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

285

Page 287: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------Don't know 61 107 67 235

17.13 18.14 27.02--------------------------------------------------------Total 356 590 248 1194

29.82 49.41 20.77========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 56 66 29 17 73 241

22.31 17.98 23.77 15.89 20.80---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 100 156 35 60 103 454

39.84 42.51 28.69 56.07 29.34---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 50 77 27 18 94 266

19.92 20.98 22.13 16.82 26.78---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 45 68 31 12 81 237

17.93 18.53 25.41 11.21 23.08---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 367 122 107 351 1198

20.95 30.63 10.18 8.93 29.30===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

286

Page 288: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 43 65 81 52 241

21.83 20.70 17.57 22.91-------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 86 126 180 63 455

43.65 40.13 39.05 27.75-------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 23 55 127 60 265

11.68 17.52 27.55 26.43-------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 45 68 73 52 238

22.84 21.66 15.84 22.91-------------------------------------------------------------Total 197 314 461 227 1199

16.43 26.19 38.45 18.93=============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

287

Page 289: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q23. Tea Party Influence

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 44 78 63 135 29 19 16 384

69.84 75.00 64.95 37.40 23.39 8.23 7.44-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 6 6 10 43 34 122 110 331

9.52 5.77 10.31 11.91 27.42 52.81 51.16-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

288

Page 290: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

The right amount of influence 5 5 11 78 35 67 54 2557.94 4.81 11.34 21.61 28.23 29.00 25.12

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 15 13 105 26 23 35 225

12.70 14.42 13.40 29.09 20.97 9.96 16.28-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 104 97 361 124 231 215 1195

5.27 8.70 8.12 30.21 10.38 19.33 17.99===========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 185 135 64 384

70.34 37.40 11.21-----------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 21 43 267 331

7.98 11.91 46.76-----------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 21 78 156 255

7.98 21.61 27.32-----------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 36 105 84 225

13.69 29.09 14.71-----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 361 571 1195

22.01 30.21 47.78=============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

289

Page 291: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 161 56 93 20 9 23 15 377

62.89 49.56 78.15 17.86 7.44 18.55 5.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 17 15 9 27 64 51 143 326

6.64 13.27 7.56 24.11 52.89 41.13 48.15--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 31 16 9 29 36 28 96 245

12.11 14.16 7.56 25.89 29.75 22.58 32.32--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 47 26 8 36 12 22 43 194

18.36 23.01 6.72 32.14 9.92 17.74 14.48--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 113 119 112 121 124 297 1142

22.42 9.89 10.42 9.81 10.60 10.86 26.01========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 310 20 47 377

63.39 17.86 8.67-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

290

Page 292: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Too little influence 41 27 258 3268.38 24.11 47.60

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 56 29 160 245

11.45 25.89 29.52-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 82 36 77 195

16.77 32.14 14.21-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 489 112 542 1143

42.78 9.80 47.42===============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 48 314 0 22 384

19.92 69.16 0.00 9.24-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 45 38 208 42 333

18.67 8.37 78.49 17.65-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 89 50 55 61 255

36.93 11.01 20.75 25.63-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 59 52 2 113 226

24.48 11.45 0.75 47.48-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 454 265 238 1198

20.12 37.90 22.12 19.87

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

291

Page 293: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=======================================================================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 6 84 97 42 94 61 384

15.00 23.93 29.22 36.84 38.06 53.98------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 16 82 95 36 72 31 332

40.00 23.36 28.61 31.58 29.15 27.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 7 93 60 23 54 18 255

17.50 26.50 18.07 20.18 21.86 15.93------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 11 92 80 13 27 3 226

27.50 26.21 24.10 11.40 10.93 2.65------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 351 332 114 247 113 1197

3.34 29.32 27.74 9.52 20.63 9.44==================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

292

Page 294: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Too much influence 38 60 37 113 137 38520.11 22.64 28.03 40.21 41.64

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 56 99 36 62 76 329

29.63 37.36 27.27 22.06 23.10---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 48 59 36 65 47 255

25.40 22.26 27.27 23.13 14.29---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 47 47 23 41 69 227

24.87 17.74 17.42 14.59 20.97---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 189 265 132 281 329 1196

15.80 22.16 11.04 23.49 27.51=================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~AC Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 212 76 79 7 0 7 3 384

29.57 49.03 29.04 33.33 0.00 53.85 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 240 14 60 4 3 3 9 333

33.47 9.03 22.06 19.05 75.00 23.08 64.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 148 25 67 10 1 2 1 254

20.64 16.13 24.63 47.62 25.00 15.38 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 117 40 66 0 0 1 1 225

16.32 25.81 24.26 0.00 0.00 7.69 7.14

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

293

Page 295: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 717 155 272 21 4 13 14 1196

59.95 12.96 22.74 1.76 0.33 1.09 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 184 3 66 13 94 24 384

28.40 12.50 44.00 20.00 37.01 42.11-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 222 6 31 20 43 10 332

34.26 25.00 20.67 30.77 16.93 17.54-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 141 4 21 19 61 9 255

21.76 16.67 14.00 29.23 24.02 15.79-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 101 11 32 13 56 14 227

15.59 45.83 21.33 20.00 22.05 24.56-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 24 150 65 254 57 1198

54.09 2.00 12.52 5.43 21.20 4.76=================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

294

Page 296: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

genderQ Male Female Total-------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 183 201 384

32.62 31.60-------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 183 149 332

32.62 23.43-------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 135 120 255

24.06 18.87-------------------------------------------------------Don't know 60 166 226

10.70 26.10-------------------------------------------------------Total 561 636 1197

46.87 53.13=======================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total-----------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 139 193 51 383

39.04 32.71 20.65-----------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 78 173 81 332

21.91 29.32 32.79-----------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 61 136 58 255

17.13 23.05 23.48

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

295

Page 297: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 78 88 57 223

21.91 14.92 23.08-----------------------------------------------------------------Total 356 590 247 1193

29.84 49.46 20.70=================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 89 125 30 56 83 383

35.60 34.06 24.59 52.34 23.71------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 68 97 36 13 117 331

27.20 26.43 29.51 12.15 33.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 51 73 30 22 81 257

20.40 19.89 24.59 20.56 23.14------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 42 72 26 16 69 225

16.80 19.62 21.31 14.95 19.71------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 367 122 107 350 1196

20.90 30.69 10.20 8.95 29.26====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

296

Page 298: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

======================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 51 98 168 67 384

25.76 31.21 36.52 29.52----------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 44 65 150 73 332

22.22 20.70 32.61 32.16----------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 43 71 87 55 256

21.72 22.61 18.91 24.23----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 60 80 55 32 227

30.30 25.48 11.96 14.10----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 460 227 1199

16.51 26.19 38.37 18.93======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

297

Page 299: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q25. 2016 Republican Presidential Primary Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 0 0 2 12 11 66 84 175

0.00 0.00 18.18 20.34 14.10 32.84 46.15--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 1 0 0 5 4 17 13 40

33.33 0.00 0.00 8.47 5.13 8.46 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

298

Page 300: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Rand Paul 0 0 0 6 7 22 13 480.00 0.00 0.00 10.17 8.97 10.95 7.14

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 0 1 0 6 10 9 10 36

0.00 100.00 0.00 10.17 12.82 4.48 5.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 0 0 0 8 12 11 6 37

0.00 0.00 0.00 13.56 15.38 5.47 3.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 0 0 0 3 2 2 4 11

0.00 0.00 0.00 5.08 2.56 1.00 2.20--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 0 0 0 0 3 10 8 21

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.85 4.98 4.40--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 0 0 0 1 3 22 3 29

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.69 3.85 10.95 1.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 0 0 2 3 2 10 0 17

0.00 0.00 18.18 5.08 2.56 4.98 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 2 0 0 1 1 1 3 8

66.67 0.00 0.00 1.69 1.28 0.50 1.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 0 0 7 2 7 10 19 45

0.00 0.00 63.64 3.39 8.97 4.98 10.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about i 0 0 0 12 16 21 19 68

0.00 0.00 0.00 20.34 20.51 10.45 10.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 3 1 11 59 78 201 182 535

0.56 0.19 2.06 11.03 14.58 37.57 34.02============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

299

Page 301: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 2 12 160 174

13.33 20.34 34.78--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 1 5 34 40

6.67 8.47 7.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 0 6 42 48

0.00 10.17 9.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 1 6 28 35

6.67 10.17 6.09--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 0 8 29 37

0.00 13.56 6.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 0 3 9 12

0.00 5.08 1.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 0 0 21 21

0.00 0.00 4.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 0 1 29 30

0.00 1.69 6.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 2 3 11 16

13.33 5.08 2.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 2 1 5 8

13.33 1.69 1.09

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

300

Page 302: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 7 2 36 45

46.67 3.39 7.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 0 12 56 68

0.00 20.34 12.17--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 15 59 460 534

2.81 11.05 86.14==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 0 0 1 6 43 25 96 171

0.00 0.00 20.00 21.43 43.43 24.51 33.57-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 0 1 0 0 5 8 26 40

0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 5.05 7.84 9.09-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 0 0 0 8 16 7 16 47

0.00 0.00 0.00 28.57 16.16 6.86 5.59-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 1 1 0 2 4 7 19 34

25.00 50.00 0.00 7.14 4.04 6.86 6.64-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 0 0 0 0 4 13 20 37

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.04 12.75 6.99-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 0 0 0 0 2 0 9 11

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

301

Page 303: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.02 0.00 3.15-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 1 0 0 0 3 7 11 22

25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.03 6.86 3.85-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 0 0 1 0 2 3 24 30

0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 2.02 2.94 8.39-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 0 0 1 1 0 5 7 14

0.00 0.00 20.00 3.57 0.00 4.90 2.45-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 0 0 0 2 0 4 2 8

0.00 0.00 0.00 7.14 0.00 3.92 0.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 2 0 0 3 8 6 25 44

50.00 0.00 0.00 10.71 8.08 5.88 8.74-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 0 0 2 6 12 17 31 68

0.00 0.00 40.00 21.43 12.12 16.67 10.84-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 4 2 5 28 99 102 286 526

0.76 0.38 0.95 5.32 18.82 19.39 54.37=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 1 6 164 171

9.09 21.43 33.74----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

302

Page 304: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Rick Perry 1 0 39 409.09 0.00 8.02

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 0 8 39 47

0.00 28.57 8.02----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 2 2 30 34

18.18 7.14 6.17----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 0 0 37 37

0.00 0.00 7.61----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 0 0 12 12

0.00 0.00 2.47----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 1 0 21 22

9.09 0.00 4.32----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 1 0 28 29

9.09 0.00 5.76----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 1 1 13 15

9.09 3.57 2.67----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 0 2 5 7

0.00 7.14 1.03----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 2 3 39 44

18.18 10.71 8.02----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 2 6 59 67

18.18 21.43 12.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 11 28 486 525

2.10 5.33 92.57====================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

303

Page 305: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 35 0 119 22 176

17.33 0.00 50.00 24.72--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 28 0 3 9 40

13.86 0.00 1.26 10.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 7 0 36 5 48

3.47 0.00 15.13 5.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 18 1 11 5 35

8.91 12.50 4.62 5.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 26 2 3 7 38

12.87 25.00 1.26 7.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 5 0 7 0 12

2.48 0.00 2.94 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 4 0 14 3 21

1.98 0.00 5.88 3.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 17 0 10 2 29

8.42 0.00 4.20 2.25--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 15 1 0 0 16

7.43 12.50 0.00 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

304

Page 306: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 4 0 1 2 7

1.98 0.00 0.42 2.25--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 17 2 20 7 46

8.42 25.00 8.40 7.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 26 2 14 27 69

12.87 25.00 5.88 30.34--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 202 8 238 89 537

37.62 1.49 44.32 16.57============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 5 43 49 21 44 15 177

38.46 27.74 31.61 47.73 37.93 28.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 2 11 14 3 7 2 39

15.38 7.10 9.03 6.82 6.03 3.77---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 1 8 11 6 15 7 48

7.69 5.16 7.10 13.64 12.93 13.21---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 0 7 14 2 6 4 33

0.00 4.52 9.03 4.55 5.17 7.55---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 1 12 12 3 9 1 38

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

305

Page 307: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

7.69 7.74 7.74 6.82 7.76 1.89---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 0 5 3 1 1 2 12

0.00 3.23 1.94 2.27 0.86 3.77---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 1 9 5 1 4 0 20

7.69 5.81 3.23 2.27 3.45 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 1 10 4 0 6 8 29

7.69 6.45 2.58 0.00 5.17 15.09---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 0 8 2 0 1 6 17

0.00 5.16 1.29 0.00 0.86 11.32---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 0 3 1 2 2 0 8

0.00 1.94 0.65 4.55 1.72 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 1 17 14 2 8 4 46

7.69 10.97 9.03 4.55 6.90 7.55---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 1 22 26 3 13 4 69

7.69 14.19 16.77 6.82 11.21 7.55---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 13 155 155 44 116 53 536

2.43 28.92 28.92 8.21 21.64 9.89=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

306

Page 308: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Ted Cruz 31 56 18 37 35 17729.52 34.78 30.00 33.33 35.71

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 6 13 5 11 4 39

5.71 8.07 8.33 9.91 4.08--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 11 9 6 10 9 45

10.48 5.59 10.00 9.01 9.18--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 4 10 6 4 12 36

3.81 6.21 10.00 3.60 12.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 3 8 6 11 9 37

2.86 4.97 10.00 9.91 9.18--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 3 2 0 5 1 11

2.86 1.24 0.00 4.50 1.02--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 5 7 3 2 5 22

4.76 4.35 5.00 1.80 5.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 6 13 1 9 0 29

5.71 8.07 1.67 8.11 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 6 7 0 0 4 17

5.71 4.35 0.00 0.00 4.08--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 2 4 0 1 1 8

1.90 2.48 0.00 0.90 1.02--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 11 19 2 6 7 45

10.48 11.80 3.33 5.41 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have 17 13 13 15 11 69

16.19 8.07 21.67 13.51 11.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

307

Page 309: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Total 105 161 60 111 98 53519.63 30.09 11.21 20.75 18.32

============================================================================================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 141 0 23 2 3 2 6 177

32.64 NaN 27.38 50.00 75.00 66.67 60.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 32 0 8 0 0 0 0 40

7.41 NaN 9.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 39 0 5 0 1 1 3 49

9.03 NaN 5.95 0.00 25.00 33.33 30.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 29 0 5 0 0 0 0 34

6.71 NaN 5.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 31 0 7 0 0 0 0 38

7.18 NaN 8.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 12

1.39 NaN 7.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 19 0 2 0 0 0 0 21

4.40 NaN 2.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 27 0 2 0 0 0 0 29

6.25 NaN 2.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

308

Page 310: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 7 0 9 0 0 0 0 16

1.62 NaN 10.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 8

0.93 NaN 4.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 40 0 4 1 0 0 0 45

9.26 NaN 4.76 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to 57 0 9 1 0 0 1 68

13.19 NaN 10.71 25.00 0.00 0.00 10.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 432 0 84 4 4 3 10 537

80.45 0.00 15.64 0.74 0.74 0.56 1.86============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 121 0 21 7 22 5 176

33.80 0.00 38.18 20.59 29.73 55.56--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 23 1 5 4 7 0 40

6.42 12.50 9.09 11.76 9.46 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 37 1 4 1 5 0 48

10.34 12.50 7.27 2.94 6.76 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 19 0 6 5 3 1 34

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

309

Page 311: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

5.31 0.00 10.91 14.71 4.05 11.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 25 3 3 5 2 1 39

6.98 37.50 5.45 14.71 2.70 11.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 7 0 0 0 5 0 12

1.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.76 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 12 0 1 1 5 2 21

3.35 0.00 1.82 2.94 6.76 22.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 20 0 2 4 4 0 30

5.59 0.00 3.64 11.76 5.41 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 9 0 0 0 8 0 17

2.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.81 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 5 0 2 1 0 0 8

1.40 0.00 3.64 2.94 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 28 2 5 4 6 0 45

7.82 25.00 9.09 11.76 8.11 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 52 1 6 2 7 0 68

14.53 12.50 10.91 5.88 9.46 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 358 8 55 34 74 9 538

66.54 1.49 10.22 6.32 13.75 1.67======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

310

Page 312: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

genderQ Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 103 73 176

37.73 27.65----------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 13 27 40

4.76 10.23----------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 33 15 48

12.09 5.68----------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 18 17 35

6.59 6.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 9 29 38

3.30 10.98----------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 7 4 11

2.56 1.52----------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 15 6 21

5.49 2.27----------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 14 16 30

5.13 6.06----------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 12 5 17

4.40 1.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 2 5 7

0.73 1.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 23 22 45

8.42 8.33----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

311

Page 313: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 24 45 698.79 17.05

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 273 264 537

50.84 49.16============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 34 98 45 177

31.78 34.15 31.25--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 10 17 12 39

9.35 5.92 8.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 5 30 13 48

4.67 10.45 9.03--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 11 19 4 34

10.28 6.62 2.78--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 7 21 10 38

6.54 7.32 6.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 2 8 2 12

1.87 2.79 1.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 5 11 5 21

4.67 3.83 3.47

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

312

Page 314: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 7 10 13 30

6.54 3.48 9.03--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 8 8 0 16

7.48 2.79 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 2 4 2 8

1.87 1.39 1.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 4 22 20 46

3.74 7.67 13.89--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 12 39 18 69

11.21 13.59 12.50--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 107 287 144 538

19.89 53.35 26.77======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 35 55 20 1 65 176

33.98 34.16 32.26 3.70 34.95--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 10 12 6 1 11 40

9.71 7.45 9.68 3.70 5.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 6 8 9 8 17 48

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

313

Page 315: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

5.83 4.97 14.52 29.63 9.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 8 12 5 4 7 36

7.77 7.45 8.06 14.81 3.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 9 11 5 1 11 37

8.74 6.83 8.06 3.70 5.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 1 3 3 0 5 12

0.97 1.86 4.84 0.00 2.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 4 7 1 3 6 21

3.88 4.35 1.61 11.11 3.23--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 10 6 2 0 12 30

9.71 3.73 3.23 0.00 6.45--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 3 2 6 3 2 16

2.91 1.24 9.68 11.11 1.08--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 0 4 0 2 2 8

0.00 2.48 0.00 7.41 1.08--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 3 15 0 2 26 46

2.91 9.32 0.00 7.41 13.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to ha 14 26 5 2 22 69

13.59 16.15 8.06 7.41 11.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 103 161 62 27 186 539

19.11 29.87 11.50 5.01 34.51============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

314

Page 316: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 14 44 77 41 176

22.58 36.07 35.32 30.15-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 9 9 14 8 40

14.52 7.38 6.42 5.88-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 8 7 26 7 48

12.90 5.74 11.93 5.15-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 5 7 7 16 35

8.06 5.74 3.21 11.76-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 0 5 16 17 38

0.00 4.10 7.34 12.50-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 1 2 6 2 11

1.61 1.64 2.75 1.47-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 1 5 9 6 21

1.61 4.10 4.13 4.41-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 5 8 10 7 30

8.06 6.56 4.59 5.15-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 1 8 8 0 17

1.61 6.56 3.67 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 0 3 1 4 8

0.00 2.46 0.46 2.94-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

315

Page 317: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Mike Huckabee 11 8 16 11 4617.74 6.56 7.34 8.09

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 7 16 28 17 68

11.29 13.11 12.84 12.50-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 122 218 136 538

11.52 22.68 40.52 25.28===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

316

Page 318: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q26. 2016 Democratic Presidential Primary Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 24 65 41 116 9 8 8 271

46.15 78.31 67.21 65.54 60.00 53.33 47.06--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 3 2 4 19 0 4 1 33

5.77 2.41 6.56 10.73 0.00 26.67 5.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

317

Page 319: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Elizabeth Warren 22 12 10 17 1 0 2 6442.31 14.46 16.39 9.60 6.67 0.00 11.76

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 0 1 0 4 0 3 0 8

0.00 1.20 0.00 2.26 0.00 20.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 4

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.69 6.67 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about i 3 3 6 18 4 0 6 40

5.77 3.61 9.84 10.17 26.67 0.00 35.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 52 83 61 177 15 15 17 420

12.38 19.76 14.52 42.14 3.57 3.57 4.05============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 129 116 26 271

66.15 65.54 50.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 9 19 6 34

4.62 10.73 11.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 44 17 4 65

22.56 9.60 7.84

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

318

Page 320: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 1 4 3 8

0.51 2.26 5.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 0 3 1 4

0.00 1.69 1.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 12 18 11 41

6.15 10.17 21.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 195 177 51 423

46.10 41.84 12.06==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 156 54 47 2 2 4 1 266

66.38 62.79 64.38 20.00 50.00 100.00 33.33-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 17 9 4 3 0 0 1 34

7.23 10.47 5.48 30.00 0.00 0.00 33.33-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 37 10 16 0 1 0 0 64

15.74 11.63 21.92 0.00 25.00 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

319

Page 321: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 5 2 0 1 0 0 0 8

2.13 2.33 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 4

1.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 17 11 6 4 1 0 0 39

7.23 12.79 8.22 40.00 25.00 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 235 86 73 10 4 4 3 415

56.63 20.72 17.59 2.41 0.96 0.96 0.72=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 257 2 7 266

65.23 20.00 63.64----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 30 3 1 34

7.61 30.00 9.09----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 63 0 1 64

15.99 0.00 9.09----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

320

Page 322: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Andrew Cuomo 7 1 0 81.78 10.00 0.00

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 3 0 1 4

0.76 0.00 9.09----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 34 4 1 39

8.63 40.00 9.09----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 394 10 11 415

94.94 2.41 2.65====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 5 253 2 12 272

31.25 65.89 66.67 57.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 4 29 0 2 35

25.00 7.55 0.00 9.52--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 1 63 0 0 64

6.25 16.41 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 0 7 0 1 8

0.00 1.82 0.00 4.76

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

321

Page 323: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 4 0 0 0 4

25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 2 32 1 6 41

12.50 8.33 33.33 28.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 16 384 3 21 424

3.77 90.57 0.71 4.95============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 10 76 70 34 59 23 272

66.67 64.41 63.06 75.56 63.44 52.27---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 1 8 10 2 6 7 34

6.67 6.78 9.01 4.44 6.45 15.91---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 0 21 15 1 20 7 64

0.00 17.80 13.51 2.22 21.51 15.91---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 0 2 1 3 0 3 9

0.00 1.69 0.90 6.67 0.00 6.82---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 0 3 0 0 2 0 5

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

322

Page 324: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 2.54 0.00 0.00 2.15 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 4 8 15 5 6 4 42

26.67 6.78 13.51 11.11 6.45 9.09---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 15 118 111 45 93 44 426

3.52 27.70 26.06 10.56 21.83 10.33=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 33 41 35 76 88 273

67.35 62.12 72.92 66.09 60.27--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 7 6 5 5 11 34

14.29 9.09 10.42 4.35 7.53--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 4 6 2 22 30 64

8.16 9.09 4.17 19.13 20.55--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 3 3 1 1 0 8

6.12 4.55 2.08 0.87 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 0 4 0 0 0 4

0.00 6.06 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

323

Page 325: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Haven't thought enough about it to have 2 6 5 11 17 414.08 9.09 10.42 9.57 11.64

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 49 66 48 115 146 424

11.56 15.57 11.32 27.12 34.43============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 103 85 79 3 0 3 0 273

60.59 65.89 73.83 27.27 NaN 42.86 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 9 20 6 0 0 0 0 35

5.29 15.50 5.61 0.00 NaN 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 42 3 9 7 0 1 3 65

24.71 2.33 8.41 63.64 NaN 14.29 100.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NaN 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 8

1.76 2.33 1.87 0.00 NaN 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 4

0.00 0.00 2.80 9.09 NaN 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it t 13 18 8 0 0 3 0 42

7.65 13.95 7.48 0.00 NaN 42.86 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

324

Page 326: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 170 129 107 11 0 7 3 427

39.81 30.21 25.06 2.58 0.00 1.64 0.70============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 120 7 55 14 66 11 273

65.93 70.00 77.46 82.35 55.00 45.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 16 0 3 0 13 2 34

8.79 0.00 4.23 0.00 10.83 8.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 31 0 7 0 20 5 63

17.03 0.00 9.86 0.00 16.67 20.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 1 0 4 1 3 0 9

0.55 0.00 5.63 5.88 2.50 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 2 3 0 0 0 0 5

1.10 30.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 12 0 2 2 18 6 40

6.59 0.00 2.82 11.76 15.00 25.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 182 10 71 17 120 24 424

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

325

Page 327: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

42.92 2.36 16.75 4.01 28.30 5.66======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 118 154 272

60.51 67.54----------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 12 22 34

6.15 9.65----------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 38 26 64

19.49 11.40----------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0

0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 5 3 8

2.56 1.32----------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 0 4 4

0.00 1.75----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 22 19 41

11.28 8.33----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 195 228 423

46.10 53.90============================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

326

Page 328: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 117 127 29 273

66.86 63.82 58.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 11 19 4 34

6.29 9.55 8.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 23 31 10 64

13.14 15.58 20.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 1 6 1 8

0.57 3.02 2.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 3 0 1 4

1.71 0.00 2.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 20 16 5 41

11.43 8.04 10.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 175 199 50 424

41.27 46.93 11.79======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

327

Page 329: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 61 90 25 36 60 272

58.65 72.58 69.44 59.02 60.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 12 9 2 6 6 35

11.54 7.26 5.56 9.84 6.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 14 13 8 12 18 65

13.46 10.48 22.22 19.67 18.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 3 3 0 0 2 8

2.88 2.42 0.00 0.00 2.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 3 0 0 0 1 4

2.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to ha 11 9 1 7 13 41

10.58 7.26 2.78 11.48 13.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 104 124 36 61 100 425

24.47 29.18 8.47 14.35 23.53============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

328

Page 330: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 34 67 122 49 272

47.89 56.78 70.52 77.78-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 12 9 11 2 34

16.90 7.63 6.36 3.17-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 11 20 27 7 65

15.49 16.95 15.61 11.11-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 0 3 2 3 8

0.00 2.54 1.16 4.76-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 0 5 0 0 5

0.00 4.24 0.00 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 14 14 11 2 41

19.72 11.86 6.36 3.17-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 71 118 173 63 425

16.71 27.76 40.71 14.82===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

329

Page 331: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Political Figure Favorability Ratings

Q27. Ted Cruz Favorability

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 3 1 2 30 28 131 149 344

4.84 0.97 2.08 8.33 22.58 56.71 68.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 3 7 8 43 40 64 33 198

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

330

Page 332: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

4.84 6.80 8.33 11.94 32.26 27.71 15.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavora 2 2 4 61 15 16 13 113

3.23 1.94 4.17 16.94 12.10 6.93 6.02--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 3 4 7 40 10 6 5 75

4.84 3.88 7.29 11.11 8.06 2.60 2.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 43 76 65 118 20 8 5 335

69.35 73.79 67.71 32.78 16.13 3.46 2.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 8 13 10 68 11 6 11 127

12.90 12.62 10.42 18.89 8.87 2.60 5.09--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 96 360 124 231 216 1192

5.20 8.64 8.05 30.20 10.40 19.38 18.12============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 6 30 308 344

2.28 8.33 54.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 18 43 137 198

6.84 11.94 24.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 9 61 44 114

3.42 16.94 7.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

331

Page 333: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Somewhat unfavorable 14 40 21 755.32 11.11 3.68

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 185 118 33 336

70.34 32.78 5.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 31 68 27 126

11.79 18.89 4.74---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 360 570 1193

22.05 30.18 47.78=================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 8 2 0 21 74 40 194 339

3.16 1.75 0.00 18.75 62.18 32.26 65.32------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 19 19 4 21 26 37 61 187

7.51 16.67 3.36 18.75 21.85 29.84 20.54------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 24 15 7 25 6 12 17 106

9.49 13.16 5.88 22.32 5.04 9.68 5.72------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 19 18 8 4 3 14 8 74

7.51 15.79 6.72 3.57 2.52 11.29 2.69------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 152 48 92 18 5 6 8 329

60.08 42.11 77.31 16.07 4.20 4.84 2.69

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

332

Page 334: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 31 12 8 23 5 15 9 103

12.25 10.53 6.72 20.54 4.20 12.10 3.03------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 253 114 119 112 119 124 297 1138

22.23 10.02 10.46 9.84 10.46 10.90 26.10============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 10 21 309 340

2.06 18.75 56.91-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 42 21 125 188

8.64 18.75 23.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 46 25 36 107

9.47 22.32 6.63-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 45 4 25 74

9.26 3.57 4.60-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 292 18 19 329

60.08 16.07 3.50-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 51 23 29 103

10.49 20.54 5.34-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 112 543 1141

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

333

Page 335: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

42.59 9.82 47.59===================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 76 9 209 52 346

31.54 2.00 78.57 21.94---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 74 38 38 47 197

30.71 8.44 14.29 19.83---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 31 35 13 34 113

12.86 7.78 4.89 14.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 24 37 4 10 75

9.96 8.22 1.50 4.22---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 15 299 1 22 337

6.22 66.44 0.38 9.28---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 21 32 1 72 126

8.71 7.11 0.38 30.38---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 450 266 237 1194

20.18 37.69 22.28 19.85===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

334

Page 336: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 11 98 86 34 84 34 347

27.50 27.84 26.22 30.09 34.01 29.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 7 63 62 20 30 15 197

17.50 17.90 18.90 17.70 12.15 13.04----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 3 41 33 11 21 4 113

7.50 11.65 10.06 9.73 8.50 3.48----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 1 24 19 6 10 15 75

2.50 6.82 5.79 5.31 4.05 13.04----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 7 77 86 33 89 45 337

17.50 21.88 26.22 29.20 36.03 39.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 11 49 42 9 13 2 126

27.50 13.92 12.80 7.96 5.26 1.74----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 352 328 113 247 115 1195

3.35 29.46 27.45 9.46 20.67 9.62======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================attend

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

335

Page 337: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 77 104 33 67 62 343

40.74 39.25 25.19 23.67 19.08-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 32 48 38 47 32 197

16.93 18.11 29.01 16.61 9.85-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 17 26 12 34 25 114

8.99 9.81 9.16 12.01 7.69-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 12 19 9 19 16 75

6.35 7.17 6.87 6.71 4.92-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 29 40 28 93 147 337

15.34 15.09 21.37 32.86 45.23-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 22 28 11 23 43 127

11.64 10.57 8.40 8.13 13.23-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 189 265 131 283 325 1193

15.84 22.21 10.98 23.72 27.24=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA ge Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 276 7 46 4 3 2 9 347

38.44 4.61 16.85 18.18 100.00 15.38 60.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

336

Page 338: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Somewhat favorable 118 15 56 4 0 1 3 19716.43 9.87 20.51 18.18 0.00 7.69 20.00

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 51 22 28 8 0 4 0 113

7.10 14.47 10.26 36.36 0.00 30.77 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 35 19 16 3 0 2 0 75

4.87 12.50 5.86 13.64 0.00 15.38 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 189 61 78 2 0 4 3 337

26.32 40.13 28.57 9.09 0.00 30.77 20.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 49 28 49 1 0 0 0 127

6.82 18.42 17.95 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 152 273 22 3 13 15 1196

60.03 12.71 22.83 1.84 0.25 1.09 1.25============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 236 1 31 22 49 6 345

36.42 4.35 20.26 33.85 19.52 10.53---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 114 5 20 11 42 6 198

17.59 21.74 13.07 16.92 16.73 10.53---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 52 4 10 9 31 8 114

8.02 17.39 6.54 13.85 12.35 14.04

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

337

Page 339: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 37 3 10 6 16 3 75

5.71 13.04 6.54 9.23 6.37 5.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 156 3 74 16 66 23 338

24.07 13.04 48.37 24.62 26.29 40.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 53 7 8 1 47 11 127

8.18 30.43 5.23 1.54 18.73 19.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 23 153 65 251 57 1197

54.14 1.92 12.78 5.43 20.97 4.76=====================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 202 144 346

36.14 22.64-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 98 99 197

17.53 15.57-----------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 35 78 113

6.26 12.26-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 24 51 75

4.29 8.02-----------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 167 170 337

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

338

Page 340: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

29.87 26.73-----------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 33 94 127

5.90 14.78-----------------------------------------------------------Total 559 636 1195

46.78 53.22===========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 70 183 93 346

19.83 31.02 37.65---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 52 92 53 197

14.73 15.59 21.46---------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 38 56 18 112

10.76 9.49 7.29---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 23 40 11 74

6.52 6.78 4.45---------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 135 163 40 338

38.24 27.63 16.19---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 35 56 32 123

9.92 9.49 12.96---------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

339

Page 341: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Total 353 590 247 119029.66 49.58 20.76

=====================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 63 103 37 14 129 346

25.20 28.07 30.33 12.96 37.07----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 43 47 30 20 58 198

17.20 12.81 24.59 18.52 16.67----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 30 31 7 6 39 113

12.00 8.45 5.74 5.56 11.21----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 23 20 6 14 11 74

9.20 5.45 4.92 12.96 3.16----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 71 121 31 48 66 337

28.40 32.97 25.41 44.44 18.97----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 20 45 11 6 45 127

8.00 12.26 9.02 5.56 12.93----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 367 122 108 348 1195

20.92 30.71 10.21 9.04 29.12========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

340

Page 342: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 34 65 153 94 346

17.44 20.83 33.19 41.59--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 35 56 68 37 196

17.95 17.95 14.75 16.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 32 36 29 16 113

16.41 11.54 6.29 7.08--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 16 19 28 12 75

8.21 6.09 6.07 5.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 29 89 160 59 337

14.87 28.53 34.71 26.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 49 47 23 8 127

25.13 15.06 4.99 3.54--------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 195 312 461 226 1194

16.33 26.13 38.61 18.93==========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

341

Page 343: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q28. John Cornyn Favorability

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 5 2 2 16 17 53 55 150

7.94 1.94 2.06 4.47 13.71 22.84 25.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 3 8 6 58 43 85 70 273

4.76 7.77 6.19 16.20 34.68 36.64 32.41--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

342

Page 344: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Neither favorable nor unfavora 3 12 13 84 24 40 27 2034.76 11.65 13.40 23.46 19.35 17.24 12.50

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 7 17 16 33 9 31 32 145

11.11 16.50 16.49 9.22 7.26 13.36 14.81--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 35 49 43 63 15 10 12 227

55.56 47.57 44.33 17.60 12.10 4.31 5.56--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 10 15 17 104 16 13 20 195

15.87 14.56 17.53 29.05 12.90 5.60 9.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 97 358 124 232 216 1193

5.28 8.63 8.13 30.01 10.39 19.45 18.11============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 9 16 125 150

3.42 4.47 21.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 17 58 197 272

6.46 16.20 34.56---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 28 84 90 202

10.65 23.46 15.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 40 33 72 145

15.21 9.22 12.63

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

343

Page 345: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 127 63 37 227

48.29 17.60 6.49---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 42 104 49 195

15.97 29.05 8.60---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 358 570 1191

22.08 30.06 47.86=================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 12 3 0 4 20 13 90 142

4.76 2.63 0.00 3.57 16.67 10.57 30.20------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 28 17 12 19 33 44 115 268

11.11 14.91 10.08 16.96 27.50 35.77 38.59------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 35 35 13 33 20 20 39 195

13.89 30.70 10.92 29.46 16.67 16.26 13.09------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 31 15 16 13 23 20 25 143

12.30 13.16 13.45 11.61 19.17 16.26 8.39------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 100 18 56 16 17 3 10 220

39.68 15.79 47.06 14.29 14.17 2.44 3.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 46 26 22 27 7 23 19 170

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

344

Page 346: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

18.25 22.81 18.49 24.11 5.83 18.70 6.38------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 252 114 119 112 120 123 298 1138

22.14 10.02 10.46 9.84 10.54 10.81 26.19============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 15 4 123 142

3.09 3.57 22.65-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 58 19 192 269

11.93 16.96 35.36-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 83 33 80 196

17.08 29.46 14.73-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 63 13 68 144

12.96 11.61 12.52-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 174 16 31 221

35.80 14.29 5.71-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 93 27 49 169

19.14 24.11 9.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 112 543 1141

42.59 9.82 47.59===================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

345

Page 347: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 68 13 42 29 152

28.33 2.89 15.79 12.24---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 75 50 96 50 271

31.25 11.11 36.09 21.10---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 44 72 40 46 202

18.33 16.00 15.04 19.41---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 10 67 54 15 146

4.17 14.89 20.30 6.33---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 5 177 25 20 227

2.08 39.33 9.40 8.44---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 38 71 9 77 195

15.83 15.78 3.38 32.49---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 450 266 237 1193

20.12 37.72 22.30 19.87===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

346

Page 348: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

======================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 5 58 41 15 20 14 153

12.20 16.48 12.54 13.39 8.16 12.28----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 11 75 74 30 54 28 272

26.83 21.31 22.63 26.79 22.04 24.56----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 2 72 57 15 45 10 201

4.88 20.45 17.43 13.39 18.37 8.77----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 7 23 38 17 42 18 145

17.07 6.53 11.62 15.18 17.14 15.79----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 6 42 58 21 62 36 225

14.63 11.93 17.74 18.75 25.31 31.58----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 10 82 59 14 22 8 195

24.39 23.30 18.04 12.50 8.98 7.02----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 327 112 245 114 1191

3.44 29.55 27.46 9.40 20.57 9.57======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

347

Page 349: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Very favorable 39 52 8 28 23 15020.86 19.55 6.06 9.96 7.08

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 49 69 42 63 48 271

26.20 25.94 31.82 22.42 14.77---------------------------------------------------------------------------