Belle View/New Alexandria/River Towers-Flood Risk Management Status Update
Current BG Status at Belle
description
Transcript of Current BG Status at Belle
![Page 1: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Current BG Status at Belle
Osamu Tajima
( Tohoku univ )
Assumption in this talk 100days-operation / yr 1nTorr CO pressure in simulation HER / LER = 1.1 / 1.6 A in simulation
![Page 2: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Contents
• Design concepts for BG reduction
• BG measurements
Radiation dose
Hit rate (SVD occupancy)
Layer (radius) dependence
• Comparison data and simulation
Support Super-KEKB / Belle design
• Ideas for Less BG
![Page 3: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
SVD Upgrade in 2003 summer
rbp = 2.0 cm 3 layers Rad. hardness
rbp = 1.5 cm 4 layers > 10 MRad (DSSD) > 20 MRad (reado
ut chip)
~ 1 MRad
Better vertex resolution / tracking efficiency
![Page 4: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
SVD Upgrade for Super-Belle
rbp = 1.5 cm
Super-Belle• Smaller rbp (1cm)• Higher beam current• Basic design is same as SVD2 beampipe
• We must understand Current Situation• Success of beampipe design is key-point
for Super-KEKB/Belle
![Page 5: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Beam-BG on Belle-SVD2
Synchrotron Radiation (SR)
Particle Background
Showers from scattered beam particles by Residual Gas or intra-beam scattering
Soft-SR (several keV)
Hard-SR ( keV ~ 150 keV)
Generated by upstream magnets
Backscattering from downstream
Brem. Coulomb Touschek
![Page 6: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Reduction of Particle-BG
Particle BG ~ 70 kRad/yr
![Page 7: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Reduction of Soft-SR
Au-coating !
crescent shapeSR-mask
some efforts
![Page 8: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Reduction of Soft-SR
Au-coating !
crescent shapeSR-mask
Au coating absorbs low energy photon less than 8 keV
![Page 9: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Reduction of Soft-SR
Au-coating !
crescent shapeSR-mask
Saw-tooth surface shape in Ta blind Soft-SR reflected on Ta
![Page 10: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Reduction of Soft-SR
Au-coating !
crescent shapeSR-mask (~2.5mm)
Crescent shape SR-mask blind Be section from Soft-SR
![Page 11: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Reduction of Soft-SR
Au-coating !
crescent shapeSR-mask
Soft-SR ~ few kRad/yr
![Page 12: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Reduction of Hard-SR
Scattered at downstream photon-stop (OC2RE chamber)
HER e-
High energy SRis generated inOCS magnet
•Put photon-stop far place (~9m)•Chamber material: Cu
Hard-SR ~ 29 kRad/yr
![Page 13: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Beam-BG on Belle-SVD2
Synchrotron Radiation (SR)
Particle Background
Showers from scattered beam particles by Residual Gas or intra-beam scattering
Soft-SR (several keV)
Hard-SR ( keV ~ 150 keV)
~ 70 kRad/yr @ 1st layer
few kRad/yr @ 1st layer
~ 29 kRad/yr
Generated by upstream magnets
Backscattering from downstream
Brem. Coulomb Touschek
![Page 14: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
BG measurement and Comparison with simulation
![Page 15: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
SR measurement w/ Single-Bunch HER 15 mA, with adjusting trigger timingCan measure dose w/ hit-rate (0.2 % occupancy) and energy deposition (15 keV/ch) ~20 kRad/yr dose @ 1.1 A (33 kRad/yr at max. position, =180deg) ( contribution below th. is corrected by simulation)
SVD 2.0 SVD 1.Xdatasimulation
![Page 16: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
SVD Cluster Energy Spectra in Single Beam Run
HER 0.8 A LER 1.5 A
Can extract SR from spectrum shape !?
Only Particle-BG
SR and Particle-BG
![Page 17: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
E-spectrum of HER Particle-BG
energy (keV)
#clu
ster
s/ke
V/e
vent • Diff. btw vacuum
bump on/off in HER• LER 1.5 A
HER E-spectrum of particle BG issame as LER !!
Can measure SRand particle-BG
separately
![Page 18: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Extraction SR in HER Single Beam
50 mA 100 mA 200 mA
400 mA 600 mA 800 mA
HERParticle
SR
Hard-SR simulation
![Page 19: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Correlation with Vacuum
Nparticle/NSR P(Pa) NSR I(A)Nparticle I(A) x P(Pa)
Average of HER whole ring
Average of HER upstream
![Page 20: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Azimuthal Distribution of SR
33 kRad/yrat HER 1.1A
21 kRad/yrat HER 1.1A
Only above threshold 10 keVSimulation complements below thereshold
simulation
29 kRad/yr
Single-Bunch 15 mA (trigger-timing is adjusted)Total 0.8 A w/ 1284 bunch (random timing)Hard-SR simulation
![Page 21: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Azimuthal Distribution of Particle BG
44 kRad/yrat HER 1.1A
43 kRad/yrat LER 1.6A
HER 0.8 A
LER 1.5 A
simulation
53 kRad/yr
simulation
21 kRad/yr
![Page 22: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Study of Touschek EffectTouschek contribution < 20 % at collision ~ 50 % at single beam 31 % in simulation
Smaller beam-size (larger density)
larger background
If no Touschek
Touschek contributionmust be corrected
Collision run
Single beam run
![Page 23: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Azimuthal Distribution of Particle BG
44 kRad/yrat HER 1.1A
43 kRad/yrat LER 1.6A
HER 0.8 A
LER 1.5 A
simulation
53 kRad/yr
simulation
21 kRad/yr
22
18
![Page 24: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Radiation Dose at SVD 1st layerAt Maximum Currents: HER 1.1A, LER 1.6A
Outer-direction
~ 0 degree
Inner-direction
~ 180 degree
Particle-BG (LER) 22 (18) kRad/yr 14 (11) kRad/yr
Particle-BG (HER) 44 (53) kRad/yr 29 (33) kRad/yr
SR-BG 17 (8) kRad/yr 33 (29) kRad/yr
Total 83 (79) kRad/yr 76 (73) kRad/yr
(…) is simulation @ 1nTorr pressure
Data and simulation is consistentTouschek contribution is reduced based on measurement
![Page 25: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Radiation Dose at SVD 1st layerAt Maximum Currents: HER 1.1A, LER 1.6A
Outer-direction
~ 0 degree
Inner-direction
~ 180 degree
Particle-BG (LER) 22 (18) kRad/yr 14 (11) kRad/yr
Particle-BG (HER) 44 (53) kRad/yr 29 (33) kRad/yr
SR-BG 17 (8) kRad/yr 33 (29) kRad/yr
Total 83 (79) kRad/yr 76 (73) kRad/yr
(…) is simulation @ 1nTorr pressure
Data and simulation is consistentTouschek contribution is reduced based on measurement
• Two parameters have large uncertainty (pressure, movable mask)• It may happen that absolute values too well agree• Consistency of azimuthal distribution is important
![Page 26: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Radiation Dose at SVD 1st layerAt Maximum Currents: HER 1.1A, LER 1.6A
Outer-direction
~ 0 degree
Inner-direction
~ 180 degree
Particle-BG (LER) 22 (18) kRad/yr 14 (11) kRad/yr
Particle-BG (HER) 44 (53) kRad/yr 29 (33) kRad/yr
SR-BG 17 (8) kRad/yr 33 (29) kRad/yr
Total 83 (79) kRad/yr 76 (73) kRad/yr
(…) is simulation @ 1nTorr pressure
Data and simulation is consistentTouschek contribution is reduced based on measurement• We can trust simulations
• Its uncertainty for abs. may be factor a few
![Page 27: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Constraint for Occupancy (hit-rate)
At Maximum Currents (HER 1.1A, LER 1.6A)
Outer-direction
~ 0 degree
Inner-direction
~ 180 degree
Particle-BG (LER) 3 % 2 %
Particle-BG (HER) 7 % 5 %
SR-BG 2 % 4 %
Total (single beam) 12 % 11 %
Radiation Dose Occupancy (cluster size: Particle-BG 3.5 ch, SR 1.5 ch)
Collision 12 % 11 %
![Page 28: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Energy spectra for each layers
LERsingle beam
1str ~ 2cm
2ndr ~ 4.4cm
3rdr ~ 7cm
4thr ~ 8.8cm
HERsingle beam
![Page 29: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Layer dependence (single beam)Particle (LER) Particle (HER) SR
BG 1/(r-rbp), rbp: beampipe radius
There may be correlation BG and 1/(r-rbp)
![Page 30: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Other sub-detectors
No large difference for BG (current diff. causes small diff. ?)
No problem
SVD 1.6
(Jun, 2003)
SVD 2.0
(Dec, 2003)
beampipe radius 2.0 cm 1.5 cm
HER/LER 1.0 / 1.5 A 1.1 / 1.6 A
CDC leak current 19 A 21 A
TOF rate 20 kHz 25 kHz
EFC rate 2.1 kHz 2.2 kHz
![Page 31: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Ideas for Less BG
• Improvement of vacuum HER: sensitive area is upstream (0~100 m) LER: sensitive area is whole ring• How about not-straight path ? HER upstream is almost straight path• Movable mask study
Particle-BG
1/2 Particle-BG ~ 2/3 total-BG/Occ.
• Put photon-stop far place Detail will be discussed in “Belle SR” talk
SR-BG (dominated by Hard-SR)
![Page 32: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Summary• Beampipe radius 2 1.5 cm ( 1 cm)
• Dose level is smaller (100 80 kRad/yr) Consistent with simulation
• Measure SR & Particle-BG separately using energy spectrum of SVD SR contribution ~1/3 of total
• Touschek is low < 20 % of LER-BG
• BG may decrease 1/(r-rbp)
Success of beampipe design Strong support for design in Super-B
Super-B
This method is first time in the world !?
![Page 33: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
####### backup #######
![Page 34: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Radiation Monitors
18 kRad/yr
80 kRad/yr60 kRad/yr
before 100 kRad/yr
Dose on Si is consistent with monitor
![Page 35: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Is monitors measuring SR ?
Be pipe
Outer-side of ring
Inner-side of ringThe 300 m Au on the manifold blinds SR-BG
Backscattered Hard-SR
BWD FWD
Most of SR photons are absorbed by Au, and converted to lower energy photons (8~14keV) via the photoelectric effect
e-
Difficulty to measure SRDose at DSSD center is same ?
Measure BGby DSSD itself
![Page 36: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Very Rough Estimation of Dose
We can measure dose using its energy deposition - Occupancy ~ 10 % - Energy Deposition ~ 46 keV/ch - Bunch cycle 10 usec - Shaping time 2.6~3.0 usec
~100 kRad/yr - No subtraction of electrical noise, bad-ch effect - Contribution below threshold (~15keV) is not considered - Need to consider below th. for SR (low energy should be dominated by SR)
Must measure for each components
![Page 37: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
SVD Hit Occupancy (hit-rate)
• 1st layer (R=2 cm) 10~12 % (HER 1.1A, LER 1.6A)
• Before (R=2.5 cm) 7 ~ 8 % (HER 1.0A, LER 1.5A)• 2nd layer (4.3 cm) ~ 4 %, 3rd, 4th layer ~ 2 %
![Page 38: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
SVD Occupancy (hit-rate)
SVD 1.6SVD 2.0
beampipe radius
Large diff. of occ. btw 1st – 2nd layersmay come from 1/(r-rbp) relation
![Page 39: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Single Bunch like RunHER 15 mA, with adjusting trigger timingSVD 1st layer occupancy ~ 0.2 % corresponds to ~ 4 % occupancy @ 1.1 AEnergy deposition 15.2 keV/ch corresponds to ~20 kRad/yr dose @ 1.1 A (33 kRad/yr at maximum position, =180deg) ( contribution below th. is corrected by simulation)
SVD 2.0 SVD 1.Xdatasimulation
![Page 40: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Correlation with Vacuum
Average Pressure
(Nparticle/NSR) / P(Pa) = const
Upstream Pressure
![Page 41: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Background at Collision
71 kRad/yr
11 kRad/yr
Total doseParticle-BGSR-BG
Run1560 (threshold ~15 keV) HER : 1.1 A, LER : 1.6 A
Consistent with expectation from single-beams
![Page 42: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Study of Touschek (life-time)
1.4A1.1A
Touschek contribution < 20 % at collision ~ 45 % at single beam 42 % in simulation
Smaller beam-size (density)
shorter life-time and larger background
If no Touschek
Single beam run
Touschek contributionmust be corrected
1/ beam-density
Collision run
![Page 43: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Layer dependence (collision run)Particle-BG SR-BG
BG 1/(r-rbp)
BG comes from beampipe radius ?
Large differenceof occupancy btw1st and 2nd layer
![Page 44: Current BG Status at Belle](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051218/568159a5550346895dc70001/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Is there reasonable reason to explain 1/(r-rbp) correlation?
Be pipe
SR is scattered / absorbed at Au coating
Backscattered Hard-SRe-
Spent particles are scattered thin-Ta region Large contribution comes from here (simulation)
Ta TaBe pipe