CPT Tool 3.2 gINT Add-In

datgel.com/cpt | [email protected]

Register for your FREE trial of CPT Tool 3.2

datgel.com/trial

Extend querying power with the most user-definable CPT software available.

More ways to interpret data

Rich-data presentation with more than 600 customisable log, fence, graph and cross section reports.

• User-defined correlation formulas

• Preconfigured soil parameters

• Soil behaviour type correlations

• Preconfigured liquefaction correlations

• Pile axial capacity and shallow foundation settlement

• Dissipation test analysis

• Seismic cone presentation

• Choose SI (Metric), USCS (English) or configure the units to suit your needs

• Begemann Mechanical CPT

• Magnetometer cone derivations and presentation

CPT Tool 3.2 is proven third-generation software that puts you in control with code-free report definition, formula creation tools and a library of preconfigured calculations unrivalled in cone penetration testing that can be written to the database for presentation in a range of customisable reporting formats.

Multi-format file import Import CPT data files from numerous formats and fast

import into SQL Server.

Data accuracy Adjust measured data after importation with data

correction tool.

High-volume data processing The power of multi-threaded calculation with support

for Access and SQL Server database formats.

Centralised data Storage Store all your CPT and dissipation test data securely in a

single database for longevity and straightforward reuse.

Define your own CPT reports extracting the right information every time across projects and sites.

CPT Tool 3.2 gINT Add-In

Formula Configuration1

2

3

4

5

6

7

89

10

2

3

4

5

6

7

89

100

2

3

4

5

6

7

89

1,000

0.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

2

3

4

5

6

7

8910

2

3

4

5

6

7

89100

2

3

4

5

6

7

891,000

0.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Qt

Fr

2

3

5

4

6

78

9

1

A4

DA

TGE

L C

PT

TOO

L D

GD

LIB

2.2

3.G

LB G

raph

CP

T R

OB

ER

TSO

N 9

0 Q

T V

S. F

R A

4P D

ATG

EL

CP

T TO

OL

DG

D 2

.23

SI.G

PJ

2012

-02-

21 S

BT.

GD

W 2

1/Fe

b/20

12 2

0:43

8.3

0.00

2 D

atge

l CP

T To

ol g

INT

Add

-In

FIGURE NoPROJECT No

SCALE

CHECKED DATE

DATEDRAWNTITLE

2.22

Not To Scale

21/02/2012

21/02/2012Client 1

Engineer 1Somewhere

CPT Tool ProjectRobertson 1990 Qt vs. Fr - CPT 02

METHOD: Robertson 19901 - Sensitive, fine grained

2 - Organic soil - peats

3 - Clays - clay to silty clay

4 - Silt mixtures - clayey silt to silty clay

5 - Sand mixtures - silty sand to sandy silt

6 - Sands - clean sand to silty sand

7 - Gravelly sand to sand

8 - Very stiff sand to clayey sand

9 - Very stiff fine grained

SBT graph

-7

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

30 10 20 30 40 50

PointID

CPT 00CPT 01CPT 02CPT 03CPT 04

Ele

vatio

n (m

)

Cone Resistance, qc (MPa) or Total Cone Resistance, qt (MPa)

A4

DA

TGEL

CPT

TO

OL

DG

D L

IB 2

.01.

GLB

Gra

ph C

PT

QC

QT

VS E

LEVA

TIO

N C

OLO

UR

DA

TGEL

CPT

TO

OL

DG

D 2

.01.

GPJ

<<D

raw

ingF

ile>>

Dat

gel C

PT

Tool

gIN

T Ad

d-In

27/

10/2

009

16:1

9

FIGURE NoPROJECT No

SCALE

CHECKED DATE

DATEDRAWNTITLE

123456

Not To Scale

27/10/2009

CB

DB

27/10/2009CPT ClientSomewhere

CPT Tool ProjectCone Resistance versus Elevation

1

CPT QC QT VS ELEVATION Colour Graph Report

Import FormatsThe Datgel CPT Tool natively supports a range of common CPT data file formats. Where applicable the CPT Tool also imports dissipation test data.

Users can customise the gINT import correspondence files to control which field and table data imports to.

Choose to import 1 file, multiple files or a folder of files.

Datgel Import Engine imports data into an SQL Server database in seconds instead of minutes to hours with gINT.

Supported import file formats include:

• Access• AGS 3.1, AGS 3.1 RTA 1.1 and AGS4• A.P. van den Berg Gorilla!• ConeTec (COR)• Datem Neptune (CDF)• Douglas Partners• GEF 1.1.0 and 1.0.0• Geo-Explorer (CSV) and V2• Geomil PlotCPT• gINT Excel• gINT CSV• Gregg Drilling (COR)• Hogentogler (CPD) • Pagani (CPT, DAT, CPTU-ACQ, TGSA08)• ProbeDrill• Simple Delimited Depth qc fs u• Swedish Geotechnical Data

Format (SGF) • Vertek (ECP)

Soil Behaviour Type The CPT Tool is supplied with seven soil behaviour type (SBT) interpretation methods:

• Begemann (1965)• Eslami and Fellenius (1997)• Ramsey (2002)• Robertson (1990)• Robertson, Campanella, Gillespie

and Greig (1986) • Schmertmann (1978)• Schneider, Randolph, Mayne and

Ramsey (2008)

Additional methods may be defined by users and stored in the library or project file - for site specific correlations.

The SBT can be summarised onto your existing borehole description lithology/stratigraphy table.

Your existing material graphic code can be associated with each SBT number, geotechnically insignificant layers may be excluded, and thin layers of the same type (fine/coarse) can be appended together.

Soil Behaviour Type Index

• Been and Jefferies (1992)• Jefferies and Davies (1993)• Robertson and Wride (1998)• Robertson (2010)

General features• Multi threaded calculation• Support for gINT Access and SQL

Server database formats• Filtering of rod changes• Depth correction due to inclination • User definable units allowing for

SI (Metric) and USCS (English) unit systems

• Design line• Options for Friction Ratio calculation• Mechanical cone derivations• CPT Compaction Boxes

Derived Parameters• Corrected sleeve friction, ft • Corrected total cone resistance, qt• Differential pore pressure

ratio, DPPR • Dimensionless penetration

resistance, Qt(1-Bq)+1• Effective cone resistance, qe• Excess pore pressure, Δu• Friction ratio, Rf • In situ effective vertical stress, σvo’• In situ total vertical stress, σvo • Net cone resistance, qn • Normalised cone resistance, Qt • Normalised excess pore pressure• Normalised friction ratio, Fr • Penetration Rate • Pore pressure ratio, Bq • Stress Normalised Cone

Resistance, qt1

-7

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

30 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

PointID

CPT 00CPT 01CPT 02

Method: Baldi et al. (1986) and Al-Homoud and Wehr (2006) Jamiolkowski et al. (2001) Kulhawy and Mayne (1990)

Relative Density, Dr (%)

Ele

vatio

n (m

, AH

D)

A4

DA

TGE

L C

PT

TOO

L D

GD

LIB

2.0

5.G

LB G

raph

CP

T D

R R

L D

ATG

EL

CP

T TO

OL

DG

D 2

.05.

GP

J <<

Dra

win

gFile

>> 0

4/M

ay/2

010

21:5

4 8.

2.00

8 D

atge

l CP

T To

ol g

INT

Add

-In

FIGURE NoPROJECT No

SCALE

CHECKED DATE

DATEDRAWNTITLE

2.04

Not To Scale

4/05/2010

PMW

PMW

4/05/2010CPT ClientSomewhere

CPT Tool ProjectRelative Density versus Elevation

CPT Dr Depth graph with 3 correlations

1.25 2.50 3.750 5FRICTION RATIO, Rf (%)

2 4 60 8

SLEEVE FRICTION, fs (kPa)

125 250 3750 500

CONE RESISTENCE, qc (MPa)12.5 25.0 37.50 50

Hole ID

SHEET : 1 OF 1STATUS : 1DATE : 11/12/08

CPT 01

CHECKED BY : B. SmithCHECKED DATE : 02/06/2009APPROVED BY : C. DoeAPPROVED DATE : 02/06/2009

REMARKA general remark.

RIG : Crawler 1no anchoringCONE TYPE : C+F+W2CONE ID : S15CFIIP.D76OPERATOR : Operator A

CLIENT : CPT ClientENGINEER : CPT EngineerPROJECT : CPT Tool ProjectLOCATION : Somewhere WorldPROJECT No. : ABC

CPT LOG

AREA : Area 1EASTING : 247985.8 mNORTHING : 1267342.9 mCOORD. SYS.: MGA94 56ELEVATION : 10.23 m AHD

Dep

th (m

)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Ele

vatio

n(m

AH

D)

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

DA

TGEL

_CP

T_TO

OL_

DG

D_L

IB_0

9.G

LB L

og C

PT

DA

TGEL

_CP

T_TO

OL_

DG

D_0

9.G

PJ <

<Dra

win

gFile

>> D

atge

l CP

T To

ol g

INT

Add-

In 2

0/03

/200

9 18

:12

Design Line

CPT Measured Parameters

ELE

VA

TIO

N(m

AH

D)

0

-2

-4

-6

-8

-10

-12

Design Line

ELE

VA

TIO

N(m

AH

D)

0

-2

-4

-6

-8

-10

-12

DE

PTH

(m)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

DE

PTH

(m)

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

1 - Sensitive, fine grained







9 - Very stiff fine grained6 - Sands - clean sand to silty sand

METHOD: Robertson 1990

0 1.5 3 4.5 6

Friction Ratio, Rf (%)Corrected Cone Resistance, qt (MPa)

0 10 20 30 40

PointID 1SHEET: 1 OF 1

CLIENT : CPT ClientENGINEER : ABC EngineeringPROJECT : CPT Tool ProjectLOCATION : SomewherePROJECT No. : 2.10

COMPARISON CPT LOGPointID 2

CPT 05STATUS : 2DATE : 23/12/09AREA : PlaceLAYER :EASTING : 248139.6 mNORTHING : 1267426.3 mELEVATION : 1.51 m AHD

CPT 04STATUS :DATE : 12/11/08AREA : PlaceLAYER :EASTING : 248114.9 mNORTHING : 1267400.2 mELEVATION : 1.20 m AHD

DA

TGEL

CPT

TO

OL

DG

D L

IB 2

.10.

GLB

Log

CP

TU C

OM

PAR

ISO

N A

4 D

ATG

EL C

PT T

OO

L D

GD

2.1

0.G

PJ <

<Dra

win

gFile

>> 2

1/Se

p/20

10 2

3:52

8.2

.824

Dat

gel C

PT

Tool

gIN

T Ad

d-In

SOIL BEHAVIOUR TYPE:Robertson 1990 Extrapolated

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

qt Strata Average

qt Moving Average Over 0.5 mqt Stepped Average Over 1 m

Comparison Log Report

CPT LogsA range of sophisticated log reports are included. All reports include options to:

• Control plot scales in numerous ways; either set minimum and maximum values, or have the Tool automatically find the maximum value in a PointID or Project and round up to the nearest number e.g. 5 or 10

• Easily define line and data marker types, colours and thickness from INPUT

• Control number of major divisions on log plots

• Display of design lines• Display lines across the log identifying sea

water level, seabed level, natural/original level below a reclamation

• Control number of metres per page• Display qc or qt moving average, stepped

average, and strata average

Dynamic Log Reports for Analysis

• A4, A3, Letter and 11x17 paper sizes• At output time, select up to 10 columns to

display on the logs, and optionally define the column widths

Comparison Logs for Ground Improvement

• Display two CPT PointIDs on one log report with data related by elevation

• Applicable to ground improvement and reclamation projects

Fixed Log Reports for Mass Production

• A4, A3, Letter and 11x17 paper sizes

Undrained Shear Strength Method:1. su = (qt·103 - vo)/Nkt; or (qc·103 - vo)/Nk2. su = (qt·103)/Nkt; or (qc·103)/Nk3. Wroth (1984)4. Trak et al. (1980), Terzaghi et al. (1996)

Overconsolidation Ratio Method:1. Mayne (1995); Demers & Leroueil (2002)2. Chen & Mayne (1996)3. Mayne (2005)4. Robertson (2009)5. Mayne (2005)6. Mayne (2007)

Relative Density Method:1. Baldi et al. (1986); Al-Homoud & Wehr (2006)2. Jamiolkowski et al. (2001)3. Kulhawy & Mayne (1990)

CPT 05

CPT LOG


AREA : PlaceEASTING : 248139.6 mNORTHING : 1267426.3 mCOORD. SYS. : MGA94 56ELEVATION : 1.51 m AHD

CLIENT : CPT ClientENGINEER : ABC EngineeringPROJECT : CPT Tool ProjectLOCATION : SomewherePROJECT No. : 2.10

A general remark.REMARKRIG : no anchoring

CONE TYPE : C+F+W2CONE ID : S15CFIIP.D76OPERATOR : Operator A

CHECKED BY : B. SmithCHECKED DATE : 06/02/2009APPROVED BY : C. DoeAPPROVED DATE : 06/02/2009

PointID

DA

TGEL

CPT

TO

OL

DG

D L

IB 2

.10.

GLB

Log

CP

T D

YN

AMIC

A3L

DAT

GEL

CPT

TO

OL

DG

D 2

.10.

GPJ

<<D

raw

ingF

ile>>

21/

Sep/

2010

23:

34 8

.2.8

24 D

atge

l CP

T To

ol g

INT

Add-

In

DissipationTest

Design Line

1 - Sensitive, fine grained







9 - Very stiff fine grained6 - Sands - clean sand to silty sand

METHOD: Robertson 1990qt Moving Average Over 0.5 mqt Stepped Average Over 1 mqt Strata Average

-300 9000 300 600

In Situ Pore Pressure, u0 (kPa)

Porewater Pressure, u2 (kPa)5

3

4

2

6

25 50 750 100

Overconsolidation Ratio, OCR

1 1

4

32

40 80 120 1600 200

Undrained Shear Strength, su (kPa)

25 50 750 100

Relative Density, Dr (%)

1 32

-0.6 -0.1 0.4 0.9 1.4

Pore Pressure Ratio, Bq

0 1.5 3 4.5 6

Friction Ratio, Rf (%)0 10 20 30

1 2 30

0 400Sleeve Friction Resistance, fs (kPa)

4

100 200 300

40Corrected Cone Resistance, qt (MPa)

0 6

Slope Indicator (°)

1.5 3 4.5Friction Ratio, Rf (%)

20 -513.75 7.5 1.25

Normalised Cone Resistance, Qt(MPa)

100001 10 100 1000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9


ELE

VA

TIO

N(m

AH

D)

0

-2

-4

-6

-8

-10

-12

DE

PTH

(m)

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Dynamic Log Report

CorrelationsUser Definable Correlation Formulas

The Datgel Formula Tool is the first way for a user to write a formula in gINT Input without writing complex VBA code. Simply define the referenced fields, and write your correlation formula in a standard formula syntax.

• Reference any related field in the database• Built in mathematical and statistical functions• Define result format, i.e. decimal

places or significant figures• Results may be numbers or text• Store your common formulas in the library,

and project specific formulas in the project• Data averages• Data extrapolations

Liquefaction Assessment

Primary references:• Idriss & Boulanger (2008 and 2014)• Jefferies & Been (2006)• Robertson & Wride (1998) / NCEER• Kayen et al. (2013)

Preconfigured correlations:• Clean-Sand Equivalent Normalised Cone

Resistance• Cyclic Resistance Ratio, CRR• Cyclic Stress Ratio, CSR• Factor of Safety, FS• Residual Shear Strength, Sr• Maximum Shear Strain• Lateral Displacement, LD• Post Liquefaction Volumetric Strain• Post Liquefaction Reconsolidation Settlement, S• Liquefaction Potential Index• Liquefaction Severity Number

Foundation Design

• Pile capacity to Bustamante and Gianselli / LCPC (1982)

• Shallow foundation settlement to Schmertmann (1978)

Preconfigured correlations

• Angle of friction, φ’• Coefficient of lateral earth

pressure, K0• Coefficient of Volume Change, mv• Compression Index, Cc• Constrained Modulus, M• Effective cohesion, c’• Extrapolated shear wave velocity, Vs• Fines content , FC• Hydraulic conductivity

(permeability), K• Overconsolidation ratio, OCR• Preconsolidation stress, σp’• qc and qt moving average,

stepped average and strata average

• Relative Density Index, Dr• Rigidity index, Ir• Sensitivity, St• Shear wave velocity, Vs• Small strain shear modulus, G0• Soil behaviour type Index, Ic• SPT N60 and stepped average • State Parameter• Undrained Shear Strength, su• Unit Weight, γ• Young’s modulus, E

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

Por

e pr

essu

re, u

(kP

a)

Nom

alis

ed E

xces

s Po

re P

ress

ure,

U

ui

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

Square Root Time, t1/2 (min1/2)

u at U = 50%

t50

u0

AREA : Sydney 19-05-08EASTING : 248189.7 mNORTHING : 1267403.9 mCOORD. SYS.: MGA94 56ELEVATION : 3.10 m AHD

Test ID

DISSIPATION TEST

V-Diss test NC - 14.63 mCLIENT : CPT ClientENGINEER :PROJECT : CPT Tool ProjectLOCATION : SomewherePROJECT No. : 123456

REMARKRIG : TRACK RIGCONE TYPE :CONE ID : EC17OPERATOR :

ANALYSED BY : DATE:CHECKED BY : DATE:APPROVED BY : DATE:

Horizontal Coefficent of Consolidation, ch: 1.50x103 m2/yrRatio ch/cv: 3Vertical Coefficent of Consolidation, cv: 4.99x102 m2/yr

SHEET : 1 OF 1STATUS :DATE :

In Situ Pore Pressure, u0: 128.76 kPaInitial Pore Pressure, ui: 579.6 kPaFinial Pore Pressure: 579.640255 kPaDegree of Dissipation: 50 %Dissipation Pressure: 354.06 kPaTime for 50% Dissipation, t50: 0.34 min

DA

TGEL

CPT

TO

OL

DG

D L

IB 2

.01.

GLB

Gra

ph C

PT

DIS

S. P

OR

E P

RE

SSU

RE

VS. S

QR

T D

ATG

EL C

PT T

OO

L D

GD

2.0

1.G

PJ <

<Dra

win

gFile

>> D

atge

l CP

T To

ol g

INT

Add-

In 2

7/10

/200

9 16

:24

Normally Consolidated Test

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

240

260

280

300

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

uc

Por

e pr

essu

re, u

(kP

a)

Nom

alis

ed E

xces

s Po

re P

ress

ure,

U

ui

-0.1

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

Square Root Time, t1/2 (min1/2)

u at U = 50%

t50

u0

AREA :EASTING :NORTHING :COORD. SYS.: MGA94 56ELEVATION :

Test ID

DISSIPATION TEST

V-Diss test OC - 7.49 mCLIENT : CPT ClientENGINEER :PROJECT : CPT Tool ProjectLOCATION : SomewherePROJECT No. : 123456

REMARKRIG :CONE TYPE :CONE ID : 3167OPERATOR : PMW

adsf; varANALYSED BY : ABC DATE: 02/01/2009CHECKED BY : DEF DATE: 03/01/2009APPROVED BY : GHI DATE: 04/01/2009

Horizontal Coefficent of Consolidation, ch: 2.68x100 m2/yrRatio ch/cv: 5Vertical Coefficent of Consolidation, cv: 5.36x10-1 m2/yr


In Situ Pore Pressure, u0: 73.48 kPaInitial Pore Pressure, ui: 240 kPaFinial Pore Pressure: 261 kPaBack Extrapolated Pore Pressure, uc: 277 kPaDegree of Dissipation: 50 %Dissipation Pressure: 175.2 kPaTime for 50% Dissipation, t50: 43.27 min

DA

TGEL

CPT

TO

OL

DG

D L

IB 2

.01.

GLB

Gra

ph C

PT

DIS

S. P

OR

E P

RE

SSU

RE

VS. S

QR

T D

ATG

EL C

PT T

OO

L D

GD

2.0

1.G

PJ <

<Dra

win

gFile

>> D

atge

l CP

T To

ol g

INT

Add-

In 2

7/10

/200

9 16

:12

Overconsolidated Test with Back Extrapolation

-11

-10

-9

-8

-7

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380

(3 m) 0

qt (MPa)4010 20 300300

su (kPa)

100200

Sof

tFi

rmStif

f

Ver

y S

tiff

Ver

y S

oft

Har

d

1 2 34 5

06

Rf (%)1.534.5 0

Dr (%)

10025 50 75

Ver

y D

ense

Ver

y D

ense

Den

se

Med

ium

Den

se

Loos

e

Ver

y Lo

ose

1 2 3

(1 m) 0

qt (MPa)4010 20 300300

su (kPa)

100200

Sof

tFi

rmStif

f

Ver

y S

tiff

Ver

y S

oft

Har

d

24 5

06

Rf (%)1.534.5 0

Dr (%)

10025 50 75

Ver

y D

ense

Ver

y D

ense

Den

se

Med

ium

Den

se

Loos

e

Ver

y Lo

ose

1 2 3

(2 m) 0

qt (MPa)4010 20 300300

su (kPa)

100200

Sof

tFi

rmStif

f

Ver

y S

tiff

Ver

y S

oft

Har

d

1 2 34 5

06

Rf (%)1.534.5 0

Dr (%)

10025 50 75

Ver

y D

ense

Ver

y D

ense

Den

se

Med

ium

Den

se

Loos

e

Ver

y Lo

ose

1 2 3

(2 m) 0

qt (MPa)4010 20 300300

su (kPa)

100200

Sof

tFi

rmStif

f

Ver

y S

tiff

Ver

y S

oft

Har

d

1 2 34 5

06

Rf (%)1.534.5 0

Dr (%)

10025 50 75

Ver

y D

ense

Ver

y D

ense

Den

se

Med

ium

Den

se

Loos

eV

ery

Loos

e

1 2 3(-2 m)0

qt (MPa)4010 20 300300

su (kPa)

100200

Sof

tFi

rmStif

f

Ver

y S

tiff

Ver

y S

oft

Har

d

1 2 34 5

06

Rf (%)1.534.5 0

Dr (%)

10025 50 75

Ver

y D

ense

Ver

y D

ense

Den

se

Med

ium

Den

se

Loos

e

Ver

y Lo

ose

1 2 3

Relative Density Method:1. Baldi et al. (1986); Al-Homoud & Wehr (2006)2. Jamiolkowski et al. (2001)3. Kulhawy & Mayne (1990)

Undrained Shear Strength Method:1. su = (qt - vo)/Nkt; or (qc - vo)/Nk2. su = qt/Nkt; or qc/Nk3. Wroth (1984)4. Trak et al. (1980), Terzaghi et al. (1996)5. Robertson (2009), su = u/N

714.505

DH2

111.121

121.137

130.881

140.822

150.850

160.639

170.694

180.415

190.539

200.043

190.832

200.884

210.934

220.805225

250

275

300

325 350

375

SP

SM

CH

OH

ELE

VA

TIO

N (m

MS

L)

MAP KEY Borehole Cone penetration test

A3

DA

TGE

L C

PT

TOO

L D

GD

LIB

2.2

3.G

LB F

ence

CP

T FE

NC

E A

3L D

ATG

EL

CP

T TO

OL

DG

D 2

.23

SI.G

PJ

<<D

raw

ingF

ile>>

21/

Feb/

2012

20:

40 8

.30.

002

Dat

gel C

PT

Tool

gIN

T A

dd-In

FIGURE NoPROJECT No

SCALE

CHECKED DATE

DATEDRAWNTITLE

2.22

H 1:507 V 1:140

1/01/2012PMW

21/02/2012Client 1

Engineer 1Somewhere

CPT Tool ProjectInferred Subsurface Section

METHOD: Robertson 19904 - Silt mixtures - clayeysilt to silty clay

5 - Sand mixtures - siltysand to sandy silt

1 - Sensitive, finegrained


3 - Clays - clay to siltyclay

6 - Sands - clean sandto silty sand

7 - Gravelly sand tosand

8 - Very stiff sand toclayey sand

9 - Very stiff fine grained

CP

T 01

CP

T 02

CP

T 03

CP

T 04

CP

T 05

2480

00E

2480

00E

2480

25E

2480

25E

2480

50E

2480

50E

2480

75E

2480

75E

2481

00E

2481

00E

2481

25E

2481

25E

2481

50E

2481

50E

1267325N

1267325N

1267350N

1267350N

1267375N

1267375N

1267400N

1267400N

1267425N

1267425N

1267450N

1267450N

CPT 01A

CPT 05 SchneiderCPT TEST 02CPT TEST 03

CPT TEST 04

CPT TEST 05CPT TEST 06V-CPTU BUW u0 TS Profile

CPT 01

CPT 02CPT 03

CPT 04

CPT 05

Fence Diagram

datgel.com/cpt | [email protected]

Register for your FREE trial of CPT Tool 3.2

datgel.com/trial

Data Correction Tool

Data Correction ToolAllows for one-off corrections of data

Example applications:• Offset one parameter a fixed depth, e.g. offset sleeve

friction for many tests in one process• Re-zero the depth if 0 depth is not the ground surface• Apply calibrations to a parameter defined by a formula• Correct depth for inclination

Dissipation TestDissipation tests may be analysed using the strain path method (SPM) proposed by Houlsby and Teh 1988.

Dissipation tests carried out in overconsolidated soils maybe corrected using the square root time method, as proposed in Sully et al. 1999, and short tests may be extrapolated forward to estimate tx, (e.g. t50).

Reports can show qc graph below u graph.

Fence Diagram/Cross SectionDynamic user-definable fence or cross section reports:

• Choose up to 6 parameters and correlations to display, e.g. qc, qt, Rf, Ic plots

• Soil behaviour type coloured column• Material graphic column• Legend for soil behaviour type • Legend for material graphic • A4, A3, Letter and 11x17 paper sizes

Additional Sensors and Instruments • Ball Penetrometer Test presentation• Magnetometer presentation• Seismic cone presentation

2017-09

CPT Tool 3.2 gINT Add-In

Documents

Transcript of CPT Tool 3.2 gINT Add-In