cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises ...

8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf

1/77

Ir K T LEUNGBEng(Hons),GDAS, MSc, RPE(FRE), CEng, CEnv, CSHP FIFireE, MHKIE,

FEI, MCIBSE, MIGEM, MCIPHE, CMIOSH, RSO, RSA

•Email : [email protected] or [email protected]

•Phone : 9520 3484

TECHNICAL SEMINAR

ON

SOLUTIONS TO REVISED FIRE SEPARATION

REQUIREMENTS FOR EXISTING COMMERCIAL

PREMISES / BUILDINGS UNDER CHAPTER 502 FIRE

SAFETY (COMMERCIAL PREMISES) ORDINANCE AND

CHAPTER 572 FIRE SAFETY (BUILDINGS) ORDINANCE


2/77

NEW FIRE SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS FOR

COMMERCIAL PREMISES

SECTION C – FIRE RESISTING

CONSTRUCTION


3/77

NEW FIRE SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS FOR

COMMERCIAL PREMISES


4/77

NEW FIRE SAFETY CODES IN HONG KONG

SECTION C – FIRE RESISTINGCONSTRUCTION

SECTION E – FIRE

PROPERTIES OF BUILDING

ELEMENTS AND

COMPONENTS


5/77

MAJOR CHALLENGE IN

NEW FIRE SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS

INSULATION CRITERIA FOR FIRE SEPARATION

APPLIED TO EXISTING COMMERCIAL

PREMISES UNDER CHAPTER 572 LAWS OF

HONG KONG BY AMENDMENT OF FRC 1996

THROUGH PNAP APP-83


6/77

WHY INSULATION CRITERION OF

FIRE RESISTING CONSTRUCTIONIS SO IMPORTANT TO US ???

http://20150912%20insulation%20fire%20spearation%20veido.mp4/http://20150912%20insulation%20fire%20spearation%20veido.mp4/http://20150912%20insulation%20fire%20spearation%20veido.mp4/http://20150912%20insulation%20fire%20spearation%20veido.mp4/http://20150912%20insulation%20fire%20spearation%20veido.mp4/http://20150912%20insulation%20fire%20spearation%20veido.mp4/


7/77

PNAP, APP-83 - AMENDMENT TO PAGE 10

PARAGRAPH 10.6 OF FRC 1996

OPENINGS MAY BE MADE IN

COMPARTMENT WALLS FOR

COMMUNICATION, BUT NOT COMBINATION,OF ADJOINING COMPARTMENTS, PROVIDED

THAT ANY SUCH OPENING IS PROTECTED BY

A DOOR OR A FIRE SHUTTER WITH FRP AS

STIPULATED BELOW:


8/77



a) IF THE TOTAL WIDTH OF THE OPENINGS

IS NOT MORE THAN 25% OF THE LENGTH

OF THE COMPARTMENT WALLSCONCERNED, THE DOOR OR FIRE

SHUTTER SHOULD HAVE THE SAME FRP

AS SUCH COMPARTMENT WALLS WITH

REGARD TO THE CRITERION OFINTEGRITY ONLY; AND


9/77



b) IF THE TOTAL WIDTH OF THE OPENINGS IS MORETHAN 25% OF THE LENGTH OF THE COMPARTMENT

WALLS CONCERNED, THE DOOR OR FIRE SHUTTER

SHOULD HAVE THE SAME FRP AS SUCH

COMPARTMENT WALLS WITH REGARD TO THECRITERIA OF INTEGRITY AND INSULATION. SUCHFRP WITH REGARD TO THE CRITERION OF

INSULATION CAN BE REDUCED TO 30 MINUTES IF

ADDITIONAL SPRINKLER HEADS ARE PROVIDEDON EACH SIDE OF THE DOORS OR FIRE SHUTTERS

AND COMPLYING WITH THE FOLLOWING

REQUIREMENTS:


10/77



1) THE ADDITIONAL SPRINKLER HEADS

SHOULD BE A PART OF THE SPRINKLER

SYSTEM OF THE BUILDING AND SHOULDCOMPLY WITH THE CODE OF PRACTICEFOR MINIMUM FIRE SERVICE

INSTALLATIONS AND EQUIPMENT; AND


11/77



2) THE LAYOUT/ARRAY OF THE ADDITIONAL

SPRINKLER HEADS SHOULD BE PROVIDED TO

SUBSTANTIATE THE FULL COVERAGE OF

EACH SIDE OF THE DOOR OR FIRE

SHUTTER BY SPRINKLERS AND THESPACING OF SPRINKLER HEADS SHOULD

ALSO COMPLY WITH THE LPC RULES

INCORPORATING BS EN 12845:2003.”


12/77



THIS PARAGRAPH IS APPLICABLE TO BUILDINGS ORBUILDING WORKS WITH CONSENT TO THE

COMMENCEMENT OF WHICH OBTAINED ON OR

AFTER 18 AUGUST 2011 (THE DATE ON WHICH THE

LAST REVISION OF THIS PRACTICE NOTE WASISSUED). FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBT, IN

RESPECT OF NEW BUILDINGS, THE RELEVANT

CONSENT REFERS TO THE CONSENT TO THE

COMMENCEMENT OF FOUNDATION WORKS OFSUCH BUILDINGS; AND IN RESPECT OF ALTERATIONS

AND ADDITIONS WORKS, THE RELEVANT CONSENT

REFERS TO THE CONSENT TO THE COMMENCEMENT

OF SUCH WORKS.


13/77

SHOULD SPRINKLER BE USED

FOR SUPPLEMENT THE FRR OF

FIRE SHUTTERS ?

CAN FIRE SAFETY

REQUIREMENTS FOR FIRE

COMPARTMENTATION BE

LIFTED UP FOR SPRINKLERPROTECTED BUILDINGS ?

CONTROVERSAL ISSUES ON

SPRINKLER PROTECTED FIRE SHUTTER ?

?

?


14/77

NEITHER LPC RULES NOR BS EN 12845:2003 COVER ANY SPECIFICATIONS OF SPRINKLER PROTECTION FORFIRE SHUTTER

NO APPROVED / LISTED PRODUCTS FOR SHUTTERWETTING SPRINKLER IS AVAILABLE IN THE MARKET

NO FIRE TEST HAS BEEN CONDUCTED TO PROVE THE FRRPERFORMANCE OF SPRINKLER PROTECTED FIRE SHUTTER

NO SPECIFICATION ON PHYSICAL BREAKDOWNRESISTANCE OF SHUTTER MATERIAL UNDER WATERACTION OF SPRINKLER OPERATIONS

CRITICAL CONCERNS ON

SPRINKLER PROTECTED FIRE SHUTTER


15/77

BD EMAIL ON 11TH JUNE 2015

CLARIFIED THAT IT WAS

BEYOND THE JURISDICTION OFBD. FSD SHOULD BE

CONSULTED ON THE

REQUIREMENTS ON

SPRINKLER SYSTEM OF A

BUILDING

BD CLARIFICATION ON

SPRINKLER DESIGN FOR

FIRE SHUTTER PROTECTION?

?

?


16/77

SDO (NEW PROJECT) CHAN

KAM FAI OF FSD CLEARLY

EXPRESSED HIS SERIOUS

CONCERN ON SUCHREQUIREMENTS ANDINDICATED THAT HE DID NOT

SUPPORT THIS APPROACH

AND WOULD NOT CARRY OUT

INSPECTION TO SUCHINSTALLATION DURING AN

HKIE SEMINAR IN 2014

CONTROVERSAL ISSUES ON

SPRINKLER PROTECTED FIRE SHUTTER ?

?

?


17/77

CLOSED TYPE SPRINKLER HEADS CANNOT PROVIDE FULL

COVERAGE ON EACH SIDE ; OPERATED ONE BY ONE ONLY

SPACING OF CONVENTIONAL SPRINKLER FOR HORIZONTALPLANE DESIGN NOT FOR VERTICAL PLANE DESIGN

STANDARD 60 MINUTES WATER SUPPLIES INADEQUATE

FOR PROTECTION OF FIRE SHUTTER WITH 120 OR 240

MINUTES FRR

DEFICIENCIES OF SHARING FIRE SUPPRESSION

SPRINKLER SYSTEM FOR FIRE SHUTTER

PROTECTION


18/77

ADDITIONAL SPRINKLERS OPERATION FOR FIRE SHUTTER

PROTECTION COULD EXCEED THE ASSUMED MAXIMUM

AREA OF OPERATION AS PER LPC RULES AND BS EN

12845:2003 EXCESSIVE SPRINKLER OPERATION COULD REDUCE THE

SYSTEM FLOW AND PRESSURE AND ADVERSELY AFFECT THE

PERFORMANCE FOR FIRE SUPPRESSION; THE ORIGINAL

PURPOSE OF SPRINKLER SYSTEM EXCESSIVE SPRINKLER OPERATION COULD SIGNIFICANTY

REDUCE THE DURATION OF WATER SUPPLIES TO LESS THAN

30 MINUTES

DEFICIENCIES OF SHARING FIRE SUPPRESSION

SPRINKLER SYSTEM FOR FIRE SHUTTER

PROTECTION


19/77

TYPE OF SPRINKLER

HEADS TO BE USED ?

CLOSED HEAD, OR

OPEN HEAD, OR

DRENCHER HEAD

UNCERTAINTIES OF CODE REQUIREMENTS


20/77

PATTERN OF SPRINKLER

HEADS TO BE USED ?

CONVENTIONAL , OR

SPRAY NOZZLE, OR

WALL WETTING, OR DRENCHER



21/77

TYPE OF SPRINKLER

CONTROL TO BE USED ? SHARE SAME

CONTROL VALVE, OR

INDEPENDENT

CONTROL VALVE

NORMAL ALARM

VALVE, OR

DELUGE VALVE, OR

MULTIPLE JET

CONTROL



22/77

OPERATION MODE OFSPRINKLER SYSTEM ?

HEAD BY HEAD, OR

SHUTTER BYSHUTTER ON BOTH

SIDES,



23/77

DESIGNED DENSITY OF

COVERAGE OF FIRE

SHUTTER?

DESIGNED FLOW AND

PRESSURE?



24/77

DESIGNED WATER SUPPLIES FOR

SPRINKLER SYSTEM? SHARED WITH FIRE

SUPPRESSION SYSTEM WHICH

IS ORGINALLY LIMITED FOR 40

TO 60 MINUTES ONLY, OR

PROVIDE ADDITIONAL WATER

SUPPLIES WITH SAME

DURATION OF FRR OF FIRE

SHUTTER AND FULLY CATER

FOR THE REQUIRED

OPERATION MODE



25/77

LIMITATION ON APPLICATION?

ALL TYPE OF HAZARDGROUP ?

HOW ABOUT HIGH

HAZARD?

UNLIMITED SIZE OF FIRESHUTTER?

UNLIMITED HEIGHT OF

FIRE SHUTTER?



26/77

CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR FIRE RATEDPERFORMANCE?

SEPARATE CERTIFICATION FOR SHUTTER WETTING

SPRINKLER AND FIRE SHUTTER OR

FULL CERTIFICATION FOR COMBINED SPRINKLER

PROTECTED FIRE SHUTTER



27/77

DRENCHER IS A LONG ESTABLISHED PRACTICE

ACCEPTED BY FSD AS AN ALTERNATIVE FOR FIRE

SEPARTION

THE ONLY GUIDELINES ARE SHOWED IN FSD CIRCULAR

4/96 PART VIII SECTION 5 DATED 22 OCTOBER 1996

WATER SUPPLIES DURATION OF NOT LESS THAN 30MINUTES

DISCHARGE DENSITY = 10 l / m2 / min HOWEVER, NO AMENDMENT OR UPDATES TO COVER

SPRINKLER PROTECTION FOR FIRE SHUTTER

FSD REQUIREMENTS FOR DRENCHER SYSTEM

RISK PERCEPTION ON FAILURE OF


28/77


PASSIVE FIRE PROTECTION

RISK OF FAILUREFIRE RATED

WALL

FIRE

SHUTTER

SPRINKLER PROECTED

SHUTTERLOSS INTEGRITY 1 1 1

BLOCKAGE OF SHUTTER 0 1 1

LOSS OF MOTOR OF SHUTTER 0 1 1

LOSS OF POWER FOR SHUTTER 0 1 1

LOSS OF MOTOR CONTROL PANEL 0 1 1

LOSS OF AFA SYSTEM 0 1 1

LOSS OF WATER SUPPLIES 0 0 1

LOSS OF SPRINKLER PUMP 0 0 1

LOSS OF POWER FOR SPRINKLER 0 0 1

LOSS OF SPRINKLER ALARM VALVE 0 0 1

BLOCKAGE OF SPRINKLER HEADS 0 0 1

SPRINKLER SYSTEM IMPAIRMENT 0 0 1

TOTAL RISK SCORES 1 6 12



29/77

FAILURE RISK OF SPRINKLER-PROTECTED FIRE SHUTTER IS

12 TIMES HIGHER THAN FIRE RATED WALL AND 2 TIMES

HIGHER THAN FIRE SHUTTER

ACCORDING TO NFPA STATISTIC, AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER

SYSTEM CAN ONLY PROVIDE ABOUT 90% AVAILABILITY

IN HONG KONG, CHANGE OF OCCUPIERS IN COMMERCIALCOMPLEX ARE MORE FREQUENT. THE AVAILBILITY OF

SPRINKLER COULD BE LOWER THAN 85% (EQUIVALENT

TO 54 DAY IN A YEAR) FOR SYSTEM IMPAIRMENT

WATER DAMAGING RISK CAUSED BY DISCHARGE OFSPRINKLER SYSTEM IS MUCH HIGHER


PASSIVE FIRE PROTECTION


30/77

NO CODES AND STANDARDS PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS

ON THE DETAILED DESIGN OF SPRINKLER FOR

SUPPLEMENTING THE INSULATION PERFORMANCE OF

FIRE SHUTTER

NO FIRE TEST HAVE BEEN CARRIED OUT TO ESTABLISHTHE INSULATION PERFORMANCE OF SPRINKLER

PROTECTED FIRE SHUTTER

NO APPROVED / LISTED SPRINKLER PRODUCTS FOR FIRE

SHUTTER PROTECTION AND WETTING

CONCERNED ISSUES ON

SPRINKLER PROTECTED FIRE SHUTTER


31/77

CURRENT RESEARCHES AND TESTS ONLY FOR GLAZINGSYSTEM, WINDOW, DOOR AND WALL

FOR FIXED BARRIER NOT FOR ACTIVE BARRIER.

AUSTRALIAN STANDARD AS 2118.2 HIGHLIGHTED THAT

WALL WETTING SPRINKLERS ARE ONLY DESIGNED FORPROTECTION OF WINDOW OPENINGS WHICH SHALL BE

PERMANENTLY FIXED IN CLOSED POSITION

PROVE TO BE EFFECTIVE FOR BLOCKAGE OF RADIATION

BUT NO CERTIFICATION OF PERFORMANCE ON

ACHIEVMENT OF RADIATION STANDARDS, LIKE BS EN 1363

RADIATION PERFORMANCE CANNOT SUBSTITUTE

INSULATION PERFORMANCEM

CURRENT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FOR

WALL WETTNG SPRINKLER / DRENCHER

LIMITATIONS OF WALL WETTNG SPRINKLER /


32/77

NOT SUITABLE FOR HIGH HAZARD GROUP . FIRE

RESEARCH STATION UK REPORTED THAT HIGH TEMP.HEAT FLUX WITH MORE THAN 40 kW / m2 WOULD

AFFECT THE EVEN DISTRIBUTION OF WATER FILM

EFFECTIVENESS OF SPRINKLER IS STRONGLY DEPEND TO

THE CONTINUITY OF WATER FILM. AS2118.2 HIGHLIGHTTHAT DRY AREA ARE LIKELY TO CRACK FIRST.

WATER FILM IS STRONGLY DEPENDENT ON THE

CONFIGURATION AND ORIENTATION OF THE FIRE

BARRIER BEING PROTECTED.

HEIGHT LIMIT FOR EFFECTIVE DISTRIBUTION OF WATER

FILM. LISTED WALL WETTING SPRINKLER HEADS

PROVIDE UP TO 3.96 M HEIGHT COVERAGE

LIMITATIONS OF WALL WETTNG SPRINKLER /

DRENCHER


33/77

ROUGH AND UNEVEN SURFACE OF

FIRE SHUTTER WILL SERIOUSLY AFFECT

THE CONTINUITY OF WATER FILMAND IS UNABLE TO BE EFFECTIVELY

COOLED DOWN BY WALL WETTING

SPRINKLER / DRENCHER

MAJOR CHALLENGE OF WALL WETTNG


FOR PROTECTION OF FIRE SHUTTER


34/77

LOOSED INSULATION MATERIALS OF

FIRE SHUTTER, LIKE CERAMIC WOOL

CAN BE FLUSHED OUT BY SPRINKLERDISCHARGE AND TRIM DOWN THE FIRERATED PERFORMANCE OF FIRE SHUTTER





35/77

NON-WATER PROOFING INSULATION

MATERIALS OF FIRE SHUTTER, LIKE

CERAMIC WOOL MAY ABSORB

SIGNIFICANT WATER FROM

SPRINKLER DISCHARGE AND INCREASETHE DEAD LOAD OF THE FIRE SHUTTER

HENCE RENDER IT DROP DOWN AND

LOSE OF ITS INTERGRITY, ESPECIALLY

FOR THOSE FIXED BY RIVET ONLY




QUESTION ON SPRINKLER PROTECTED


36/77

SHALL WE TAKE SPRINKLER PROTECTED FIRE SHUTTER WITH

HIGHER FAILURE RISK ?

WOULD IT DIMINISH THE MARKET DRIVE FOR

DEVELOPMENT OF FULL INSULATION PERFORMANCE FIRE

SHUTTER ??

IF ADEQUATE FULL INSULATION PERFORMANCE FIRE

SHUTTERS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE MARKET, IS THERE ANY

FURTHER REASON TO CONTINUOUSLY USE SPRINKLERPROTECTED FIRE SHUTTERS ???

QUESTION ON SPRINKLER PROTECTED

FIRE SHUTTER

LIABILITY CONCERN ON


37/77

WHO SHOULD TAKE SUCH LIABILITIES FORINAPPROPRIATE DESIGN AND

INAPPROPRIATE APPLICATION OF

SPRINKLER FOR PROTECTION OF FIRE

SHUTTERS KNOWINGLY ?

THE GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES ?

THE PROJECT AUTHORIZED PERSON?

THE FIRE ENGINEER?

THE FSI CONTRACTOR? OR

THE OWNER OF THE PREMISES?

LIABILITY CONCERN ON

SPRINKLER PROTECTED FIRE SHUTTER?

?

?

SOLUTION TO INSULATION REQUIREMENTS


38/77

OF FIRE SHUTTERS BY

TECHNOLGY BREAKTHROUGH

SUPPLIER INSULATED FIRE SHUTTERIS --/240/240 VERTICAL DROP ROLLING FIRE SHUTTER

--/120/120 VERTICAL DROP ROLLING FIRE SHUTTER


-/240/240 OVERLAPPED VERTICAL DROP ROLLING

FIRE SHUTTER


FIRE SHUTTER


FIRE SHUTTER

-/120/120 LATERAL SLIDING FIRE SHUTTER

-/60/60 LATERAL SLIDING FIRE SHUTTER

SOLUTION TO INSULATION REQUIREMENTS


39/77

OF FIRE SHUTTERS BY

TECHNOLGY BREAKTHROUGH

SUPPLIER INSULATED FIRE SHUTTER

SK --/240/180 VERTICAL DROP ROLLING FIRE SHUTTER

--/240/30 LATERAL SLIDING FIRE SHUTTER

CT --/240/120 HORIZONTAL SLIDING FIRE SHUTTER


--/240/30 LATERAL SLIDING FIRE SHUTTER

SW --/240/30 LATERAL SLIDING FIRE SHUTTER

RESISTING TO FIRE PERFORMANCE


40/77

RESISTING TO FIRE PERFORMANCE

CHARACTERISTICS

I – INSULATIONIS THE ABILITY OF THE SEPARATING CONSTRUCTION TO

PREVENT THE TRANSMISSION OF FIRE BY TRANSFER OF

HEAT

AVERAGE TEMPERATURE RISE < 140OK

MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE RISE < 180OK

R – RADIATION

IS THE ABILITY OF THE SEPARATING CONSTRUCTION TO

PREVENT THE TRANSMISSION OF FIRE BY TRANFER OF

RADIANT HEAT

15 kW/m2 WITHIN 1M FROM UNEXPOSED SURFAC)

PROBLEMS IN PASSIVE FIRE PROTECTION


41/77


LIMITED CAPABILTIES OF METAL FIRE SHUTTERS

LIMITED INSULATION BULKY

HEAVY LOAD

LIMITED SPAN

LARGE HEADROOM

REQUIRED GUIDERAILS



42/77

LIMITED CAPABILTIES OF METAL FIRE SHUTTERS

WEAK TO WITHSTAND IMPACT FORCE


43/77

TRADITIONAL CONCEPT ONFIRE PERFORMANCE OF FABRIC

COMBUSTIBLE

NON-FIRE RESISTING


44/77

NEW TECHNOLOGY ON

FIRE PERFORMANCE OF FABRIC

NON-COMBUSTIBLE

FIRE RESISTING TO 1 HOUR, 2

HOURS AND 4 HOURS

INTUMESCENT COATING

PROVIDE RADIATIONINSULATION PERFORMANCE

SPECIAL COATING PROVIDE

WATER-PROOF, CHEMICAL

RESISTING, AND SMOKE SEALPERFORMANCE


45/77

NEW TECHNOLOGY ON


PATENTED COMPOSITE INSULATED MATERIALS

PROVIDE INSULATION PERFORMANCE UP TO 4 HOURS

THICKNESS UP TO 11.8 MM

WITH DIFFERENT LAYERSOF FIRE RESISTING AND

HEAT INSULATION FABRIC

THICKNESS OF OTHERBRAND UP TO 28 MM

WITH 3 HOURS

INSULATION ONLY

NEW TECHNOLOGY ON


46/77


FIRE RESISTING

THREAD ALLOWS

SEWING TO

LARGE SIZE UP

TO 100 M2

TESTING AND CERTIFICATION


47/77

TESTING AND CERTIFICATION

ALL PRODUCTS ARE TESTED

AND CERTIFIED BY HOKLASACCREDITED AND HOKLAS

MRA LABORATORY

TESTED AND CERTIFIED INACCORDANCE WITH THE

MOST UPDATED BS EN

STANDARDS, INCLUDING BS

EN 1363, BS EN 1364, BS EN

1634, BS EN 13501:2, BS EN12101

SOLUTION TO IMPACT RESISTANCE


48/77

ACHIEVE 50 KG IMPACT TEST AT VARIOUS

LOCATION OF FIRE SHUTTER

SOLUTION TO WIND RESISTANCE


49/77

ACHIEVE WIND RESISTANCE UP TO 68 KM/H

WIND SPEED EQUAL TO BEAUFORT SCALE OF 8

SOLUTION TO WATER RESISTANCE


50/77

ACHIEVE WATER RESISTANCE WITHOUT

WETTING THE SHUTTER INTERNAL LAYER EVEN

THE WHOLE SURFACE SPRAYED WITH WATER

NOZZLE AT 600 MM CENTRE TO CENTRE

NEW APPLICATION OF FABRIC


51/77

NEW APPLICATION OF FABRIC

IN FIRE RESISTING CONSTRUCTION

FIRE SHUTTER

INSULATED

RADIATION INSULATED

NON-INSULATED

VERTICAL ROLLING

VERTICAL ROLLING OVERLAPPED

LATERALLY SLIDING

HORIZONTAL SLIDING

FIRE RATED PARTITIONING SYSTEM NON-INSULATED TYPE

SMOKE CURTAIN

SOLUTIONS TO INSULATION REQUIREMENTS

BY INSULATED FIRE SHUTTER UP TO 4 HOURS


52/77

BY INSULATED FIRE SHUTTER UP TO 4 HOURS

DOUBLED FIRE SHUTTERS

TESTED TO EI30. EI60 EI120AND EI240 IN ACCORDANCE

WITH BS EN 1634:2008

FACE CAN TOUCH TO THE

UNEXPOSED FACE OF THETESTING SAMPLE AT 114

MINUTES OF THE FIRE TEST


BY INSULATED FIRE SHUTTER /240/180


53/77

BY INSULATED FIRE SHUTTER –/240/180

50 MM IN THICKNESS

SOLUTIONS TO LIMITED HEADROOM

CLEARANCE WITH SLIM TOP BOX


54/77


OTHER BRANDINSULATED FIRE SHUTTER

880 MM

1050 MM

4 0 8

M M

8

0 0 M M

SIZE COMPARISON WITH OTHER BRAND

FOR 3 M BY 3 M NON-OVERLAPPED FIRE SHUTTER

HI-TECH PRO

INSULATEDFIRE SHUTTER

SOLUTIONS TO LIMITED HEADROOM



55/77


980 MM

8 1 0 M

M

SIZE FOR 3 M BY 3 M OVERLAPPED FIRE SHUTTER

NO OVERLAPPED FIRE SHUTTER FROM OTHER BRAND

SOLUTION TO CURVED DESIGN

WITH LATERAL SLIDING FIRE SHUTTER


56/77


--120/120 INSULATED LATERAL SLIDING FIRE SHUTTER

MAXIMUM LENGTH UP TO 24 M FOR DOUBLE SHUTTERS

SOLUTION TO CURVED DESIGN



57/77


--/240/30 INSULATED LATERAL SLIDING FIRE SHUTTER


BY INSULATED FIRE SHUTTER


58/77

BY INSULATED FIRE SHUTTER

WITH UNLIMITED SPAN

OVERLAPPED MODEL OF

DOUBLE INSULATED

SHUTTERS SOLVE THE

PROBLEM WITH

UNLIMITED SPAN ACHIEVE 4 HOURS

INTEGRITY AND 4 HOURS

INSULATION

AVERAGE TEMPERATURERISE UP TO 92.8 OC ONLY

SLIM TOP BOX SIZE WITH

974 MM WIDTH AND 807

MM HEIGHT

SOLUTIONS TO LIMITED SPAN

BY OVERLAPPED FIRE SHUTTER


59/77

BY OVERLAPPED FIRE SHUTTER

UNLIMITED SPAN – PROJECT REFERENCE ATHEATHROW AIRPORT WITH 60 M SPAN

AND 10 M DROP

SOLUTIONS TO CURRENT PROBLEMS

FIRE SHUTTER BY LIGHT WEIGHT FIRE SHUTTER


60/77

FIRE SHUTTER BY LIGHT WEIGHT FIRE SHUTTER

LIGHT WEIGHT AND SLIM

GREAT SPAN AND DROP

FAIL SAFE

FREE CORNER POSTS SPLIT DROP DELAY

PROVISION OF ESCAPE

UP TO 4 HOURS INTREGRITY

AND INSULATION

SOLUTIONS TO MEANS OF ESCAPE

BY OVERLAPPED FIRE SHUTTERS

http://product%20promotion%20seminar%2C%20intumescent%20system/Curtain-Video.m4v


61/77

BY OVERLAPPED FIRE SHUTTERS

SOLUTIONS TO MEANS OF ESCAPE

WITH FLEXIBLE FABRIC EGRESS DOOR


62/77

PENDING FOR TESTING AND APPROVAL

SOLUTIONS TO TURNING AND CORNERS

WITH FREE POSTS AND GUIDE RAILS


63/77

PATENTED CORNER UNIT

TESTED UP TO 4 HOURS INTEGRITY


64/77

SOLUTION TO CURVED DESIGNWITH HORIZONTAL SLIDING FIRE SHUTTER


65/77

--/120/120 INSULATED HORIZONTALSLIDING FIRE SHUTTER

SOLUTIONS TO MULTIPLE MOTOR CONTROLBY ADVANCED MOTOR CONTROL PANEL


66/77

NEW MOTOR CONTROL PANEL CAN

CONNECT UP TO 16 FIRE AND SMOKE

SHUTTERS WITH POWER

CONSUMPTION UP TO 64A 220 VAC

CONSIDERATIONS FOR DESIGN OFFIRE SHUTTERS

TYPES OF SHUTTERS


67/77

TYPES OF SHUTTERS; VERTICAL, VERTICAL OVERLAPPED, SINGLELATERAL, DOUBLE LATERAL, HORIZONTAL

SIZES OF FIRE SHUTTERS – SHUTTER WEIGHT HEAVIER SHUTTER, LARGER MOTER, SLOWER SPEED

120 Nm AND 230 Nm (12 RPM), 330 Nm (8 RPM), 500 Nm (6 RPM)

LARGER MOTOR, LARGER SHUTTER BOX, GREATER CEILING SPACES

SPAN OF WALL OPENING –

VERTICAL SHUTTER - LENGTH OF BARREL; LATERAL SHUTTER – TRAVELING DISTANCE (


68/77

UP TO 4 HOUR INTEGRITY

SOLUTION TO TEMPORARY FIRE SEPARATIONWITH FABRIC FIRE RATED PARTITIONING SYSTEM


69/77

2 HOUR INTEGRITY

SOLUTION TO TEMPORARY FIRE SEPARATIONWITH FABRIC FIRE RATED PARTITIONING SYSTEM


70/77

FOR EASYPENETRATION OF

BUILDING SERVICES

TYPE OF SMOKE CURTAIN


71/77

UNDER BS EN 12101-1:2005+A1:2006

ASB1 – FAIL SAFE TYPE, OPERATES NOT LOWER THAN 2.5 M

ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR LEVEL.

ASB2 – NON-FAIL SAFE TYPE, OPERATES NOT LOWER THAN

2.5 M ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR LEVEL, FED FROM

EMERGENCY POWER SUPPLIES WITH FIRE RATEDCABLES

ASB3 – SAME AS ASB1, BUT CAN BE DEPLOYED TO ANY

HEIGHT

ASB4 – SAME AS ASB2, BUT CAN BE DEPLOYED TO ANYHEIGHT

BS EN 12101-1 FIRE TESTS

FOR SMOKE CURTAINS REQUIRED UNDER


72/77


NEW FIRE SAFETY CODE 2011

ANNEX B – OPERATIONAL TEST




73/77



ANNEX C – PERMEABILITY TO SMOKE (BS EN 1634-3)




74/77



ANNEX D – TEMPERATURE / TIME CLASSIFICATION (BS EN 1363)

BUDGET COST OF FABRIC FIRE SEPARATIONS

TYPEBUDGET COST


75/77

TYPE(HK$/M2)

FIRE SHUTTER E60 2,800FIRE SHUTTER E120 3,100

FIRE SHUTTER E240 4,500

FIRE SHUTTER CORNER UNIT E240 36,000

FIRE SHUTTE E240/EI240 18,000

FIRE SHUTTER E120/EI120 10,000

FIRE SHUTTER E60/EI60 8,000

FIRE SHUTTER E120/EW120 4,500

FIRE PARTITIONING SYSTEM E60 800



SMOKE CURTAIN Dh60 3,500

RECOMMENDATIONS


76/77

RECOMMENDATIONS

PRODUCTS TESTING AND CERTIFICATIONS

CONTRACTOR COMPETENCE AND TRAINING

THIRD PARTIES ASSESSMENT AND CERTIFICATION

PERIODICAL MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTIONS

UNDER MBIS


77/77

THANK YOU FOR YOUR LISTENING

PLEASE LET ME HAVE YOUR FEEDBACK

•At Email : [email protected]

cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises ...

Documents

Transcript of cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises ...