8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
1/77
Ir K T LEUNGBEng(Hons),GDAS, MSc, RPE(FRE), CEng, CEnv, CSHP FIFireE, MHKIE,
FEI, MCIBSE, MIGEM, MCIPHE, CMIOSH, RSO, RSA
•Email : [email protected] or [email protected]
•Phone : 9520 3484
TECHNICAL SEMINAR
ON
SOLUTIONS TO REVISED FIRE SEPARATION
REQUIREMENTS FOR EXISTING COMMERCIAL
PREMISES / BUILDINGS UNDER CHAPTER 502 FIRE
SAFETY (COMMERCIAL PREMISES) ORDINANCE AND
CHAPTER 572 FIRE SAFETY (BUILDINGS) ORDINANCE
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
2/77
NEW FIRE SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS FOR
COMMERCIAL PREMISES
SECTION C – FIRE RESISTING
CONSTRUCTION
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
3/77
NEW FIRE SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS FOR
COMMERCIAL PREMISES
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
4/77
NEW FIRE SAFETY CODES IN HONG KONG
SECTION C – FIRE RESISTINGCONSTRUCTION
SECTION E – FIRE
PROPERTIES OF BUILDING
ELEMENTS AND
COMPONENTS
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
5/77
MAJOR CHALLENGE IN
NEW FIRE SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS
INSULATION CRITERIA FOR FIRE SEPARATION
APPLIED TO EXISTING COMMERCIAL
PREMISES UNDER CHAPTER 572 LAWS OF
HONG KONG BY AMENDMENT OF FRC 1996
THROUGH PNAP APP-83
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
6/77
WHY INSULATION CRITERION OF
FIRE RESISTING CONSTRUCTIONIS SO IMPORTANT TO US ???
http://20150912%20insulation%20fire%20spearation%20veido.mp4/http://20150912%20insulation%20fire%20spearation%20veido.mp4/http://20150912%20insulation%20fire%20spearation%20veido.mp4/http://20150912%20insulation%20fire%20spearation%20veido.mp4/http://20150912%20insulation%20fire%20spearation%20veido.mp4/http://20150912%20insulation%20fire%20spearation%20veido.mp4/
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
7/77
PNAP, APP-83 - AMENDMENT TO PAGE 10
PARAGRAPH 10.6 OF FRC 1996
OPENINGS MAY BE MADE IN
COMPARTMENT WALLS FOR
COMMUNICATION, BUT NOT COMBINATION,OF ADJOINING COMPARTMENTS, PROVIDED
THAT ANY SUCH OPENING IS PROTECTED BY
A DOOR OR A FIRE SHUTTER WITH FRP AS
STIPULATED BELOW:
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
8/77
PNAP, APP-83 - AMENDMENT TO PAGE 10
PARAGRAPH 10.6 OF FRC 1996
a) IF THE TOTAL WIDTH OF THE OPENINGS
IS NOT MORE THAN 25% OF THE LENGTH
OF THE COMPARTMENT WALLSCONCERNED, THE DOOR OR FIRE
SHUTTER SHOULD HAVE THE SAME FRP
AS SUCH COMPARTMENT WALLS WITH
REGARD TO THE CRITERION OFINTEGRITY ONLY; AND
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
9/77
PNAP, APP-83 - AMENDMENT TO PAGE 10
PARAGRAPH 10.6 OF FRC 1996
b) IF THE TOTAL WIDTH OF THE OPENINGS IS MORETHAN 25% OF THE LENGTH OF THE COMPARTMENT
WALLS CONCERNED, THE DOOR OR FIRE SHUTTER
SHOULD HAVE THE SAME FRP AS SUCH
COMPARTMENT WALLS WITH REGARD TO THECRITERIA OF INTEGRITY AND INSULATION. SUCHFRP WITH REGARD TO THE CRITERION OF
INSULATION CAN BE REDUCED TO 30 MINUTES IF
ADDITIONAL SPRINKLER HEADS ARE PROVIDEDON EACH SIDE OF THE DOORS OR FIRE SHUTTERS
AND COMPLYING WITH THE FOLLOWING
REQUIREMENTS:
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
10/77
PNAP, APP-83 - AMENDMENT TO PAGE 10
PARAGRAPH 10.6 OF FRC 1996
1) THE ADDITIONAL SPRINKLER HEADS
SHOULD BE A PART OF THE SPRINKLER
SYSTEM OF THE BUILDING AND SHOULDCOMPLY WITH THE CODE OF PRACTICEFOR MINIMUM FIRE SERVICE
INSTALLATIONS AND EQUIPMENT; AND
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
11/77
PNAP, APP-83 - AMENDMENT TO PAGE 10
PARAGRAPH 10.6 OF FRC 1996
2) THE LAYOUT/ARRAY OF THE ADDITIONAL
SPRINKLER HEADS SHOULD BE PROVIDED TO
SUBSTANTIATE THE FULL COVERAGE OF
EACH SIDE OF THE DOOR OR FIRE
SHUTTER BY SPRINKLERS AND THESPACING OF SPRINKLER HEADS SHOULD
ALSO COMPLY WITH THE LPC RULES
INCORPORATING BS EN 12845:2003.”
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
12/77
PNAP, APP-83 - AMENDMENT TO PAGE 10
PARAGRAPH 10.6 OF FRC 1996
THIS PARAGRAPH IS APPLICABLE TO BUILDINGS ORBUILDING WORKS WITH CONSENT TO THE
COMMENCEMENT OF WHICH OBTAINED ON OR
AFTER 18 AUGUST 2011 (THE DATE ON WHICH THE
LAST REVISION OF THIS PRACTICE NOTE WASISSUED). FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBT, IN
RESPECT OF NEW BUILDINGS, THE RELEVANT
CONSENT REFERS TO THE CONSENT TO THE
COMMENCEMENT OF FOUNDATION WORKS OFSUCH BUILDINGS; AND IN RESPECT OF ALTERATIONS
AND ADDITIONS WORKS, THE RELEVANT CONSENT
REFERS TO THE CONSENT TO THE COMMENCEMENT
OF SUCH WORKS.
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
13/77
SHOULD SPRINKLER BE USED
FOR SUPPLEMENT THE FRR OF
FIRE SHUTTERS ?
CAN FIRE SAFETY
REQUIREMENTS FOR FIRE
COMPARTMENTATION BE
LIFTED UP FOR SPRINKLERPROTECTED BUILDINGS ?
CONTROVERSAL ISSUES ON
SPRINKLER PROTECTED FIRE SHUTTER ?
?
?
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
14/77
NEITHER LPC RULES NOR BS EN 12845:2003 COVER ANY SPECIFICATIONS OF SPRINKLER PROTECTION FORFIRE SHUTTER
NO APPROVED / LISTED PRODUCTS FOR SHUTTERWETTING SPRINKLER IS AVAILABLE IN THE MARKET
NO FIRE TEST HAS BEEN CONDUCTED TO PROVE THE FRRPERFORMANCE OF SPRINKLER PROTECTED FIRE SHUTTER
NO SPECIFICATION ON PHYSICAL BREAKDOWNRESISTANCE OF SHUTTER MATERIAL UNDER WATERACTION OF SPRINKLER OPERATIONS
CRITICAL CONCERNS ON
SPRINKLER PROTECTED FIRE SHUTTER
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
15/77
BD EMAIL ON 11TH JUNE 2015
CLARIFIED THAT IT WAS
BEYOND THE JURISDICTION OFBD. FSD SHOULD BE
CONSULTED ON THE
REQUIREMENTS ON
SPRINKLER SYSTEM OF A
BUILDING
BD CLARIFICATION ON
SPRINKLER DESIGN FOR
FIRE SHUTTER PROTECTION?
?
?
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
16/77
SDO (NEW PROJECT) CHAN
KAM FAI OF FSD CLEARLY
EXPRESSED HIS SERIOUS
CONCERN ON SUCHREQUIREMENTS ANDINDICATED THAT HE DID NOT
SUPPORT THIS APPROACH
AND WOULD NOT CARRY OUT
INSPECTION TO SUCHINSTALLATION DURING AN
HKIE SEMINAR IN 2014
CONTROVERSAL ISSUES ON
SPRINKLER PROTECTED FIRE SHUTTER ?
?
?
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
17/77
CLOSED TYPE SPRINKLER HEADS CANNOT PROVIDE FULL
COVERAGE ON EACH SIDE ; OPERATED ONE BY ONE ONLY
SPACING OF CONVENTIONAL SPRINKLER FOR HORIZONTALPLANE DESIGN NOT FOR VERTICAL PLANE DESIGN
STANDARD 60 MINUTES WATER SUPPLIES INADEQUATE
FOR PROTECTION OF FIRE SHUTTER WITH 120 OR 240
MINUTES FRR
DEFICIENCIES OF SHARING FIRE SUPPRESSION
SPRINKLER SYSTEM FOR FIRE SHUTTER
PROTECTION
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
18/77
ADDITIONAL SPRINKLERS OPERATION FOR FIRE SHUTTER
PROTECTION COULD EXCEED THE ASSUMED MAXIMUM
AREA OF OPERATION AS PER LPC RULES AND BS EN
12845:2003 EXCESSIVE SPRINKLER OPERATION COULD REDUCE THE
SYSTEM FLOW AND PRESSURE AND ADVERSELY AFFECT THE
PERFORMANCE FOR FIRE SUPPRESSION; THE ORIGINAL
PURPOSE OF SPRINKLER SYSTEM EXCESSIVE SPRINKLER OPERATION COULD SIGNIFICANTY
REDUCE THE DURATION OF WATER SUPPLIES TO LESS THAN
30 MINUTES
DEFICIENCIES OF SHARING FIRE SUPPRESSION
SPRINKLER SYSTEM FOR FIRE SHUTTER
PROTECTION
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
19/77
TYPE OF SPRINKLER
HEADS TO BE USED ?
CLOSED HEAD, OR
OPEN HEAD, OR
DRENCHER HEAD
UNCERTAINTIES OF CODE REQUIREMENTS
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
20/77
PATTERN OF SPRINKLER
HEADS TO BE USED ?
CONVENTIONAL , OR
SPRAY NOZZLE, OR
WALL WETTING, OR DRENCHER
UNCERTAINTIES OF CODE REQUIREMENTS
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
21/77
TYPE OF SPRINKLER
CONTROL TO BE USED ? SHARE SAME
CONTROL VALVE, OR
INDEPENDENT
CONTROL VALVE
NORMAL ALARM
VALVE, OR
DELUGE VALVE, OR
MULTIPLE JET
CONTROL
UNCERTAINTIES OF CODE REQUIREMENTS
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
22/77
OPERATION MODE OFSPRINKLER SYSTEM ?
HEAD BY HEAD, OR
SHUTTER BYSHUTTER ON BOTH
SIDES,
UNCERTAINTIES OF CODE REQUIREMENTS
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
23/77
DESIGNED DENSITY OF
COVERAGE OF FIRE
SHUTTER?
DESIGNED FLOW AND
PRESSURE?
UNCERTAINTIES OF CODE REQUIREMENTS
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
24/77
DESIGNED WATER SUPPLIES FOR
SPRINKLER SYSTEM? SHARED WITH FIRE
SUPPRESSION SYSTEM WHICH
IS ORGINALLY LIMITED FOR 40
TO 60 MINUTES ONLY, OR
PROVIDE ADDITIONAL WATER
SUPPLIES WITH SAME
DURATION OF FRR OF FIRE
SHUTTER AND FULLY CATER
FOR THE REQUIRED
OPERATION MODE
UNCERTAINTIES OF CODE REQUIREMENTS
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
25/77
LIMITATION ON APPLICATION?
ALL TYPE OF HAZARDGROUP ?
HOW ABOUT HIGH
HAZARD?
UNLIMITED SIZE OF FIRESHUTTER?
UNLIMITED HEIGHT OF
FIRE SHUTTER?
UNCERTAINTIES OF CODE REQUIREMENTS
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
26/77
CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR FIRE RATEDPERFORMANCE?
SEPARATE CERTIFICATION FOR SHUTTER WETTING
SPRINKLER AND FIRE SHUTTER OR
FULL CERTIFICATION FOR COMBINED SPRINKLER
PROTECTED FIRE SHUTTER
UNCERTAINTIES OF CODE REQUIREMENTS
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
27/77
DRENCHER IS A LONG ESTABLISHED PRACTICE
ACCEPTED BY FSD AS AN ALTERNATIVE FOR FIRE
SEPARTION
THE ONLY GUIDELINES ARE SHOWED IN FSD CIRCULAR
4/96 PART VIII SECTION 5 DATED 22 OCTOBER 1996
WATER SUPPLIES DURATION OF NOT LESS THAN 30MINUTES
DISCHARGE DENSITY = 10 l / m2 / min HOWEVER, NO AMENDMENT OR UPDATES TO COVER
SPRINKLER PROTECTION FOR FIRE SHUTTER
FSD REQUIREMENTS FOR DRENCHER SYSTEM
RISK PERCEPTION ON FAILURE OF
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
28/77
RISK PERCEPTION ON FAILURE OF
PASSIVE FIRE PROTECTION
RISK OF FAILUREFIRE RATED
WALL
FIRE
SHUTTER
SPRINKLER PROECTED
SHUTTERLOSS INTEGRITY 1 1 1
BLOCKAGE OF SHUTTER 0 1 1
LOSS OF MOTOR OF SHUTTER 0 1 1
LOSS OF POWER FOR SHUTTER 0 1 1
LOSS OF MOTOR CONTROL PANEL 0 1 1
LOSS OF AFA SYSTEM 0 1 1
LOSS OF WATER SUPPLIES 0 0 1
LOSS OF SPRINKLER PUMP 0 0 1
LOSS OF POWER FOR SPRINKLER 0 0 1
LOSS OF SPRINKLER ALARM VALVE 0 0 1
BLOCKAGE OF SPRINKLER HEADS 0 0 1
SPRINKLER SYSTEM IMPAIRMENT 0 0 1
TOTAL RISK SCORES 1 6 12
RISK PERCEPTION ON FAILURE OF
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
29/77
FAILURE RISK OF SPRINKLER-PROTECTED FIRE SHUTTER IS
12 TIMES HIGHER THAN FIRE RATED WALL AND 2 TIMES
HIGHER THAN FIRE SHUTTER
ACCORDING TO NFPA STATISTIC, AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER
SYSTEM CAN ONLY PROVIDE ABOUT 90% AVAILABILITY
IN HONG KONG, CHANGE OF OCCUPIERS IN COMMERCIALCOMPLEX ARE MORE FREQUENT. THE AVAILBILITY OF
SPRINKLER COULD BE LOWER THAN 85% (EQUIVALENT
TO 54 DAY IN A YEAR) FOR SYSTEM IMPAIRMENT
WATER DAMAGING RISK CAUSED BY DISCHARGE OFSPRINKLER SYSTEM IS MUCH HIGHER
RISK PERCEPTION ON FAILURE OF
PASSIVE FIRE PROTECTION
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
30/77
NO CODES AND STANDARDS PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS
ON THE DETAILED DESIGN OF SPRINKLER FOR
SUPPLEMENTING THE INSULATION PERFORMANCE OF
FIRE SHUTTER
NO FIRE TEST HAVE BEEN CARRIED OUT TO ESTABLISHTHE INSULATION PERFORMANCE OF SPRINKLER
PROTECTED FIRE SHUTTER
NO APPROVED / LISTED SPRINKLER PRODUCTS FOR FIRE
SHUTTER PROTECTION AND WETTING
CONCERNED ISSUES ON
SPRINKLER PROTECTED FIRE SHUTTER
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
31/77
CURRENT RESEARCHES AND TESTS ONLY FOR GLAZINGSYSTEM, WINDOW, DOOR AND WALL
FOR FIXED BARRIER NOT FOR ACTIVE BARRIER.
AUSTRALIAN STANDARD AS 2118.2 HIGHLIGHTED THAT
WALL WETTING SPRINKLERS ARE ONLY DESIGNED FORPROTECTION OF WINDOW OPENINGS WHICH SHALL BE
PERMANENTLY FIXED IN CLOSED POSITION
PROVE TO BE EFFECTIVE FOR BLOCKAGE OF RADIATION
BUT NO CERTIFICATION OF PERFORMANCE ON
ACHIEVMENT OF RADIATION STANDARDS, LIKE BS EN 1363
RADIATION PERFORMANCE CANNOT SUBSTITUTE
INSULATION PERFORMANCEM
CURRENT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FOR
WALL WETTNG SPRINKLER / DRENCHER
LIMITATIONS OF WALL WETTNG SPRINKLER /
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
32/77
NOT SUITABLE FOR HIGH HAZARD GROUP . FIRE
RESEARCH STATION UK REPORTED THAT HIGH TEMP.HEAT FLUX WITH MORE THAN 40 kW / m2 WOULD
AFFECT THE EVEN DISTRIBUTION OF WATER FILM
EFFECTIVENESS OF SPRINKLER IS STRONGLY DEPEND TO
THE CONTINUITY OF WATER FILM. AS2118.2 HIGHLIGHTTHAT DRY AREA ARE LIKELY TO CRACK FIRST.
WATER FILM IS STRONGLY DEPENDENT ON THE
CONFIGURATION AND ORIENTATION OF THE FIRE
BARRIER BEING PROTECTED.
HEIGHT LIMIT FOR EFFECTIVE DISTRIBUTION OF WATER
FILM. LISTED WALL WETTING SPRINKLER HEADS
PROVIDE UP TO 3.96 M HEIGHT COVERAGE
LIMITATIONS OF WALL WETTNG SPRINKLER /
DRENCHER
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
33/77
ROUGH AND UNEVEN SURFACE OF
FIRE SHUTTER WILL SERIOUSLY AFFECT
THE CONTINUITY OF WATER FILMAND IS UNABLE TO BE EFFECTIVELY
COOLED DOWN BY WALL WETTING
SPRINKLER / DRENCHER
MAJOR CHALLENGE OF WALL WETTNG
SPRINKLER / DRENCHER
FOR PROTECTION OF FIRE SHUTTER
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
34/77
LOOSED INSULATION MATERIALS OF
FIRE SHUTTER, LIKE CERAMIC WOOL
CAN BE FLUSHED OUT BY SPRINKLERDISCHARGE AND TRIM DOWN THE FIRERATED PERFORMANCE OF FIRE SHUTTER
MAJOR CHALLENGE OF WALL WETTNG
SPRINKLER / DRENCHER
FOR PROTECTION OF FIRE SHUTTER
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
35/77
NON-WATER PROOFING INSULATION
MATERIALS OF FIRE SHUTTER, LIKE
CERAMIC WOOL MAY ABSORB
SIGNIFICANT WATER FROM
SPRINKLER DISCHARGE AND INCREASETHE DEAD LOAD OF THE FIRE SHUTTER
HENCE RENDER IT DROP DOWN AND
LOSE OF ITS INTERGRITY, ESPECIALLY
FOR THOSE FIXED BY RIVET ONLY
MAJOR CHALLENGE OF WALL WETTNG
SPRINKLER / DRENCHER
FOR PROTECTION OF FIRE SHUTTER
QUESTION ON SPRINKLER PROTECTED
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
36/77
SHALL WE TAKE SPRINKLER PROTECTED FIRE SHUTTER WITH
HIGHER FAILURE RISK ?
WOULD IT DIMINISH THE MARKET DRIVE FOR
DEVELOPMENT OF FULL INSULATION PERFORMANCE FIRE
SHUTTER ??
IF ADEQUATE FULL INSULATION PERFORMANCE FIRE
SHUTTERS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE MARKET, IS THERE ANY
FURTHER REASON TO CONTINUOUSLY USE SPRINKLERPROTECTED FIRE SHUTTERS ???
QUESTION ON SPRINKLER PROTECTED
FIRE SHUTTER
LIABILITY CONCERN ON
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
37/77
WHO SHOULD TAKE SUCH LIABILITIES FORINAPPROPRIATE DESIGN AND
INAPPROPRIATE APPLICATION OF
SPRINKLER FOR PROTECTION OF FIRE
SHUTTERS KNOWINGLY ?
THE GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES ?
THE PROJECT AUTHORIZED PERSON?
THE FIRE ENGINEER?
THE FSI CONTRACTOR? OR
THE OWNER OF THE PREMISES?
LIABILITY CONCERN ON
SPRINKLER PROTECTED FIRE SHUTTER?
?
?
SOLUTION TO INSULATION REQUIREMENTS
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
38/77
OF FIRE SHUTTERS BY
TECHNOLGY BREAKTHROUGH
SUPPLIER INSULATED FIRE SHUTTERIS --/240/240 VERTICAL DROP ROLLING FIRE SHUTTER
--/120/120 VERTICAL DROP ROLLING FIRE SHUTTER
--/60/60 VERTICAL DROP ROLLING FIRE SHUTTER
-/240/240 OVERLAPPED VERTICAL DROP ROLLING
FIRE SHUTTER
-/120/120 OVERLAPPED VERTICAL DROP ROLLING
FIRE SHUTTER
-/60/60 OVERLAPPED VERTICAL DROP ROLLING
FIRE SHUTTER
-/120/120 LATERAL SLIDING FIRE SHUTTER
-/60/60 LATERAL SLIDING FIRE SHUTTER
SOLUTION TO INSULATION REQUIREMENTS
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
39/77
OF FIRE SHUTTERS BY
TECHNOLGY BREAKTHROUGH
SUPPLIER INSULATED FIRE SHUTTER
SK --/240/180 VERTICAL DROP ROLLING FIRE SHUTTER
--/240/30 LATERAL SLIDING FIRE SHUTTER
CT --/240/120 HORIZONTAL SLIDING FIRE SHUTTER
--/240/60 VERTICAL DROP ROLLING FIRE SHUTTER
--/240/30 LATERAL SLIDING FIRE SHUTTER
SW --/240/30 LATERAL SLIDING FIRE SHUTTER
RESISTING TO FIRE PERFORMANCE
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
40/77
RESISTING TO FIRE PERFORMANCE
CHARACTERISTICS
I – INSULATIONIS THE ABILITY OF THE SEPARATING CONSTRUCTION TO
PREVENT THE TRANSMISSION OF FIRE BY TRANSFER OF
HEAT
AVERAGE TEMPERATURE RISE < 140OK
MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE RISE < 180OK
R – RADIATION
IS THE ABILITY OF THE SEPARATING CONSTRUCTION TO
PREVENT THE TRANSMISSION OF FIRE BY TRANFER OF
RADIANT HEAT
15 kW/m2 WITHIN 1M FROM UNEXPOSED SURFAC)
PROBLEMS IN PASSIVE FIRE PROTECTION
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
41/77
PROBLEMS IN PASSIVE FIRE PROTECTION
LIMITED CAPABILTIES OF METAL FIRE SHUTTERS
LIMITED INSULATION BULKY
HEAVY LOAD
LIMITED SPAN
LARGE HEADROOM
REQUIRED GUIDERAILS
PROBLEMS IN PASSIVE FIRE PROTECTION
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
42/77
LIMITED CAPABILTIES OF METAL FIRE SHUTTERS
WEAK TO WITHSTAND IMPACT FORCE
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
43/77
TRADITIONAL CONCEPT ONFIRE PERFORMANCE OF FABRIC
COMBUSTIBLE
NON-FIRE RESISTING
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
44/77
NEW TECHNOLOGY ON
FIRE PERFORMANCE OF FABRIC
NON-COMBUSTIBLE
FIRE RESISTING TO 1 HOUR, 2
HOURS AND 4 HOURS
INTUMESCENT COATING
PROVIDE RADIATIONINSULATION PERFORMANCE
SPECIAL COATING PROVIDE
WATER-PROOF, CHEMICAL
RESISTING, AND SMOKE SEALPERFORMANCE
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
45/77
NEW TECHNOLOGY ON
FIRE PERFORMANCE OF FABRIC
PATENTED COMPOSITE INSULATED MATERIALS
PROVIDE INSULATION PERFORMANCE UP TO 4 HOURS
THICKNESS UP TO 11.8 MM
WITH DIFFERENT LAYERSOF FIRE RESISTING AND
HEAT INSULATION FABRIC
THICKNESS OF OTHERBRAND UP TO 28 MM
WITH 3 HOURS
INSULATION ONLY
NEW TECHNOLOGY ON
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
46/77
FIRE PERFORMANCE OF FABRIC
FIRE RESISTING
THREAD ALLOWS
SEWING TO
LARGE SIZE UP
TO 100 M2
TESTING AND CERTIFICATION
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
47/77
TESTING AND CERTIFICATION
ALL PRODUCTS ARE TESTED
AND CERTIFIED BY HOKLASACCREDITED AND HOKLAS
MRA LABORATORY
TESTED AND CERTIFIED INACCORDANCE WITH THE
MOST UPDATED BS EN
STANDARDS, INCLUDING BS
EN 1363, BS EN 1364, BS EN
1634, BS EN 13501:2, BS EN12101
SOLUTION TO IMPACT RESISTANCE
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
48/77
ACHIEVE 50 KG IMPACT TEST AT VARIOUS
LOCATION OF FIRE SHUTTER
SOLUTION TO WIND RESISTANCE
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
49/77
ACHIEVE WIND RESISTANCE UP TO 68 KM/H
WIND SPEED EQUAL TO BEAUFORT SCALE OF 8
SOLUTION TO WATER RESISTANCE
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
50/77
ACHIEVE WATER RESISTANCE WITHOUT
WETTING THE SHUTTER INTERNAL LAYER EVEN
THE WHOLE SURFACE SPRAYED WITH WATER
NOZZLE AT 600 MM CENTRE TO CENTRE
NEW APPLICATION OF FABRIC
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
51/77
NEW APPLICATION OF FABRIC
IN FIRE RESISTING CONSTRUCTION
FIRE SHUTTER
INSULATED
RADIATION INSULATED
NON-INSULATED
VERTICAL ROLLING
VERTICAL ROLLING OVERLAPPED
LATERALLY SLIDING
HORIZONTAL SLIDING
FIRE RATED PARTITIONING SYSTEM NON-INSULATED TYPE
SMOKE CURTAIN
SOLUTIONS TO INSULATION REQUIREMENTS
BY INSULATED FIRE SHUTTER UP TO 4 HOURS
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
52/77
BY INSULATED FIRE SHUTTER UP TO 4 HOURS
DOUBLED FIRE SHUTTERS
TESTED TO EI30. EI60 EI120AND EI240 IN ACCORDANCE
WITH BS EN 1634:2008
FACE CAN TOUCH TO THE
UNEXPOSED FACE OF THETESTING SAMPLE AT 114
MINUTES OF THE FIRE TEST
SOLUTIONS TO INSULATION REQUIREMENTS
BY INSULATED FIRE SHUTTER /240/180
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
53/77
BY INSULATED FIRE SHUTTER –/240/180
50 MM IN THICKNESS
SOLUTIONS TO LIMITED HEADROOM
CLEARANCE WITH SLIM TOP BOX
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
54/77
CLEARANCE WITH SLIM TOP BOX
OTHER BRANDINSULATED FIRE SHUTTER
880 MM
1050 MM
4 0 8
M M
8
0 0 M M
SIZE COMPARISON WITH OTHER BRAND
FOR 3 M BY 3 M NON-OVERLAPPED FIRE SHUTTER
HI-TECH PRO
INSULATEDFIRE SHUTTER
SOLUTIONS TO LIMITED HEADROOM
CLEARANCE WITH SLIM TOP BOX
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
55/77
CLEARANCE WITH SLIM TOP BOX
980 MM
8 1 0 M
M
SIZE FOR 3 M BY 3 M OVERLAPPED FIRE SHUTTER
NO OVERLAPPED FIRE SHUTTER FROM OTHER BRAND
SOLUTION TO CURVED DESIGN
WITH LATERAL SLIDING FIRE SHUTTER
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
56/77
WITH LATERAL SLIDING FIRE SHUTTER
--120/120 INSULATED LATERAL SLIDING FIRE SHUTTER
MAXIMUM LENGTH UP TO 24 M FOR DOUBLE SHUTTERS
SOLUTION TO CURVED DESIGN
WITH LATERAL SLIDING FIRE SHUTTER
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
57/77
WITH LATERAL SLIDING FIRE SHUTTER
--/240/30 INSULATED LATERAL SLIDING FIRE SHUTTER
SOLUTIONS TO INSULATION REQUIREMENTS
BY INSULATED FIRE SHUTTER
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
58/77
BY INSULATED FIRE SHUTTER
WITH UNLIMITED SPAN
OVERLAPPED MODEL OF
DOUBLE INSULATED
SHUTTERS SOLVE THE
PROBLEM WITH
UNLIMITED SPAN ACHIEVE 4 HOURS
INTEGRITY AND 4 HOURS
INSULATION
AVERAGE TEMPERATURERISE UP TO 92.8 OC ONLY
SLIM TOP BOX SIZE WITH
974 MM WIDTH AND 807
MM HEIGHT
SOLUTIONS TO LIMITED SPAN
BY OVERLAPPED FIRE SHUTTER
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
59/77
BY OVERLAPPED FIRE SHUTTER
UNLIMITED SPAN – PROJECT REFERENCE ATHEATHROW AIRPORT WITH 60 M SPAN
AND 10 M DROP
SOLUTIONS TO CURRENT PROBLEMS
FIRE SHUTTER BY LIGHT WEIGHT FIRE SHUTTER
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
60/77
FIRE SHUTTER BY LIGHT WEIGHT FIRE SHUTTER
LIGHT WEIGHT AND SLIM
GREAT SPAN AND DROP
FAIL SAFE
FREE CORNER POSTS SPLIT DROP DELAY
PROVISION OF ESCAPE
UP TO 4 HOURS INTREGRITY
AND INSULATION
SOLUTIONS TO MEANS OF ESCAPE
BY OVERLAPPED FIRE SHUTTERS
http://product%20promotion%20seminar%2C%20intumescent%20system/Curtain-Video.m4v
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
61/77
BY OVERLAPPED FIRE SHUTTERS
SOLUTIONS TO MEANS OF ESCAPE
WITH FLEXIBLE FABRIC EGRESS DOOR
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
62/77
PENDING FOR TESTING AND APPROVAL
SOLUTIONS TO TURNING AND CORNERS
WITH FREE POSTS AND GUIDE RAILS
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
63/77
PATENTED CORNER UNIT
TESTED UP TO 4 HOURS INTEGRITY
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
64/77
SOLUTION TO CURVED DESIGNWITH HORIZONTAL SLIDING FIRE SHUTTER
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
65/77
--/120/120 INSULATED HORIZONTALSLIDING FIRE SHUTTER
SOLUTIONS TO MULTIPLE MOTOR CONTROLBY ADVANCED MOTOR CONTROL PANEL
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
66/77
NEW MOTOR CONTROL PANEL CAN
CONNECT UP TO 16 FIRE AND SMOKE
SHUTTERS WITH POWER
CONSUMPTION UP TO 64A 220 VAC
CONSIDERATIONS FOR DESIGN OFFIRE SHUTTERS
TYPES OF SHUTTERS
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
67/77
TYPES OF SHUTTERS; VERTICAL, VERTICAL OVERLAPPED, SINGLELATERAL, DOUBLE LATERAL, HORIZONTAL
SIZES OF FIRE SHUTTERS – SHUTTER WEIGHT HEAVIER SHUTTER, LARGER MOTER, SLOWER SPEED
120 Nm AND 230 Nm (12 RPM), 330 Nm (8 RPM), 500 Nm (6 RPM)
LARGER MOTOR, LARGER SHUTTER BOX, GREATER CEILING SPACES
SPAN OF WALL OPENING –
VERTICAL SHUTTER - LENGTH OF BARREL; LATERAL SHUTTER – TRAVELING DISTANCE (
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
68/77
UP TO 4 HOUR INTEGRITY
SOLUTION TO TEMPORARY FIRE SEPARATIONWITH FABRIC FIRE RATED PARTITIONING SYSTEM
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
69/77
2 HOUR INTEGRITY
SOLUTION TO TEMPORARY FIRE SEPARATIONWITH FABRIC FIRE RATED PARTITIONING SYSTEM
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
70/77
FOR EASYPENETRATION OF
BUILDING SERVICES
TYPE OF SMOKE CURTAIN
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
71/77
UNDER BS EN 12101-1:2005+A1:2006
ASB1 – FAIL SAFE TYPE, OPERATES NOT LOWER THAN 2.5 M
ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR LEVEL.
ASB2 – NON-FAIL SAFE TYPE, OPERATES NOT LOWER THAN
2.5 M ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR LEVEL, FED FROM
EMERGENCY POWER SUPPLIES WITH FIRE RATEDCABLES
ASB3 – SAME AS ASB1, BUT CAN BE DEPLOYED TO ANY
HEIGHT
ASB4 – SAME AS ASB2, BUT CAN BE DEPLOYED TO ANYHEIGHT
BS EN 12101-1 FIRE TESTS
FOR SMOKE CURTAINS REQUIRED UNDER
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
72/77
FOR SMOKE CURTAINS REQUIRED UNDER
NEW FIRE SAFETY CODE 2011
ANNEX B – OPERATIONAL TEST
BS EN 12101-1 FIRE TESTS
FOR SMOKE CURTAINS REQUIRED UNDER
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
73/77
FOR SMOKE CURTAINS REQUIRED UNDER
NEW FIRE SAFETY CODE 2011
ANNEX C – PERMEABILITY TO SMOKE (BS EN 1634-3)
BS EN 12101-1 FIRE TESTS
FOR SMOKE CURTAINS REQUIRED UNDER
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
74/77
FOR SMOKE CURTAINS REQUIRED UNDER
NEW FIRE SAFETY CODE 2011
ANNEX D – TEMPERATURE / TIME CLASSIFICATION (BS EN 1363)
BUDGET COST OF FABRIC FIRE SEPARATIONS
TYPEBUDGET COST
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
75/77
TYPE(HK$/M2)
FIRE SHUTTER E60 2,800FIRE SHUTTER E120 3,100
FIRE SHUTTER E240 4,500
FIRE SHUTTER CORNER UNIT E240 36,000
FIRE SHUTTE E240/EI240 18,000
FIRE SHUTTER E120/EI120 10,000
FIRE SHUTTER E60/EI60 8,000
FIRE SHUTTER E120/EW120 4,500
FIRE PARTITIONING SYSTEM E60 800
FIRE PARTITIONING SYSTEM E120 1000
FIRE PARTITIONING SYSTEM E240 1500
SMOKE CURTAIN Dh60 3,500
RECOMMENDATIONS
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
76/77
RECOMMENDATIONS
PRODUCTS TESTING AND CERTIFICATIONS
CONTRACTOR COMPETENCE AND TRAINING
THIRD PARTIES ASSESSMENT AND CERTIFICATION
PERIODICAL MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTIONS
UNDER MBIS
8/17/2019 cpd-2016029 Solutions to Revised Fire Separation Requirements for Existing Commercial Premises Buildings Under Chapter 502 & 572.pdf
77/77
THANK YOU FOR YOUR LISTENING
PLEASE LET ME HAVE YOUR FEEDBACK
•At Email : [email protected]
Top Related