Las Vegas Realtor Comparables on Valley Regal and Valley Spruce
Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
-
Upload
felipelopez1 -
Category
Documents
-
view
225 -
download
0
Transcript of Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
1/41
Comparables Analysis and
Precedents Transactions
November 3, 2012
Joshua Jia | Instructor / CEOJules Koifman | InstructorAlexander Banh | CSO
In partnership with the
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
2/41
Preparing for finance recruiting isnt just skimming The Vault anymore. Studentsshould study for recruiting like a course anddo their homework, because the finalexam is the interview. VP, recruiter for Queens
Like a course, there should be: Homework: regular readings are necessary Practice (mock interviews) Comprehensive, accessible resources for all interested students
The most important exam of any Commerce students life
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
Recruiting1
Finance Interview Preparation Workshops
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
3/41
Candidates differentiate themselves by knowing hard M&A and LBO questions
Queens needs to offer comprehensive resources to continue being competitive
Further Queens Commerces reputation as a career-minded institution
6 Sessions: Saturdays at 4 p.m., Thursdays at 7 p.m.: November 3November 22
1. Comparables Analysis and Precedent Transactions2. Discounted Cash Flows and Accounting3. Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A)4. Leveraged Buyouts (LBO)
5. Market Questions6. Fit / Deals / Networking
Finance Interview Preparation Workshops
Limestone Capital Offering2
Rationale
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
4/41
3
Information Sessions
The Process
Second week of November Look professional Meet people, get business cards or remember names, follow up Dont ask fluffy, general questions just for the sake of asking them
If you ask generic questions, you will get generic answers Ask about the business, deals, what they like about working at X firm
Interviews
First rounds: third or fourth week of November 80% technical
Final rounds: fourth week of November or first week of December
Mostly fit The dinner Be ready for exploding offers
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
5/41
4
Capital Markets
Jobs in Capital Markets
Industry Groups:
Metals & Mining (BMO) Financials TMT (CIBC) Real Estate (TD,
Brookfield) Healthcare Consumer Infrastructure Diversified Oil & Gas (Calgary)
Product Groups
M&A Equity Capital Markets Debt Capital Markets Syndication Restructuring
Investment Banking Equity Research Sales & Trading
Groups:
Equity Fixed Income Economic Quantitative
Sovereign
Groups:
Equity Fixed Income Derivatives Currencies
Automated Trading Asset-Backed
Securities
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
6/41
5
How is Enterprise Value calculated?
Enterprise Value
Two ways to think about Enterprise Value (EV)
Value of the firm: both debt and equity
Theoretical takeover price (no control premium)
Enterprise Value = Market Cap. + Preferred Equity + Minority Interest + Debt - Cash
Why do we use Enterprise Value?
Market cap. only measures the equity value
Ignores debt and preferred shares
Enterprise value represents the value of the firm to both debt and equity holders
The market value of all capitalinvested in the business
Multiples using EV are more comparable
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
7/41
6
Why do we subtract cash?
Enterprise Value
Imagine buying a company that consisted of the following: Piggy bank with $99 inside
The piggy is worth $1
EV represents the theoretical takeover price
Let the owner keep the $99, pay $1 for the piggy
Buying cash with cash is redundant, so we net it out
Paying off debt with cash
If a company only has $10 of debt and $10 of cash on its balance sheet, it has an
Enterprise Value of zero You can pay off the $10 of debt with $10 of cash; this company is worthless
Debt - Cash = Net Debt
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
8/41
7 Enterprise Value
Why do we add preferred equity?
In accounting, equity refers to both common and preferred equity
In finance, equity value (market cap.) only consists of common shares
Preferred equity is treated more like debt
Price doesnt move much, dividends are like interest
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
9/41
8
What are multiples?
Multiples
When we buy stock, we are paying to own a piece of a companys cash flows Although we dont receive the cash, market price should adjust to reflect changes
in expectations of these projected cash flows
Multiples: how much the market is valuing a company relative to the value
stakeholders are receiving, e.g. how much cash that company is generating
How long before I get my money back?
Assume price to earnings ratio of 5
Paying $5 for $1 of earnings
5 years before those earnings add up to original price paid
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
10/41
9 Common Multiples
Equity Multiples
Price / Earnings: how much are
shareholders paying for $1 of earnings?
Price / Book: how much are
shareholders paying for $1 of equity
book value?
Book represents book value of
equity per share
Price / Tangible Book Value
Tangible Book Value does not
include intangible assets like
patents and Goodwill
Price / Cash Flow
Operating cash flow per share
Enterprise Multiples
Enterprise Value (EV) / EBITDA: how
much are stakeholders (both
bondholders and shareholders) paying
for $1 of EBITDA generation?
EV / EBIT
EV / Revenue
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
11/41
10 Forward Multiples
Valuing future growth vs. historical growth
Historical last twelve months (LTM) vs. projected next twelve months (NTM)
Historical multiples include EV / LTM EBITDA, EV / LTM Revenue, and Price / LTM EPS
Forward multiples include EV / NTM EBITDA, EV / NTM Revenue and Price / NTM EPS
Price / Earnings-to-Growth
Known as PEG
Price / Earnings Ratio
Annual EPS Growth
Most people prefer forward multiples because it accounts for projected growth
LTM results may be a poor proxy for projected growth because of:
One-time charges
Tax (NOLs)
Past Futurecircumstances have changed
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
12/41
11
Multiples must be consistent
Apples-to-Apples
Numerator / Denominator must be the same unit
Dividing kilometers by miles is not meaningful
Apples-to-Apples vs. Apples-to-Oranges
Equity value metrics and enterprise value metrics are different
Value to shareholders vs. value to ALL stakeholders (shareholders, bondholders,preferred shareholders)
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
13/41
12
Multiples must be consistent
Apples-to-Apples
Price / Revenue is not meaningful
Price represents the market value of equityholdersholdings
Revenue goes to ALL stakeholders
EV / Earnings is not meaningful
Enterprise value represents the value of the entire firm
Earnings represents value to shareholderssince interest has been deducted
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
14/41
13
Why is EV / EBITDA generally better than P / E?
EV / EBITDA vs. P / E
P / E is an equity metric, while EV / EBITDA is an enterprise metric
P / E only looks at equity portion, ignores debt / preferred shareholders
P / E is not capital structure neutral
P / E is highly dependent on leverage
More debt
more risk to shareholders
shareholders demand lower P / E
Even if debt is cheaper than equity, the P / E metric will penalize companies who
choose to finance through debt
Using P / E to value companies violates M&M theory
EV / EBITDA is capital structure neutral
The mix of equity and debt does not change EV assuming similar cost of capital
Doesnt matter how you slice the pie, total EV is the same
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
15/41
14
What are some issues with using earnings?
Earnings vs. EBITDA
Earnings are subject to manipulation, one-time charges, differing accounting policies,
non-cash expenses, and ambiguity
e.g. Enron
Why do we like EBITDA?
EBITDA is more similar to cash flow and is capital structure neutral
Less room for manipulation
Ignores D&A, a non-cash expense
Ignores interest expense; EBITDA is available to shareholders, bondholders, and
preferred shareholders
EBITDA is a proxy for cash flow available to all stakeholders
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
16/41
15
When is P / E better than EV / EBITDA?
Advantages of P / E
If interest is a part of a companys cost of doing business
Banks, financial institutions
Financial
If companies in the industry have negligible amounts of debt
Tech companies
Junior mining companies
Volatile businesses (e.g. startups)
If you are valuing a minority investment
Equity investments with
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
17/41
16
What is minority interest?
Minority Interest
Also known as non-controlling interest If we own more than 50% of a subsidiary, we consolidate our financial statements with
the subsidiarys
Even if we own only 51% of Company S, 100% of Company Ss income statement line
items are added to our income statement line items
However, only 51% of Company Ss balance sheet line items are added to our
balance sheet items
49% of Company Ss net assets (assetsliabilities) go into minority interest
Minority interest is the part of a subsidiary that we dont own
Found in equity section of balance sheet (IFRS)
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
18/41
17
How do we consolidate the parent and subsidiary?
Minority Interest
Parent Corp.
-Income Statement
-Balance Sheet
Subsidiary Corp.
-Income Statement
-Balance Sheet
Consolidated Entity
(Reported by Parent Corporation) Combined Balance Sheet, line-by-line Combined Income Statement, line-by-line Eliminate things like
inter-company gains and losses inter-company balances (Assets/Liabilities) Parents investment in the subsidiary company
Minority interest reported (the percent of the subsidiary not owned by theparent) on both statements
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
19/41
18
Why do we add minority interest to get Enterprise Value?
Minority Interest
EV = Market Cap + Preferred Equity + DebtCash + Minority Interest In enterprise multiples, EV is the numerator, and an income statement line item is
often the denominator
Denominator: Income statement line items are consolidated and include 100% of the
subsidiarys (Company S) income statement line items
Numerator:Market Cap + Preferred Equity + Debt accounts for 51% of Company S
The 49% we dont own is not factored into the prices of the parents stock,
bonds, or preferred shares
To make the numerator consistent with the denominator, we add in the 49% of
Company S we dont own (minority interest)
To make multiples like EV / EBITDA, EV / EBIT and EV / Revenue an apples-to-
apples comparison, we add minority interest
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
20/41
19
EV / EBITDA Apples-to-Apples
Minority Interest
Market Capitalization + Minority Interest + Preferred Equity + DebtCash
Add the portion of the subsidiary we dont ownso numerator and denominator are consistent
Enterprise Value
EBITDA
subsidiary consolidated byadding minority interest
subsidiary consolidated
from accounting rules
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
21/41
20
What if we only own 20 to 50% of a company?
Equity Method
Use the Equity Method If we bought 20% of Company E, we get 20% of Company Es net income
Ignore Company Es stock price
Company E is worth $100, we pay $20
Balance sheet itemInvestment in Company E: $20
If Company E reports $10 of net income, we get 20% of that $2
Investment in Company goes up by $2 (Debit)
Investment income goes up by $2 (Credit)
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
22/41
21
Short Term Investments
Investments
Short-term investments with less than 20% control Also known as investments held for trading
Mark-to-market
Unrealized gains or losses flow straight to Net Income
Long Term Investments
Long-term investments with less than 20% control
Also known as investments available for sale
Unrealized gains or losses flow through Other Comprehensive Income (OCI)
Only flows through net income after investment is sold
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
23/41
22
What is comparable companies analysis?
Comparable Companies Analysis
Looking at similar companies and seeing how they are valued on a multiples basis
Common multiples include EV / EBITDA, EV / Revenue, P / B
Taking the average (median) multiple
e.g. 6.0x EV / EBITDA
Apply to target companys metric to get implied valuation
Target companys EBITDA is $5 mm
6.0 x $5 mm = $30 mm implied enterprise value
Valuing a house
Similar to valuing a house
Look at how much surrounding houses are worth relative to square feet (or other metric)
Find median price-to-square feet multiple
Apply this multiple to number of square feet in target house to get implied valuation
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
24/41
23
Issues?
Comparable Companies Analysis
Are mansions comparable to normal houses?
Size must be comparable
What other features might affect how much houses are worth?
Number of garage doors?
Number of bedrooms? Bathrooms?
Furnished?
Should price-to-square-feet be the only multiple?
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
25/41
24
Pros
Comparable Companies Analysis
Market-based valuation
DCFs often do not reflect short-term market conditions
Reflects market trends: poor marketlower multipleslower implied value
Useful when a DCF is impossible or hard to do
IPO
Private companies with limited information
Minority investments
Shortcut to a DCF
Assume comparables are valued efficiently by the market in a DCF fashion
If every house around you has been appraised, do you really need an appraisal?
Less room for manipulation compared to DCF
Provides a benchmark value based on similar companies
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
26/41
25
Cons
Comparable Companies Analysis
Does not account for synergies or control premiums in M&A analysis
Doesnt explain market inefficiencies
If market is irrational, then valuation may be irrational
Difficult to find comparable companies
e.g. Facebook
May not accurately reflect intrinsic value in small-cap, thinly traded stocks
Disconnect from companys projected cash flows
Ignores company specific issues
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
27/41
26
Using the Quick Comps Capital IQ feature
Comparable Companies Analysis
Background Situation Solution Implementation
1. Select company in Capital IQ search bar
2. Select Quick Comps
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
28/41
27
Using the Quick Comps Capital IQ feature
Comparable Companies Analysis
1. Scrutinize automatically generated list of comparables
2. Add and delete companies
Delete
Add
Export toExcel
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
29/41
28
Using Bloomberg to build comps
Comparable Companies Analysis
1. Select company
2. Type in: RV (stands for relative valuation)
3. Add and delete companies to the list
4. Go to Edit Comparables if you want to add different columns (e.g. P / NAV)
5. Export to Excel
6. If file is saved on the same computer, file will automatically update
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
30/41
29
Complete Process
Comparable Companies Analysis
1. Select the universe of comparable companies
Competitors, look at research reports
Pull research reports from Bloomberg / Capital IQ
2. Locate the necessary financial information
Canada: Pull annual / quarterly reports from SEDAR, pull investor presentations
United States: Pull 10Ks / 8Ks from EDGAR
Research reports / Factset / Bloomberg for forward estimates
3. Spread key statistics, ratios, and trading multiples
Measure profitability, growth, returns and credit strength
4. Benchmark the comparable companies
Scrutinize list of companies, delete ones that are not comparable
5. Determine valuation
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
31/41
30
Selecting your universe of comparables
Comparable Companies Analysis
Make sure companies have similar traits in the following areas
Industry Products Businessis this a pure play? Locationdifferent tax codes Cyclicality Customers
Distribution channels
Operational Financial
Size Leverage Projected growth Risk profile Shareholder base
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
32/41
31
Valuation
Comparable Companies Analysis
Current % of Enterprise Value /
Share 52-wk. Equity Enterprise LTM 2013E LTM 2013E LTM 2013E
Company Ticker Price High Value Value Sales Sales EBITDA EBITDA EBIT EBIT
Best Buy Co. Inc BBY:NYSE 18.24$ 64% 6,238$ 6,723$ 0.1x 0.1x 2.6x 2.6x 3.1x 3.9x
Comparables
Radioshack RSH:NYSE 2.79$ 20% 288$ 450$ 0.1x 0.1x 4.6x 3.7x 20.7x 16.5x
Gamestop GME:NYSE 23.15$ 87% 2,673$ 2,535$ 0.3x 0.3x 3.4x 3.3x 4.4x 4.3x
Target TGT:NYSE 64.67$ 74% 42,351$ 58,673$ 0.8x 0.8x 7.9x 7.7x 11.0x 10.9x
Wal-Mart Stores WMT:NYSE 74.50$ 99% 251,537$ 254,048$ 0.6x 0.9x 7.3x 6.7x 9.6x 8.7x
Mean 0.4x 0.5x 5.8x 5.3x 11.4x 10.1x
Median 0.4x 0.5x 6.0x 5.2x 10.3x 9.8x
High 0.8x 0.9x 7.9x 7.7x 20.7x 16.5x
Low 0.1x 0.1x 3.4x 3.3x 4.4x 4.3x
How can we find implied value? Take median multiple (e.g. EV / LTM Sales, EV / 13E EBITDA) Multiply with BestBuys corresponding metric (e.g. LTM Sales, 13E EBITDA) Valuation typically presented in a range
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
33/41
32
Issues?
Comparable Companies Analysis
Current % of Enterprise Value /
Share 52-wk. Equity Enterprise LTM 2013E LTM 2013E LTM 2013E
Company Ticker Price High Value Value Sales Sales EBITDA EBITDA EBIT EBIT
Best Buy Co. Inc BBY:NYSE 18.24$ 64% 6,238$ 6,723$ 0.1x 0.1x 2.6x 2.6x 3.1x 3.9x
Comparables
Radioshack RSH:NYSE 2.79$ 20% 288$ 450$ 0.1x 0.1x 4.6x 3.7x 20.7x 16.5x
Gamestop GME:NYSE 23.15$ 87% 2,673$ 2,535$ 0.3x 0.3x 3.4x 3.3x 4.4x 4.3x
Target TGT:NYSE 64.67$ 74% 42,351$ 58,673$ 0.8x 0.8x 7.9x 7.7x 11.0x 10.9x
Wal-Mart Stores WMT:NYSE 74.50$ 99% 251,537$ 254,048$ 0.6x 0.9x 7.3x 6.7x 9.6x 8.7x
Mean 0.4x 0.5x 5.8x 5.3x 11.4x 10.1x
Median 0.4x 0.5x 6.0x 5.2x 10.3x 9.8x
High 0.8x 0.9x 7.9x 7.7x 20.7x 16.5x
Low 0.1x 0.1x 3.4x 3.3x 4.4x 4.3x
Are these companies really comparable with BestBuy? Sometimes it is difficult to find truly comparable companies
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
34/41
33
Establishing Multiple Range
Comparable Companies Analysis
HighLow
Note: this example is unrelated to the BestBuy example
4.0x
ClosestComparable A
5.0x
ClosestComparable C
6.0x 7.0x
ClosestComparable A
6.5x
Median Mean
Selected Multiple Range
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
35/41
34
EV / EBITDA Valuation
Comparables Valuation
Establish EV / EBITDA range from comparables
Decide range by analyzing closest comparables, median, mean, high and low
Build range for LTM, 2012E, and 2013E
Multiply to companys EBITDA (LTM, 2012E and 2013E)
Arrive at Implied Enterprise Value range
Less: Net Debt (DebtCash)
Assume no minority interest or preferred equity in this case
Arrive at Implied Equity Value
Divide by Fully Diluted Shares Outstanding
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
Less: FullyFinancial Implied Net Implied Diluted Implied
EBITDA Metric Multiple Range Enterprise Value Debt Equity Value Shares Share Price
LTM 50 10.0x - 13.0x $500 - $650 ($100) $400 - $550 100 $4.00 - $5.50
2012E 55 9.0x - 12.0x 495 - 660 ($100) 395 - 560 100 3.95 - 5.60
2013E 80 8.0x - 11.0x 640 - 880 ($100) 540 - 780 100 5.40 - 7.80
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
36/41
35
Similar to comps, but focused on transactions
Precedents Transactions
Comparable transaction analysis
Looks at historical transactions
Similar multiples, but EV is based on EV paid as opposed to market-implied EV
EV Paid / EBITDA, EV Paid / Revenue
Valuation derived from precedents will typically be higher than comparables and DCF
because of control premium
Control premium:
Synergies
Ability to control timing of cash flows
Ability to change management, improve business
Precedents are similar to valuing your house based on how much surrounding houses
were bought for on a price-to-square-feet basis
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
37/41
36
Precedents Example
Precedents Transactions
Enterprise Value / LTM Equity Value / Premiums Paid
Date Transaction Purchase Equity Enterprise LTM L TM LTM EBITDA LTM Days Prior to Unaffected
Announce d Acquire r Ta rge t Type Conside ra tion Va lue Va lue Sa le s EBITDA EBIT Ma rgin Ne t Income 1 7 30
03/11/2010 A K Public / Public Cash $1,600 $1,900 1.5x 8.0x 9.1x 18% 13.6x 30% 27% 33%
30/10/2010 B L Public / Public Cash / Stock 900 1,200 1.2x 7.6x 8.7x 16% 13.9x 29% 32% 31%
22/06/2010 C M Public / Private Cash 600 800 1.1x 7.1x 8.1x 15% 12.0x NA NA NA
15/04/2010 D N Public / Public Stock 1,300 1,350 1.6x 8.5x 12.5x 19% 14.4x 29% 36% 34%
01/10/2009 E O Sponsor /
Private
Cash 200 250 1.3x 7.7x 9.2x 17% 13.3x NA NA NA
01/07/2009 F P Public / Public Stock 2,800 3,000 1.4x 8.0x 10.7x 18% 17.7x 33% 31% 36%
06/07/2008 G Q Sponsor /
Public
Cash 1,600 2,000 1.2x 7.5x 9.3x 15% 12.4x 38% 42% 43%
09/11/2008 H R Sponsor /
Public
Cash 900 950 1.2x 7.3x 8.3x 16% 13.1x 34% 35% 36%
21/06/2008 I S Sponsor /
Public
Cash 1,300 1,800 1.0x 7.2x 8.3x 13% 16.0x 35% 37% 39%
20/03/2007 J T Public / Private Cash 370 600 0.9x 6.5x 8.1x 14% 10.6x NA NA NA
Mean 1.2x 7.5x 9.2x 16% 13.7x 33% 34% 36%
Median 1.2x 7.5x 8.9x 16% 13.4x 33% 35% 36%
High 1.6x 8.5x 12.5x 19% 17.7x 38% 42% 43%Low 0.9x 6.5x 8.1x 13% 10.6x 29% 27% 31%
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
38/41
37
Pros
Precedents Transactions
Market-based
Based on actual acquisition multiples paid for comparable companies
Recent transactions reflect current market trends, economic conditions, etc.
Simple to use
Recent, key transactions provide a benchmark acquisition multiples
Objective
Based on actual acquisitions, does not make assumptions about the future
Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
39/41
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
40/41
39 More Multiples
Resource
P / NAV: used in mining and energy NAV is a DCF on each of a
companys assets, using a different
discount rate for each project
EV / Production
Measured in BOE / day (barrels of
oil equivalent) or Tonnes / day
(metric tons)
EV / Reserves
EV / Proven Reserves (1P)
EV / Proven + Probable (2P)
1P90%, 2P50%, 3P10%
Finance / Real Estate
P / B and P / E for banks
EV / AUM for asset management firms
AUM = Assets Under Management
EV / FFO for REITs
FFO = Funds from Operations
Net Income + D&A
EV / AFFO
AFFO = Adjusted Funds from Ops
FFO + Rent Increases + Certain
CAPEX Items
-
8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1
41/41
40 More Multiples
Tech
EV / Registered Users EV / Pageviews
EV / Unique Visitors
EV / Subscribers
Retail
EV / Square Feet of Retail EV / EBITDAR
Add back rent to EBITDA
Some retail firms choose to rent,
others choose to buy stores
EBITDAR does not penalize retail
firms for rentingAirlines
EV / Planes
EV / Passengers