Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

download Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

of 41

Transcript of Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    1/41

    Comparables Analysis and

    Precedents Transactions

    November 3, 2012

    Joshua Jia | Instructor / CEOJules Koifman | InstructorAlexander Banh | CSO

    In partnership with the

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    2/41

    Preparing for finance recruiting isnt just skimming The Vault anymore. Studentsshould study for recruiting like a course anddo their homework, because the finalexam is the interview. VP, recruiter for Queens

    Like a course, there should be: Homework: regular readings are necessary Practice (mock interviews) Comprehensive, accessible resources for all interested students

    The most important exam of any Commerce students life

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

    Recruiting1

    Finance Interview Preparation Workshops

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    3/41

    Candidates differentiate themselves by knowing hard M&A and LBO questions

    Queens needs to offer comprehensive resources to continue being competitive

    Further Queens Commerces reputation as a career-minded institution

    6 Sessions: Saturdays at 4 p.m., Thursdays at 7 p.m.: November 3November 22

    1. Comparables Analysis and Precedent Transactions2. Discounted Cash Flows and Accounting3. Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A)4. Leveraged Buyouts (LBO)

    5. Market Questions6. Fit / Deals / Networking

    Finance Interview Preparation Workshops

    Limestone Capital Offering2

    Rationale

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    4/41

    3

    Information Sessions

    The Process

    Second week of November Look professional Meet people, get business cards or remember names, follow up Dont ask fluffy, general questions just for the sake of asking them

    If you ask generic questions, you will get generic answers Ask about the business, deals, what they like about working at X firm

    Interviews

    First rounds: third or fourth week of November 80% technical

    Final rounds: fourth week of November or first week of December

    Mostly fit The dinner Be ready for exploding offers

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    5/41

    4

    Capital Markets

    Jobs in Capital Markets

    Industry Groups:

    Metals & Mining (BMO) Financials TMT (CIBC) Real Estate (TD,

    Brookfield) Healthcare Consumer Infrastructure Diversified Oil & Gas (Calgary)

    Product Groups

    M&A Equity Capital Markets Debt Capital Markets Syndication Restructuring

    Investment Banking Equity Research Sales & Trading

    Groups:

    Equity Fixed Income Economic Quantitative

    Sovereign

    Groups:

    Equity Fixed Income Derivatives Currencies

    Automated Trading Asset-Backed

    Securities

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    6/41

    5

    How is Enterprise Value calculated?

    Enterprise Value

    Two ways to think about Enterprise Value (EV)

    Value of the firm: both debt and equity

    Theoretical takeover price (no control premium)

    Enterprise Value = Market Cap. + Preferred Equity + Minority Interest + Debt - Cash

    Why do we use Enterprise Value?

    Market cap. only measures the equity value

    Ignores debt and preferred shares

    Enterprise value represents the value of the firm to both debt and equity holders

    The market value of all capitalinvested in the business

    Multiples using EV are more comparable

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    7/41

    6

    Why do we subtract cash?

    Enterprise Value

    Imagine buying a company that consisted of the following: Piggy bank with $99 inside

    The piggy is worth $1

    EV represents the theoretical takeover price

    Let the owner keep the $99, pay $1 for the piggy

    Buying cash with cash is redundant, so we net it out

    Paying off debt with cash

    If a company only has $10 of debt and $10 of cash on its balance sheet, it has an

    Enterprise Value of zero You can pay off the $10 of debt with $10 of cash; this company is worthless

    Debt - Cash = Net Debt

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    8/41

    7 Enterprise Value

    Why do we add preferred equity?

    In accounting, equity refers to both common and preferred equity

    In finance, equity value (market cap.) only consists of common shares

    Preferred equity is treated more like debt

    Price doesnt move much, dividends are like interest

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    9/41

    8

    What are multiples?

    Multiples

    When we buy stock, we are paying to own a piece of a companys cash flows Although we dont receive the cash, market price should adjust to reflect changes

    in expectations of these projected cash flows

    Multiples: how much the market is valuing a company relative to the value

    stakeholders are receiving, e.g. how much cash that company is generating

    How long before I get my money back?

    Assume price to earnings ratio of 5

    Paying $5 for $1 of earnings

    5 years before those earnings add up to original price paid

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    10/41

    9 Common Multiples

    Equity Multiples

    Price / Earnings: how much are

    shareholders paying for $1 of earnings?

    Price / Book: how much are

    shareholders paying for $1 of equity

    book value?

    Book represents book value of

    equity per share

    Price / Tangible Book Value

    Tangible Book Value does not

    include intangible assets like

    patents and Goodwill

    Price / Cash Flow

    Operating cash flow per share

    Enterprise Multiples

    Enterprise Value (EV) / EBITDA: how

    much are stakeholders (both

    bondholders and shareholders) paying

    for $1 of EBITDA generation?

    EV / EBIT

    EV / Revenue

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    11/41

    10 Forward Multiples

    Valuing future growth vs. historical growth

    Historical last twelve months (LTM) vs. projected next twelve months (NTM)

    Historical multiples include EV / LTM EBITDA, EV / LTM Revenue, and Price / LTM EPS

    Forward multiples include EV / NTM EBITDA, EV / NTM Revenue and Price / NTM EPS

    Price / Earnings-to-Growth

    Known as PEG

    Price / Earnings Ratio

    Annual EPS Growth

    Most people prefer forward multiples because it accounts for projected growth

    LTM results may be a poor proxy for projected growth because of:

    One-time charges

    Tax (NOLs)

    Past Futurecircumstances have changed

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    12/41

    11

    Multiples must be consistent

    Apples-to-Apples

    Numerator / Denominator must be the same unit

    Dividing kilometers by miles is not meaningful

    Apples-to-Apples vs. Apples-to-Oranges

    Equity value metrics and enterprise value metrics are different

    Value to shareholders vs. value to ALL stakeholders (shareholders, bondholders,preferred shareholders)

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    13/41

    12

    Multiples must be consistent

    Apples-to-Apples

    Price / Revenue is not meaningful

    Price represents the market value of equityholdersholdings

    Revenue goes to ALL stakeholders

    EV / Earnings is not meaningful

    Enterprise value represents the value of the entire firm

    Earnings represents value to shareholderssince interest has been deducted

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    14/41

    13

    Why is EV / EBITDA generally better than P / E?

    EV / EBITDA vs. P / E

    P / E is an equity metric, while EV / EBITDA is an enterprise metric

    P / E only looks at equity portion, ignores debt / preferred shareholders

    P / E is not capital structure neutral

    P / E is highly dependent on leverage

    More debt

    more risk to shareholders

    shareholders demand lower P / E

    Even if debt is cheaper than equity, the P / E metric will penalize companies who

    choose to finance through debt

    Using P / E to value companies violates M&M theory

    EV / EBITDA is capital structure neutral

    The mix of equity and debt does not change EV assuming similar cost of capital

    Doesnt matter how you slice the pie, total EV is the same

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    15/41

    14

    What are some issues with using earnings?

    Earnings vs. EBITDA

    Earnings are subject to manipulation, one-time charges, differing accounting policies,

    non-cash expenses, and ambiguity

    e.g. Enron

    Why do we like EBITDA?

    EBITDA is more similar to cash flow and is capital structure neutral

    Less room for manipulation

    Ignores D&A, a non-cash expense

    Ignores interest expense; EBITDA is available to shareholders, bondholders, and

    preferred shareholders

    EBITDA is a proxy for cash flow available to all stakeholders

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    16/41

    15

    When is P / E better than EV / EBITDA?

    Advantages of P / E

    If interest is a part of a companys cost of doing business

    Banks, financial institutions

    Financial

    If companies in the industry have negligible amounts of debt

    Tech companies

    Junior mining companies

    Volatile businesses (e.g. startups)

    If you are valuing a minority investment

    Equity investments with

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    17/41

    16

    What is minority interest?

    Minority Interest

    Also known as non-controlling interest If we own more than 50% of a subsidiary, we consolidate our financial statements with

    the subsidiarys

    Even if we own only 51% of Company S, 100% of Company Ss income statement line

    items are added to our income statement line items

    However, only 51% of Company Ss balance sheet line items are added to our

    balance sheet items

    49% of Company Ss net assets (assetsliabilities) go into minority interest

    Minority interest is the part of a subsidiary that we dont own

    Found in equity section of balance sheet (IFRS)

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    18/41

    17

    How do we consolidate the parent and subsidiary?

    Minority Interest

    Parent Corp.

    -Income Statement

    -Balance Sheet

    Subsidiary Corp.

    -Income Statement

    -Balance Sheet

    Consolidated Entity

    (Reported by Parent Corporation) Combined Balance Sheet, line-by-line Combined Income Statement, line-by-line Eliminate things like

    inter-company gains and losses inter-company balances (Assets/Liabilities) Parents investment in the subsidiary company

    Minority interest reported (the percent of the subsidiary not owned by theparent) on both statements

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    19/41

    18

    Why do we add minority interest to get Enterprise Value?

    Minority Interest

    EV = Market Cap + Preferred Equity + DebtCash + Minority Interest In enterprise multiples, EV is the numerator, and an income statement line item is

    often the denominator

    Denominator: Income statement line items are consolidated and include 100% of the

    subsidiarys (Company S) income statement line items

    Numerator:Market Cap + Preferred Equity + Debt accounts for 51% of Company S

    The 49% we dont own is not factored into the prices of the parents stock,

    bonds, or preferred shares

    To make the numerator consistent with the denominator, we add in the 49% of

    Company S we dont own (minority interest)

    To make multiples like EV / EBITDA, EV / EBIT and EV / Revenue an apples-to-

    apples comparison, we add minority interest

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    20/41

    19

    EV / EBITDA Apples-to-Apples

    Minority Interest

    Market Capitalization + Minority Interest + Preferred Equity + DebtCash

    Add the portion of the subsidiary we dont ownso numerator and denominator are consistent

    Enterprise Value

    EBITDA

    subsidiary consolidated byadding minority interest

    subsidiary consolidated

    from accounting rules

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    21/41

    20

    What if we only own 20 to 50% of a company?

    Equity Method

    Use the Equity Method If we bought 20% of Company E, we get 20% of Company Es net income

    Ignore Company Es stock price

    Company E is worth $100, we pay $20

    Balance sheet itemInvestment in Company E: $20

    If Company E reports $10 of net income, we get 20% of that $2

    Investment in Company goes up by $2 (Debit)

    Investment income goes up by $2 (Credit)

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    22/41

    21

    Short Term Investments

    Investments

    Short-term investments with less than 20% control Also known as investments held for trading

    Mark-to-market

    Unrealized gains or losses flow straight to Net Income

    Long Term Investments

    Long-term investments with less than 20% control

    Also known as investments available for sale

    Unrealized gains or losses flow through Other Comprehensive Income (OCI)

    Only flows through net income after investment is sold

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    23/41

    22

    What is comparable companies analysis?

    Comparable Companies Analysis

    Looking at similar companies and seeing how they are valued on a multiples basis

    Common multiples include EV / EBITDA, EV / Revenue, P / B

    Taking the average (median) multiple

    e.g. 6.0x EV / EBITDA

    Apply to target companys metric to get implied valuation

    Target companys EBITDA is $5 mm

    6.0 x $5 mm = $30 mm implied enterprise value

    Valuing a house

    Similar to valuing a house

    Look at how much surrounding houses are worth relative to square feet (or other metric)

    Find median price-to-square feet multiple

    Apply this multiple to number of square feet in target house to get implied valuation

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    24/41

    23

    Issues?

    Comparable Companies Analysis

    Are mansions comparable to normal houses?

    Size must be comparable

    What other features might affect how much houses are worth?

    Number of garage doors?

    Number of bedrooms? Bathrooms?

    Furnished?

    Should price-to-square-feet be the only multiple?

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    25/41

    24

    Pros

    Comparable Companies Analysis

    Market-based valuation

    DCFs often do not reflect short-term market conditions

    Reflects market trends: poor marketlower multipleslower implied value

    Useful when a DCF is impossible or hard to do

    IPO

    Private companies with limited information

    Minority investments

    Shortcut to a DCF

    Assume comparables are valued efficiently by the market in a DCF fashion

    If every house around you has been appraised, do you really need an appraisal?

    Less room for manipulation compared to DCF

    Provides a benchmark value based on similar companies

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    26/41

    25

    Cons

    Comparable Companies Analysis

    Does not account for synergies or control premiums in M&A analysis

    Doesnt explain market inefficiencies

    If market is irrational, then valuation may be irrational

    Difficult to find comparable companies

    e.g. Facebook

    May not accurately reflect intrinsic value in small-cap, thinly traded stocks

    Disconnect from companys projected cash flows

    Ignores company specific issues

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    27/41

    26

    Using the Quick Comps Capital IQ feature

    Comparable Companies Analysis

    Background Situation Solution Implementation

    1. Select company in Capital IQ search bar

    2. Select Quick Comps

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    28/41

    27

    Using the Quick Comps Capital IQ feature

    Comparable Companies Analysis

    1. Scrutinize automatically generated list of comparables

    2. Add and delete companies

    Delete

    Add

    Export toExcel

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    29/41

    28

    Using Bloomberg to build comps

    Comparable Companies Analysis

    1. Select company

    2. Type in: RV (stands for relative valuation)

    3. Add and delete companies to the list

    4. Go to Edit Comparables if you want to add different columns (e.g. P / NAV)

    5. Export to Excel

    6. If file is saved on the same computer, file will automatically update

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    30/41

    29

    Complete Process

    Comparable Companies Analysis

    1. Select the universe of comparable companies

    Competitors, look at research reports

    Pull research reports from Bloomberg / Capital IQ

    2. Locate the necessary financial information

    Canada: Pull annual / quarterly reports from SEDAR, pull investor presentations

    United States: Pull 10Ks / 8Ks from EDGAR

    Research reports / Factset / Bloomberg for forward estimates

    3. Spread key statistics, ratios, and trading multiples

    Measure profitability, growth, returns and credit strength

    4. Benchmark the comparable companies

    Scrutinize list of companies, delete ones that are not comparable

    5. Determine valuation

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    31/41

    30

    Selecting your universe of comparables

    Comparable Companies Analysis

    Make sure companies have similar traits in the following areas

    Industry Products Businessis this a pure play? Locationdifferent tax codes Cyclicality Customers

    Distribution channels

    Operational Financial

    Size Leverage Projected growth Risk profile Shareholder base

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    32/41

    31

    Valuation

    Comparable Companies Analysis

    Current % of Enterprise Value /

    Share 52-wk. Equity Enterprise LTM 2013E LTM 2013E LTM 2013E

    Company Ticker Price High Value Value Sales Sales EBITDA EBITDA EBIT EBIT

    Best Buy Co. Inc BBY:NYSE 18.24$ 64% 6,238$ 6,723$ 0.1x 0.1x 2.6x 2.6x 3.1x 3.9x

    Comparables

    Radioshack RSH:NYSE 2.79$ 20% 288$ 450$ 0.1x 0.1x 4.6x 3.7x 20.7x 16.5x

    Gamestop GME:NYSE 23.15$ 87% 2,673$ 2,535$ 0.3x 0.3x 3.4x 3.3x 4.4x 4.3x

    Target TGT:NYSE 64.67$ 74% 42,351$ 58,673$ 0.8x 0.8x 7.9x 7.7x 11.0x 10.9x

    Wal-Mart Stores WMT:NYSE 74.50$ 99% 251,537$ 254,048$ 0.6x 0.9x 7.3x 6.7x 9.6x 8.7x

    Mean 0.4x 0.5x 5.8x 5.3x 11.4x 10.1x

    Median 0.4x 0.5x 6.0x 5.2x 10.3x 9.8x

    High 0.8x 0.9x 7.9x 7.7x 20.7x 16.5x

    Low 0.1x 0.1x 3.4x 3.3x 4.4x 4.3x

    How can we find implied value? Take median multiple (e.g. EV / LTM Sales, EV / 13E EBITDA) Multiply with BestBuys corresponding metric (e.g. LTM Sales, 13E EBITDA) Valuation typically presented in a range

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    33/41

    32

    Issues?

    Comparable Companies Analysis

    Current % of Enterprise Value /

    Share 52-wk. Equity Enterprise LTM 2013E LTM 2013E LTM 2013E

    Company Ticker Price High Value Value Sales Sales EBITDA EBITDA EBIT EBIT

    Best Buy Co. Inc BBY:NYSE 18.24$ 64% 6,238$ 6,723$ 0.1x 0.1x 2.6x 2.6x 3.1x 3.9x

    Comparables

    Radioshack RSH:NYSE 2.79$ 20% 288$ 450$ 0.1x 0.1x 4.6x 3.7x 20.7x 16.5x

    Gamestop GME:NYSE 23.15$ 87% 2,673$ 2,535$ 0.3x 0.3x 3.4x 3.3x 4.4x 4.3x

    Target TGT:NYSE 64.67$ 74% 42,351$ 58,673$ 0.8x 0.8x 7.9x 7.7x 11.0x 10.9x

    Wal-Mart Stores WMT:NYSE 74.50$ 99% 251,537$ 254,048$ 0.6x 0.9x 7.3x 6.7x 9.6x 8.7x

    Mean 0.4x 0.5x 5.8x 5.3x 11.4x 10.1x

    Median 0.4x 0.5x 6.0x 5.2x 10.3x 9.8x

    High 0.8x 0.9x 7.9x 7.7x 20.7x 16.5x

    Low 0.1x 0.1x 3.4x 3.3x 4.4x 4.3x

    Are these companies really comparable with BestBuy? Sometimes it is difficult to find truly comparable companies

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    34/41

    33

    Establishing Multiple Range

    Comparable Companies Analysis

    HighLow

    Note: this example is unrelated to the BestBuy example

    4.0x

    ClosestComparable A

    5.0x

    ClosestComparable C

    6.0x 7.0x

    ClosestComparable A

    6.5x

    Median Mean

    Selected Multiple Range

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    35/41

    34

    EV / EBITDA Valuation

    Comparables Valuation

    Establish EV / EBITDA range from comparables

    Decide range by analyzing closest comparables, median, mean, high and low

    Build range for LTM, 2012E, and 2013E

    Multiply to companys EBITDA (LTM, 2012E and 2013E)

    Arrive at Implied Enterprise Value range

    Less: Net Debt (DebtCash)

    Assume no minority interest or preferred equity in this case

    Arrive at Implied Equity Value

    Divide by Fully Diluted Shares Outstanding

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

    Less: FullyFinancial Implied Net Implied Diluted Implied

    EBITDA Metric Multiple Range Enterprise Value Debt Equity Value Shares Share Price

    LTM 50 10.0x - 13.0x $500 - $650 ($100) $400 - $550 100 $4.00 - $5.50

    2012E 55 9.0x - 12.0x 495 - 660 ($100) 395 - 560 100 3.95 - 5.60

    2013E 80 8.0x - 11.0x 640 - 880 ($100) 540 - 780 100 5.40 - 7.80

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    36/41

    35

    Similar to comps, but focused on transactions

    Precedents Transactions

    Comparable transaction analysis

    Looks at historical transactions

    Similar multiples, but EV is based on EV paid as opposed to market-implied EV

    EV Paid / EBITDA, EV Paid / Revenue

    Valuation derived from precedents will typically be higher than comparables and DCF

    because of control premium

    Control premium:

    Synergies

    Ability to control timing of cash flows

    Ability to change management, improve business

    Precedents are similar to valuing your house based on how much surrounding houses

    were bought for on a price-to-square-feet basis

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    37/41

    36

    Precedents Example

    Precedents Transactions

    Enterprise Value / LTM Equity Value / Premiums Paid

    Date Transaction Purchase Equity Enterprise LTM L TM LTM EBITDA LTM Days Prior to Unaffected

    Announce d Acquire r Ta rge t Type Conside ra tion Va lue Va lue Sa le s EBITDA EBIT Ma rgin Ne t Income 1 7 30

    03/11/2010 A K Public / Public Cash $1,600 $1,900 1.5x 8.0x 9.1x 18% 13.6x 30% 27% 33%

    30/10/2010 B L Public / Public Cash / Stock 900 1,200 1.2x 7.6x 8.7x 16% 13.9x 29% 32% 31%

    22/06/2010 C M Public / Private Cash 600 800 1.1x 7.1x 8.1x 15% 12.0x NA NA NA

    15/04/2010 D N Public / Public Stock 1,300 1,350 1.6x 8.5x 12.5x 19% 14.4x 29% 36% 34%

    01/10/2009 E O Sponsor /

    Private

    Cash 200 250 1.3x 7.7x 9.2x 17% 13.3x NA NA NA

    01/07/2009 F P Public / Public Stock 2,800 3,000 1.4x 8.0x 10.7x 18% 17.7x 33% 31% 36%

    06/07/2008 G Q Sponsor /

    Public

    Cash 1,600 2,000 1.2x 7.5x 9.3x 15% 12.4x 38% 42% 43%

    09/11/2008 H R Sponsor /

    Public

    Cash 900 950 1.2x 7.3x 8.3x 16% 13.1x 34% 35% 36%

    21/06/2008 I S Sponsor /

    Public

    Cash 1,300 1,800 1.0x 7.2x 8.3x 13% 16.0x 35% 37% 39%

    20/03/2007 J T Public / Private Cash 370 600 0.9x 6.5x 8.1x 14% 10.6x NA NA NA

    Mean 1.2x 7.5x 9.2x 16% 13.7x 33% 34% 36%

    Median 1.2x 7.5x 8.9x 16% 13.4x 33% 35% 36%

    High 1.6x 8.5x 12.5x 19% 17.7x 38% 42% 43%Low 0.9x 6.5x 8.1x 13% 10.6x 29% 27% 31%

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    38/41

    37

    Pros

    Precedents Transactions

    Market-based

    Based on actual acquisition multiples paid for comparable companies

    Recent transactions reflect current market trends, economic conditions, etc.

    Simple to use

    Recent, key transactions provide a benchmark acquisition multiples

    Objective

    Based on actual acquisitions, does not make assumptions about the future

    Introduction Enterprise Comparables Precedents

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    39/41

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    40/41

    39 More Multiples

    Resource

    P / NAV: used in mining and energy NAV is a DCF on each of a

    companys assets, using a different

    discount rate for each project

    EV / Production

    Measured in BOE / day (barrels of

    oil equivalent) or Tonnes / day

    (metric tons)

    EV / Reserves

    EV / Proven Reserves (1P)

    EV / Proven + Probable (2P)

    1P90%, 2P50%, 3P10%

    Finance / Real Estate

    P / B and P / E for banks

    EV / AUM for asset management firms

    AUM = Assets Under Management

    EV / FFO for REITs

    FFO = Funds from Operations

    Net Income + D&A

    EV / AFFO

    AFFO = Adjusted Funds from Ops

    FFO + Rent Increases + Certain

    CAPEX Items

  • 8/9/2019 Class 1 Comparables and Precedents1

    41/41

    40 More Multiples

    Tech

    EV / Registered Users EV / Pageviews

    EV / Unique Visitors

    EV / Subscribers

    Retail

    EV / Square Feet of Retail EV / EBITDAR

    Add back rent to EBITDA

    Some retail firms choose to rent,

    others choose to buy stores

    EBITDAR does not penalize retail

    firms for rentingAirlines

    EV / Planes

    EV / Passengers