CIPS South West Wales Branch Event uploads/… · Tracking the Journey to Best Practice ......
Transcript of CIPS South West Wales Branch Event uploads/… · Tracking the Journey to Best Practice ......
Consultancy Negotiation Skills Development Recruitment Interim Management Asia Sourcing © PMMS Consulting Group 2008 All Rights Reserved www.pmms-group.com
+44(0)1253 795177
CIPS South West Wales Branch
Benchmarking – Learning from Experience
Presented by:
Dave Porter
© PMMS Consulting Group 2005/JR2755 Consultancy Negotiation Skills Development Recruitment Strategic Proposals 2
How do you measure ‘performance’?
The 3 ways of assessing purchasing performance:
1: INPUTSManpower, transaction levels, costs
2: OUTPUTSPrices, quality, service levels
3: PROCESS & PRACTICEComparing how purchasing is undertaken versus best practice
© PMMS Consulting Group 2005/JR2755 Consultancy Negotiation Skills Development Recruitment Strategic Proposals 3
How do you measure ‘performance’?1: INPUTS
Relatively easy to do but …..
i Tactical information
i Focuses upon operating cost…a very small proportion of total purchasing spend
i Limited - emphasis on cost and efficiency not contribution
i Often sponsored by those with little interest or insight into the strategic role of Procurement
Purchasing seen as essentially a tactical /administrative activity with little or no real business contribution
iHeadcount per £ million of spendiContracts handled per buyer per yeariCost of Function as % of spendiTime taken to satisfy a requisition
© PMMS Consulting Group 2005/JR2755 Consultancy Negotiation Skills Development Recruitment Strategic Proposals 4
How do you measure ‘performance’?
2: OUTPUTS
Better than ‘Inputs’ but ……….
i‘Rear view mirror’
iVery limited in response to real business needs
iDilutes effort through unproductive time in justifying ‘our’ performance
iDoes not help identify opportunities
Does not address: ‘How good are we?’ and ‘How can we improve?’
i Savings/Cost Avoidancei Qualityi Supplier service levelsi Supply base reduction/rationalisation
© PMMS Consulting Group 2005/JR2755 Consultancy Negotiation Skills Development Recruitment Strategic Proposals 5
• Emphasis is on ‘how we do things’:
• Must consider the total supply process
‘If best Procurement practice is being adopted then the best possible results will be achieved’
‘If best Procurement practice is being adopted then the best possible results will be achieved’
• Relies on an understanding of Best Practice and an ability to translate this to the context of a specific organisation
• Underlying assumption is……….
• Therefore identifies explicit opportunities and planning steps –provides a forward route map – a ‘strategic planning platform’
3: PROCESS & PRACTICE
How do you measure ‘performance’?
© PMMS Consulting Group 2005/JR2755 Consultancy Negotiation Skills Development Recruitment Strategic Proposals 6
Organisation& Internal
Relationships
PurchasingProcess & Controls
People
Contribution&
Influence
Enabling FoundationEnabling Foundation
Quality ofAnalysis
Delivery ofSustainable
Results
DifferentiatedStrategy &
Actions
Strategic Purchasing –
Quality of Process,Results &
Sustainabilityof Delivery
Permanence of Change
Delivery & SustainabilityDelivery & Sustainability
Knowledge & Systems
Technology
External RelationshipManagement
PMMS Purchasing Excellence Model
The essential building blocks which are a prerequisite for effective, strategic procurement
© PMMS Consulting Group 2005/JR2755 Consultancy Negotiation Skills Development Recruitment Strategic Proposals 7
Gap Analysis and Action Plan
Best Practice 10
1: Contribution &Influence 4.3
GAP
Gap Analysis
Lack of effective process to manage low value transactions
Rudimentary Supplier Database and lack of up to date & comprehensive supplier informationProcurement is often involved too late in
the Procurement process and is not involved in strategically significant projects
Gap Analysis
Lack of effective process to manage low value transactions
Rudimentary Supplier Database and lack of up to date & comprehensive supplier informationProcurement is often involved too late in
the Procurement process and is not involved in strategically significant projects
0
Action Plan
ResponsibilitiesMilestonesResource requirementsCosts and benefitsRisk managementTargets
Action Plan
ResponsibilitiesMilestonesResource requirementsCosts and benefitsRisk managementTargets
Target Score
© PMMS Consulting Group 2005/JR2755 Consultancy Negotiation Skills Development Recruitment Strategic Proposals 8
Environment Agency Benchmark Scores
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 4 8 12
Ben
chm
ark
Scor
e
1997 2001 2005 2009
36.9
50.9
62.6
Target2009
Total Benchmark Score
Enabling Foundation Score22.5
30.1
37.6
Benchmark Scores
Tracking the Journey to Best Practice
© PMMS Consulting Group 2005/JR2755 Consultancy Negotiation Skills Development Recruitment Strategic Proposals 9
Tactical Procurement
StrategicProcurement
The Impact of Strategic Procurement
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 1 2 3 4 5Time (Years)
Con
trib
utio
n
© PMMS Consulting Group 2005/JR2755 Consultancy Negotiation Skills Development Recruitment Strategic Proposals 10
Organisation& Internal
Relationships
PurchasingProcess & Controls
People
Contribution&
Influence
Enabling FoundationEnabling Foundation
Quality ofAnalysis
Delivery ofSustainable
Results
DifferentiatedStrategy &
Actions
Strategic Purchasing –
Quality of Process,Results &
Sustainabilityof Delivery
Permanence of Change
Delivery & SustainabilityDelivery & Sustainability
Knowledge & Systems
Technology
External RelationshipManagement
PMMS Purchasing Excellence Model
© PMMS Consulting Group 2005/JR2755 Consultancy Negotiation Skills Development Recruitment Strategic Proposals
Sourcing Knowledge Questionnaire - Online
• The Sourcing Knowledge Questionnaire (SKQ) is a first step tool for assessing the technical procurement knowledge of individuals, teams and companies
• It has now been undertaken by over 5000 global procurement professionals across diverse sectors and levels providing in depth benchmarking data
• It was originally developed for Coca Cola, P&O Nedlloyd and Reuters
• Original objectives– Focus development investment– Organise business and personal development priorities– Avoid a “sheep dip” approach– Benchmark for comparative and improvement baseline– Sufficiently complex to measure at multiple levels
• Subsequently used to– Evaluate impact of training interventions– As a recruitment filter– As a core element of personal development planning– As a springboard to evaluate application capability
© PMMS Consulting Group 2005/JR2755 Consultancy Negotiation Skills Development Recruitment Strategic Proposals
Sourcing Knowledge Questionnaire Total Population Summary Data
Total population 5049
supply base
analysis
risk analysis
negotiation skills
customer client
management
contractmanagement
contract selection & legal
procurement process
management
finance for procurement
supply chain
analysis
total
Benchmark/ Average 2.95 2.96 3.10 3.31 3.39 3.16 3.52 2.70 3.44 28.55
BIC (90% percentile) 3.76 3.76 4.18 4.31 4.50 4.21 4.43 3.82 4.47 37.44
Max 4.80 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.86 4.57 5.00Min 1.60 1.24 0.27 1.15 0.75 1.00 0.57 0.09 1.00
> 4 30 100 723 1025 1192 760 1362 145 1376< 3.25 3154 3109 2808 2239 1957 2793 1730 3654 1934
© PMMS Consulting Group 2005/JR2755 Consultancy Negotiation Skills Development Recruitment Strategic Proposals
Online Skills Assessment
13
Benchmark – the average of the PMMS benchmark of 5000 global procurement professionalsBest In Class – the average for the top 10% of the benchmark
>4 - shows a group area of strength< 3.25 - shows a group development need< 2.25 - shows a group significant development need
© PMMS Consulting Group 2005/JR2755 Consultancy Negotiation Skills Development Recruitment Strategic Proposals
Scores below 3.25 & 2.25
Consultancy Negotiation Skills Development Recruitment Interim Management Asia Sourcing © PMMS Consulting Group 2008 All Rights Reserved www.pmms-group.com
+44(0)1253 795177
CIPS South West Wales Branch
Benchmarking – Learning from Experience
Presented by:
Dave Porter