CHARACTERIZATION OF THE CONSTITUENT MINERAL …
Transcript of CHARACTERIZATION OF THE CONSTITUENT MINERAL …
CHARACTERIZATION OF THE CONSTITUENT MINERAL COMPONENTS OF NORTH
AFRICAN SURFACE DUST SAMPLES UTILIZING COMPUTER
CONTROLLED SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY (CCSEM)
by
ZAKARIAH EDWARD SABATKA
Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of
The University of Texas at Arlington in Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements
for the Degree of
MASTER OF SCIENCE IN EARTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON
December 2015
ii
Copyright © by Zakariah Edward Sabatka 2015
All Rights Reserved
iii
Acknowledgements This thesis could not have been accomplished without the support and guidance of many
individuals. I would like to thank my thesis advisor Dr. Andrew Hunt for his time and mentorship
during this process. A special thanks to my thesis committee Dr. James Grover and Dr. John
Wickham. Thank you Dr. Frank Oldfield and Richard Lyons from the University of Liverpool for
providing the samples which were analyzed. Thank you Zachary Sutton for the guidance and
support with the SEM and for the input into the writing of this thesis. Thank you Roy Yates for
allowing me the flexibility with my professional schedule to meet the demands of this thesis.
Most importantly I must thank my family. I would like to acknowledge and thank my
parents Scott and Wati Sabatka and my brother Rizal Sabatka for their support and
encouragement. Lastly, but certainly not least, my own nuclear family: a loving thank you to my
wife Emily and children Aedan and Alaina for carrying a heavy load on the home front during my
pursuit of higher knowledge. The three of you in my life gives me motivation to be a better person
on a daily basis.
November 17, 2015
iv
Abstract
CHARACTERIZATION OF THE CONSTITUENT MINERAL COMPONENTS OF NORTH
AFRICAN SURFACE DUST SAMPLES UTILIZING COMPUTER
CONTROLLED SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY (CCSEM)
Zakariah Edward Sabatka, MS
The University of Texas at Arlington, 2015
Supervising Professor: Andrew Hunt
Analysis of the constituent mineral components of surface dusts/soils from Chad-
Niger region, North Africa, was undertaken by computer controlled scanning electron
microscopy (CCSEM) to determine if differences in composition could be used for source
attribution to distinguish windblown material from different contributing source areas. A total
of 11 surficial samples were selected for analysis by computer controlled scanning electron
microscopy (CCSEM). These samples were from two different geographic locations in the
Chad-Niger region. CCSEM analysis generates data on individual dust particles that
includes: particle size, shape, and chemical composition. This type of particle
characterization used a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) working in the Backscattered
Electron Imaging (BEI) mode. The BEI mode of imaging of microscopic dust particles
provided information on particle morphology, and average atomic number composition.
Element data on Individual particles was provided by a Silicon Drift X-ray detector with an
ultra-thin window.
The principal goal of this project was to assess whether surface dusts, at the
individual particle level, from two different locations in the Chad-Niger region of North Africa,
could be satisfactorily differentiated. The mineralogy of the individual particles from the dust
samples was determined by CCSEM. CCSEM analysis provides data on thousands of
particles in a time efficient manner. Consequently statistically significant sized data sets can
be evaluated.
v
With surface soils/dust particles it is typically unhelpful in CCSEM analysis to define
specific mineral particle types. Certainly, obdurate minerals such as quartz can often be
recognized in CCSEM data (Particles composed wholly of Si). However, transformation
processes, like the formation of Fe coats on particles, alters the composition of basic
mineral forms in terms of the chemical composition identified in the SEM. To provide a
realistic classification of the particles analyzed here. A reference data set from the analysis
of a North African surface dust sample was used to develop a classification scheme. An
assisted cluster analysis was used to identify homogenous groups of particles within the
reference data set. Homogenous groups of particles were based on associations of the
constituent particle elements. The homogenous groups were assembled into a 59-class
element-based classification scheme. The classes were listed in a linear sorting order that
was used to classify the CCSEM data from the samples investigated in this study. The study
sample CCSEM analysis typically contained element and other data on approximately 4,000
particles per sample.
vi
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ iii
Abstract ............................................................................................................................... iv
List of Illustrations .............................................................................................................. vii
List of Tables ....................................................................................................................... x
Chapter 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1
Chapter 2 Previous Research ............................................................................................ 3
Chapter 3 Objectives and Expected Outcomes ................................................................. 7
Chapter 4 Research Design and Procedures ..................................................................... 8
Chapter 5 Results ............................................................................................................. 13
Chad Niger 2 ................................................................................................................ 17
Chad Niger 3 ................................................................................................................ 18
Chad Niger 4 ................................................................................................................ 19
Chad Niger 2 and 4 Operator assisted scanning electron microscopy analysis .......... 19
Chad Niger 9 ................................................................................................................ 30
Chad Niger 40 .............................................................................................................. 31
Chad Niger 42 .............................................................................................................. 32
Chad Niger 44 .............................................................................................................. 33
Chad Niger 45 .............................................................................................................. 34
Chad Niger 47 .............................................................................................................. 35
Chad Niger 48 .............................................................................................................. 36
Chad Niger 50 .............................................................................................................. 37
Chad Niger 48 and 50 Operator assisted scanning electron microscopy analysis ...... 42
Chapter 6 Conclusions ..................................................................................................... 60
Appendix A Tabulated Results from CCSEM Analysis .................................................... 62
References ....................................................................................................................... 64
Biographical Information ................................................................................................... 68
vii
List of Illustrations
Figure 4-1 (a) Ultrasonic Cleaning System and (b) vacuum and filter system ................................ 8
Figure 4-2 Computer Controlled Scanning Electron Microscope .................................................. 10
Figure 5-1 Chad Niger sample locations ....................................................................................... 14
Figure 5-2 Chad Niger 2 compared to the overall class averages ................................................ 17
Figure 5-3 Chad Niger 3 compared to the overall class averages ................................................ 18
Figure 5-4 Chad Niger 4 compared to overall class averages ...................................................... 19
Figure 5-5 Chad Niger 2 class 37 particle ..................................................................................... 21
Figure 5-6 Chad Niger 2 complex composition unclassified particle ............................................. 21
Figure 5-7 Chad Niger 2 class 40 particle ..................................................................................... 22
Figure 5-8 Chad Niger 2 class 8 particle ....................................................................................... 22
Figure 5-9 Chad Niger 2 complex composition unclassified particle ............................................. 23
Plate 5-10 Chad Niger 2 complex composition unclassified particle ............................................. 23
Figure 5-11 Chad Niger 2 class 47 ................................................................................................ 24
Plate 5-12 Chad Niger 2 class 1 .................................................................................................... 24
Figure 5-13 Chad Niger 2 complex composition unclassified particle ........................................... 25
Figure 5-14 Chad Niger 2 class 51 ................................................................................................ 25
Figure 5-15 Chad Niger 2 class 37 ................................................................................................ 26
Figure 5-16 Chad Niger 2 class 51 ................................................................................................ 26
Figure 5-17 Chad Niger 4 class 37 ................................................................................................ 27
Figure 5-18 Chad Niger 4 class 37 ................................................................................................ 27
Figure 5-19 Chad Niger 4 class 37 ................................................................................................ 28
Figure 5-20 Chad Niger 4 class 30 ................................................................................................ 28
Figure 5-21 Chad Niger 4 class 1 .................................................................................................. 29
Plate 5-22 Chad Niger 4 class 36 .................................................................................................. 29
Figure 5-23 Chad Niger 9 compared to overall class averages .................................................... 30
Figure 5-24 Chad Niger 40 compared to overall class averages .................................................. 31
viii
Figure 5-25 Chad Niger 42 compared to overall class averages .................................................. 32
Figure 5-26 Chad Niger 44 compared to the overall class averages ............................................ 33
Figure 5-27 Chad Niger 45 compared to the overall class averages ............................................ 34
Figure 5-28 Chad Niger 47 compared to the overall class averages ............................................ 35
Figure 5-29 Chad Niger 48 compared to the overall class averages ............................................ 36
Figure 5-30 Chad Niger 50 compared to the overall class averages ............................................ 37
Figure 5-13 Cumulative Results for 31 Chad Niger Samples across 60 classes .......................... 38
Figure 5-32 Results of the samples once a five percent cut-off was in place ............................... 39
Figure 5-33 Chad Niger 9, 40, 42, 44, 45, 47, 48, and 50 cluster ................................................. 40
Figure 5-34 Chad Niger 2 and Chad Niger 4 results with a five percent cut-off ............................ 41
Figure 5-35 Results for Chad Niger 3 using a three percent cut-off .............................................. 42
Figure 5-36 Chad Niger 48 and Chad Niger 50 with five percent cut-off ...................................... 43
Figure 5-37 Chad Niger 48 class 1 ................................................................................................ 44
Figure 5-38 Chad Niger 48 class 1 ................................................................................................ 44
Figure 5-39 Chad Niger 44 class 1 ................................................................................................ 45
Figure 5-40 Chad Niger 48 class 1 ................................................................................................ 45
Figure 5-41 Chad Niger 44 class 30 .............................................................................................. 46
Figure 5-42 Chad Niger 48 class 39 .............................................................................................. 46
Figure 5-43 Chad Niger 44 class 30 .............................................................................................. 47
Figure 5-44 Chad Niger 48 class 30 .............................................................................................. 47
Figure 5-45 Chad Niger 44 class 30 .............................................................................................. 48
Figure 5-46 Chad Niger 48 class 30 .............................................................................................. 48
Figure 5-47 Chad Niger 44 class 30 .............................................................................................. 49
Figure 5-48 Chad Niger 50 class 55 .............................................................................................. 49
Figure 5-49 Chad Niger 50 class 55 .............................................................................................. 50
Figure 5-50 Chad Niger 50 class 55 .............................................................................................. 50
Figure 5-51 Chad Niger 50 class 55 .............................................................................................. 51
Figure 5-52 Chad Niger 50 class 55 .............................................................................................. 51
ix
Figure 5-53 Chad Niger 50 class 55 .............................................................................................. 52
Figure 5-54 Chad Niger 50 class 55 .............................................................................................. 52
Figure 5-55 Chad Niger 50 class 47 elongated ............................................................................. 53
Figure 5-56 Chad Niger 50 class 47 elongated ............................................................................. 53
Figure 5-57 Chad Niger 50 class 47 elongated ............................................................................. 54
Figure 5-58 Chad Niger 50 class 47 elongated ............................................................................. 54
Figure 5-59 Chad Niger 50 class 47 .............................................................................................. 55
Figure 5-60 Chad Niger 50 class 47 .............................................................................................. 55
Figure 5-61 Chad Niger 50 class 47 .............................................................................................. 56
Figure 5-62 Chad Niger 50 class 47 .............................................................................................. 56
Figure 5-63 Chad Niger 50 class 47 .............................................................................................. 57
Figure 5-64 Chad Niger 50 class 47 .............................................................................................. 57
Figure 5-65 Chad Niger 50 class 47 .............................................................................................. 58
Figure 5-66 Niger sample locations ranging from 60 to 250 miles
SE and east of Niamey, Niger ....................................................................................................... 59
Figure 5-67 Chad sample locations ranging from 250 to 500 miles NE
of N’Djamena, Chad ...................................................................................................................... 59
x
List of Tables
Table 3-1 Samples and sample locations .......................................................................... 7
Table 4-1 Linear Classification System and Parameters ................................................. 11
Table 5-1 Relevant Classes to the Chad Niger Region.................................................... 15
1
Chapter 1
Introduction
It is known that trade winds are a major influence upon the deposition of dusts and
other fine sediments. Aeolian transport processes, such as the Trans-Atlantic trade winds,
have deposited fine surface sediments from Africa across the Atlantic Ocean to the Americas.
However, the specific amount or percentage of African surface sediment which has been
transported remains unknown. Furthermore, chemical and physical alterations may have
occurred at some point within the transportation process. Alteration may be affected by the
duration which the sediment spends in the atmosphere and possessed the potential to absorb
pollutants which may include chlorine, sulphates, and organics (Sullivan et al., 2007; Falkovich
et al., 2004; Mamane et al., 1980). Upon deposition, the sediment or dust could initiate allergy
issues for both children and susceptible adults. (Goudie and Midddleton, 2001; Prospero,
1999; Prospero et al., 1981; Mahowald et al., 2005; Mather et al., 2008). To date, it is
uncertain the exact number of asthma hospitalizations which have been the result reactions
with African sediment or dust.
Secondly, atmospheric dusts are believed to contribute nutrients for Central and
South American forests, though the exact amount contributed is unknown at this time
(Bartholet, 2012). Soil within the Amazon basin is constantly bombarded with heavy rainfall
which has depleted soil of nutrients, and thus African dusts are likely a source of
replenishment of lost nutrients. Surface sediments of South America have been considered to
exhibit a relatively high iron content, crucial for vegetation within the region, but the high iron
content may damage to ocean ecosystems due to the addition of anthropogenic pollutants
(Bartholet, 2012). One such study on the effect of iron and anthropogenic pollutants showed
that iron transported in the atmosphere may have the potential to bond with ambient acids in
the atmosphere, and caused iron particles to be more soluble and therefore increased the
amount of available iron in the ocean (Bartholet, 2012).
2
A tertiary effect of African dust would be the impact upon climate as a result of
balance change between solar and thermal radiation (IPCC, 2007). The complete extent of
the effect of aerosolized dust upon chemical reactions in the atmosphere remains (Formenti,
et al., 2011). Due to the effect of atmospheric dusts as a potential hazard, nutrient
replenishment, and effect upon global climate, an accurate characterization and identification
of surface sediment provenance is crucial in understanding the process or sediment creations
as well as the chemical and physical changes which may occur during transportation. The
aforementioned is the cause to develop an initial elemental and chemical analysis.
3
Chapter 2
Previous Research
Previous research indicated that North and Central African surface sediments have
been transported and deposited to the Iberian Peninsula and predominately consist of
calcite-dolomite, silica, but do contain minor amounts of micas, feldspars, gypsum and other
trace minerals (Avila et al., 1997; Coz et al., 2009). Scanning Electron Microscope coupled
with Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (SEM/EDS) has been used to characterize 18
basic elements as well as the mineral content of dust derivation via elemental analysis.
Different elements were then clustered in order to generate sample classes which would
segregate elements. Results have shown that samples from Madrid after transport
generally consisted of between 65-85% silica. North African surface sediments
hypothetically cause the relative high abundance of silicates in dust samples collected from
the Iberian Peninsula.
Aspect Ratios (AR) were used, in addition to chemical analysis, to compare particle
morphology to characterize the potential for particle transportation in the atmosphere and to
try to determine the provenance of the dust itself. The determination was reached that
particle deposition occurred as a result of three mechanisms, impaction, sedimentation and
Brownian diffusion (Morman and Plumlee, 2013). For particles with a diameter larger than
0.5 µm, gravitational sedimentation is of significant importance, as the distance of particle
transportation is limited. For particles with a diameter less than 0.5 µm, a particle could be
governed by diffusional transport where minor displacements are the result of the collision
between gas molecules and particles (Shultz et al, 2000). Surface sediments from the Sahel
region were also comprised of an enhancement of secondary ferromagnetic minerals which
led to the conclusion that the concentration of fine-grained clay fraction (<2 µm) had a
4
tenfold difference between the arid north and the humid south of Niger. In addition, there
was also a less significant statistical correlation for hematite concentrations and rainfall
across the transect (Lyons et al, 2010). In some surface sediments from the Benin and
southern Togo region exhibited magnetic properties consistent with the parent rock. The
conclusion drawn by researchers was that climate variations did in fact play an important
role in source locations of African dust. Additional sample collection and characterization,
particle separation, and chemical analysis will be required if a better understanding of how
climate variations effect the distribution of African dusts (Lyons et al, 2010).
Dr. Joseph Prospero began preliminary research at the University of Miami with
samples of dusts collected from the Florida Keys, Bahamas, and the Amazon. It was
determined that any given year the Earth emitted approximately 2 billion metric tons of dust
and more than half of that originated from Africa. Another source stated that approximately
40 million metric tons of the aforementioned dusts consisted of iron and phosphates which
may travel up to 6400 km across the Atlantic Ocean to the Americas, and half of the dusts
were originated from the Bodele depression in Africa (Bartholet, 2012). In order for African
dusts across the Atlantic, a wind speed of approximately 4-12 meters per second was
required. The global transportation of dusts mainly affect the Earth’s climate in two ways.
The Albedo effect is known play a significant role in climate variations. In darker regions,
such as rainforests, higher amounts of thermal energy is absorbed and increases global
temperatures, whereas in highly reflective regions such as the polar ice caps higher
amounts of thermal energy is reflected back. Dusts being transported in the air may also
increase the albedo of the region due to their reflective nature. The second effect of dust
upon climate variation is the role of dust in cloud formation. The formation of clouds require
5
that water droplets form around a condensation nucleus, such as dust, which in turn may
either increase or decrease the climate and amount of rainfall (Bartholet, 2012).
Recent studies on Aeolian transportation and deposition has shown that there is a
link between inorganic mineral dusts and the overall health of the population (Morman and
Plumlee, 2013). There has been limited research on source characterizations and
traditionally caused difficulties in quantifying the health effects of long range transportation
of dust (Morman and Plumlee, 2013). An estimated 1.3 million deaths are the result of
outdoor air pollution (WHO, 2012a). Coarse particles, as defined by the USEPA (2012a),
are those between 2.5-10 µm in diameter with the toxicological effects of dust particles with
less than 5 µm being determined by the chemical stability of the particles. To date, there are
few studies which show a link between inorganic mineral dust and health effects (Morman and
Plumlee, 2013). One of the primary factors which must be determined is whether inorganic
mineral dust does have an effect in the population as well as the physical and chemical
characteristics of the dust (Plumlee et al, 2006). A growing concern of African dusts is high
silica content which may result in pneumoconiosis, also known as Desert Lung.
Pneumoconiosis is a concern for both livestock and humans in arid, dusty regions due to the
increase in desertification from climate change (Kuehn, 2006). Various studies have shown
that regional dust from sources, such as the Sahel/Saharan region of Africa, allude to an
overall increase in hospitalization and mortality in areas such as Europe (Morman and
Plumlee, 2013; Perez et al, 2007). However, contrary studies conducted by Kuehn (2006),
found no evidence which would suggest that increased mortality rates were the result of dusts
which had be deposited in Barbados and increased deposition of African dusts (Bennet et al,
2006; Pospero et al. 2008). Current estimates place approximately half of all African dusts had
a diameter of less than 2.5 µm (Morman and Plumlee, 2013), which would indicate that a
6
significant amount of African dust could be easily aerosolized and transported across the
Atlantic Ocean.
Despite numerous studies that have been conducted on the effects of both short
range and long range dust transportation, inconsistencies and a lack of data have led to a
conclusion that additional research remains needed on sample and source characterization,
model parameters, and susceptibility (Morman and Plumlee, 2013). Morman and Plumlee
(2013) s tated, “Much more information regarding source location, sample
characterization (biological, mineralogy, and chemistry), emission rates and models, and
particle size are needed to understand the implication of exposure and etiological agent(s)
responsible.”
7
Chapter 3
Objectives and Expected Outcomes
This study was conducted with the primary objective of characterizing North African
surface soils/dusts from the Chad-Niger region by their elemental compositions as revealed in
the Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). By determining a consistent chemical composition
in the soils/dusts at neighboring locations, it was hoped that future studies would be able to
determine the provenance of dust particles from trans-Atlantic winter storms if dust samples
were collected post trans-Atlantic transport. It is posited that the various soil samples from the
Chad-Niger region have unique chemical compositions that can be categorized in this study
and be used as an identifier of sediment provenance in future studies. These samples are
expected to primarily consist of silica, aluminum, iron, and potassium. Data was collected
from 11 samples that were collected between July and September 2007 (Lyons et al. 2011):
Table 3-1 Samples and sample locations
8
Chapter 4
Research Design and Procedures
The mineralogical composition of the 11 dust samples were characterized by
computer controlled SEM analysis (CCSEM). Dust samples were prepared for CCSEM analysis
in the following stages. (i) A subsample of material was placed in a 50 mL test tube containing
distilled water to which a small amount (< 1 ml) of surfactant will be added, and then the
suspension was ultrasonically agitated for 5 minutes. (ii) From a chimney reservoir, an aliquot of
the soil in water suspension was filtered onto a 25 mm diameter 0.4 µm pore size polycarbonate
membrane filter. To ensure an optimal sample preparation for CCSEM, several filters were
prepared. Samples with at least one particle diameter separation between particles were
preferred for analysis. (iii) Prior to analysis, each filter was attached to an SEM mount with
adhesive carbon paint.
(a) (b)
Figure 4-1 (a) Ultrasonic Cleaning System and (b) vacuum and filter system
CCSEM analysis was performed on an ASPEX/FEI personal scanning electron
microscope (PSEM). Specimen images were obtained from the backscatter electron (BE)
collection from an SEM operated in variable pressure mode. Composition of the sample particles
was determined by energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) using an ASPEX/FEI
OmegaMax™ silicon drift detector (SDD) with an ultra-thin window (permitting light element
(Carbon, and Oxygen) detection). Standard operating conditions for the SEM were: an
9
accelerating voltage of 25 keV, a beam current of approximately 1.0 nA, and a working distance
of approximately 16 mm.
The soil/dust individual particle data was collected in an automated mode with the
electron beam and SEM stage being moved under computer control. In order to operate in
automated image analysis mode, the SEM analysis for data collection purposes required specific
software set-up conditions. Firstly, the BE signal threshold was set to separate the soil particles
(generally referred to in the analysis as “features”) on the filter from the filter itself. This
investigation was concerned with the inorganic particles in the soil which have an average atomic
number greater than carbon (atomic number 7). Thus, a binary threshold was set in the software
where the BE signal strength for a feature that was greater than the carbon filter. The low atomic
number for carbon allowed the setting of a binary threshold for feature with relative ease. Having
a detection limit above this threshold allowed for automated analysis when the software was
operating in search and detect mode. This meant that in the automated feature analysis (AFA) all
inorganic particles deposited on the filter were subjected to detection and analysis, and inclusion
in the process was not restricted to features with a specific composition. Thus, for instance,
metal bearing particles in the sample were recorded as a subset of the analyzed particles and
could be subsequently isolated in the CCSEM data.
A minimum of 10 seconds per particle or the acquisition of 10,000 X-ray counts was the
minimum dwell time for the capture of x-ray data which was accomplished at the SEM electron
beam was rastered in chords over the sample feature. During this process, information on the
average composition of the whole particle was collected and then stored. The software vector
editor was used to identify the elements in the feature x-ray spectrum. This allowed for the semi-
quantitative analysis of the elements in the spectrum. Individual elements were determined from
a vector calculation (filter-fit) by the software. Standard spectra for all the elements are used with
these standards collected by the x-ray detector for the machine. This technique assumed that the
unknown spectra could be represented as a weighted sum of the reference spectra. The k-ratio
is constant in the weighted sum is closely related to the weight percentage. During the analysis,
10
samples were run and data stored with the goal of sampling of the order of 4,500 features.
Elements of interest were sodium (Na), magnesium (Mg), aluminum (Al), silica (Si),
phosphorus(P), sulfur (S), chlorine (Cl), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), titanium (Ti), chromium (Cr),
manganese (Mn), iron (Fe), nickel (Ni), copper (Cu), and zinc (Zn).
Figure 4-2 Computer Controlled Scanning Electron Microscope
Once the mineralogical constituents of a sample had been identified (in the CCSEM
data), they were compared to those of the other samples in the study by sorting the data through
the linear classification system. The class numbers and the class rule of the classification
scheme are set out in Table 4.1. This is the classification scheme through which all the data
were sifted.
11
Table 4-1 Linear Classification System and Parameters
Class Parameters 1 Si > 98% 2 Ca > 98% 3 Fe > 98% 4 Na > 98% 5 Al > 99% 6 Ti > 60% 7 Zn > 4% 8 SiAl > 98% and Si < 50% 9 SiAl > 98% and Si > 75%
10 AlSi > 98% 11 SCa > 98% 12 CaSi > 98% 13 FeS > 98% and S > 3% 14 Ca Mg > 98% and Ca > 3% and Mg > 3% 15 KCl > 98% and K > 3% and Cl > 3% 16 FeP > 98% and Fe > 60% 17 FeSi > 98% 18 MgSi > 98% and Mg > 3% 19 SiNa > 98% 20 NaCl > 98% and Cl > 3% 21 NaFe > 98% 22 FeCa > 98% 23 FePSi > 98% and Fe > 3% and P > 3% and Si > 3% 24 FeNaP > 98% 25 NaMgSi > 98% and Na > 3% and Mg > 3% and Si > 3% 26 NaAlFe > 98% and Na > 3% and Al > 3% and Fe > 3% 27 NaSiFe > 98% and Na > 3% and Si > 3% and Fe > 3% 28 NaSiCa > 98% and Na > 3% and Si > 3% and Ca > 3% 29 MgSiCa > 98% and Mg > 3% and Si > 3% and Ca > 3% 30 AlSiFe > 98% and Al > 3% and Si > 3% and Fe > 3% 31 AlSiK > 98% and Al > 3% and Si > 3% and K > 3% 32 AlSiCa > 98% and Al > 3% and Si > 3% and Ca > 3% 33 AlSiNa > 98% and Al > 3% and Si > 3% and Na > 3% 34 NaAlSiCa > 98% and Na > 3% and Al > 3% and Si > 3 % and Ca > 3% 35 NaAlSiFe > 98% and Na > 3% and Al > 3% and Si > 3 % and Fe > 3% 36 NaAlSiK > 98% and Na > 3% and Al > 3% and Si > 3 % and K > 3% 37 AlSiKFe > 98% 38 AlSiFeMg > 98% 39 AlSiFeP > 98% 40 AlSiFeCa > 98% and Al > 3% and Si > 3% and Fe > 3% and Ca > 3% 41 AlSiKCa > 98% and Al > 3% and Si > 3% and K > 3% and Ca > 3% 42 MgAlSiCa > 98% and Mg> 3% and Al > 3% and Si > 3% and Ca > 3% 43 MgCaSiFe > 98% and Mg> 3% and Ca > 3% and Si > 3% and Fe > 3% 44 Removed from analysis due to redundancy 45 AlSiKFeCa > 98% and Al > 3% and Si > 3% and K > 3% and Fe > 3% and Ca > 3% 46 NaMgAlSiFe > 98% and Na > 3% and Mg > 3% and Al > 3% and Si > 3% and Fe > 3% 47 MgAlSiKFe > 98% and Mg > 3% and Al > 3% and Si > 3% and K > 3% and Fe > 3% 48 MgAlSiCaFe > 98% and Mg > 3% and Al > 3% and Si > 3% and Ca > 3% and Fe > 3% 49 NaAlSiCaFe > 98% and Na > 3% and Al > 3% and Si > 3% and Ca > 3% and Fe > 3% 50 FePSiAlNa > 98% and Fe > 3% and P > 3% and Si > 3% and Al > 3% and Na > 3% 51 NaAlSiKFe > 98% and Na > 3% and Al > 3% and Si > 3% and K > 3% and Fe > 3% 52 MgAlSiKFeCa > 98% and Mg > 3% and Al > 3% and Si > 3% and K > 3% and Fe > 3% and Ca > 3%
12
Table 4-1- continued
53 MgAlSiKFeNa > 98% and Mg > 3% and Al > 3% and Si > 3% and K > 3% and Fe > 3% and Na > 3% 54 MgAlSiCaFeNa > 98% and Mg > 3% and Al > 3% and Si > 3% and Ca > 3% and Fe > 3% and Na > 3% 55 MgAlSiKFeCa > 98% and Mg > 3% and Al > 3% and Si > 3% and K > 3% and Fe > 3% and Ca > 3% 56 NaAlSiKFeCaMg > 98% and Na > 3% and Al > 3% and Si > 3% and K > 3% and Fe > 3% and Ca > 3% and Mg > 3% 57 Ti > 3% and < 60% 58 Mn > 4% 100 Unclassified
13
Chapter 5
Results
A total of 11 samples were analyzed (see Figures 5-1, 5-19, and 5-20). Upon completion
of the experiment, results were tabulated by how the particles were sorted using the linear
classification scheme in Table 4-1. There was an average of approximately 4,000 particles
analyzed per sample with a minimum of 2,455 particles analyzed in Chad Niger 9, and a
maximum of 6,187 particles analyzed in Chad Niger 4.
Several approaches to analyzing the data were undertaken. Firstly, an average
concentration for each class was calculated across the 11 samples analyzed to determine if there
was a trend that could be followed across the Chad Niger samples. Once an average
concentration had been determined for each class, a cut-off of 1% concentration was used
leaving 23 of the original 60 classes. From the classes that remained, a 5% cut-off was used to
determine major constituent classes to begin analyzing a trend amongst the 11 samples.
Of the 23 classes which comprised greater than one percent of the sample composition,
five of the classes were considered major classes with an average concentration above five
percent. The remaining 18 classes were considered minor classes. Table 5-1 summarizes the
classes for the Chad Niger samples with the five major classes being highlighted with bold type,
and the summary of the results for the 23 classes can be found in a table located in Appendix A.
14
Figure 5-1 Chad Niger sample locations
15
Table 5-1 Relevant Classes to the Chad Niger Region
Class Parameters
1 Si > 98%
2 Ca > 98%
3 Fe > 98%
6 Ti > 60%
7 Zn > 4%
8 SiAl > 98% and Si < 50%
9 SiAl > 98% and Si > 75%
30 AlSiFe > 98% and Al > 3% and Si > 3% and Fe > 3%
31 AlSiK > 98% and Al > 3% and Si > 3% and K > 3%
33 AlSiNa > 98% and Al > 3% and Si > 3% and Na > 3%
35 NaAlSiFe > 98% and Na > 3% and Al > 3% and Si > 3 % and Fe > 3%
36 NaAlSiK > 98% and Na > 3% and Al > 3% and Si > 3 % and K > 3%
37 AlSiKFe > 98%
38 AlSiFeMg > 98%
40 AlSiFeCa > 98% and Al > 3% and Si > 3% and Fe > 3% and Ca > 3%
46 NaMgAlSiFe > 98% and Na > 3% and Mg > 3% and Al > 3% and Si > 3% and Fe > 3%
47 MgAlSiKFe > 98% and Mg > 3% and Al > 3% and Si > 3% and K > 3% and Fe > 3%
49 NaAlSiCaFe > 98% and Na > 3% and Al > 3% and Si > 3% and Ca > 3% and Fe > 3%
51 NaAlSiKFe > 98% and Na > 3% and Al > 3% and Si > 3% and K > 3% and Fe > 3%
53 MgAlSiKFeNa > 98% and Mg > 3% and Al > 3% and Si > 3% and K > 3% and Fe > 3% and Na > 3%
54 MgAlSiCaFeNa > 98% and Mg > 3% and Al > 3% and Si > 3% and Ca > 3% and Fe > 3% and Na > 3%
55 MgAlSiKFeCa > 98% and Mg > 3% and Al > 3% and Si > 3% and K > 3% and Fe > 3% and Ca > 3%
56 NaAlSiKFeCaMg > 98% and Na > 3% and Al > 3% and Si > 3% and K > 3% and Fe > 3% and Ca > 3% and Mg > 3%
57 Ti > 3% and < 60%
58 Mn > 4%
59 Si > 40%
100 Unclassified
Classes 1, 9, 30, 35, and 37 were considered major classes with average concentrations
greater than five percent
16
Trends in the data set indicate that the primary elements that comprised the Chad Niger
samples were Al, Si, and Fe from the major classes: 1, 9, 30, 35, and 37. Class 35 also included
greater than three percent Na, and class 37 included traces of K with the primary three elements.
These five major classes accounted for 50.1% of the total particles analyzed in this study.
Notable minor classes with concentrations above three percent included classes 31, 46,
47, 53, 57, and 100. Al-Si appear in classes 31, 46, 47 and 53 with Fe, Na, and K in varying
concentrations, but classes 46, 47, and 53 add concentrations of Mg that are greater than three
percent. Classes 57 and 100 are the outliers with class 57 having concentrations of Ti between
three and 60 percent, and class 100 for particles that do not adhere to the criteria of the
established linear classification scheme. The six notable minor classes comprised 22.7% of the
total particles analyzed. The remaining 12 minor classes accounted for 21.0% of the analyzed
particles. The remaining 37 classes in the linear classification scheme comprised of the
remaining 6.2% of the particles are were not considered substantial constituents for this study.
Once the data was tabulated, an average for each class was calculated, and the results
of the individual samples were compared to the regional average for each class. A summary of
this comparison for each sample has been compiled along with a graph that can visually show
individual sample trends against the regional class averages that resulted from this experiment.
Deviations from these averages could potentially help identify any potential unique elemental
markers for each sample.
17
Chad Niger 2
Chad Niger 2 peaked in class 30. Chad Niger 2 had greater than five percent
concentrations of three major and three minor classes. The data tends to follow the overall data
trends of the average of the 23 classes across the 11 samples, but has two notable departures
from the trend at classes 57 and 100. Compared to the sample set average, Chad Niger 2 had
much higher concentrations in classes 57 and 100. This indicated a higher than average of
particles present with higher than average presence Ti. Figure 5-2 demonstrates how
concentrations from Chad Niger 2 compare to the average concentrations from all of the Chad
Niger samples.
Figure 5-2 Chad Niger 2 compared to the overall class averages
18
Chad Niger 3
Chad Niger 3 in general was an outlier to this data set. There was no consistency
between the profile of Chad Niger 3 and the regional averages. Chad Niger 3 peaked in class 37
which was different than most other samples that primarily had a max concentration in class 30.
Chad Niger 3 also had a much higher class 37 concentration when compared to other samples in
the set. The increase in class 30 indicates more K than typically found in Chad Niger samples
while class 37 indicates a Ca concentration not typically seen in other samples. Class 35 is also
much lower than average for this sample set indicating Na is not as prevalent for this sample as
observed in other Chad Niger samples. Overall, Chad Niger 3 appeared to be the biggest outlier
in this batch of samples as it did not fit the averages of the data set with any consistency. Figure
5-3 demonstrates how concentrations from Chad Niger 3 compare to the average concentrations
from all of the Chad Niger samples.
Figure 5-3 Chad Niger 3 compared to the overall class averages
19
Chad Niger 4
Similar to the data set averages, Chad Niger 4 peaked in class 30, but did have a
noticeably higher concentration of classes 6 and 57 indicating there was more Ti in this sample
than the rest of the study. Other classes within Chad Niger 4 generally followed the trend of the
overall data set averages, albeit at generally lower concentrations. However, class 35 was
observed to be much lower than average indication a lower Na concentration than generally
encountered. Figure 5-4 demonstrates how concentrations from Chad Niger 4 compare to the
average concentrations from all of the Chad Niger samples.
Figure 5-4 Chad Niger 4 compared to overall class averages
Chad Niger 2 and 4 Operator assisted scanning electron microscopy analysis
Samples 2 and 4 are from a group of samples collected in the far west of the sampling
area. Both have important particle assignments in class 30. However sample 2 had a significant
percentage of particles that were collected in the unclassified class. This indicates that sample 2
had a significant number of particles with complex compositions that could not be classified by all
the defined classes in the scheme.
20
Part of this study is trying to assess whether there are substantive difference between the
western most samples (samples 2 and 4) and the east most samples (samples 48 and 50). We
are positing that samples from spatially separated areas may be different enough at the individual
particle level to make it possible to distinguish the material from each area in a mixed aerosol
sample. The goal is to determine whether we can attribute particles from a specific source in a
windblown dust distal from the source area(s)
A comparison of samples 2 and 4 vs. samples 48 and 50 will be made later; here we are
simply evaluating particles in samples 2 and 4 by operator evaluation in the SEM. Two SEM fields
of view (FOV), containing several particles, were examined and most of the particles were
examined at high magnification and the X-ray spectrum of each was collected. Some particles
could be clearly attributed to one class in the scheme. For example two Si-only particles (quartz)
were recorded (Figure 5-12 and 5-21). To the common class 37 we assigned particles from
samples 2 and 4 (Figure 5-5, Figure 5-15, Figure 5-17, Figure 5-18, and Figure 5-20), however
they were notably more common in sample 4 (Figure 5-17, Figure 5-18, and Figure 5-19). Clearly
in this limited sampling the particles in this area are defined by class 37 particles. The CCSEM
Class 30 was abundantly populated by particles from samples 2 and 4, however only two
particles attributable Class 30 were observed in the manual analysis (Figure 5-20). Class 51
particles were present in sample 2 (Figure 5-14 and Figure 5-16), but the outstanding feature of
sample 2 was the large number of particles assigned to the unclassified class in the CCSEM.
Assignment to the unclassified class means that the information provided by an individual particle
used to classify it (primarily element concentration data) did not correspond to any the rules
requirements in 58 class scheme. In the linear sort the feature dropped through the scheme not
being assigned to any class. Correspondingly in the operator examination Sample 2 was
characterized by particles with complex compositions (Figure 5-6, Figure 5-9, Figure 5-10, and
Figure 5-13). These particles typically had 8-11 elements in the X-ray spectra, and as yet
unaccountable Zn was found in a couple of these samples.
21
Figure 5-5 Chad Niger 2 class 37 particle
Figure 5-6 Chad Niger 2 complex composition unclassified particle
22
Figure 5-7 Chad Niger 2 class 40 particle
Figure 5-8 Chad Niger 2 class 8 particle
23
Figure 5-9 Chad Niger 2 complex composition unclassified particle
Figure 5-10 Chad Niger 2 complex composition unclassified particle
24
Figure 5-11 Chad Niger 2 class 47
Figure 5-12 Chad Niger 2 class 1
25
Figure 5-13 Chad Niger 2 complex composition unclassified particle
Figure 5-14 Chad Niger 2 class 51
26
Figure 5-15 Chad Niger 2 class 37
Figure 5-16 Chad Niger 2 class 51
27
Figure 5-17 Chad Niger 4 class 37
Figure 5-18 Chad Niger 4 class 37
28
Figure 5-19 Chad Niger 4 class 37
Figure 5-20 Chad Niger 4 class 30
29
Figure 5-21 Chad Niger 4 class 1
Plate 5-22 Chad Niger 4 class 36
30
Chad Niger 9
Chad Niger 9 peaks in class 30 with noticeable concentrations of class 1 and class 37.
This shows as with other Chad Niger samples, that there is a high amount of Si that is a main
component for soil samples from this region. As with other samples, class 37 indicates a K and
Fe concentration above regional averages. Class 35 being lower than average for the region
indicates a small amount of Na being present, but not in the quantities found in the other samples
for this experiment. Classes 46 and 53 also were below expected concentrations indicating Mg
and K are not as abundant in this sample as compared to the rest of the region. Figure 5-23
demonstrates how concentrations from Chad Niger 9 compare to the average concentrations
from all of the Chad Niger samples.
Figure 5-23 Chad Niger 9 compared to overall class averages
31
Chad Niger 40
Chad Niger 40 is another sample that did not correspond to class averages across the
data set. Classes 1 and 9 were the primary constituents which indicates the primarily Si and Al
make up with Fe still present, but in slightly lower concentrations than the rest of the samples in
the region. A higher concentration of class 35 shows Na and Fe are present in Chad Niger 40
which can account for some deviation from the data set class averages. Zn was also present in
class 7 at slightly above average concentrations. Figure 5-24 demonstrates how concentrations
from Chad Niger 40 compare to the average concentrations from all of the Chad Niger samples.
Figure 5-24 Chad Niger 40 compared to overall class averages
32
Chad Niger 42
Chad Niger 42 had a high concentration of Si similar to the other samples, but the low
percentage of class 1 indicated a lower pure Si make up than that of the average Chad Niger
sample. Chad Niger 42 peaked with class 30, similar to other samples, but also saw a high
concentration of class 35 indicating more Na and Fe than normally found in the Chad Niger
region. Chad Niger 42 demonstrated a lower than expected K concentration with a lower than
average class 37 result. Figure 5-25 demonstrates how concentrations from Chad Niger 42
compare to the average concentrations from all of the Chad Niger samples.
Figure 5-25 Chad Niger 42 compared to overall class averages
33
Chad Niger 44
Chad Niger 44 fit the overall class average profile very well. Class 30 was the primary
component with the normal elements Si, Al, and Fe being a bulk of this sample. Chad Niger 44
did have slightly lower concentrations of Na and K with classes 51 and 53 being lower than the
data set trend. Ti also appeared to be less prevalent in this sample as classes 6 and 57 were
lower than the averages for the Chad Niger region. Figure 5-26 demonstrates how
concentrations from Chad Niger 44 compare to the average concentrations from all of the Chad
Niger samples.
Figure 5-26 Chad Niger 44 compared to the overall class averages
34
Chad Niger 45
Chad Niger 45 continued the trend of having class 30 as the primary component which
agreed with the Al, Si, and Fe elements being large constituents of the sediment from this region.
With higher than average concentrations of classes 38 and 47, Mg and K are shown to be
significant components of this sample. Other samples in the Chad Niger region have smaller
quantities of Mg and K, and overall they are not as prevalent in majority of the other samples.
Figure 5-27 demonstrates how concentrations from Chad Niger 45 compare to the average
concentrations from all of the Chad Niger samples.
Figure 5-27 Chad Niger 45 compared to the overall class averages
35
Chad Niger 47
Chad Niger 47, as with the previous samples had high Si content, and was primarily Si,
Al, and Fe as class 30 was the major constituent. Chad Niger 47 like Chad Niger 45 had higher
Mg and K concentrations from classes 46 and 47, and like Chad Niger 40, an above average
class 7 denoted a presence of Zn above average concentrations. A high response in class 53
showed that in addition to Mg, K, and Zn, Chad Niger 47 also had Na in higher concentrations
than the data set normal. Chad Niger 47 appeared to have one of the more diverse make ups of
this sample data set, but managed to follow the average trend with classes 46 and 53 being slight
outliers and showing higher than average Na, Mg, and K. Figure 5-28 demonstrates how
concentrations from Chad Niger 47 compare to the average concentrations from all of the Chad
Niger samples.
Figure 5-28 Chad Niger 47 compared to the overall class averages
36
Chad Niger 48
Chad Niger 48 peaks in class 30 and stays consistent to the Chad Niger region primarily
being Si, Al, and Fe. Chad Niger 48 only deviated from the averages in classes 35, 38, and 46,
and it can be shown that it is Mg and Na being present in above average concentrations for this
region. With a slightly higher value for class 53 which includes Mg, Al Si, K, Fe, and Na, it is the
presence of K that is slightly above average for this region as opposed the expected observed Si,
Al, and Fe values, and a slightly less than average concentration of Mg and Na. Figure 5-29
demonstrates how concentrations from Chad Niger 48 compare to the average concentrations
from all of the Chad Niger samples.
Figure 5-29 Chad Niger 48 compared to the overall class averages
37
Chad Niger 50
Chad Niger 50 had class 30 as the prime constituent. Si, Al, and Fe were the main
elements found in this sample. There were above average readings for classes 46 and 53 and
below average results for class 37 when compared to samples in the Chad Niger region. Classes
46 and 53 indicated that concentrations of Na and Mg were above regional averages, but while K
is present in class 53, the lower concentrations of class 35 should indicate K is not as prevalent in
Chad Niger 50. Figure 5-30 demonstrates how concentrations from Chad Niger 50 compare to
the average concentrations from all of the Chad Niger samples.
Figure 5-30 Chad Niger 50 compared to the overall class averages
38
As expected, the primary elements that comprised the Chad Niger samples were Al, Si,
and Fe. The consistent result of class 30 having the highest concentration in nine of 11 samples
confirms this expectation for the Chad Niger region. To better see any correlation between
samples and class concentrations a five percent cut-off was used to determine major classes.
With the most common class observed being class 30, it can be noted that the Chad
Niger region is primarily composed of alumnosilicate minerals with traces of Fe greater than 3%.
The results from classes 35 and 37 indicated Na and K are also regularly present in this region
with Na greater than three percent in 8.1% of the samples and traces of K found with the three
primary elements, Al, Si, and Fe, 6.4% of the time. Figure 5-31 shows all 11 samples overlaid on
a chart that shows visually the trends with the data, as well as demonstrates that some of the
samples have noticeable deviations from those trends as in the case of Chad Niger 3 and Chad
Niger 45.
Figure 5-13 Cumulative Results for 31 Chad Niger Samples across 60 classes
Once the 5% cut-off is applied in Figure 5-32, clearer trends emerged, and better
conclusions could be drawn. The five major classes stood out with most of the samples being
39
observed in classes 1, 9, 30, 35, and 37, but outliers also became more visible. Chad Niger 3
and Chad Niger 45 had properties that noticeably deviated from the other eight samples.
Figure 5-32 Results of the samples once a five percent cut-off was in place
Most of these samples can be clustered into groups of samples that have similar
concentrations of classes. In Figure 5-33, Chad Niger samples 9, 40, 42, 44, 45, 47, 48, and 50
are clustered. Chad Niger 42, 44, 45, 47, 48, and 50 show peaks in classes 9, 30, and 35
primarily. Chad Niger 9 has a peak in class 37 which indicates a higher presence of K than the
other samples who have Na from class 35. Chad Niger 45 does have an unusual peak in class
47 indicating a higher Mg and K presence, but otherwise fits the cluster well. Chad Niger 40 has
results that can to fit this cluster as a lower class 30 value could be explained by the high class 1
and 9 values indicating a much higher presence of Si and Al relative to other elements, but still
fitting the primarily Si, Al, Fe make-up of the cluster. Chad Niger 40 also having a higher class 31
value helps fit the cluster with class 31 indicating a presence of K which appear in the other
samples in classes 37 and 53.
40
Figure 5-33 Chad Niger 9, 40, 42, 44, 45, 47, 48, and 50 cluster
A second grouping can be made from Chad Niger 2 and Chad Niger 4 are also very
similar to the other cluster, but have a higher presence of Ti than that found in the first cluster of
eight samples. The peaks in classes 6 and 57 show a Ti concentration not typically seen in this
data set of 11 samples. Chad Niger 2 does have a higher percentage of particles that did not fit
the linear classification scheme than all the other 10 samples, and this could account for why its
class 30 result was lower than average as 14.5% of this sample failed to meet the analysis
criteria. Figure 15-34 will show Chad Niger 2 and Chad Niger 4 compared to each other with data
peaks in classes 30 and 57.
41
Figure 5-34 Chad Niger 2 and Chad Niger 4 results with a five percent cut-off
The outlier in this data set was Chad Niger 3. While five of the analyzed classes exceed
the five percent cut-off, only two were found to be major classes for this region. Of the two major
classes that had results over five percent, both had values far different than that of the overall
class averages. Class 30 comprised just 7.2% of Chad Niger 3 while the regional average was
21.2%. Class 37 made up 14.5% of Chad Niger 3 while the regional average was 6.4%.
However, the results from Chad Niger 3 do still agree that Si, Al, and Fe are the prime
components of the sample. Using a three percent cut-off, Figure 15-35 shows the diverse make-
up of Chad Niger 3. Minor classes 32, 40, 45, 47, 57, 59, and 100 all were greater than three
percent of Chad Niger 3. Based on these results it is noted that in addition to the three primary
elements, there is recordable amounts of Ca, K, Mg, and Ti found in Chad Niger 3. Chad Niger 3
also had a higher than average class 100 concentrations where 6.9% of analyzed particles failed
to meet the linear classification parameters. This was over 50% higher than the usual 4.2%
average for class 100 in this data set. Along with Chad Niger 2, there could be possible edge
effects of these samples locations relative to the other samples that could influence the source of
42
the sediment, thus influence the mineralogical constituents of this sample. However, more
samples from this region and adjacent regions would need to be assessed to confirm the
potential influence of distal sediments and source rocks.
Figure 5-35 Results for Chad Niger 3 using a three percent cut-off
Chad Niger 48 and 50 Operator assisted scanning electron microscopy analysis
Samples 48 and 50 are from a group of samples collected in the far east of the sampling
area. One has important particle assignments in class 30 (sample 48). The other sample (sample
50) has important had significant percentages of particles in classes 47, 55, and small
contribution to classes 38 and 31 and others. This indicates that sample 48 was very much
different to 50, and both were different from the far west samples 4 and 2.
For samples 48 and 50, two SEM fields of view (FOV), containing several particles, were
examined and most of the particles were examined at high magnification and the X-ray spectrum
of each was collected. Most particles particles could be clearly attributed to a class in the
scheme. So starting with sample 48 Si-only particles (quartz) were recorded (Figure 5-37, Figure
5-38, and Figure 5-40). But the dominant particle class was 30 (Figure 5-44 and Figure 5-46) this
43
AlSiFe class also dominated in the CCSEM of sample 48. In the case of sample 50 two very
similar particle types recorded similar percentages. Class 47 classified particles with and
MgAlSiKFe composition Class 50 classified particles with MgAlSiKFeCa composition. Clearly the
only difference is the presence of Ca. In the particle assignment to these classes by the operator
the amounts of K and Ca were often low and as the Potassium Kβline sits on top of the Calcium
Kα X-ray line it is sometimes hard to determine if Calcium is present in small amounts if
Potassium is present. As a point of interpretation Class 47 particles shown here sometimes
contain low quantities of Ti. This can be clearly seen in the four morphologically similar particles
termed elongated two of which have Ti two of which do not. It is clear that of the important
classifying elements Ti is of variable importance. In the CCSEM analysis it might be the case that
the Ti content of these particles is high enough to push them out of inclusion in class 47 and force
them to be included in class 57 (Ti-bearing). The decision was taken here that the homogenous
nature of the particles assigned to class 47 was not determined by the Ti content and so Ti was
ignored in the class attribution of the non-CCSEM analyzed particles.
Figure 5-36 Chad Niger 48 and Chad Niger 50 with five percent cut-off
44
Figure 5-37 Chad Niger 48 class 1
Figure 5-38 Chad Niger 48 class 1
45
Figure 5-39 Chad Niger 44 class 1
Figure 5-40 Chad Niger 48 class 1
46
Figure 5-41 Chad Niger 44 class 30
Figure 5-42 Chad Niger 48 class 39
47
Figure 5-43 Chad Niger 44 class 30
Figure 5-44 Chad Niger 48 class 30
48
Figure 5-45 Chad Niger 44 class 30
Figure 5-46 Chad Niger 48 class 30
49
Figure 5-47 Chad Niger 44 class 30
Figure 5-48 Chad Niger 50 class 55
50
Figure 5-49 Chad Niger 50 class 55
Figure 5-50 Chad Niger 50 class 55
51
Figure 5-51 Chad Niger 50 class 55
Figure 5-52 Chad Niger 50 class 55
52
Figure 5-53 Chad Niger 50 class 55
Figure 5-54 Chad Niger 50 class 55
53
Figure 5-55 Chad Niger 50 class 47 elongated
Figure 5-56 Chad Niger 50 class 47 elongated
54
Figure 5-57 Chad Niger 50 class 47 elongated
Figure 5-58 Chad Niger 50 class 47 elongated
55
Figure 5-59 Chad Niger 50 class 47
Figure 5-60 Chad Niger 50 class 47
56
4
Figure 5-61 Chad Niger 50 class 47
Figure 5-62 Chad Niger 50 class 47
57
Figure 5-63 Chad Niger 50 class 47
Figure 5-64 Chad Niger 50 class 47
58
Figure 5-65 Chad Niger 50 class 47
After looking at the data and potential clusters, a geographic analysis was conducted.
While sample clusters could be tied together statistically, the main difference for the regional
samples from the Chad Niger region were that the samples from Niger, samples Chad Niger 2, 3,
4, and 9, contained on average more Ti than samples from Chad which were samples Chad
Niger 40, 42, 44, 45, 47, 48, and 50. Classes 6 and 57 were more prevalent in samples from
Niger than samples from Chad. Thus, Ti could be the key element that differentiates the samples
from the two countries.
59
Figure 5-66 Niger sample locations ranging from 60 to 250 miles SE and east of Niamey, Niger
Figure 5-67 Chad sample locations ranging from 250 to 500 miles NE of N’Djamena, Chad
60
Chapter 6
Conclusions
The results of this investigation demonstrated that there are correlations to be made
between constituent concentrations and samples in the Chad Niger region. The samples
gathered demonstrated that the primary constituents were Si, Al, and Fe. There is varying
amounts of contributing mineralogy including Mg, Ca, Na, K, and Ti. After tabulating the resulting
data, it is apparent that based on the proposed classification system that North African dusts from
the Chad Niger region have several class traits in common while also having potential unique
class identifiers.
Regional analysis of the westernmost samples, Chad Niger 2 and Chad Niger 4, and the
easternmost samples, Chad Niger 48 and Chad Niger 50, show sub-regional uniqueness. Chad
Niger 2 and Chad Niger 4 indicate similarities with Al, Si, and Fe, however can be differentiated
by two classes. Sample 2 has a high percentage of class 100 while Sample 4 had a significant
amount class 37. Chad Niger 48 was dominated by class 30 while Chad Niger 50 had two
classes differentiate it from the other eastern sample with high percentages of classes 47 and 55.
These class differences between the samples demonstrate that these Chad Niger samples are
different at the individual particle level despite some general elemental similarities. This leads to
the conclusions that it is possible to undertake source attribution based on CCSEM to separate
source areas for windblown dust.
To improve upon this data, and better refine both the linear classification system and
correlations for the Chad Niger samples more research is needed. Making multiple runs of each
sample to get an aggregate class average for each sample and compiling a regional class
average from multiple runs of each sample would refine the data and the numbers and would
most likely bring a lot of these individual sample class averages in line with the regional results.
Another recommendation would be to take multiple samples from each location to better
homogenize the samples for each sub-region so that researchers could refine the data as it would
reduce the chances of outliers by reducing the odds of randomly selecting local anomalies and
61
passing the defects through to the analysis. Having multiple samples from each sub-region
would also allow for identification of unique identifiers within the Chad Niger region as consistent
results would confirm or disprove the presence of initial data outliers which would help
researchers create a more accurate elemental/mineralogical “fingerprint” for each sub-region and
region.
62
Appendix A
Tabulated Results from CCSEM Analysis
63
64
References
Avila, A., Queralt-Mitjans, I., Alarcon, M. 1997. Mineralogical Composition of African Dust
Delivered by Red Rains Over the Northeastern Spain, J. Geophys. Res, 102, 21 977–21
996. Bartholet, J. 2012. Swept From Africa to the Amazon, Scientific American, 45-49. Bennet, C.M., McKendry, I.G., Kelly, S., Denike, K., Koch, T. 2006. Impact of the 1998
Gobi Dust Event on Hospital Admission in the Lower Fraser Valley, British Columbia,
Sci. Tot. Environ. 366, 918-925.
Blanco, A., De Tomasi, F., Fillippo, E., Manno, D., Perrone, M.R., Serra, A., Tafuro,
A.M., Tepore, A. 2003. Characterization of African Dust Over Southern Italy, Atmos.
Chem. Phys. Discuss, 3, pp. 1-38.
Coz, A., Andrés, A., Soriano, S., Viguri, J. R., Ruiz, M. C., Irabien, J. A. 2009.
Influence of Commercial and Residual Sorbents and Silicates as Additives on the
Stabilisation/Solidification of Organic and Inorganic Industrial Waste, Journal of
Hazardous Materials, 164, 755–761.
Cos, E., Moreno, T., Artinano, B. 2011. Variations on the Mineralogical Particle
Properties of Atmospheric Saharan Dust from Different Source Regions. Revista de
la Sociedad Espanola de Mineralogia, Macla 15, pp. 69-70.
“Dust to Gust”. EurekAlert!. AAAS. 28 December 2006. Retrieved 17 August 2014.
65
Falkovich, A.H., Schkolnik, G., Ganor, E., Rudich, Y., 2004. Adsorption of Organic
Compounds Pertinent to Urban Environments onto Mineral Dust Particles.
J. Geophys. Res. 109, D02208. doi:10.1029/2003JD003919. Formenti, P., Shutz, Y., Desboeufs, K., Ebert, M., Kandler, K., Petzold, A., Scheuvens,
D., Weinbruch, S., Zhang, D. 2011. Recent Progress in Understanding Physical and
Chemical Properties of African and Asian Mineral Dust. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
8231-
8256, doi: 10.5194/acp-11-8231-2011.
Goudie, A.S., Middleton, N.J., 2001. Saharan Dust Storms: Nature and Consequences,
Earth-Sci. Rev., 179-204. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. Available from:
<http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr.pdf>.
Krech, S., McNeill, J.R., Merchant, C., Jump Up. Encyclopedia of World Environmental
History. Routledgw. Pp. 748-749. ISBN 0-415-93734-5 Lyons, R., Oldfield, F., Williams, E. 2010. Mineral Magnetic Properties of Surface
Soils/Sands Across Four North African Transects and Links to Climatic Gradients,
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, vol 11, issue 8, doi:
10.1029/2010GC003183.
66
Lyons, R., Oldfield, F., Williams, E. 2011. The Possible Role of Magnetic Measurements
in the Discrimination of Sahara/Sahel Dust Sources, Earth Surface Processes and
Landforms, vol 37, doi: 10.1002/esp.2268.
Mahowald, N.M., Baker, A.R., Bergametti, G., Brooks, N., Duce, R.A., Jickells, T.D.,
Kubilay, N., Prospero, J.M., Tegen, I. 2005. Atmospheric Global Dust Cycle and Iron
Inputs to the Ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 19, GB4025, doi:
10.1029/2004GB002402.
Mamane, Y., Ganor, E., Donagi, A.E., 1980. Aerosol Composition of Urban and Desert
Origin in the Eastern Mediterranean I: Individual Particle Analysis. Water Air Soil Pollut.
14, 29–43. Mather, R.L., Reynolds, S.E., Wolff, G.A., Williams, R.G., Torre-Valdes, S., Woodward,
E.M.S., Landolfi, A., Pan, X., Sanders, R., Achterberg, E.P. 2008. Phosphorus Cycling
in the North and South Atlantic Ocean Subtropical Gyres, Nature Geoscience, 1, 439-
443.
Mormon, S., Plumlee, G. 2013. The Role of Airborne Mineral Dusts in Human Disease,
Aeolian Research 9, 203-212.
Plumlee, G.S., Morman, S.A., Ziegler, T.L. 2006. The Medical Geochemistry of Dusts,
Soils, and Other Earth Materials: Invited. In: Lollar, G.S. (Ed.), Treatise on
Geochemistry, vol. 9, Elsevier, pp. 1-61.
Prospero, J.M., Glaccum, R.A., Nees, R.T. 1981. Atmospheric Transport of Soil
Dust from Africa to South America, Nature, 289, 570-572.
67
Prospero, J.M., 1999. Long-Range Transport of Mineral Dust in the Global Atmosphere:
Impact of African Dust on the Environment of the Southeastern United States, Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 3396-3403.
Shultz, H., Brand, P., Heyder, J. 2000. Particle Deposition in the Respiratory tract. In:
Gehr, Peter, Heyder, Joachim (Eds.), Particle-Lung Interactions. Lung Biology in Health
and Disease, vol. 143. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, pp. 229-277.
Sullivan, R.C., Guazzotti, S.A., Sodeman, D.A., Tang, Y., Carmichael, G.R., Prather,
K.A., 2007. Mineral Dust is a Sink for Chlorine in the Marine Boundary Layer. Atmos.
Environ. 41, 7166–7179.
United States Enviromental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2012a. Particulate Matter.
Available from: http://www.epa.gove/airquality/particlepollution/
World Health Organization (WHO). 2012a. Available from:
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsseet/fs313/en/
68
Biographical Information
Zakariah Sabatka is currently a geologist with MD America Energy in Fort Worth, Texas.
He has a Master of Science degree in Earth and Environmental Sciences from the University of
Texas at Arlington as well as two Bachelor of Science degrees, one from Texas A&M University
in Renewable Natural Resources, and one from the University of Texas at Arlington in Geology.
Mr. Sabatka has worked professionally in multiple geoscience roles including time as an
environmental geoscientist working on site investigation and remediation projects in the United
States and Australia, and he has also worked as a petroleum geologist developing the Eaglebine
formation in East Texas. Mr. Sabatka also holds a Professional Geoscientist License in Geology
from the State of Texas Board of Professional Geoscientists. His future plans include continuing
to grow personally and professionally in a range of geoscience roles with the main goal of
increasing his technical abilities so that he may mentor younger professionals and students
interested in a wide variety of geological topics.