CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
Transcript of CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
1/36
Public Participation in CCS
Sallie E. Greenberg, Ph.D.Energy Research & Development
University of Illinois Illinois State Geological Survey
13 June 2016 !RECS !Birmingham, AL
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
2/36
" Focus on project developer to-date
" Shift to government and regulations
" Aspects more readily undertaken by government?
"
What is impact of regulation on engagement and outreach?
" Are CCS laws best tool to determine engagement processes?
" How do stakeholder perceptions of CCS impact framework?
Role of stakeholder engagement in CCS
IEA Carbon Capture and Storage Legal andRegulatory Review (3rdEdition)
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
3/36
CCS Engagement Foundations
International FinanceCorporation World
Bank Group
IAP2
World Resources
Institute Community
Engagement Guidelines
U.S. DOE Public
Outreach and Educationfor Carbon Storage
Projects
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
4/36
Stakeholder Engagement isshared responsibility
of three main groups
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
5/36
!"#$%&'()*
,(-&%
."-/*/(0
1&2")*
3)(4"-'
."5"%(6")*
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
6/36
!"#$%&'("# *+,(* ,+--."/'0 ,+"'$1'
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
7/36
21,3("4$ /"5+%-(6+" (7+.' '3$ 8%+9$,'
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
8/36
:#$"650 '3$ (88%+8%/('$ *$;$* +5 $"4(4$-$"'
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
9/36
'& +5 '3$ 8%+9$,'
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
10/36
?+"6".$ $"4(4$-$"' '3%+.43+.'
'3$ 8%+9$,'@& */5$ ,0,*$
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
11/36
Communities must perceive they havethe ability to influence decision-making
processes.
Project planning, management, and
engagement can inform project design
and operation resulting in mutually
beneficial outcomes.
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
12/36
Gaining the trust of the community
is the key to successful engagement
and, if that trust is broken, it can beimpossible to regain.
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
13/36
Public engagement will be affected
by the local political and social dynamics,but the structure and design of the
engagement process itself is important.
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
14/36
Engagement and outreach cannot be
added on to a project as an afterthought,
but must be integrated throughout the
process.
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
15/36
Successful outreach and engagement
around a project does not always translate
into successful deployment of CCS in thatcommunity.
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
16/36
" Began public engagement early" Made public engagement
a priority"
Created, evaluated, and refinedcommunications plan
" Integrated public engagement
into project management
" Made sufficient investment in
time and resources"
Understood and consulted
community" Maintained flexibility and
diligence
Creating a stakeholder engagement strategy thatresonates
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
17/36
Effective Stakeholder Engagement
17
" Fosters relationship between project developers,regulators, and communities
"
Establishes open lines of communication" Addresses questions and concerns
" Identifies and mitigates potential risk
" Provides no guarantee of public support
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
18/36
Engagement Objectives
18
" Provide factual information
" Cultivate knowledgeable stakeholders
"
Create trust between stakeholders andproject team
" Inform about potential project risks & benefits
" Address perceived risks
"
no less "real" for implementing outreach
" can rapidly expand transform into public opposition
if ignored.
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
19/36
!"#$%&'#()*++,(*+
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
20/36
CCSPortrayedasSymptomofProblem
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
21/36
Media Portrayal
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
22/36
CCS Portrayed as Solution or Bridge
CCS as part ofportfolio to reduceGHG
CCS based ongeologic knowledgeof subsurfacebehavior
CCS based on long-
standing industrialpractices
CCS bridge
technology
7($)-"8 :2A 2BCD EFGF
HI!2 J(8 K,$"(%/+
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
23/36
One cup of super critical CO2equals 277 cups ofCO2at the surface under atmospheric pressure
CO2is highly compressible
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
24/36
Helping People See through Simple and Powerful Analogy Use:Visualizing volume and pressure implications
One cup of CO2stored insubsurface
277 cups of CO2at the surface =
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
25/36
Flexibility !Awareness !Respect !Intuition !Adaptation !
Knowledge
Informal Engagement
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
26/36
Formal Engagement Processes
C.7*/, "+6,$ +5 8$%-/' (88*/,(6+"
C.7*/, ,+--$"' 8$%/+#
C.7*/, ,(" %$L.$&' 8.7*/, 3$(%/"4
C.7*/, 3$(%/"4 C.7*/, ,+--$"' 8$%/+#
M$&8+"&$ '+ ,+--$"'&
C.7*/, /&&.(",$ +5 #%(N 8$%-/'
C.7*/, ,+--$"' 8$%/+#
M$&8+"# '+ ,+--$"'&
C.7*/, (88$(* 8$%/+# 5+% >"(* 8$%-/'
Based on US regulatory procedures
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
27/36
Research Q&A for Science & Society
" How do you know the CO2is staying where you put it?"
What happens in the event of earthquakes?
" Induced seismicity
"
Fracture and catastrophic release of stored CO2"
Where does formation water go when CO2is injected?
" Increased pressure
"
Does CO2injection fracture rocks during injection?
" What are long-term implications of project?
"
Who is liable if something goes wrong with the project?"
How do you know it is safe?
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
28/36
Key Points Learned"
Public engagement is critical
"
Projects provide successfulexamples of engagement
" Do your homework
" Establish relationships
" Talk a lot
"
to as many different people
as possible
" as often as possible
" Know your audience
"
Know your topic" Be prepared
" Listen, respond, respect
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
29/36
" Proactively engage regulators
" Engage early and know the regulatory time clock
" Start early
"
Seek out examples (publicly available)" Provide balance of information detail important, but can distract
" Remain flexible
" Exceed requirements for public engagement and monitoring
"
Expect technical collaboration between USEPA and applicant
" USEPA focused on making technical, risk-based permitting decisions
" Modeling should be discussed in detail with USEPA prior to
development and verification
Projects provide precedent for regulatorystakeholders
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
30/36
Initial RiskAssessment
Research andOperational
Activities
Communication,Education, andEngagement
Interim RiskAssessment
RevisitCommunication
and CrisisManagement,
RiskCommunication
CompleteInjection &
Post-Injection
Monitoring
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Geologic UncertaintyOperational Uncertainty
Regulatory UncertaintySocial Uncertainty
Regulatory UncertaintySocial Uncertainty
Change in Scope
Long-term FundingChallenges in Knowledge Sharing
Complacency Potential
Institutional Memory Loss
Communication Plan & Implement Communication and Crisis Management
IBDP Risk Assessment and Stakeholder Engagement
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
31/36
Engagement Necessitates ExceedingPermit Requirements
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
32/36
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
33/36
" CCUS currently demonstrated in multiple projectsacross value chain
"
Integration leads toward commercialization" Important to see, touch, and understand connections
" Tolerance may vary across value chain
Demonstration of Entire CCUS Value Chain
sequestration.org/step
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
34/36
Engagement is an opportunity,NOT a barrier.
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
35/36
Pioneering Change. From the Ground Up.
Knowledge sharing and capacity building
continue to be key for
CCS technology deployment
andstakeholder engagement
www.sequestration.org/[email protected]
-
7/26/2019 CCUS and Public Engagement, Experiences and Best Practices
36/36
Pioneering Change. From the Ground Up.
STEP is a program of the Advanced Energy Technology Initiative, University of Illinois.
STEP is supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under
Award Number DE-FE0002462 and the Illinois Department ofCommerce and Economic Opportunity #09-484002.
The Midwest Geological Sequestration Consortium is funded by the U.S. Department of Energythrough the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) via the Regional Carbon
Sequestration Partnership Program (contract number DE-FC26-05NT42588) and by a costshare agreement with the Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity, Office
of Coal Development through the Illinois Clean Coal Institute.