Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

18
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Children with Vesicoureteral Reflux Members of the writing group (Alejandro Hoberman, M.D et al published on May 4, 2014, at NEJM.org.

description

antimicrobial prophylaxis

Transcript of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

Page 1: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

Antimicrobial Prophylaxisfor Children with Vesicoureteral Reflux

Members of the writing group (Alejandro

Hoberman, M.D et al

published on May 4, 2014,

at NEJM.org.

Page 2: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

Background

• Children with febrile urinary tract infection commonly have vesicoureteral reflux.

• Because trial results have been limited and inconsistent, the use of antimicrobial prophylaxis to prevent recurrences in children with reflux remains controversial.

Page 3: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

Objectives

• To determine whether long-term antimicrobial prophylaxis is • effective in preventing febrile or

symptomatic recurrences• Reducing the likelihood of renal

scarring• To determine the extent to which it

contributes to bacterial resistance

Page 4: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

Methods

• Study design: Randomized, placebo-controlled trial

• Duration: 2 years• Screened and enrolled children

between June 2007 and May 2011• Population: 607 children with

vesicoureteral reflux• Setting: 19 clinical sites across the United

States

Page 5: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

• Inclusion Criteria:• 2 to 71 months of age• Had Grade I to IV vesicoureteral reflux

• Exclusion Criteria:• Index infection occurred more than 112

days before randomiation• Children with coexisting urologic

anomalies• Contraindications for the use of TMP-

SMX

Page 6: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

• Urine specimen collection:• Catheterization or suprapubic aspiration

– not toilet trained children• Clean Voided specimens

• Extent of renal cortical defects• Assessed semiquantitatively by dividing

the cortex into 12 segments and determined severity on the basis of the number o segments affected

Page 7: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

• Baseline• Rectal swabs were tested for resistance

of E. coli isolates to TMP-SMX

Page 8: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis
Page 9: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis
Page 10: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis
Page 11: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis
Page 12: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

RESULTS

Page 13: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis
Page 14: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis
Page 15: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

• Recurrent urinary tract infection developed in 39 of 302 children who received prophylaxis as compared with 72 of 305 children who received placebo (relative risk, 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38 to 0.78).

• Prophylaxis reduced the risk of recurrences by 50% (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.74) and was particularly effective in children whose index infection was febrile (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.64) and in those with baseline bladder and bowel dysfunction (hazard ratio, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.58).

Page 16: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

• The occurrence of renal scarring did not differ

• Among 87 children with a first recurrence caused by Escherichia coli, the proportion of isolates that were resistant to trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole was• 63% in the prophylaxis group • 19% in the placebo group.

Page 17: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

Summary• What: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

for Children with Vesicoureteral Reflux• Where: 19 clinical sites across the United States• When: Screened and enrolled children between

June 2007 and May 2011• Why:

• To determine whether long-term antimicrobial prophylaxis • Effective in preventing febrile or symptomatic

recurrences• Reducing the likelihood of renal scarring

• To determine the extent to which it contributes to bacterial resistance

• How: Randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Page 18: Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

Take Home Message

Among children with vesicoureteral reflux after urinary

tract infection, antimicrobial prophylaxis was associated with

substantially reduced risk of recurrence but not of renal

scarring.