Analysing GT2-DRP1 Active Filter Sections
-
Upload
fabioariapro -
Category
Documents
-
view
41 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Analysing GT2-DRP1 Active Filter Sections
Analysing The GT2 & DRP-1 – active filter sections
1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................................2 2 Circuit analysis..................................................................................................................................3
2.1 GT-2 structure ............................................................................................................................3 2.2 DRP-1 structure..........................................................................................................................4 2.3 Comment....................................................................................................................................4
3 Simulations........................................................................................................................................5
Analysing The GT2 & DRP-1 – active filter sections
1 Introduction This document will present the results of a PSpice frequency analysis of the two filter sections used for reducing the harmonic content of the clipped signal in the Sans Amp GT2 manufactured by Tech 21 and the DRP-1 manufactured by Marshall. Both products are guitar amp simulators used for direct recording or live performances, and therefore both products simulate preamp, tonestack, poweramp and speakersection. Note that the GT2 also simulates various preamps and the change in frequency response when moving a mic from edge of speaker to cone. The simulations are based on the following schematics: Marshall DRP-1 found at www.GodiksenNet.com Sans Amp GT-2 found at www.TonePad.com
Analysing The GT2 & DRP-1 – active filter sections
2 Circuit analysis
2.1 GT-2 structure
Figur 1 GT2 structure The GT-2 can emulate various classic guitar amplifiers with different frequency response and gain structures. This is accomplished using the above structure, which again can be divided into the following sections: Pre filtering: this section consists of BP1 and Gain Stage 1. The main purpose of this section is to produce frequency responses related to the 3 amp type: California, British and Tweed. Please note that s3 is used to switch between the 3 amp types. Gain and clipping stage: The Drive control is included in this section, which controls the amplitude of the signal feeding BP 2. The main purpose of this section is to produce an output signal with a higher harmonic content; this is accomplished with BP 2 driving Gain Stage 2 into clipping. Please note that s2 is used to change gain mode and voicing from Clean, Hi-gain to Hot Wired. Filtering stage: LP 1 is low pass filter used to dampen unwanted higher order harmonics from the clipped signal from Gain Stage 2. This section is the target for this analysis. Mic placement simulator: This section is a passive filter emulating the frequency response of a microphone in 3 different positions in front of the speaker. Please note that s1 is used to change filter settings from Off axis, Center to Classic. Master tone control: This block is used to change the overall tone of the unit. The GT-2 is using the same gain and clipping stage, followed by a filtering stage emulating various guitar amplifiers. This approach, from my point of view, means that this unit primarily emulates the distortion produced in only one section of a guitar amplifier. Comparing with the DRP-1 which is emulating preamp and poweramp sections – se section 2.2 - reveals this fact. The main reason for the convincing sounds produced by this unit is a very well designed pre filtering section, which in combination with the gain stage and filtering stage produces a signal with the same harmonic content as a preamp, tonestack and poweramp of a classic amp. Having said this, the engineers who designed this unit, must have had the real classic amps analysed using spectrum analysers in order to get the needed information. The same goes for the design of the mic placement emulator.
Analysing The GT2 & DRP-1 – active filter sections
2.2 DRP-1 structure
Figur 2 DRP-1 structure The DRP-1 is – when compared to the GT-2 – a one trick pony, emulating a complete Marshall type of amp. This means that the DRP-1 emulates the gain structure and frequency response of preamp, poweramp and a cabinet with speaker. Preamp: Gain Stage 1, BP 1 and Gain Stage 2 in conjunction with LED Clip 1 emulates the performance of a tube preamp, including frequency response and harmonic content when overdriven. These sections are followed by a passive tone stack with a volume control completing the preamp section. The preamp section has a built in boost circuit, which increases gain in the section driving the tone stack. The boost function also inserts 2 LED’s used for clipping the signal right before the tone stack. Power amp: This section emulates the performance of a tube power amp, including frequency response and harmonic content when overdriven. The power amp section is made by using a single gain stage driving a clipping section made by 2 LED’s. The volume of the output signal is controlled by a volume control. The gain stage has a variable tone control, controlling the frequency response of the signal being clipped. Filtering stage: This section is a low pass filter used to dampen unwanted higher order harmonics from the clipped signal from the power amp. This means that the output signal should sound like a miked Marshall tube amp. This section is the target for this analysis. Note that the DRP-1 is having more than one clipping stage, meaning it will have an amp like performance; it is possible to use it with low preamp gain and instead have the feeling of an overdriven power amp. Of Course the opposite situation is an option too.
2.3 Comment Looking at the GT-2 described in section 2.1 figur 1, and removing the Mic emulator and the Tone Control, comparing with the DRP-1 described in section 2.2 it is obvious that the LP filter in both circuits fulfil the same demands – damping unwanted higher order harmonics from the clipped signal before delivering the signal. In the DRP-1 one could suspect that the purpose of the circuit to emulate the frequency response of a generic speaker, and in the GT-2 likewise. Having this in mind, I decided to examine these filters in both the DRP-1 and the GT-2. The result of my simulations is shown in section 3.
Analysing The GT2 & DRP-1 – active filter sections
3 Simulations
VEE0
15.00VC108
220n
-10.65uV
-21.63uV
VCC
U1A
TL072/301/TI
3
2
84
1+
-
V+
V-
OUT
DRP-1 The speaker emulator
-15.00V
R105
10k
0V
-674.3nV
0V
R106
10k-21.18uV
-15.00V
-11.65uV
R104
470k
R103
12k
C111
2.2n Rload_DRP1
100k
Vout_DRP1
15.00V
-11.20uV
VCC
0
U2A
TL072/301/TI
3
2
84
1+
-
V+
V-
OUT 0VV31Vac0Vdc
C_out_DRP1
10u
0
R107
12k
0
0V
C109
10n
C112
4.7n
0V
VEE
-21.18uV
0V0
C110
1n
Figur 3 DRP-1 Speaker emulator
0
-2.974uV
-15.00V
5.024uV
VEE
C12
1n
7.997uV
C8
560p
C_out_GT2
10u
0
U4A
TL072/301/TI
3
2
84
1+
-
V+
V-
OUT
R4
33k
V41Vac0Vdc
Cg
220n
-1.982uV
Vout_GT2
0V
0
R16
10k
R7
22k
0VVEE
VCC
0V
C9
10n
0V
15.99uV
VCC
Rload_GT2
100k
0
15.00VR6
22k
R15
33k
GT-2The speaker emulator
-15.00V
U3A
TL072/301/TI
3
2
84
1+
-
V+
V-
OUT
0V
R8
22k
C7
47n
6.511uV-1.982uV
C13
2.2n
0
0V
-991.2nV
0
-991.2nV
15.00V
R5
10k
0V
Figur 4 GT2 Speaker emulator The above circuits are placed in the signal path after the clipping stages. The purpose of both emulators is to remove unwanted higher order harmonic content from the clipped signal, resulting in a signal with a harmonic content similar to the signal from a mic’ed tube guitar amplifier. Basically, the DRP-1 and the GT2 circuits both are 4 order Sallen Key lowpass filters – implemented by using 2 2 order Sallen Key lowpass filters. Only difference is the GT2 having an extra pole and zero made by R5 and C7. The GT2 also has a passive 6 dB attenuation stage at the input in order to prevent the big voltage swing from the clipping op-amp overdriving the filter. The 6 dB attenuation is made by R8 in parallel with the filter Zin, and R16.
Analysing The GT2 & DRP-1 – active filter sections
Frequency
1.0Hz 3.0Hz 10Hz 30Hz 100Hz 300Hz 1.0KHz 3.0KHz 10KHz 30KHz 100KHzVdb(Vout_DRP1) Vdb(Vout_GT2)
-60
-40
-20
-0
-70
Figur 5 Frequency response, DRP-1 and GT-2 The DRP-1 has a standard lowpass Chebychev frequency characteristic, with a peak. The GT2 has max peak at – 6 dB, before having a fairly straight – 15 dB damping, before rolling off without a peak.