Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws - vsb.czhomel.vsb.cz/~zap150/pa/ref/Gustafson.pdf1 Contents 2...
28
Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws Jan Zapletal V ˇ SB - Technical University of Ostrava [email protected] November 23, 2009 Jan Zapletal (V ˇ SB-TUO) Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws November 23, 2009 1 / 13
Transcript of Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws - vsb.czhomel.vsb.cz/~zap150/pa/ref/Gustafson.pdf1 Contents 2...
Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws
Jan Zapletal
VSB - Technical University of [email protected]
November 23, 2009
Jan Zapletal (VSB-TUO) Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws November 23, 2009 1 / 13
1 Contents
2 Introduction
3 Amdahl’s law
4 Gustafson’s law
5 Equivalence of laws
6 References
Jan Zapletal (VSB-TUO) Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws November 23, 2009 2 / 13
Performance analysis
How does the parallelization improve the performance of our program?
Metrics used to desribe the performance:
I execution time,
I speedup,
I efficiency,
I cost...
Jan Zapletal (VSB-TUO) Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws November 23, 2009 3 / 13
Performance analysis
How does the parallelization improve the performance of our program?
Metrics used to desribe the performance:
I execution time,
I speedup,
I efficiency,
I cost...
Jan Zapletal (VSB-TUO) Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws November 23, 2009 3 / 13
Metrics
Execution time
I The time elapsed from when the first processor starts the execution towhen the last processor completes it.
I On a parallel system consists of computation time, communicationtime and idle time.
Speedup
I Defined as
S =T1
Tp,
where T1 is the execution time for a sequential system and Tp for theparallel system.
Jan Zapletal (VSB-TUO) Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws November 23, 2009 4 / 13
Metrics
Execution time
I The time elapsed from when the first processor starts the execution towhen the last processor completes it.
I On a parallel system consists of computation time, communicationtime and idle time.
Speedup
I Defined as
S =T1
Tp,
where T1 is the execution time for a sequential system and Tp for theparallel system.
Jan Zapletal (VSB-TUO) Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws November 23, 2009 4 / 13
Amdahl’s law
Gene Myron Amdahl (born November 16, 1922)I worked for IBM,I best known for formulating Amdahl’s law uncovering the limits of
parallel computing.
Let T1 denote the computation time on a sequential system. We can splitthe total time as follows
T1 = ts + tp,
whereI ts - computation time needed for the sequential part.I tp - computation time needed for the parallel part.
Clearly, if we parallelize the problem, only tp can be reduced. Assumingideal parallelization we get
Tp = ts +tpN
,
whereI N - number of processors.
Jan Zapletal (VSB-TUO) Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws November 23, 2009 5 / 13
Amdahl’s law
Gene Myron Amdahl (born November 16, 1922)I worked for IBM,I best known for formulating Amdahl’s law uncovering the limits of
parallel computing.
Let T1 denote the computation time on a sequential system. We can splitthe total time as follows
T1 = ts + tp,
whereI ts - computation time needed for the sequential part.I tp - computation time needed for the parallel part.
Clearly, if we parallelize the problem, only tp can be reduced. Assumingideal parallelization we get
Tp = ts +tpN
,
whereI N - number of processors.
Jan Zapletal (VSB-TUO) Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws November 23, 2009 5 / 13
Amdahl’s law
Gene Myron Amdahl (born November 16, 1922)I worked for IBM,I best known for formulating Amdahl’s law uncovering the limits of
parallel computing.
Let T1 denote the computation time on a sequential system. We can splitthe total time as follows
T1 = ts + tp,
whereI ts - computation time needed for the sequential part.I tp - computation time needed for the parallel part.
Clearly, if we parallelize the problem, only tp can be reduced. Assumingideal parallelization we get
Tp = ts +tpN
,
whereI N - number of processors.
Jan Zapletal (VSB-TUO) Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws November 23, 2009 5 / 13
Amdahl’s law
Thus we get the speedup of
S =T1
Tp=
ts + tp
ts +tpN
.
Let f denote the sequential portion of the computation, i.e.
f =ts
ts + tp.
Thus the speedup formula can be simplified into
S =1
f + 1−fN
<1
f.
I Notice that Amdahl assumes the problem size does not change withthe number of CPUs.
I Wants to solve a fixed-size problem as quickly as possible.
Jan Zapletal (VSB-TUO) Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws November 23, 2009 6 / 13
Amdahl’s law
Thus we get the speedup of
S =T1
Tp=
ts + tp
ts +tpN
.
Let f denote the sequential portion of the computation, i.e.
f =ts
ts + tp.
Thus the speedup formula can be simplified into
S =1
f + 1−fN
<1
f.
I Notice that Amdahl assumes the problem size does not change withthe number of CPUs.
I Wants to solve a fixed-size problem as quickly as possible.
Jan Zapletal (VSB-TUO) Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws November 23, 2009 6 / 13
Amdahl’s law
Thus we get the speedup of
S =T1
Tp=
ts + tp
ts +tpN
.
Let f denote the sequential portion of the computation, i.e.
f =ts
ts + tp.
Thus the speedup formula can be simplified into
S =1
f + 1−fN
<1
f.
I Notice that Amdahl assumes the problem size does not change withthe number of CPUs.
I Wants to solve a fixed-size problem as quickly as possible.
Jan Zapletal (VSB-TUO) Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws November 23, 2009 6 / 13
Amdahl’s law
Jan Zapletal (VSB-TUO) Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws November 23, 2009 7 / 13
Gustafson’s law
John L. Gustafson (born January 19, 1955)
I American computer scientist and businessman,
I found out that practital problems show much better speedup thanAmdahl predicted.
Gustafson’s law
I The computation time is constant (instead of the problem size),
I increasing number of CPUs ⇒ solve bigger problem and get betterresults in the same time.
Let Tp denote the computation time on a parallel system. We can split thetotal time as follows
Tp = t∗s + t∗p ,
where
I t∗s - computation time needed for the sequential part.
I t∗p - computation time needed for the parallel part.
Jan Zapletal (VSB-TUO) Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws November 23, 2009 8 / 13
Gustafson’s law
John L. Gustafson (born January 19, 1955)
I American computer scientist and businessman,
I found out that practital problems show much better speedup thanAmdahl predicted.
Gustafson’s law
I The computation time is constant (instead of the problem size),
I increasing number of CPUs ⇒ solve bigger problem and get betterresults in the same time.
Let Tp denote the computation time on a parallel system. We can split thetotal time as follows
Tp = t∗s + t∗p ,
where
I t∗s - computation time needed for the sequential part.
I t∗p - computation time needed for the parallel part.
Jan Zapletal (VSB-TUO) Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws November 23, 2009 8 / 13
Gustafson’s law
John L. Gustafson (born January 19, 1955)
I American computer scientist and businessman,
I found out that practital problems show much better speedup thanAmdahl predicted.
Gustafson’s law
I The computation time is constant (instead of the problem size),
I increasing number of CPUs ⇒ solve bigger problem and get betterresults in the same time.
Let Tp denote the computation time on a parallel system. We can split thetotal time as follows
Tp = t∗s + t∗p ,
where
I t∗s - computation time needed for the sequential part.
I t∗p - computation time needed for the parallel part.
Jan Zapletal (VSB-TUO) Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws November 23, 2009 8 / 13
Gustafson’s law
On a sequential system we would get
T1 = t∗s + N · t∗p .
Thus the speedup will be
S =t∗s + N · t∗p
t∗s + t∗p.
Let f ∗ denote the sequential portion of the computation on the parallelsystem, i.e.
f ∗ =t∗s
t∗s + t∗p.
ThenS = f ∗ + N · (1− f ∗).
Jan Zapletal (VSB-TUO) Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws November 23, 2009 9 / 13
Gustafson’s law
On a sequential system we would get
T1 = t∗s + N · t∗p .
Thus the speedup will be
S =t∗s + N · t∗p
t∗s + t∗p.
Let f ∗ denote the sequential portion of the computation on the parallelsystem, i.e.
f ∗ =t∗s
t∗s + t∗p.
ThenS = f ∗ + N · (1− f ∗).
Jan Zapletal (VSB-TUO) Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws November 23, 2009 9 / 13
Gustafson’s law
On a sequential system we would get
T1 = t∗s + N · t∗p .
Thus the speedup will be
S =t∗s + N · t∗p
t∗s + t∗p.
Let f ∗ denote the sequential portion of the computation on the parallelsystem, i.e.
f ∗ =t∗s
t∗s + t∗p.
ThenS = f ∗ + N · (1− f ∗).
Jan Zapletal (VSB-TUO) Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws November 23, 2009 9 / 13
Gustafson’s law
Jan Zapletal (VSB-TUO) Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws November 23, 2009 10 / 13
What the hell?!
I The bigger the problem, the smaller f - serial part remains usualy thesame,
I and f 6= f ∗.
Amdahl’s says:
S =ts + tp
ts +tpN
.
Let now f ∗ denote the sequential portion spent in the parallelcomputation, i.e.
f ∗ =ts
ts +tpN
and (1− f ∗) =tpN
ts +tpN
.
Hence
ts = f ∗ ·(
ts +tpN
)and tp = N · (1− f ∗) ·
(ts +
tpN
).
Jan Zapletal (VSB-TUO) Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws November 23, 2009 11 / 13
What the hell?!
I The bigger the problem, the smaller f - serial part remains usualy thesame,
I and f 6= f ∗.
Amdahl’s says:
S =ts + tp
ts +tpN
.
Let now f ∗ denote the sequential portion spent in the parallelcomputation, i.e.
f ∗ =ts
ts +tpN
and (1− f ∗) =tpN
ts +tpN
.
Hence
ts = f ∗ ·(
ts +tpN
)and tp = N · (1− f ∗) ·
(ts +
tpN
).
Jan Zapletal (VSB-TUO) Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws November 23, 2009 11 / 13
What the hell?!
I The bigger the problem, the smaller f - serial part remains usualy thesame,
I and f 6= f ∗.
Amdahl’s says:
S =ts + tp
ts +tpN
.
Let now f ∗ denote the sequential portion spent in the parallelcomputation, i.e.
f ∗ =ts
ts +tpN
and (1− f ∗) =tpN
ts +tpN
.
Hence
ts = f ∗ ·(
ts +tpN
)and tp = N · (1− f ∗) ·
(ts +
tpN
).
Jan Zapletal (VSB-TUO) Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws November 23, 2009 11 / 13
I see!
I After substituting ts and tp into the Amdahl’s formula one gets
S =ts + tp
ts +tpN
= f ∗ + N · (1− f ∗),
what is exactly what Gustafson derived.
I The key is not to mix up the values f and f ∗ - this caused greatconfusion that lasted over years!
Jan Zapletal (VSB-TUO) Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws November 23, 2009 12 / 13
I see!
I After substituting ts and tp into the Amdahl’s formula one gets
S =ts + tp
ts +tpN
= f ∗ + N · (1− f ∗),
what is exactly what Gustafson derived.
I The key is not to mix up the values f and f ∗ - this caused greatconfusion that lasted over years!
Jan Zapletal (VSB-TUO) Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws November 23, 2009 12 / 13
I see!
I After substituting ts and tp into the Amdahl’s formula one gets
S =ts + tp
ts +tpN
= f ∗ + N · (1− f ∗),
what is exactly what Gustafson derived.
I The key is not to mix up the values f and f ∗ - this caused greatconfusion that lasted over years!
Jan Zapletal (VSB-TUO) Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws November 23, 2009 12 / 13
References
QUINN, Michael Jay. Parallel programming in C with MPI andOpenMP. New York : McGraw - Hill, 2004. 507 s.
Amdahl’s law [online]. Available at:<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amdahl’s law>.
Gustafson’s law [online]. Available at:<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustafson’s law>.
Thank you for your attention!
Jan Zapletal (VSB-TUO) Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws November 23, 2009 13 / 13
References
QUINN, Michael Jay. Parallel programming in C with MPI andOpenMP. New York : McGraw - Hill, 2004. 507 s.
Amdahl’s law [online]. Available at:<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amdahl’s law>.
Gustafson’s law [online]. Available at:<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustafson’s law>.
Thank you for your attention!
Jan Zapletal (VSB-TUO) Amdahl’s and Gustafson’s laws November 23, 2009 13 / 13
