“Academic/Practitioner Knowledge Sharing inside Higher Education Institutions” A brief overview...
-
Upload
conrad-austin -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
2
Transcript of “Academic/Practitioner Knowledge Sharing inside Higher Education Institutions” A brief overview...
“Academic/Practitioner Knowledge Sharing inside Higher Education Institutions”
A brief overview – (we’re here to listen!)
Introductions
• Julie Lister, Lecturer in HRM, University of Westminster – [email protected]
• Dr Kathryn Waddington, Director of Interprofessional Practice Programmes, School of Health Sciences, City University, London – ([email protected])
“Academic/Practitioner Knowledge Sharing inside Higher Education Institutions” - Objectives
Identify examples of positive collaborations and knowledge
sharing
Investigate organisational barriers to, and enablers of, such
collaborations
Promote the potential benefits to HEIs that may not have
considered this as an approach to helping them harness
more of their collective talents
Disseminate examples of positive experiences and outcomes
Distil and disseminate practical guidance on overcoming
organisational barriers to collaborative working.
“Helping the HEI to access more of its collective talents”
• Potential for cost savings through optimisation of resources
• Improved working relationships with improved appreciation of academic/practitioner perspectives
• Enrichment of learning• Easier for some staff to relate to student
experience.
Professional Groupings
• Those with directly corresponding academic departments: Estates, HRM, IT, Law, Marketing
• Also cross-functional/disciplinary knowledge sharing
• Examples....
Approach
• Return to original (SDP 1) sample to establish similarities/differences between HRM & other groups
• Survey wider sample via on-line questionnaire with follow-up telephone interviews.
The Challenge
• Identifying:– professional groupings– target respondents
Discussion
• Share examples of knowledge sharing from Group members
• Discussion of organisational factors influencing selection of groupings and respondents.