8 Signal Coordination

download 8 Signal Coordination

of 37

Transcript of 8 Signal Coordination

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    1/37

    Traffic EngineeringTopic: Signal Coordination

    Dr. Henry Liu

    CE 4211/5211 Traffic Engineering

    University of Minnesota

    email: [email protected]

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    2/37

    Signal Coordination

    For situations with relatively closely spacedintersections

    Vehicles commonly maintain their grouping

    for well over 1000 feet. Common practice is

    to coordinate signals less than mile apart

    on major streets and highways

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    3/37

    L

    L

    TimeEqually Spaced Intersections

    1

    2

    3

    Speed

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    4/37

    L

    L

    TimeEqually Spaced Intersections

    1

    2

    3 Stop Delay

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    5/37

    L

    L

    TimeEqually Spaced Intersections

    1

    2

    3Stop Delay

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    6/37

    L

    L

    TimeEqually Spaced Intersections

    1

    2

    3

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    7/37

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    8/37

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    9/37

    Benefits Prime benefit: reduction in stops and delays

    It is common to consider the benefit of a coordination

    plan in terms of costs as a weighted combination of stopsand delay:

    Cost = A X (total stops) + B X (total delay) + other terms

    A and B are decisions of the local jurisdiction

    Encourage preferred speed: signals set such that to

    incur more stops for speeds faster than the design speed Set up platoons (shorter headways)

    Stop fewer vehicles, esp important for short blocks withheavy flows which may overflow the available storage

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    10/37

    Purpose Usually the physical layout of the street systemand the major traffic flows determine the purpose

    Consider the type of system: 1-way, 2-way, or

    mixed network Consider the movement to be progressed:examine tradeoff

    Set an objective: max bandwidth, min delay, minstops, and combinations?

    Understand limitations

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    11/37

    Factors lessening benefits

    Inadequate roadway capacity

    Existence of substantial side frictions, includingparking, loading, double parking, and multiple driveways

    Complicated intersections, multiphase control

    Very short signal spacing

    Heavy turn volumes, either into or out of the street

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    12/37

    Exceptions to the coordinated

    scheme

    Easy coordination may not always be possible. Forexample, a very busy intersection located in not ascongested area. The engineer may not want to use the cycletime of the busy intersection as the common cycle time.

    Another example is the existence of a critical intersectionthat causes queue spillback.

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    13/37

    The time-space diagram

    and ideal offsets Offset: the difference between the green initiation

    times at two adjacent intersections.

    usually expressed as a positive number betweenzero and the cycle length.

    Often, the ideal offset: the value such that thefirst vehicle of a platoon just arrives at the downstreamsignal, the downstream signal turns green.

    t(ideal) = L/S where L = block length, S= vehiclespeed

    Offset = mod C {OFFSET}

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    14/37

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    15/37

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    16/37

    Offset determination on a

    two-way street The fact that the offsets are interrelated presentsone of the most fundamental problems of signaloptimization.

    Actual offsets and travel times are distinct. While theengineer might desire the ideal offset to be the same as

    the travel time

    In link i, the actual offsets are related by:

    Define the actual offset and ideal offset by:

    where j represents the direction, and i the link

    nCtt iSBiNB =+ ,,

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    17/37

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    18/37

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    19/37

    Offset Optimization Define the actual offset and ideal offset by:

    where j represents the direction, and i the link

    In a number of signal optimization programs thatcan be used for two-way arterials, the objective is tominimize some functions of the discrepancies betweenthe actual and ideal offsets.

    The simplest form is perhaps the sum of thesquares or of the discrepancies, weighted by the link

    volumes:

    ),(),(),( ijett ijidealijactual +=

    = ij ijidealijactual ttijvZ ,2

    ),(),( ])][,([

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    20/37

    The bandwidth concept and

    maximum bandwidth

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    21/37

    Bandwidth and efficiency of a

    progression

    Efficiency defined as:

    Efficiency =(bandwidth/cycle length) X 100%

    An efficiency of 40-55% is considered as good.

    The bandwidth is limited by the min green in thedirection of interest.

    Nonstop volume =3600 (BW) (L)/h/C vph

    Where BW = measured or computed bandwidth (s); L= number of through lanes; h = headway (s/veh), C =

    cycle length (s)

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    22/37

    Effective progressions on 2-

    way Streets

    If an appropriate combination of cycle length,block length, and platoon speed, then the task of goodprogression in both directions becomes easy

    Therefore, whenever possible, in new town or newdevelopment, these appropriate combinations mustbe considered seriously.

    Green Band in

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    23/37

    CC

    C

    C

    L

    L

    TimeEqually Spaced Intersections

    Green Band in

    North Direction

    (NEMA 2)

    Green Band in

    South Direction(NEMA6)

    Offset of Int. 2

    Relative to Int. 3

    (Ref. to Start of Green)

    1

    2

    3

    Offset of Int. 2Relative to System Time

    (Ref. to Start of Green)

    Yield Point of Int. 2

    Relative to System Time

    (Ref. to Start of Green)

    Green Band in

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    24/37

    Green Band in

    South

    Direction

    (NEMA6)

    CC

    C

    L

    L

    TimeEqually Spaced Intersections

    Green Band in

    North Direction

    (NEMA 2)

    1

    2

    3

    C

    L S=2L/CC=2L/S

    Offset of Int. 2

    Relative to Int. 3

    (Ref. to Start of Green)

    C

    L

    OFFSET=C/2

    C

    L

    Old Green Band in

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    25/37

    C

    C

    C

    TimeUnequally Spaced Intersections

    1

    3

    2

    Old Green Band in

    South Direction(NEMA6)

    Old Green Band in

    North Direction

    (NEMA 2) New Green Band

    in

    South Direction

    (NEMA6)

    New Green Band in

    North Direction

    (NEMA 2)

    2

    L

    L

    L2

    L1

    Regain Green Band in

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    26/37

    C

    C

    C

    L2

    L1

    Time

    1

    3

    2

    Regain Green Band in

    North Direction

    (NEMA 2)

    Lose Green Band in

    South Direction

    (NEMA6)

    New Green Band

    in

    South Direction

    (NEMA6)

    New Green Band in

    North Direction

    (NEMA 2)

    Move Offset

    ORIGINAL PHASING DIAGRAM

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    27/37

    ORIGINAL PHASING DIAGRAM

    for Intersection 2

    (Equally-Spaced Intersections)

    REVISED PHASING DIAGRAM

    for Intersection 2

    (Unequally-Spaced Intersections)

    Regain Green Band in

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    28/37

    C

    C

    C

    L2

    L1

    Time

    1

    3

    2

    g

    North Direction

    (NEMA 2)

    Regain Green Band in

    South Direction

    (NEMA6)

    Adjust Phasing

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    29/37

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    30/37

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    31/37

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    32/37

    Actuated Signal CoordinationNew Concepts:

    1. Background Cycle Length

    2. Yield Point

    3. Sync Phase4. Force Off

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    33/37

    1. To provide synchronization and maintain the backgroundcycle length, all coordinated intersection have the same

    system clock reference point, which is usually the start point

    of signal coordination plan.

    2. The sync phase of every coordinated intersection has fixed

    series of yield points, and the difference between yield points

    is the background cycle length.

    3. These yield points are also local clock reference points toother non-sync phases. The sync phase has minimal

    bandwidth, i.e. the sync phase has to start at the time of

    minimal bandwidth earlier than yield point.4. To do so, all other phases have to be cut at certain points,

    which are so-called force-off points. These force-off points

    are usually referenced to the local clock reference point.

    Yield PointLocal Clock Reference Point = 0 sec

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    34/37

    Background Cycle Length

    System Clock Reference Point = 0 sec

    Sync Phase (usually NEMA 2)

    Initial (Minimum)

    Green

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    35/37

    Phase Interval Times

    Interval Phase

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

    Walk

    Ped Clear

    Initial 6 14 6 8 9 10 6 10

    Extension 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0

    Max Green 20 50 15 35 20 50 15 35

    Yellow 3 5 3 4 3 5 3 4

    Red 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

    Permit

    Max Recall

    Min Recall

    Ped Recall

    Lag Phase

    Yield Point = 70 secLocal Clock Reference Point = 0 sec

    Check barrier: F.O. 1 < F.O.6 + 2 = 43 sec

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    36/37

    4

    Background Cycle Length = 120 sec

    System Clock Reference Point = 0 sec

    NEMA 2 Bandwidth = 48 sec

    6 6 6 4 8 5

    9 4 10 6 6 4 10 5

    F.O. 1 < 120 - 4 - 6 - 4 - 8 - 5 - 48 = 45 sec

    14 sec

    F.O. 3 < 120 - 4 - 8 - 5 - 48 = 55 sec

    F.O. 4 < 120 - 5 - 48 = 67 sec

    F.O. 8 = F.O. 4 < 120 - 5 - 48 = 67 sec

    F.O. 7 < F.O. 8 - 10 - 4 = 67 - 14 = 53 sec

    F.O. 6 = F.O.7 - 12 = 53 12 = 41 sec

    NEMA 6 Bandwidth = 40 sec

    F.O. 5 = F.O. 6 - 40 sec -4 sec

    = 41 44 = -3 = 117 sec

    Yield Point = 70 secLocal Clock Reference Point = 0 sec

  • 7/25/2019 8 Signal Coordination

    37/37

    4 46 6

    4

    Background Cycle Length = 120 sec

    System Clock Reference Point = 0 sec

    6 6 6 4 8 5

    9 10 10 5

    NEMA 2 Bandwidth = 48 sec

    14 sec

    F.O. 1 (< 43 sec) = 33 - 10 - 4 = 19 sec

    F.O. 3 (< 55 sec) = 67 - 30 - 4 = 33 sec

    F.O. 4 (< 67 sec) = 67 sec

    F.O. 8 = F.O. 4 = 67 sec

    F.O. 7 (< F.O. 8 - 14 sec) = 67 - 34 - 4 = 29 sec

    F.O. 6 = F.O. 1 - 2 sec = 17 sec

    NEMA 6 Bandwidth = 40 sec

    F.O. 5 = F.O. 6 - 40 sec -4 sec

    = 17 - 40 - 4 = - 27 sec

    = 120 - 27 = 93 sec

    13 1030

    3464021

    Hypothetical Intersection