2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

65
ครั้งที่ กรกฎาคม ๒๕๕๓ 1 Thursday, 24 June 2010

description

สไลด์ประกอบการบรรยายวิชา น.๗๘๖ ครั้งที่ ๓ (๑ กรกฎาคม ๒๕๕๓)

Transcript of 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

Page 1: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

ครั้งที่ ๓๑ กรกฎาคม ๒๕๕๓

1Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 2: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

เทคนิคการเปรียบเทียบกฎหมาย

2Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 3: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

an introduction

ข้อควรพิจารณาในการเปรียบเทียบระบบศาล

ข้อควรพิจารณาเกี่ยวกับกฎหมายปกครอง

3Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 4: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

an introduction

4Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 5: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

Peter de Cruz, "Techniques of comparative law", in Comparative law in a changing world (London, 2007), pp. 219-249.

5Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 6: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

•major pitfalls & perils

•quest for methodology

•methods

6Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 7: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

• linguistic & terminological problems

• cultural differences

• objects of study

• comparability

• legal pattern

• bias

• exclusion & ignorance

major pitfalls & perils

7Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 8: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

linguistic & terminological

problems

8Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 9: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

cultural differences between legal systems

9Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 10: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

arbitrary selection of objects of study

10Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 11: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

comparability in comparison

11Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 12: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

viability of theory of a common legal pattern

12Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 13: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

imposition of one’s own legal conceptions

13Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 14: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

the four ‘law jobs’

•social control

•conflict resolution

•adaptation & social change

•norm enforcement

14Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 15: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

omission of extra-legal factors

15Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 16: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

the quest for methodology

• general character of comparative law

• subject matter

• macro v micro

• suitability of topics

• comparative method requirements

• test of functionality

16Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 17: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

clarifying the general character of

comparative law

17Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 18: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

the subject matter of the comparison

18Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 19: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

macro-comparison & micro-comparison

19Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 20: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

comparative method: requirements

20Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 21: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

the test of functionality

21Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 22: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

comparative legal methods

•Kamba’s three-stage approach

•a blueprint

22Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 23: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

Kamba’s three-stage-approach

23Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 24: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

•the descriptive phase

•the identification phase

•the explanatory phase

24Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 25: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

• norms

• concepts

• institutions

• socio-economic problems

• legal problems

• legal solutions

the descriptive phase

25Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 26: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

the identification phase

•differences

• similarities

26Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 27: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

the explanatory phase

• resemblances

•dissimilarities

27Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 28: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

“no one single method applicable”

28Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 29: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

a blueprint

29Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 30: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

1. Identify the problem.

2. Identify the foreign jurisdiction & its parent legal family.

3. Decide the primary sources of law & materials.

4. Gather & assemble the material relevant to the jurisdiction being examined.

5. Organise the material.

6. Provisinally map out the possible answers to the problem.

7. Critically analyse the legal principles.

8. Set out conclusions within the comparative framework with caveats & with critical commentary.

30Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 31: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

คําถาม?

31Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 32: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

ข้อควรพิจารณาในการเปรียบเทียบระบบศาล

32Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 33: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

• comparative law in courts

• comparative law & legislator

• comparativism & the verdict

• case law in non-common law jurisdictions

• styles of judicial decision

• overriding general principles

33Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 34: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

comparative law in courts

34Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 35: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

•a tool of interpretation

•a tool of law reform

35Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 36: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

sovereigntyv

“uniformity of outcome”

36Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 37: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

“comparison illuminate our understanding”

37Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 38: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

“The discipline of comparative does not aim at a poll of solutions adopted in different countries. It has the different and inestimable value of sharpening our focus on the weight of competing consideration.”

38Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 39: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

functional use of foreign law

• a tool of interpretation

• to look for solutions

• to promote a change

• to fill in a gap

• to discard an unsatisfactory solution

39Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 40: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

the three phases

•discovering: what is found

•understanding: what is to be used

•applying: how far

40Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 41: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

certain practical considerations

• language skills

• national insularity or pride: rule of proof; common law as a whole

• pressures: time & volume of work

• budget

41Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 42: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

“[A]ll judges cannot be expected to be

comparatists, but it is their duty to consult those who are in a

position to supply the information needed ...”

42Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 43: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

“[It] cannot be right to attempt to construe

‘acquiesced’ by reference only to its possible meaning at

common law or equity.”

43Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 44: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

comparative law & legislator

44Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 45: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

•a tool of interpretation

•a tool of law reform

45Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 46: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

justification of comparativism &

the verdict

46Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 47: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

the authority of case law in non-common law

jurisdictions

47Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 48: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

interpreters v

law makers

48Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 49: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

lower courtsv

superior courts

49Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 50: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

styles of judicial decision

50Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 51: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

•English

•French

•German

•Swedish

•American

51Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 52: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

the relevance of overriding general

principles

52Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 53: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

• aequitas

• bona fides/good faith

• good morals and public order

• custom

53Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 54: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

คําถาม?

54Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 55: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

ข้อควรพิจารณาเกี่ยวกับกฎหมายปกครอง

55Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 56: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

Administrative law?

The subjects?

Power allocation?

The procedure?

The instutions?

The judicial control?

Liability?

56Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 57: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

What is administrative law?

57Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 58: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

What are the subjects of administrative law?

58Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 59: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

the allocation of powers

59Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 60: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

administrative procedure

60Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 61: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

institutions providing legal redress

61Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 62: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

the judicial control of power

62Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 63: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

liability of the administration

63Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 64: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

conclusion

64Thursday, 24 June 2010

Page 65: 2553 la786 week 3 class (1 july 2010) slideshow

คําถาม?

65Thursday, 24 June 2010