2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic...

75
St. Catherine University and University of St. Thomas School of Social Work BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W.

Transcript of 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic...

Page 1: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

St. Catherine University and University of St. Thomas

School of Social Work

BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year

Final Report

Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W.

Page 2: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

2

2

Table of Contents

Explicit Curriculum……………………………………………………………………….4 Field Evaluations………………………………………………………………….4 COAT Survey……………………………………………………………………..4 Outcomes for the 2012-2013 Academic Year…………………………………………….5

Formative Results (Juniors)……………………………………………………….5

Summative Results (Senior Outcomes)………………………………….……….8 Field Ratings……………… ……………………………………….……8 Field Ratings of Senior Students’ Specific Competencies….…………….9 Course Objective Assessment Tool (COAT)…………………………….13 COAT Ratings on Benchmarks………………………………………….15 Summary of Field and COAT Ratings for 2012-2013 Seniors………….16 Implicit Curriculum…………………………..……..…………………………………...19

Academic Advising………………………………………………………………22 Student Participation……………………………………………………………..22 Resources………………………………………………………………………...23

Appendix A

Junior BSW Fieldwork Evaluation………………………………………………25 Appendix B Senior BSW Fieldwork Evaluation…………….……………………………….35 Appendix C COAT Survey……………………………………………………………………45 Appendix D

2012-2013 Field Ratings of Practice Behavior……………………………….….64 Appendix E

2012-2013 COAT Ratings of Practice Behaviors………………………………..68 Appendix F

Climate Survey (Implicit Curriculum)……………………………………….…..71

Appendix G Changes Made to Curriculum as a Result of 2102-2013 Outcome Study……….75 (to be completed summer 2014 and incorporate changes made as a result of this )report

Page 3: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

3

3

Table of Tables

Table 1. Overall Rating of Competence by Field Work Instructors…………………...…5

Table 2. Junior Field Ratings for 2011-2012……………………………………..………5

Table 3: Junior Field Ratings Over Time………………………………………………...7

Table 4. Overall Rating of Senior Students’ Competence by Field Work Instructors…...9

Table 5. Mean Ratings on 2012 Senior Students’ Curriculum Competencies Field Year-End Ratings…..9

Table 6. Senior Field Ratings Percentages Above 4.2 for 2012………………………...10

Table 7. Senior Field Ratings Over Time………..……………………………...………12

Table 8. Comparison of Pretest and Posttest COAT Means for 2011-2012…………….14

Table 9. Senior Rating on COAT Over Time……..…………………………………….15

Table 10. Field and COAT Senior Student Ratings for 2011-2012……………………..16

Table 11. Diversity, Social Justice and Respect…………………………………………19

Table 12. Addressing Diversity………………………………………………………….20

Table 13. Demonstrating a Meaningful Commitment to Diversity……………………...20

Table 14. Commitment to Diversity……………………………………………………..20

Table 15. Respect………………………………………………………………………...21

Table 16. Response to Harassment…………………………………………………...….21

Table 17. Satisfaction with Admission Process………………………………………….21

Table 18. Whom Students would Approach……………………………………………..22

Table 19. Advising………………………………………………………………………22

Table 20. Student Opportunities…………………………………………………………22

Table 21. Participation…………………………………………………………………...23

Table 22. Encouragement of Activities………………………………………………….23

Table 22. Support Systems Used by Students…………………………………………...23

Page 4: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

4

4

BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year

The BSW outcome assessment is conducted annually. Explicit curriculum is evaluated in three parts, evaluation of competencies rated in three ways. Students complete the year-end field evaluation and self-rate practice behaviors. Field instructors (FI) complete the same field evaluation for each student, rating them on the same practice behaviors. Students also self-rate on a course objective assessment tool (COAT), a measure of a number of skills that are compounded into practice behaviors at the beginning of their social work classes and again on the same survey right before graduation. The ratings of the various practice behaviors are averaged by competency to provide competency ratings for our 14 BSW competencies. Implicit curriculum is measured through a survey of graduating students’ perception of school climate.

Explicit Curriculum Field Evaluations.

The field evaluations are completed by students as a self-rating and field instructor (FI) ratings of the same practice behaviors. This measure is given at the end of the academic year to both juniors and seniors (See Appendices A and B). The ratings of individual practice behaviors are averaged together to provide an aggregate rating on competencies.

Formative information is compiled for junior students in field at the end of junior year. Because the BSW Program does not expect students to be competent at the end of junior year, the highest rating possible on that instrument is a 3 (student is gaining experience and meeting expectations in this area). The benchmark for junior field ratings is that at least 80% of the students will rate at 2.8 or above. At the end of the junior field placement, the FI also provides a summary rating that indicates whether the student has met the overall requirements for the junior year field placement on a four-point scale ranging from “not being ready to move on” to “performing above expectations.” The benchmark is that 95% of the juniors will be rated by FWI as having met this standard.

Summative field ratings are obtained on senior students before graduation. The benchmark for senior students is a rating of 4.2 or above by at least 75% of the students. There is also a final summary rating that the FI provides that indicates whether a student has met the overall requirements for the year’s field placement on a four-point scale ranging from “demonstrating serious problems in performance” to “performing above expectations.” The benchmark is that 90% of seniors will be rated by FWI as having met this standard. COAT Survey The COAT survey is a self-rating given to students in their first academic course and again just before graduation (See Appendix C). The COAT was derived from course objectives (which were, in turn, derived from practice behaviors that compose the competencies). It consists of 97 questions that measure 52 practice behaviors. These are averaged by competency to determine the ratings on the 14 competencies. There are two benchmarks related to the COAT survey. The first is that there will be a statistically

Page 5: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

5

5

significant change in perceived competence ratings between entering and exiting the program. The second benchmark is that at least 75% of exiting seniors will rate themselves an average score of 4.2 or higher on each competency.

Field Outcomes for the 2012-2013 Academic Year Both students and field instructors rate students on the practice behaviors as part of the year-end evaluation (See Appendices A and B). In addition, field instructors rate students in an overall rating of their competence on a four-point rating scale. Formative Results (Juniors) The benchmark is that 95% of the juniors will be rated by FWI as having met this standard. For the 2012-13 academic year, students were rated as having met this competency by 100% by field instructors in final overall ratings Table 1. Overall Rating of Competence by Field Work Instructors

Competency % at

MC or above

JR Students: 95% of students will receive an overall rating of MC or above. (“This student has met the expectations of the junior field placement. This student is ready for a senior field placement.”)

100%

The ratings of FI and student self-ratings are aggregated into competencies. The benchmark for junior students is that 80% or more will be rated by FI and self-rate 2.5 or above on a scale of 3 at the end of junior year. The rating categories are:

1. The student has not met the expectations in this area, and there is not much evidence that the student will meet the expectations in this area in the near future

2. The student has not as yet met the expectations in this area, but there is evidence that the student will meet the expectations in the near future.

3. The student is gaining experience and meeting expectations in this area. Table 2. Junior Field Ratings for 2012-2013

Competency Jr. Field

Student Jr. Field Self-Rating % 2.5 or above *

Jr. Field FI Rating Jr. FI Rating % 2.5 or above *

Status of Competency

C2.1.1 Identify as a professional social worker and conduct oneself accordingly.

95% 98% Met

Page 6: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

6

6

C2.1.2 Apply social work ethical principles to guide professional practice.

92% 98% Met

C2.1.3 Apply critical thinking to inform and communicate professional judgments.

84% 92% Met

C2.1.4 Engage diversity and difference in practice.

95% 98% Met

C2.1.5 Advance human rights and social and economic justice.

79% 92% Partially Met

C2.1.6 Engage in research-informed practice and practice-informed research.

76% 85% Partially Met

C2.1.7 Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment.

84% 89% Met

C2.1.8 Engage in policy practice to advance social and economic well-being and to deliver effective social work.

73% 81% Partially Met

C2.1.9 Respond to contexts that shape practice.

63% 80% Partially Met

C1.1.10A Engage with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

92% 97% Met

C1.1.10B. Assess client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

87% 95% Met

C1.1.10C Provide prevention/intervention for client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

77% 94% Partially Met

C1.1.10D Evaluate practice with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

69% 87% Partially Met

C1.1.10E End with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

70% 85% Partially Met

* Benchmark=80% 2.5 or above; When looking at the individual competencies, there were a number of competencies that were not completely met, including the following. These competencies were rated 2.5 or above by either the FI or the student but not by both. Junior students partially met the following competencies: C2.1.5 Advance human rights and social and economic justice. C2.1.6 Engage in research-informed practice and practice-informed research. C2.1.8 Engage in policy practice to advance social and economic well-being and to deliver effective social work. C2.1.9 Respond to contexts that shape practice. C1.1.10C Provide prevention/intervention for client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities). C1.1.10D Evaluate practice with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities). C1.1.10E End with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

Page 7: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

7

7

Those competencies that were partially met have been referred to the BSW Program Committee, which will consider the objectives in light of our curriculum and make revisions in the curriculum as necessary over the course of the 2013-14 academic year. Table 3: Junior Field Ratings Over Time Competency JR

ST 2011

JR ST 2012

*JR ST 2013

JR FI 2011

JR FI 2012

*JR FI 2013

C2.1.1 Identify as a professional social worker and conduct oneself accordingly.

87% 83% 95% 87% 85% 98%

C2.1.2 Apply social work ethical principles to guide professional practice.

69% 64% 92% 83% 71% 98%

C2.1.3 Apply critical thinking to inform and communicate professional judgments.

77% 66% 84% 77% 88% 92%

C2.1.4 Engage diversity and difference in practice.

93% 85% 95% 94% 86% 98%

C2.1.5 Advance human rights and social and economic justice.

66% 63% 79% 77% 68% 92%

C2.1.6 Engage in research-informed practice and practice-informed research.

58% 47% 76% 76% 47% 85%

C2.1.7 Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment.

77% 73% 84% 79% 83% 89%

C2.1.8 Engage in policy practice to advance social and economic well-being and to deliver effective social work.

69% 61% 73% 75% 64% 81%

C2.1.9 Respond to contexts that shape practice.

60% 68% 63% 66% 63% 80%

C1.1.10A Engage with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

84% 86% 92% 87% 88% 97%

Page 8: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

8

8

C1.1.10B. Assess client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

79% 71% 87% 83% 81% 95%

C1.1.10C Provide prevention/intervention for client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

68% 68% 77% 67% 78% 94%

C1.1.10D Evaluate practice with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

53% 58% 69% 69% 66% 87%

C1.1.10E End with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

73% 68% 70% 82% 75% 85%

* = year benchmark changed We track how our students do on the benchmarks over time. Table 3 above indicates that our junior students fared similarly to those of the previous year, the year when we revised out outcome study. While not all objectives were completely met, it is encouraging to note the growth in ratings of many of these objectives over time on the part of both field instructors and students.

Summative Results (Senior Outcomes)

Field Ratings The evaluation of students by their field instructors (FI) includes a final summary rating that FI provide that indicates whether a student has met the overall requirements for the year’s field placement on a four-point scale ranging from “demonstrating serious problems” to “performing above expectations.” See Appendices D and E for the evaluation instrument.

The benchmark is that 90% of seniors will be rated by FI as having met this standard. For the 2012-13 academic year, students were at “met competent and met standards” or better by 98% of field instructors in final overall ratings, so this benchmark was met.

Page 9: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

9

9

Table 4. Overall Rating of Senior Students’ Competence by Field Work Instructors

Competency % at MC or above

SR Students: 90% of students will receive an overall rating of MC or above (“This student has met the expectations of the senior field placement. This student is ready for generalist social work practice.” - MC = met competent and met standards) or better.

98%

Field Ratings of Senior Students’ Specific Competencies The ratings of FI and student self-ratings are aggregated into competencies. The benchmark for senior students is that 75% or more will be rated by FI and self-rate above 4.2 on a scale of 5 at the end of junior year. The rating categories are:

1. The student has not met the expectations in this area, and there is not much evidence that the student will meet the expectations in this area in the near future

2. The student has not as yet met the expectations in this area, but there is evidence that the student will meet the expectations in the near future.

3. The student is gaining experience and meeting expectations in this area. 4. The student is demonstrating beginning competency in this area. 5. The student is fully competent in this area for beginning generalist social work

practice. Table 5 indicates the mean ratings of senior student self-ratings and the means of field instructor ratings of their students at the end of the academic year. Table 5. Mean Ratings on 2013 Senior Students’ Curriculum Competencies Field Year-End Ratings Curriculum Competency Field

Instructor Assessment (n=54)

Marked "N.A" Survey

Field Student Assessment (n=54)

Marked "N.A."

A2.1.1 Identifying as a professional SW

4.65 (s.d. = .545)

1 4.72 (s.d. = .391)

1

A2.1.2 Applying SW ethical principles

4.66 (s.d. = .523

0 4.66 (s.d. =.464)

0

A2.1.3 Applying critical thinking

4.61 (s.d. = .602)

0 4.70 (s.d. = 4.56)

0

A2.1.4 Engaging diversity 4.73 (s.d. = .473)

0 4.78 (s.d. = .335)

0

A2.1.5 Advancing human rights and justice

4.59 (s.d. = .575)

5 4.57 (s.d. = .546)

5

Page 10: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

10

10

A2.1.6 Engaging research-informed practice and practice-informed research

4.35 (s.d. = .724) 4

4.33 (s.d. = .657)

4

A2.1.7 Applying knowledge of HBSE

4.64 (s.d. = .617)

0 4.71 (s.d. = .463)

0

A2.1.8 Engaging in policy practice

4.54 (s.d. = .681)

6 4.47 (s.d. = .603)

5

A2.1.9 Responding to contexts that shape practice

4.56 (s.d. = .645)

1 4.58 (s.d. = .530)

1

A2.1.10 Engagement, assessment, intervention, and evaluation

A2.1.10 (a) Engagement 4.87 (s.d. = .273)

0 4.85 (s.d. = .293)

0

A2.1.10 (b) Assessment 4.71 (s.d. = .491)

0 4.72 (s.d. = .402)

0

A2.1.10 (c) Intervention 4.65 (s.d. = .496)

0 4.63 (s.d. = .460)

0

A2.1.10 (d) Evaluation 4.61 (s.d. = .613)

1 4.61 (s.d. = .537)

1

A2.1.10 (e) 4.65 (s.d. = .492)

0 4.63 (s.d. = .506)

0

The benchmark was that at least 75% of graduating seniors’ mean ratings (self-ratings and field instructor ratings) would be equal to or above 4.2. The percentage rates are in Table 6 below. Table 6. Senior Field Ratings Percentages Above 4.2 for 2013

Competency Sr. Field

Student Sr. Field Self-Rating % 4.2 and above 4.2 **

Sr. Field FI Rating % 4.2 and above 4.2 **

Status of Competency

C2.1.1 Identify as a professional social worker and conduct oneself accordingly.

89% 87% Met

C2.1.2 Apply social work ethical principles to guide professional practice.

87% 89% Met

C2.1.3 Apply critical thinking to inform and communicate professional judgments.

87% 85% Met

C2.1.4 Engage diversity and difference in practice.

89% 89% Met

Page 11: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

11

11

C2.1.5 Advance human rights and social and economic justice.

78% 83% Met

C2.1.6 Engage in research-informed practice and practice-informed research.

53% 51% Unmet

C2.1.7 Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment.

83% 80% Met

C2.1.8 Engage in policy practice to advance social and economic well-being and to deliver effective social work.

72% 80% Partially Met

C2.1.9 Respond to contexts that shape practice.

69% 74% Unmet

C1.1.10A Engage with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

93% 94% Met

C1.1.10B. Assess client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

85% 87% Met

C1.1.10C Provide prevention/intervention for client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

80% 87% Met

C1.1.10D Evaluate practice with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

80% 83% Met

C1.1.10E End with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

72% 78% Partially Met

**Benchmark=75% 4.2 or above In the year-end field ratings, students met the benchmark for ten of the fourteen competencies, partially met two, and did not meet two: Partially met competencies, meaning that these competencies were rated 4.2 or above by either the FI or the student but not by both: :

• C2.1.8 Engage in policy practice to advance social and economic well-being and to deliver effective social work.

• C1.1.10E End with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

Unmet competencies:

• C2.1.6 Engage in research-informed practice and practice-informed research. • C2.1.9 Respond to contexts that shape practice.

Page 12: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

12

12

Table 7 Senior Field Ratings Over Time. Competency SR

ST 2011

SR ST 2012

Senior ST 2013

SR FI 2011

SR FI 2012

Senior FI 2013

C2.1.1 Identify as a professional social worker and conduct oneself accordingly.

92% 95% 89% 87% 93% 87%

C2.1.2 Apply social work ethical principles to guide professional practice.

84% 92% 87% 84% 97% 89%

C2.1.3 Apply critical thinking to inform and communicate professional judgments.

90% 93% 87% 86% 95% 85%

C2.1.4 Engage diversity and difference in practice.

84% 89% 89% 82% 93% 89%

C2.1.5 Advance human rights and social and economic justice.

82% 85% 78% 76% 93% 83%

C2.1.6 Engage in research-informed practice and practice-informed research.

55% 61% 53% 47% 59% 51%

C2.1.7 Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment.

84% 85% 83% 76% 89% 80%

C2.1.8 Engage in policy practice to advance social and economic well-being and to deliver effective social work.

71% 82% 72% 78% 87% 80%

C2.1.9 Respond to contexts that shape practice.

59% 66% 69% 57% 70% 74%

C1.1.10A Engage with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

98% 93% 93% 94% 97% 94%

C1.1.10B. Assess client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

90% 90% 85% 86% 95% 87%

Page 13: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

13

13

C1.1.10C Provide prevention/intervention for client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

86% 84% 80% 82% 90% 87%

C1.1.10D Evaluate practice with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

76% 85% 80% 73% 89% 83%

C1.1.10E End with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

59% 79% 72% 67% 89% 78%

As we compare student field ratings over time, we find that students in 2012 performed slightly better than the previous class (the first using our revised outcome measures) on most measures. As we move forward in future assessments, we will be tracking trends and monitoring how students do on collective evaluations from year to year. Course Objective Assessment Tool (COAT)

In addition to field assessments, the BSW program uses an instrument based on course objectives (which were, in turn, based on the 14 competencies comprised of 52 practice behaviors) to assess student outcomes. The practice behaviors are compiled and averaged to provide an overall field and COAT rating for each competency. This measure is given at the beginning of the year to incoming students and at the end of the year to graduating seniors. One of our benchmarks is that the mean competency rating for exiting students is significantly higher than the mean competency rating for entering students. This benchmark was met for all competencies. The mean self-ratings of competencies on the COAT were statistically significantly higher on exit than on entry for every competency. Table 8 below summarizes the results.

Page 14: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

14

14

Table 8. Comparison of Pretest and Posttest COAT Means for 2012-2013 Competency Pretest

Mean (SD) * N=80

Posttest Mean (SD)* N=46

% 4.2 and above

C2.1.1 Identify as a professional social worker and conduct oneself accordingly. 1.98  (0.66) 4.74  (0.62)

95.7

C2.1.2 Apply social work ethical principles to guide professional practice. 1.87  (0.71) 4.78  (0.36)

89.1

C2.1.3 Apply critical thinking to inform and communicate professional judgments. 1.86  (0.67) 4.80  (0.28)

93.5

C2.1.4 Engage diversity and difference in practice. 2.35  (0.88) 4.84  (0.27)

97.8

C2.1.5 Advance human rights and social and economic justice. 1.93  (0.78) 4.70  (0.40)

87.0

C2.1.6 Engage in research-informed practice and practice-informed research. 1.43  (0.66) 4.31  (0.75)

63.0

C2.1.7 Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment. 1.56  (0.67) 4.79  (0.33)

89.1

C2.1.8 Engage in policy practice to advance social and economic well-being and to deliver effective social work. 1.55  (0.67) 4.47  (0.65)

65.2

C2.1.9 Respond to contexts that shape practice. 1.71  (0.61) 4.49  (0.65)

63.0

C1.1.10A Engage with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities). 1.60  (0.73) 4.77  (0.35)

87.0

C1.1.10B. Assess client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities). 1.33  (0.60) 4.60  (0.49)

80.4

C1.1.10C Provide prevention/intervention for client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities). 1.30  (0.47) 4.54  (0.64)

73.9

C1.1.10D Evaluate practice with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities). 1.27  (0.57) 4.50  (0.65)

65.2

C1.1.10E End with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities). 1.18  (0.40) 4.55  (0.58)

78.3

• All differences are statistically significant (p<0.001).

Page 15: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

15

15

Figure 1. Pre and Posttest COAT Ratings 2012-2013

The second benchmark that the BSW program set was that at least 75% of students would rate their competence at 4.2 on an competencies, which are developed by averaging the of the practice behaviors for each competency, as measured by the COAT survey. The results are identified in the final column of Table 8 above. COAT Ratings on Benchmarks Table 9 represents the COAT ratings since we implemented our revised outcome measures in 2011 Table 9 Senior Rating on COAT Over Time Competency 2011 COAT

Rating % above 4.2

2012 COAT Rating % above 4.2

2013 COAT Rating % above 4.2

2014 COAT Rating % above 4.2

C2.1.1 Identify as a professional social worker and conduct oneself accordingly.

88 85 95.7

C2.1.2 Apply social work ethical principles to guide professional practice.

80 80 89.1

C2.1.3 Apply critical thinking to inform and communicate professional judgments.

80 88 93.5

C2.1.4 Engage diversity and difference in practice.

93 93 97.8

C2.1.5 Advance human rights and social and economic justice.

85 85 87.0

C2.1.6 Engage in research-informed practice and practice-informed research.

56 56 63.0

C2.1.7 Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment.

83 86 89.1

C2.1.8 Engage in policy practice to advance social and economic well-being

73 73 65.2

COAT  Pre-­‐  and  Posttests  

pre   post  

Page 16: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

16

16

and to deliver effective social work. C2.1.9 Respond to contexts that shape practice.

73 66 63.0

C1.1.10A Engage with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

90 86 87.0

C1.1.10B. Assess client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

81 81 80.4

C1.1.10C Provide prevention/intervention for client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

80 81 73.9

C1.1.10D Evaluate practice with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

73 73 65.2

C1.1.10E End with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

83 83 78.3

Benchmark is that at least 75% of our students will exceed 4.2 on ratings of competencies. Summary of Field and COAT Ratings for 2012-13 Seniors Table 10 lists the ratings on the three outcome measures for senior students for the 2011-2012 academic year. It is our goal that students will rate above 4.2 on all of the measures. Those competencies identified as “met” indicate that students either self-rated or were rated by FI as above the benchmark for all three measures. “Partially met” benchmarks indicate that student ratings were above the benchmark on at least one measure; “not met” benchmarks were below the benchmark on all of the measures. Table 10. Field and COAT Senior Student Ratings for 2012-13

Competency Sr.

Field Student Sr. Field Self-Rating % above 4.2 **

Sr. Field FI Sr. Sr. Field FI Rating % above 4.2 **

COAT Rating % above 4.2

Competency Status

C2.1.1 Identify as a professional social worker and conduct oneself accordingly.

89% 87% 95.7 Met

C2.1.2 Apply social work ethical principles to guide professional practice.

87% 89% 89.1 Met

C2.1.3 Apply critical thinking to 87% 85% 93.5 Met

Page 17: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

17

17

inform and communicate professional judgments. C2.1.4 Engage diversity and difference in practice.

89% 89% 97.8 Met

C2.1.5 Advance human rights and social and economic justice.

78% 83% 87.0 Met

C2.1.6 Engage in research-informed practice and practice-informed research.

53% 51% 63.0 Unmet

C2.1.7 Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment.

83% 80% 89.1 Met

C2.1.8 Engage in policy practice to advance social and economic well-being and to deliver effective social work.

72% 80% 65.2 Partially Met

C2.1.9 Respond to contexts that shape practice.

69% 74% 63.0 Unmet

C1.1.10A Engage with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

93% 94% 87.0 Met

C1.1.10B. Assess client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

85% 87% 80.4

Met

C1.1.10C Provide prevention/intervention for client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

80% 87% 73.9 Partially Met

C1.1.10D Evaluate practice with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

80% 83% 65.2 Partially Met

C1.1.10E End with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

72% 78% 78.3 Partially Met

**Benchmark=75% 4.2 or above Senior Students met the following benchmarks: C2.1.1 Identify as a professional social worker and conduct oneself accordingly. C2.1.2 Apply social work ethical principles to guide professional practice. C2.1.3 Apply critical thinking to inform and communicate professional judgments C2.1.4 Engage diversity and difference in practice. C2.1.5 Advance human rights and social and economic justice. C2.1.7 Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment. C1.1.10A Engage with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities). C1.1.10B. Assess client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities). The following benchmarks were partially met this year:

Page 18: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

18

18

C2.1.8 Engage in policy practice to advance social and economic well-being and to deliver effective social work. C1.1.10C Provide prevention/intervention for client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities). C1.1.10D Evaluate practice with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities). C1.1.10E End with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities). The following benchmarks were not met this year: C2.1.6 Engage in research-informed practice and practice-informed research. C2.1.9 Respond to contexts that shape practice. The competencies that were not met and those that were partially met will be discussed in BSW Program Committee and in the various curriculum committees over the course of the 2013-14 academic year to determine ways to address student deficits in the areas of unmet and partially met competencies. We look more carefully at unmet competencies, and consider which specific practice behaviors are low, so that we can address these areas in both field and classroom curriculum. Appendices D and E indicate the mean ratings on the practice behaviors on the field and COAT measures.

Page 19: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

19

19

Implicit Curriculum In addition to evaluating our curriculum, the School of Social Work monitors student experiences through an annual climate survey (see Appendix F). Graduating seniors are surveyed to learn about their experiences in the School of Social Work. This climate survey includes questions examining the environment within which the BSW Program’s teaching and learning occurs. The tool focuses on whether students feel that they and others have been treated with respect, the extent to which differences and diversity have been supported, advising, and the extent to which they feel they have access to faculty and administration to voice concerns. It also asks the extent to which they have participated in extra-curricular activities and used campus resources.

We asked students to identify the extent to which they agreed with the following questions regarding the SCU/UST Social Work (SCU/UST SSW). Response categories ranged from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5).

Table 11. Diversity, Social Justice and Respect

Question 2011 % that disagree or strongly agree

2012 % that disagree or strongly agree

2013 % that disagree or strongly agree

I feel pressure to fit in at the SCU/UST SSW

48.7 66.7 54.2

The SCU/UST School of Social Work encourages discussions about issues of difference.

66.7 93.3 89.6

I feel free to speak up about diversity issues that are important to me in my classes at SCU/UST SSW.

61.5 83.4 77.1

The SCU/UST SSW demonstrates commitment to social justice.

84.6 94.9 97.9

Page 20: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

20

20

We asked students their experiences in the classroom addressing diversity by providing a number of different diversity issues and asked students if they had discussed diversity in their classes the SCU/UST School of Social Work. Table 12. Addressing Diversity 2011%agree or

strongly agree 2012 %agree or strongly agree

2013 %agree or strongly agree

1. Sexuality 87.1 83.1 83.3 2. Race and Ethnicity 94.9 91.5 87.9 3. Religion and Spirituality 69.3 78.0 84.5 4. Ability and Disability 71.8 88.1 93.7 5. Social Class 89.8 96.6 89.6 6. Age Issues 76.9 86.4 87.6 We polled students regarding their opinions that the SCU/UST School of Social Work (SCU/UST SSW) demonstrates a meaningful commitment to diversity. Table 13. Demonstrating a Meaningful Commitment to Diversity 2011

% that agree or strongly agree

2012 % that agree or strongly agree

2013 % that agree or strongly agree

1. Curriculum 76.9 88.2 89.1 2. Field Education 82.0 93.2 91.3 3. Faculty 61.5 76.3 84.8 4. Administration and Staff Recruitment

51.3 74.2 74.0

5. Student Recruitment and Admission

48.8 71.2 76.1

Student opinions regarding The SCU/UST School of Social Work’s commitment to diversity can be seen in their responses to questions regarding the diversity of a number of groups. Table 14. Commitment to Diversity 2011

% that agree or strongly agree

2012 % that agree or strongly agree

2013 % that agree or strongly agree

4. Administration and Staff Recruitment

51.3 74.2 75.8

5. Student Recruitment and Admission

48.8 71.2 71.1

Students were asked if they believed that they had been treated with respect in the SCU/UST School of Social Work.

Page 21: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

21

21

Table 15. Respect 2011

% that agree or strongly agree

2012 % that agree or strongly agree

2013 % that agree or strongly agree

1. By faculty 92.3 94.9 91.5 2. By administration and staff

89.7 94.9 89.4

3. By my fellow students at the School

89.8 89.8 93.5

In an attempt to learn if students experience harassment in the School of Social Work, a new question was added to the survey in 2013. When asked, 12.5 % of students indicated that they had experienced discrimination and/or harassment within the School of Social Work; 14.6 were not sure. The remaining 72.9% said that they had not. If students answered “yes,” they were asked if the School of Social Work made an appropriate response. Table 16. Response to Harassment 2013

%agree or strongly agree (n=6)

The School of Social Work responded effectively to fix harassment and/or discrimination that I experienced

0%

Of the 6 students who felt that they had been harassed or discriminated, none felt that the situation had been rectified. Half responded with a neutral “neither agree nor disagree” and the rest disagreed or strongly disagreed.

Students were asked to rate their satisfaction with the admission process.

Table 17. Satisfaction with Admission Process 2011

% that are satisfied or very satisfied

2012 % that are satisfied or very satisfied

2013 % that are satisfied or very satisfied

4. Admission to Major Process

69.2 84.8 72.3

Page 22: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

22

22

Academic Advising

In an attempt to learn how students negotiate difficulties with the program, students were asked whom they would feel comfortable approaching with a concern about the program at the SCU/UST School of Social Work. Table 18. Whom Students would Approach 2011

% that agree or strongly agree

2012 % that agree or strongly agree

2013 % that agree or strongly agree

1. Classroom faculty 74.4 91.5 80.9 2. My advisor 82.0 88.1 70.2 3. BSW Program Director 46.1 68.5 56.3 4. Dean 25.6 49.1 48.9

Advising was assessed by asking students about their satisfaction with faculty advising. Table 19. Advising 2011

% that agree or strongly agree

2012 % that agree or strongly agree

2013 % that agree or strongly agree

2. Faculty Advising 79.5 76.1 72.3

Student Participation

We asked students to rate the extent to which they were satisfied opportunities to participate in various activities. Table 20. Student Opportunities 2011

% that are satisfied or very satisfied

2012 % that are satisfied or very satisfied

2013 % that are satisfied or very satisfied

3. Opportunities for Student Research

28.2 47.4 63.8

4. Admission to Major Process

69.2 84.8 72.3

5. Social Work Club 38.4 37.3 43.5 6. Beta Epsilon Student Honor Society

28.2 61.0 46.8

We also wanted to identify what activities students had actually taken part in while they were students at the School of Social Work.

Page 23: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

23

23

Table 21. Participation 2011 2012 2013 1. Social Work Club 41% 33.9% 28.9% 2. Day at the Capitol 84.6% 88.1% 93.5% 3. Service Projects 74.4% 35.6% 58.7% 4. Salons 46.2% 6.8% 0% 5. Justice Lecture 79.5% 66.1% 33.%3 6. Room at the Table 26.5% 42.4% 20.0% 7. Institutes (Group work, Supervision, Spirituality)

59% 52.5% 55.6&

8. Licensure Preparation 30.8% 37.3% 63.0% 9. Beta Epsilon Honor Society

38.5% 40.7% 55.6%

And we wondered if students perceived The SCU/UST School of Social Work to encourage them to participate in the above activities. Table 22. Encouragement of Activities 2011

%that agree or strongly agree

2012 %that agree or strongly agree

2013 %that agree or strongly agree

71.8% 72.9 78.3

Resources

In an effort to determine what resources students found useful, we survey them as to which resources they had used. Table 23. Support Systems Used by Students 2011 2012 2013 Writing Assistance

35.9% 45.8% 21.7%

Accommodation for a Disability

7.7% 6.8% 13.3%

Tutoring

15.4% 15.3% 4.4%

Financial Aid

79.5% 86.4% 76.6%

Scholarships

79.5% 71.2% 68.1%

Faculty Recommendations or References

66.7% 67.8% 68.9%

Informal consultation with faculty

84.6% 81.4% 78.3%

Parenting Supports (e.g. day care)

5.1% 8.5% 4.5%

University counseling services

38.6%

Page 24: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

24

24

University Academic Advising (UST)

45.7%

O’Neill Learning Center (SCU)

26.2%

Other (please identify)

5.1% 8.5% 4.0%

Under “other,” Students wrote in “disability services and “job.” Questions on the climate survey regarding the use of support services were included to identify services most needed and used by our students, not to assess the quality of services. These questions help us to know where to direct students who express need and allow us to build collaborations with support staff in these areas so we can better advocate for our students Overall we found that students were generally happy with the climate at the school of social work. They identified a general satisfaction with commitment to diversity and respect, indicating that they feel valued by faculty, students, and staff.

Page 25: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

25

25

Appendix A

JUNIOR  BSW  FIELDWORK  EVALUATION  

 This  evaluation  covers  the  St.  Catherine  University/University  of  St.  Thomas  School  of  Social  Work  Junior  Field  Placement  experience.  This  document  allows  both  the  student  and  the  fieldwork  instructor  to  assess,  monitor  and  give  feedback  on  the  growth  of  a  student’s  knowledge,  values  and  skills  to  be  applied  to  generalist  social  work  practice.    Purpose  of  Social  Work  Fieldwork  Placements  and  Evaluation:  The  goals  of  each  fieldwork  experience  differ  slightly  based  on  the  outline  of  the  Social  Work  program.  The  program  employs  a  model  of  growth  –  the  senior   field  experience  builds  on  the  junior  experience.  As  the  goals  of  each  year  are  different,  please  take  into  aCount   the   following   when   completing   the   evaluations.   When   assessing   a   student’s  competence  please  consider  this  through  the  lens  of  their  junior  or  senior  context.  (For  this  reason,  we  have  given  a  range  specific  to  each  year  –  see  assessment  scale.)    JUNIOR  FIELDWORK:  The  purpose  of  Junior  Field  is  to  introduce  the  students  to  the  issues  and  practice  of  professional  social  work,  complementing  the  student’s  academic  work  and  allowing  the  student  to  explore  his  or  her  “goodness  of  fit”  with  the  social  work  major.  Students  begin  learning  about  social  work  knowledge,  values,  and  skills  and  how  to  integrate  them  in  practice  through  observation  and  beginning  tasks.      INSTRUCTIONS  FOR  COMPLETING  FINAL  EVALUATION    Students:    -­‐ Complete  the  cover  page  aligning  with  your  field  experience  (i.e.  Junior/Senior  Field  

Placement  Information)  -­‐ Complete  your  self-­‐assessment  of  all  Core  Competencies  and  Practice  Behaviors  -­‐ Email  your  Final  Evaluation  to  your  Field  Supervisor  for  their  completion  Field  Supervisor(s):  -­‐ Find   the   mid-­‐term   evaluation   to   reference   specific   tasks   student   completed   to  

demonstrate  practice  behaviors  -­‐ Complete  the  Final  Evaluation  of  your  student    -­‐ Review  ratings  and  comments  with  your  student    Students:    -­‐ Sign  off  on  agreement/disagreement  and  add  any  additional  comments  needed  -­‐ Collect  all  necessary  signatures    -­‐ Make  a  copy  for  yourself  and  for  your  Field  Supervisor  -­‐ Submit  to  your  Field  Faculty    

Page 26: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

26

26

     

JUNIOR  –  PLACEMENT  INFORMATION:    Name  of  Student:  __________________________________  Phone:              Junior  Placement  Agency:                      

Dates  of  Placement:          to          

Fieldwork  Instructor:             Phone:          

Fieldwork  Faculty  Liaison:              

Briefly  describe  the  assignments  and  learning  experiences:  

                                                 

Page 27: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

27

27

Instructions  for  Rating  Students  on  the  10  Competencies  in  the  First  Part  of  the  Evaluation:       The  standard  by  which  a  student  is  to  be  compared  is  that  of  a  new  beginning-­‐level  social  worker.    The  10  competencies  that  are  specified  in  this  evaluation  form  are  those  established  by  our  national  accrediting  organization  (the  Council  on  Social  Work  Education).    Under  each  competency  statement  there  are  several  items  that  we  ask  that  you  rate  according  to  the  following  criteria.    

SENIORS

 

  5   The  student  is  fully  competent  in  this  area  for  beginning  generalist  social  work  practice.    

4   The  student  is  demonstrating  beginning  competency  in  this  area.  

JUNIORS

 

3   The  student  is  gaining  experience  and  meeting  expectations  in  this  area.  2   The  student  has  not  as  yet  met  the  expectations  in  this  area,  but  there  

is  evidence  that  the  student  will  meet  the  expectations  in  the  near  future  

1   The  student  has  not  met  the  expectations  in  this  area,  and  there  is  not  much  evidence  that  the  student  will  meet  the  expectations  in  this  area  in  the  near  future  

n/a   Not  applicable,  as  the  student  has  not  had  the  opportunity  to  demonstrate  competence  in  this  area  

 Competency  marks  a  threshold  across  which  the  student  passes  commencing  a  

journey  of  career  long  learning.  The  notion  of  competence  here  is  that  the  student  has  mastered  the  knowledge,  values  and  skills–  i.e.  practice  behaviors  which  are  necessary  to  commence  entry  level  generalist  practice.  This  represents  his  or  her  beginning  of  a  professional  rite  of  passage  toward  the  eventual  achievement  of  that  sought  after  status  of  “expert.  “  As  it  is  utilized  here,  “competence”  is  a  threshold  concept.  That  is,  in  demonstrating  competence,  one  crosses  the  threshold  separating  the  novice  from  the  competent  beginning  practitioner.    Competence,  however,  does  not  in  any  way  connote  “expert”  (Holloway,  Black,  Hoffman  &  Pierce,  2009).  

Comments  may  be  made  under  any  competency  statement,  if  desired.    Please  be  sure  to  indicate  those  areas  in  which  you  think  the  student  is  particularly  strong  and  those  areas  that  need  improvement.     This  evaluation  is  intended  to  give  the  student  feedback  about  her  or  his  performance.    The  agency  supervisor’s  rating  of  these  items  will  not  directly  be  used  to  calculate  the  grade  that  is  given  to  the  student.    The  faculty  supervisor  has  the  responsibility  of  assigning  the  grade  for  the  course.    Please  note  that  student’s  will  also  self-­‐assess  as  part  of  this  evaluation  process.  This  gives  the  student  the  opportunity  to  reflect  on  her/his  own  learning  as  well  as  provides  the  student,  the  supervisor  and  faculty  the  opportunity  to  address  any  questions  or  differences  in  rating  or  understanding.  Please  note:  though  the  student’s  rating  is  considered,  the  supervisor’s  rating  is  more  heavily  weighted.  

Page 28: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

28

28

         Competency  2.1.1:  Identify  as  a  professional  social  worker  and  conduct  oneself  accordingly.  

PRACTICE  BEHAVIORS  

JR    Student  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐3)  

JR  FWI  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐3)  

 1.   Advocate  for  client  access  to  the  services  of  social  work  at  the  micro,  mezzo,  and  macro  levels.  

   

 2.     Practice  personal  reflection  and  self-­‐correction  to  assure  continual  professional  development.  

   

 3.   Attend  to  professional  roles  and  boundaries.    

   

 4.   Demonstrate   professional   demeanor   in   behavior,  appearance,  and  communication.  

   

 5.     Engage  in  life-­‐long  professional  learning.        6.   Use  supervision  and  consultation.        Competency  2.1.2:  Apply  social  work  ethical  principles  to  guide  professional  practice.  

PRACTICE  BEHAVIORS  

JR    Student  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐3)  

JR  FWI  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐3)  

 1.   Continuously  recognize  and  manage  personal  values  in  a  way  that  allows  professional  values  to  guide  practice.  

   

 2.   Make   ethical   decisions   by   applying   standards   of   the  National   Association   of   Social   Workers   Code   of   Ethics  (NASW,   2008),   the   International   Federation   of   Social  Workers/International   Association   of   Schools   of   Social  Work   Ethics   in   Social   Work,   Statement   of   Principles  (IFSW   2004),   and   the  Minnesota   Board   of   Social  Work  and  as  appropriate  other  codes  of  ethics.  

   

 3.   Tolerate  ambiguity  in  resolving  ethical  conflicts.    

   

 4.   Apply   strategies   of   ethical   reasoning   to   arrive   at  principled  decisions.  

   

Page 29: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

29

29

 Competency  2.1.3:    Apply  critical  thinking  to  inform  and  communicate  professional  judgments.    

PRACTICE  BEHAVIORS  

JR    Student  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐3)  

JR  FWI  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐3)  

 1.   Distinguish,  appraise,  and   integrate  multiple  sources  of  knowledge,   including   research-­‐based   knowledge,  community   and   cultural   resources,   and   practice  wisdom.  

   

 2.   Analyze   models   of   assessment,   prevention,  intervention,  and  evaluation.  

   

 3.   Demonstrate   effective   oral   communication   in   working  with   individuals,   families,   groups,   organizations,  communities,  and  colleagues.  

   

 4.   Demonstrate   effective   written   communication   in  working   with   individuals,   families,   groups,  organizations,  communities,  and  colleagues.  

   

 5.   Utilize   skills   and   processes   of   critical   thinking   to   guide  communication  and  decision  making.  

   

   

   Competency  2.1.4:  Engage  diversity  and  difference  in  practice.  

 

PRACTICE  BEHAVIORS  

JR    Student  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐3)  

JR  FWI  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐3)  

 1.   Engage  in  cultural  self-­‐study.      

   

 2.   Recognize  the  extent  to  which  a  culture’s  structures  and  values  may  oppress,  marginalize,  alienate,  or  create  or  enhance  privilege  and  power.  

   

 3.   Engage   in   continuous   self-­‐assessment   of   one’s   social  location  within  social  power  structures  to  minimize  the  influence  of  personal  biases  and  values  in  working  with  diverse  groups.  

   

 4.   Recognize  and  communicate  their  understanding  of  the      

Page 30: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

30

30

importance  of  difference  in  shaping  life  experiences.    5.   View   themselves   as   learners   and   engage   those   with  

whom  they  work  as  informants.      

 6.       Recognize  and  appreciate  strengths  across  cultures.    

   

    Competency  2.1.5:  Advance  human  rights  and  social  and  economic  justice.  

PRACTICE  BEHAVIORS  

JR    Student  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐3)  

JR  FWI  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐3)  

 1.   Understand  the  forms  and  mechanisms  of  oppression  and  discrimination  and  the  changing  nature  of  those  systems.  

   

 2.       Advocate  for  human  rights  and  social  and  economic  justice.    

   

 3.   Engage  in  practices  that  advance  social  and  economic  justice.  

   

 4.     Engage  in  advancing  social  and  economic  justice  by  applying  Social  Work  for  Social  Justice  Principles,  the  United  Nations  Declaration  of  Human  Rights,  and  other  perspectives  on  social  justice.  

   

 Competency  2.1.6:  Engage  in  research-­‐informed  practice  and  practice-­‐informed  research.  

PRACTICE  BEHAVIORS  

JR    Student  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐3)  

JR  FWI  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐3)  

 1.   Use  practice  experience  to  inform  scientific  inquiry.        2.       Use  research  evidence  to  inform  practice.          Competency  2.1.7:  Apply  knowledge  of  human  behavior  and  the  social  environment.  

PRACTICE  BEHAVIORS  

JR    Student  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐3)  

JR  FWI  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐3)  

Page 31: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

31

31

 1.   Utilize  conceptual  frameworks  to  guide  the  processes  of  engagement,   assessment,   prevention/intervention,  evaluation,  and  endings.  

   

 2.   Critically   analyze   and   apply   knowledge   to   understand  person  and  environment.  

   

 3.   Apply   the   multidimensional   concepts   of  bio/psycho/social/spiritual/cultural  perspective   to  social  work  practice  on  the  micro,  mezzo,  and  macro  levels.  

   

Competency  2.1.8:  Engage  in  policy  practice  to  advance  social  and  economic  well-­‐being  and  to  deliver  effective  social  work  services.  

PRACTICE  BEHAVIORS  

JR    Student  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐3)  

JR  FWI  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐3)  

 1.   Understand  the  impact  that  social  and  organizational  policy  and  agency  delivery  systems  has  on  individuals,  groups,  families,  organizations,  and  communities.  

   

 2.   Analyze,  formulate,  and  advocate  for  policies  that  advance  individual  wellbeing  and  a  just  society.  

   

 3.   Collaborate  with  colleagues  and  individuals,  groups,  families,  organizations,  and  communities  for  effective  policy  action.  

   

 Competency  2.1.9:  Respond  to  contexts  that  shape  practice.    

PRACTICE  BEHAVIORS  

JR    Student  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐3)  

JR  FWI  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐3)  

 1.   Continuously  discover,  appraise,  and  attend  to  changing  locales,   populations,   scientific   and   technological  developments,  and  emerging  societal  trends  to  provide  relevant  services.  

   

 2.   Provide  leadership  in  promoting  sustainable  changes  in  service  delivery  and  practice  to  improve  the  quality  of  social  services.  

   

     

Page 32: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

32

32

   Competency  2.1.10(a-­‐e):  Engage,  assess,  intervene,  evaluate,  and  end  with  client  systems  of  all  sizes  (individuals,  families,  groups,  organizations,  and  communities).  

PRACTICE  BEHAVIORS  

JR    Student  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐3)  

JR  FWI  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐3)  

ENGAGE    1.   Mindfully  prepare  for  action  with  individuals,  families,  

groups,  organizations,  and  communities.      

 2.   Establish  rapport  and  build  effective  relationships.      

 3.   Use  empathy  and  other  interpersonal  skills.      

 4.   Use  the  collaborative  relationship  to  develop  a  mutually  agreed-­‐on  focus  of  work  and  desired  outcomes.  

   

ASSESS    1.   Collect,  organize,  and  interpret  client  system  data.      

 2.   Assess  client  system  strengths  and  challenges.      

 3.   Develop  mutually  agreed-­‐on  intervention  goals  and  objectives.  

   

 4.   Select  appropriate  prevention/intervention  strategies.      

INTERVENE    1.   Help  client  systems  address  problems  and  foster  

resiliency.      

 2.   Negotiate,  mediate,  and  advocate  with  client  systems.      

 3.   Initiate  actions  to  implement  prevention/intervention  strategies  to  enhance  client  system  capacities.  

   

 4.   Initiate  actions  consistent  with  organizational  goals.      EVALUATE    1.   Critically  analyze,  and  evaluate  interventions.      

 2.   Continuously  monitor  progress  toward  goals  and  respond  accordingly.  

   

Page 33: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

33

33

 3.   Evaluate  outcomes  through  use  of  multiple  sources  and  types  of  data  

   

END    1.   Facilitate  transitions  and  endings.  

     

 2.   Plan  for,  integrate,  and  promote  sustainable  and  transferable  client  system  change.  

   

      Student  Comments:         FWI  Comments:        

 JUNIOR  -­‐  FINAL  OVERALL  EVALUATION:  

 Please  check  one  of  the  following  at  the  final  evaluation.        

This   student   has   excelled   in   junior   field   placement   by   performing   above  expectations  for  students.  This  student  is  ready  for  a  senior  field  placement.  

  This  student  has  met  the  expectations  of  the  junior  field  placement.    This  student  

is  ready  for  a  senior  field  placement.    

This  student  is  not  yet  ready  for  a  senior  field  placement.    

This  student  is  not  yet  ready  for  a  senior  field  placement,  and  has  demonstrated  serious  problems  in  performance,  and  perhaps  should  be  encouraged  to  pursue  another  major.  

 If  you  have  not  previously  done  so  in  the  comment  sections,  please  identify  2  areas  of  student  strengths  and  2  areas  for  improvement:    STRENGTHS:  1.      2.      AREAS  FOR  IMPROVEMENT:  

Page 34: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

34

34

1.      2.    

*The  following  section  should  be  completed  by  the  student:    My  agency  supervisor  has  discussed  this  evaluation  with  me,  and  I  have  received  a  copy.    My  agreement  or  disagreement  follows:    

  I  agree  with  the  evaluation       Comments:    

  I  do  not  agree  with  evaluation       Comments:    

                             Signature  of  Fieldwork  Instructor:    ________________________________Date:            Student’s  Signature:                   Date:                Field  Faculty  Liaison  Signature:               Date:              

Page 35: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

35

35

Appendix B

SENIOR  BSW  FIELDWORK  EVALUATION  

 This  evaluation  covers  the  St.  Catherine  University/University  of  St.  Thomas  School  of  Social  Work  Junior  Field  Placement  experience.  This  document  allows  both  the  student  and  the  fieldwork  instructor  to  assess,  monitor  and  give  feedback  on  the  growth  of  a  student’s  knowledge,  values  and  skills  to  be  applied  to  generalist  social  work  practice.    Purpose  of  Social  Work  Fieldwork  Placements  and  Evaluation:  The  goals  of  each  fieldwork  experience  differ  slightly  based  on  the  outline  of  the  Social  Work  program.  The  program  employs  a  model  of  growth  –  the  senior   field  experience  builds  on  the  junior  experience.  As  the  goals  of  each  year  are  different,  please  take  into  account   the   following   when   completing   the   evaluations.   When   assessing   a   student’s  competence  please  consider  this  through  the  lens  of  their  junior  or  senior  context.  (For  this  reason,  we  have  given  a  range  specific  to  each  year  –  see  assessment  scale.)    SENIOR  FIELDWORK:  The  purpose  of  Senior  Field  is  to  provide  the  student  with  the  opportunity  to  further  integrate  and  apply  knowledge  and  theory  from  academic  courses  to  actual  social  work  situations.  The  student  is  expected  to  learn  to  perform  social  work  responsibilities  equivalent  to  those  of  a  new  staff  member  in  the  agency,  under  close  supervision  of  their  supervisor.  INSTRUCTIONS  FOR  COMPLETING  FINAL  EVALUATION    Students:    -­‐ Complete  the  cover  page  aligning  with  your  field  experience  (i.e.  Junior/Senior  Field  

Placement  Information)  -­‐ Complete  your  self-­‐assessment  of  all  Core  Competencies  and  Practice  Behaviors  -­‐ Email  your  Final  Evaluation  to  your  Field  Supervisor  for  their  completion  Field  Supervisor(s):  -­‐ Find   the   mid-­‐term   evaluation   to   reference   specific   tasks   student   completed   to  

demonstrate  practice  behaviors  -­‐ Complete  the  Final  Evaluation  of  your  student    -­‐ Review  ratings  and  comments  with  your  student    Students:    -­‐ Sign  off  on  agreement/disagreement  and  add  any  additional  comments  needed  -­‐ Collect  all  necessary  signatures    -­‐ Make  a  copy  for  yourself  and  for  your  Field  Supervisor  -­‐ Submit  to  your  Field  Faculty    

Page 36: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

36

36

 SENIOR  –  PLACEMENT  INFORMATION:  

 Name  of  Student:  __________________________________  Phone:              Senior  Placement  Agency:                      

Dates  of  Placement:          to          

Fieldwork  Instructor:             Phone:          

Fieldwork  Faculty  Liaison:              

Briefly  describe  the  assignments  and  learning  experiences:  

                                                       

Page 37: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

37

37

 Instructions  for  Rating  Students  on  the  10  Competencies  in  the  First  Part  of  the  Evaluation:       The  standard  by  which  a  student  is  to  be  compared  is  that  of  a  new  beginning-­‐level  social  worker.    The  10  competencies  that  are  specified  in  this  evaluation  form  are  those  established  by  our  national  accrediting  organization  (the  Council  on  Social  Work  Education).    Under  each  competency  statement  there  are  several  items  that  we  ask  that  you  rate  according  to  the  following  criteria.    

SENIORS

 

  5   The  student  is  fully  competent  in  this  area  for  beginning  generalist  social  work  practice.    

4   The  student  is  demonstrating  beginning  competency  in  this  area.  

JUNIORS

 

3   The  student  is  gaining  experience  and  meeting  expectations  in  this  area.  2   The  student  has  not  as  yet  met  the  expectations  in  this  area,  but  there  

is  evidence  that  the  student  will  meet  the  expectations  in  the  near  future  

1   The  student  has  not  met  the  expectations  in  this  area,  and  there  is  not  much  evidence  that  the  student  will  meet  the  expectations  in  this  area  in  the  near  future  

n/a   Not  applicable,  as  the  student  has  not  had  the  opportunity  to  demonstrate  competence  in  this  area  

 Competency  marks  a  threshold  across  which  the  student  passes  commencing  a  

journey  of  career  long  learning.  The  notion  of  competence  here  is  that  the  student  has  mastered  the  knowledge,  values  and  skills–  i.e.  practice  behaviors  which  are  necessary  to  commence  entry  level  generalist  practice.  This  represents  his  or  her  beginning  of  a  professional  rite  of  passage  toward  the  eventual  achievement  of  that  sought  after  status  of  “expert.  “  As  it  is  utilized  here,  “competence”  is  a  threshold  concept.  That  is,  in  demonstrating  competence,  one  crosses  the  threshold  separating  the  novice  from  the  competent  beginning  practitioner.    Competence,  however,  does  not  in  any  way  connote  “expert”  (Holloway,  Black,  Hoffman  &  Pierce,  2009).  

Comments  may  be  made  under  any  competency  statement,  if  desired.    Please  be  sure  to  indicate  those  areas  in  which  you  think  the  student  is  particularly  strong  and  those  areas  that  need  improvement.     This  evaluation  is  intended  to  give  the  student  feedback  about  her  or  his  performance.    The  agency  supervisor’s  rating  of  these  items  will  not  directly  be  used  to  calculate  the  grade  that  is  given  to  the  student.    The  faculty  supervisor  has  the  responsibility  of  assigning  the  grade  for  the  course.    Please  note  that  student’s  will  also  self-­‐assess  as  part  of  this  evaluation  process.  This  gives  the  student  the  opportunity  to  reflect  on  her/his  own  learning  as  well  as  provides  the  student,  the  supervisor  and  faculty  the  opportunity  to  address  any  questions  or  differences  in  rating  or  

Page 38: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

38

38

understanding.  Please  note:  though  the  student’s  rating  is  considered,  the  supervisor’s  rating  is  more  heavily  weighted.            Competency  2.1.1:  Identify  as  a  professional  social  worker  and  conduct  oneself  accordingly.  

PRACTICE  BEHAVIORS  

SR    Student  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐5)  

SR  FWI  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐5)  

 1.   Advocate  for  client  access  to  the  services  of  social  work  at  the  micro,  mezzo,  and  macro  levels.  

   

 2.     Practice  personal  reflection  and  self-­‐correction  to  assure  continual  professional  development.  

   

 3.   Attend  to  professional  roles  and  boundaries.    

   

 4.   Demonstrate   professional   demeanor   in   behavior,  appearance,  and  communication.  

   

 5.     Engage  in  life-­‐long  professional  learning.        6.   Use  supervision  and  consultation.        Competency  2.1.2:  Apply  social  work  ethical  principles  to  guide  professional  practice.  

PRACTICE  BEHAVIORS  

SR    Student  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐5)  

SR  FWI  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐5)  

 1.   Continuously  recognize  and  manage  personal  values  in  a  way  that  allows  professional  values  to  guide  practice.  

   

 2.   Make   ethical   decisions   by   applying   standards   of   the  National   Association   of   Social   Workers   Code   of   Ethics  (NASW,   2008),   the   International   Federation   of   Social  Workers/International   Association   of   Schools   of   Social  Work   Ethics   in   Social   Work,   Statement   of   Principles  (IFSW   2004),   and   the  Minnesota   Board   of   Social  Work  and  as  appropriate  other  codes  of  ethics.  

   

 3.   Tolerate  ambiguity  in  resolving  ethical  conflicts.    

   

Page 39: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

39

39

 4.   Apply   strategies   of   ethical   reasoning   to   arrive   at  principled  decisions.  

   

               Competency  2.1.3:    Apply  critical  thinking  to  inform  and  communicate  professional  judgments.    

PRACTICE  BEHAVIORS  

SR    Student  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐5)  

SR  FWI  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐5)  

 1.   Distinguish,  appraise,  and   integrate  multiple  sources  of  knowledge,   including   research-­‐based   knowledge,  community   and   cultural   resources,   and   practice  wisdom.  

   

 2.   Analyze   models   of   assessment,   prevention,  intervention,  and  evaluation.  

   

 3.   Demonstrate   effective   oral   communication   in   working  with   individuals,   families,   groups,   organizations,  communities,  and  colleagues.  

   

 4.   Demonstrate   effective   written   communication   in  working   with   individuals,   families,   groups,  organizations,  communities,  and  colleagues.  

   

 5.   Utilize   skills   and   processes   of   critical   thinking   to   guide  communication  and  decision  making.  

   

     Competency  2.1.4:  Engage  diversity  and  difference  in  practice.  

 

PRACTICE  BEHAVIORS  

SR    Student  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐5)  

SR  FWI  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐5)  

 1.   Engage  in  cultural  self-­‐study.      

   

Page 40: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

40

40

 2.   Recognize  the  extent  to  which  a  culture’s  structures  and  values  may  oppress,  marginalize,  alienate,  or  create  or  enhance  privilege  and  power.  

   

 3.   Engage   in   continuous   self-­‐assessment   of   one’s   social  location  within  social  power  structures  to  minimize  the  influence  of  personal  biases  and  values  in  working  with  diverse  groups.  

   

 4.   Recognize  and  communicate  their  understanding  of  the  importance  of  difference  in  shaping  life  experiences.  

   

 5.   View   themselves   as   learners   and   engage   those   with  whom  they  work  as  informants.  

   

 6.       Recognize  and  appreciate  strengths  across  cultures.    

   

      Competency  2.1.5:  Advance  human  rights  and  social  and  economic  justice.  

PRACTICE  BEHAVIORS  

SR    Student  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐5)  

SR  FWI  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐5)  

 1.   Understand  the  forms  and  mechanisms  of  oppression  and  discrimination  and  the  changing  nature  of  those  systems.  

   

 2.       Advocate  for  human  rights  and  social  and  economic  justice.    

   

 3.   Engage  in  practices  that  advance  social  and  economic  justice.  

   

 4.     Engage  in  advancing  social  and  economic  justice  by  applying  Social  Work  for  Social  Justice  Principles,  the  United  Nations  Declaration  of  Human  Rights,  and  other  perspectives  on  social  justice.  

   

 Competency  2.1.6:  Engage  in  research-­‐informed  practice  and  practice-­‐informed  research.  

PRACTICE  BEHAVIORS  

SR    Student  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐5)  

SR  FWI  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐5)  

 1.   Use  practice  experience  to  inform  scientific  inquiry.      

Page 41: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

41

41

 2.       Use  research  evidence  to  inform  practice.          Competency  2.1.7:  Apply  knowledge  of  human  behavior  and  the  social  environment.  

PRACTICE  BEHAVIORS  

SR    Student  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐5)  

SR  FWI  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐5)  

 1.   Utilize  conceptual  frameworks  to  guide  the  processes  of  engagement,   assessment,   prevention/intervention,  evaluation,  and  endings.  

   

 2.   Critically   analyze   and   apply   knowledge   to   understand  person  and  environment.  

   

 3.   Apply   the   multidimensional   concepts   of  bio/psycho/social/spiritual/cultural  perspective   to  social  work  practice  on  the  micro,  mezzo,  and  macro  levels.  

   

Competency  2.1.8:  Engage  in  policy  practice  to  advance  social  and  economic  well-­‐being  and  to  deliver  effective  social  work  services.  

PRACTICE  BEHAVIORS  

SR    Student  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐5)  

SR  FWI  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐5)  

 1.   Understand  the  impact  that  social  and  organizational  policy  and  agency  delivery  systems  has  on  individuals,  groups,  families,  organizations,  and  communities.  

   

 2.   Analyze,  formulate,  and  advocate  for  policies  that  advance  individual  wellbeing  and  a  just  society.  

   

 3.   Collaborate  with  colleagues  and  individuals,  groups,  families,  organizations,  and  communities  for  effective  policy  action.  

   

 Competency  2.1.9:  Respond  to  contexts  that  shape  practice.    

PRACTICE  BEHAVIORS  

SR    Student  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐5)  

SR  FWI  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐5)  

 1.   Continuously  discover,  appraise,  and  attend  to  changing      

Page 42: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

42

42

locales,   populations,   scientific   and   technological  developments,  and  emerging  societal  trends  to  provide  relevant  services.  

 2.   Provide  leadership  in  promoting  sustainable  changes  in  service  delivery  and  practice  to  improve  the  quality  of  social  services.  

   

 Competency  2.1.10(a-­‐e):  Engage,  assess,  intervene,  evaluate,  and  end  with  client  systems  of  all  sizes  (individuals,  families,  groups,  organizations,  and  communities).  

PRACTICE  BEHAVIORS  

SR    Student  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐5)  

SR  FWI  Rating  (n/a;  1-­‐5)  

ENGAGE    1.   Mindfully  prepare  for  action  with  individuals,  families,  

groups,  organizations,  and  communities.      

 2.   Establish  rapport  and  build  effective  relationships.      

 3.   Use  empathy  and  other  interpersonal  skills.      

 4.   Use  the  collaborative  relationship  to  develop  a  mutually  agreed-­‐on  focus  of  work  and  desired  outcomes.  

   

ASSESS    1.   Collect,  organize,  and  interpret  client  system  data.      

 2.   Assess  client  system  strengths  and  challenges.      

 3.   Develop  mutually  agreed-­‐on  intervention  goals  and  objectives.  

   

 4.   Select  appropriate  prevention/intervention  strategies.      

INTERVENE    1.   Help  client  systems  address  problems  and  foster  

resiliency.      

 2.   Negotiate,  mediate,  and  advocate  with  client  systems.      

 3.   Initiate  actions  to  implement  prevention/intervention  strategies  to  enhance  client  system  capacities.  

   

 4.   Initiate  actions  consistent  with  organizational  goals.      EVALUATE  

Page 43: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

43

43

 1.   Critically  analyze,  and  evaluate  interventions.      

 2.   Continuously  monitor  progress  toward  goals  and  respond  accordingly.  

   

 3.   Evaluate  outcomes  through  use  of  multiple  sources  and  types  of  data  

   

END    1.   Facilitate  transitions  and  endings.  

     

 2.   Plan  for,  integrate,  and  promote  sustainable  and  transferable  client  system  change.  

   

      Student  Comments:         FWI  Comments:        

 SENIOR  -­‐  FINAL  OVERALL  EVALUATION:  

 Please  check  one  of  the  following  at  the  final  evaluation.        

This   student   has   excelled   in   the   senior   field   placement   by   performing   above  expectations   for   students.   This   student   is   ready   for   beginning   generalist   social  work  practice.  

  This   student   has   met   the   expectations   of   the   senior   field   placement.     This  

student  is  ready  for  beginning  generalist  social  work  practice.    

This  student  is  not  yet  ready  for  generalist  social  work  practice.    

This   student   is   not   yet   ready   for   generalist   social   work   practice,   and   has  demonstrated   serious   problems   in   performance,   and   perhaps   should   be  encouraged  to  pursue  another  career  path.  

 If  you  have  not  previously  done  so  in  the  comment  sections,  please  identify  2  areas  of  student  strengths  and  2  areas  for  improvement:    STRENGTHS:  1.  

Page 44: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

44

44

   2.      AREAS  FOR  IMPROVEMENT:  1.      2.  

*The  following  section  should  be  completed  by  the  student:    My  agency  supervisor  has  discussed  this  evaluation  with  me,  and  I  have  received  a  copy.    My  agreement  or  disagreement  follows:    

  I  agree  with  the  evaluation       Comments:    

  I  do  not  agree  with  evaluation       Comments:    

                             Signature  of  Fieldwork  Instructor:    ________________________________Date:            Student’s  Signature:                   Date:                Field  Faculty  Liaison  Signature:               Date:                    

Page 45: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

45

45

Appendix C

COAT Survey 1.1a I know what it means to be a professional social worker. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

1.1b I conduct myself as a professional social worker. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

1.2a I reflect upon my social work practice. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

1.2b I make changes to my practice when necessary. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

1.2c I work to continually improve my practice through professional development. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

1.3a I maintain appropriate professional roles. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

Page 46: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

46

46

1.3b I maintain appropriate professional boundaries. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

1.4a I demonstrate appropriate professional behavior. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

1.4b My appearance demonstrates appropriate professional behavior. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

1.4c I communicate in a way that demonstrates appropriate professional demeanor. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

1.5a I am aware of the professional expectation of on-going professional development including the licensure standards for continuing education. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

1.6a I seek support, feedback, and consultation from my supervisors and colleagues. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

Page 47: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

47

47

2.1a I recognize and manage my personal values. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

2.1b I use professional rather than personal values to guide my practice. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

2.2a I use appropriate professional standards such as the NASW Code of Ethics, MN Licensing Standards, and the International Federation of Social Workers/International Association of Schools of Social Work Ethics in Social Work, Statement of Principles to guide ethical decision making in my practice. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

2.3a I am able to accept ambiguity in making ethical decisions in my practiced. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

2.4a I apply ethical decision-making principles in my social work practice. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

3.1a I apply cultural knowledge in making professional decisions. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

Page 48: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

48

48

3.1b I apply research-based knowledge in making professional decisions. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

3.1c I apply knowledge about the local community in making professional decisions. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

3.1d I apply practice wisdom in making professional decisions. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

3.2a I think critically about models of assessment. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

3.2b I think critically about models of prevention and intervention. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

3.2c I think critically about models of evaluation. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

Page 49: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

49

49

3.3a My verbal communication in working with client systems and colleagues is clear and effective m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

3.4a My written communication in working with client systems and colleagues is clear and effective. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

3.5a I think critically when communicating with others. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

3.5b I think critically when making decisions. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

4.1a I reflect on my personal culture-of-origin. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

4.2a I recognize the ways a culture’s structure and values may oppress, marginalize, or alienate some groups. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

Page 50: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

50

50

4.2b I recognize the ways a culture’s structure and values may enhance privilege and empower some groups. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

4.3a I continuously self-assess my own social position within social power structures. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

4.3b I minimize the influence of my own personal biases and values in working with diverse groups. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

4.4a I recognize the importance of difference in shaping life experiences. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

4.4b I communicate an understanding of the importance of difference in shaping life experiences in my practice. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

4.5a In my professional life, I view myself as a learner. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

Page 51: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

51

51

4.5b I view my clients as informants who help me understand their situations. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

4.6a I recognize strengths in all cultures. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

4.6b I individualize my work with clients to acknowledge their cultural strengths. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

5.1a I understand the forms and mechanics of oppression and discrimination. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

5.1b I understand how oppression and discrimination change over time. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

5.2a I advocate for human rights in my work with clients at all levels of practice. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

Page 52: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

52

52

5.2b I advocate for social and economic justice in my work with clients at all levels of practice. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

5.3a I work to advance social and economic justice. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

5.4a I apply Social Work for Social Justice Principles in my practice. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

5.4b I apply the United Nation’s Declaration of Human Rights in my practice. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

6.1a I develop research questions to answer questions from my practice. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

6.1b I use scientific methods to answer questions that arise in my practice. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

Page 53: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

53

53

6.2a I use research evidence to inform my practice. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

7.1a I know what a conceptual framework is. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

7.1b I use conceptual frameworks to guide all stages of my practice. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

7.2a I critically analyze knowledge about person and environment. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

7.2b I apply knowledge to understand person and environment. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

7.3a I apply a bio/psycho/social/spiritual/cultural perspective to practice with small client systems (individuals, families, and groups). m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

Page 54: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

54

54

7.3b I apply a bio/psycho/social/spiritual/cultural perspective to practice with large client systems (organizations and communities). m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

8.1a I understand the impact that social policy has on systems of all sizes. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

8.1b I understand the impact that organizational policy and agency delivery systems has on systems of all sizes. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

8.2a I analyze and formulate policies that advance social well being. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

8.2b I advocate for policies that advance a just society. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

8.3a I collaborate with others to advance effective policy action. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

Page 55: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

55

55

8.3b I work with systems of all sizes to advance effective policy action. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

9.1a I stay current on social trends and scientific developments. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

9.1b I stay current on new technological developments. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

9.1c I use emerging information and technology to provide relevant services. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

9.2a I assume leadership in promoting changes in service delivery systems. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

9.2b I assume leadership in improving the quality of social services. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

Page 56: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

56

56

10A1a I prepare mindfully for work with small client systems (individuals, families, and groups). m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

10A1b I prepare mindfully for work with large client systems (organizations and communities). m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

10A2a I am able to establish rapport and build effective relationships with small client systems (individuals, families, and groups). m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

10A2b I am able to establish rapport and build effective relationships with large client systems (organizations and communities). m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

10A3a I use empathy and other interpersonal skills with small client systems (individuals, families, and groups). m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

Page 57: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

57

57

10A3b I use empathy and other interpersonal skills with large client systems (organizations and communities). m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

10A4a I collaborate with small client systems (individuals, families, and groups) and colleagues to develop desired outcomes. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

10A4b I collaborate with large client systems (organizations and communities) and colleagues to develop desired outcomes. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

10B1a I collect, organize, and interpret data to assess small client systems (individuals, families, and groups). m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

10B1b I collect, organize, and interpret data to assess large client systems (organizations and communities). m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

Page 58: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

58

58

10B2a I assess strengths and challenges for small client systems (individuals, families, and groups). m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

10B2b I assess strengths and challenges for large client systems (organizations and communities). m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

10B3a I collaborate with small client systems (individuals, families, and groups) to develop mutually agreed upon intervention goals and objectives. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

10B3b I collaborate with large client systems (organizations and communities) to develop mutually agreed upon intervention goals and objectives. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

10B4a I select appropriate prevention/intervention strategies for obtaining goals with small client systems (individuals, families, and groups). m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

Page 59: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

59

59

10B4b I select appropriate prevention/intervention strategies for obtaining goals with large client systems (organizations and communities). m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

10C1a I help small client systems (individuals, families, and groups) address problems and foster resiliency. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

10C1b I help large client systems (organizations and communities) address problems and foster resiliency. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

10C2a I negotiate, mediate, and advocate with small client systems (individuals, families, and groups). m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

10C2b I negotiate, mediate, and advocate with large client systems (organizations and communities). m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

Page 60: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

60

60

10C3a I initiate actions to implement prevention/intervention strategies to enhance small client systems (individuals, families, and groups) capacities. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

10C3b I initiate actions to implement prevention/intervention strategies to enhance large client systems (organizations and communities) capacities. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

10C4a I initiate actions consistent with organizational goals. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

10D1a I critically analyze, and evaluate interventions with small client systems (individuals, families, and groups). m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

10D1b I critically analyze, and evaluate interventions with large client systems (organizations and communities). m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

Page 61: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

61

61

10D2a I continuously monitor progress toward goals with small client systems (individuals, families, and groups) and respond accordingly. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

10D2b I continuously monitor progress toward goals with large client systems (organizations and communities) and respond accordingly. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

10D3a I evaluate outcomes with small client systems (individuals, families, and groups) through use of multiple sources and types of data. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

10D3b I evaluate outcomes with large client systems (organizations and communities) through use of multiple sources and types of data. m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

10E1a I facilitate transitions and endings with small client systems (individuals, families, and groups). m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

Page 62: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

62

62

10E1b I facilitate transitions and endings with large client systems (organizations and communities). m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

10E2a I plan for and promote sustainable client system change with small client systems (individuals, families, and groups). m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

10E2b I plan for and promote sustainable client system change with large client systems (organizations and communities). m I am currently not competent in this area. (1) m I am beginning my journey towards competence in this area (2) m I show evidence of progress towards competence in this area. (3) m I am approaching full competence this area. (4) m I demonstrate full competence in this area for beginning generalist social work practice. (5)

Q107 What program are you in? m SCU Weekend (1) m SCU Day (2) m UST Day (3)

Q114 Are you a transfer student? m Yes (1) m No (2)

Q108 Does your university consider you a ... m Freshman (1) m Sophomore (2) m Junior (3) m Senior (4) m Super Senior (5)

Q109 How many hours per week do you work for pay (not counting internships or volunteer work)? Q111 How old are you?

Page 63: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

63

63

Q112 What class are you taking this survey in? m Introduction to Social Work (1) m Generalist Practice II: Large Client Systems (2)

Page 64: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

64

64

Appendix D 2012-2013 Field Ratings of Practice Behavior

FIELD EVALUATIONS Practice Behavior Means Ratings

*(n/a) Competency/ Practice Behavior JR

Student (n=63)

JR Field Instructor (n=63)

SR Student (n=54)

SR Field Instructor (n=54)

Competency 1: C2. 1.1 —Identify as a professional social worker and conduct oneself accordingly.

2.86 2.83 4.72 4.65

1-advocate for client access to the services of social work at the micro, mezzo, and macro levels.

2.61 (6)

2.80 (3) 4.53 (1) 4.58 (1)

2-practice personal reflection and self-correction to assure continual professional development.

2.86 2.97 4.76 4.67

3-attend to professional roles and boundaries. 2.97 2.95 4.80 4.74 4-demonstrate professional demeanor in behavior, appearance, and communication.

2.95 2.94 4.78 4.63

5-engage in life-long professional learning. 2.87 2.90 4.69 4.63 6-use supervision and consultation. 2.86 2.94 4.76 4.63 Competency 2: Apply social work ethical principles to guide professional practice.

2.80 2.91 4.66 4.66

1-continuously recognize and manage personal values in a way that allows professional values to guide practice.

2.87 2.97 4.8 4.72

2-make ethical decisions by applying standards of the National Association of Social Workers Code of Ethics (NASW, 2008) and, as applicable, of the International Federation of Social Workers/ International Association of Schools of Social Work Ethics in Social Work, Statement of Principles (IFSW, 2004), of the Minnesota Board of Social Work (MBSW, 2005) and as appropriate other codes of ethics.

2.79 (1)

2.95 (1) 4.63 4.69

3-tolerate ambiguity in resolving ethical conflicts.

2.76 (1)

2.84 (1) 4.63 4.69

4-apply strategies of ethical reasoning to arrive at principled decisions.

2.77 (1)

2.87 (1) 4.57 4.63

Competency 3: Apply critical thinking to inform and communicate professional judgments.

2.76 2.88 4.70 4.61

1-distinguish, appraise, and integrate multiple sources of knowledge, including research-

2.78 2.44 4.67 4.59

Page 65: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

65

65

based knowledge, community and cultural resources, and practice wisdom. 2-analyze models of assessment, prevention, intervention, evaluation, and ending.

2.65 (6)

2.85 (4) 4.63 4.5

3-demonstrate effective oral communication in working with individuals, families, groups, organizations, communities, and colleagues.

2.78 2.86 4.72 4.67

4-demonstrate effective written communication in working with individuals, families, groups, organizations, communities, and colleagues.

2.82 (1)

2.89 4.74 4.61

5-utilize skills and processes of critical thinking to guide communication and decision-making.

2.78 2.87 4.72 4.67

Competency 4: Engage diversity and difference in practice.

2.89 2.94 4.78 4.73

1-engage in cultural self-study. 2.90 (1)

2.90 (1) 4.72 4.63

2-recognize the extent to which a culture’s structures and values may oppress, marginalize, alienate, create or enhance privilege and power.

2.83 2.92 4.76 4.72

3-engage in continuous self-assessment of one’s social location within social power structures to minimize the influence of personal biases and values in working with diverse groups.

2.87 2.92 4.67 4.63

4-recognize and communicate their understanding of the importance of difference in shaping life experiences.

2.87 2.92 4.76 4.76

5-view themselves as learners and engage those with whom they work as informants.

2.90 2.98 4.87 4.76

6-recognize and appreciate strengths across cultures.

2.97 2.97 4.89 4.89

Competency 5: Advance human rights and social and economic justice.

2.70 2.85 4.57 4.59

1-understand the forms and mechanisms of oppression and discrimination and the changing nature of those systems.

2.76 2.86 4.70 4.65

2-advocate for human rights and social and economic justice.

2.72 (3)

2.85 (2) 4.60 (2) 4.62 (2)

3-engage in practices that advance social and economic justice.

2.71 2.90 (1) 4.42 (2) 4.54 (2)

4-engage in advancing social and economic justice by applying Social Work for Social Justice Principles, the United Nation’s Declaration of Human Rights, and other perspectives on social justice.

2.62 2.80 (2) 4.53 (1) 4.53 (1)

Competency 6: Engage in research-informed practice and practice-informed

2.63 2.79 4.33 4.35

Page 66: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

66

66

research. 1-use practice experience to inform scientific inquiry

2.49 (2)

2.74 (5) 4.22 (3) 4.28 (4)

2-use research evidence to inform practice. 2.75 2.84 (1) 4.43 (1) 4.40 (1) Competency 7: Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment.

2.78 2.86 4.71 4.64

1-utilize conceptual frameworks to guide the processes of engagement, assessment, prevention/intervention, evaluation, and ending.

2.71 (5)

2.85 (2) 4.74 4.65

2-critically analyze and apply knowledge to understand person and environment.

2.87 (1)

2.92 (1) 4.67 4.63

3-apply the multidimensional concepts of bio/psycho/social/spiritual/cultural perspective to social work practice on the micro, mezzo, and macro levels.

2.78 2.83 4.72 4.65

Competency 8: Engage in policy practice to advance social and economic well-being and to deliver effective social work services.

2.69 2.79 4.46 4.54

1- understand the impact that social and organizational policy and agency delivery systems has on individuals, groups, families, organizations, and communities.

2.82 (1)

2.92 (1) 4.67 4.69

2- analyze, formulate, and advocate for policies that advance well-being and a just society;

2.59 (5)

2.73 (4) 4.38 4.51 (3)

3- collaborate with colleagues and individuals, groups, families, organizations, and communities for effective policy action.

2.62 (3)

2.76 (5) 4.3 4.39 (3)

Competency 9: Respond to contexts that shape practice.

2.58 2.75 4.58 4.56

1 -continuously discover, appraise, and attend to changing locales, populations, scientific and technological developments, and emerging societal trends to provide relevant services.

2.6 2.79 (2) 4.63 4.61

2- provide leadership in promoting sustainable changes in service delivery and practice to improve the quality of social services.

2.54 (2)

2.71 (4) 4.53 (1) 4.51 (1)

Competency 10A: Engage client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

2.89 2.94 4.85 4.87

1 -mindfully prepare for action with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.

2.86 2.94 4.80 4.85

2 -establish rapport and build effective relationships.

2.90 (1)

2.97 (1) 4.87 4.91

3 -use empathy and other interpersonal skills. 2.94 (1)

2.95 (1) 4.93 4.91

Page 67: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

67

67

4 -use the collaborative relationship to develop a mutually agreed-on focus of work and desired outcomes.

2.90 (1)

2.97 (1) 4.81 4.80

Competency 10B: Assess client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

2.79 2.90 4.72 4.71

1 -collect, organize, and interpret client system data.

2.77 (2)

2.89 (2) 4.67 4.67

2 -assess client system strengths and challenges.

2.83 (3)

2.93 (3) 4.78 4.76

3 -develop mutually agreed-on intervention goals and objectives.

2.79 (5)

2.88 (3) 4.76 4.76

4 -select appropriate prevention/intervention strategies.

2.78 (4)

2.90 (3) 4.69 4.67

Competency 10C: Intervene with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

2.69 2.87 4.63 4.65

1 -help client systems address problems and foster resiliency.

2.77 (3)

2.92 (3) 4.63 4.69

2 -negotiate, mediate, and advocate with client systems.

2.64 (4)

2.83 (3) 4.52 4.61

3 -initiate actions to implement prevention/ intervention strategies to enhance client system capacities.

2.61 (4)

2.88 (4) 4.61 4.57

4-initiate actions consistent with organizational goals.

2.77 (2)

2.89 (1) 4.78 4.74

Competency 10D: Evaluate client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

2.65 2.83 4.61 4.61

1- critically analyze, and evaluate interventions.

2.67 (3)

2.85 (3) 4.57 4.56

2 -continuously monitor progress toward goals and respond accordingly.

2.67 (3)

2.85 (3) 4.70 4.69

3 -evaluate outcomes through use of multiple sources and types of data.

2.63 (7)

2.79 (6) 4.55 (1) 4.58 (1)

Competency 10E: End with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

2.61 2.81 4.63 4.64

1 -facilitate transitions and endings. 2.61 (4)

2.82 (3) 4.65

4.70

2 -plan for, integrate, and promote sustainable and transferable client system change.

2.62 (3)

2.81 (4)

4.61

4.59

Page 68: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

68

68

Appendix E 2012-13 COAT Competency Ratings of Practice Behaviors

Competency/ Practice Behavior Posttest

% who rated 4.2 or higher

Competency 1: C2. 1.1 —Identify as a professional social worker and conduct oneself accordingly.

95.7

1-advocate for client access to the services of social work at the micro, mezzo, and macro levels.

89.1

2-practice personal reflection and self-correction to assure continual professional development.

80.4

3-attend to professional roles and boundaries. 89.1 4-demonstrate professional demeanor in behavior, appearance, and communication. 97.8 5-engage in life-long professional learning. 78.3 6-use supervision and consultation. 82.6 Competency 2: Apply social work ethical principles to guide professional practice.

89.1

1-continuously recognize and manage personal values in a way that allows professional values to guide practice.

89.1

2-make ethical decisions by applying standards of the National Association of Social Workers Code of Ethics (NASW, 2008) and, as applicable, of the International Federation of Social Workers/ International Association of Schools of Social Work Ethics in Social Work, Statement of Principles (IFSW, 2004), of the Minnesota Board of Social Work (MBSW, 2005) and as appropriate other codes of ethics.

73.3

3-tolerate ambiguity in resolving ethical conflicts. 76.1 4-apply strategies of ethical reasoning to arrive at principled decisions. 84.4 Competency 3: Apply critical thinking to inform and communicate professional judgments.

93.5

1-distinguish, appraise, and integrate multiple sources of knowledge, including research-based knowledge, community and cultural resources, and practice wisdom.

89.1

2-analyze models of assessment, prevention, intervention, evaluation, and ending. 87.0 3-demonstrate effective oral communication in working with individuals, families, groups, organizations, communities, and colleagues.

86.7

4-demonstrate effective written communication in working with individuals, families, groups, organizations, communities, and colleagues.

88.6

5-utilize skills and processes of critical thinking to guide communication and decision-making.

87.0

Competency 4: Engage diversity and difference in practice. 97.8 1-engage in cultural self-study. 80.4 2-recognize the extent to which a culture’s structures and values may oppress, marginalize, alienate, create or enhance privilege and power.

82.6

3-engage in continuous self-assessment of one’s social location within social power structures to minimize the influence of personal biases and values in working with diverse groups.

89.1

Page 69: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

69

69

4-recognize and communicate their understanding of the importance of difference in shaping life experiences.

97.8

5-view themselves as learners and engage those with whom they work as informants. 97.8 6-recognize and appreciate strengths across cultures. 91.3 Competency 5: Advance human rights and social and economic justice. 87.0 1-understand the forms and mechanisms of oppression and discrimination and the changing nature of those systems.

84.8

2-advocate for human rights and social and economic justice. 76.1 3-engage in practices that advance social and economic justice. 76.1 4-engage in advancing social and economic justice by applying Social Work for Social Justice Principles, the United Nation’s Declaration of Human Rights, and other perspectives on social justice.

80.4

Competency 6: Engage in research-informed practice and practice-informed research.

63.0

1-use practice experience to inform scientific inquiry 54.3 2-use research evidence to inform practice. 58.7 Competency 7: Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment. 89.1 1-utilize conceptual frameworks to guide the processes of engagement, assessment, prevention/intervention, evaluation, and ending.

80.4

2-critically analyze and apply knowledge to understand person and environment. 89.1 3-apply the multidimensional concepts of bio/psycho/social/spiritual/cultural perspective to social work practice on the micro, mezzo, and macro levels.

82.6

Competency 8: Engage in policy practice to advance social and economic well-being and to deliver effective social work services.

65.2

1- understand the impact that social and organizational policy and agency delivery systems has on individuals, groups, families, organizations, and communities.

76.1

2- analyze, formulate, and advocate for policies that advance well-being and a just society;

63.0

3- collaborate with colleagues and individuals, groups, families, organizations, and communities for effective policy action.

54.3

Competency 9: Respond to contexts that shape practice. 63.0 1 -continuously discover, appraise, and attend to changing locales, populations, scientific and technological developments, and emerging societal trends to provide relevant services.

71.7

2- provide leadership in promoting sustainable changes in service delivery and practice to improve the quality of social services.

67.4

Competency 10A: Engage client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

87.0

1 -mindfully prepare for action with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.

78.3

2 -establish rapport and build effective relationships. 89.1 3 -use empathy and other interpersonal skills. 87.0 4 -use the collaborative relationship to develop a mutually agreed-on focus of work and desired outcomes.

82.6

Competency 10B: Assess client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

80.4

1 -collect, organize, and interpret client system data. 65.2 2 -assess client system strengths and challenges. 76.1

Page 70: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

70

70

3 -develop mutually agreed-on intervention goals and objectives. 76.1 4 -select appropriate prevention/intervention strategies. 73.9 Competency 10C: Intervene with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

73.9

1 -help client systems address problems and foster resiliency. 76.1 2 -negotiate, mediate, and advocate with client systems. 67.4 3 -initiate actions to implement prevention/ intervention strategies to enhance client system capacities.

69.6

4-initiate actions consistent with organizational goals. 76.1 Competency 10D: Evaluate client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

65.2

1- critically analyze, and evaluate interventions. 65.2 2 -continuously monitor progress toward goals and respond accordingly. 69.6 3 -evaluate outcomes through use of multiple sources and types of data. 65.2 Competency 10E: End with client systems of all sizes (individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities).

78.3

1 -facilitate transitions and endings. 73.9 2 -plan for, integrate, and promote sustainable and transferable client system change. 73.9

Page 71: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

71

71

Appendix F Climate Survey (Implicit Curriculum)

Q1 Please identify the extent to which you agree with the following questions regarding the SCU/UST Social Work (SCU/UST SSW). Strongly

Disagree (1) Disagree (2) Neither Agree

nor Disagree (3)

Agree (4) Strongly Agree (5)

I feel pressure to fit in at the SCU/UST SSW (1)

m m m m m

The SCU/UST School of Social Work encourages discussions about issues of difference (2)

m m m m m

I feel free to speak up about diversity issues that are important to me in my classes at SCU/UST SSW. (3)

m m m m m

The SCU/UST SSW demonstrates commitment to social justice.

m m m m m

Q2 Have you witnessed or experienced discrimination and/or harassment within the SCU/UST School of Social Work?

Yes Not Sure No

Q3 When have I experienced or witnessed discrimination or harassment, I feel that SCU/UST School of Social Work responded effectively to address the problem.

Strongly disagree Disagree Neither Agree nor Disagree Agree Strongly Agree

Page 72: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

72

72

Q4 In classes and other events at the SCU/UST School of Social Work, we have discussed........

Strongly Disagree (1) Disagree (2)

Neither Agree nor Disagree

(3) Agree (4) Strongly Agree

(5)

Sexuality (1) m m m m m Race and Ethnicity (2) m m m m m

Religion and Spirituality (3) m m m m m

Ability and Disability (4) m m m m m

Social Class (5) m m m m m Age Issues (6) m m m m m Q2 The SCU/UST School of Social Work (SCU/UST SSW) demonstrates a meaningful commitment to diversity in

Strongly Disagree (1) Disagree (2)

Neither Agree nor Disagree

(3) Agree (4) Strongly Agree

(5)

Curriculum (1) m m m m m Field Education (2) m m m m m

Faculty (3) m m m m m Administration and Staff (4) m m m m m

Student Recruitment and Admission (5)

m m m m m

Q3 I am treated with respect in the SCU/UST School of Social Work.

Strongly Disagree (1) Disagree (2)

Neither Agree nor Disagree

(3) Agree (4) Strongly Agree

(5)

By faculty (1) m m m m m By administration and staff (2)

m m m m m

By my fellow students at the School (3)

m m m m m

Page 73: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

73

73

Q5 If I had a concern about the program at the SCU/UST School of Social Work, I would feel comfortable contacting....

Strongly Disagree (1) Disagree (2)

Neither Agree nor Disagree

(3) Agree (4) Strongly Agree

(5)

Classroom faculty (1) m m m m m

My advisor (2) m m m m m BSW Program Director (3) m m m m m

Dean (4) m m m m m Q6 Please rate the extent to which you are satisfied with the following aspects of the BSW program at the SCU/UST School of Social Work

Very Dissatisfied (1) Dissatisfied (2)

Neither satisfied nor

Dissatisfied (3) Satisfied (4) Very Satisfied

(5)

Course Work (1) m m m m m

Faculty Advising (2) m m m m m

Opportunities for Student Research (3)

m m m m m

Admission to Major Process (4)

m m m m m

Social Work Club (5) m m m m m

Beta Epsilon Student Honor Society (6)

m m m m m

Page 74: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

74

74

Q7 Please indicate the activites you participated in during your time as a student at the SCU/UST School of Social Work Participated (1) Did Not Participate (2) Social Work Club (1) m m Day at the Capitol (2) m m Service Projects (3) m m Salons (4) m m Justice Lecture (5) m m Room at the Table (6) m m Institutes (Group work, Supervision, Spirituality) (7) m m

Licensure Preparation (8) m m Beta Epsilon Honor Society (9) m m Q8 The SCU/UST School of Social Work encourages students to participate in the above activities m Strongly Disagree (1) m Disagree (2) m Neither Agree nor Disagree (3) m Agree (4) m Strongly Agree (5)

Q9 Please identify the supports you used while you were a student in the SCU/UST School of Social Work Used this Resource (1) Did not use this Resource (2) Writing Assistance (1) m m Accommodation for a Disability (2) m m

Tutoring (3) m m Financial Aid (4) m m Scholarships (5) m m Faculty Recommendations or References (6) m m

Informal consultation with faculty (7) m m

Parenting Supports (e.g. day care (8) m m

University Counseling Services m m University Academic Advising m m Other (please identify) (9) m m

Page 75: 2013 BSW Outcome Report Final - University of St. …BSW Program Outcome Study 2012-2013 Academic Year Final Report Prepared by Kendra J. Garrett, Ph.D. and Carey Winkler, M.S.W. 2012-13

2012-13 Outcome Report

75

75

Appendix G Changes Made to Curriculum as a Result of 2012-2013 Outcome Study

(to be completed summer 2014)