2011 Rate Comments

download 2011 Rate Comments

of 2

Transcript of 2011 Rate Comments

  • 8/8/2019 2011 Rate Comments

    1/2

    To: Director Judy Schurke, Director, Department of Labor and Industries

    From: Carl Gipson, Director for Small Business, Washington Policy Center

    Re: Written Comments Regarding the Departments 2011 Proposed Rate Hike

    Date: January 4, 2011

    Dear Director Schurke,

    The Department of Labor and Industries finds itself stuck in an unenviable corner. The last

    several years have not been kind to the employment market nor the stock market, and both

    have wreaked havoc on the financial stability of Washingtons workers compensation system.

    However, placing an average 12 percent cost increase on the backs of the struggling business

    community may only serve to further dampen the economic recovery our state so desperately

    needs.

    A newly-released financial audit by the State Auditors Office (SAO) confirms Washington Policy

    Centers recommendations that the old way of doing things simply must end. As of June 30,

    2010, the Accident Fund was $358 million in the red and the Medical Aid funds contingency

    reserve, although slightly rebounded from the ultimate low of a year before, is still a paltry $539

    million; less than half of what it was in 2007.

    The State Auditors report attributed the dismal financial situation in the workers comp funds to

    the following factors:

    The reverberating effects of the downturn in employment, leading to decreased

    premiums into the system.

    Increased spending on insurance claims. The SAO report cited The growing duration of

    time loss claims and frequency of pension awards, as contributing to this problem.

    Insufficient premium rates for at least the past three years have underfunded the

    workers compensation system.

    Obviously no forecaster, L&Is or otherwise, could have predicted the calamitous fall in

    private sector employment between 2007 and the present day. However, the Department

    and policymakers must share the blame for increased spending on insurance claims and

    underfunding the system.

  • 8/8/2019 2011 Rate Comments

    2/2

    For years the business community has warned that Washingtons time loss system is overly

    generous, resulting in a disproportionately expensive system that is funded by workers and

    employers alike. The latest figures place the average time loss duration at over 280 days. This

    falls far outside the normative range of other states (45 day mean, 125 day median). Indeed,

    even your own Departments analysis show that eight percent of claims account for 88% ofsystem costs.

    Though the State Auditor recommended that the Accident Fund should increase by about five

    percent more than the proposed 2011 rate (29.8% increase) and the Medical Aid Fund should

    increase by 12% as opposed to your plan of reducing the rate by 10%, we feel that raising the

    funds by the suggested amount will not solve the structural problems inherent in the system and

    will only provide further disincentives for private sector businesses to increase employment.

    There is no silver bullet solution, but there have been several legislative proposals in the last

    few years that would directly address some of the underlying problems. These include: 1)

    Allowing for Medical Provider Networks, 2) allowing for final settlement agreements, and; 3)

    better defining what constitutes an occupational disease.

    These three options garnered bi-partisan support in the legislature in 2010, but received no

    support from leadership and no support, from what we could tell, from your office.

    The state legislature has failed time and again to show leadership on this issue. This 2011

    rate increase is a symptom of the larger problem of policymakers refusing to act with the best

    interest of Washingtons economy in mind by reforming the system.

    The three recommendations included here will not solve the systems financial problemsovernight. But it will accomplish two important goals: 1) demonstrate to the business community

    that policymakers and the Department are serious about addressing the problems they have

    acknowledged for years but have refused to act on, and; 2) steer the workers compensation

    system towards the long-term goal of financial sustainability while protecting and helping injured

    workers who need rehabilitation in order to return to the job site.

    Submitted respectfully,

    Carl Gipson

    Director for Small Business

    Washington Policy Center

    206.937.9691

    [email protected]

    cc: Ronald Moore, Employer Services Program Manager, Department of Labor and Industries