2008 D&O Symposium Symposium New York City ~ February 6 & 7, 2008 Life Cycle(s) of an IPO Company.
-
Upload
aileen-mckinney -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of 2008 D&O Symposium Symposium New York City ~ February 6 & 7, 2008 Life Cycle(s) of an IPO Company.
2008 D&O2008 D&O SymposiumSymposium
New York City ~ February 6 & 7, 2008
Life Cycle(s) of an IPO Life Cycle(s) of an IPO CompanyCompany
Life Cycle of an Life Cycle of an IPO Company IPO Company
• MODERATOR: Megan Colwell, Senior Vice President
Woodruff-Sawyer & Co.• Matthew Deneen, RPLU, Senior Vice President
Hooghuis Group, LLC• Deirdre Finn, Senior Vice President
Navigators Pro• Lauri Floresca, Senior Managing Director
Carpenter Moore, a NASDAQ Company• Keith Thomas, Executive Vice President
Zurich Management Solutions Group• Michael Torpey, Partner
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Case Study Case Study YellowWire, Inc.YellowWire, Inc.
• Headquarters: Santa Clara, CA
• Founded: 2001
• Market segment: Telecom
• Revenue: $8.5M as of YE05
• Management team: founders
• Funding: $15M via Rounds A & B
• Company valuation: $25M
Reverse Merger History Reverse Merger History and Perceptionsand Perceptions
• Historical View: Checkered past in the 70’s, 80’s and 90’s with “Pump and Dump schemes”.
Mergers-R-Us.com http://www.mergers-r-us.com/index.html
GoPublicUSA.comhttp://www.gopublicusa.com/main.html
“Take your private company public the easy way by purchasing a dormant, public shell company through a process known as a reverse merger...”
Successful Reverse Successful Reverse MergersMergers
• Texas Instruments Inc. • Berkshire Hathaway Inc. • Tandy Corporation (Radio Shack
Corporation) • Occidental Petroleum Corporation • Blockbuster Entertainment • The New York Stock Exchange• Frederick’s of Hollywood (1/28/08)
Reverse Mergers:Reverse Mergers:How Popular Are They?How Popular Are They?
Annual growth trends: 2003 2004 2005 2006
46 168 179 206
Q107: 53 RM’s/$3B Mkt cap = +100% growth
• University of Pittsburgh study: 91% of the companies that performed a RM
are still in existence three years later.
““Formerly Shady Reverse Formerly Shady Reverse Mergers Gain Credibility”Mergers Gain Credibility”
USA TODAYUSA TODAY, 6/28/07, 6/28/07
(1) New SEC rules in past five years
(2) IPO option: larger/more established companies (Post Dotcom/IPO Bubble)
2006: more reverse mergers than IPO’s
(3) SPAC’s (Special Purpose Acquisition Companies)
SPAC’s:SPAC’s:How Popular Are They?*How Popular Are They?*
• 2007: 65 SPAC’s went public = $11.7B• Average deal size: $183M (vs. IPO’s @ $229M) • Pipeline momentum
December 2007: 50% of new filings were SPAC’s January 2008: 7 of 13 new filings were SPAC’s
• Currently: 75 SPAC’s seeking acquisition/reverse merger
opportunities Flush with cash!
*Data from: Renaissance Capital’s SPAC Facts, Annual Review, January 2008
SPAC Statistics*SPAC Statistics*
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
No. of SPAC’s 1 12 28 34 65
Total Proceeds $24.2M $491.1M $2.1B $3.2B $11.7B
% IPO Market 1.5% 5.6% 14.4% 14.8% 23%
Avg SPAC Size $24.15M $40.9M $75M $95M $183M
Avg IPO Size $224M $198M $175M $217M $229M
*Data from: Renaissance Capital’s SPAC Facts, Annual Review, January 2008
““Traditional” Reverse Traditional” Reverse Merger—Shell CompanyMerger—Shell Company
• Reverse merger option
Faster, better, cheaper?
No real capital infusion; limited liquidity
PIPE financing = funding option