1230===LILIUM LONGIFLORUM+

download 1230===LILIUM LONGIFLORUM+

of 10

Transcript of 1230===LILIUM LONGIFLORUM+

  • 8/7/2019 1230===LILIUM LONGIFLORUM+

    1/10

    1230

    American Journal of Botany 88(7): 12301239. 2001.

    BIOGEOGRAPHY AND ORIGIN OF LILIUM LONGIFLORUMAND L . FORMOSANUM (LILIACEAE) ENDEMIC TO THE

    RYUKYU ARCHIPELAGO AND TAIWAN AS DETERMINED

    BY ALLOZYME DIVERSITY1

    MICHIKAZU HIRAMATSU,2,5 KAORI II,3 HIROSHI OKUBO,3

    KUANG LIANG HUANG,4 AND CHI WEI HUANG4

    2Laboratory of Agricultural Ecology, Faculty of Agriculture, Graduate School, Kyushu University, Kasuya 811-2307 Japan;3Laboratory of Horticultural Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Graduate School, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan; and

    4Department of Horticulture, National Chiayi University, Chiayi, Taiwan, Republic of China

    Allozyme diversity on 13 isozyme loci was investigated for two bulbous species, Lilium longiflorum and L. formosanum, endemic

    to the subtropical archipelago of continental origin located in East Asia. Degrees of allozyme variability and divergence for L.

    longiflorum were very high for insular endemic species, indicating relatively longtime persistence of the present widespread distribution

    across many islands in this phenotypically little-changed species. Lilium formosanum exhibited rather lower variability and divergence

    than did L. longiflorum and was genetically close to the southern peripheral populations of L. longiflorum with 0.978 as its highest

    genetic identity value. Combined with other biological and insular geohistorical information, our results suggest that L. longiflorum

    was established around the end of the Pliocene when the current distribution area was still a continuous part of the ancient Asian

    continent, and L. formosanum was derived from southern populations of L. longiflorum around the late Pleistocene when the mainland

    of Taiwan was completely separated from the adjacent islands and the main continent. Depauperization of allozyme variability in some

    L. longiflorum populations was found on islands with lower altitudes. This reflects bottleneck effects after the complete or almost

    complete submergence of such low islands during the archipelagos development.

    Key words: allozyme diversity; biogeography; continental island; insular endemic; Liliaceae; Lilium; Taiwan; the Ryukyu Ar-

    chipelago.

    Island biotas have attracted evolutionary biologists since thetime of Darwin (see Adsersen, 1995 as a review). A basictheory holds that genetic depauperization of organisms pop-ulations and genetic differentiation among them, respectively,are promoted by bottlenecks created by diminishing popu-

    lation size and restricted gene flow from and into outer pop-ulations (Wright, 1931, 1943; Hartl, 1981; Kimura, 1983; Nei,1987). Thus, it can be easily assumed that disjunct geographicdistributions in islands, along with factors regarding migration(the founder principle) and isolation, greatly affect an organ-isms genetic structure in terms of its association with histor-ical events. In fact, information on genetic structure obtainedusing molecular techniques has accumulated recently in regardto flowering plants, further clarifying the way current biogeo-graphic structures have been established in relation to histor-ical events in islands (e.g., Witter and Carr, 1988; Inoue andKawahara, 1990; Crawford et al., 1992; DeJoode and Wendel,1992; Westerberg and Saura, 1994; Kim et al., 1996; Weller,Sakai, and Straub, 1996; Affre, Thompson, and Debussche,1997; Ito, 1998; Baldwin et al., 1999; Kim et al., 1999).

    These intensive studies simultaneously generated importantfindings, which are now widely accepted regarding the popu-lation and evolutionary biology of insular plants. First, withinan isolated island environment, evolution expressing extraor-dinary morphological and ecological divergence, namely,

    1 Manuscript received 25 April 2000; revision accepted 21 December 2000.The authors thank to M. Maki, Tohoku University, and Y. Ozaki, Kyushu

    University, for their comments on an early version of the manuscript. Thiswork was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Encouragement of YoungScientists from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture ofJapan (No. 09760036).

    5 Author for correspondence.

    adaptive radiation, can frequently occur with relatively littlemolecular divergence within a short time (see Crawford, 1990,for a review). Second, endemic island taxa often possess rel-atively limited amounts of genetic variation (see DeJoode andWendel, 1992; Weller, Sakai, and Straub, 1996; Frankham,

    1997, Gemmill et al., 1998 for reviews), though some re-searchers recently exhibited notable exceptions (Weller, Sakai,and Straub, 1996; Francisco-Ortega et al., 2000). These find-ings, however, have been concerned mostly with the taxa en-demic to oceanic islands, upon which organisms are estab-lished only through migration events from remote continents.

    The archipelago running from Ryukyu to Taiwan consistsof nearly 200 islands forming an arc-array in the subtropicalarea between Kyushu, the southwestern district of mainlandJapan, and the southeastern part of China. Since this archi-pelago is considered geologically to be of continental origin(Kimura, 1996), unlike oceanic islands such as Hawaii, its bi-ota is largely comprised of relict taxa, which presumably dif-ferentiated from their relatives in the adjacent continent ormainland (Kizaki and Oshiro, 1977). Thus, comparative phy-

    logeographic study between biota in this archipelago and thatin oceanic islands may potentially provide significant new in-sights into island biology. Studies focusing on combinationsof genetic population structures in relation to the biogeographyof relict organisms in the Ryukyu Archipelago and Taiwan,however, have almost entirely been devoted to animals suchas Plecoglossus altivelis (Nishida, 1985), Iriomote cats (Ma-suda and Yoshida, 1995), Gekko hokouensis (Toda, Hikida,and Ota, 1997), wood-feeding cockroaches (Maekawa et al.,1999), Indian rice frogs (Toda, 1999), and pit vipers (Toda etal., 1999). To our knowledge no such studies have been con-ducted regarding plants.

  • 8/7/2019 1230===LILIUM LONGIFLORUM+

    2/10

    July 2001] 1231HIRAMATSU ET AL.BIOGEOGRAPHY AND ORIGIN OF LILIUM

    Fig. 1. Geographic distribution of the Lilium longiflorum () and L. formosanum () populations studied. Closed areas of a small map are enlargedAbbreviations of population names are the same as those in Table 1.

    Lilium longiflorum and L. formosanum are bulbous plantsof the Liliaceae endemic to this archipelago and are widelyregarded as species of great importance for world horticulture(Miller, 1993; Okazaki, 1996; McRae, 1998). Both specieshave been taxonomically classified into the subsection of thesection Leucolirion by Comber (1949), and their interspecificfertile hybrid cultivars, L. formolongi imply that the twospecies are genetically close. Lilium longiflorum is geograph-ically distributed from the northernmost islands of the RyukyuArchipelago to the mainland seacoast and to small islands inthe eastern part of Taiwan, exhibiting a disjunct distributionfollowing a pattern of arc-arrayed steppingstones (Wilson,1925; Shimizu, 1987). On the other hand, L. formosanum is

    natively distributed solely, but widely, within the mainland ofTaiwan (Wilson, 1925; Shii, 1983). The combined distributionof the two species thus covers the entire archipelago acrossmany islands within an 1300 km range.

    Based on the abovementioned characteristics regardingstudy sites and plants, we expected that an analysis of thegenetic structure of these species would be significant not onlyin terms of what it might reveal regarding the phylogeneticrelationship of the two species, but also for verifying this re-lationships association with the historical geography in theRyukyu to Taiwan archipelago arc and the widely acceptedgeneralization regarding insular evolutionary biology assessed

    mostly in oceanic islands. Allozyme analysis is often employed for studying types of microevolution such as speciationand conspecific population differentiation (Crawford, 1990)Thus, we estimated allozyme diversity of L. longiflorum andL. formosanum in order to address the following questions: (1)When and how are the species established? (2) Does the ge-netic structure of their present populations reflect their ecological nature and/or the historical geography of the archipelago?(3) Are there any properties regarding allozyme diversity ex-pressed by other insular plant taxa?

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Plant materialsThe almost entire native distribution of 19 natural populations of L. longiflorum and eight natural populations of L. formosanum

    were studied (Fig. 1, Table 1). These two species are relatively similar in

    terms of their appearance but are easily distinguishable by their leaf mor

    phology: Lilium formosanum has willowy leaves, which are narrower and

    longer than those of L. longiflorum (Wilson, 1925; M. Hiramatsu, unpublished

    data). Capsules were collected in the study sites, and plant materials for en

    zyme analysis were grown in a greenhouse from air-dried seeds. A single

    progeny individual from each maternal genotype was used for the analysis

    Samples of each population comprised 1055 individuals (33 for L. longiflo

    rum and 25 for L. formosanum, on average).

    Isozyme electrophoresisApproximately 200 mg of young fresh leaf sam

  • 8/7/2019 1230===LILIUM LONGIFLORUM+

    3/10

    1232 [Vol. 88AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY

    TABLE 1. Study sites ofLilium longiflorum and L. formosanum populations indicated with number of individuals examined, population size (S,50; M, 500; L, 500), population altitude (m), and maximum island peak altitude (m).

    SpeciesPopulation

    abbreviation Locality

    No. ofindividualsexamined

    Populationsize

    Populationaltitude (m)

    Maximumisland peakaltitude (m)

    L. longiflorum LYALKILAM1LAM2LTO

    Yaku Shima, RyukyuKikai Jima, RyukyuAmami O Shima, RyukyuAmami O Shima, RyukyuTokuno Shima, Ryukyu

    3043232740

    SLLMM

    1010202010

    1935224694694645

    LOELYRLOK1LOK2LOK3

    Okino Erabu Jima, RyukyuYoron To, RyukyuOkinawa, RyukyuOkinawa, RyukyuOkinawa, Ryukyu

    3451111310

    MLSSS

    2020201010

    24697

    498498498

    LKULMILIS1LIS2LIR

    Kume Shima, RyukyuMiyako Jima, RyukyuIshigaki Jima, RyukyuIshigaki Jima, RyukyuIriomote Jima, Ryukyu

    4329555337

    LLLLM

    1020

    1101010

    310109526526469

    LYOLPILFULLA

    Yonaguni Jima, RyukyuPitouchiao, mainland of TaiwanFulung, mainland of TaiwanLanyu, Taiwan

    41372930

    LLSL

    2060

    2050

    23139973997

    552L. formosanum FWU

    FLIFHOFWS

    Wulai, mainland of TaiwanLishan, mainland of TaiwanHohuanshan, mainland of TaiwanWushe, mainland of Taiwan

    21183320

    MMLM

    600160030001100

    3997399739973997

    FSHFTAFPAFCH

    between Shuili and Ershui, mainland of TaiwanTatachia, mainland of TaiwanPaolai, mainland of Taiwannear Chihpen, mainland of Taiwan

    12334122

    SLLL

    4002600

    450700

    3997399739973997

    ples was placed into cooled mortars and homogenized with a pestle in 2 mL

    of the Tris-HCl grinding buffer (Soltis et al., 1983) with a sprinkle of poly-

    vinylpolypyrolidone and sea sand. Crude extracts were soaked by paper wicks

    (11 3 mm), and the wicks were inserted into a slit in a starch gel.

    Horizontal starch gel electrophoresis was carried out according to the pro-

    cedures described by Wendel and Weeden (1989). Two combinations of gel

    and electrode buffers were used to resolve 11 enzymes: aspartate aminotrans-ferase (AAT), catarase (CAT), diaphorase (DIA), glucose-6-phosphate isom-

    erase (GPI), glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), and malic enzyme (ME) were

    resolved using System 6, and fluorescent esterase (FEST), isocitrate dehydro-

    genase (IDH), malate dehydrogenase (MDH), phosphoglucomutase (PGM),

    and phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (6PGD) were determined using System

    2. Staining protocols were also carried out according to the method of Wendel

    and Weeden (1989), except for a modification for FEST by dilution of the

    substrate with 1/20th volume of acetone.

    Statistical analysisAllele frequencies in each population of the species

    were calculated for 13 loci encoding the 11 enzyme systems. The following

    parameters concerning genetic diversity were estimated at the population and

    species level in the manner described by Hamrick and Godt (1990): the pro-

    portion of polymorphic loci (Pp) at a 95% criterion, the number of alleles per

    polymorphic loci (Ap), the number of alleles per locus (A), and expected het-erozygosity (h), where h was an unbiased estimate (Nei and Roychoudhury,

    1974; Nei, 1978).

    To estimate genetic differentiation among populations, Neis (1973) gene

    diversity statistics, namely, total genetic diversity (HT), genetic diversity with-

    in populations (HS), and proportion of the total diversity among populations

    (GST), were determined. In addition, Wrights (1951) fixation index ( Fis) was

    estimated at each polymorphic locus as unbiased following the method of Nei

    and Chesser (1983). Chi-square analyses were performed to determine the

    heterogeneity of allelic frequencies among populations (Workman and Nis-

    wander, 1970) and to determine deviations from genotypic frequencies ex-

    pected under the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (Li and Horvitz, 1953).

    Unbiased genetic identity and genetic distance were calculated based on

    allele frequencies in accordance with the formula derived by Nei (1978). The

    resulting distance matrix among all populations of the two species was then

    used to construct a neighbor-joining tree (Saitou and Nei, 1987) using the

    NEIGHBOR and DRAWTREE programs of PHYLIP (Felsenstein, 1993).

    RESULTS

    Genetic variability at the species levelThirteen loci listedin Table 2 were consistently resolved. Of a total of 48 allelesdetected across the two species, 14 (Aat-2c, Aat-3c, Cat-1b,Fest-2a, Fest-2d, Gdh-1a, Gpi-2f, Mdh-1a, 6Pgd-1a, 6Pgd-1d,6Pgd-2a, Pgm-1a, Pgm-1b, and Pgm-1e) and 3 (Fest-2b, Fest-2g, and Gpi-2e), respectively, were unique for L. longiflorumand L. formosanum. In other words, 31 alleles (65%) werecommon to both species. The most frequent alleles of eachspecies were the same for ten loci (Aat-2b, Aat-3b, Cat-1a, Dia-1b, Gdh-1c, Idh-2a, Mdh-1c, Me-1a, 6Pgd-1c, and 6Pgd-2c),whereas they were different for the remaining three loci (Gpi-2d, Fest-2c, and Pgm-1c in L. longiflorum and Gpi-2c, Fest-2f,and Pgm-1d in L. formosanum). The two species were not dis-tinguishable by the different alleles, because they were not

    species specific.All (100%) of 13 resolved loci were polymorphic in at least

    one population in L. longiflorum, whereas 10 (77%) of 13 lociwere polymorphic in L. formosanum (Table 3), in which Aat-2, Cat-1, and Idh-2 were judged monomorphic (Table 2). Theother genetic diversity parameters, A, Ap, and h for L. longi-florum were 1.22.2 times larger than those for L. formo-sanum.

    Genetic variability at the population levelMean values ofPp, A, Ap, and h at the population level for L. longiflorum werealso substantially higher than those for L. formosanum (Table

  • 8/7/2019 1230===LILIUM LONGIFLORUM+

    4/10

    July 2001] 1233HIRAMATSU ET AL.BIOGEOGRAPHY AND ORIGIN OF LILIUM

    TABLE 2. Allele frequencies for 13 isozyme loci summarized in Liliumlongiflorum and L. formosanum.

    Locus Allele L. l on gi flo ru m L. f or mo sa nu m

    Aat-2 abc

    0.0440.9470.008

    0.0030.9970.000

    Aat-3 a

    bc

    0.097

    0.9020.002

    0.024

    0.9760.000

    Cat-1 ab

    0.9960.004

    1.0000.000

    Dia-1 abc

    0.0150.8390.146

    0.0100.9590.031

    Gdh-1 abc

    0.1430.7630.095

    0.0000.9900.010

    Gpi-2 abcdef

    0.0200.2870.1010.5300.0000.062

    0.0160.3430.6280.0020.0110.000

    Fest-2 a

    bcdefg

    0.167

    0.0000.4790.1720.0930.0880.000

    0.000

    0.0190.1130.0000.2890.5510.028

    Idh-2 ab

    0.9740.026

    0.9940.006

    Mdh-1 abc

    0.2000.0130.787

    0.0000.0110.989

    Me-1 ab

    0.9810.019

    0.9690.031

    6Pgd-1 abcd

    e

    0.0240.1070.8460.021

    0.002

    0.0000.0860.9090.000

    0.0056Pgd-2 a

    bcd

    0.1860.0690.6380.107

    0.0000.0630.9230.014

    Pgm-1 abcde

    0.1020.0800.6470.1550.016

    0.0000.0000.1150.8850.000

    3). The variations of those values within L. longiflorum pop-ulations, however, exhibited considerably wide ranges from23.1 to 76.9 for Pp, 1.31 to 2.15 for A, 2.00 to 3.33 for Ap,and 0.077 to 0.315 for h. Thus, the range of each population

    diversity parameter for L. formosanum overlapped with thatfor L. longiflorum. The most highly diverged populations werepresent in Okinawa and Ishigaki Jima. It was noticeable thatthe diversity values, conspicuously those of h, for L. longiflo-rum populations located on islands with relatively lower peakaltitudes (LKI, LOE, LYR, LMI, and LYO) and on the easternsatellite island of the mainland of Taiwan (LLA) were lowerthan those on their adjacent islands with higher peak altitudes.

    Genetic population structure and intraspecificdifferentiationFixation indices (Fis) varied greatly amongpopulations of each species, although no significant excess of

    heterozygotes was observed (Table 3). Fifty-five loci (44%out of 119 loci tested for L. longiflorum showed significandeviation from 0. Relatively high frequencies of the deviatedloci within a population occurred in LYA, LAM1, LAM2LOE, LYR, LOK2, and LOK3, which are located in the rel-atively northern part of the archipelago. For L. formosanumten loci (30%) out of 33 loci tested were significant.

    Chi-square analyses for heterogeneity indicated significan(P 0.01) allele frequency differences among populations inall and seven loci for L. longiflorum and L. formosanum, respectively (Table 4). On average, the indices of genetic dif-ferentiation (GST) were prominently different between the twospecies. The total gene diversity was moderately (35%) apportioned among populations of L. longiflorum, whereas themajority (92%) was apportioned within populations of L. formosanum.

    Neis (1978) unbiased genetic identity (I) and standard genetic distance (D) values within and between species are sum-marized in Table 5. The I values between populations within L. longiflorum ranged widely from 0.592 to 1.000 with themean of 0.850, whereas those within L. formosanum rangedmuch more narrowly from 0.946 to 0.997 with the mean of

    0.977.The high correlation between genetic and geographic dis

    tance among all populations (r 0.791; P 0.001) was detected. Thus, branches of a neighbor-joining tree were combined nearly in the geographic order, showing that the popu-lations of L. formosanum was clustered with southernmost Llongiflorum populations in Taiwan with the highest I value(0.978) between LFU and FSH (Fig. 2, Table 5). The neighbor- joining tree roughly generated four major clusters: (1) LYAand LKI, (2) LOK1, LAM1, LAM2, and LTO, (3) LOK2LOK3, LOE, LYR, LKU, LMI, LIS1, LIS2, LIR, and LYOand (4) the remainder.

    DISCUSSION

    Allozyme diversity and origin of the two speciesLiliumlongiflorumFrankham (1997) demonstrated that insular endemic species tend to have lower genetic variability than thecontinental taxa. DeJoode and Wendel (1992) summarized theallozyme variability of 55 insular endemic plant taxa, whichin general was seen to express relatively limited amounts ofvariability at the species or infraspecific taxon with Pp 25.0(0.057.0), A 1.32 (1.001.93), and h (HT) 0.064 (0.0000.195) as an average (range) across them. On the other handnotable exceptional cases indicating relatively high estimatedvalues were reported recently. For example, in HawaiianSchiedea and Alsinidendron, respective Pp, A, and h value(and ranges) averaged across 25 populations from 20 specieswere 43.1 (088.9), 1.80 (1.003.00), and 0.183 (00.371

    (Weller, Sakai, and Straub, 1996); in Hawaiian Metrosiderosthe latter two values (and ranges) averaged across 14 popu-lations from three species were 3.0 (2.73.3) and 0.371(0.2960.470), respectively (Aradhya, Mueller-Dombois, andRanker, 1991), and in endemics of the Canary Islands, the h(HT) value (and range) averaged across 69 species from 18genera was 0.186 (0.0000.456) (Francisco-Ortega et al.2000). Compared with the variability values of the reportedinsular taxa, those of L. longiflorum (Pp 100, A 3.46, andh 0.312 at the species level, and Pp 48.2, A 1.72, andh 0.187 at the population level) are comparable to higheror the highest ones.

  • 8/7/2019 1230===LILIUM LONGIFLORUM+

    5/10

    1234 [Vol. 88AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY

    TABLE 3. Genetic diversity estimates and fixation indices of Lilium longiflorum and L. formosanum at the population and species level based on13 loci examined. N mean sample size per locus, Pp percentage polymorphic loci at 95% criterion, A mean number of alleles per locus,

    Ap mean number of alleles per polymorphic locus, h mean expected heterozygosity (Neis [1978] unbiased estimate), Fis fixation index(unbiased estimate of Nei and Chesser [1983]). Results of tests for deviations from Hardy-Weinberg (H-W) equilibrium genotypic frequenciesare also shown (tested number of loci tested out of a total of 13, ns number of loci without significant [P 0.05] deficiency from H-Wequilibrium, number of loci with significant [P 0.05] deficiency of homozygotes).

    Population name N Pp A Ap h Fis

    H-W deviations

    Tested ns

    LYALKILAM1LAM2LTO

    29.842.522.826.839.5

    46.246.246.253.846.2

    1.461.621.621.851.77

    2.002.332.332.572.67

    0.2050.1590.1700.2210.152

    0.5710.1880.4650.4510.108

    66676

    04135

    62541

    LOELYRLOK1LOK2LOK3

    33.950.811.013.0

    9.9

    69.261.576.969.269.2

    1.852.001.922.151.85

    2.222.632.202.672.22

    0.1860.1970.2990.3150.284

    0.4730.3720.2910.6450.460

    98

    1099

    23824

    75275

    LKULMILIS1LIS2LIR

    42.928.354.453.036.8

    46.230.846.253.838.5

    1.771.382.082.001.69

    2.672.253.332.862.80

    0.2000.1600.2080.2040.162

    0.1190.0860.156

    0.0570.219

    64675

    44563

    20112

    LYOLPILFULLA

    40.536.928.830.0

    30.830.830.823.1

    1.381.461.541.31

    2.252.502.752.33

    0.1040.1340.1230.077

    0.0770.042

    0.0140.291

    4443

    3442

    1001

    Mean of L. longiflorumL. longiflorum at the species level

    33.3 48.2100.0

    1.723.46

    2.503.46

    0.1870.312

    FWUFLIFHOFWSFSHFTAFPAFCH

    21.017.933.020.012.033.040.622.0

    7.723.130.830.846.246.238.530.8

    1.081.231.461.381.541.771.541.46

    2.002.002.502.252.172.672.402.50

    0.0440.0710.1140.1490.1220.1700.1750.128

    0.9010.4830.3470.3310.0320.2280.0430.365

    13446654

    02136452

    11310202

    Mean of L. formosanumL. formosanum at the species level

    24.9 31.776.9

    1.432.46

    2.312.90

    0.1210.142

    TABLE 4. Gene diversity statistics (Nei and Chesser, 1983) for 13 iso-zyme loci in Lilium longiflorum and L. formasanum. HT totalgene diversity, HS gene diversity within population, GST pro-portion of the total gene diversity among populations.

    Locus

    L. longiflorum

    HT HS GSTa

    L. formosanum

    HT HS GSTa

    Aat-2Aat-3Cat-1

    Dia-1Fest-2Gdh-1Gpi-2

    0.1000.178

    0.0090.2740.6970.3900.623

    0.0340.107

    0.0080.2100.4360.2450.373

    0.662**0.397**

    0.039**0.233**0.374**0.370**0.402**

    0.0060.048

    0.0000.0800.6000.0210.489

    0.0060.047

    0.0000.0740.4450.0200.448

    0.0000.018

    0.0000.072**0.259**0.056**0.084**

    Idh-2Mdh-1Me-16Pgd-16Pgd-2Pgm-1Mean

    0.0500.3400.0380.2720.5430.5400.312

    0.0450.2030.0250.2200.2020.3340.188

    0.102**0.405**0.337**0.192**0.628**0.381**0.348

    0.0110.0210.0610.1670.1440.2040.142

    0.0110.0210.0480.1570.1160.1980.122

    0.0210.0130.206**0.060**0.199**0.0290.078

    a Chi-square analysis of heterogeneity of allelic frequency amongpopulations: ** P 0.01.

    The both species-level and population-level allozyme vari-ability of L. longiflorum exceeded that averaged across thespecies in various ecological categories, which mainly com-prised continental species, such as monocotyledonous species(Pp 59.2, A 2.38, and h 0.181 at the species level for111 species, and Pp 40.3, A 1.66, and h 0.144 at thepopulation level for 80 species), endemic species (Pp 40.0,A 1.80, and h 0.096 at the species level for 81 species,and Pp 26.3, A 1.39, and h 0.063 at the populationlevel for 100 species) and outcrossing animal-pollinated spe-cies (Pp 50.1, A 1.99, and h 0.167 at the species levelfor 172 species, and Pp 35.9, A 1.54, and h 0.124 at

    the population level for 164 species) (Hamrick and Godt,1990), though the wide range of variations was observedamong population-level values of L. longiflorum. Among Lil-iaceous species, the species-level allozyme variability in L.longiflorum is almost comparable to the highest one reportedin Hemerocallis hakuunensis (Pp 83.0, A 6.08, and h 0.279), which is native to the Korean Peninsula and a bulbousplant with similar life history to L. longiflorum (Kang andChung, 1997). Thus, L. longiflorum is a plant species withremarkably high allozyme variability.

    Comparison in genetic identity value (I) within a speciesalso revealed that L. longiflorum is highly diverged as a single

  • 8/7/2019 1230===LILIUM LONGIFLORUM+

    6/10

    July 2001] 1235HIRAMATSU ET AL.BIOGEOGRAPHY AND ORIGIN OF LILIUM

    TABLE 5. Summaries of Neis (1978) unbiased genetic identity (I) and standard genetic distance (D) within Lilium longiflorum and L. formosanum

    and between them.

    Species or pair of species

    I

    Mean Range

    D

    Mean Range

    Within speciesL. longiflorumL. formosanum

    0.8500.977

    0.5921.0000.9460.997

    0.1690.024

    0.0000.5240.0030.056

    Between speciesL. longiflorum vs. L. formosanum 0.816 0.6380.978 0.208 0.0220.450

    Fig. 2. Phenogram for 19 populations of Lilium longiflorum and eightpopulations of L. formosanum constructed using a neighbor-joining methodbased on Neis (1978) standard genetic distance. Abbreviations of populationnames are the same as those in Table 1.

    species (see Crawford, 1990, for a review). The minimum Ivalue between populations within L. longiflorum (0.592),which was recorded between northernmost (LYA) and south-ernmost (LLA) populations, has rarely been reported withinthe flowering plant. For example, extensive minimum Ivalueshave been reported within a selfing insular species, Bidensdiscoidea (0.688; Roberts, 1983), in Limnanthes floccosa(0.575; McNeill and Jain, 1983), and between subspecies pairsof Lens culinaris (0.65; Pinkas, Zamir, and Ladizinsky, 1985).

    Generally, among insular plants, lower minimum I valueshave been rarely recorded in very limited congeneric orintergeneric population pairs in a large complex of mor-phologically and ecologically highly radiating taxa; e.g., Al-sinoideae in Hawaii (0.242; Weller, Sakai, and Straub, 1996),silversword alliance in Hawaii (0.426; Witter and Carr, 1988),woody Sonchus alliance in the Canary Islands (0.490; Kim etal., 1999), and Robinsonia in the Juan Fernandez Islands(0.560; Crawford et al., 1992). Unlike morphological and eco-logical phenotypes, protein molecules such as allozymes areassumed to evolve much more consistently because of theirneutral relationship to natural selection, as described by theneutral theory of molecular evolution (Kimura, 1983). The factthat the amount of allozyme divergence in L. longiflorum isclose to that in the maximally radiating insular plant taxa in-

    dicates that they originated, roughly, at the same time. Nev-ertheless, they show a great contrast in terms of phenotypicdivergence.

    A large number of reports for insular plants have been con-cerned with the highly radiating taxa in their morphologicaland ecological phenotypes in combination with very little mo-lecular divergence (see Crawford, 1989, 1990; Gemmill et al.,1998; Ito, 1998, for reviews). The opposite pattern, in which

    genetically highly diverged insular taxa showed little divergence in their morphological and ecological phenotypes, wasrarely observed until the present study on L. longiflorum. Although it may be difficult to conclude the reason why suchcontrasting evolution occurs under insular environments, icould be attributed to differences in the environmental andecological properties of oceanic and continental islands. Di-verse ecologically unoccupied niches, which is presumably amajor factor affecting radiating evolution, are expected to berather few and small even at the birth of continental islandssuch as the Ryukyu Archipelago and Taiwan.

    Nei (1987) demonstrated a method for estimating divergence time based on allozyme data, given certain assumptionabout mutation rates and the operation of a molecular clocktime (t) D/2a, where D is the standard genetic distance anda is the substitution rate per locus per year. Usually, a is assumed to be 107 per locus per year. Then, t may be calculated as (5 106)D. Using this formula, the initiation ofdivergence has been estimated in the aforementioned highlyradiating insular taxa, e.g., 3.6 106 yr ago (MYA) for thewoody Sonchus alliance in the Canary Islands (Kim et al.1999) and 2.9 MYA for Robinsonia spp. in the Juan FernandezIslands (Crawford et al., 1992). Since the maximum D within L. longiflorum was 0.524, initiation of divergence is assumed

    to be 2.62 MYA. As pointed out by Nei (1987), however, thisvalue may sometimes be an overestimate because the geneticdistance tends to increase when the population experiencebottlenecks. This is likely to occur under insular environ-ments and for colonizing plants like L. longiflorum.

    From the geological point of view, Kimura (1996) describedthat at the end of the Tertiary Period (1.72.0 MYA), the areaaround Ryukyu and Taiwan was a continuous coastal marginin East Asia. The archipelago had developed during the Pleis-tocene Era. It is, therefore, realistic to presume that L. longiflorum existed as early as around at the end of the TertiaryPeriod, and then experienced the Quaternary dynamics thagenerated the current Ryukyu to Taiwan arc. The extremelyhigh allozyme variability and divergence in L. longiflorum presumably reflect the relict endemism with the relatively long-

    time persistence of the present distribution in this species.

    Lilium formosanumLilium formosanum possessed a subseof L. longiflorum alleles for 11 (85%) loci and exhibited lessallozyme variability than L. longiflorum (76.9 vs. 100 for P2.46 vs. 3.46 for A, and 0.142 vs. 0.312 for h at the specielevel). These facts agree with previous data describing progenitor-derivative species pairs (e.g., Gottlieb, 1973, 1974Crawford, Ornduff, and Vasey, 1985; Rieseberg et al., 1987Loveless and Hamrick, 1988; Pleasants and Wendel, 1989Maki et al., 1999). The three species-specific alleles (Fest-2bFest-2f, and Gpi-2e) were detected for L. formosanum. How

  • 8/7/2019 1230===LILIUM LONGIFLORUM+

    7/10

    1236 [Vol. 88AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY

    ever, such numbers of unique alleles are not uncommon inrecently derived species (08 in the 11 species; see Pleasantsand Wendel, 1989). The mean I value of population pairs be-tween L. formosanum and L. longiflorum (0.816) is close tothe lowest values among those 11 progenitor-derivative speciespairs listed by Pleasants and Wendel (1989). This result canbe undoubtedly attributed to the unusually extreme genetic dif-

    ferentiation within a progenitor species, L. longiflorum. Re-stricted among populations within the mainland of Taiwan,where the speciation between the two species presumably oc-curred, estimation of the mean I between L. formosanum and L. longiflorum was 0.954 (0.9250.978). This indicates thatthe two species are genetically very close in the manner typicalof progenitor-derivative species pairs. Selfing is considered akey characteristic necessary for the rapid expansion of a spe-cies (Maki et al., 1999), and the occurrence of selfing naturesshown by several recently derivative species such as Stephan-omeria malheurensis (Gottlieb, 1973), Polygonella articulata,P. americana (Lewis and Crawford, 1995), and Tricyrtis nana(Maki et al., 1999) are very similar to the case of derivationof self-compatible L. formosanum from self-incompatible L.longiflorum. The accumulated evidence above demonstratesthat L. formosanum could be a recent local derivative from thesouthern peripheral populations of L. longiflorum.

    Naturalized populations ofL. formosanum are found in veg-etation dominated by relatively tall grasses with wide geo-graphical ranges in often-disturbed inland areas of the main-lands of Japan, and sometimes they comprised thousands ofindividuals (M. Hiramatsu, personal observation). In contrast, L. longiflorum populations are never seen in such contexts. InSouth Africa, L. formosanum is widely naturalized under veg-etation similar to that found in the mainlands of Japan (Wal-ters, 1983). These facts imply that unlike L. longiflorum, L.formosanum can be distributed rapidly and widely in adaptablecompetitive and disturbed environments. Similar adaptable en-vironments develop in adjacent regions such as the Ryukyu

    Archipelago and the Chinese continent. Nevertheless, nativepopulations of L. formosanum persist solely within the main-land of Taiwan. Thus, it is assumed that L. formosanum hasbeen prevented from migrating to adjacent regions because ofits isolation on the mainland of Taiwan prior to species initi-ation. The isolation of the mainland of Taiwan is assumed tohave occurred during the late stage of the archipelagos de-velopment as early as the last glaciation at the end of thePleistocene Era (Kimura, 1996). Examples of recent derivativespecies whose initiation times are assumed to be around thePleistocene glaciation include Cirsium pitcheri (Loveless andHamrick, 1988) , Erythronium propullans (Pleasants and Wen-del, 1989) , Polygonella articulata, and P. americana (Lewisand Crawford, 1995).

    The progenitor and derivative relationship between L. lon-giflorum and L. formosanum based on our results contradictsthe speculation made by Dubouzet and Shinoda (1999), whodemonstrated only a sister relationship between the two spe-cies based on the internal transcribed spacer sequences of thespecies nrDNA and regarded L. longiflorum as a species de-rived from L. formosanum. Since our results demonstrate thatL. longiflorum is highly diverged as a single species, the ac-curacy of resolution for the two species phylogenetic rela-tionships will depend on the sample size used in the study.Thus, the very small number of samples (presumably one foreach species) in the study by Dubouzet and Shinoda (1999) is

    assumed to be a cause of their inaccurate determination of thephylogenetic relationship between the two species.

    The biogeographic structure of L. longiflorum involvinginsular historical eventsDetailed comparisons of allozymediversity among L. longiflorum populations revealed biogeo-graphic structures highly associated with the historical geog-

    raphy of the Ryukyu to Taiwan archipelago arc, which hasbeen assumed based on geology and the biogeography of otherorganisms.

    First, the depauperization in allozyme variability for somepopulations closely correlated with the maximum altitude oftheir islands, i.e., the populations that did not exhibit as muchallozyme variability as did the adjacent island populations,LKI, LOE, LYR, LMI, and LYO, were located on islands low-er than 231 m (Tables 1, 3). Because the sea level was at onetime 200 m higher than that at present, lower islands weresubmerged largely or completely and then pushed upward dur-ing the late Pleistocene Era (0.41.0 MYA) (Kimura, 1996).This evidence suggests that those L. longiflorum populationshad recently experienced very severe bottlenecks either by di-minishing population size or by subsequent migration from

    relict populations on adjacent islands not highly submergedand with higher altitudes. Similarly, another substantially ge-netically eroded population on the small but high volcanic is-land southeast of the mainland of Taiwan (LLA) seems to havealso experienced severe bottlenecks, although the initiatingtime of this island is not known. A similar geohistory-asso-ciated biogeographic hypothesis regarding this archipelago hasbeen proposed to explain the mosaic distribution pattern of pitvipers (Trimeresurus spp.), whether they are present or absentin each island (Takara, 1962). However, no evidence has beenbased on population genetic diversity until the present study.

    Secondly, by excluding the islands with genetically erodedpopulations (LKI, LOE, LYR, LMI, LYO, and LLA), threemajor vicariant splits generating large genetic differentiation

    on the neighbor-joining tree correspond to interisland splitsbetween Yaku Shima and Amami O Shima, between TokunoShima and Okinawa, and between Iriomote Jima and the main-land of Taiwan, though a northernmost population in Okinawa(LOK1) is included as an exception in the geographically dif-ferent cluster group over the splits (Figs. 1 and 2). The north-ernmost split has long been recognized as the first straitformed in the archipelago land bridge (Kizaki and Oshiro,1977; Kimura, 1996) and as a vicariant border called WatasesLine (Kuroda, 1931; Hotta, 1974; Ono, 1989), since it corre-sponds to distribution borders dividing Japanese biota (Kuro-da, 1931; Inger, 1950; Hotta, 1974; Ono, 1989; Ota, 1998) andto the Tokara Tectonic Strait (Kimura, 1996). Thus, due to thepersistence of such an old strait, the population of L. longiflo-rum on Yaku Shima (LYA) seems to have been isolated from

    the other southern populations for a long time. Whereas thevicariant border between Tokuno Shima and Okinawa hadscarcely been recognized based on the distribution patterns oforganisms until the accumulation of recent molecular data re-garding such species as Japanese newts, Cynops ensicauda(Hayashi and Matsui, 1988), semi-aquatic annual ferns, Cer-atopteris thalictroides (Watano and Masuyama, 1994), wood-feeding cockroaches, Salganea taiwanensis (Maekawa et al.,1999), and pit vipers, Trimeresurus flavoviridis (Toda et al.,1999) exhibits considerable genetic differentiation betweenOkinawa and Tokuno Shima. Our results together with thoseregarding other organisms may suggest the possibility that an-

  • 8/7/2019 1230===LILIUM LONGIFLORUM+

    8/10

    July 2001] 1237HIRAMATSU ET AL.BIOGEOGRAPHY AND ORIGIN OF LILIUM

    other noticeable vicariant border limiting gene flow has longpersisted between Okinawa and Tokuno Shima. At present, wedo not know why the remaining major vicariant split existsbetween Iriomote Jima and the mainland of Taiwan, only thatthe separation of this region is assumed to have originatedduring a relatively late stage of the archipelagos development(Kimura, 1996).

    Population structure with respect to its relation to reproductive and breeding system, and geographicdistribution of the two speciesIn general, the breeding sys-tem of flowering plant species greatly affects their GST values,e.g., outcrossed and mixed animal-pollinated species have 39and 42% GST values of selfing species, respectively (Hamrickand Godt, 1990). Most Lilium species including L. longiflorumsecrete nectaries to attract pollinating insects (McRae, 1998;M. Hiramatsu, personal observation), and L. longiflorum isgenerally regarded as self-incompatible (Miller, 1993). Thesefacts imply that L. longiflorum is an obligate outcrossed, in-sect-pollinated species. Nevertheless, the GST value of L. lon-giflorum (0.348) was 77% higher than that of the mean across124 outcrossed, animal-pollinated species (0.197) and 61%

    higher across 60 mixed, animal-pollinated species (0.216)(Hamrick and Godt, 1990). This shows conspicuously limitedgene flow between L. longiflorum populations. The distribu-tion of L. longiflorum ranges 1300 km between its northern-most and southernmost populations, but is disconnected in themanner of steppingstones (Fig. 1). Since the 19 populationstreated in the present study are located widely across 14 dif-ferent islands, it is highly unlikely that pollen transfer by in-sects and seed dispersal across the sea occurs for these pop-ulations.

    The frequent occurrence of the loci with significant excessesof homozygous genotypes in some northern populations fromOkinawa (LYA, LAM1, LAM2, LOE, LYR, LOK2, andLOK3) is also an unexpected result, because L. longiflorum is

    a putative self-incompatible, outcrossed species. Because ofthe lack of additional evidence, this result is difficult to inter-pret. For the moment, it could only be said that this is eitherbecause of the random drift of a small specimen as seen inOkinawa (LOK2 and LOK3), the relatively restricted geneflow of the metapopulation structure within a large population,or possibly the lack of random mating within a population,namely, the selfing of self-compatible individuals.

    Likewise, the frequency of loci deviating significantly to-ward an excess of homozygotes varied between populationswithin L. formosanum and tended to be high in populationswith relatively low percentages of polymorphic loci (Table 3). Lilium formosanum is generally recognized as self-compatible(Shii, 1983; M. Hiramatsu, unpublished data). These facts thusindicate that facultative breeding occurs in L. formosanum, i.e.,

    within some populations, outcrossing dominates, while selfingdominates within others. Selfing must play an important role,particularly in rapidly establishing new colonies from only sin-gle introductions, as described by Bakers law (Baker, 1955,1967; Stebbins, 1957).

    The GST value of L. formosanum (0.078) was 60% smallerthan the mean of 124 outcrossed, animal-pollinated speciesand 64% smaller than the mean of 60 mixed, animal-pollinatedspecies (Hamrick and Godt, 1990). This shows frequent geneflow between populations. Unlike in L. longiflorum, L. for-mosanum populations are distributed solely on the mainlandof Taiwan. Further, L. formosanum produces thinner seeds with

    a wider winged margin than those of L. longiflorum and hasan advantage in natural seed dispersal by wind (Shii, 1983McRae, 1998). Gene flow between the populations of the spe-cies, therefore, seems to be maintained by frequently repeatedpollen flow by insects and seed dispersal by wind or humanactivities within Taiwan without a major restriction by the sea

    Conservational aspectsWe are confident that natural populations of L. longiflorum and L. formosanum are graduallydiminishing because of such human activities as robbery forhorticultural purposes and developmental destruction on islands, even though they are exempted from inclusion in thered data book at present. From the viewpoint of conservationbiology, our present study is quite educational; the diminishment of natural populations and genetic assimilation causedby reckless human activities will eventually erase the naturalhistory written within the genes of these attractive lilies.

    LITERATURE CITED

    ADSERSEN, H. 1995. Research on islands: classic, recent, and prospectivapproaches. In P. M. Vitousek, L. L. Loope, and H. Adsersen [eds.]

    Islands: biological diversity and ecosystem function, 721. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.

    AFFRE, L., J. D. THOMPSON, AND M. DEBUSSCHE. 1997. Genetic structure ocontinental and island populations of the Mediterranean endemic Cyclamen balearicum (Primulaceae). American Journal of Botany 84: 437451.

    ARADHYA, K. M., D. MUELLER-DOMBOIS, AND T. A. RANKER. 1991. Genetievidence for recent and incipient speciation in the evolution of Hawaiian

    Metrosideros (Myrtaceae). Heredity 67: 129138.BAKER, H. G. 1955. Self-incompatibility and establishment after long dis

    tance dispersal. Evolution 9: 347349.. 1967. Support for Bakers Law as a rule. Evolution 21: 853856.BALDWIN, B. G., D. J. CRAWFORD, J. FRANCISCO-ORTEGA, S. C. KIM, T

    SANG, AND T. F. STUESSY. 1999. Molecular phylogenetic insights on thorigin and evolution of oceanic island plants. In P. M. Hollingsworth, RM. Bateman, and R. J. Gornall [eds.], Molecular systematics and planevolution, 400441. Taylor and Francis, London, UK.

    COMBER, H. F. 1949. A new classification of the genus Lilium. Lily YearbookRoyal Horticultural Society 13: 85105.

    CRAWFORD, D. J. 1989. Enzyme electrophoresis and plant systematics. In DE. Soltis and P. S. Soltis [eds.], Isozymes in plant biology, 146164Dioscorides Press, Portland, Oregon, USA.

    . 1990. Plant molecular systematics: macromolecular approachesJohn Wiley, New York, New York, USA.

    , R. ORNDUFF, AND M. C. VASEY. 1985. Allozyme variation withinand between Lasthenia minor and its derivative species L. maritima (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 72: 11771184.

    , T. F. STUESSY, D. W. HAINES, M. B. COSNER, M. SILVA, AND PLOPEZ. 1992. Allozyme diversity within and divergence among four species of Robinsonia (Asteraceae: Senecioneae), a genus endemic to theJuan Fernandez Islands, Chile. American Journal of Botany 79: 962966.

    DEJOODE, D. R., AND J. F. WENDEL. 1992. Genetic diversity and origin othe Hawaiian Islands cotton, Gossypium tomentosum. American Journa

    of Botany 79: 13111319.DUBOUZET, J. G., AND K. SHINODA. 1999. Phylogenetic analysis of the in

    ternal transcribed spacer region of Japanese Lilium species. Theoreticaand Applied Genetics 98: 954960.

    FELSENSTEIN, J. 1993. PHYLIP (phylogeny inference package) version 3.5cDistributed by author. Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

    FRANCISCO-ORTEGA, J., A. SANTOS-GUERRA, S.-C. KIM, AND D. J. CRAWFORD. 2000. Plant genetic diversity in the Canary Islands: a conservationperspective. American Journal of Botany 87: 909919.

    FRANKHAM, R. 1997. Do island population have less genetic variation thanmainland populations? Heredity 78: 311327.

    GEMMILL, C. E. C., T. A. RANKER, D. RAGONE, S. P. PERLMAN, AND K. RWOOD. 1998. Conservation genetics of the endangered endemic Hawai

  • 8/7/2019 1230===LILIUM LONGIFLORUM+

    9/10

    1238 [Vol. 88AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY

    ian genus Brighamia (Campanulaceae). American Journal of Botany 85:528539.

    GOTTLIEB, L. D. 1973. Genetic differentiation, sympatric speciation, and theorigin of a diploid species of Stephanomeria. American Journal of Bot-any 60: 545533.

    . 1974. Genetic confirmation of the origin ofClarkia lingulata. Evo-lution 28: 244250.

    HAMRICK, J. L., AND M. J. GODT. 1990. Allozyme diversity in plant species.

    In A. H. D. Brown, M. T. Clegg, A. L. Kahler, and B. S. Weir [eds.],Plant population genetics, breeding, and genetic resources, 4363. Sin-

    auer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.

    HARTL, D. L. 1981. A primer of population genetics. Sinauer, Sunderland,

    Massachusetts, USA.HAYASHI, T., AND M. M ATSUI. 1988. Biochemical differentiation in Japanese

    newts, genus Cynops (Salamandridae). Zoological Science 5: 11211136.

    HOTTA, M. 1974. Evolutionary biology in plants. III. History and geography

    of plants (in Japanese). Sanseido Co., Tokyo, Japan.

    INGER, R. F. 1950. Distribution and speciation of the amphibians of the Ryu-kyu Islands. American Naturalist 84: 95115.

    INOUE, K., AND T. KAWAHARA. 1990. Allozyme differentiation and genetic

    structure in island and mainland Japanese populations of Campanula

    punctata (Campanulaceae). American Journal of Botany 77: 14401448.

    ITO, M. 1998. Origin and evolution of endemic plants of the Bonin (Ogasa-wara) Islands. Researches on Population Ecology 40: 205212.

    KANG, S. S., AND M. G. CHUNG. 1997. Genetic variation and population

    structure in Korean endemic species: IV. Hemerocallis hakuunensis (Lil-iaceae). Journal of Plant Research 110: 209217.

    KIM, S. C., D. J. CRAWFORD, J. FRANCISCO-ORTEGA, AND A. SANTOS-GUER-

    RA. 1996. A common origin for woody Sonchus and five related genera

    in the Macronesian Islands: molecular evidence for extensive radiation.

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 93: 77437748.

    , , , AND . 1999. Adaptive radiation and geneticdifferentiation in the woody Sonchus alliance (Asteraceae: Sonchinae) in

    the Canary Islands. Plant Systematics and Evolution 215: 101118.

    KIMURA, M. 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge

    University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    KIMURA, M. 1996. Quaternary paleogeography of the Ryukyu Arc. Journal

    of Geography 105: 259285 (in Japanese with English abstract).

    KIZAKI, K., AND I. OSHIRO. 1977. Paleogeography of the Rytkyu [sic] Islands.

    Marine Science Monthly 9: 543549 (in Japanese with English abstract).

    KURODA, N. 1931. Evaluation of the Watases line from the view point of

    vertebrate distribution. Zoological Magazine 43: 172175 (in Japanese).LEWIS, P. O., AND D. J. CRAWFORD. 1995. Pleistocene refugium endemics

    exhibit greater allozyme diversity than widespread congeners in the ge-

    nus Polygonella (Polygonaceae). American Journal of Botany 82: 141

    149.

    LI, C. C., AND D. G. HORVITZ. 1953. Some methods of estimating the in-breeding coefficient. American Journal of Human Genetics 5: 107117.

    LOVELESS, M. D., AND J. L. HAMRICK. 1988. Genetic organization and evo-

    lution history in two North American species of Cirsium. Evolution 42:

    254265.

    MAEKAWA, K., N. LO, O. KITADE, T. MIURA, AND T. MASUMOTO. 1999.Molecular phylogeny and geographic distribution of wood-feeding cock-

    roaches in Eastern Asian islands. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

    13: 360376.

    MAKI, M., H. MORITA, S. OIKI, AND H. TAKAHASHI. 1999. The effect of

    geographic range and dichogamy on genetic variability and populationgenetic structure in Tricyrtis section Flavae (Liliaceae). American Jour-

    nal of Botany 86: 287292.MASUDA, R., AND M. C. YOSHIDA. 1995. Two Japanese wildcats, the Tushima

    cat and Iriomote cat, show the same mitochondrial lineage as the leopard

    cat Felis bengalenses. Zoological Science 12: 655659.MCNEILL, C. I., AND S. K. JAIN. 1983. Genetic differentiation studies and

    phylogenetic inference in the plant genus Limnanthes (section Inflexae).

    Theoretical and Applied Genetics 66: 257269.

    MCRAE, E. A. 1998. Liliesa guide for growers and collectors. Timber

    Press, Portland, Oregon, USA.MILLER, W. B. 1993. Lilium longiflorum. In A. De Hertogh and M. Le Nard

    [eds.], The physiology of flower bulbs, 391422. Elsevier, Amsterdam,

    The Netherlands.

    NEI, M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Pro-

    ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 70: 33213323.

    . 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance

    from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583590.

    . 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press,

    New York, New York, USA.

    , AND R. K. CHESSER. 1983. Estimation of fixation indices and gene

    diversities. Annals of Human Genetics 47: 253259.

    , AND A. K. ROYCHOUDHURY. 1974. Sampling variances of hetero-

    zygosity and genetic distance. Genetics 76: 379390.

    NISHIDA, M. 1985. Substantial genetic differentiation in Ayu Plecoglossusaltivelis of the Japan and Ryukyu Islands. Bulletin of the Japanese So-

    ciety of Scientific Fisheries 51: 12691274.

    OKAZAKI, K. 1996. Lilium species native to Japan, and breeding and pro-

    duction of Lilium in Japan. Acta Horticulturae 414: 8192.

    ONO, M. 1989. Phytogeography in Ogasawara and Ryukyu (Nansei) Islands

    (in Japanese). In A. Miyawaki [ed.], Vegetation of Japan, vol. 10, Oki-

    nawa and Ogasawara, 127137. Shibundo Co., Tokyo, Japan.

    OTA, H. 1998. Geographic patterns of endemism and speciation in amphib-

    ians and reptiles of the Ryukyu Archipelago, Japan, with special refer-

    ence to their paleogeographical implications. Researches on Population

    Ecology 40: 189204.

    PINKAS, R., D. ZAMIR, AND G. LADIZINSKY. 1985. Allozyme divergence and

    evolution in the genus Lens. Plant Systematics and Evolution 151: 131

    140.

    PLEASANTS, J. M., AND J. F. WENDEL. 1989. Genetic diversity in a clonal

    narrow endemic, Erythronium propullans, and in its widespread progen-

    itor, Erythronium albidum. American Journal of Botany 76: 11361151.

    RIESEBERG, L. H., P. M. PETERSON, D. E. SOLTIS, AND C. R. ANNABLE. 1987.

    Genetic divergence and isozyme variation among four varieties ofAllium

    douglasii (Alliaceae). American Journal of Botany 74: 16141624.

    ROBERTS, M. L. 1983. Allozyme diversity in Bidens discoidea (Compositae).

    Brittonia 35: 239247.

    SAITOU, N., AND M. NEI. 1987. The neighbor joining method: a new method

    for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution

    4: 406425.

    SHII, C. T. 1983. The distribution and variation of Lilium formosanum Wall.

    and L. longiflorum Thunb. in Taiwan. Lily Year Book of the North Amer-

    ican Lily Society 36: 4851.

    SHIMIZU, M. 1987. Lilium species, subspecies, and cultivars (in Japanese). In

    M. Shimizu [ed.], The lilies of Japanspecies and hybrids, 4797. Sei-

    bundoshinkosha Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.

    SOLTIS, D. E., C. H. HAUFLER, D. C. DARROW, AND G. J. GASTONY. 1983.

    Starch gel electrophoresis of ferns: a compilation of grinding buffers, geland electrode buffers, and staining schedules. American Fern Journal

    73: 927.

    STEBBINS, G. L. 1957. Self fertilization and population variability in the high-

    er plants. American Naturalist 9: 337354.

    TAKARA, T. 1962. Studies on the terrestrial snakes in the Ryukyu Archipel-

    ago. Science Bulletin of Agriculture and Home Economy Division, Uni-

    versity of the Ryukyus 9: 1102 (in Japanese with English abstract).

    TODA, M. 1999. Historical biogeography of East Asian populations of Rana

    limnocharis (Amphibia: Anura): a review. In H. Ota [ed.], Tropical island

    herpetofauna: origin, current diversity, and conservation, 299315. El-

    sevier Science B. V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    , T. HIKIDA, AND H. OTA. 1997. Genetic variation among insular pop-

    ulations of Gekko hokouensis (Reptilia: Squamata) near the northeastern

    borders of the Oriental and Palearctic zoogeographic regions in the north-

    ern Ryukyus, Japan. Zoological Science 14: 859867.

    , M. NISHIDA, M.-C. TU, T. HIKIDA, AND H. OTA. 1999. Genetic

    variation, phylogeny and biogeography of the pit vipers of the genus

    Trimeresurus sensu lato (Reptilia: Viperidae) in the subtropical East

    Asian islands. In H. Ota [ed.], Tropical island herpetofauna: origin, cur-

    rent diversity, and conservation, 249270. Elsevier Science B. V., Am-

    sterdam, The Netherlands.

    WALTERS, G. 1983. Naturalization of Lilium formosanum in South Africa.

    Lily Year Book of the North American Lily Society 36: 4447.

    WATANO, Y., AND S. MASUYAMA. 1994. Genetic differentiation in popula-

    tions of the polymorphic fern Ceratopteris thalictroides in Japan. Journal

    of Plant Research 107: 139146.

    WELLER, S. G., A. K. SAKAI, AND C. S TRAUB. 1996. Allozyme diversity and

    genetic identity in Schiedea and Alsinidendron (Caryophyllaceae: Alsi-

    noideae) in the Hawaiian Islands. Evolution 50: 2334.

  • 8/7/2019 1230===LILIUM LONGIFLORUM+

    10/10

    July 2001] 1239HIRAMATSU ET AL.BIOGEOGRAPHY AND ORIGIN OF LILIUM

    WENDEL, J. F., AND N. F. WEEDEN. 1989. Visualization and interpretation ofplant isozymes. In D. E. Soltis and P. S. Soltis [eds.], Isozymes in plantbiology, 545. Dioscorides Press, Portland, Oregon, USA.

    WESTERBERG, A., AND A. SAURA. 1994. Genetic differentiation in endemicSilene (Caryophyllaceae) on the Hawaiian Islands. American Journal of

    Botany 81: 14871493.WILSON, E. H. 1925. The lilies of eastern Asia. Dulau and Company, London,

    UK.WITTER, M. S., AND G. D. CARR. 1988. Adaptive radiation and genetic dif-

    ferentiation in the Hawaiian silversword alliance (Compositae: Madiinae). Evolution 42: 12781287.

    WORKMAN, P. L., AND J. D. NISWANDER. 1970. Population studies on southwestern Indian tribes. II. Local genetic differentiation in the Papago

    American Journal of Human Genetics 22: 2449.WRIGHT, S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97159. 1943. Isolation by distance. Genetics 28: 114138.. 1951. The genetical structure of populations. Annals of Eugenic

    15: 323354.