10. UNIVERSITY REGION...I-69 WB, Mile Marker 101 Shiawassee County West bound on I-69, 3 miles east...
14
MDOT Phase II SWMP Page 10-1 April 2005 10. UNIVERSITY REGION This chapter represents the activities to be performed by the MDOT University Region in fulfillment of the Permit requirements. Each region has its own chapter within this Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) containing the required activities it will perform as described in the SWMP Activities (Section 3.7). Included in this chapter is an outline of the proposed procedures described in the activities that will be incorporated into MDOT roadway projects, a map of the University Region facilities (Figure 10-1), contact and address information (Table 10-1), a table containing the activities the University Region will implement (Table 10-2), and the Phase II IDEP Investigation Maps for the University Region (Figures 10-2 through 10-8). Each SWMP activity is represented in Table 10-2 with a checkmark next to the applicable activities. Each activity is also indicated as a statewide or an urbanized area requirement per the Permit. The facility map is included to indicate locations where pollution prevention measures are taken. Contact information is provided on the MDOT employees in managerial positions for each Region/Transportation Service Center (TSC). The Phase II IDEP Investigation Maps were developed as part of the Illicit Discharge Elimination Program (IDEP). The maps indicate MDOT roadways that cross impaired waterbodies within urbanized areas. Impaired waterbodies refer to those waterbodies listed on the MDEQ 2004 305(b) and 303(d) Impaired Waterbodies List. Additionally, a CD-ROM containing outfall maps representing the location of each outfall investigated during the Phase I program is available upon request from MDOT. During the NPDES Phase I storm water program, approximately 366 outfalls were investigated throughout the six permitted cities as part of the IDEP. The six permitted cities included Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids, Flint, Sterling Heights, Warren and Livonia, with Ann Arbor being the only permitted city within the University Region. MDOT conducted 45 outfall investigations within the City of Ann Arbor. The following outline of proposed SWMP procedures shows the order in which individual activities, as described in Chapter 3, are followed within the scope of a typical MDOT roadway project. Once these procedures are developed, they will be incorporated into MDOT projects on a case-by-case basis depending on the scope and needs of the project. 1. Early coordination with MDEQ or other regulatory agencies will be sought during the initial design of selected projects (MDEQ Early Coordination Workgroup and Activity C- 4). 2. Consideration will be given to transportation-related areas of concern as identified by Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) with storm water quality control programs. Best management practices (BMPs) to address areas of concern will be incorporated into MDOT roadway projects to the maximum extent practicable (MEP) (Activity C-2). 3. Permanent BMPs (post-construction) will be selected based on MDOT BMP selection criteria (Activities C-3 and C-6) with consideration given to MDEQ or other regulatory
Transcript of 10. UNIVERSITY REGION...I-69 WB, Mile Marker 101 Shiawassee County West bound on I-69, 3 miles east...
MDOT Phase II SWMP Page 10-1 April 2005
10. UNIVERSITY REGION This chapter represents the activities to be performed by the MDOT University Region in fulfillment of the Permit requirements. Each region has its own chapter within this Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) containing the required activities it will perform as described in the SWMP Activities (Section 3.7). Included in this chapter is an outline of the proposed procedures described in the activities that will be incorporated into MDOT roadway projects, a map of the University Region facilities (Figure 10-1), contact and address information (Table 10-1), a table containing the activities the University Region will implement (Table 10-2), and the Phase II IDEP Investigation Maps for the University Region (Figures 10-2 through 10-8). Each SWMP activity is represented in Table 10-2 with a checkmark next to the applicable activities. Each activity is also indicated as a statewide or an urbanized area requirement per the Permit. The facility map is included to indicate locations where pollution prevention measures are taken. Contact information is provided on the MDOT employees in managerial positions for each Region/Transportation Service Center (TSC). The Phase II IDEP Investigation Maps were developed as part of the Illicit Discharge Elimination Program (IDEP). The maps indicate MDOT roadways that cross impaired waterbodies within urbanized areas. Impaired waterbodies refer to those waterbodies listed on the MDEQ 2004 305(b) and 303(d) Impaired Waterbodies List. Additionally, a CD-ROM containing outfall maps representing the location of each outfall investigated during the Phase I program is available upon request from MDOT. During the NPDES Phase I storm water program, approximately 366 outfalls were investigated throughout the six permitted cities as part of the IDEP. The six permitted cities included Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids, Flint, Sterling Heights, Warren and Livonia, with Ann Arbor being the only permitted city within the University Region. MDOT conducted 45 outfall investigations within the City of Ann Arbor. The following outline of proposed SWMP procedures shows the order in which individual activities, as described in Chapter 3, are followed within the scope of a typical MDOT roadway project. Once these procedures are developed, they will be incorporated into MDOT projects on a case-by-case basis depending on the scope and needs of the project.
1. Early coordination with MDEQ or other regulatory agencies will be sought during the initial design of selected projects (MDEQ Early Coordination Workgroup and Activity C-4).
2. Consideration will be given to transportation-related areas of concern as identified by Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) with storm water quality control programs. Best management practices (BMPs) to address areas of concern will be incorporated into MDOT roadway projects to the maximum extent practicable (MEP) (Activity C-2).
3. Permanent BMPs (post-construction) will be selected based on MDOT BMP selection criteria (Activities C-3 and C-6) with consideration given to MDEQ or other regulatory
MDOT Phase II SWMP Page 10-2 April 2005
agency input (Activity C-4) to the MEP. BMP selection will also be based on approved BMPs in the MDOT Drainage Manual and any Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements (BMP Design and Maintenance Workgroup) (Activity C-5).
4. Maintenance requirements will be developed for new permanent BMPs (BMP Design and Maintenance Workgroup and Activity C-1).
5. Permanent BMPs will be properly installed and maintained following BMP selection (Activities C-6 and C-1).
6. Construction activities will be conducted under MDOT’s approved Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control (SESC) Plan and the State of Michigan’s Permit by Rule.
7. The outfall labeling procedure will be implemented if new outfalls are planned. The consultant conducting outfall mapping will be notified that new outfalls are in place (Outfall Labeling Workgroup and Activity C-10).
8. Newly discovered outfalls will be identified and mapped (Outfall Mapping Workgroup and Activity I-5).
9. New flow control structures in urbanized areas will be reviewed and assessed for water quality benefits gained based on calculated pollutant removal rates (Activity C-11).
10. SWMP activities will be tracked and documented (Activity A-1). Examples include tracking the number of outfalls labeled and tracking maintenance activities through the Maintenance Activity Reporting System (MARS) (Program Assessment and Reporting Workgroup).
For specific roadway projects scheduled to be completed in the University Region, refer to MDOT’s 2005-2009 Five Year Transportation Program. The 2005-2009 Five Year Transportation Program is a report highlighting Michigan’s plan for preserving and improving its transportation network. The report describes the planned projects for each MDOT region. A link to the report is available on the MDOT Storm Water Management Web site. The 2005-2009 Five Year Transportation Program is currently underway and will limit the ability to implement new procedures not yet adopted by MDOT. Therefore, new procedures will be incorporated as they are adopted.
MDOT Phase II SWMP Page 10-3 April 2005
Figure 10-1 University Region Facilities Map
���������
������
�����
��� ���
�� ��
�������
������� ��
�����
���� ��
���������
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
�
��
��
��
�
���
�
��
��
�
��
���
����
��
��
��
��
�
��
��
�
��
����
��
��
����
�� ����
���
���
���
���
���
���
�
�
��
��
���
���
���
���
���
��
����
��
��
��
��
��
����
��
��
��
���
���
������������� �������������
�
���������� !"#��$"�����%"&!
���"�!
���$$��'�
���'$&!
��!�$�&!�
(&����)#"**�
�+��*&���
���!�����%�
��"�� &&��,��
"**"��$�&!�'���&$
��$����!�$"!%
��!$"!%
�$&!
�!!���&�
&!�&�
�,!���
���*��&!
�&-�**��'��+��,!%
.�"%+�&!
�&��+/"�*��+,��+
0�!�&!
������
������
������
������
������
������
���������
��
���
��
�
������
������
�"!��!�!�������%�
��$������
��
�������&,��$
�&,!�"�$
��%"&!��//"��$
�*�&�����!���
�!���$������&,��$
�� �+���1,�����$ 2�2��&,��$
�������&,��$
�!���$������&,��$3�����#"��"&!�.2�2�.,$"!�$$��&,��$4
�
MDOT Phase II SWMP Page 10-4 April 2005
Table 10-1 University Region Contact Information
University Region Office Region Engineer: Mark Chaput Region Storm Water Coordinator: Bob Batt
4701 W. Michigan Ave Jackson, MI 49201 Phone: 517-750-0401 FAX:517-750-4397
Brighton TSC Manager: Steve Bower 10321 E. Grand River, STE. 500 Brighton, MI 48116
Phone: 810-227-4681 FAX: 810-227-7929
Jackson TSC Manager: Dee Parker 2750 N. Elm Rd. Jackson, MI 49201-6802
Phone: 517-780-7540 FAX: 517-780-5454
Lansing TSC Manager: Paul Steinman 1019 Trowbridge Road E. Lansing, MI 48823
Phone: 517-324-2260 FAX: 517-324-0294
Tecumseh Construction Office Manager: Hal Zweng
Phone: 517-423-4858 FAX: 517-423-6014
For storm water-related concerns at the rest areas, the following individual should be contacted: Region Storm Water Coordinator: Bob Batt
Phone: 517-750-0401 FAX:517-750-4397
Lansing Rest Area 810 US-127 NB
Ingham County North bound on US-127, 1 mile south of I-96 and US-127 interchange.
Okemos Rest Area 811 I-96 WB, Mile Marker 111
Ingham County West bound on I-96, 1 mile east of Okemos Road Exit.
Howell Rest Area 812 I-96 EB, Mile Marker 135
Livingston County East bound on I-96, 2 miles east of Exit 133.
Lake Chemung Rest Area 813 I-96 WB, Mile Marker 141
Livingston County
Northfield Church Rest Area 814 US-23 SB, Mile Marker 48
Washtenaw County South bound on US-23, 2 miles south of Exit 49.
Ann Arbor Rest Area 817 I-94 EB, Mile Marker 168
Washtenaw County East bound on I-94, 0.5 mile east of Baker Road Exit.
Grass Lake Rest Area 818 I-94 WB, Mile Marker 149
Jackson County West bound on I-94, 0.5 mile west of Exit 150.
MDOT Phase II SWMP Page 10-5 April 2005
Sandstone Rest Area 819 I-94 EB, Mile Marker 135
Jackson County East bound on I-94, 1 mile west of Exit 136.
Jackson Rest Area 820 US-127 SB
Jackson County South bound on US-127, 1 mile south of Berry Road Exit.
Dundee Welcome Center 822 US-23 NB, Mile Marker 7
Monroe County North bound on US-23, 1.5 miles south of Exit 9.
Monroe Welcome Center 823 I-75 NB, Mile Marker 10
Monroe County
Grand Ledge Rest Area 825 I-96 EB, Mile Marker 87
Clinton County East bound on I-96, 1 mile east of Exit 86, Grand Ledge Exit.
Carleton Rest Area 826 I-275 SB, Mile Marker 5
Monroe County
Potterville Rest Area 829 I-69 NB, Mile Marker 68
Eaton County North bound on I-69, 1 mile north of Exit 66, Potterville.
Woodbury Rest Area 830 I-69 WB, Mile Marker 101
Shiawassee County West bound on I-69, 3 miles east of Exit 98.
DeWitt Rest Area 831 US-27 SB
Clinton County
MDOT Phase II SWMP Page 10-6 April 2005
Table 10-2 University Region Activity Requirements
Activity #
Statewide (S) or
Urbanized Area (UA)
Implemented in this Region
E-1: Maintain and Use Lansing Information Center S* √ E-2: Publish Articles in MDOT Publications S* E-3: Provide Information on Watershed Stewardship on the MDOT Public Web site S* E-4: Provide Education Materials Along with Tap-in/Discharge Permit Applications S √ E-5: Notify and Invite Public to Review and Comment on the Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) S* √ E-6: Determine Partnership Potential with MDEQ Statewide Public Education Program S* T-1: Present Applicable Training Modules to the Job-Related Public S √ T-2: Certify MDOT's Staff for Pesticide/Fertilizer Application S* √ T-3: Train Staff Responsible for Administering Part 91 and those having Decision Making Authority for SESC Development or Review, Inspections, or Enforcement; and Storm Water Operators as Required under Part 31 S* √ T-4: Survey MDOT Staff on Storm Water Knowledge S* √ I-1: Submit and Implement Mapping Schedule for Outfalls UA* √ I-2: Perform Inventory and Dry Weather Screening on Outfalls UA* √ I-3: Receiving and Notifying MDEQ of Illicit Discharges and Actions Taken S √ I-4: Report Updates and Changes to Legal Authority Status S* I-5: Map Known Outfalls (statewide) S* √ C-1: Maintenance Requirements for MDOT Permanent BMPs S √ C-2: Identify and Coordinate with MPOs Having Storm Water Quality Control Programs S √ C-3: Procedure to Select, Apply, and Maintain Permanent BMPs for Storm Water Management Activities (Post-Const.) S √ C-4: Procedure to Work with MDEQ for Early Coordination on Initial Design Projects S* √ C-5: Review Projects with Storm Water Discharges to Water Bodies with a Promulgated Total Maximum Daily Load S* √ C-6: Implement Procedures to Select, Apply, and Maintain Permanent BMPs for Storm Water Management Activities (Post-Const.) S √ C-7: Internal Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Protocol for Construction Storm Water Control S* √ C-8: Periodically Update Drainage Manual S* C-9: Documentation and Tracking of Road Maintenance Activities S √ C-10: Procedure for Outfall Labeling UA* √ C-11: Review Flow Control Structures UA √ C-12: Audit the Pollution Incident Prevention Plan (PIPP) Requirements S √ A-1: Program Assessment and Reporting S √
* Indicates initial activity implementation is performed by others but Region will be affected.
MDOT Phase II SWMP Page 10-7 April 2005
Figure 10-2 Ann Arbor Urbanized Area IDEP Investigation Locations
O:\0
3260
9T\0
3\P
roje
ct\P
hase
II M
aps
11-1
6-04
-MDOT road data are from the Michigan Center for Geographic Information Library and the MDOT graphics department database (Oct 2004). -Base map data were obtained from the Michigan Center for Geographic Information Library.-Urbanized Area status is based on 2000 census data. -Rivers with upper case labels are impaired waterbodies
���� ����
��
��
��������
��
��BR12
��23
��12
��23
���94
���94
��14
��14
��153
���275��23
��94
��17
���94FORD LAKEBELLEVILLE LAKE
Huron River
Fowler Drain
Paint Creek
Salin
e Rive
rRIVER ROUGE
1
3
5
Ann Arbor UA
Washtenaw CountyWayne County
Metro Region
University Region
�0 1 2 3 4Miles
Designer: NKT
Date: 3-28-05
Legend
Impaired Waterbodies
Waterbodies
MDOT Road
County Lines
MDOT RegionsUrbanized Area
Other UA
�� IDEP Field Investigation Locations
MDOT Phase II SWMP Page 10-8 April 2005
Figure 10-3 Detroit Urbanized Area IDEP Investigation Locations
O:\0
3260
9T\0
3\P
roje
ct\P
hase
II M
aps
11-1
6-04
-MDOT road data are from the Michigan Center for Geographic Information Library and the MDOT graphics department database (Oct 2004). -Base map data were obtained from the Michigan Center for Geographic Information Library. -Urbanized Area status is based on 2000 census data. -Rivers with upper case labels are impaired waterbodies.
���� �� ������
��
������
��������
��
��
�� ������ ��������������
�� ��������
���� ������������
������ ������
����
������
��
����
����
��
������
���94
��85
���75
��12
��24
���96
��23
��153
��1���75
���94
��59
��24
��24
��53
���94
���275
���96
��10��5��102
���696
��59
��97��3
��12��23
��39
��24
��14
Macomb County
Wayne County
Oakland County
Washtenaw County
Metro Region
University Region
Livingston County
Lake St. Clair
Det
roit
Riv
er
St.
Cla
ir R
iver
���375
��154
��8
��15
��150
Clinton River
Sal
t Riv
er
Kent
Lak
e
Ecorse River
Dee
r C
reek
Bay Region
Genesee CountyShiawassee
County
Detroit UA
0 4 8 12Miles
Designer: NKT
Date: 3-28-05
�Legend
Impaired Waterbodies
Waters of the State
MDOT Roads
MDOT Regions
CountiesDetroit UA
Other UA
�� IDEP Field Investigation Locations
MDOT Phase II SWMP Page 10-9 April 2005
Figure 10-4 Jackson Urbanized Area IDEP Investigation Locations
O:\0
3260
9T\0
3\P
roje
ct\P
hase
II M
aps
11-1
6-04
-MDOT road data are from the Michigan Center for Geographic Information Library and the MDOT graphics department database (Oct 2004). -Base map data were obtained from the Michigan Center for Geographic Information Library. -Urbanized Area status is based on 2000 census data. -Rivers with upper case labels are impaired waterbodies.
��
��127
��127
���94
���94
PORTAGE RIVER
GRAND RIVER
Center Lake
Sandstone Creek
Gilletts Lake
VANDERCOOKLAKE
��94
��94
��50
��50
��127
��127
��127
��106
��50
��BR127
��60
Jackson County
University Region
Jackson UA
�0 1 2 3Miles
Designer: NKT
Date: 3-28-05�� IDEP Field Investigation Locations
LegendImpaired Waterbodies
Waterbodies
MDOT Roads
County Lines
MDOT Regions
Urbanized Area
Other UA
MDOT Phase II SWMP Page 10-10 April 2005
Figure 10-5 Lansing Urbanized Area IDEP Investigation Locations
O:\0
3260
9T\0
3\P
roje
ct\P
hase
II M
aps
11-1
6-04
-MDOT road data are from the Michigan Center for Geographic Information Library and the MDOT graphics department database (Oct 2004). -Base map data were obtained from the Michigan Center for Geographic Information Library. -Urbanized Area status is based on 2000 census data. -Rivers with upper case label are impaired waterbodies
��
��
��
����
���� ����
��
����
����
���96���69
���69
���96
��127
���496
���496
��127
��43
��43
��99
��36
GRAND RIVER
MU
D C
RE
EK
Looking Glass River
Red Cedar River
SY
CA
MO
RE
CR
EE
K
Grand River
���96
��100��99
��43 ��69
��96
��27
���69
��27
���69
Clinton County
Eaton County
Ingham County
Shiawassee County
University Region
��96
���69
Lansing UA
IoniaCounty
Grand Region
�0 1 2 3 4Miles
Designer: NKT
Date: 2-17-05�� IDEP Field Investigation Locations
LegendImpaired Waterbodies
Waterbodies
MDOT Roads
County Lines
MDOT Regions
Urbanized Area
Other UA
MDOT Phase II SWMP Page 10-11 April 2005
Figure 10-6 Monroe Urbanized Area IDEP Investigation Locations
O:\0
3260
9T\0
3\P
roje
ct\P
hase
II M
aps
11-1
6-04
-MDOT road data are from the Michigan Center for Geographic Information Library and the MDOT graphics department database (Oct 2004). -Base map data were obtained from the Michigan Center for Geographic Information Library. -Urbanized Area status is based on 2000 census data.-Rivers with upper case labels are impaired waterbodies
������������
����
��
��24
���75
���75
��24
��50
RIVER RAISIN
Stony Creek
SANDY CREEK
Mason Run ��125
Monroe UA
Monroe County
University Region
���275
Lake Erie
�0 1 2Miles
Designer: NKT
Date: 3-28-05�� IDEP Field Investigation Locations
LegendImpaired Waterbodies
Waterbodies
MDOT Roads
County Lines
MDOT Regions
Urbanzied Area
Other UA
MDOT Phase II SWMP Page 10-12 April 2005
Figure 10-7 South Lyon Howell-Brighton Urbanized Area IDEP Investigation Locations
O:\0
3260
9T\0
3\P
roje
ct\P
hase
II M
aps
11-1
6-04
-MDOT road data are from the Michigan Center for Geographic Information Library and the MDOT graphics department database (Oct 2004). -Base map data were obtained from the Michigan Center for Geographic Information Library. -Urbanized Area status is based on 2000 census data. -Rivers with upper case labels are impaired waterbodies
����
��
����
���96
��23
���96
���96
��59
��36 ��23
���96
SH
IAW
AS
SE
E R
IVE
R
Huron Rive
r
Por
tage
Lak
e
Lake Chemung
Davis Creek
Man
n C
reek
Thompson Lake
HONEY CREEK
Whitmore Lake
Kent Lake
Red C
edar River
Howell UA
Brighton UA
South Lyon UA
University Region
Metro Region
Washtenaw County
Livingston County
Oakland County
�0 1 2 3 4Miles
Designer: NKT
Date: 3-28-05�� IDEP Field Investigation Locations
LegendImpaired Waterbodies
Waterbodies
MDOT Roads
MDOT Regions
County Lines
Urbanized Area
Other UA
MDOT Phase II SWMP Page 10-13 April 2005
Figure 10-8 Toledo Urbanized Area IDEP Investigation Locations O
:\032
609T
\03\
Pro
ject
\Pha
se II
Map
s 11
-16-
04
-MDOT road data are from the Michigan Center for Geographic Information Library and the MDOT graphics department database (Oct 2004). -Base map data were obtained from the Michigan Center for Geographic Information Library. -Urbanized Area status is based on 2000 census data. -Rivers with upper case labels are impaired waterbodies.
��24
��23
��125
��2 ���75
Ohio
Monroe County
University Region
Halfw
ay Creek
Bay Creek
Indian Creek
Springbrook
Halfway Creek
Toledo UA
�0 1 2Miles
Designer: NKT
Date: 3-28-05
LegendImpaired Waterbodies
Waterbodies
MDOT Roads
County Lines
MDOT Regions
Urbanized Area
Other UA
No IDEP Investigations in Toledo UA
MDOT Phase II SWMP Page 10-14 April 2005
THIS PAGE BLANK
