1 David Gachiri Nderitu SUFG, Purdue University [email protected] Quantifying the benefits of...
-
Upload
annabel-simpson -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
5
Transcript of 1 David Gachiri Nderitu SUFG, Purdue University [email protected] Quantifying the benefits of...
1
David Gachiri Nderitu
SUFG, Purdue University
Quantifying the benefits of distributed generation in imperfectly competitive electricity markets
2
In this Presentation
• DG has a lot of benefitsMarket power mitigationReliabilitySecurity
• Especially when in oligopolistic marketsAverage cost models hide their value
• Spatial oligopoly model for Midwest
3
Statement of Imperfect Competition
)()( qPQPP
Each firms decision variable is to maximize its profit
)()( ssss qTCqqP
Given a a market price
)( ss qTC
And the firms total cost function
4
Profit Maximizing Conditions
0
sss
ss
s qMCq
PqP
q
And expanded further into
0.
sssk s
k
kss qMC
q
q
q
P
q
PqP
Conjectural variations model
5
Alternative Assumptions/Models
• Cournot 0
s
skq
q 0
sqP
• Cartel
• Price leadership MRL = MCL on residual demand
• Quasi-competitive MCP
MCMR
6
Relative Prices
Marginal Cost
Marginal Revenue
Quantity
Price
Car
tel
Bertland
Cournot
Cartel
Cou
rnot
Ber
tlan
d
Demand curve
7
Suppliers in Electricity Market
i j
ijsijigsi
igsisi
iS FwhPGcqPMax ***
..TS s
isiii qbaP
j
jisj
ijsg
isis FFPGq
igsigs PGPG max
ijs
jiss
ijs FFF max
8
KKT Optimality
g j jjisijsigsisss FFPGqL 1
s sjisijsisij FFqF max2
igsigs PGP max3
9
Complementarity Problem
0
igs
s
PG
L0
ijs
s
F
L
0*
ijsijs
s FF
L0*
igsigs
s PGPG
L
Cournot Assumption
0
igs
igk
PG
PG0
ijs
ijk
F
F
10
Case Study
PJM
AE
MAPP
CILC
CE
IPAMRN
SPIL
EEI
SIPCSIGECO
BREC
TVA
LG&EEKPC
HEREC
IPL
PSI
NIPSCO
CPC
DECO
FE
AEP
OVEC
VP
DPL
CG&E
DLCO
APS
OHY
SPP
AW
11
Demand Response
-8.0%
-7.0%
-6.0%
-5.0%
-4.0%
-3.0%
-2.0%
-1.0%
0.0%
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0
% reduction in demand
% c
han
ge
in In
dia
na
pea
k p
rice