TeachingtheCurrent) Economic)Crisisin) IntroductoryEconomics ) Department/Econom… ·...

Post on 06-Mar-2018

214 views 0 download

Transcript of TeachingtheCurrent) Economic)Crisisin) IntroductoryEconomics ) Department/Econom… ·...

Teaching  the  Current  Economic  Crisis  in  

Introductory  Economics  Clark  Ross  

Davidson  College  Davidson,  NC  

Gabriel  Sanchez  Bonita  High  School  

La  Verne,  CA  

The  presenters  gratefully  acknowledge  the  assistance  of  Asst.  Professor  Shyam  Gouri  Suresh  (Department  of  Economics)  and  David  Heilbron  ’13,  both  from  Davidson  College.  

Macroeconomics  Content  Areas  

I. Measurement  of  Economic  Performance  – National  income  accounts  – Unemployment  

II. National  Income  and  Price  Determination  – Aggregate  demand  – Macroeconomic  equilibrium  

III. Financial  Sector  – Money,  banking,  and  financial  markets  – Loanable  funds  market  – Central  bank  and  control  of  the  money  supply  

Macroeconomics  Content  Areas  

IV. Stabilization  Policies  – Fiscal  and  monetary  policies  

V. Open  Economy:  International  Trade  and  Finance  

– Imports,  exports,  and  financial  capital  flows  

Full  Content  Area  Descriptions:  AP  Economics  Course  Description,  pg.  26-­‐27,  http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/public/repository/ap-­‐economics-­‐course-­‐description.pdf  

Purpose  of  the  Session  

• Incorporate  the  Economic  Performance  of  the  US  from  2005-­‐2012  into  an  introductory  economics  course:    – College  level,  AP,  IB,  or  honors  

• Do  this  by:  1. Explaining  the  crisis  of  2007-­‐2012.  2. Showing  the  policy  tools  that  were  used  to  

address  the  crisis.  3. Discussing  the  continued  economics  problems  

and  stagnation.  

SETTING  THE  STAGE  

Presenter
Origins Economic problems of 06, 07

Causes  of  the  Crisis  and  Collapse  (2004-­‐2007)  

High  Aggregate  Demand  Fueled  by:  – High  Consumer  spending  and  low  consumer  savings  

– Ease  of  home  equity  loans  and  credit  borrowing  – Stock  market  gains  that  increased  real  wealth  and  spending  

– Expansion  of  residential  real  estate  construction  

Expansion  of  Residential  Real  Estate  Construction  

1. Low  interest  rates  from  expansionary  monetary  policy  

2. Housing  policy  aimed  at  increasing  home  ownership  

3. Incentive  to  negotiate  new  mortgages  with  high  up-­‐front  costs  

4. Variable-­‐rate  interest  mortgages  with  low  initial  rates  

Expansion  of  Residential  Real  Estate  Construction  

5. Legislation  – Deductible  mortgage  interest  and  real-­‐estate  taxes  – Financial  Services  Modernization  Act  of  1999  – Commodity  Futures  Modernization  Act  of  2000  

6. Securitization  of  these  mortgages,  with  their  being  sold  to  other  financial  institutions  

7. Role  of  rating  agencies  – Standard  and  Poor’s  – Moody’s  

Price  Level  

Y  

SAS  

AD  

AD’   LRAS   LRAS’  

Y0  2004  

Y1  2007  

Real  GDP  

 

Unemployment  Rate  

 

Consumer  Price  Index  

Dow  Jones  

 

30  Year  Real  Mortgage  Rate  

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

%  

Presenter
MORTG- 1 year inflation rates (avg. of CPI and PGD) http://www.phil.frb.org/research-and-data/real-time-center/survey-of-professional-forecasters/historical-data/inflation-forecasts.cfm

 REMEDIES  IN  2007-­‐2008  

Traditional  Tools  of  Expansionary  Monetary  Policy  

1. Open  Market  Purchase  of  Bonds  by  Federal  Reserve  

2. Lower  Discount  Rate  – Rate  at  which  banks  may  borrow  from  the  

Federal  Reserve  

3. Lower  Required  Reserve  Ratio  

Federal  Funds  Rate  

 

2007-­‐08  Fiscal  Policy  

• 2008:  $152  Billion  in  Stimulus  –Includes  $600  credit  to  each  taxpayer  

• Fed  Budget  Deficit    –1.2%  of  GDP  in  2007  –3.2%  of  GDP  in  2008    

 FURTHER  REMEDIES  IN  

2009-­‐2010  

• Increasing  problems  signal  need  for  more  action  –Unemployment  rate  was  a  major  signal       January  1,  2008   5.0  %  

January  1,  2009   7.8%  

January  1,  2010   9.7%  

2009  Fiscal  Policy  

• American  Recovery  and  Reinvestment  Act  –$787  Billion  –Keynesian  basis  was  assumed  • Debate  revolved  around  how  big  • Debate  relating  to  proportion  of  Expenditure  Increases  versus  Tax  Decreases  • Little  Classical  rebuttal    

– Totaled  almost  5%  of  GDP  

2009  Fiscal  Policy  

• Troubled  Asset  Relief  Program  (TARP)  – Actually  passed  under  Bush  in  late  2008  • Result  of  the  Emergency  Economic  Stabilization  Act  of  2008  

– Truly  implemented  in  2009  – Slated  for  cost  of  $700  Billion  • Only  spent  about  half  • Cost  only  $25  Billion  according  to  the  CBO  

– Overseen  by  the  Treasury  Department  – Purchased  troubled  bank  assets  

“March  Oversight  Report:  The  Final  Report  of  the  Congressional  Oversight  Panel,”  16  March  2011,  http://cybercemetery.unt.edu/archive/cop/20110401232213/http:/cop.senate.gov/documents/cop-­‐031611-­‐report.pdf  

State/Local  Gov’t  Expenditure  as  Percentage  of  GDP  

Presenter
Spending Multiplier not having a real impact Drop off right after the end of recession period

• Formula/Definition:  – Yield  on  a  10  year  government  bond,  adjusted  for  future  inflation.  

• Indicates  negative  real  interest  rates  

10-­‐Year  Treasury  Inflation-­‐Indexed  Security,  Constant  Maturity  

10-­‐Year  Treasury  Inflation-­‐Indexed  Security,  Constant  Maturity  

Loanable  Funds  Market  

• In  current  crisis  there  is  no  Crowding  Out  • Given  the  very  elastic  supply  of  funds  to  purchase  government  bonds  –Both  purchases  by  the  Federal  Reserve  (expanding  balance  sheet)  and  by  foreign  governments  

$  Funds  

rr  

No  Crowding  Out  

D   D1  

r0,  r1  

S  

F0   F1  

$  Funds  

rr  

Significant  Crowding  Out  

D   D1  

r0  

S  

r1  

F0   F1  F1’  

F0  –  F1’  =    Amount  of  Crowding  Out  

 

With  a  less  elastic    supply  of  funds  

2009-­‐10  Monetary  Policy  

• Continuation  of  near-­‐zero  Fed  Funds  Rate  • Quantitative  Easing  –Done  by  the  FED  –Overall  strategy  was  the  purchase  of  various  financial  assets  with  newly  created  money.  

“QE  1  vs.  2  vs.  3…:  A  Framework  for  Analyzing  Large  Scale  Asset  Purchases  as  a  Monetary  Policy  Tool,”  Mark  Gertler  and  Peter  Karadi,    March  2012,  pg  2.  

Presenter
http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/conferences/GertlerKaradi.pdf

2009-­‐10  Monetary  Policy  

• Quantitative  Easing  – QE  1  (Sept  2008):  “the  purchase  over  time  of  a  variety  of  high  grade  securities,  including  agency  mortgage  backed  securities  (AMBS),  agency  debt,  and  long  term  government  bonds,  with  AMBS  ultimately  accounting  for  the  bulk  of  the  purchases.”    

– QE  2  (Oct  2010):  “this  time  restricted  to  long  term  government  bonds  and  smaller  in  scale  than  QE1.”  

“QE  1  vs.  2  vs.  3…:  A  Framework  for  Analyzing  Large  Scale  Asset  Purchases  as  a  Monetary  Policy  Tool,”  Mark  Gertler  and  Peter  Karadi,    March  2012,  pg  2.  

2009-­‐10  Monetary  Policy  

• Quantitative  Easing  –QE  3  • Launched  September  13,  2012  • FED  will  purchase  $40  Billion  of  bonds  per  month  • Open  ended  time  frame  • Expected  to  keep  interest  rates  low  “at  least  through  mid-­‐2015”  • In  addition  to  continued  Operation  Twist  

“Fed  to  Launch  QE3  of  $40  Billion  MBS  Each  Month,”  Steve  Goldstein,  http://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/2012/09/13/fed-­‐to-­‐launch-­‐qe3-­‐40-­‐billion-­‐mbs-­‐each-­‐month/  

2009-­‐10  Monetary  Policy  

• Operation  Twist  – September  2011  – “essentially  a  sterilized  acquisition  of  long  term  government  bonds  financed  by  selling  some  of  its  short  term  bonds.”  –Aim  was  to  encourage  long-­‐term  investment  by  lowering  long-­‐term  interest  rates  

“QE  1  vs.  2  vs.  3…:  A  Framework  for  Analyzing  Large  Scale  Asset  Purchases  as  a  Monetary  Policy  Tool,”  Mark  Gertler  and  Peter  Karadi,    March  2012,  pg  2.  

FED  Balance  Sheet,  2007  Balance  Sheet  of  Federal  Reserve  Banks,  Feb  2007  (billions  of  dollars)  

Assets   Liabilities  U.S.  Government  Securities   780.8   Federal  Reserves  

notes   770.9  

Loans  to  Banks   0.2   Bank  reserve  deposits   22.9  

Other  assets   100.3   Other  liabilities  and  capital   87.5  

Total  Assets   881.3   Total  liabilities  and  capital   881.3  

Macroeconomics:  Theories  and  Policies,  Richard  T.  Froyen,  10th  Edition,  pg.  304  

Balance  Sheet  of  Federal  Reserve  Banks,  Feb  2011  (billions  of  dollars)  

Assets   Liabilities  U.S.  Government  Securities   1201.4   Federal  Reserves  

notes   995.4  

Loans  to  financial  institutions   21.9   Bank  reserve  

deposits   1265.9  

Mortgage-­‐Backed  securities   958.4   Other  liabilities  and  

capital   244.1  

Federal  agency  securities   144.2  

Other  assets   179.5  

Total  Assets   2505.4   Total  liabilities  and  capital   2505.4  

Macroeconomics:  Theories  and  Policies,  Richard  T.  Froyen,  10th  Edition,  pg.  307  

FED  Balance  Sheet,  2011  

Money  Supply  and  GDP  

• Velocity:  The  number  of  times  per  year  that  the  average  dollar  in  the  money  supply  is  spent  for  final  goods  and  services.  [Economics,  McConnell  Brue  Flynn,  19th  edition,  8-­‐30]  

M1V  =  PQ  M1  x  Velocity  =  Nominal  GDP  

Velocity  of  M1  

 

MODEL  CONSIDERATIONS  /  SUMMING  UP  

• Long  term:  the  model  works  • Historical  examples  of  looking  back  and  seeing  that  the  model  was  actually  correct  • 2007:“Perfect  Storm”  –Bubbles  bursting  –Greed  –Decreased  role  of  regulation  

• 1932  and  2007  Financial  Recessions  with  long  recovery  periods    

FURTHER  CONSIDERATIONS  AND  

 RELATED  CONCERNS  

• Natural  Rate  of  Unemployment  • Savings  •Wealth  of  Households  • Europe  • China  

UNP  

 

Natural  Rate  of  UNP  

 

• Natural  Rate  of  Unemployment  • Savings  •Wealth  of  Households  • Europe  • China  

Personal  Savings  

 

Personal  Savings  Rate  

 

• Natural  Rate  of  Unemployment  • Savings  •Wealth  of  Households  • Europe  • China  

Total  Net  Worth  

 

Median  Value  of  Net  Worth  for  Families  

“US  News:  Families’  Net  Worth  Drops  to  ‘90s  Level,”  Kristina  Peterson,  The  Wall  Street  Journal,  12  June  2012,  A5.  

Presenter
http://ezproxy.lib.davidson.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1019869253?accountid=10427

Median  Value  of  Net  Worth  for  Families  

“US  News:  Families’  Net  Worth  Drops  to  ‘90s  Level,”  Kristina  Peterson,  The  Wall  Street  Journal,  12  June  2012,  A5.  

• Natural  Rate  of  Unemployment  • Savings  •Wealth  of  Households  • Europe  • China  

Trade  Balance-­‐EU  

 

“Trade  in  Goods  with  European  Union,”  United  States  Census  Bureau,  http://www.census.gov/foreign-­‐trade/balance/c0003.html  

European  Long-­‐Term  Interest  Rates  

“Long-­‐term  interest  rate  statistics  for  EU  Member  States,”  European  Central  Bank,  http://www.ecb.int/stats/money/long/html/index.en.html  

Presenter
http://www.ecb.int/stats/money/long/html/index.en.html

• Natural  Rate  of  Unemployment  • Savings  •Wealth  of  Households  • Europe  • China  

Trade  Balance-­‐China  

 

“Trade  in  Goods  with  China,”  United  States  Census  Bureau,  http://www.census.gov/foreign-­‐trade/balance/c5700.html  

QUESTIONS  /  ANSWERS  

Free  Response  2009  Form  B  

2009  Form  B  Answer  

2009  Form  B  Answer  

2009  Form  B  Answer  

Free  Response  2010  Form  B  

2010  Form  B  Answer  

2010  Form  B  Answer  

2010  Form  B  Answer  

Free  Response  2011  Form  B  

2011  Form  B  Answer  

2011  Form  B  Answer  

2011  Form  B  Answer  

Free  Response  2011  

2011  Free  Response  Answer  

2011  Free  Response  Answer  

2011  Free  Response  Answer  

Free  Response  2012  

2012  Free  Response  Answer  

2012  Free  Response  Answer  

2012  Free  Response  Answer  

c) 4  points:  • 1  point  is  earned  for  stating  that  the  current  account  

deficit  will  increase.  • 1  point  is  earned  for  explaining  that  the  increase  in  

real  GDP  increases  income  which  causes  imports  to  increase  and  net  exports  to  decrease.  

• 1  point  is  earned  for  stating  that  the  international  value  of  the  bera  will  decrease.  

• 1  point  is  earned  for  explaining  that  the  decline  in  the  international  value  of  the  bera  is  due  to  an  increase  in  the  supply  of  the  bera.  

Free  Response  2008  

2008  Free  Response  Answer  

2008  Free  Response  Answer  

2008  Free  Response  Answer  

Free  Response  2008  Form  B  

2008  Form  B  Answer  

2008  Form  B  Answer  

2008  Form  B  Answer  

All  data  and  graphs  taken  from:    

Fed  FRED  http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/  

Unless  otherwise  cited