Post on 03-May-2018
Road & Bridge Design Publications
Monthly Update – January 2018
1
Revisions for the month of January are listed and displayed below. New special details will be included in projects submitted for the February letting as is stated on the special detail index sheets. E-mail Road related questions on these changes to MDOT-Road-Design-Standards@michigan.gov. E-mail Bridge related questions to MDOT-Bridge-Design-Standards@michigan.gov. Special Details Note: The following special details for non-reinforced, single-slope, PCB designs (originally released in the May Monthly Update, but removed in November) have been added back to the special detail index for projects requiring MASH compliant barrier. R-49-G: Concrete Barrier R-50-G: Light Standard Foundation R-51-E: Sign Support Foundation R-54-I: Concrete Barrier, Single Face R-71-C: Guardrail Anchorage, Median R-76-E: Concrete Glare Screen A FUSP (already approved) is needed in conjunction with these designs. Note: MDOT has discontinued the use of the X-lite guardrail terminal effective with the February 2018 letting. The Specifications and Estimates unit are working to issue addenda for projects already submitted for advertisement and letting. Project managers should otherwise use these revised special details for all projects that include the pay items for Guardrail Approach Terminal, Type __. R-61-H: Guardrail Approach Terminal Types 1B & 1T: Removed the X-Lite Flared terminal details. R-62-H: Guardrail Approach Terminal Types 2B & 2T: Removed the X-Lite Tangent-50 terminal details. Road Design Manual 1.02.04: Drainage Maps: A paragraph pertaining to ROW width for county drains was moved to this section from Chapter 5.
Road & Bridge Design Publications
Monthly Update – January 2018
2
3.06: Design Speed: Expanded the allowance to retain the design speed used at the time of original construction or latest reconstruction to include non-freeway 3R projects where the posted speed has been increased. Also, added a paragraph on the project design speed to be recorded on the title sheet. 3.09.02A: Non-Freeway 3R Minimum Guidelines: Updated the design speed for 3R work on non-freeways (NHS) to reflect current policy allowing the minimum design speed to be greater than or equal to posted speed without design exceptions. The practice of selecting a design speed 5 mph greater than posted speed is encouraged when practical but is not a minimum standard subject to design exception. Appendix 3A: Updated the design speed for 4R work to reflect current policy allowing the minimum design speed to be greater than or equal to posted speed without design exceptions. The practice of selecting a design speed 5 mph greater than posted speed is encouraged when practical but is not a minimum standard subject to design exception. Chapter 5: ROW: Revised to reflect changes to the right-of-way plan process. Design Project Managers overseeing projects that require right-of-way acquisitions for proper constructability should utilize the processes outlined in this chapter during the design process. Good communication between Design and Real Estate is needed throughout the project design process. This communication partnership will help with avoiding any project delays that might arise during the right-of-way acquisition process which could jeopardize the project’s scheduled ROW certification date. 7.01.25: Guardrail Approach Terminals: Removed the X-Lite Flared and the X-Lite Tangent-50 from the list of approved terminals. Bridge Design Manual 7.01.03 (LFD & LRFD), 8.02 G. (LFD & LRFD): Added Grade S2M, P1M and DM concrete. Use note with Special Provision for Grade S2M, P1M & DM concretes. 8.02 J. (LFD & LRFD): Note deleted. Information located in Reference Information Documents in Projectwise. See section 3.03.05 of Bridge Design Manual. 7.06.02 B. (LFD & LRFD), 8.06.01 L. (LFD & LRFD), 8.06.08 F. (LFD & LRFD), 8.07.04 Y. (LFD & LRFD), and 8.09.01 D. (LFD & LRFD): Tensile load-only overhead applications are not a concern for adhesive anchors. Continue to use adhesive anchors from MDOT’s Qualified Products List.
Road & Bridge Design Publications
Monthly Update – January 2018
3
12.08.02: Galvanic anode information is in the Standard Specifications for Construction. Updates to MDOT Cell Library, Bridge Auto Draw Program, etc., may be required in tandem with some of this month's updates. Until such updates to automated tools can be made, it is the designer's/detailer's responsibility to manually incorporate any necessary revisions to notes and plan details to reflect these revisions.
Index to Special Details
1-29-2018
SPECIAL DETAIL
NUMBER
NUMBER
OF SHEETS
TITLE
CURRENT
DATE
21
2 GUARDRAIL AT INTERSECTIONS 3-14-16
24
8
GUARDRAIL ANCHORED IN BACKSLOPE TYPES 4B, 4T, & 4MGS-8 4-25-16
99
2
CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH WIRE ROPE 9-22-14
R-1-G 9
DRAINAGE STRUCTURES 6-15-16
R-28-J 7
SIDEWALK RAMP AND DETECTABLE WARNING DETAILS 12-11-17
R-39-K 5
TRANSVERSE PAVEMENT JOINTS 9-25-17
*R-49-G 9
CONCRETE BARRIER 2-24-17
*R-50-G 6
LIGHT STANDARD FOUNDATION 4-21-17
*R-51-E 6
SIGN SUPPORT FOUNDATION 4-21-17
R-53-A 22
TEMPORARY CONCRETE BARRIER LIMITED DEFLECTION 8-14-15
*R-54-I 4
CONCRETE BARRIER, SINGLE FACE 3-22-17
R-56-F 8
GUARDRAIL MEDIAN OBJECT PROTECTION 9-8-16
R-60-J 17
GUARDRAIL TYPES A, B, BD, T, TD, MGS-8, & MGS-8D 7-26-17
*R-61-H 15
GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINAL TYPES 1B & 1T (SRT & FLEAT) 1-24-18
*R-62-H 9
GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINAL TYPES 2B & 2T (SKT & ET-Plus) 1-24-18
R-63-C 16
GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINAL TYPES 3B & 3T 3-15-16
R-66-E 4
GUARDRAIL DEPARTING TERMINAL TYPES B, T, & MGS 4-27-16
R-67-G 7
GUARDRAIL ANCHORAGE, BRIDGE, DETAILS 8-9-17
*R-71-C 1
GUARDRAIL ANCHORAGE, MEDIAN 3-22-17
R-72-D 11
W-BEAM BACKED GUARDRAIL & GUARDRAIL LONG SPAN INSTALLATIONS 5-11-16
R-73-F 6
GUARDRAIL OVER BOX OR SLAB CULVERTS 3-15-16
*R-76-E 3
CONCRETE GLARE SCREEN 3-22-17
R-112-I 9
SHOULDER AND CENTER LINE CORRUGATIONS 12-12-16
R-126-I 5
PLACEMENT OF TEMPORARY CONCRETE & STEEL BARRIER 8-25-15
R-127-F 8
DELINEATOR INSTALLATIONS 8-8-17
* Denotes New or Revised Special Detail to be included in projects for (beginning with) the February letting.
Note: Former Standard Plans IV-87, IV-89, IV-90, and IV-91 Series, used for building cast-in-place concrete head walls for elliptical and circular pipe culverts, are now being replaced with plans that detail each specific size. The Special Structures Unit will provide these full sized special details for inclusion in construction plans for MDOT jobs. To assure prompt delivery, requests must be made in advance.
Former Standard Plans IV-93 and IV-94 series have been replaced with precast concrete box & three-sided culverts as per the 2012 Standard Specifications for Construction.
Index to Bridge Detail Sheets
1-29-2018
DETAIL NUMBER
NUMBER
OF SHEETS
TITLE
CURRENT
DATE
B-22-E
4 BRIDGE RAILING, THRIE BEAM RETROFIT (R4 TYPE RAILING) 3-15-16
B-23-F
4 BRIDGE RAILING, THRIE BEAM RETROFIT (OPEN PARAPET RAILING) 3-15-16
B-101-G
2 DRAIN CASTING ASSEMBLEY DETAILS 2-8-16
EJ3AB
1 or 2
EXPANSION JOINT DETAILS 2-10-16
EJ4O
1 or 2
EXPANSION JOINT DETAILS 2-10-16
PC-1M
1
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE I-BEAM DETAILS 8-23-17
PC-2H
1
70" PRESTRESSED CONCRETE I-BEAM DETAILS 8-23-17
PC-4F
1
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE 1800 BEAM DETAILS 8-23-17
* Denotes New or Revised Special Detail to be included in projects for
(beginning with) the February letting. Note: Details EJ3AA & EJ4N are interactive, i.e. designers and detailers choose details
based upon railing type and angle of crossing. Place all details appropriate for the project, structure specific information, and the Expansion Joint Device quantity on the sheet. The sheet shall then be added to the plans as a normal plan sheet.
Detail PC-1L, PC-2G and PC-4E shall have structure specific information and quantities added to the sheet. The sheet shall then be added to the plans as a normal plan sheet.
B.L.T.
W.K.P. R-49-G
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVALCHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
Michigan Department of Transportation
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
APPROVED BY:
APPROVED BY:
Kirk T. Steudle
BY
PREPARED
DESIGN DIVISION
DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF FIELD SERVICES
DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT
CONCRETE BARRIER
8'-0" TAPERED SECTION
(SEE NOTES)
20'-0" MAXIMUM BETWEEN JOINTS
CONCRETE BARRIER CONCRETE BARRIER - SPLIT
40"
SEE EXPANSION JOINT DETAIL
AND END OF SPLIT SECTIONS
1" EXPANSION JOINT AT BEGINNING
6"
PLAN
A
A B
B
PAVEMENT STENCILS IMPRINTED ‚" DEEP.
BOTH SIDES OF THE BARRIER. USE 3" TO 4"
CONSTRUCTION STATIONING SHALL BE PLACED ON
7 + 00
2'-4"
< 1"
SEE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
BARRIER REFLECTIVE MARKER
ELEVATION
‚" FIBER JOINT FILLER
HATCHED AREA INDICATES
TYPE A BARRIER
E5 JOINT (TYP)
91
1
24
1
24
2-24-2017
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
R-49-G
CONCRETE BARRIER
SEE EXPANSION JOINT DETAIL
AT BRIDGE PIERS
1" EXPANSION JOINT
D
DC
C
WEAKNESS JOINT
PLANE OF
FILLER (TYP)
•" FIBER JOINT
MIN.
1'-6"
AND CONCRETE FILLER WALL SLAB
BETWEEN BACK OF CONCRETE BARRIER
PLACE ‚" x 4" FIBER JOINT FILLER
SLIP-FORMING (TYP)
2"< CLEARANCE FOR
20'-0" MAXIMUM BETWEEN JOINTS 20'-0" MAXIMUM BETWEEN JOINTS
IN CONCRETE FILLER SLAB
6'-0" TYPICAL JOINT SPACING
CONCRETE BARRIER SPLIT
PLAN
ELEVATION
TYPE A BARRIER
E5 JOINT (TYP)
92
1
24
24
1
‚" FIBER JOINT FILLER
HATCHED AREA INDICATES
PIER COLUMNS
2-24-2017
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
8" 16" 8"
32"
42"
1" R, (TYP)
•" BEVEL OR
SECTION A-A
8" 8"
42"
1" R, (TYP)
•" BEVEL OR
SECTION B-B
32" MIN. - 40" MAX.
R-49-G
CONCRETE BARRIER
VARIES
TYPE A BARRIER
93
1"
1"
RUBBER-ASPHALT
HOT POURED
JOINT FILLER
1" FIBER
E5 JOINT DETAIL
1"
JOINT FILLER
1" FIBER
EXPANSION JOINT DETAIL
TOP AND SIDES
•" R
3", WHICHEVER IS GREATER
VALLEY GUTTER/SHOULDER OR
THICKNESS OF ADJACENT
3", WHICHEVER IS GREATER
VALLEY GUTTER/SHOULDER OR
THICKNESS OF ADJACENT
CONCRETE SHOULDER (TYP)
CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER OR
E5 JOINT (TYP)
CONCRETE SHOULDER (TYP)
CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER OR
E5 JOINT (TYP)
2-24-2017
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
8" 8"
42"
1" R, (TYP)
•" BEVEL OR
SECTION C-C
SECTION D-D
9" 9"VARIES
VARIES 40" MIN.
ENGINEER (SEE NOTES)
MATERIAL APPROVED BY THE
MATERIAL CLASS II OR OTHER
TO BE FILLED WITH GRANULAR
(SEE NOTES)
4" CONCRETE FILLER SLAB
FILLER (TYP)
‚" FIBER JOINT
8" 8"
42"
1" R, (TYP)
•" BEVEL OR
9" 9"
ENGINEER (SEE NOTES)
MATERIAL APPROVED BY THE
MATERIAL CLASS II OR OTHER
TO BE FILLED WITH GRANULAR
(SEE NOTES)
4" CONCRETE FILLER SLAB
FILLER (TYP)
‚" FIBER JOINT
WIDTH OF PIER
SLIP-FORMING (TYP)
2"< CLEARANCE FOR
R-49-G
CONCRETE BARRIER
TYPE A BARRIER
94
CONCRETE SHOULDER (TYP)
CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER OR
E5 JOINT (TYP)
3", WHICHEVER IS GREATER
VALLEY GUTTER/SHOULDER OR
THICKNESS OF ADJACENT
CONCRETE SHOULDER (TYP)
CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER OR
E5 JOINT (TYP)
3", WHICHEVER IS GREATER
VALLEY GUTTER/SHOULDER OR
THICKNESS OF ADJACENT
2-24-2017
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
R-49-G
CONCRETE BARRIER
PAVEMENT STENCILS IMPRINTED ‚" DEEP.
BOTH SIDES OF THE BARRIER. USE 3" TO 4"
CONSTRUCTION STATIONING SHALL BE PLACED ON
7 + 00
2'-4"
< 1"
SEE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
BARRIER REFLECTIVE MARKER
ELEVATION
‚" FIBER JOINT FILLER
HATCHED AREA INDICATES
TYPE B BARRIER
8'-0" TAPERED SECTION
(SEE NOTES)
20'-0" MAXIMUM BETWEEN JOINTS
CONCRETE BARRIER CONCRETE BARRIER - SPLIT
40"
6"
PLAN
E F
FE5 JOINT (TYP)
E
95
1
24
SEE EXPANSION JOINT DETAIL
AND END OF SPLIT SECTIONS
1" EXPANSION JOINT AT BEGINNING
1
24
2-24-2017
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
R-49-G
CONCRETE BARRIER
ELEVATION
‚" FIBER JOINT FILLER
HATCHED AREA INDICATES
TYPE B BARRIER
SEE EXPANSION JOINT DETAIL
AT BRIDGE PIERS
1" EXPANSION JOINT
H
HG
G
WEAKNESS JOINT
PLANE OF
FILLER (TYP)
•" FIBER JOINT
MIN.
1'-6"
AND CONCRETE FILLER WALL SLAB
BETWEEN BACK OF CONCRETE BARRIER
PLACE ‚" x 4" FIBER JOINT FILLER
SLIP-FORMING (TYP)
2"< CLEARANCE FOR
20'-0" MAXIMUM BETWEEN JOINTS 20'-0" MAXIMUM BETWEEN JOINTS
IN CONCRETE FILLER SLAB
6'-0" TYPICAL JOINT SPACING
CONCRETE BARRIER SPLIT
PLAN
96
PIER COLUMNS
OUTSIDE PIER COLUMNS
AT 10'-0" MAX. SPACING
PLACE 4" DRAIN HOLES
4" DRAIN HOLE (TYP)
1
24
1
24
E5 JOINT (TYP)
2-24-2017
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
8" 16" 8"
32"
42"
1" R, (TYP)
•" BEVEL OR
SECTION E-E
8" 16" 8"
1" R, (TYP)
•" BEVEL OR
SECTION F-F
32" MIN. - 40" MAX.
3"
MIN.
3"
MIN.
8"
(TYP)
6"
(T
YP)
8"
(TYP)
6"
(T
YP)
9"
MI
N.
9"
MI
N.
9"
MI
N.
R-49-G
CONCRETE BARRIER
97
SEE NOTES
DOWEL (TYP)
SEE NOTES
DOWEL (TYP)
E5 JOINT (TYP)
CONCRETE SHOULDER (TYP)
CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER OR
E5 JOINT (TYP)
CONCRETE SHOULDER (TYP)
CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER OR
42"
9"
MI
N.
9"
MI
N.
9"
MI
N.
2-24-2017
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
8" 8"
1" R, (TYP)
•" BEVEL OR
SECTION G-G
SECTION H-H
9" 9"VARIES
VARIES 40" MIN.
(SEE NOTES)
4" CONCRETE FILLER SLAB
FILLER (TYP)
‚" FIBER JOINT
8" 8"
1" R, (TYP)
•" BEVEL OR
9" 9"
ENGINEER (SEE NOTES)
MATERIAL APPROVED BY THE
MATERIAL CLASS II OR OTHER
TO BE FILLED WITH GRANULAR
(SEE NOTES)
4" CONCRETE FILLER SLAB
FILLER (TYP)
‚" FIBER JOINT
WIDTH OF PIER
SLIP-FORMING (TYP)
2"< CLEARANCE FOR
3"
MIN.
3"
MIN.
8"
(TYP)
6"
(T
YP)
8"
(TYP)
6"
(T
YP)
E5 JOINT (TYP)
R-49-G
CONCRETE BARRIER
98
SEE NOTES
DOWEL (TYP) 4" DRAIN HOLE
4" DRAIN HOLE
SEE NOTES
DOWEL (TYP)
CONCRETE SHOULDER (TYP)
CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER OR
CONCRETE SHOULDER (TYP)
CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER OR
ENGINEER (SEE NOTES)
MATERIAL APPROVED BY THE
MATERIAL CLASS II OR OTHER
TO BE FILLED WITH GRANULAR
E5 JOINT (TYP)
42"
9"
MI
N.
9"
MI
N.
9"
MI
N.
42"
9"
MI
N.
9"
MI
N.
9"
MI
N.
2-24-2017
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
FOR VALLEY GUTTER DETAILS, SEE STANDARD PLAN R-33-SERIES.
BARRIER REFLECTOR MARKERS SHALL MATCH COLOR OF EDGE LINE.
2) 25'-0" ON CURVES WITH A RADIUS LESS THAN 1150'.
OR MORE.
1) 5O'-0" ON TANGENT SECTIONS AND CURVES WITH A RADIUS OF 1150'
BARRIER REFLECTOR MARKERS ARE TO BE SPACED AT THE FOLLOWING INTERVALS:
ADJACENT TO THE BARRIER WALL OR THE BASE FOR THE CONCRETE BARRIER.
INCLUDED IN THE PAYMENT FOR THE VALLEY GUTTER OR SHOULDER WHICH IS
E5 LONGITUDINAL JOINT WILL NOT BE PAID FOR SEPARATELY BUT SHALL BE
OF AT LEAST 4" AND SHALL BE EDGED.
MINIMUM. PLANE OF WEAKNESS JOINTS IN THE BARRIER SHALL BE TO A DEPTH
PLANE OF WEAKNESS JOINT SPACING SHALL BE 20'-0" MAXIMUM AND 10'-0"
ALIGNED WITH EXPANSION JOINTS IN BARRIER.
FOUNDATION). PLACE 1" EXPANSION JOINTS IN 4" CONCRETE FILLER SLAB,
LIGHT STANDARD FOUNDATIONS, BRIDGE PIERS, OR ANY STRUCTURE WITH A
ON BOTH ENDS OF ALL STRUCTURES (INCLUDING SIGN SUPPORT FOUNDATIONS,
BARRIERS. ALSO PLACE 1" EXPANSION JOINTS AT SPLIT SECTIONS AND
PLACE 1" EXPANSION JOINTS AT 400' INTERVALS IN BOTH TYPE A AND TYPE B
R-49-G
CONCRETE BARRIER
99
WILL BE PAID FOR AS "CONC BARRIER BACKFILL, CIP".
THE CLASS II GRANULAR MATERIAL USED IN FILLING SPLIT BARRIER SECTIONS
"SIDEWALK, CONC, 4 INCH".
INCH". THE ‚" FIBER JOINT FILLER SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE PAY ITEM
THE CONCRETE FILLER SLAB SHALL BE PAID FOR AS "SIDEWALK, CONC, 4
SPLIT ARE INCLUDED IN THE PAY ITEM "CONC BARRIER, SPLIT, TYPE ".
THE TAPERED SECTIONS AT THE BEGINNING AND END OF CONCRETE BARRIER,
CURVES, AND SHALL BE FREE OF HUMPS, SAGS, AND OTHER IRREGULARITIES.
WHEN CHECKED WITH A 10' STRAIGHTEDGE, EXCEPT AT GRADE CHANGES AND
THE TOP AND FACES OF THE BARRIER SHALL NOT VARY MORE THAN •" IN 10'
ATTENUATION DEVICE.
THE CLEAR ZONE, BY ENDING AT A STRUCTURE, OR BY UTILIZING AN IMPACT
TRAFFIC, SUCH AS BY CURVING IT AWAY FROM A TARGET POSITION BEYOND
BARRIER SHALL BE ENDED SO AS NOT TO PRESENT A HAZARD TO APPROACHING
ETC.).
SEPARATELY (FOR EXAMPLE: AS CONCRETE SHOULDER, CONCRETE BASE COURSE,
BASE FOR "CONCRETE BARRIER, DOUBLE FACE, TYPE B" WILL BE PAID FOR
INCLUDED IN THE PAY ITEM "CONC BARRIER, DOUBLE FACE, TYPE B". THE
SPACING MAY BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID CONFLICT WITH JOINTS. DOWELS ARE
DOWELS SHALL BE PLACED 3'-0" C-C ALONG EACH SIDE OF THE BARRIER.
THE PAY ITEM "CONC BARRIER, DOUBLE FACE, TYPE B". ON SPLIT SECTIONS,
SIDE TO SIDE (6'-0" C-C ALONG EACH SIDE). DOWELS ARE INCLUDED IN
DOWELS SHALL BE PLACED EVERY 3'-0" ALONG THE BARRIER ALTERNATING FROM
DOWEL PLACEMENT SHALL START 1'-6" FROM END OF STANDARD SECTION.
SHOULDER AND DOWELED WITH EPOXY COATED #6 DEFORMED BARS 1'-3" LONG.
PLANS, THE BARRIER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ON AN EXISTING BASE OR
WHEN "CONCRETE BARRIER, DOUBLE FACE, TYPE B" IS DESIGNATED ON THE
INCLUDED IN THE PAY ITEM "CONC BARRIER, DOUBLE FACE, TYPE A".
THE DOWELS, EXTRA WIDTH OF BASE, OR ANY EXTRA WORK REQUIRED WILL BE
BASE AS SPECIFIED FOR THE "CONCRETE BARRIER, DOUBLE FACE, TYPE B".
PLANS, THE BARRIER MAY BE CONSTRUCTED USING DOWELS AND A WIDENED
WHEN "CONCRETE BARRIER, DOUBLE FACE, TYPE A" IS DESIGNATED ON THE
NOTES:
2-24-2017
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVALCHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
Michigan Department of Transportation
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
APPROVED BY:
APPROVED BY:
Kirk T. Steudle
BY
PREPARED
DESIGN DIVISION
DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF FIELD SERVICES
DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT
12'-0" 8'-0"
6'-0"6'-0"
1'-8"
6'-0"
2'-8"
1'-4"
8"
A
A
PLAN
SIDE
1'-0"
8'-0"
8"
1'-8"
BOLT CIRCLE
1'-1" DIA.
1" EXPANSION JOINT (TYP)
(SEE STANDARD PLAN R-72-SERIES)
1" EXPANSION JOINT
END THE GLARE SCREEN AT THE
IS SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS,
WHERE CONCRETE GLARE SCREEN
(SEE STANDARD PLAN R-72-SERIES)
1" EXPANSION JOINT
END THE GLARE SCREEN AT THE
IS SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS,
WHERE CONCRETE GLARE SCREEN
ELEVATION
12'-0"
TRANSITION SECTION TRANSITION SECTION
B
B
C
C
B.L.T.
W.K.P. 1 6
LIGHT STANDARD FOUNDATION
R-50-G
28'-2"
VERTICAL WALL BARRIER SECTION
D
D
TY
PE
A
BA
RRI
ER
TY
PE
B
BA
RRI
ER
AND CONDUIT
\ OF BOLT CIRCLE
3'-6"
8"
R-49-SERIES
SEE STANDARD PLAN
E5 JOINT (TYP)
6'-0"
1'-6" R
1'-8" 1'-8"8"8" 1'-4"
1" R (TYP)
•" BEVEL OR
R-33-SERIES
SEE STANDARD PLAN
GUTTER (TYP)
CONCRETE VALLEY
CONDUIT
3" DIAMETER
1'-6"
MI
N.
1'-0"
3'-6"
8"
R-49-SERIES
SEE STANDARD PLAN
E5 JOINT (TYP)
6'-0"
1'-6" R
1'-8" 1'-8"8"8" 1'-4"
1" R (TYP)
•" BEVEL OR
R-33-SERIES
SEE STANDARD PLAN
GUTTER (TYP)
CONCRETE VALLEY
CONDUIT
3" DIAMETER
1'-6"
MI
N.
(TYPE A BARRIER)
SIDE(TYPE B BARRIER)
(CONCRETE BARRIER, DOUBLE FACE)
4-21-2017
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
A1 BARS3•
"
3•
"
3'-6"
1'-0"
4•
"4•
"1'-0"
1'-0"
1'-0"
1'-1•
"1'-1•
"
8"
6" 6"
3"
IN
BA
RRI
ER
WA
LL
A1
BA
RS
AT 5
EQ
UA
L
SP
AC
ES
3"
A1
BA
RS I
N
FO
OTI
NG
3"
3"
BA
RRI
ER
WA
LL
A1
BA
RS I
N
6" 6"
12'-0"6'-0"
SHOWING STEEL REINFORCEMENT
PLAN
SHOWING STEEL REINFORCEMENT
ELEVATION
6R-50-G
2
1'-0"
6" 6"1'-0"
1'-0"
6" 6"1'-0"A2 BARS AT 6" SPACING IN FOOTING A2 BARS AT 6" SPACING IN FOOTING
A2 BARS AT 6" SPACING IN FOOTING A2 BARS AT 6" SPACING IN FOOTING
D BARS AT 6" SPACING IN BARRIER WALL D BARS AT 6" SPACING IN BARRIER WALL
D BARS AT 6" SPACING IN BARRIER WALL D BARS AT 6" SPACING IN BARRIER WALL
LIGHT STANDARD FOUNDATION(CONCRETE BARRIER, DOUBLE FACE)
4-21-2017
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
8" 8"1'-4"
2'-8"
3'-6"
SECTION A-A
1" R (TYP)
•" BEVEL OR
8" 8"1'-4"
2'-8"
3'-6"
SECTION A-A
1" R (TYP)
•" BEVEL OR
(TYPE A BARRIER)
(TYPE B BARRIER)
3"
MIN.
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-33-SERIES
CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER (TYP)
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-33-SERIES
CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER (TYP)
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-49-SERIES
E5 JOINT (TYP)
MI
N.
9"
8"
(TYP)
6"
(T
YP)
DOWEL (TYP)
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-49-SERIES
E5 JOINT (TYP)
6R-50-G
3
LIGHT STANDARD FOUNDATION(CONCRETE BARRIER, DOUBLE FACE)
4-21-2017
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
2'-8"
1'-4" TO 2'-8"
VARIES
SECTION B-B
1" R (TYP)
•" BEVEL OR
3'-6"
FROM SINGLE SLOPE SHAPE TO VERTICAL WALL
UNIFORMLY TRANSITION THE BARRIER FACES
2'-8"
1'-4" TO 2'-8"
VARIES
1" R (TYP)
•" BEVEL OR
3'-6"
(TYPE A BARRIER)
SECTION B-B(TYPE B BARRIER)
FROM SINGLE SLOPE SHAPE TO VERTICAL WALL
UNIFORMLY TRANSITION THE BARRIER FACES
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-33-SERIES
CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER (TYP)
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-33-SERIES
CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER (TYP)
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-49-SERIES
E5 JOINT (TYP)
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-49-SERIES
E5 JOINT (TYP)
6"
(T
YP)
MI
N.
9"
8"
(TYP)
DOWEL (TYP)
6R-50-G
4
3" TO 0 (TYP)
* VARIES
OVER THE LENGTH OF THE TRANSITION SECTION
TO FLUSH WITH THE VERTICAL WALL BARRIER SECTION
THE FACE OF THE CONCRETE BARRIER, DOUBLE FACE
* UNIFORMLY TRANSITION E5 JOINT FROM 3" OUTSIDE
LIGHT STANDARD FOUNDATION(CONCRETE BARRIER, DOUBLE FACE)
4-21-2017
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
6R-50-G
5
GROUNDING ROD
8"
1'-6"
1'-6"
\ OF ANCHOR BOLT TIES
ANCHOR BOLT (TYP)
CONDUIT
3" DIAMETER
2'-8"
1" R (TYP)
•" BEVEL OR
3"
3"
A1
BA
RS
AT 5
EQ
UA
L
SP
AC
ES
3•
"
3•
"
1'-0"
4•" 4•"1'-0" 1'-0"1'-1•"1'-1•" 1'-0"
A1 BARS
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-33-SERIES
CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER (TYP)
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-49-SERIES
E5 JOINT (TYP)
3" 3"
SECTION C-C
A2 BARS AT 6" SPACING
2'-8"
1" R (TYP)
•" BEVEL OR
3"
3"
D BARS AT 6" SPACING
A1
BA
RS
AT 5
EQ
UA
L
SP
AC
ES
3•
"
3•
"
1'-0"
4•" 4•"1'-0" 1'-0"1'-1•"1'-1•" 1'-0"
A1 BARS
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-33-SERIES
CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER (TYP)
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-49-SERIES
E5 JOINT (TYP)
3" 3"
SECTION D-D
A2 BARS AT 6" SPACING
1'-6" SLACK ABOVE TOP OF BARRIER.
AS SPECIFIED IN THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. LEAVE
CONNECT THE GROUNDING CABLE TO THE GROUNDING ROD
LIGHT STANDARD FOUNDATION(CONCRETE BARRIER, DOUBLE FACE)
4-21-2017
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
BARSIZE
BARLENGTH
REQUIRED
NUMBER
(LBS)
WEIGHT
A1
A2
#5
#5
11'-6"
5'-6"
24
44
288
TOTAL WEIGHT OF STEEL = 730 LBS
STEEL REINFORCEMENT (EPOXY COATED)
252
D #4 6'-5" 44 190
4'-9"
D BAR
10"
(TYP)
6R-50-G
6
LENGTH
A BAR
MI
N.
2•
"
5•
"
MI
N.
2•
"
MI
N.
PR
OJ
EC
TI
ON
5•
"
1‚" DIAMETER STUD
FLUSH WITH TOP OF BARRIER
•" THICK WASHER (TYP.)
HEAVY HEX NUT (TYP.)
3"
MI
N.
TH
RE
AD
S
4'-2"
5…"
HEAT BEND 90° < 5°
R= 1"MIN. 3" MAX.
ANCHOR BOLT DETAIL
CONCRETE QUANTITIES
FOOTING 2.7 CYD
(TYPE A)
TRANSITION SECTIONS
4.9 CYD
5.9 CYD
6.2 CYD
LIGHT STANDARD FOUNDATION(CONCRETE BARRIER, DOUBLE FACE)
(TYPE B)
TRANSITION SECTIONS
VERTICAL WALL SECTION
4-21-2017
MATERIAL AS THE ANCHOR NUTS.
COUPLING MUST BE OF THE SAME
THIS PLAN.
TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON
MATERIALS FOR THE ELECTRICAL GROUNDING SYSTEM SHALL BE ACCORDING
APPLICABLE R-33-SERIES.
WORK THIS STANDARD WITH STANDARD PLAN R-49-SERIES AND WHEN
PLAN.
STANDARD FOUNDATION SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS DETAILED ON THIS
THE CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE LIGHT
TEMPLATE.
AT THE PROPER HEIGHT WITH THE ƒ" PLYWOOD (OR APPROVED EQUAL)
CAREFULLY SET AND HELD VERTICAL AT THE CORRECT LOCATION AND
(OR APPROVED EQUAL) TEMPLATE. THE ANCHOR BOLT BASKET SHALL BE
CIRCLES (OR APPROVED EQUAL) ALONG WITH SECURING A ƒ" PLYWOOD
BOLTS SHALL BE TIED TOGETHER INTO A BASKET BY WELDING #6 BAR
PRIOR TO BEING APPROVED FOR SHIPMENT, EACH SET OF FOUR ANCHOR
CURRENT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.
ANCHOR BOLTS, NUTS, AND WASHERS SHALL BE ACCORDING TO THE
1" RADIUS.
ALL EXPOSED EDGES ON THE BARRIER SHALL HAVE A •" BEVEL OR
"SINGLE SLOPE" SHAPE.
THE SIDE CONFIGURATION SPECIFIED ON THIS PLAN CONFORMS TO THE
NOTES:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVALCHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
Michigan Department of Transportation
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
APPROVED BY:
APPROVED BY:
Kirk T. Steudle
BY
PREPARED
DESIGN DIVISION
DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF FIELD SERVICES
DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT
8"1'-4" 8"8"8"
8"
1'-2"
3'-6"
R-49-SERIES
SEE STANDARD PLAN
E5 JOINT (TYP)
R-33-SERIES
SEE STANDARD PLAN
GUTTER (TYP)
CONCRETE VALLEY
1" R (TYP)
•" BEVEL OR
8"
1'-2"
3'-6"
R-49-SERIES
SEE STANDARD PLAN
E5 JOINT (TYP)
8"1'-4" 8"8"8"
1" R (TYP)
•" BEVEL OR
R-33-SERIES
SEE STANDARD PLAN
GUTTER (TYP)
CONCRETE VALLEY
K J K
N16'-0"
TRANSITION SECTION
16'-0"
TRANSITION SECTION2'-8"
GU
TT
ER
VA
LL
EY
CO
NC
RE
TE
GU
TT
ER
VA
LL
EY
CO
NC
RE
TE
2'-
0"
2'-
0"
VALLEY GUTTER (TYP)
FLOW LINE IN CONCRETE
MAINTAIN UNIFORM DEPTH OF
SUPPORT FOUNDATION (TYP)
SIDE APPROACHING THE SIGN
PLACE GLARE SCREEN ON THE
EDGE OF SHOULDER
EDGE OF SHOULDER
JOINT (TYP)
CONTRACTION
ANCHOR BOLTS (TYP)
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-49-SERIES
E5 JOINT (TYP)
(SEE STANDARD PLAN R-76-SERIES)
1" EXPANSION JOINT
END THE GLARE SCREEN AT THE
IS SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS,
WHERE CONCRETE GLARE SCREEN
PLAN
SIGN SUPPORT SECTION
L = LENGTH OF SIGN SUPPORT FOUNDATION
JOINT (TYP)
1 " EXPANSION
(SEE STANDARD PLAN R-76-SERIES)
1" EXPANSION JOINT
END THE GLARE SCREEN AT THE
IS SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS,
WHERE CONCRETE GLARE SCREEN
BA
RRI
ER
TY
PE
A
BA
RRI
ER
TY
PE
B
55'-2"
58'-2"
C
D
TYPE
SUPPORTJ K L N
6'-11"
8'-8" 8'-8"
8'-0•"
DIMENSIONS FOR SIGN SUPPORT FOUNDATIONS
23'-0"
26'-0"
GUTTER
VALLEY
CONCRETE
TOP OF
ELEVATION
10'-0" 10'-0"
(TYPE B BARRIER)(TYPE A BARRIER)
SIDE SIDE
N
SIGN SUPPORT SECTION
A B
A B
C
C
6R-51-E
1
(CONCRETE BARRIER, DOUBLE FACE)
SIGN SUPPORT FOUNDATION
4-21-2017
OF TRAVEL
DIRECTION
OF TRAVEL
DIRECTION
B.L.T.
W.K.P.
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
10'-0"
6"
6" 6"
C BARS 50 SPACES AT 6" = 25'-0" IN BARRIER WALL FOR SIGN SUPPORT D6" 6"
C BARS 44 SPACES AT 6" = 22'-0" IN BARRIER WALL FOR SIGN SUPPORT C
6"
6" 6"
6" 6"
A2 BARS 44 SPACES AT 6" = 22'-0" IN FOOTING FOR SIGN SUPPORT C
A2 BARS 50 SPACES AT 6" = 25'-0" IN FOOTING FOR SIGN SUPPORT D
3"
3"
WA
LL
IN
BA
RRI
ER
A1
BA
RS
6"
8"
12"
12"
12"
BA
RRI
ER
WA
LL
A1
BA
RS I
N
6" 6"
6" 6"
A2 BARS 44 SPACES AT 6" = 22'-0" IN FOOTING FOR SIGN SUPPORT C
A2 BARS 50 SPACES AT 6" = 25'-0" IN FOOTING FOR SIGN SUPPORT D
6" 6"
C BARS 50 SPACES AT 6" = 25'-0" IN BARRIER WALL FOR SIGN SUPPORT D6" 6"
C BARS 44 SPACES AT 6" = 22'-0" IN BARRIER WALL FOR SIGN SUPPORT C
A1 BARS
1'-2"
8"
3'-6"
4"
4"
SHOWING STEEL REINFORCEMENT
PLAN
SHOWING STEEL REINFORCEMENT
ELEVATION
6R-51-E
2
(CONCRETE BARRIER, DOUBLE FACE)
SIGN SUPPORT FOUNDATION
4-21-2017
A1
BA
RS
AT 1'-6"
SP
ACI
NG I
N
FO
OTI
NG
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
6R-51-E
3
(CONCRETE BARRIER, DOUBLE FACE)
SIGN SUPPORT FOUNDATION
(TYPE B BARRIER)
TRANSITION SECTION PLAN
CONCRETE BARRIER, DOUBLE FACE 16'-0"
TRANSITION SECTION
1'-4"
8"
8"
3"
VA
LL
EY
GU
TT
ER
CO
NC
RE
TE
2'-0"
2'-8"
VA
LL
EY
GU
TT
ER
CO
NC
RE
TE
2'-0"
SUPPORT FOUNDATION (TYP)
SIDE APPROACHING THE SIGN
PLACE GLARE SCREEN ON THE
EDGE OF SHOULDER
EDGE OF SHOULDER
JOINT (TYP)
1 " EXPANSION
JOINT (TYP)
CONTRACTION
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-49-SERIES
E5 JOINT (TYP)
THE LENGTH OF THE TRANSITION SECTION
TO FLUSH WITH THE SIGN SUPPORT SECTION OVER
THE FACE OF THE CONCRETE BARRIER, DOUBLE FACE
UNIFORMLY TRANSITION E5 JOINT FROM 3" OUTSIDE
4-21-2017
VALLEY GUTTER (TYP)
FLOW LINE IN CONCRETE
MAINTAIN UNIFORM DEPTH OF
SIGN SUPPORT SECTION
8" 1'-4"
2'-8"
8"
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-49-SERIES
E5 JOINT (TYP)
1" R (TYP)
•" BEVEL OR
3'-6"
SECTION A-A(TYPE A BARRIER)
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-33-SERIES
CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER (TYP)
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
6R-51-E
4
(CONCRETE BARRIER, DOUBLE FACE)
SIGN SUPPORT FOUNDATION
4-21-2017
8" 1'-4"
2'-8"
8"1" R (TYP)
•" BEVEL OR
3'-6"
3"
MIN.
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-49-SERIES
E5 JOINT (TYP)DOWEL (TYP)8"
(TYP)
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-33-SERIES
CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER (TYP)
MI
N.
9"
6"
(T
YP)
SECTION A-A(TYPE B BARRIER)
1'-4" TO 2'-8"
VARIES
1" R (TYP)
•" BEVEL OR
2'-8" TO 4'-0"
VARIES
2'-0" (TYP)
FLOW LINE
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-49-SERIES
E5 JOINT (TYP)
3'-6"
SECTION B-B(TYPE A BARRIER)
1'-4" TO 2'-8"
VARIES
1" R (TYP)
•" BEVEL OR
2'-8" TO 4'-0"
VARIES
3'-6"
DOWEL (TYP)8"
(TYP)
6"
(T
YP)
MI
N.
9"
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-49-SERIES
E5 JOINT (TYP)
SECTION B-B(TYPE B BARRIER)
3" TO 0 (TYP)
* VARIES
THE LENGTH OF THE TRANSITION SECTION
TO FLUSH WITH THE SIGN SUPPORT SECTION OVER
THE FACE OF THE CONCRETE BARRIER, DOUBLE FACE
* UNIFORMLY TRANSITION E5 JOINT FROM 3" OUTSIDE
2'-0" (TYP)
FLOW LINE
4
21
4
21
4
21
4
21
THE TRANSITION SECTION.
OF THE BARRIER THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF
MAINTAIN CONSTANT BARRIER SLOPE ON BOTH SIDES
NOTE:
6" 6"
4"
6"
4"
A2 BARS AT 6" SPACING
8"
12"
12"
12"
6"
A1
BA
RS I
N
BA
RRI
ER
WA
LL
1" R (TYP)
•" BEVEL OR
C BARS AT 6" SPACING
3" 3"
E E
ANCHOR BOLT (TYP)
FLOW LINE
2'-0" (TYP)
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-49-SERIES
E5 JOINT (TYP)
#6 BAR CIRCLE (TYP)
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
2'-8" 8"8"
4'-0"
SECTION C-C
F
F
E E
ANCHOR BOLT ALIGNMENT
ANCHOR BOLTS
TYPE
SUPPORT
SIGN
C
D
E F
9•"
9•"
2‚"
3"
ANCHOR BOLT ALIGNMENT
DIMENSIONS FOR
5'-3‚
"
5‚"
HEAT BEND 90° < 5°
R= 1"MIN. 3" MAX.
3"
MI
N.
2†
"8"
PR
OJ
EC
TI
ON
HEAVY HEX NUT (TYP)
1•" DIAMETER ANCHOR BOLT
WASHER (TYP)
TOP OF BARRIER
TH
RE
AD
S
8•
"
MI
N.
2'-7"
MUST BE SECURED IN PLACE.
ƒ" PLYWOOD TEMPLATE OR APPROVED EQUAL
TO ANCHOR BOLTS TO HOLD ALIGNMENT. A
#6 BAR CIRCLE OR APPROVED EQUAL WELDED
1•" DIAMETER ANCHOR BOLT
ANCHOR BOLT DETAIL6
R-51-E5
(CONCRETE BARRIER, DOUBLE FACE)
SIGN SUPPORT FOUNDATION
4-21-2017
A1 BARS AT 1'-6" SPACING IN FOOTING
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
BARSIZE
BARLENGTH
REQUIRED
NUMBER
(LBS)
WEIGHT
A1
A2
#5
#5
22'-2"
9'-2"
22
90
509
STEEL REINFORCEMENT (EPOXY COATED)
861
C #4 5'-6•" 90 334
TOTAL WEIGHT OF STEEL = 1,704 LBS
BARSIZE
BARLENGTH
REQUIRED
NUMBER
(LBS)
WEIGHT
A1
A2
#5
#5
25'-2"
9'-2"
22 578
976
C #4 5'-6•" 378
102
102
TOTAL WEIGHT OF STEEL = 1,932 LBS
(TYPE B)
SECTIONS
TRANSITION
SECTION
SUPPORT
SIGN
(TYPE A)
SECTIONS
TRANSITION
FOOTING
SUPPORT
SIGN
TYPE
SUPPORT
SIGN
14.5 CYD
14.5 CYD
13.7 CYD
13.7 CYD
12.3 CYD10.0 CYDC
13.9 CYD11.3 CYDD
CONCRETE QUANTITIES
3'-1"
C BAR
10‚"
LENGTH
A BAR
1'-6•
"
7‚"
3'-1ƒ"
6R-51-E
6
(CONCRETE BARRIER, DOUBLE FACE)
SIGN SUPPORT FOUNDATION
4-21-2017
SIGN SUPPORT TYPE C SIGN SUPPORT TYPE D
APPLICABLE R-33-SERIES AND R-76-SERIES.
WORK THIS STANDARD WITH STANDARD PLAN R-49-SERIES AND WHEN
IN FULL FOR ALL WORK AND MATERIALS.
THE CONTRACT UNIT PRICE PER LINEAR FEET, WHICH INCLUDES PAYMENT
PLAN, AND INCLUDED IN THEIR RESPECTIVE ITEMS AND PAID FOR AT
SUPPORT FOUNDATION SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS DETAILED ON THIS
THE CONCRETE GLARE SCREEN USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SIGN
MODIFICATIONS TO THE CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER AND LOCATION OF
BEING PLACED AS SPECIFIED ON THIS PLAN.
ENDS WITH THE 1" EXPANSION JOINTS USED TO GAP FOR STRUCTURES
SIGN SUPPORT FOUNDATION INCLUDES THE TRANSITION SECTION ON BOTH
BEING APPROVED FOR SHIPPING (SEE ANCHOR BOLT DETAIL).
A ƒ" PLYWOOD (OR APPROVED EQUAL) TEMPLATE IN PLACE PRIOR TO
WITH #6 BAR CIRCLES (OR APPROVED EQUAL) ALONG WITH SECURING
OF FOUR BOLTS SHALL BE TIED TOGETHER BY WELDING INTO A BASKET
(OR APPROVED EQUAL) TEMPLATE UNTIL CONCRETE IS SET. EACH SET
CORRECT LOCATION AND AT THE PROPER ELEVATION WITH ƒ" PLYWOOD
ANCHOR BOLTS SHALL BE CAREFULLY SET AND HELD VERTICAL AT THE
CURRENT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.
ANCHOR BOLTS, NUTS, AND WASHERS SHALL BE ACCORDING TO THE
RADIUS.
ALL EXPOSED EDGES ON THE BARRIER SHALL HAVE A •" BEVEL OR 1"
"SINGLE SLOPE" SHAPE.
THE SIDE CONFIGURATION SPECIFIED ON THIS PLAN CONFORMS TO THE
NOTES:
CONCRETE BARRIER, SINGLE FACE
SECTION B - B SECTION C - C
A
A
BC
C
(AT CIRCULAR COLUMN)
CONCRETE BARRIER, SINGLE FACE
(AT SQUARE COLUMN OR ABUTMENT)
CONCRETE BARRIER, SINGLE FACE
B
CONCRETE BARRIER, SINGLE FACE, TYPE A
(IN LINE WITH BRIDGE COLUMNS OR ABUTMENT)
SECTION A - A
R-54-I3-22-2017B.L.T.
W.K.P. 1 4
2'-4"
< 1"
2'-4"
< 1"
2'-4"
< 1"
3'-6"
8"
*
VARIES
3'-6"
*
ON PLANS
SPECIFIED
SLOPE AS
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
MARKER SEE CURRENT
BARRIER REFLECTOR
FILLER WALL
3"
NA
RR
OW
SH
OU
LD
ER
CONCRETE BARRIER, SINGLE FACE
(NORMAL SECTION)
CONTRACTION JOINT
CONCRETE BARRIER, SINGLE FACE, TYPE A
EDGE OF TRAVELED LANE (PAINT LINE)
1
12'-0" TRANSITION SECTION
(L
ES
S
TH
AN 12'-0")
1" EXPANSION JOINT
12'-0" TRANSITION SECTION
*3'-6"
OR ABUTMENT
BRIDGE COLUMN
8"1'-4"
2'-0"
(SEE PLANS)
SLOPE PAVING
GROUND SURFACE
ORIGINAL
OR ABUTMENT
COLUMN
BRIDGE
FOR MAXIMUM FLARE RATE
SEE CHART
FILLER WALL
COLUMN
BRIDGE
1" EXPANSION JOINT
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
MARKER SEE CURRENT
BARRIER REFLECTOR
(SEE NOTES)
UNDERDRAIN
(SEE NOTES)
UNDERDRAIN
(SEE NOTES)
UNDERDRAIN E5 JOINT
E5 JOINT E5 JOINT
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVALCHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
Michigan Department of Transportation
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
APPROVED BY:
APPROVED BY:
Kirk T. Steudle
BY
PREPARED
DESIGN DIVISION
DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF FIELD SERVICES
DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT
1'-4"VARIES 8" 16" 8"
32"
1" RADIUS (TYP)
•" BEVEL OR
3" WHICHEVER IS GREATER
VALLEY GUTTER/SHOULDER OR
* THICKNESS OF ADJACENT
ON PLANS
SPECIFIED
SLOPE AS
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
MARKER SEE CURRENT
BARRIER REFLECTOR
BARRIER FACE TO VERTICAL
UNIFORMLY TRANSITION
CONCRETE BARRIER, SINGLE FACE, TYPE B
(IN LINE WITH BRIDGE COLUMNS OR ABUTMENT)
(IN FRONT OF BRIDGE COLUMNS OR ABUTMENTS)
D
D
E
E
PLAN VIEW
SECTION E - ESECTION D - D
CONCRETE BARRIER, SINGLE FACE, TYPE B (SHOWN)
CONCRETE BARRIER, SINGLE FACE
2 4
* EPOXY COATED DOWEL BAR
BRIDGE COLUMNS
TOE OF SLOPE
CONCRETE BARRIER, SINGLE FACE
EDGE OF TRAVELED LANE (PAINT LINE)
1
12'-0"
MA
X.
8'-0"
MI
N.
TO
E
OF
SL
OP
E
7'-0" FOR 1:2 SLOPE
FOR MAXIMUM FLARE RATE
SEE CHART
NONREINFORCED CONCRETE SHOULDER (AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS)
8"
9"
3'-6"
(AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS)
8'-0" MIN. 12'-0" MAX.
OR ABUTMENT
BRIDGE COLUMN
OR ABUTMENT AND BARRIER
BETWEEN BRIDGE COLUMN
1" FIBER JOINT FILLER
2'-4"
+ 1"
DOWEL BAR
* EPOXY COATED
AVOID ANY CONFLICT.
FROM ANY TRANSVERSE JOINT: SPACING MAY BE ADJUSTED TO
OF THE BARRIER. SPACING SHALL BE NO CLOSER THAN 1'-6"
CONCRETE SHOULDER STARTING AT 1'-6" FROM THE BEGINNING
LONG SPACED AT 1'-6" WITH 6" EMBEDMENT IN FOOTING OR
EPOXY COATED DOWEL BARS SHALL BE #6 DEFORMED BARS 1'-3"
* NOTE:
(SEE NOTES)
UNDERDRAIN
BD JOINT
14'-0"
LA
NE
SH
OW
N
(P
AI
NT
LI
NE)
ED
GE
OF
TR
AV
EL
ED
LA
NE
12'-0"
LA
NE
SH
OW
N
(P
AI
NT
LI
NE)
ED
GE
OF
TR
AV
EL
ED
LA
NE
BD JOINT
9"
3"
E5 JOINT
E5 JOINT
R-54-I3-22-2017
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
2'-4"
< 1"
3'-6"
ON PLANS
SPECIFIED
SLOPE AS
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
MARKER SEE CURRENT
BARRIER REFLECTOR
8" 16" 8"
32"
1" RADIUS (TYP)
•" BEVEL OR
SPECIFI
ED ON
PLANS
1:2
OR AS
16" 8"
32"
SPECIFICATIONS
CURRENT STANDARD
MARKER SEE
BARRIER REFLECTOR
3"3"
16" 16"
32"
CONCRETE BARRIER, SINGLE FACE, TYPE C
(IN LINE WITH BRIDGE COLUMNS OR ABUTMENT)
FLARE CHART
CONCRETE BARRIER, SINGLE FACE, TYPE C
(WITH GUARDRAIL ENDING)
ELEVATION VIEW
CROSS SECTION VIEW
POST FOOTING
SECTION F - F
CONCRETE BARRIER, SINGLE FACE
F F
3'-0" MINIMUM8'-0" CENTERS (TYP.)
POST FOOTING (TYP.)
1'-0" DIAMETER CONCRETE
GUARDRAIL ANCHORAGE, BRIDGE, DETAIL T2 WITH GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINAL TYPE 1B
* GUARDRAIL ANCHORAGE, BRIDGE, DETAIL T1 WITH GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINAL TYPE 1T OR
1:20
1:18
1:16MAXIMUM 15' OFFSET.
DESIGN SPEED. THE FLARE RATE OF THE CONCRETE BARRIER IS LIMITED BY ITS LENGTH AND
THE MAXIMUM FLARE RATE IS THE LARGEST ALLOWABLE DEPARTURE ANGLE FOR THE SPECIFIED
TRANSITION CONCRETE BARRIER, SINGLE FACE TO MATCH SHAPE OF BRIDGE BARRIER RAILING.
SH
OU
LD
ER
1
EXPANSION JOINT
SEE CHART
FOR MAXIMUM FLARE RATE,
CONCRETE BARRIER, SINGLE FACE, TYPE C
(SEE STANDARD PLAN R-61-SERIES)
* GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINAL
(SEE STANDARD PLAN R-67-SERIES)
* GUARDRAIL ANCHORAGE, BRIDGE
EDGE OF TRAVELED LANE (PAINT LINE)
CONCRETE BARRIER, SINGLE FACE
FLARE RATE SAME AS
(SEE STANDARD PLAN R-32-SERIES)
BRIDGE APPROACH CURB & GUTTER DETAIL 1, 2, OR 3
(115' MINIMUM)
15'
MA
X.
RAILING
BRIDGE
< 1"
2'-4"
SHOULDER
TOP OF
JOINT SEE NOTES
DIA.
1'-0" DIA.
6‚"
(6) #3 TIE BARS
(5) #6 BARS
SEE CURRENT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
BARRIER REFLECTOR MARKER
1" RADIUS (TYP.)
•" BEVEL OR
8"
(P
AI
NT
LI
NE)
ED
GE
OF
TR
AV
EL
ED
LA
NE
3"
6"
5"
(5) #6 BARS 7'-0" LONG
SEE SECTION F - F
EQUALLY SPACED
(6) #3 TIE BARS
OR AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS
1:2 SLOPE
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
MARKER SEE CURRENT
BARRIER REFLECTOR
1:14
1:12
1:10
1:8
FLARE
MAXIMUM
(MPH)
DESIGN SPEED
70
60
55
50
45
40
30
3 4
DISTANCE AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS
R-54-I3-22-2017
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
8" 16"
2'-4"
< 1"
3'-6"
ON 8'-0" CENTERS FILLED WITH CONCRETE
1'-0" DIAMETER HOLE x 6'-0" DEEP
CURVES, AND SHALL BE FREE OF HUMPS, SAGS, AND OTHER IRREGULARITIES.
WHEN CHECKED WITH A 10' STRAIGHTEDGE, EXCEPT AT GRADE CHANGES AND
THE TOP AND FACES OF THE BARRIER SHALL NOT VARY MORE THAN •" IN 10'
IN THE SIDE SLOPE.
IN A CUT SECTION, THE CONCRETE BARRIER SHALL BE ENDED BY BURYING IT
2•" DEEP AND SHALL BE EDGED.
PLANE OF WEAKNESS JOINTS IN THE CONCRETE BARRIER SHALL BE AT LEAST
THE CONCRETE BARRIER.
JOINTS IN THE CONCRETE FOOTING SHALL COINCIDE WITH THE JOINTS IN
R-32-SERIES.
SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS AND CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO STANDARD PLAN
APPROACH CURB & GUTTER WILL BE EITHER DETAIL 1, 2, OR 3, AS
BE BUILT ACCORDING TO STANDARD PLAN R-61-SERIES. THE BRIDGE
TO STANDARD PLAN R-67-SERIES. THE GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINAL SHALL
TERMINAL TYPE 1B. THE GUARDRAIL ANCHORAGES SHALL BE BUILT ACCORDING
OR GUARDRAIL ANCHORAGE, BRIDGE, DETAIL T2 AND GUARDRAIL APPROACH
ANCHORAGE, BRIDGE, DETAIL T1 AND GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINAL TYPE 1T
IN FILL SECTIONS, THE CONCRETE BARRIER SHALL BE ENDED WITH GUARDRAIL
CONCRETE BARRIER, SINGLE FACE
BARRIER REFLECTOR MARKERS SHALL MATCH COLOR OF EDGE LINE.
THE SHOULDER.
OF WEAKNESS JOINT SPACING SHALL COINCIDE WITH CONTRACTION JOINTS IN
MINIMUM, EXCEPT WHEN THE BARRIER IS ON A CONCRETE SHOULDER. PLANE
PLANE OF WEAKNESS JOINT SPACING SHALL BE 20' MAXIMUM AND 10'
SHOULD BE ADJUSTED TO MATCH EXPANSION JOINTS IN THE SHOULDER.
OR ANY STRUCTURE WITH A FOUNDATION). LOCATION OF EXPANSION JOINTS
(INCLUDING SIGN SUPPORTS, LIGHT STANDARD FOUNDATIONS, BRIDGE PIERS,
400' INTERVALS. ALSO PLACE 1" EXPANSION JOINTS AT STRUCTURES
PLACE 1" EXPANSION JOINTS IN THE CONCRETE BARRIER AT APPROXIMATELY
44R-54-I3-22-2017
IT. THE REMAINDER OF THE FILL CAN BE TYPICAL BACKFILL MATERIAL.
MATERIAL MUST BE PLACED AROUND THE UNDERDRAIN AND AT LEAST 12" ABOVE
FOUNDATION UNDERDRAIN WRAPPED WITH GEOTEXTILE. CLASS IIAA GRANULAR
ELEVATION OF THE TOP OF SHOULDER, IS A MINIMUM 4" DIAMETER
THE UNDERDRAIN, LOCATED BEHIND THE CONCRETE BARRIER AND AT THE
SLOPE SHAPE AS SPECIFIED ON STANDARD PLAN R-49-SERIES.
THE SIDE CONFIGURATION SPECIFIED ON THIS PLAN CONFORMS TO THE SINGLE
NOTES:
2) 25'-0" ON CURVES WITH A RADIUS LESS THAN 1150'.
OR MORE.
1) 5O'-0" ON TANGENT SECTIONS AND CURVES WITH A RADIUS OF 1150'
INTERVALS:
BARRIER REFLECTOR MARKERS ARE TO BE SPACED AT THE FOLLOWING
INCLUDED IN THE PAY ITEM "CONC BARRIER, SINGLE FACE, TYPE A".
THE DOWELS, EXTRA WIDTH OF BASE, OR ANY EXTRA WORK REQUIRED WILL BE
BASE AS SPECIFIED FOR THE "CONCRETE BARRIER, SINGLE FACE, TYPE B".
PLANS, THE BARRIER MAY BE CONSTRUCTED USING DOWELS AND A WIDENED
WHEN "CONCRETE BARRIER, SINGLE FACE, TYPE A" IS DESIGNATED ON THE
THE ROAD PLANS.
FOR DETAILS OF THE SHOULDER SECTION, SEE TYPICAL CROSS-SECTIONS IN
NO BACKFILL TO SUPPORT THE BACK SIDE OF THE BARRIER WALL.
TYPE C IS CONCRETE BARRIER PLACED ON CONCRETE POST FOOTINGS, WITH
DOWELED TO NONREINFORCED CONCRETE SHOULDERS OR TO A SEPARATE BASE;
MONOLITHIC WITH CONCRETE FOOTINGS; TYPE B IS CONCRETE BARRIER
"CONCRETE BARRIER, SINGLE FACE, TYPE A" IS CONCRETE BARRIER CAST
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
1"
1"
RUBBER-ASPHALT
HOT POURED
JOINT FILLER
1" FIBER
E5 JOINT DETAIL
1
TYP.
2'-0"
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
PO
ST
EL
EV
ATIO
N
8
1
(MAX.)6
5
4
2
8
OF
TR
AF
FI
C
DI
RE
CTI
ON
9
9
3
9
SH
OU
LD
ER
HI
NG
E
POI
NT
VARIABLE
OF
TR
AF
FI
C
DI
RE
CTI
ON
64
35
PL
AN
VIE
W
21
GU
AR
DR
AIL
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMIN
AL
TY
PE
1B
7
7
(Z)
(X)
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
LE
NG
TH
OF
NE
ED
CO
NC
ER
N
AR
EA
OF
DO
WN
ST
RE
AM
OF
SL
OT
S (
TY
P.)
SH
AL
L
BE
PO
SI
TI
ON
ED I
MM
EDI
AT
EL
Y
DE
FL
EC
TO
R
AN
GL
E
OF
SL
OT
GU
AR
D
OU
TSI
DE
ED
GE
OF
TR
AV
EL
ED
LA
NE
SH
EE
T
3
SE
E
EN
D
AN
CH
OR
AG
E
AS
SE
MB
LY,
(A
FL
AR
E I
S I
LL
US
TR
AT
ED)
OF
TH
E
ST
AN
DA
RD
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
SE
CTI
ON.
FA
CE
OF
TH
E
LA
ST
TW
O
OF
FS
ET
BL
OC
KS
TA
NG
EN
T
LI
NE
PR
OJ
EC
TE
D
FR
OM
TH
E
1
TH
RO
UG
H
9
FO
R
DE
TAI
LS
OF
PO
ST
S
SE
E
SH
EE
TS
4
AN
D
5
NO
TE:
1:10 SLOPE
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L
TY
PE
1B (
SR
T)
OPTION 1
"S
RT"
DO
NO
T
AT
TA
CH
TH
E
BE
AM
EL
EM
EN
T
TO
PO
ST
S
7
AN
D
8
4'-0"
37'-
6"
PA
RA
BO
LI
C
FL
AR
E
2
SP
AC
ES
AT
6'-
3"
6
SP
AC
ES
AT
4'-
2"
B.L.T.
W.K.P. 1 15R-61-H
8
**
FO
R
LA
YO
UT
ON
CU
RV
ES
SE
E
DE
TAI
L
ON
SH
EE
T
14.
(DETAILED ON SHEETS 1 THROUGH 7, 12 AND 13)
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8 *
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
B
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L
TY
PE 1
B
LA
YO
UT
TO
TR
AN
SI
TI
ON
FR
OM
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8
TO
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
*
SE
E
ST
AN
DA
RD
PL
AN
R-6
0-
SE
RI
ES
FO
R
PO
ST
SP
ACI
NG
AN
D
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
IN
FO
RM
ATI
ON)
FO
R
TY
PE
MG
S-8
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
HEI
GH
T
(S
EE
ST
AN
DA
RD
PL
AN
R-6
0-
SE
RI
ES
28"
TY
PE
B
52"
37•
"
33‚
"
26
ƒ"
21•
"
17
…"
14
…"
12
†"
12"
BE
AM
EL
EM
EN
T
AT
EA
CH
PO
ST
LO
CA
TI
ON.
PO
ST
S
AR
E
TO
BE
SE
T
AP
PR
OXI
MA
TE
LY
TA
NG
EN
T
TO
TH
E
TO
CE
NT
ER
OF
PO
ST)
(F
RO
M
TA
NG
EN
T
LI
NE
OF
FS
ET
DI
ST
AN
CE
**
PO
ST
(SRT & FLEAT)
TERMINAL TYPES 1B & 1T
GUARDRAIL APPROACH
1-24-2018
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVALCHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
Michigan Department of Transportation
DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF FIELD SERVICES
APPROVED BY:
APPROVED BY:
Kirk T. Steudle
BY
PREPARED
DESIGN DIVISION
1
TYP.
2'-0"
EL
EV
ATIO
N
34"
32"
GU
AR
DR
AIL
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMIN
AL
TY
PE
1T
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
T
(X)
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
LE
NG
TH
OF
NE
ED
CO
NC
ER
N
AR
EA
OF
HEI
GH
T
TR
AN
SI
TI
ON
TR
AN
SI
TI
ON
TH
RI
E
BE
AM
8
1
(MAX.)
6
2
8
OF
TR
AF
FI
C
DI
RE
CTI
ON
9
3S
HO
UL
DE
R
HI
NG
E
POI
NT
VARIABLE
OF
TR
AF
FI
C
DI
RE
CTI
ON
PL
AN
VIE
W
7
(Z)
DO
WN
ST
RE
AM
OF
SL
OT
S (
TY
P.)
SH
AL
L
BE
PO
SI
TI
ON
ED I
MM
EDI
AT
EL
Y
DE
FL
EC
TO
R
AN
GL
E
OF
SL
OT
GU
AR
D
OU
TSI
DE
ED
GE
OF
TR
AV
EL
ED
LA
NE
SH
EE
T
3
SE
E
EN
D
AN
CH
OR
AG
E
AS
SE
MB
LY,
1:10 SLOPE
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L
TY
PE
1T (
SR
T)
"S
RT"
5
4
DO
NO
T
AT
TA
CH
TH
E
BE
AM
EL
EM
EN
T
TO
PO
ST
S
7
AN
D
8
4'-0"
37'-
6"
PA
RA
BO
LI
C
FL
AR
E
37'-
6"
6'-
3"
2
SP
AC
ES
AT
6'-
3"
6
SP
AC
ES
AT
4'-
2"
89
64
35
21
7
1
TH
RO
UG
H
9
FO
R
DE
TAI
LS
OF
PO
ST
S
SE
E
SH
EE
TS
4
AN
D
5
NO
TE:
28"
(A
FL
AR
E I
S I
LL
US
TR
AT
ED)
OF
TH
E
ST
AN
DA
RD
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
SE
CTI
ON.
FA
CE
OF
TH
E
LA
ST
TW
O
OF
FS
ET
BL
OC
KS
TA
NG
EN
T
LI
NE
PR
OJ
EC
TE
D
FR
OM
TH
E
2R-61-H
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
PO
ST
9
**
FO
R
LA
YO
UT
ON
CU
RV
ES
SE
E
DE
TAI
L
ON
SH
EE
T
14.
52"
37•
"
33‚
"
26
ƒ"
21•
"
17
…"
14
…"
12
†"
12"
BE
AM
EL
EM
EN
T
AT
EA
CH
PO
ST
LO
CA
TI
ON.
PO
ST
S
AR
E
TO
BE
SE
T
AP
PR
OXI
MA
TE
LY
TA
NG
EN
T
TO
TH
E
15
TO
CE
NT
ER
OF
PO
ST)
(F
RO
M
TA
NG
EN
T
LI
NE
OF
FS
ET
DI
ST
AN
CE
**
PO
ST
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
(SRT & FLEAT)
TERMINAL TYPES 1B & 1T
GUARDRAIL APPROACH
1-24-2018
28"
2"
GROUND LINE
ELEVATION
PLAN VIEW
2 - 1" DIA. HEX NUTS
SLOTTED BEARING PLATE
3"
SOIL PLATE SOIL PLATE
(FIELD BEND TO FIT)
BEAM ELEMENT
(SEE SHEET 6 FOR DETAIL)
SLOT GUARD
END ANCHORAGE ASSEMBLY
PLATE WASHER
(SRT)
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-66-SERIES
TERMINAL END SHOE, TYPE B
(SEE SHEET 6 FOR DETAIL)
CABLE ANCHOR PLATE1'-0"
6'-3"
IN 2•" DIA. HOLE
PLACE POST SLEEVE
\ 2•" DIA. HOLE
STRUT
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
3R-61-H
CABLE ASSEMBLYCABLE ANCHOR PLATE SLOT GUARD STRUT
NOTES:
EACH END OF THE CABLE SO THAT THE CABLE WILL NOT LOOSEN.
AFTER THE CABLE ASSEMBLY IS TAUT, A SECOND NUT SHALL BE INSTALLED ON
THE STEEL SLEEVE (SOIL TUBE) AND THE WOOD BREAKAWAY POST.
ASPHALT ROOFING CEMENT SHALL BE USED TO SEAL THE PERIMETER AREA BETWEEN
15
2 - 1" DIA. HEX NUTS
(SEE SHEET 12 FOR DETAIL)
CABLE ASSEMBLY
(SRT & FLEAT)
TERMINAL TYPES 1B & 1T
GUARDRAIL APPROACH
1-24-2018
22"
GROUND LINE
SOIL PLATE
22"
BEAM ELEMENT
PLATE WASHER
STEEL SLEEVE
BEAM ELEMENT
CABLE ASSEMBLY
POST 1 DETAIL
SIDEELEVATION
POST 2 DETAIL
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES
POST BOLT, WASHER AND NUT
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES
POST BOLT, WASHER AND NUT
GROUND LINE
SOIL PLATE
STEEL SLEEVE
SLOTTED BEARING PLATE
GROUND
2 - 1" DIA. HEX NUTS
(SRT)
(SRT)
(ATTACH TO POST)
BEAM ELEMENT
TERMINAL END SHOE, TYPE B
SHOE, TYPE B
TERMINAL END
(ATTACH TO POST)
BEAM ELEMENT
DIA. HOLE (TYP.)
HEAD BOLT WITH NUT THROUGH ƒ"
PLACE †" DIA. x 7•" LONG HEX
4'-
4"
5•" x 7•" WOOD BREAKAWAY POST
5•" x 7•" WOOD BREAKAWAY POST
DIA. HOLE (TYP.)
HEAD BOLT WITH NUT THROUGH ƒ"
PLACE †" DIA. x 7•" LONG HEX
4'-
4"
(SEE NOTES)
ROOFING CEMENT
SEAL WITH ASPHALT
(SEE NOTES)
ROOFING CEMENT
SEAL WITH ASPHALT
STRUT
YOKE
YOKE
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
4R-61-H
THE STEEL SLEEVE (SOIL TUBE) AND THE WOOD BREAKAWAY POST.
ASPHALT ROOFING CEMENT SHALL BE USED TO SEAL THE PERIMETER AREA BETWEEN
EACH END OF THE CABLE SO THAT THE CABLE WILL NOT LOOSEN.
AFTER THE CABLE ASSEMBLY IS TAUT, A SECOND NUT SHALL BE INSTALLED ON
NOTES:
15
IN 2•" DIA. HOLE
PLACE CABLE SLEEVE
SOIL PLATE
DIA. HOLE (TYP.)
WASHER EACH SIDE THROUGH ƒ"
HEAD BOLT WITH NUT AND ROUND
PLACE †" DIA. x 10" LONG HEX
DIA. HOLE (TYP.)
WASHER EACH SIDE THROUGH ƒ"
HEAD BOLT WITH NUT AND ROUND
PLACE †" DIA. x 10" LONG HEX
"SRT" TO KEEP THE PLATE FROM ROTATING.
POST THROUGH THE HOLES IN THE SLOTTED BEARING PLATE ON POST 1 OF THE
TWO 3" LONG, 16D HOT-DIP ZINC COATED NAILS SHALL BE DRIVEN INTO THE WOOD
COATED NAILS (SEE NOTES)
3" LONG, 16D HOT-DIP ZINC
FACTORY INSTALLED STEEL BAND
FACTORY INSTALLED STEEL BAND
(SRT & FLEAT)
TERMINAL TYPES 1B & 1T
GUARDRAIL APPROACH
1-24-2018
GROUND LINE
22"
22"
(DO NOT ATTACH TO POST)
BEAM ELEMENT
22"
GROUND LINE
(ATTACH TO POST)
BEAM ELEMENT
POST 3 AND 6 DETAIL
R-60-SERIES
SEE STANDARD PLAN
POST BOLT, WASHER AND NUT
R-60-SERIES
SEE STANDARD PLAN
POST BOLT, WASHER AND NUT
GROUND LINE
R-60-SERIES
SEE STANDARD PLAN
POST BOLT, WASHER AND NUT
(SRT) (SRT)
(SRT)
(ATTACH TO POST)
BEAM ELEMENT
POST 4 AND 5 DETAIL
POST 7 AND 8 DETAIL
6" x 8" CRT POST
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES
6" x 8" WOOD OFFSET BLOCK
6" x 8" CRT POST
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES
6" x 8" WOOD OFFSET BLOCK
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES
6" x 8" WOOD OFFSET BLOCK
6" x 8" CRT POST
WITH HEX NUT (TYP.)
LONG SPLICE BOLT
†" DIA. x 1‚"
LAP GUARDRAIL WITH
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
5R-61-H
15
POST 9 IS A STANDARD LINE POST.
NOTE:
LONG MINIMUM
ZINC COATED NAILS, 16D, 3"
TO WOOD POST WITH 2 HOT-DIP
TOE NAIL WOOD OFFSET BLOCK
LONG MINIMUM
ZINC COATED NAILS, 16D, 3"
TO WOOD POST WITH 2 HOT-DIP
TOE NAIL WOOD OFFSET BLOCK
LONG MINIMUM
ZINC COATED NAILS, 16D, 3"
TO WOOD POST WITH 2 HOT-DIP
TOE NAIL WOOD OFFSET BLOCK
(SRT & FLEAT)
TERMINAL TYPES 1B & 1T
GUARDRAIL APPROACH
1-24-2018
ASSEMBLY
CABLE
BEAM ELEMENTHEX NUT (TYP.)
ONE PIECE ANCHOR PLATE
PLATE WASHERSLOTTED BEARING PLATE
SLOT GUARD DETAILS
BEAM ELEMENT
HEX NUT (TYP.)
CABLE ANCHOR PLATE DETAILS
1" DIA. WASHER
•" R
2ƒ"
1ƒ" DIA. HOLE (TYP.)
ON FRONT FACE THROUGH ƒ"
HEXHEAD BOLT WITH WASHER
PLACE †" DIA. x 1•" LONG
THROUGH ƒ" DIA. HOLE (TYP.)
SPLICE BOLT WITH HEXNUT
PLACE †" DIA. x 1‚" LONG
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
6R-61-H
SLOT GUARD **
ADJACENT SLOTS AND POST 1.
ANGLE GAP OPENS IN THE DIRECTION FACING THE
** PLACE THE SLOT GUARD SO THAT THE DEFLECTOR
THE ELONGATED SLOTS.
ON THE DOWNSTREAM END (AWAY FROM POST 1) OF
SO THAT THE SLOT GUARD ATTACHMENT HOLES ARE
THE ORDER AND ORIENTATION DETAILED ABOVE
* INSTALL THE SLOTTED RAIL BEAM ELEMENTS IN
NOTES:
MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.
ALL "SRT" ITEMS ILLUSTRATED WITHOUT DIMENSIONS SHALL BE ACCORDING TO THE
15
SLOT GUARD ASSEMBLY DETAIL **
(SRT)
(SRT)(SRT)
(SRT)
(SRT)
(POST 1 THROUGH 3)
POST 1POST 2POST 3
(POST 3 THROUGH 6)
POST 3POST 4POST 6
POST 5
(SRT)
(SRT)
(SRT)
POST 6POST 7POST 8POST 9
(POST 6 THROUGH 9)
SLOTTED RAIL BEAM ELEMENT #1 *
SLOTTED RAIL BEAM ELEMENT #2 *
…" 4"
3"
BEAM ELEMENT #3
2 - 1" DIA. HEX NUTS
1" DIA. STUD AND
CABLE ANCHOR PLATE
(SRT & FLEAT)
TERMINAL TYPES 1B & 1T
GUARDRAIL APPROACH
1-24-2018
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
7R-61-H
STRUT AND YOKE ASSEMBLY
8„"‰" ‰" 1"
2"
5•
"
2"
TYP.
‚"
‚"
STRUT YOKE
YOKE DETAIL STRUT DETAIL
ASSEMBLY DETAIL
YOKE
Š" R
4"
‡" x 2" SLOT
6"
1" R
C6 x 8.2 CHANNEL SECTION
5'-7‚"
(SRT)
15
(SRT & FLEAT)
TERMINAL TYPES 1B & 1T
GUARDRAIL APPROACH
1-24-2018
EL
EV
ATIO
N
OF
TR
AF
FI
C
DI
RE
CTI
ON
PL
AN
VIE
W
TYP.
78
61
2
GU
AR
DR
AIL
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMIN
AL
TY
PE
1B
(X)
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
LE
NG
TH
OF
NE
ED
CO
NC
ER
N
AR
EA
OF
OPTION 2
1:10 SLOPE
8
1
54
3
"F
LE
AT"G
UA
RD
RAI
L
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L
TY
PE
1B (
FL
EA
T)
(Z)
SH
OU
LD
ER
HI
NG
E
POI
NT
(MAX.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
VARIABLE
OF
TR
AF
FI
C
DI
RE
CTI
ON
(A
FL
AR
E I
S I
LL
US
TR
AT
ED)
OF
TH
E
ST
AN
DA
RD
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
SE
CTI
ON.
FA
CE
OF
TH
E
LA
ST
TW
O
OF
FS
ET
BL
OC
KS
TA
NG
EN
T
LI
NE
PR
OJ
EC
TE
D
FR
OM
TH
E
OU
TSI
DE
ED
GE
OF
TR
AV
EL
ED
LA
NE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
PO
ST
4'-0"
2
PO
ST
SP
AC
ES
AT
6'-
3"
3
PO
ST
SP
AC
ES
AT
4'-
2"
37'-
6"
ST
RAI
GH
T
FL
AR
E
2
PO
ST
SP
AC
ES
AT
6'-
3"
2'-0"
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
8R-61-H
(DETAILED ON SHEETS 8 THROUGH 13)
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8 *
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
B
IN
FO
RM
ATI
ON)
FO
R
TY
PE
MG
S-8
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
HEI
GH
T
(S
EE
ST
AN
DA
RD
PL
AN
R-6
0-
SE
RI
ES
28"
TY
PE
B
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L
TY
PE 1
B
LA
YO
UT
TO
TR
AN
SI
TI
ON
FR
OM
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8
TO
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
*
SE
E
ST
AN
DA
RD
PL
AN
R-6
0-
SE
RI
ES
FO
R
PO
ST
SP
ACI
NG
AN
D
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
52"
44"
44"
38•
"
33
Š"
28"
20"
12"
**
FO
R
LA
YO
UT
ON
CU
RV
ES
SE
E
DE
TAI
L
ON
SH
EE
T
14.
BE
AM
EL
EM
EN
T
AT
EA
CH
PO
ST
LO
CA
TI
ON.
PO
ST
S
AR
E
TO
BE
SE
T
AP
PR
OXI
MA
TE
LY
TA
NG
EN
T
TO
TH
E
DO
NO
T
AT
TA
CH
TH
E
BE
AM
EL
EM
EN
T
TO
PO
ST
S
1
AN
D
3
15
TO
CE
NT
ER
OF
PO
ST)
(F
RO
M
TA
NG
EN
T
LI
NE
OF
FS
ET
DI
ST
AN
CE
**
PO
ST
1
TH
RO
UG
H
8
FO
R
DE
TAI
LS
OF
PO
ST
S
SE
E
SH
EE
TS
10
AN
D
11
NO
TE:
(SRT & FLEAT)
TERMINAL TYPES 1B & 1T
GUARDRAIL APPROACH
1-24-2018
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
9R-61-H
34"
EL
EV
ATIO
N
OF
TR
AF
FI
C
DI
RE
CTI
ON
PL
AN
VIE
W
TYP.
GU
AR
DR
AIL
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMIN
AL
TY
PE
1T
(X)
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
LE
NG
TH
OF
NE
ED
CO
NC
ER
N
AR
EA
OF
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
T
1:10 SLOPE
8
1
"F
LE
AT"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L
TY
PE
1T (
FL
EA
T)
(Z)
(MAX.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
32"
TR
AN
SI
TI
ON
TH
RI
E
BE
AM
HEI
GH
T
TR
AN
SI
TI
ON
SH
OU
LD
ER
HI
NG
E
POI
NT
VARIABLE
OF
TR
AF
FI
C
DI
RE
CTI
ON
(A
FL
AR
E I
S I
LL
US
TR
AT
ED)
OF
TH
E
ST
AN
DA
RD
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
SE
CTI
ON.
FA
CE
OF
TH
E
LA
ST
TW
O
OF
FS
ET
BL
OC
KS
TA
NG
EN
T
LI
NE
PR
OJ
EC
TE
D
FR
OM
TH
E
OU
TSI
DE
ED
GE
OF
TR
AV
EL
ED
LA
NE
4'-0"
2
PO
ST
SP
AC
ES
AT
6'-
3"
3
PO
ST
SP
AC
ES
AT
4'-
2"
2
PO
ST
SP
AC
ES
AT
6'-
3"
6'-
3"
37'-
6"
37'-
6"
ST
RAI
GH
T
FL
AR
E
2'-0"
78
61
25
43
28"
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
PO
ST
52"
44"
44"
38•
"
33
Š"
28"
20"
12"
**
FO
R
LA
YO
UT
ON
CU
RV
ES
SE
E
DE
TAI
L
ON
SH
EE
T
14.
BE
AM
EL
EM
EN
T
AT
EA
CH
PO
ST
LO
CA
TI
ON.
PO
ST
S
AR
E
TO
BE
SE
T
AP
PR
OXI
MA
TE
LY
TA
NG
EN
T
TO
TH
E
DO
NO
T
AT
TA
CH
TH
E
BE
AM
EL
EM
EN
T
TO
PO
ST
S
1
AN
D
3
15
TO
CE
NT
ER
OF
PO
ST)
(F
RO
M
TA
NG
EN
T
LI
NE
OF
FS
ET
DI
ST
AN
CE
**
PO
ST
1
TH
RO
UG
H
8
FO
R
DE
TAI
LS
OF
PO
ST
S
SE
E
SH
EE
TS
10
AN
D
11
NO
TE:
(SRT & FLEAT)
TERMINAL TYPES 1B & 1T
GUARDRAIL APPROACH
1-24-2018
28"
2"
GROUND LINE
3"
POST 1 DETAIL
SIDE
22"
GROUND LINE
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES
POST BOLT, WASHER AND NUT
POST 2 DETAIL
ELEVATION SIDE
STRUT
22"
GROUND LINESTRUT
IMPACT HEAD ASSEMBLY
STEEL SLEEVE
SOIL PLATE
(FLEAT)
CABLE ASSEMBLY
(FLEAT)
SOIL PLATE
STEEL SLEEVE
ELEVATION
STRUT 2 - 1" DIA. HEX NUTS
IMPACT HEAD ASSEMBLY
TO POST)
(DO NOT ATTACH
BEAM ELEMENT
(ATTACH TO POST)
BEAM ELEMENT
4'-
4" DIA. HOLE (TYP.)
HEAD BOLT WITH NUT THROUGH ƒ"
PLACE †" DIA. x 7•" LONG HEX
DIA. HOLE (TYP.)
HEAD BOLT WITH NUT THROUGH ƒ"
PLACE †" DIA. x 7•" LONG HEX
4'-
4"
\ 2•" DIA. HOLE
CABLE ASSEMBLY
(SEE NOTES)
ROOFING CEMENT
SEAL WITH ASPHALT
STRUT
(SEE NOTES)
ROOFING CEMENT
SEAL WITH ASPHALT
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
10R-61-H
THE STEEL SLEEVE (SOIL TUBE) AND THE WOOD BREAKAWAY POST.
ASPHALT ROOFING CEMENT SHALL BE USED TO SEAL THE PERIMETER AREA BETWEEN
DIA. HOLE (TYP.)
WASHER EACH SIDE THROUGH ƒ"
HEAD BOLT WITH NUT AND ROUND
PLACE †" DIA. x 10" LONG HEX
DIA. HOLE (TYP.)
WASHER EACH SIDE THROUGH ƒ"
HEAD BOLT WITH NUT AND ROUND
PLACE †" DIA. x 10" LONG HEX
LAG SCREWS
…" DIA. x 3" LONG
15
NOTES:
EACH END OF THE CABLE SO THAT THE CABLE WILL NOT LOOSEN.
AFTER THE CABLE ASSEMBLY IS TAUT, A SECOND NUT SHALL BE INSTALLED ON
IN 2•" DIA. HOLE
PLACE CABLE SLEEVE
SOIL PLATE
SOIL PLATE
5•" x 7•" WOOD BREAKAWAY POST
5•" x 7•" WOOD BREAKAWAY POST
(SEE SHEET 11 FOR DETAIL)
CABLE ANCHOR BRACKET
PREVENT PLATE ROTATION
ZINC COATED NAILS TO
TWO 3" LONG, 16D HOT-DIP
SEE DETAIL SHEET 11.
WITH 5" DIMENSION UP.
BEARING PLATE INSTALLED
1" DIA. WASHER
(SRT & FLEAT)
TERMINAL TYPES 1B & 1T
GUARDRAIL APPROACH
1-24-2018
22"
GROUND LINE
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES
POST BOLT, WASHER AND NUT
22"
GROUND LINE
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES
POST BOLT, WASHER AND NUT
POST 3 DETAIL(FLEAT) (FLEAT)
POST 4 THROUGH 7 DETAIL
(ATTACH TO POST)
BEAM ELEMENT
TO BLOCK)
(DO NOT ATTACH
BEAM ELEMENT
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES
6" x 8" WOOD OFFSET BLOCK
6" x 8" CRT POST6" x 8" CRT POST
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES
6" x 8" WOOD OFFSET BLOCK
AND HEX NUT (TYP.)
LONG SPLICE BOLT
†" DIA. x 1‚"
ASSEMBLY
CABLE
2 - HEX NUTS
1" DIA. STUD AND HEX NUT (TYP.)
CABLE ANCHOR BRACKET
CABLE ANCHOR BRACKET DETAIL(FLEAT)
1" DIA. WASHER
CABLE ANCHOR BRACKET
BEARING PLATE
8"
4"
5"
8"
1ˆ" DIA. HOLE†" THICK PLATE
(FLEAT)
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
11R-61-H
BEAM ELEMENT
WASHERS (TYP.)
WASHER ON EACH SIDE (TYP.)
WITH SHOULDER BOLT
CABLE ANCHOR BRACKET
•" DIA. x 1‚" LONG
NOTES:
THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.
ALL "FLEAT" ITEMS ILLUSTRATED WITHOUT DIMENSIONS SHALL BE ACCORDING TO
POST 8 IS A STANDARD LINE POST.
15
(POST 1 THROUGH 3)
(POST 3 THROUGH 6)
POST 3POST 4POST 6 POST 5
(POST 6 THROUGH 8)
(FLEAT)
POST 1POST 2POST 3
(FLEAT)
(FLEAT)
BEAM ELEMENT #1 (SLOTTED RAIL)
POST 6POST 8 POST 2
BEAM ELEMENT #2 WITH 4 POST BOLT SLOTS
BEAM ELEMENT #3 WITH 3 POST BOLT SLOTS
LONG MINIMUM
ZINC COATED NAILS, 16D, 3"
TO WOOD POST WITH 2 HOT-DIP
TOE NAIL WOOD OFFSET BLOCK
LONG MINIMUM
ZINC COATED NAILS, 16D, 3"
TO WOOD POST WITH 2 HOT-DIP
TOE NAIL WOOD OFFSET BLOCK
(SRT & FLEAT)
TERMINAL TYPES 1B & 1T
GUARDRAIL APPROACH
1-24-2018
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
12R-61-H
15
CABLE ASSEMBLY
7" MIN. 5" MIN.2"+
FITTING AND STUD
STANDARD SWAGE
6'-6"
1†" DIA. 1‚" DIA.
CABLE TO BE SWAGE CONNECTED
ƒ" DIA. (6X19) GALVANIZED
ENTIRE LENGTH (N.C.)
1" DIA. THREADED
8„"
5•
"
‚"
Š" R 4"
‡" x 2" SLOT
5'-7‚"
2"
1"‰" ‰"
‚"
ASSEMBLY DETAIL
STRUT DETAILS(FLEAT)
2•"
2•
"
14 GAGE TUBE
(SRT & FLEAT)
TERMINAL TYPES 1B & 1T
GUARDRAIL APPROACH
1-24-2018
(SRT AND FLEAT)
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
8•
"
5•" 7•"
19"
15•
"2"
16"
1"
3" 3"
WOOD BREAKAWAY POST STEEL SLEEVE
22"
3"
16"
SOIL PLATE
DIMENSION
OUTSIDE
DIMENSION
OUTSIDE
CRT POST
6"
I.
D.
2"
STEEL PLATE
‚" THICK
2'-0"
6"9" 9"
9"
1'-
6"
8"
4"
6"
3•" DIA. HOLES
ƒ" DIA. HOLE
7"
6'-
0"
+0,-‚" +0, -…"
3ƒ"
3'-
9"
ƒ" DIA. HOLE
ƒ" DIA. HOLE
2•" DIA. HOLE
TS 8" x 6" x ‰"
BREAKAWAY POST
TO ATTACH WOOD
ƒ" DIA. HOLE
MOUNT SOIL PLATE
ƒ" DIA. HOLES TO
6"8"
4'-
6"
2ƒ"
ƒ" DIA. HOLES
13R-61-H
(FOR POST 1)
15
CABLE SLEEVE
NOTES:
NOTED.
DETAILS ON THIS SHEET APPLY TO THE "SRT" AND "FLEAT" UNLESS OTHERWISE
1"
STEEL BAND
FACTORY INSTALLED
(SRT ONLY)
(SRT & FLEAT)
TERMINAL TYPES 1B & 1T
GUARDRAIL APPROACH
1-24-2018
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
14R-61-H
15
8
ST
AN
DA
RD
GU
AR
DR
AIL SE
CTI
ON
AL
ON
G
CU
RVE
OF T
RAFFI
CDI
RE
CTI
ON
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
ST
AN
DA
RD
GU
AR
DR
AIL SE
CTI
ON
AL
ON
G
CU
RVE
OF T
RAFFI
CDI
RE
CTI
ON
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
OF
FS
ET
TY
PI
CA
L
OF T
RAFFI
C
DI
RE
CTI
ON
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
OF
FS
ET
TY
PI
CA
L
LO
CA
TIO
N
OF
AP
PR
OA
CH
GU
AR
DR
AIL
ON
CU
RV
ES
"F
LE
AT
EN
DIN
G"
FLE
AT E
NDI
NG
PO
ST
1
AN
D
PO
ST
8
ST
RAI
GH
T
LI
NE
BE
TW
EE
N
CO
NS
TR
UC
T
EN
DI
NG I
N
NO
TE:
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
OF
FS
ET
ME
AS
UR
ED
FR
OM
TY
PI
CA
L
PO
ST
OF
FS
ET
S
FR
OM
CH
AR
T
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
OF
FS
ET
TY
PI
CA
L
SRT E
NDI
NG
OF T
RAFFI
C
DI
RE
CTI
ON
ED
GE
OF
PA
VE
ME
NT
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
OF
FS
ET
TY
PI
CA
L
1
2
3
6
78
9
"S
RT
EN
DIN
G"
4
5
4'-0"
ED
GE
OF
PA
VE
ME
NT
(SRT & FLEAT)
TERMINAL TYPES 1B & 1T
GUARDRAIL APPROACH
1-24-2018
15R-61-H
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
15
ALL 1:10 SLOPES SHALL BE GRADED TO CLASS A SLOPE TOLERANCES.
THE RIGHT SIDE
TRAFFIC PASSING ON
THE LEFT SIDE
TRAFFIC PASSING ON
BOTH SIDES
TRAFFIC PASSING ON
(NOTE: ALTERNATE 3" BLACK AND 3" YELLOW STRIPES ON A 45° ANGLE)
USE REFLECTIVE SHEETING ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS:
REFLECTIVE SHEETING.
(HALF CIRCLE) SHALL BE COMPLETELY COVERED WITH HIGH INTENSITY ADHESIVE
ON THE "SRT", THE CURVED PORTION OF THE TERMINAL END SHOE FACING TRAFFIC
AS SPECIFIED ON THIS STANDARD.
AND TO THE CURRENT STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES, WHERE APPLICABLE, EXCEPT
NUTS, AND WASHERS) SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
ALL POSTS, OFFSET BLOCKS, BEAM ELEMENTS, AND HARDWARE (INCLUDING BOLTS,
NOTES:
RUN OF GUARDRAIL.
GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINAL. PLACE REFLECTORS BEGINNING ON STANDARD
GUARDRAIL REFLECTORS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED ON THE
SHEETING.
SHALL BE COMPLETELY COVERED WITH HIGH INTENSITY ADHESIVE REFLECTIVE
ON THE "FLEAT", THE PORTION OF THE IMPACT HEAD ASSEMBLY FACING TRAFFIC
(SRT & FLEAT)
TERMINAL TYPES 1B & 1T
GUARDRAIL APPROACH
1-24-2018
B.L.T.
W.K.P. 1 9R-62-H
EL
EV
ATIO
N
67
45
12
34
GU
AR
DR
AIL
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMIN
AL
TY
PE
2B
(X)
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
LE
NG
TH
OF
NE
ED
CO
NC
ER
N
AR
EA
OF
89
OF
TR
AF
FI
C
DI
RE
CTI
ON
PL
AN
VIE
W
TYP.
67
89
54
32
1
OF
TR
AF
FI
C
DI
RE
CTI
ON
1
8
3'-0"
MI
N. 1:10 SLOPE MAX.
2'-0"
OF
TH
E
ST
AN
DA
RD
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
SE
CTI
ON
FA
CE
OF
TH
E
LA
ST
TW
O
OF
FS
ET
BL
OC
KS
TA
NG
EN
T
LI
NE
PR
OJ
EC
TE
D
FR
OM
TH
E
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L
TY
PE 2
B
OPTION 1
(DETAILED ON SHEETS 1 THROUGH 4)
"S
KT"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8 *
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
B
IN
FO
RM
ATI
ON)
FO
R
TY
PE
MG
S-8
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
HEI
GH
T
(S
EE
ST
AN
DA
RD
PL
AN
R-6
0-
SE
RI
ES
28"
TY
PE
B
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L
TY
PE 2
B
LA
YO
UT
TO
TR
AN
SI
TI
ON
FR
OM
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8
TO
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
*
SE
E
ST
AN
DA
RD
PL
AN
R-6
0-
SE
RI
ES
FO
R
PO
ST
SP
ACI
NG
AN
D
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
TERMINAL TYPES 2B & 2T
GUARDRAIL APPROACH
16"
14•
"
21"
18"
15"
12"
19•
"
16•
"
13•
"
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
PO
ST
9
8
PO
ST
SP
AC
ES
AT 6'-3"
= 5
0'-0"
DO
NO
T
AT
TA
CH
TH
E
BE
AM
EL
EM
EN
T
TO
PO
ST 1
SH
OU
LD
ER
HI
NG
E
POI
NT
**
USI
NG 1:5
0
FL
AR
E
5
TO
CE
NT
ER
OF
PO
ST)
(F
RO
M
TA
NG
EN
T
LI
NE
OF
FS
ET
DI
ST
AN
CE
**
PO
ST
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVALCHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
Michigan Department of Transportation
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
APPROVED BY:
APPROVED BY:
Kirk T. Steudle
BY
PREPARED
DESIGN DIVISION
DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF FIELD SERVICES
DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT
Z (
FO
R
LE
NG
TH
OF
NE
ED
CA
LC
UL
ATI
ON)
(SKT & ET-PLUS)
1-24-2018
(X)
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
LE
NG
TH
OF
NE
ED
OF
TR
AF
FI
C
DI
RE
CTI
ON
910
TR
AN
SI
TI
ON
TH
RI
E
BE
AM
PL
AN
VIE
W
TYP.
67
89
54
32
1
OF
TR
AF
FI
C
DI
RE
CTI
ON
1
8
3'-0"
MI
N. 1:10 SLOPE MAX.
2'-0"
6'-3"
8
PO
ST
SP
AC
ES
AT 6'-3"
= 5
0'-0"
67
45
12
34
89
28"
OF
TH
E
ST
AN
DA
RD
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
SE
CTI
ON
FA
CE
OF
TH
E
LA
ST
TW
O
OF
FS
ET
BL
OC
KS
TA
NG
EN
T
LI
NE
PR
OJ
EC
TE
D
FR
OM
TH
E
10
34"
32"
CO
NC
ER
N
AR
EA
OF
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
T
TR
AN
SI
TI
ON
HEI
GH
T
37'-6"
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L
TY
PE 2
T
2 9R-62-H
EL
EV
ATIO
N
"S
KT"
GU
AR
DR
AIL
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMIN
AL
TY
PE
2T
DO
NO
T
AT
TA
CH
TH
E
BE
AM
EL
EM
EN
T
TO
PO
ST 1
SH
OU
LD
ER
HI
NG
E
POI
NT
16"
14•
"
21"
18"
15"
12"
19•
"
16•
"
13•
"
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
PO
ST
9
**
USI
NG 1:5
0
FL
AR
E
TO
CE
NT
ER
OF
PO
ST)
(F
RO
M
TA
NG
EN
T
LI
NE
OF
FS
ET
DI
ST
AN
CE
**
PO
ST
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
Z (
FO
R
LE
NG
TH
OF
NE
ED
CA
LC
UL
ATI
ON)
TERMINAL TYPES 2B & 2T
GUARDRAIL APPROACH
(SKT & ET-PLUS)
1-24-2018
28"
2"
GROUND LINE
3"
POST 1 DETAIL
ELEVATION SIDE
22"
GROUND LINE
WOOD BREAKAWAY POST
POST 2 DETAIL
ELEVATION SIDE
R-61-SERIES
SEE STANDARD PLAN
CABLE ASSEMBLY
WOOD BREAKAWAY POST
BEAM ELEMENT
22"
GROUND LINE
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-61-SERIES
WOOD BREAKAWAY POST
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-61-SERIES
SOIL PLATE
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-61-SERIES
SOIL PLATE
TO BLOCK/POST)
(DO NOT ATTACH
BEAM ELEMENT
QUICK RELEASE PLATE
R-61-SERIES
SEE STANDARD PLAN
CABLE ASSEMBLY
IMPACT HEAD ASSEMBLY
IMPACT HEAD ASSEMBLY
AWAY FROM TRAFFIC
GUARDRAIL EXIT SLOT
R-61-SERIES
STEEL SLEEVE SEE STANDARD PLAN
R-61-SERIES
STEEL SLEEVE SEE STANDARD PLAN
DIA. HOLE (TYP.)
HEAD BOLT WITH NUT THROUGH ƒ"
PLACE †" DIA. x 7•" LONG HEX
4'-4"
\ 2•" DIA. HOLE
DIA. HOLE (TYP.)
HEAD BOLT WITH NUT THROUGH ƒ"
PLACE †" DIA. x 7•" LONG HEX
4'-4"
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES
POST BOLT, WASHER AND NUT
CEMENT (SEE NOTES)
SEAL WITH ASPHALT ROOFING
CEMENT (SEE NOTES)
SEAL WITH ASPHALT ROOFING
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FORNOTE:
BETWEEN THE STEEL SLEEVE (SOIL TUBE) AND THE WOOD BREAKAWAY POST.
ASPHALT ROOFING CEMENT SHALL BE USED TO SEAL THE PERIMETER AREA
3 9R-62-H
R-63-SERIES
SEE STANDARD PLAN
(FLEAT-MT)
STRUT DETAIL
R-63-SERIES
SEE STANDARD PLAN
(FLEAT-MT)
STRUT DETAIL
R-63-SERIES
SEE STANDARD PLAN
(FLEAT-MT)
STRUT DETAIL
LAG SCREWS
…" DIA. x 3" LONG
DIA. HOLE (TYP.)
WASHER EACH SIDE THROUGH ƒ"
HEAD BOLT WITH NUT AND ROUND
PLACE †" DIA. x 10" LONG HEX
(SKT)
(SKT)
DIA. HOLE (TYP.)
WASHER EACH SIDE THROUGH ƒ"
HEAD BOLT WITH NUT AND ROUND
PLACE †" DIA. x 10" LONG HEX
EACH END OF THE CABLE SO THAT THE CABLE WILL NOT LOOSEN.
AFTER THE CABLE ASSEMBLY IS TAUT, A SECOND NUT SHALL BE INSTALLED ON
R-61-SERIES
SEE STANDARD PLAN
SOIL PLATE
R-61-SERIES
SEE STANDARD PLAN
SOIL PLATE
R-61-SERIES
SEE STANDARD PLAN
CABLE ANCHOR BRACKET
PREVENT PLATE ROTATION
ZINC COATED NAILS TO
TWO 3" LONG, 16D HOT-DIP
SEE DETAIL SHEET 4.
WITH 5" DIMENSION UP.
BEARING PLATE INSTALLED
2 - 1" DIA. HEX NUTS
1" DIA. WASHER
2•" DIA. HOLE
PLACE CABLE SLEEVE IN
TERMINAL TYPES 2B & 2T
GUARDRAIL APPROACH
(SKT & ET-PLUS)
1-24-2018
22"
GROUND LINE
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES
POST BOLT, WASHER AND NUT
22"
GROUND LINE
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES
POST BOLT, WASHER AND NUT
BEAM ELEMENT
22"
GROUND LINE
POST 3 AND 4 DETAIL
BEAM ELEMENT
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-61-SERIES
SOIL PLATE
R-61-SERIES
STEEL SLEEVE SEE STANDARD PLAN
POST 5 AND 7 DETAIL
POST 6 AND 8 DETAIL
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-61-SERIES
WOOD BREAKAWAY POST
BEAM ELEMENT
NOTE: BEAM ELEMENTS ARE SPLICED TOGETHER AT POST 3
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-61-SERIES
6" x 8" CRT POST
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES
6" x 8" WOOD OFFSET BLOCK
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-61-SERIES
6" x 8" CRT POST
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES
6" x 8" WOOD OFFSET BLOCK
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES
6" x 8" WOOD OFFSET BLOCK
4'-4" DIA. HOLE (TYP.)
HEAD BOLT WITH NUT THROUGH ƒ"
PLACE †" DIA. x 7•" LONG HEX
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES
POST BOLT, WASHER AND NUT
BEARING PLATE
8"
4"
5"
8"
1ˆ" DIA. HOLE†" THICK PLATE
AND HEX NUT (TYP.)
LONG SPLICE BOLT
†" DIA. x 1‚"
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
NOTE:
4 9R-62-H
( SKT & ET-PLUS )
(SEE NOTES)
ROOFING CEMENT
SEAL WITH ASPHALT
(SKT)
(SKT)
(SKT)
DIA. HOLE (TYP.)
HEAD BOLT WITH NUT THROUGH ƒ"
PLACE †" DIA. x 10" LONG HEX
COATED NAILS, 3" LONG MINIMUM
WOOD POST WITH 2 HOT-DIP ZINC
TOE NAIL WOOD OFFSET BLOCK TO COATED NAILS, 3" LONG MINIMUM
WOOD POST WITH 2 HOT-DIP ZINC
TOE NAIL WOOD OFFSET BLOCK TO
COATED NAILS, 3" LONG MINIMUM
WOOD POST WITH 2 HOT-DIP ZINC
TOE NAIL WOOD OFFSET BLOCK TO
POST 9 IS A STANDARD LINE POST.
3 THROUGH 9)
THE SECOND, THIRD, AND FOURTH BEAM ELEMENTS ARE STANDARD RAIL. (POSTS
BETWEEN THE STEEL SLEEVE (SOIL TUBE) AND THE WOOD BREAKAWAY POST.
ASPHALT ROOFING CEMENT SHALL BE USED TO SEAL THE PERIMETER AREA TERMINAL TYPES 2B & 2T
GUARDRAIL APPROACH
(SKT & ET-PLUS)
1-24-2018
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L
TY
PE 2
B (
ET)
OF
TR
AF
FI
C
DI
RE
CTI
ON
PL
AN
VIE
W
TYP.
67
89
54
32
1
OF
TR
AF
FI
C
DI
RE
CTI
ON
1
8
3'-0"
MI
N.
1:10 SLOPE MAX.
2'-0"
8
PO
ST
SP
AC
ES
AT 6'-3"
= 5
0'-0"
45
67
89
12
34
OF
TH
E
ST
AN
DA
RD
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
SE
CTI
ON
FA
CE
OF
TH
E
LA
ST
TW
O
OF
FS
ET
BL
OC
KS
TA
NG
EN
T
LI
NE
PR
OJ
EC
TE
D
FR
OM
TH
E
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
(X)
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
LE
NG
TH
OF
NE
ED
CO
NC
ER
N
AR
EA
OF
IN
FO
RM
ATI
ON)
FO
R
TY
PE
MG
S-8
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
HEI
GH
T
(S
EE
ST
AN
DA
RD
PL
AN
R-6
0-
SE
RI
ES
28"
TY
PE
B
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8 *
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
B
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L
TY
PE 2
B
LA
YO
UT
TO
TR
AN
SI
TI
ON
FR
OM
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
MG
S-8
TO
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
*
SE
E
ST
AN
DA
RD
PL
AN
R-6
0-
SE
RI
ES
FO
R
PO
ST
SP
ACI
NG
AN
D
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
OPTION 2
5 9R-62-H
EL
EV
ATIO
N
GU
AR
DR
AIL
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMIN
AL
TY
PE
2B
"E
T-P
LU
S"
SH
OU
LD
ER
HI
NG
E
POI
NT
16"
14•
"
21"
18"
15"
12"
19•
"
16•
"
13•
"
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
PO
ST
9
**
USI
NG 1:5
0
FL
AR
E
DO
NO
T
AT
TA
CH
TH
E
BE
AM
EL
EM
EN
T
TO
PO
ST
S 1, 3, 5
AN
D 7
TO
CE
NT
ER
OF
PO
ST)
(F
RO
M
TA
NG
EN
T
LI
NE
OF
FS
ET
DI
ST
AN
CE
**
PO
ST
Z (
FO
R
LE
NG
TH
OF
NE
ED
CA
LC
UL
ATI
ON)
(DETAILED ON SHEETS 5 THROUGH 8 AND 9)
TERMINAL TYPES 2B & 2T
GUARDRAIL APPROACH
(SKT & ET-PLUS)
1-24-2018
28"
10
34"
32"
45
67
89
OF
TR
AF
FI
C
DI
RE
CTI
ON
12
34
CO
NC
ER
N
AR
EA
OF
(X)
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
LE
NG
TH
OF
NE
ED
GU
AR
DR
AI
L,
TY
PE
T10
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMI
NA
L
TY
PE 2
T (
ET)
TR
AN
SI
TI
ON
TH
RI
E
BE
AM
TR
AN
SI
TI
ON
HEI
GH
T
PL
AN
VIE
W
TYP.
67
89
54
32
1
OF
TR
AF
FI
C
DI
RE
CTI
ON
1
8
3'-0"
MI
N.
1:10 SLOPE MAX.
2'-0"
8
PO
ST
SP
AC
ES
AT 6'-3"
= 5
0'-0"
6'-3"
37'-6"
OF
TH
E
ST
AN
DA
RD
GU
AR
DR
AI
L
SE
CTI
ON
FA
CE
OF
TH
E
LA
ST
TW
O
OF
FS
ET
BL
OC
KS
TA
NG
EN
T
LI
NE
PR
OJ
EC
TE
D
FR
OM
TH
E
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
6 9R-62-H
EL
EV
ATIO
N
GU
AR
DR
AIL
AP
PR
OA
CH
TE
RMIN
AL
TY
PE
2T
"E
T-P
LU
S"
16"
14•
"
21"
18"
15"
12"
19•
"
16•
"
13•
"
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
PO
ST
9
**
USI
NG 1:5
0
FL
AR
E
SH
OU
LD
ER
HI
NG
E
POI
NT
DO
NO
T
AT
TA
CH
TH
E
BE
AM
EL
EM
EN
T
TO
PO
ST
S
1, 3, 5
AN
D 7
TO
CE
NT
ER
OF
PO
ST)
(F
RO
M
TA
NG
EN
T
LI
NE
OF
FS
ET
DI
ST
AN
CE
**
PO
ST
Z (
FO
R
LE
NG
TH
OF
NE
ED
CA
LC
UL
ATI
ON)
TERMINAL TYPES 2B & 2T
GUARDRAIL APPROACH
(SKT & ET-PLUS)
1-24-2018
28"
2"
GROUND LINE
3"
CABLE ANCHOR
POST 1 DETAIL
22"
GROUND LINE
GUARDRAIL EXTRUDER GUARDRAIL EXTRUDER
ELEVATION SIDE
22"
GROUND LINE
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES
POST BOLT, WASHER AND NUT
WOOD BREAKAWAY POST
ELEVATION SIDE
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-61-SERIES
WOOD BREAKAWAY POST
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-61-SERIES
SOIL PLATE
R-61-SERIES
SEE STANDARD PLAN
CABLE ASSEMBLY
WOOD BREAKAWAY POST
BEAM ELEMENT
AWAY FROM TRAFFIC
GUARDRAIL EXIT SLOT
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-61-SERIES
SOIL PLATE
TO BLOCK/POST)
(DO NOT ATTACH
BEAM ELEMENT
LAG SCREWS
…" DIA. x 4" LONG
4'-
4" DIA. HOLE (TYP.)
HEAD BOLT WITH NUT THROUGH ƒ"
PLACE †" DIA. x 7•" LONG HEX
\ 2•" DIA. HOLE
4'-4" DIA. HOLE (TYP.)
HEAD BOLT WITH NUT THROUGH ƒ"
PLACE †" DIA. x 7•" LONG HEX
POST 2 DETAIL
(SEE NOTES)
ROOFING CEMENT
SEAL WITH ASPHALT
(SEE NOTES)
ROOFING CEMENT
SEAL WITH ASPHALT
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
7 9R-62-H
(ET-PLUS)
(ET-PLUS)
R-61-SERIES
SEE STANDARD PLAN
CABLE ASSEMBLY
R-61-SERIES
SEE STANDARD PLAN
ASSEMBLY
STRUT AND YOKE
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-61-SERIES
STRUT AND YOKE ASSEMBLY
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-61-SERIES
STRUT AND YOKE ASSEMBLY
R-61-SERIES
SEE STANDARD PLAN
SOIL PLATE
R-61-SERIES
SEE STANDARD PLAN
SOIL PLATE
DIA. HOLE (TYP.)
WASHER EACH SIDE THROUGH ƒ"
HEAD BOLT WITH NUT AND ROUND
PLACE †" DIA. x 10" LONG HEX
DIA. HOLE (TYP.)
WASHER EACH SIDE THROUGH ƒ"
HEAD BOLT WITH NUT AND ROUND
PLACE †" DIA. x 10" LONG HEX
SEE DETAIL SHEET 4.
WITH 5" DIMENSION UP.
BEARING PLATE INSTALLED
2 - 1" DIA. HEX NUTS
1" DIA. WASHER
PREVENT PLATE ROTATION
ZINC COATED NAILS TO
TWO 3" LONG, 16D HOT-DIP
2•" DIA. HOLE
PLACE CABLE SLEEVE IN
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-61-SERIES
STEEL SLEEVE
\ 2•" DIA. HOLE
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-61-SERIES
STEEL SLEEVE
TERMINAL TYPES 2B & 2T
GUARDRAIL APPROACH
(SKT & ET-PLUS)
1-24-2018
22"
GROUND LINE
22"
22"
GROUND LINE
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES
POST BOLT, WASHER AND NUT
BEAM ELEMENT
GROUND LINE
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES
POST BOLT, WASHER AND NUT
BEAM ELEMENT
NOTE: POST 9 IS A STANDARD LINE POST.
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-61-SERIES
SOIL PLATE
POST 4 DETAIL
POST 6, AND 8 DETAILPOST 5 AND 7 DETAIL
22"
GROUND LINE
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-61-SERIES
SOIL PLATE
POST 3 DETAIL
TO BLOCK/POST)
(DO NOT ATTACH
BEAM ELEMENT4'-
4"
AND HEX NUT (TYP.)
LONG SPLICE BOLT
†" DIA. x 1‚"
4'-
4" DIA. HOLE (TYP.)
HEAD BOLT WITH NUT THROUGH ƒ"
PLACE †" DIA. x 7•" LONG HEX
DIA. HOLE (TYP.)
HEAD BOLT WITH NUT THROUGH ƒ"
PLACE †" DIA. x 7•" LONG HEX
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES
6" x 8" WOOD OFFSET BLOCK
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES
6" x 8" WOOD OFFSET BLOCK
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-61-SERIES
6" x 8" CRT POST
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-61-SERIES
6" x 8" CRT POST
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES
6" x 8" WOOD OFFSET BLOCK
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES
6" x 8" WOOD OFFSET BLOCK
AND HEX NUT (TYP.)
LONG SPLICE BOLT
†" DIA. x 1‚"
TO BLOCK/POST)
(DO NOT ATTACH
BEAM ELEMENT
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
8 9R-62-H
(ET-PLUS) (ET-PLUS)
(ET-PLUS) (ET-PLUS)
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-61-SERIES
WOOD BREAKAWAY POST
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES
POST BOLT, WASHER AND NUT
(SEE NOTES)
ROOFING CEMENT
SEAL WITH ASPHALT
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-61-SERIES
WOOD BREAKAWAY POST
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES
POST BOLT, WASHER AND NUT
(SEE NOTES)
ROOFING CEMENT
SEAL WITH ASPHALT
DIA. HOLE (TYP.)
HEAD BOLT WITH NUT THROUGH ƒ"
PLACE †" DIA. x 10" LONG HEX
DIA. HOLE (TYP.)
HEAD BOLT WITH NUT THROUGH ƒ"
PLACE †" DIA. x 10" LONG HEX
COATED NAILS, 3" LONG MINIMUM
WOOD POST WITH 2 HOT-DIP ZINC
TOE NAIL WOOD OFFSET BLOCK TO
COATED NAILS, 3" LONG MINIMUM
WOOD POST WITH 2 HOT-DIP ZINC
TOE NAIL WOOD OFFSET BLOCK TO
COATED NAILS, 3" LONG MINIMUM
WOOD POST WITH 2 HOT-DIP ZINC
TOE NAIL WOOD OFFSET BLOCK TO
COATED NAILS, 3" LONG MINIMUM
WOOD POST WITH 2 HOT-DIP ZINC
TOE NAIL WOOD OFFSET BLOCK TO
NOTE:
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-61-SERIES
STEEL SLEEVE
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-61-SERIES
STEEL SLEEVE
POST 9 IS A STANDARD LINE POST.
3 THROUGH 9)
THE SECOND, THIRD, AND FOURTH BEAM ELEMENTS ARE STANDARD RAIL. (POSTS
BETWEEN THE STEEL SLEEVE (SOIL TUBE) AND THE WOOD BREAKAWAY POST.
ASPHALT ROOFING CEMENT SHALL BE USED TO SEAL THE PERIMETER AREA TERMINAL TYPES 2B & 2T
GUARDRAIL APPROACH
(SKT & ET-PLUS)
1-24-2018
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
9 9R-62-H
ALL 1:10 SLOPES SHALL BE GRADED TO CLASS A SLOPE TOLERANCES.
THE LEFT SIDE
TRAFFIC PASSING ON
BOTH SIDES
TRAFFIC PASSING ON
(NOTE: ALTERNATE 3" BLACK AND 3" YELLOW STRIPES ON A 45° ANGLE)
USE REFLECTIVE SHEETING ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS:
THE RIGHT SIDE
TRAFFIC PASSING ON
APPLICABLE, EXCEPT AS SPECIFIED ON THIS STANDARD.
SPECIFICATIONS AND TO THE CURRENT STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES, WHERE
BOLTS, NUTS, AND WASHERS) SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT STANDARD
ALL POSTS, OFFSET BLOCKS, BEAM ELEMENTS, AND HARDWARE (INCLUDING
NOTES:
COMPLETELY COVERED WITH HIGH INTENSITY ADHESIVE REFLECTIVE SHEETING.
THE PORTION OF THE IMPACT HEAD ASSEMBLY FACING TRAFFIC SHALL BE
POST 1).
(WITHOUT THE 1'-0" OFFSET FROM THE TANGENT LINE TO THE TRAFFIC FACE OF
GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINAL TYPES 2B & 2T CAN BE INSTALLED STRAIGHT
WHEN SITE CONDITIONS WARRANT AND WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER,
RUN OF GUARDRAIL.
GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINAL. PLACE REFLECTORS BEGINNING ON STANDARD
GUARDRAIL REFLECTORS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS ARE NOT TO BE USED ON THE
TERMINAL TYPES 2B & 2T
GUARDRAIL APPROACH
(SKT & ET-PLUS)
1-24-2018
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVALCHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
Michigan Department of Transportation
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
APPROVED BY:
APPROVED BY:
Kirk T. Steudle
BY
PREPARED
DESIGN DIVISION
DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF FIELD SERVICES
DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT
SECTION A-A
3'-6"
2'-8"
1'-4"8" 8" 2'-0"
3'-6"
TRANSITION SECTION.
CONNECT GUARDRAIL TO CONCRETE BARRIER, DOUBLE FACE
ROUND WASHERS FRONT AND BACK SHALL BE USED TO
BOLTS WITH 2" MINIMUM THREAD LENGTH AND NUTS WITH
HIGH STRENGTH ‡" DIAMETER x 26" LONG HEX HEAD
3'-6"
2'-4"
1'-8"
SURFACE
SHOULDER
SURFACE
SHOULDER
SURFACE
SHOULDER
SECTION B-B SECTION C-C
IN THE PAY ITEM "CONCRETE BARRIER, DOUBLE FACE, TYPE __".
CONCRETE BARRIER, DOUBLE FACE TRANSITION SECTION SHALL BE INCLUDED
CONCRETE BARRIER.
CURRENT GUARDRAIL HARDWARE, AND STANDARD PLAN R-49-SERIES FOR
SEE STANDARD PLANS R-60-SERIES AND R-67-SERIES, FOR DETAILS OF
NOTES:
DETAILS FOR CONNECTING GUARDRAIL TO CONCRETE BARRIER, DOUBLE FACE
15"
4 SPACES
POST SPACING
1'-6ƒ"
3 SPACES
POST SPACING
3'-1•"
1 SPACE
POST SPACING
6'-3"
25'-0"
3'-6"
GUARDRAIL ANCHORAGE, MEDIAN
BA C
BA C
4'-0"
(TYP)
•" MAX.
TRANSITION SECTION
CONCRETE BARRIER, DOUBLE FACE
ELEVATION VIEW
ELEVATION VIEW
GUARDRAIL ANCHORAGE, MEDIAN
1 1R-71-C
12'-0"
TRANSITION SECTION
CONCRETE BARRIER, DOUBLE FACE
SEE STANDARD PLAN R-49-SERIES
CONCRETE BARRIER
3-22-2017
FROM SINGLE SLOPE SHAPE TO VERTICAL WALL
UNIFORMLY TRANSITION THE BARRIER FACES
(SEE STANDARD PLAN R-67-SERIES)
THRIE BEAM TERMINAL CONNECTOR
(SEE STANDARD PLAN R-67-SERIES)
THRIE BEAM EXPANSION SECTION
* GUARDRAIL TYPE, MGS-8D
GUARDRAIL ANCHORAGE, MEDIAN.
GUARDRAIL, TYPE MGS-8D TO
LAYOUT TO TRANSITION FROM
FOR POST SPACING AND GUARDRAIL
* SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES
4'-0"4'-0"
HEIGHT INFORMATION)
FOR TYPE MGS-8D GUARDRAIL
(SEE STANDARD PLAN R-60-SERIES
34" TYPE TD
GUARDRAIL, TYPE TD
6'-3" TYPICAL POST SPACING
34"
B.L.T.
W.K.P.
B.L.T.
W.K.P. R-76-E
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVALCHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
Michigan Department of Transportation
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
APPROVED BY:
APPROVED BY:
Kirk T. Steudle
BY
PREPARED
DESIGN DIVISION
DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF FIELD SERVICES
DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT 1
CONCRETE GLARE SCREEN
BA
RRI
ER
CO
NC
RE
TE
GL
AR
E
SC
RE
EN
CO
NC
RE
TE
1'-0"1'-0"1'-0"1'-0"
2'-6"
4 "D" BARS EQUALLY SPACED WHEN JOINT SPACING IS LESS THAN 20'
5 "D" BARS EQUALLY SPACED WHEN JOINT SPACING IS LESS 20' OR GREATER
MATCH JOINTS IN CONCRETE BARRIER (SEE NOTES)
CONCRETE GLARE SCREEN REINFORCED WITH "D" BARS
ELEVATION VIEW OF
BA
RRI
ER
CO
NC
RE
TE
GL
AR
E
SC
RE
EN
CO
NC
RE
TE
1'-0" 6 DOWEL BARS EQUALLY SPACED WHEN JOINT SPACING IS 20' OR LESS
MATCH JOINTS IN CONCRETE BARRIER (SEE NOTES)
CONCRETE GLARE SCREEN REINFORCED WITH DOWELS AND LONGITUDINAL BARS
ELEVATION VIEW OF
1'-1"
7 DOWEL BARS EQUALLY SPACED WHEN JOINT SPACING IS GREATER THAN 20'
3"
3"
1'-0" 1'-0"
1'-0"
3"
3"
EPOXY COATED #4 "D" BAR (TYP)
EPOXY COATED #4 BAR 1'-1" LONG (TYP)
EPOXY COATED #4 BAR
8"
5"
9"
12†"
9"
12†"
1" R, (TYP)
•" BEVEL OR
CONCRETE BARRIER
SLOPE THE SAME AS
CONCRETE GLARE SCREEN
PORTION
CONCRETE BARRIER
1" R, (TYP)
•" BEVEL OR
CONCRETE BARRIER
CENTER OF
CONCRETE BARRIER
EXISTING
8"
5"
9"
12†"
1" R, (TYP)
•" BEVEL OR
CONCRETE BARRIER
CENTER OF
AND GROUTING
#4 BARS BY DRILLING
PLACE EPOXY COATED
CONCRETE BARRIER
EXISTING
AND GROUTING
"D" BARS BY DRILLING
PLACE EPOXY COATED
CONCRETE GLARE SCREEN CROSS - SECTION
REINFORCED WITH "D" BARS
CONCRETE GLARE SCREEN
AND LONGITUDINAL BARS
REINFORCED WITH DOWELS
CONCRETE GLARE SCREEN
3
3-22-2017
(SEE NOTES ON SHEET 3 OF THIS PLAN.)
IS REQUIRED.)
CONCRETE BARRIER. (NO STEEL REINFORCEMENT
IS PROPOSED AND POURED MONOLITHICALLY WITH
CONSTRUCTION WHERE CONCRETE GLARE SCREEN
THIS CROSS-SECTION SHALL BE USED ON ALL NEW
#4 BAR
LONGITUDINAL
EPOXY COATED
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
R-76-E2
CONCRETE GLARE SCREEN
1" R, (TYP)
•" BEVEL OR
ENGINEER (SEE NOTES)
MATERIAL APPROVED BY THE
MATERIAL CLASS II OR OTHER
TO BE FILLED WITH GRANULAR
FILLER (TYP)
‚" FIBER JOINT
WIDTH OF PIER
SLIP-FORMING (TYP)
2"< CLEARANCE FOR
9ƒ" 7‚" 9ƒ"7‚"
CONCRETE, SPLIT
GLARE SCREEN
CO
NC
RE
TE
BA
RRI
ER,
SP
LI
TFILLER SLAB
4" CONCRETE
SECTION A-A
A
A
CONCRETE BARRIER
8'-0" TAPERED SECTION
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC
DIRECTION OF TRAFFICBARRIERS AT PIERS
THROUGH WIDENED PORTIONS OF MEDIAN
LOCATION OF CONCRETE GLARE SCREEN
PLAN VIEW AT BRIDGE PIERS
3
3-22-2017
CONCRETE BARRIER - SPLIT AND CONCRETE GLARE SCREEN - SPLIT
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OF
SHEET
PLAN DATEF.H.W.A. APPROVAL
BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PLAN FOR
REINFORCEMENT IN CONCRETE GLARE SCREEN SHALL BE GRADE 40 STEEL.
KINKED LONGITUDINAL BARS SHALL NOT BE USED.
CONCRETE GLARE SCREEN WITH EXPANSION JOINTS IN CONCRETE BARRIER.
WEAKNESS JOINTS IN CONCRETE BARRIER, AND MATCH EXPANSION JOINTS IN
MATCH CONTRACTION JOINTS IN CONCRETE GLARE SCREEN WITH PLANE OF
OMITTED.
OF WHERE THE NORMAL JOINT WOULD BE LOCATED, THE NORMAL JOINT SHALL BE
THE STEEL IS REQUIRED). IF THE JOINT OVER THE CRACK IS WITHIN 4'-0"
THROUGH THE JOINT, THE STEEL BAR SHALL BE CUT AT THE JOINT (NO GAP IN
SCREEN DIRECTLY OVER THE CRACK, AND IF STEEL REINFORCEMENT GOES
AS A JOINT, A CONTRACTION JOINT SHALL BE PLACED IN THE CONCRETE GLARE
WHERE A CRACK IN THE EXISTING CONCRETE BARRIER APPEARS TO BE WORKING
STEEL, AFTER CONCRETE HAS BEEN ALLOWED TO HARDEN.
THE DOWEL BAR, CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL BE SAWED, CUTTING REINFORCING
WHEN THE LONGITUDINAL BAR IS FED IN CONTINUOUSLY IN LIEU OF TYING TO
1" ON BOTH SIDES.
CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL BE FORMED AND EDGED TO A DEPTH OF AT LEAST
NOTES:
THAN THE WIDTH OF THE CONCRETE BARRIER.
EDGES AND JOINTS SHALL BE ROUNDED, EXCEPT THE BASE WHEN IT IS LESS
FILLER IN LINE WITH EXPANSION JOINTS IN THE CONCRETE BARRIER. ALL
EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY INSERTING A 1" FIBER JOINT
BA
RRI
ER
CO
NC
RE
TE
GL
AR
E
SC
RE
EN
CO
NC
RE
TE
1'-2"
#4 "D" BAR
EPOXY COATED
BA
RRI
ER
CO
NC
RE
TE
GL
AR
E
SC
RE
EN
CO
NC
RE
TE
1'-2"
3"
#4 BAR 1'-2" LONG
EPOXY COATED
#4 BAR
EPOXY COATED
ELEVATION WHEN "D" BARS ARE USED
AND DOWEL BARS ARE USED
ELEVATION WHEN LONGITUDINAL BAR
CONCRETE GLARE SCREEN ENDINGS
(USE SAME ENDING WHEN REINFORCEMENT IS OMITTED)
R-76-E
CONCRETE GLARE SCREEN
3-22-2017
3 3
ADJOINING CONCRETE BARRIER.
SIDE SLOPE OF THE CONCRETE GLARE SCREEN SHALL MATCH SIDE SLOPE OF
GLARE SCREEN WILL BE REINFORCED AS SPECIFIED ON SHEET 1 OF THIS PLAN.
CASTING MONOLITHICALLY OR SEPARATELY. WHEN CAST SEPARATELY, THE
HAVING VARIABLE HEIGHT, THE CONTRACTOR WILL HAVE THE OPTION OF
WHEN CONCRETE GLARE SCREEN IS TO BE PLACED ON CONCRETE BARRIERS
SHALL BE CAST MONOLITHICALLY; NO STEEL REINFORCEMENT IS REQUIRED.
CONCRETE BARRIER AND CONCRETE BARRIER, SPLIT, THE TWO STRUCTURES
WHEN CONCRETE GLARE SCREEN IS INCLUDED IN THE SAME CONTRACT WITH
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL
ROAD DESIGN
1.02.03 (revised 4-21-2014) Vicinity Maps
A vicinity map may be required for projects involving new route locations or significant right-of-way acquisitions. The map may be drawn to any recognized scale which is at least 750 scale (1"=750'), that permits showing the entire project on one plan sheet, whenever possible. A scale smaller than 750 scale is not recommended because of its inability to display detail. The level of detail may vary as needed and might include some of the following items: centerline right-of-way limits topographical features such as county
roads, city limits, lakes, rivers, railroads, drainage courses, etc.
section corners, ¼ corners, section numbers and lines, township and range, north arrow
The vicinity map may be combined with the drainage map at the discretion of the Designer. 1.02.04 (revised 1-29-2018) Drainage Maps The drainage map should show ditch lines using arrows to show the direction of flow, culverts, bridges, etc., for both existing and proposed conditions. Drainage structure sizes, both upstream and downstream, should also be shown. Show all county drains within the project limits. When a drainage course is a county drain, it should be indicated on the plans and drainage sheet. If the survey does not indicate the information, check with the MDOT Drainage Coordinator in the Environmental Section of the Bureau of Highways
1.02.04 (continued) The R.O.W width for the county drain must be shown on the plans. If the drain has no specified R.O.W. width, it should be wide enough to allow working room for maintaining the drains outside the highway R.O.W. Right of way widths should always be coordinated with the MDOT Drainage Coordinator (Utilities Design Supervising Engineer), the respective Region/TSC Drainage Coordinators(s) and verified by the County Drain Commissioner. An additional drainage sheet may be required on urban projects showing existing sewers and structures. Upon completion of the drainage design, proposed sewers, structures, and their quantities may be added to this sheet. The drainage map should also include the following items or information: The direction of flow for all existing and
proposed ditches, drains, sewers and culverts
North Arrow Names of streets, highways, county roads,
railroads, rivers, etc. Outline of the proposed road Tabulation of drainage data for all culverts
30” or greater in diameter Drainage districts For small or intermediate sized culverts the tabulation only needs to include design runoff and the drainage area. Drainage areas which are equal to or greater than 2 square miles require a more elaborate tabulation. (See MDOT Drainage Manual Section 5.3.4 for information on this tabulation.)
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL ROAD DESIGN 3.05 Section deleted. 3.06 (revised 1-29-2018) DESIGN SPEED Design speed is a selected speed used to determine the various geometric design features of the roadway. Once selected, all of the pertinent design features of the highway should be related to the design speed to obtain a balanced design. 4R projects: Where practical, it is MDOT desirable practice to design roadway geometrics for new construction or reconstruction based on a recommended project design speed 5 mph greater than the posted speed. This practice is founded in research that shows actual operating speeds are typically greater than the posted speeds. Design speeds shown in Appendix 3A are applicable for 4R projects. 3R projects: For freeway 3R projects, the minimum design speed is the design speed approved at the time of original construction or reconstruction, whichever is most recent. Design speeds used for non-freeway 3R projects are shown in Section 3.09.02. However, if the original posted speed has been raised, the designer may use the design speed approved at the time of original construction or reconstruction, whichever is most recent. Also See Section 3.08.01C for information on combined 3R and 4R work.
3.06 (continued) The project design speed to be recorded on the title sheet is the predominant selected design speed. This will be either the MDOT recommended design speed (Appendix 3A or Section 3.09.02A & 3.09.02B) or if applicable, the matched original construction/latest preceding 4R design speed allowed for 3R projects. If the highest attainable design corresponds to criteria for speeds less than the minimum design speed, a design exception or variance must be submitted for approval. For additional information see Section 14.11. Documentation must be for each geometric element and not a blanket statement applying to all geometric elements. A design speed reduction for individual geometric elements does not redefine the overall “project design speed”.
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL ROAD DESIGN 3.09 NON-FREEWAY RESURFACING, RESTORATION AND REHABILITATION (3R) MINIMUM DESIGN GUIDELINES 3.09.01 (revised 1-6-99) General The intent of the 3R guidelines is to extend the useful life of existing roadways and enhance safety while incurring minimal aesthetic and environmental disturbance and economic burden. Often, design guidelines used for new and major reconstruction are not cost effective on 3R projects. Where economically and physically practical, design guidelines should be according to AASHTO requirements to insure the greatest traffic service. The ultimate goal is to improve operating conditions and provide highways that are reasonably safe and fit for travel. 3R guidelines are divided into three categories that are addressed in subsequent sections of this chapter. These are NHS, Non-NHS and 3R Safety Considerations. They apply strictly to non-freeway applications. Guidelines for freeway 3R and 4R type work are addressed separately in Section 3.11.
3.09.02 (revised 1-29-2018) 3R Minimum Guidelines Minimum guidelines for controlling design elements shall be according to the following:
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL ROAD DESIGN 3.09.02 (continued) A. Non-Freeway, NHS
Geometric Elements Non-Freeway, NHS 3R Minimum Guidelines
Design Speed
(see Section 3.06) Posted Speed Minimum
Shoulder Width
NOTE: Minimum shoulder widths apply for posted speeds greater than 45 mph. Restrictions such as right of way and roadside context sensitivity issues may preclude the use of minimum shoulders within city, village or township limits with posted speeds of 45 mph and less.
Current ADT Two-Way
Inside Shoulder
Outside Shoulder
Two Lane
(and three lane when the center lane is
a left turn lane)
<750
750 - 5000
>5000 - 10,000
>10,000
3'-0" Gravel
6'-0" (3'-0" Paved)
8'-0" (3'-0" Paved)
8'-0" (7'-0" Paved)
Multi-Lane Undivided
≤ 10,000 > 10,000
6'-0" (3'-0" Paved) 8'-0" (3'-0" Paved)
Multi-Lane Divided
≤ 10,000 > 10,000
3'-0" Paved 3'-0" Paved
6'-0" (3'-0" Paved) 8'-0" (3'-0" Paved)
See Bridge Design Manual Appendix 12.02 for Bridge Widths
Lane Width
ADT Lane Width
≤750
>750
10'-0"
11'-0" 10'-0" lanes may be considered in urban areas for multi-lane un-divided (regardless of ADT) and multi-lane divided (ADT < 10,000). 12'-0" lanes are desirable on the Priority Commercial Network (PCN). 12'-0" lanes are required on the National Network (also known as the National Truck Network). Design Exceptions / Design Variances to maintain existing narrower lanes generally receive favorable consideration but a high burden of justification is placed on requests to reduce lane widths to less than 12’-0".
Design Loading Structural Capacity
Rural Urban
Minimum Design Loading HS20. Minimum Design Loading HS20.
(See Bridge Design Manual Appendix 12.02 for other trunkline classifications)
Horizontal Curve Radius and
Stopping Sight Distance
Existing curve radius and stopping sight distance may be retained if the design speed of the existing curve is not more than 15 mph below the project design speed and there is no crash concentration. Otherwise standards for new construction apply. See 2011 6th Edition AASHTO Green Book or MDOT Sight Distance Guidelines.
Maximum Grade Review crash data. Existing grade may be retained without crash concentration.
Cross Slopes Traveled way 1.5% - 2%, Shoulder see Section 6.05.05
Superelevation Rate Standard Plan R-107-Series or reduced maximum (6%) Straight Line Superelevation Chart using the project design speed.
Vertical Clearance See Section 3.12.
Appendix 3A
GEOMETRIC DESIGN ELEMENTS New Construction / Reconstruction
3A-1
Element Urban Rural
Design Speed
Freeway The greater of posted speed, or 60 mph. The greater of posted speed, or 70 mph. Non
Freeway (Arterial)
The greater of posted speed, or 30 mph. The greater of posted speed, or 40 mph..
Collector Roads
Posted speed (minimum). Posted speed (minimum)..
Lane Width
Freeway 12 ft. 12 ft.
Non Freeway (Arterial)
12 ft, lanes are most desirable and should be used where practical. 11 ft. lanes are often used for low speed (45 mph design) Lane widths of 10 ft. may be used in more constrained areas where truck and bus volumes are relatively low and speeds are less than 35 mph. 12 ft. lanes are required on the National Network (NN).
Design Speed, (mph)
Minimum Lane Width, ft. ADT, vehicles/day
Under 400
400 to 1500
1500 to 2000
Over 2000
40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75
11* 11* 11* 11* 12 12 12 12
11* 11* 11* 11* 12 12 12 12
11* 11* 12 12 12 12 12 12
12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
*12 ft. desirable
Collector Roads
Added turn lanes at intersections 10-12 ft. Where right-of-way is restricted. 11 ft. Industrial Areas 12 ft.
Design Speed, (mph)
Minimum Lane Width, ft. ADT, vehicles/day
Under 400
400 to 1500
1500 to 2000
Over 2000
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
10* 10* 10* 10* 10* 10* 10* 11* 11*
10* 10* 10* 11* 11* 11* 11* 11* 11*
11* 11* 11* 11* 11* 11* 11* 12 12
12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Where shoulders are used, see guidelines for Rural Collectors
*12 ft. desirable
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL
ROAD DESIGN
CHAPTER 5
INDEX
RIGHT OF WAY 5.01 REFERENCES 5.02 GLOSSARY OF TERMS 5.03 GENERAL 5.03.01 R.O.W. Plans 5.04 R.O.W. WIDTHS 5.05 URBAN R.O.W. 5.05.01 Urban Expressways 5.05.02 Consent to Construct Sidewalk 5.06 LIMITED ACCESS R.O.W. AT RAMP INTERSECTIONS 5.07 TURNBACK PROJECTS 5.08 TYPES OF R.O.W. EASEMENTS OR CONVEYANCE FOR DRAINAGE 5.08.01 Special Ditches 5.08.02 County Drains 5.08.03 Drainage Structures 5.08.04 Retention Basins 5.09 DRIVEWAYS 5.10 R.O.W. AT RAILROAD CROSSINGS 5.11 CONSENT TO GRADE 5.12 POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATED SITES
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL
ROAD DESIGN
CHAPTER 5 RIGHT OF WAY INDEX (continued) 5.13 TEMPORARY FENCE 5.14 PRESERVING R.O.W. LOCATION 5.14.01 Government Corners 5.14.02 Alignment Monuments 5.14.03 R.O.W. Monuments 5.15 REST AREAS AND WEIGH STATIONS 5.16 RIGHT OF WAY PLAN SUBMITTAL 5.16.01 Environmental Clearance 5.16.02 Public Hearing Certification 5.16.03 Transmittal of Plans and Material 5.16.04 R.O.W. Forms 5.17 BASE PLANS (PRELIMINARY R.O.W. PLANS) 5.18 REQUIREMENTS FOR BASE PLANS (PRELIMINARY R.O.W. PLANS) 5.19 PRELIMINARY PLANS (FINAL R.O.W.) 5.20 REQUIREMENTS FOR PRELIMINARY PLANS (FINAL R.O.W.) 5.21 R.O.W. REVISIONS 5.22 MINOR CONSTRUCTION CHANGES FORM 5.22.01 Showing Excess Property on Plans 5.22.02 Site Clearance 5.23 R.O.W. SUMMARY 5.24 R.O.W. SKETCHES
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL
ROAD DESIGN
CHAPTER 5
RIGHT OF WAY 5.01 REFERENCES Operating Instruction 8503.01, Acquisition of Right of Way from or for Railroads. 5.02 (revised 1-29-2018) GLOSSARY OF TERMS Abandonment - Legally, cessation of use of R.O.W. or activity thereon with no intention to reclaim or use again. Sometimes erroneously called "vacation". Divisional usage: relinquishment of control to a subordinate governmental unit, e.g., county. Acquisition or Taking - The process of obtaining R.O.W. Air Rights - The property rights for the control or specific use of a designated airspace involving a highway. Appraisal - An estimate of quantity, quality, or value. The process through which conclusions of property value are obtained; also commonly the report setting forth such estimate and conclusion and the different variables and calculations used to reach such conclusion. Award - The determination rendered by a judge, jury, or commission upon a controversy submitted to them, such as value of real property or damage thereto. Clear Vision Corner - A corner of an at grade intersection from which all obstructions have been removed and on which no construction or growth is allowed that will interfere with a line of sight established according to principles of safety. Generally requires property beyond the normal R.O.W., triangular in shape with the longer leg along the major highway. Clear vision corner R.O.W. is generally limited access.
5.02 (continued) Compensation - Indemnification; payment of damages; and equivalent in money for a loss sustained and given for property taken or for an injury done to another. Condemnation - The process by which property is acquired for highway and public purposes through legal proceedings under power of eminent domain. Condemnation Trial - A step in the condemnation procedure, conducted by a judge in a court of law, in which the Department is represented by the Attorney General, where the amount of compensation to be paid to a property owner is determined. Consents Consent to Construct Temporary Drive - The right to enter and to construct a temporary drive upon a specific area of land, which right will expire at the completion of the construction of the described project. Said temporary drive is to be removed at the end of said construction and the underlying lands returned as nearly as possible to their former condition. Consent to Grade - The right to enter upon a specific area of land for the purpose of grading, including the right to grade and/or alter the underlying lands, which right will expire at the completion of the construction of the described project, or upon a specified date. Consequential Damages - Loss in value of a parcel, no portion of which is acquired, resulting from a highway improvement. Control of Access - The condition where the right of owners or occupants of abutting land or other persons to access, light, air, or view in connection with a highway is fully or partially controlled by public authority.
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL
ROAD DESIGN
5.02 (continued) GLOSSARY OF TERMS Deed - A duly attested written instrument, conveying real property or an interest therein. Deed, Quitclaim - A deed conveying, without warranty, any title, interest, or claim that the grantor may have in the estate conveyed. Deed, Warranty - A deed containing covenants by the grantor, for himself/herself and his/her heirs, to the grantee and his/her heirs, to warrant and defend the title and possession of the estate conveyed. Drainage Easement - An easement for directing the flow of water and to allow construction and maintenance of sewers, ditches, and such. Easement - An interest or right held by one person in land owned by another person whereby the first person is accorded partial use of such land for a specific purpose. An easement restricts but does not abridge the rights of the fee owner to the use and enjoyment of the easement holder's rights. Eminent Domain - The power to take private property for public use. Eminent domain gives the government the right to take possession of private property in the manner directed by the Constitution and the laws whenever the public interest requires it. Encroachment - Any structure illegally erected within or overhanging the R.O.W. and attached to the land, such as a fence, building, or gasoline pump. Has been expanded to include occupation of the R.O.W., e.g., parking vehicles offered for sale.
5.02 (continued) Fee Simple, also Fee and Fee Simple Absolute - Full, complete ownership of land. It is free from liens, judgments, easements, and in fact, all encumbrances. Government Corner - Also called a Public Land Survey System (PLSS) corner, means the corners established in the original government survey of the state. The original surveys in Michigan first established the Township boundaries. Then, in an orderly sequence, subdivided the townships into sections NOMINALLY one mile square. The PLSS corners marking the four corners of a section are more specifically termed Section Corners. The sections are nominally divided into four parts by Quarter Corners approximately half way between the section corners. Nearly all land in Michigan, including state highways, is described by reference from one or more government corners. There are generally four section corners (Northeast, Southeast, Southwest and Northwest) for each section, one defining each corner of this section. Often a section corner is a common point for one to three other sections. Section lines are the lines from section corner to quarter corner around the outside of each section. There are often "Double" corners along township lines. Preservation of the monuments marking the location of PLSS corners is required by Michigan Act 74, P.A. 1970, as amended. Michigan Act 345 of 1990 is an act to re-monument all the corners of the state over a 20 year period. Highest and Best Use - The most profitable use, reasonable, but not speculative or conjectural to which property may be put in the future. Just Compensation - A full and fair equivalent for the loss sustained by the owner as a result of taking or damaging of private property for highway purposes.
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL
ROAD DESIGN
5.02 (continued) GLOSSARY OF TERMS Legal Description - A description of real property by government survey, metes and bounds, or lot numbers of a recorded plat including a description of any portion thereof subject to an easement of reservation, if any. Market Value - The highest price for which property can be sold in the open market by a willing seller to a willing purchaser, neither acting under compulsion and both exercising reasonable judgement. Necessity Hearing - A step in the condemnation procedure, conducted by a judge in a court of law, in which the Department is represented by the Attorney General, wherein the desirability of the project and the need for the particular parcel is determined. Negotiation - The process by which property is sought to be acquired for highway purposes through discussion, conference, and final agreement upon the terms of a voluntary transfer of such property. Partial Taking - Acquisition of a portion of a parcel of property.
5.02 (continued) Plats Subdivision - An official map showing the division of a tract or area into lots for use or occupancy. Plat development is regulated under Act 288, P.A. 1968 and local ordinance. Plats are recorded in the office of the Register of Deeds in the counties and filed with the Subdivision Control Unit of the Department of Commerce. Most plats identify and dedicate R.O.W. within and bordering the subdivision. Subdivisions are identified with a unique title or name and the name of the owner or developer. Assessor's Plats and/or Supervisor's Plats are established for the convenience of a local authority for tax or assessment purposes. The assessing officer will certify that the local governmental authority has acquired title to the highways, streets, alleys, and public places shown on said assessor's plat by reason of purchase, dedication, condemnation, or adverse possession for public use; and if there are any to which the local governmental authority has not acquired title for public use, the extent of their use shall be plainly stated. (The language of the statute pertains to the use of roads, streets, etc., to which title has not been acquired and not to the character and the rights of lot owners or others or the ownership of the land itself. In other words, such plats cannot dedicate R.O.W. for public use; they can only certify R.O.W. as it actually is or the use to which it is being put.)
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL
ROAD DESIGN
5.02 (continued) GLOSSARY OF TERMS Possession and Use Agreement (P&U) - A form used when negotiations cannot be completed by the Real Estate agent and the owner has no objection to the State's taking possession of the land and commencing construction prior to determination of compensation. Private Claim - A parcel of land which was in private ownership at the time United States sovereignty was established. Private claims are numbered and almost always abut navigable waters. These claims were surveyed prior the General Land Office survey in Michigan are not a part of the rectangular Public Land Survey System. Property Controlling Corner - A public land survey corner or any property corner which does not lie on a property line of the property in question but which controls the location of one or more property corners of the property in question. Property Corner - A geographic point on the surface of the earth which is on, is a part of, and controls a property line. Remainder - The portion or portions of a land ownership that remain after a public use (Eminent Domain) acquisition has been taken from that ownership. Remnant - A remainder of land so small or irregular that it usually has little or no economic value to the owner. Right of Entry - The lawful right to enter upon a parcel of land, which is in the process of being acquired, for the purpose of beginning the construction, or processes related to construction (drilling, testing, etc.) of a public project.
5.02 (continued) Right of Way - (R.O.W.) - The entire area reserved for the construction, operation, and maintenance of the roadway and the improvement of the roadside. Right of way will either be free access or limited access. Limited access right of way is when the inherent right of access to a public highway by the abutting owner or occupant is acquired along with the title to the right of way. Right of Way Appraisal - A determination of the market value of property including damages, if any, in advance of acquisition. Right of Way Marker - A signpost of wood, concrete, or metal construction which served as an indicator of the approximate location of right-of-way along public ways. The signpost was painted or otherwise labeled with "R/W". The signpost extended well above the surface of the ground in order to be readily visible to the public and the abutting landowners. Right-of-way markers were used to mark section line intersections, changes in R.O.W. widths, the beginning and ending of curved right-of-way lines, and other locations that would benefit landowners and the public. Right-of-way markers were not usually set along limited access roadways. Right-of-way markers and fencing were not placed by professional surveyors and were not intended to define the limits of roadway R.O.W. Right of Way Monument - A right-of-way monument is placed by a professional surveyor to identify a corner or a point-on-line of right-of-way. Right-of-way monuments are set flush with the ground surface or slightly below to increase their stability and survivability. Monuments are stamped with a monument number and the license number of the professional surveyor responsible for setting the monument. Right-of-way monuments are set in locations where fee title has been acquired and are intended to define the boundaries of such lands.
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL
ROAD DESIGN
5.02 (continued) GLOSSARY OF TERMS Riparian Rights - The property and other rights of an owner of waterfront property in the bed, banks and water of a lake or stream. Riparian rights cannot be severed from the upland parcel to which they accrue. Roadside Control - The public regulation of the roadside to improve highway safety, expedite the free flow of traffic, safeguard present and future highway investment, conserve abutting property values, or to preserve the attractiveness of the landscape. Roadway - The part of the R.O.W. required for construction, limited by the outside edges of slopes and including ditches, channels and all structures pertaining to the work. In short, the area between slope stake lines. Scenic Easement - An easement for conservation and development of roadside views and natural features. Setback Lines - A line established by zoning ordinance, deed restriction or custom regulating the distance from the R.O.W. line of a street or highway to the point where improvements may be constructed. Sight Line Easement - An easement for maintaining or improving the sight distance. Slope Stake Line - The limits of the designed roadway cross section where the finished side slope of an excavation or embankment meets the surface of the existing ground. It is detailed on the plans as a dashed line and marked in the field by marked stakes (slope stakes).
5.02 (continued) Statutory Right of Way - The right of way of roads established by “use”, where no other right of way was established by dedication or purchase. This right of way is defined by statutes and generally accepted to be 66', 33' either side of the centerline of the traveled way, or where the road is along section or quarter section lines, the right of way is measured 33' either side of those lines. Step-1 Authority - Authority from the FHWA to secure title information. Step-2 Authority - Authority from the FHWA to proceed with appraisals, negotiations, and actual acquisition. Stipulated Settlement - An agreement in an active court case under court jurisdiction which settles an issue or the entire case between contending parties without a judge's or jury's decision. It further must be approved by the court and made a matter of record. Title - The evidence of a person's right to the property or the right itself. Title Insurance Commitment - A document issued to a prospective land purchaser by a title insurance company by which the company agrees to issue a title insurance policy on that parcel of land. The commitment contains the recorded legal description of the land, the name and address of the present owner, the title search findings, such as, chain of title information, title encumbrances, liens, easements, tax payment information, and the terms and conditions by which the insurance company is willing to guarantee title. Title Search - An investigation of public records and documents to ascertain the history and present status of title to property, including ownership, liens, charges, encumbrances, and other interests.
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL
ROAD DESIGN
5.03 (revised 1-29-2018) GENERAL Right of Way studies of a preliminary nature are nearly always made before the final survey is started. Right of way is decidedly a prominent part of a set of plans and should be carefully reviewed for the entire project before preliminary plans are started. Acquisition of R.O.W. is often difficult, expensive, and time consuming, and it is the responsibility of the Design Engineer to expedite all plan work pertaining to R.O.W. matters. 5.03.01 (revised 1-29-2018) R.O.W. Plans The purpose of R.O.W. plans is to furnish the Development Services Division with plans that have the requirements outlined in sufficient detail so that proper descriptions can be prepared and the land acquired for construction purposes. The information on the plans is used in drawing up various instruments such as deeds, releases, easements, etc., and in legally describing and locating the various parcels of land referred to in these instruments. The right of way information provide in the plans are used by agents in making appraisals, property purchases for court actions when necessary, and for record purposes.
5.04 (revised 9-20-2010) R.O.W. WIDTHS The proposed R.O.W. width should be sufficient to accommodate the planned roadway. Federal regulations specify "The State shall acquire rights-of-way of such nature and extent as are adequate for the construction, operation, and maintenance of a project." AASHTO guidelines specify that "right-of-way widths should not be less than that required for all elements of the highway cross section and appropriate border areas." Anticipated traffic volume, stage construction, real estate values, winter snow removal and storage difficulties, flat or rolling country, etc., should be considered in the selection of R.O.W. widths. It is essential that the R.O.W. width selected will meet all the requirements of ultimate construction as determined by careful highway planning. As a rule, proposed R.O.W. or a consent to grade are based on slope stake lines. A general rule of thumb is to provide 7' to 10' from the slope stake line to the proposed R.O.W. or consent to grade limits, although proposed R.O.W. should not be jogged too often to follow the slope stake line. Some engineering judgement is required. The methods of acquisition are not explained in detail, however, it is the intent that R.O.W. be available for the maintenance of the total width including such drainage as may be necessary. It is desirable, whenever local conditions will permit, to call for a uniform width of R.O.W. through a specific property, rather than to break it into a series of varying widths. Logical breaks or points of change are at fence lines or property lines that intersect the project. In the majority of cases, the property owner will prefer this method of R.O.W. acquisition. If the road can be built on less than the standard width, in order to avoid costly building relocation, the R.O.W. is frequently "jogged". However, care should be exercised in this practice because many times when the R.O.W. is jogged to miss the buildings they still suffer substantial damage, thus the jogging may not be justified.
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL
ROAD DESIGN
5.05 URBAN R.O.W. Where all or portions of a project are located in urban areas, R.O.W. may be limited to the width determined by municipal planning or to existing R.O.W. Portions within urban boundaries that have never been developed should be set up the same as for rural projects. Occasionally, because of the increased width of the proposed surface, additional R.O.W. is needed. In this case the new width is determined by the Department, and the designer should become familiar with whatever agreements or decisions are made. 5.05.01 (revised 1-29-2018) Urban Expressways Right of way is of primary importance in urban expressway design. Modern expressways are designed to provide roadways of sufficient width to carry large volumes of traffic frequently including frontage roads and access ramps, requiring R.O.W. widths of 300' to 400'. Obviously, a strip of land of this width cutting across a city is very costly and disruptive, and the work involved in securing the necessary properties requires a lot of time. Construction that is slowed by R.O.W. acquisition may further be delayed by the moving and razing of many buildings. Base Plans (Preliminary R.O.W.), although not exact and thus subject to revision, should be placed on file in the city's offices and used as a criterion for the issuing of building permits in areas where construction is planned in the near future. 5.05.02 (revised 1-29-2018) Consent to Construct Sidewalk Whenever feasible, new or reconstructed sidewalk should be placed 1 foot minimum inside the existing or proposed R.O.W. line (as determined by a Professional Surveyor). When the proposed sidewalk grading limits extend outside the R.O.W., a Consent to Construct Sidewalk (Form 0640C) is requested. The consent obtains permission
5.05.02 (continued) from and/or gives notice to the adjacent property owner of the Department’s intent to construct new and/or to replace existing sidewalks within the existing or proposed R.O.W. See application #3 on the following page for proposed sidewalk remaining outside the R.O.W. Show slope stake lines to determine the impact to the property. The Development Services Division will make an estimate of just compensation for the consent. Most communities require the property owner to pay for their own sidewalks. Therefore, when MDOT pays for placing/replacing the sidewalk as part of project expense, the consent may be considered a mutual benefit between the property owner and MDOT. After review, the MDOT Development Services Division may determine that compensation for the required R.O.W. and other site improvements (fences, bushes, signs, etc.) is necessary. Consent is noted at each applicable location as:
Consent to Construct Sidewalk
Listed below are several applications for use of the Consent to Construct Sidewalk and options in the event of failure to obtain consent or easements. Gapping out sidewalk construction in areas with consent or easement conflicts is not an acceptable option. Sidewalk accessibility must be provided for persons with disabilities according to the Americans with Disability Act (ADA) of 1990. When constructing sidewalk, the Department is responsible for meeting ADA accessibility requirements for the public sidewalk. The area outside these limits may require restoration of existing private connection to the sidewalk. Regardless of whether or not consent is granted, accessibility impact should be discussed with the property owner during consent negotiations. See Section 6.08.06 for information on accessibility requirements for private connections to sidewalks.
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL
ROAD DESIGN
5.05.02 (continued) Consent to Construct Sidewalk 1. Existing sidewalk extends to the face
of buildings - In the downtown business districts, many businesses are on the R.O.W. line or just beyond the R.O.W. line. If the existing sidewalk is being reconstructed to the face of a building, obtain the Consent to Construct Sidewalk. No easement would be required if the pedestrian travel zone of the sidewalk is within the existing R.O.W. The consent requested would include construction of the sidewalk frontage zone located outside the existing R.O.W. to add aesthetic value to the business property. If the consent is not granted, MDOT may elect to delete the parcel and construct the sidewalk to the R.O.W. line leaving the remaining portion of old sidewalk to the face of the building with consideration for accessibility as previously stated.
2. Existing sidewalk to be replaced in
existing R.O.W., but grading is needed outside existing R.O.W.- Many communities have the existing sidewalks constructed one foot inside the R.O.W. line. If the proposed sidewalk requires a slope stake line outside the existing R.O.W., obtain the Consent to Construct Sidewalk. This consent allows for reconstructing the sidewalk within the existing R.O.W. and placing fill material and/or excavating the back slope on the private property to construct the sidewalk to the proper line and grade. If the consent to construct sidewalk is refused during negotiations, MDOT may elect to delete the parcel and build retaining walls with possible fencing or guardrail to keep the sidewalk and associated grading within the R.O.W. with consideration for accessibility as previously stated. If construction of the sidewalk cannot be accommodated within the existing R.O.W. or by consent, MDOT will be required to condemn for either the consent to construct sidewalk or an easement in order to construct the new sidewalk
5.05.02 (continued) 3. Sidewalk Partially Outside R.O.W. -
When a slope stake line falls within any portion of an existing sidewalk that is either outside or partially outside the R.O.W., obtain a Consent to Construct Sidewalk. The consent allows for reconstructing a new sidewalk within the existing R.O.W. and removing that portion of existing sidewalk outside the existing R.O.W. If a proposed new or reconstructed continuous sidewalk is to remain partially outside the R.O.W., MDOT must acquire some form of permanent easement, or fee R.O.W. for the sidewalk remaining outside the existing R.O.W. Although MDOT is not responsible for the future maintenance or repair of the sidewalk, the easement ensures the preservation of a sidewalk width compliant with ADA requirements. For tying in short intermittent alterations to existing sidewalk outside the right of way see #5. If the consent or easement is refused by the property owner, MDOT may elect to delete the parcel, remove and replace that portion of the sidewalk within the R.O.W. and build retaining walls with possible fencing or guardrail to keep the sidewalk and associated grading within the R.O.W. As previously stated, accessibility impacts should be addressed during consent negotiations. If construction of the sidewalk cannot be accommodated within the existing R.O.W. or by consent, MDOT will be required to condemn for either the consent to construct sidewalk or easement in order to construct the new sidewalk.
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL
ROAD DESIGN
5.05.02 (continued) Consent to Construct Sidewalk 4. Constructing Sidewalk Outside
Existing R.O.W. - When sidewalk is constructed or reconstructed outside the existing R.O.W. MDOT will acquire some type of permanent R.O.W., easement or fee R.O.W. to construct the sidewalk outside the existing R.O.W. Failure to obtain the permanent R.OW. during negotiations will require MDOT to condemn for permanent R.O.W. to replace the sidewalk. Whenever feasible, sidewalk should be constructed or reconstructed one foot minimum inside the existing/proposed R.O.W. (as determined by a Professional Surveyor).
See Section 6.08.01 for the Department’s position on sidewalk liability and maintenance agreements. When the adjacent property is subject to Section 4(f) of the U. S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966, permanent easement or fee R.O.W. is usually not feasible. Consent to construct sidewalk should be pursued under these conditions.
5. Tying to Existing Sidewalk – When
intermittent sidewalk construction such as sidewalk ramp upgrading or driveway construction is not done in conjunction with construction or reconstruction of the continuous sidewalk, the instrument used to access private property will depend on the proposed placement of the altered section of sidewalk. Consent to construct sidewalk can be used to tie in to existing sidewalk outside the right of way if the sidewalk is not realigned or widened outside the right of way. In other words, there is no further increase to existing encroachment. If the sidewalk alignment or width is altered causing further encroachment outside the right of way, a permanent easement is required.
5.05.02 (continued) The Project Manager should seek local government support for the project, utilizing Context Sensitive Design concepts. Local agencies can provide valuable assistance by holding public meetings to seek input from the community, of which, impacted property owners are primary stakeholders. This "input" process may help alleviate many disagreements and allow all stakeholders to reach consensus prior to any acquisition or consent activity. If local officials are very supportive of the project, many times they talk directly with the affected owners to secure agreement for a certain design of the sidewalks. It is required that MDOT obtain an agreement for the local agency’s acceptance of responsibility for maintenance of the sidewalk.
Any R.O.W. or consent should be acquired by MDOT in order for timely acquisition of the right of way needs. In the event that the property owner fails to sign a Consent to Construct Sidewalk, the plans should be revised according to the different scenarios above or the Development Services Division initiates the condemnation process prior to letting the plans.
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL
ROAD DESIGN
5.06 LIMITED ACCESS R.O.W. AT RAMP INTERSECTIONS In order to control access in the interchange area along crossroads adjacent to and within the influence of ramp intersections, limited access R.O.W. should be extended along the crossroad. See Section 5.24, Figures 5.24.01 and 5.24.02. 5.07 TURNBACK PROJECTS As a general rule, the Department will not acquire additional R.O.W. on turnback projects. If additional R.O.W. is required, it must be obtained by the local agency. See Section 12.03.05 for additional information on R.O.W. on turnback projects. 5.08 (revised 9-20-2010) TYPES OF R.O.W. EASEMENTS OR CONVEYANCE FOR DRAINAGE 1. Right of way will be required when an
outlet ditch is to be constructed in a location where there was no previous ditch.
2. Existing ditches flowing across the R.O.W.
that will require cleaning and deepening will require consent from the affected property owner(s) to clean the outlet ditch.
5.08.01 Special Ditch Any additional R.O.W. required for intercepting ditches through tillable areas or for swamp ditches, where permanent control is needed for clean-out or other maintenance, should be shown as proposed permanent R.O.W. See Section 5.24, Figures 5.24.04, 5.24.05, and 5.24.06.
5.08.02 ( revised 1-29-2018) County Drains See the Road Sample Plans for proper labeling. See Section 5.24, Figure 5.24.06. 5.08.03 Drainage Structures Wherever catch basins, sewers, drainage tile, cobble gutters, riprap, etc., are extended or placed beyond the proposed R.O.W. limits, they should be noted like this:
R.O.W. to Construct and Maintain Drainage Structure
5.08.04 (revised 2-14-2002) Retention/Detention Basins R.O.W. for detention basins should be acquired in fee so that it can be fenced. See Sections 7.06.10 and 5.24, Figure 5.24.06. R.O.W. for detention basins should be noted as:
Prop. R.O.W. for Retention Basin
or
Prop. R.O.W. for Detention Basin
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL
ROAD DESIGN
5.09 (revised 1-29-2018) DRIVEWAYS Any work involving creating or altering a driveway that extends beyond the R.O.W. line requires a consent. A consent requires that the property owner be contacted and the existing property description be determined. The consent must be specific in what it is to cover, as:
*
“Close" Drive
Consent to "Grade" Drive
Consent to "Relocate" Drive
(Quotes added for emphasis only)
* Includes grading, resurfacing in kind, and reconstructing the drive.
Do not use:
Permit to Construct "Hot Mix Asphalt." (or "Conc.") Drive Permit to “Widen” Drive
If a driveway or driveway approach is to be combined, a permit must be obtained from each affected property owner. See Section 5.24, Figures 5.24.04 and 5.24.06.
5.09 (continued) It is important to show the limits of the driveway work by outlining the proposed driveway, not using dimensions. Slope stake lines, driveway profiles and/or grade information (Example: 2% for 15' then 7% to existing) is also useful to Real Estate personnel when contacting the property owner. When changes occur to a driveway outside MDOT R.O.W., after Preliminary Plans (Final R.O.W.) are submitted, a R.O.W. revision must be submitted to the Region Real Estate Agent and the Region Real Estate Technician. See Section 5.21.
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL
ROAD DESIGN
5.10 (revised 1-29-2018) R.O.W. AT RAILROAD CROSSINGS When determining the clear vision R.O.W. requirements of an at-grade trunkline crossing with a railroad, a plan sheet of the area in question should be submitted by the Design Engineer to the Railroad Coordination Unit – Office of Rail. This should be done as early as possible, so that the needed R.O.W. may be shown on the Preliminary Plans (Final R.O.W.). See Section 5.24, Figure 5.24.03. 5.11 (revised 1-29-2018) CONSENT TO GRADE In cases where minor grading extends a short distance beyond the existing R.O.W., a consent to grade may be required. When it is anticipated that more than 500 cyd of earth excavation is to be removed from a grading consent area, the R.O.W. plans should show the location and estimated quantities. Drainage structures, culverts, and ditches should not be placed within areas with a grading consent, but require fee R.O.W. or easements. Consents to Grade shall be dimensioned from the proposed or existing R.O.W. lines. See Section 5.24, Figure 5.24.04. When the adjacent property is subject to Section 4(f) of the U. S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966, permanent easement or fee R.O.W. is usually not feasible. A Consent to Grade (Form 0640C) should be pursued under these conditions.
5.12 POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATED SITES The identification of potentially contaminated sites is important on all projects, whether proposed R.O.W. is required or the project will be built within existing R.O.W. The Design Engineer should refer to the procedure outlined in Chapter 14. 5.13 TEMPORARY FENCE It may be necessary to provide temporary fencing in stock grazing land where extra R.O.W. for grading and disposal of muck is required. A miscellaneous quantity of woven wire fence (for temporary fencing) should be shown on the note sheet. 5.14 (revised 1-29-2018) PRESERVING R.O.W. LOCATION Knowledge of the physical location of the R.O.W. is important to the Department when future improvements or expansions are planned. It is immediately important to owners of remainder properties abutting our fee ownership. Unless monuments are placed to mark the alignment on which the R.O.W. was purchased, confusion may result over the location of the R.O.W. In urban trunklines and rural expressway projects, where use of alignment monuments by surveyors would be so dangerous as to be impractical, the R.O.W. lines are monumented. In both cases, state law requires that all Government Corners used in the design survey or affected by construction activities be preserved and a record filed with the Register of Deeds.
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL
ROAD DESIGN
5.14.01 (revised 1-29-2018) Government Corners A description, witnesses and alignment ties to Government Corners are contained in the survey notes. The Design Survey Section or Region Surveyors must be consulted when questions arise. All Government Corners and property control corners that fall within the construction area must be identified on the plans and marked "PRESERVE". If MDOT professional staff are not available, the contractor will be required to retain a Michigan licensed professional surveyor to accomplish this work as described in the current Specification. Activities under this section must conform to the requirements of the Land Corner Recordation Act, Act 74, P.A. 1970, as amended. This act requires that corners of the Public Land Survey System be monumented in place or by reference monument, and that if any such monument be located in a hard surfaced roadway, it shall be placed in a monument box.
5.14.02 (revised 1-29-2018) Alignment Monuments On MDOT trunklines wherever their future use is deemed practicable, survey markers should be set at all points defining the road alignment. Alignment points include PC, PI, PT, etc. The Region Project Development Engineer should consult with the Region Surveyor to determine, during scoping, if the alignment on a project should be monumented. If the Region determines that the alignment be monumented, and has programed sufficient funding to do so ,the Design Unit adds the appropriate pay items to the plans and notes proposed locations to be monumented on the construction plans as follows:
Place Alignment Control Marker – PRESERVE
Survey marks shall consist of rebar not less than ⅝” in diameter and 18" in length. All alignment points in the road surface should be placed in a monument box. Since alignment is a component of our boundary, Act 299, P.A. 1980, as amended, requires that this work be performed by a Michigan licensed professional land surveyor. If MDOT professional staff are not available, the contractor will be required to retain a professional surveyor to monument alignment points.
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL
ROAD DESIGN
5.14.03 ( revised 1-29-2018) R.O.W. Monuments In cases where setting monuments to preserve the alignment is not possible or practical, the actual limits of the R.O.W. should be established. Right of way lines should be monumented:
at the intersection of all section lines and private claim lines (Along the Detroit and St. Clair rivers long narrow plats of land were established. These are known as French Claims and there are no section lines in this area); at the intersection of all subdivision block lines; at all changes in direction of the line; at the P.C. and P.T. of curved sections of the line; at intervals not greater than 2000'.
In determining the location of monuments placed at the 2000' spacing, the intersection of the right of way with section subdivision lines or other property lines identified in the design survey should be used whenever possible. When service roads are involved, monumentation will be along the outside R.O.W. of the service road. If the service road R.O.W. is not contiguous with the freeway R.O.W., both lines must be monumented. The Design Unit notes proposed locations to be monumented on the construction plans as follows:
Place Monument with MDOT ROW cap stamped with the license number of the
Professional Surveyor in charge - PRESERVE
5.14.03 (continued) After the Design Unit has noted the locations of the monuments, it will send the digital data to the Survey Unit for review. The Survey Unit will mark any proposed changes and return the digital data to the Design Unit. If additional R.O.W. is acquired, Development Services Division will notify the Survey Unit, who will determine when the placement of the R.O.W. monuments will be completed. Therefore, when R.O.W. monumenting is called for, the following note should be placed on the plans:
R.O.W. monuments and marker posts are not a part of this contract
The placement of R.O.W. monuments is boundary surveying and shall be performed by the Survey Unit or a consultant survey firm based on Act 299, P.A. 1980, as amended. Monumenting of R.O.W. will apply on all projects requiring the acquisition of R.O.W. When acquiring easement and fee right-of-way, MDOT must comply with Public Act 132 of 1970, as amended as part of the survey process. See the MDOT Wiki Page for additional information - http://mdotwiki.state.mi.us/design/index.php/Chapter_4_-_Surveys_-_Types#4.6_Certified_Surveys_for_Real_Estate_Acquisition 5.15 REST AREAS AND WEIGH STATIONS When a rest area or weigh station is recommended, R.O.W. requirements are to be shown on the plans and secured along with the road R.O.W.
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL
ROAD DESIGN
5.16 ( revised 1-29-2018) RIGHT OF WAY PLAN SUBMITTAL Right of way requirements are submitted in two phases, preliminary and final. These phases have been incorporated into the Base Plan and the Plan Review milestone submittals. ProjectWise workflows have been created as noted in Chapter_1_-_ProjectWise_Pre-Bid_Processes of the Design Submittal Requirements to provide further guidance. Base Plans (Preliminary R.O.W. Plans) is for title search, project right-of-way cost estimates assigning parcel numbers, preparation of the ownership sheet and creation of the Parcel.dgn file. The Parcel.dgn file is a reference file that is attached to the Alignment/ROW plan sheets prior to the Preliminary Plan submittal. The Parcel.dgn file contains the legal property lines of properties affected by proposed R.O.W. along with parcel numbers and other parcel report information. (See http://mdotwiki.state.mi.us/design/index.php/Chapter_3_-_Standard_Naming_Conventions for more detail) The Parcel.dgn file is created by Development Services Division Technical Unit, Region Surveyor, Region Real Estate Unit, or Consultant if contracted to perform this work task. After Preliminary Plans (Final R.O.W.) have been submitted as part of the Plan Review milestone, any changes required to the R.O.W. plans are submitted as a R.O.W. revision. This R.O.W. revisions represents a snapshot in time. Changes to the design that would impact a property owner and any proposed R.O.W. items should only be considered if time permits prior to letting. These changes should be discussed with the Region Real Estate Agent and Buyer to determine the impact of the Proposed Acquisition and minimize the potential for a delay due to changes in R.O.W. The Designer prepares the plans by laying out the R.O.W. requirements of a highway. The plans used for R.O.W. purposes are drawn utilizing MDOT’s current CADD format.
5.16 (continued) At least one month prior to the submittal of Base Plans (Preliminary R.O.W.), the Project Manager or the Design Engineer should verify that a ROW phase is set up on the Phase Initiator (P.I.) system. The ROW phase does not need to be chargeable, but it must be on the P.I. system. If the ROW phase is not on P.I., the Project Manager or Design Engineer should submit a change request in JobNet. When the Base Plans (Preliminary R.O.W.) are submitted to the Development Services Division, the Project Manager will complete the process to obtain a chargeable ROW phase. The design plans should be at a point where the final Slope Stake Lines and construction limits have been identified. Roughly 50% complete before Final R.O.W. is submitted. The project must have an Environmental Clearance (and Public Hearing Certification, if needed). The Project Manager has the responsibility for verifying that Environmental Clearance and Public Hearing Certification has been obtained In the Marked Final R.O.W. Phase the Development Services Division, Technical Unit, Region Real Estate Unit, or consultant if contracted for this phase adds the ownership sheet. Not required but if requested by the Region Real estate Unit or Buyer, the Legal Property Lines, parcel number and other parcel report information can be attached to the Removal and Construction Plan Sheets by attaching the Parcel.dgn file as a reference file for making individual Property parcel sketches.
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL
ROAD DESIGN
5.16.01 Environmental Clearance All projects are required to be classified environmentally. If the project has not been cleared, the Environmental Section, Project Planning Division (PPD), Bureau of Transportation Planning, will need a set of plans for their review and subsequent classification of the project. 5.16.02 (revised 2-18-2010) Public Hearing Certification and Public Meetings Projects which require an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) require a formal Public Hearing. For other projects that require the acquisition of several (approximately 25 or more) parcels of R.O.W. a public information meeting should be considered prior to the R.O.W. acquisition. The Public Involvement Unit, Statewide Transportation Planning, Bureau of Transportation Planning will schedule a Public Hearing if required and can assist in scheduling a public information meeting prior to the R.O.W. acquisition. Such a meeting is held in a location and at a time convenient to the individuals directly affected.
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL
ROAD DESIGN
5.16.03 (revised 1-29-2018) Transmittal of Plans and Materials Any transmission of plotted plans, section maps, and other material, as well as the Final R.O.W., are made through the Project Manager, who keeps the necessary records and distributes prints as required. Any revision of the R.O.W., must follow this same channel. The current method of transmittal is electronic via MDOT’s project management system (ProjectWise). Transmittal includes the submission of CADD files and prints plotted in PDF format. A. ProjectWise Procedure Upon submittal of the various R.O.W. transmittals the project manager shall place the R.O.W. files into ProjectWise. There are two parts to the ProjectWise transmittal. Submission of the CADD files and the submission of PDF files. The PDF files are the documents of record and as such are located in locked folders. The ProjectWise location of the CADD files will be provided by the designer as part of the CADD transmittal. This will include the location of the design base files and sheet files. See Standard_Naming_Conventions for information that is included in each file. The technician can utilize the sheet CADD files created by design as a template for developing R.O.W. exhibits. It is the designer’s responsibility to notify Real Estate of any changes to the appropriate design base files that are included in the R.O.W. CADD transmittal. A snap shot of CADD files used to create The Plan Review files will be submitted in the RID_Preliminary folder as part of the RID Review process. The D-XXXXXX_ROW_20YY-MM-DD.dgn can not be modified without a subsequent submittal.
5.16.03 (continued) B. ProjectWise Template 5.16.04 (revised 1-29-2018) R.O.W. Forms The form needed to submit R.O.W. plans is in PDF fillable format. The 0303 form should be used at each submittal. The 0303 form should be completed and signed by the Project Manager.
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL
ROAD DESIGN
5.17 (revised 1-29-2018) BASE PLANS (PRELIMINARY R.O.W.) The Base Plans (Preliminary R.O.W.) submittal should be submitted based upon the approved dates established by the Planisware network for the project. Project Managers must meet this date and are encouraged to submit the Preliminary R.O.W. earlier if possible. The Region Project Development Engineer will notify the appropriate review groups via ProjectWise email notification of the Base Plan Review meeting with ProjectWise links to the signed 0303 Design form and submitted Base Plans (Preliminary R.O.W. Plans). The review groups will review the Base Plans (Preliminary R.O.W. Plans) and all review comments are collected by the Region Project Development Engineer. After the Base Plan Review meeting has occurred, any review comments that require changes to the Base Plans (Preliminary R.O.W. Plans) will be incorporated into the development of the Preliminary Plans (Final R.O.W. Plans). Any R.O.W. or Design revisions that occur after the Plan Review meeting and submission of the Preliminary (Final R.O.W. Plans) will be documented by using the 0303 Design Form and follow the Revision process. The Design Plan Submittal memorandum (0303 Design Form) contains Design and Real Estate information. The 0303 contains the following information along with addition information: A. Control section and job number B. Location C. Environmental Classification (and date of
determination), if available. D. Anticipated R.O.W. Certification date E. A general description of the R.O.W.
needed to construct the project, i.e., proposed R.O.W. consists of limited access R.O.W. for relocated interchange ramp.
5.18 (revised 1-29-2018) REQUIREMENTS FOR BASE PLANS (PRELIMINARY R.O.W.) The Base Plans (Preliminary R.O.W.) should include the following: 1. See Chapter 1 and the Road Sample
Plans for guidance regarding plan sheet creation.
2. Design Plan Submittal Form 0303.
Distribute plans and memos as per the distribution list.
3. Consultants are also required to submit
both the CADD and PDF files to the Project Manager through ProjectWise utilizing MDOT’s standard system format.
The following items are not required but if available should be sent as part of the Base Plans (Preliminary R.O.W.) submittal:
Survey notes with property ties and government corners, vicinity map depicting the location of the various proposed R.O.W., and existing and proposed typical cross sections.
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL
ROAD DESIGN
5.19 (revised 1-29-2018) PRELIMINARY PLANS (FINAL RIGHT OF WAY) When the design plans are at a point where the final slope stake and construction limits have been identified (roughly 50% complete), Preliminary Plans (Final R.O.W.) should be submitted showing final R.O.W. requirements. On large projects it may be desirable to have an informal plan review with representatives from the Environmental Section, Real Estate Services Section, Region Real Estate Agent and the Design R.O.W. Engineer prior to the Plan Review meeting. This may help to avoid future R.O.W. revisions and ensure that the Development Services Division is receiving all of the information it needs. The R.O.W. necessary for the proposed project is outlined on Form 0303. The Region Project Development Engineer will notify the appropriate review groups via ProjectWise email notification of the Plan Review meeting with ProjectWise links to the signed Form 0303 and submitted Preliminary Plans (Final R.O.W.). The review groups will review the Preliminary Plans (Final R.O.W.) and all review comments are collected by the Region Project Development Engineer. After the Plan Review meeting has occurred, any review comments that require changes to the Preliminary Plans (Final R.O.W.) will be incorporated into the development of the Final Plans (Plan Completion). Any R.O.W. or Design revision after the submittal of the Preliminary Plans (Final R.O.W.) will follow the process in section 5.21.
5.20 (revised 1-29-2018) REQUIREMENTS FOR PRELIMINARY PLANS (FINAL R.O.W.) In addition to the requirements for Base Plans (Preliminary R.O.W.), the following information is needed for Preliminary Plans (Final R.O.W.): 1. See Chapter 1 and the Road Sample
Plans for guidance regarding plan sheet creation.
R.O.W. revisions can be used to modify the Final R.O.W. submittal as requested by the Designer or Region Real Estate. Designers should make determining R.O.W. needs a priority in the Design Process.
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL
ROAD DESIGN
5.21 (revised 1-29-2018) R.O.W. REVISIONS Right of Way Revisions are processed by the Project Manager. The Project Manager must complete the “R.O.W.” box on each revised plan sheet summarizing the revisions. Should there be more than one revision on a given plan sheet each subsequent revision shall be added to the individual sheet that is revised (see figure 5.21A) The Project Manager completes and signs the Design Plan Submittal Form 0303 attaching the revised plan sheet(s) with the revisions circled in red. The 0303 Form should include a detailed description of and reason for the revisions. The requesting unit or division should also be included on the memorandum. Revisions, unless originated within the Development Services Division, are not normally accepted within six months of the letting date. If a revision is necessary within six months of letting, consult with the Real Estate Service Section or Region Real Estate Agent, or the Design R.O.W. Engineer to determine the best method for processing the Revision If a R.O.W. Revision includes a majority (more than 50%) of the plan sheets included in the Preliminary Plan (Final R.O.W.) plan submittal, it is advisable to re-submit the entire set of Preliminary Plan (Final R.O.W.) plans instead of issuing a R.O.W. Revision. The Design R.O.W. Engineer should be consulted in making this determination. Figure 5.21A
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL
ROAD DESIGN
5.22 (revised 9-12-97) MINOR CONSTRUCTION CHANGES FORM During the negotiations between the property owner and the MDOT Real Estate Agent, the property owner may request some construction change or note be made on the plans. For example, the property owner may want the driveway relocated 60 feet west of its existing location because of improvements planned for the property. Or a property owner may request the timber from removed trees to be stockpiled for the property owner's use. The Real Estate Agent will describe the change on Minor Construction Changes Form (form 728). Any requested change involving design issues are to be presented to the designers for their approval or denial before the negotiation is complete, by the Real Estate Agent or the Region Project Development Engineer. The designer is encouraged to work with the Real Estate Agent in reaching an agreement that satisfies the property owner while providing a safe and constructible road. When the Design Unit receives signed, approved 728 forms, every effort should be made to place the information on the plans. This will aid the construction field office and the contractor. The cost for the change should be included in the estimate. The changes shown on Form 728 should not require the submittal of R.O.W. revision, because they should not change the limits of the proposed R.O.W.
5.22.01 (revised 2-27-2012) Showing Excess Property on Plans Many times MDOT has excess property in the project vicinity. Quite often this property could be used by the contractor for locating various batch plants, equipment and materials storage, or disposing of excess excavations. The designer should consult with the Real Estate and Construction Field Services Division to determine if the excess property locations should be shown on the plans. If it is determined that the project area contains excess property that could be used by the contractor, the construction plans will require a special provision informing the contractor of any restrictions for the use of the property and/or items required for authorization of its use (by the Resident Engineer) and that a rental agreement between the contractor and MDOT (Development Services Division) may be required. 5.22.02 (revised 2-27-2012) Site Clearance Occasionally the Development Services Division will request the Design Division to include the removal or demolition of a building in the design plans. The Development Services Division will provide all the necessary information to be included in the proposal package, including the Building Removal Specifications (Form 665).
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL
ROAD DESIGN
5.23 (revised 1-29-2018) R.O.W. SUMMARY The preceding commentary on the processing of R.O.W. should be considered as a general guideline only. Each project will have to be examined for special or unique features that might require further study. These should be discussed with the Design R.O.W. Engineer (liaison between Design and the Development Services Division). Preliminary reviews will help to reduce the number of R.O.W. revisions. Changes in R.O.W. design, after it has been submitted, must be held to a minimum. In some cases the R.O.W. may already have been acquired, as detailed on previously submitted plans. Changes usually dictate that additional time may be needed to clear R.O.W. and additional expenses charged to the project. To avoid interference or delay during construction, the Development Services Division must be satisfied that all requirements are met. Revisions in R.O.W. can be avoided by making certain concessions in the form of ditch changes, steeper slopes, etc., to stay inside the R.O.W. as previously submitted. These practices should be encouraged insofar as they do not materially detract from the concepts of a good design and/or safety.
5.24 (revised 9-22-2014) R.O.W. SKETCHES The R.O.W. sketches included in this section should be considered general guidelines for depicting certain situations only. The sketches are not intended to show complete R.O.W. dimensioning for every situation.
ROAD DESIGN MANUAL
ROAD DESIGN 7.01.25 (revised 1-29-2018) Guardrail Approach Terminals Crashworthy end treatments are critical to guardrail installations. An approach terminal is designed to redirect an impacting vehicle and to reduce the occurrences of a vehicle being penetrated, rolled, or vaulted in an end on hit. The following section describes the characteristics and uses of approved standard treatments. A. Type 1 Terminals Type 1 Guardrail Approach Terminals are flared gating terminals. On projects let on or before June 30, 2018, this is the preferred design when grading limits allow for the appropriate 4'-0" offset of the terminal end from the tangent extension of the standard line of guardrail run. When the Type 1 terminal is called for on plans by reference to Standard Plan R-61-Series, the contractor may use one of three terminal options. Descriptions of the current approved options are described in this section. On projects let after June 30, 2018, Type 1 guardrail terminals will not be permitted for new construction and where specified for updating until further notice. 1. Slotted Rail Terminal (SRT) The SRT was adopted by the Department in 1995 when FHWA mandated the discontinued use of the BCT. It subsequently became the first guardrail terminal to pass the NHCRP Report 350 crash test criteria. The concept of a slotted rail terminal consists of longitudinal slots cut into the W-beam rail element to control the location of dynamic buckling thus reducing the potential for impact or penetration of the occupant compartment by the buckled rail element. The SRT was originally intended as a retrofit or replacement for the BCT ending.
7.01.25 (continued) The SRT uses many of the same components used in the BCT. It also uses features common to other end treatments such as the yoke and strut and controlled release terminal (CRT) posts. The parabolic flare of the SRT is identical to that of the BCT, simplifying the retrofit of existing terminals. 2. Flared Energy Absorbing Terminal (FLEAT) FLEAT was adopted in 1998 after it passed NCHRP Report 350 crash testing. Among other reasons, it was chosen as an alternate for the SRT because of the similarities in the components and installation configuration of the two systems. In addition to these similarities to the SRT and other flared terminals, the FLEAT includes an energy absorbing impact head. Unlike the SRT, the 4'-0" offset of the FLEAT is a straight taper rather than a parabolic flare. 3. Minimum Offset The Type 1 Terminal is designed to have a minimum offset of 4'-0", measured from the tangent line of the guardrail run. Whenever conditions allow, the line of guardrail designed in advance of the terminal should be flared to further increase the total offset of the terminal from the traveled lane. On curved roadways the offset is measured from the circular extension of the standard rail alignment along the curve. Sometimes on certain minor trunklines and a great number of local roads, the end post may have to be placed on the slope beyond the shoulder hinge point, in which case care should be taken that the terminal end shoe and the steel sleeves are not left "high" nor placed too low.
ROAD DESIGN MANUAL
ROAD DESIGN 7.01.25 (continued) Guardrail Approach Terminals B. Type 2 Terminals Type 2 terminals are tangent, energy absorbing terminals. They are used when proper grading cannot be achieved to accommodate the 4'-0" offset called for with the Type 1 terminals. When the Type 2 terminal is called for on plans by reference to Standard Plan R-62-Series, or by special provision, the contractor may use one of the terminal options with the following caveat. On projects let after June 30, 2018, Type 2B and 2T guardrail terminals will not be permitted for new construction or for updating terminals. Instead, Type 2M guardrail terminals will be required for new installations and for updating guardrail terminals. 1. Extruder Terminal (ET) (Type 2B & 2T) The ET was installed experimentally by the Department in 1993 and was used occasionally when special situations called for a non-flared terminal. In 1995 the ET became the first non-flared terminal to meet the NCHRP Report 350 crash test criteria. Frequent use of the ET led to its upgraded status as a standard plan in 1997. It features an impact head that, when hit head on, flattens the guardrail beam element as the head translates down the terminal rail. The flattened rail is then extruded away from the impacting vehicle.
7.01.25 (continued) 2. Sequential Kinking Terminal (SKT)
(Type 2B & 2T) The SKT was successfully crash tested in 1997 and adopted by the Department as a standard Type 2 terminal alternate in 1998, replacing the BEST. The materials and configuration of the SKT were more compatible with the ET. Like the FLEAT, its impact head includes a deflector plate that produces sequential kinks in the beam element before extruding it away from the impacting vehicle. 3. Type 2M Terminals Type 2M terminals are similar to the Type 2 terminals except they are MASH-compliant. They are specified by special provision and required on projects let after June 30, 2018 for new installations and when updating guardrail terminals. These terminals are intended to be attached directly to Type MGS-8 guardrail. Therefore, designers will need to include an appropriate transition section for connecting a Type 2M guardrail terminal to either Type B or Type T guardrail (refer to Standard Plan R-60-Series). Current Type 2M terminals available for use are the MSKT, the Soft-Stop, and the MAX-Tension. Contact the Geometrics Design Unit, Design Division, for additional information regarding MASH-compliant guardrail terminals. 4. Minimum Offset The original intent of the Type 2 terminals was to provide endings that required no offset. This was the orientation used in the crash tested system. It was later determined by the FHWA that a 12" offset would be acceptable without further testing. This minimal offset was adopted in Standard Plan R-62-Series in order to minimize the number of nuisance accidents that may occur when the impact head was located close to or encroaching on the shoulder.
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL BRIDGE DESIGN
CHAPTER 7
DESIGN CRITERIA - NEW AND RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 7.01 GENERAL 7.01.01 Design Specifications In general, bridges in Michigan carrying vehicular traffic are designed according to the current edition of the Standard Specifications for the Design of Highway Bridges published by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). The exceptions to changes in AASHTO requirements are presented in this volume of the Design Manual. The AASHTO specifications are also applied in the design of pedestrian bridges and major structures such as retaining walls and pumphouses. Bridges carrying railroads are designed according to the current specifications of the American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association Specifications (AREMA). 7.01.02 Design Method In general, elastomeric pad designs, as well as footing pressure and pile load determinations, are done by the Allowable Stress Method. All other elements of the structure are designed by the Load Factor Method. (12-5-2005)
7.01.03 Design Stresses (12-5-2005) Concrete: Grade S2, S2M, P1M * f'c = 3000 psi Concrete: Grade D, DM * f'c = 4000 psi Steel Reinforcement fy = 60,000 psi Steel Reinforcement: Stirrups for Prestressed Beams fy = 60,000 psi Stirrups for 17” & 21” Box Beams fy = 40,000 psi Structural Steel: AASHTO M270 Grade 36 Fy = 36,000 psi Grade 50 Fy = 50,000 psi Grade 50W Fy = 50,000 psi Structural Steel Pins: ASTM A276 UNS Designation S20161 or S21800 Fy = 50,000 psi Temp Support Hanger Rods: ASTM A 193 Grade B7 (AISI 4140) 2 ½” and under Fu =125,000psi Fy =105,000 psi Over 2 ½” to 4” Fu =115,000psi Fy = 95,000 psi Over 4” to 7” Fu =100,000psi Fy = 75,000 psi Prestressed Concrete ** f'c = 5000 - 8000 psi Prestressed Concrete Compressive Strength at Release f'ci = 7000 psi (max) Prestressing Strands fpu = 270,000 psi High Strength Bolts:*** Organic zinc rich primer (Class B) (Type 4 coating system) Fs = 32,000 psi * Use Grade S2M, P1M and DM in all
trunkline projects in Metro, University, Grand, Bay, Southwest and North Regions. Use Grade S2 and D in Superior Region and on non-trunkline projects.
** See Subsection 7.02.03. *** Value of Fs is Design Slip Resistance for
Slip-Critical Connections with faying surfaces coated. (12-5-2005) (11-28-2011) (11-24-2014) (10-17-2016) (1-29-2018)
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL BRIDGE DESIGN - CHAPTER 7: LRFD
CHAPTER 7- LRFD
DESIGN CRITERIA - NEW AND RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 7.01 GENERAL 7.01.01 Design Specifications (8-20-2009) In general, bridges in Michigan carrying vehicular traffic are designed according to the current edition of the LRFD Bridge Design Specification published by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). The exceptions to changes in AASHTO requirements are presented in this volume of the Design Manual. The AASHTO specifications are also applied in the design of pedestrian bridges and major structures such as retaining walls and pumphouses. Bridges carrying railroads are designed according to the current specifications of the American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association Specifications (AREMA). 7.01.02 Design Method (8-20-2009) The design of all structural elements shall satisfy Service Limit State and/or Strength Limit State requirements of the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications.
7.01.03 Design Stresses (12-5-2005) Concrete: Grade S2, S2M, P1M * f'c = 3000 psi Concrete: Grade D, DM * f'c = 4000 psi Steel Reinforcement fy = 60,000 psi Steel Reinforcement: Stirrups for Prestressed Beams fy = 60,000 psi Stirrups for 17” & 21” Box Beams fy = 40,000 psi Structural Steel: AASHTO M270 Grade 36 Fy = 36,000 psi Grade 50 Fy = 50,000 psi Grade 50W Fy = 50,000 psi Structural Steel Pins: ASTM A276 UNS Designation S20161 or S21800 Fy = 50,000 psi Temp Support Hanger Rods: ASTM A 193 Grade B7 (AISI 4140) 2 ½” and under Fu =125,000psi Fy =105,000 psi Over 2 ½” to 4” Fu =115,000psi Fy = 95,000 psi Over 4” to 7” Fu =100,000psi Fy = 75,000 psi Prestressed Concrete ** f'c = 5000 - 8000 psi Prestressed Concrete Compressive Strength at Release f'ci = 7000 psi (max) Prestressing Strands fpu = 270,000 psi High Strength Bolts:*** Organic zinc rich primer (Class B) (Type 4 coating system) Fs = 32,000 psi * Use Grade S2M, P1M and DM in all
trunkline projects in Metro, University, Grand, Bay, Southwest and North Regions. Use Grade S2 and D in Superior Region and on non-trunkline projects.
** See Subsection 7.02.03. *** Value of Fs is Design Slip Resistance for
Slip-Critical Connections with faying surfaces coated. (12-5-2005)(11-28-2011) (11-24-2014) (10-17-2016) (1-29-2018)
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL BRIDGE DESIGN
8.02 (continued) TITLE SHEET G. The design of the structural members is
based on material of the following grades and stresses:
Concrete: Grade S2, S2M, P1M * f'c = 3,000 psi Concrete: Grade D, DM * f'c = 4,000 psi Steel Reinforcement fy = 60,000 psi Steel Reinforcement: (Stirrups for Prestressed Beams fy = 60,000 psi) (Stirrups for (17”) (21”) Box Beams fy = 40,000 psi) Structural Steel: AASHTO M270 Grade 36 Fy = 36,000 psi Structural Steel: AASHTO M270 Grade 50 Fy = 50,000 psi Structural Steel: AASHTO M270 Grade 50W Fy = 50,000 psi Structural Steel Pins: ASTM A276 UNS Designation S20161 or S21800 Fy = 50,000 psi Temp Support Hanger Rods: ASTM A 193 Grade B7 (AISI 4140)
2½” and under Fu =125,000 psi Fy =105,000 psi
Over 2½” to 4” Fu =115,000 psi Fy = 95,000 psi
Over 4” to 7” Fu =100,000 psi Fy = 75,000 psi Prestressed Concrete f'c = psi Prestressed Concrete Compressive Strength at Release f'ci = psi [7000 psi max] Prestressing Strands fpu = 270,000 psi
[*Use Grade S2M, P1M and DM in all trunkline projects in Metro, University, Grand, Bay, Southwest and North Regions. Use Grade S2 and D in Superior Region and on non-trunkline projects.]
(12-5-05) (11-28-11) (11-24-2014) (10-17-2016) (1-29-2018)
8.02 (continued) H. (year) Estimated Traffic Distribution 0000 Average Daily Traffic (000) Design Hourly Volume % Commercial 0000 Commercial Directional Design
Hourly Volume 0000 Directional Traffic 0000 Total Traffic [Use on Rehabilitation jobs where there is
no plan of site or structure.] (9-18-98) I. All exposed concrete corners shown
square on the plans shall be beveled with ½” triangular moldings except as otherwise noted. (8-20-99)
J. Note deleted. (1-29-2018) K. Old plans do not exist for this structure.
[Use on all projects where the designer is unable to verify that existing structure plans exist.] (11-28-2011)
L. The bridge paint may contain lead. [Use
on all projects with existing painted structural steel regardless of work type. If no bridge Title Sheet is present with project place note on road Note Sheet. Also place on existing structural steel sheets (see note 8.09.07 D.)]
(11-28-2011) M. Note skipped N. Unless otherwise shown on the plans
provide minimum concrete clear cover for reinforcement according to the following:
Concrete cast against earth: 3 in. Prestressed Beams: 1 in. All other unless shown on plans: 2 in. (11-28-2011) O. The bridge deck surface has an HMA
overlay, HMA cap or HMA patches. Removal of HMA as a result of removal of other superstructure items shall be included in the removal of those items. (11-28-2011)
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL BRIDGE DESIGN - CHAPTER 8: LRFD
8.02 (continued) TITLE SHEET D. The stationing as shown on these plans
for the intersection of the centerline of bridge and roadway (and the railroad) centerline is believed to be correct. It shall, however, be checked at the time of starting construction, and if the stationing shown on the plans is incorrect, it shall be reported to the Design office in Lansing, and the structure shall be staked out using the actual intersection of the centerline of bridge and roadway (and the railroad) centerline as the control point.
E. This contract is for "Structural Steel,
, Furn and Fab" only. Other items of work indicated on these plans are not a part of this contract. [Use when structural steel furnishing and fabricating must be done early in project to ensure timely delivery for construction.] (12-5-2005)
F. The Regulated Waste Activity
Identification Numbers for this project are as follows:
Control Section Number
[Use when cleaning or working on painted steel structure constructed prior to 1978 or when hydrodemolition is part of the project work. Place note directly above title block and use lettering twice the size of the other notes.] (9-18-98) (4-18-2016)
8.02 (continued) G. The design of the structural members is
based on material of the following grades and stresses:
Concrete: Grade S2, S2M, P1M * f'c = 3,000 psi Concrete: Grade D, DM * f'c = 4,000 psi Steel Reinforcement fy = 60,000 psi Steel Reinforcement: (Stirrups for Prestressed Beams fy = 60,000 psi) (Stirrups for (17”) (21”) Box Beams fy = 40,000 psi) Structural Steel: AASHTO M270 Grade 36 Fy = 36,000 psi Structural Steel: AASHTO M270 Grade 50 Fy = 50,000 psi Structural Steel: AASHTO M270 Grade 50W Fy = 50,000 psi Structural Steel Pins: ASTM A276 UNS Designation S20161 or S21800 Fy = 50,000 psi Temp Support Hanger Rods: ASTM A 193 Grade B7 (AISI 4140)
2½” and under Fu =125,000 psi Fy =105,000 psi
Over 2½” to 4” Fu =115,000 psi Fy = 95,000 psi
Over 4” to 7” Fu =100,000 psi Fy = 75,000 psi Prestressed Concrete f'c = psi Prestressed Concrete Compressive Strength at Release f'ci = psi [7000 psi max] Prestressing Strands fpu = 270,000 psi
[*Use Grade S2M, P1M and DM in all trunkline projects in Metro, University, Grand, Bay, Southwest and North Regions. Use Grade S2 and D in Superior Region and on non-trunkline projects.]
(12-5-2005) (11-28-2011) (11-24-2014) (10-17-2016) (1-29-2018)
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL BRIDGE DESIGN - CHAPTER 8: LRFD
8.02 (continued) TITLE SHEET H. (year) Estimated Traffic Distribution 0000 Average Daily Traffic (000) Design Hourly Volume % Commercial 0000 Commercial Directional Design
Hourly Volume 0000 Directional Traffic 0000 Total Traffic [Use on Rehabilitation jobs where there is no
plan of site or structure.] (9-18-98) I. All exposed concrete corners shown
square on the plans shall be beveled with ½” triangular moldings except as otherwise noted. (8-20-99)
J. Note deleted. (1-29-2018) K. Old plans do not exist for this structure.
[Use on all projects where the designer is unable to verify that existing structure plans exist.] (8-20-2009)
L. The bridge paint may contain lead. [Use
on all projects with existing painted structural steel regardless of work type. If no bridge Title Sheet is present with project place note on road Note Sheet. Also place on existing structural steel sheets (see note 8.09.07 D.)] (8-20-2009)
8.02 (continued) M. The design of the foundation piling is
based on material of the following grades and stresses (and losses):
Concrete: Grade S1 f'c = 3,500 psi Steel Reinforcement fy = 60,000 psi Foundation Piling (Steel H-Piling): AASHTO M270 Grade 50 Fy = 50,000 psi Foundation Piling (Steel H-Piling): AASHTO M270 Grade 50W Fy = 50,000 psi Foundation Piling (Steel Shells): ASTM A 252 Grade 3 Fy = 45,000 psi Foundation Piling (Timber) FCO = 900 psi (8-20-2009) N. Unless otherwise shown on the plans
provide minimum concrete clear cover for reinforcement according to the following:
Concrete cast against earth: 3 in. Prestressed Beams: 1 in. All other unless shown on plans: 2 in. (8-20-2009) O. The bridge deck surface has an HMA
overlay, HMA cap or HMA patches. Removal of HMA as a result of removal of other superstructure items shall be included in the removal of those items. (8-20-2009)
P. (FAA Obstruction) (,) (and) (Michigan Tall
Structure) (,) (and) (Municipal Airport) permit(s) (have) (has) been obtained for this project. The Contractor is responsible for ensuring that all work is performed in compliance with (this) (these) permit(s). [Use when applicable permits have been obtained for project] (3-20-2017)
Q. This project has been evaluated using the
FAA Notice Criteria Tool for a structure height of ____ feet above a ground level elevation of ____ feet and no permits are required. [Use when FAA Obstruction, Michigan Tall Structure or Municipal Airport permits are not required for the project.] (3-20-2017)
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL
BRIDGE DESIGN
7.06.02 Concrete Anchors (5-6-99) A. Expansion Anchored Bolts In addition to field testing, we will ensure sound anchorage by reducing the design loads. The values to be used will vary with the application as shown below:
PULLOUT VALUES OF EXPANSION ANCHORED BOLTS IN POUNDS
Application Approx.Safety Factor
⅜” ½” ⅝” ¾” ⅞”
Noncritical Design Loads (Including noncritical, static or shock loads) 4 875 1,620 2,565 3,775 5,240
Vibratory Loads (e.g., Sign Supports) 12 290 540 855 1,260 1,755
Design details should always call for two or more anchors for redundancy.
B. Bonded Anchors (Adhesive and Grout Anchors)
All bonded anchors shall be detailed for embedment depth on the contract plans. For A307 bolts the embedment depth shall be taken as “9d” (9 times the nominal bolt diameter). For Grade 60(ksi) reinforcing steel the embedment depth shall be taken as “12d” (12 times the bar diameter). (5-1-2000) In addition to field testing, we will ensure sound anchorage by reducing the design loads. For all applications a safety factor of 4 should be applied to 125% of the threaded rod/reinforcements yield strength to obtain the allowable design tensile load on the anchor. The allowable tensile load shall be computed per: Allowable tensile load = (125% fy AT)/4 AT = tensile stress area = net section through threads (for reinforcing steel use nominal area) (1-29-2018)
C. Allowable Shear for Post Installed Concrete Anchors (Expansion and Bonded Anchors) (per AASHTO Table 10.32.3A)
Allowable Shear = 0.30 fy AT AT = tensile stress area = net section through threads (for reinforcing steel use nominal area)
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL
BRIDGE DESIGN - CHAPTER 7: LRFD
7.06.02 Concrete Anchors (5-6-99) A. Expansion Anchored Bolts In addition to field testing, we will ensure sound anchorage by reducing the design loads. The values to be used will vary with the application as shown below:
PULLOUT VALUES OF EXPANSION ANCHORED BOLTS IN POUNDS
Application Approx.Safety Factor
⅜” ½” ⅝” ¾” ⅞”
Noncritical Design Loads (Including noncritical, static or shock loads) 4 875 1,620 2,565 3,775 5,240
Vibratory Loads (e.g., Sign Supports) 12 290 540 855 1,260 1,755
Design details should always call for two or more anchors for redundancy. B. Bonded Anchors (Adhesive and Grout Anchors) All bonded anchors shall be detailed for embedment depth on the contract plans. For A307 bolts the embedment depth shall be taken as “9d” (9 times the nominal bolt diameter). For Grade 60(ksi) reinforcing steel the embedment depth shall be taken as “12d” (12 times the bar diameter). (5-1-2000) In addition to field testing, we will ensure sound anchorage by reducing the design loads. For all applications a safety factor of 4 should be applied to 125% of the threaded rod/reinforcements yield strength to obtain the allowable design tensile load on the anchor. The allowable tensile load shall be computed per: Allowable tensile load = (125% fy AT)/4 AT = tensile stress area = net section through threads
(for reinforcing steel use nominal area)
(1-29-2018)
C. Allowable Shear for Post Installed
Concrete Anchors (Expansion and Bonded Anchors) (per AASHTO Table 10.32.3A) Allowable Shear = 0.30 fy AT AT = tensile stress area = net section through threads (for reinforcing steel use nominal area)
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL BRIDGE DESIGN
8.06 SUBSTRUCTURE 8.06.01 Miscellaneous Notes A. JWP denotes Joint Waterproofing. B. NS denotes Near Side. C. FS denotes Far Side. D. ES denotes Each Side. E. For bevel and molding details, see
Standard Plan B-103-Series. F. Field-bend reinforcement to clear drain
holes. G. For pile (quantities) (layout) (and notes),
see sheet(s) . H. The Contractor may adhesive anchor
(bolts) (position dowels) in holes drilled in the concrete at (Pier ) (Abutment ). [Use this note for steel beam or prestressed concrete beam bridges, where drilling holes will not damage substructure reinforcement.] (9-18-98)
I. Uplift will occur at abutment(s) (and
pier(s) ) during construction of the superstructure. Anchor bolt nuts and jam nuts shall be placed immediately after erection of the girders in Span(s) _____.
J. The substructure concrete quantity is computed on the basis that the volume of concrete displaced by the embedment of the piles is deducted. [Use when timber or C.I.P. piles are embedded more than 1'-0".] (9-18-98)
8.06.01 (continued) K. Low temperature protection of concrete
shall be applied according to Section 706.03 J. of the Standard Specifications for Construction. Low temperature protection of concrete will not be paid for separately, but will be included in the bid item “Substructure Conc”. [Use when possibility of pouring concrete during cold weather. With known cold weather pours use the pay item for cold weather protection.] (12-5-2005) (11-28-2011)
L. Note deleted. (1-29-2018)
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL BRIDGE DESIGN - CHAPTER 8: LRFD
8.06 SUBSTRUCTURE 8.06.01 Miscellaneous Notes A. JWP denotes Joint Waterproofing. B. NS denotes Near Side. C. FS denotes Far Side. D. ES denotes Each Side. E. For bevel and molding details, see
Standard Plan B-103-Series. F. Field-bend reinforcement to clear drain
holes. G. For pile (quantities) (layout) (and notes),
see sheet(s) . H. The Contractor may adhesive anchor
(bolts) (position dowels) in holes drilled in the concrete at (Pier ) (Abutment ). [Use this note for steel beam or prestressed concrete beam bridges, where drilling holes will not damage substructure reinforcement.] (9-18-98)
I. Uplift will occur at abutment(s) (and
pier(s) ) during construction of the superstructure. Anchor bolt nuts and jam nuts shall be placed immediately after erection of the girders in Span(s) _____.
J. The substructure concrete quantity is computed on the basis that the volume of concrete displaced by the embedment of the piles is deducted. [Use when timber or C.I.P. piles are embedded more than 1'-0".] (9-18-98)
8.06.01 (continued) K. Low temperature protection of concrete
shall be applied according to Section 706.03 J. of the Standard Specifications for Construction. Low temperature protection of concrete will not be paid for separately, but will be included in the bid item “Substructure Conc”. [Use when possibility of pouring concrete during cold weather. With known cold weather pours use the pay item for cold weather protection.] (8-20-2009)
L. Note deleted. (1-29-2018)
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL BRIDGE DESIGN
8.06.08 Substructure Repair Notes A. Mechanical expansion anchors along with
adhesive anchor systems shall be chosen from the Qualified Products List in the current MDOT Materials Source Guide. (12-5-2005)
B. (Penetrating Water Repellent Treatment)
(Concrete Surface Coating) shall be applied to the entire exposed surface of abutment (and ) (except the tops) (and the front face of the independent backwall). [Use when no joint exists above or the abutment is adjacent to a pavement. Apply to tops when Horizontal Surface Sealer is not applied to tops. Use Concrete Surface Coating when requested by Region or Roadside Development section.] (12-5-2005)
C. (Penetrating Water Repellent Treatment)
(Concrete Surface Coating) shall be applied to entire exposed surfaces of pier(s) ____ (except top). [Use when no joint exists above or the pier is adjacent to a pavement. Apply to tops when Horizontal Surface Sealer is not applied to tops. Use Concrete Surface Coating when requested by Region or Roadside Development section.] (12-5-2005)
D. Substructure Horizontal Surface Sealer
shall be applied to the top of (all) Pier(s) (___ & ___) (and) Abutment(s) (___ & ___). Vertical surfaces accidentally coated shall be cleaned at contractor’s expense. [Use when the abutment or pier has been repaired and there is a superstructure transverse joint directly above or the unit is adjacent to a pavement.] (12-5-2005)
E. Forms for large patches shall be installed
in 2'-0" to 4'-0" high sections with the top of form no more than 4'-0" above the level of concrete as the pour progresses.
8.06.08 (continued) F. Note deleted. (1-29-2018)
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL BRIDGE DESIGN - CHAPTER 8: LRFD
8.06.08 Substructure Repair Notes A. Mechanical expansion anchors along with
adhesive anchor systems shall be chosen from the Qualified Products List in the current MDOT Materials Source Guide. (12-5-2005)
B. (Penetrating Water Repellent Treatment)
(Concrete Surface Coating) shall be applied to the entire exposed surface of abutment (and ) (except the tops) (and the front face of the independent backwall). [Use when no joint exists above or the abutment is adjacent to a pavement. Apply to tops when Horizontal Surface Sealer is not applied to tops. Use Concrete Surface Coating when requested by Region or Roadside Development section.] (12-5-2005)
C. (Penetrating Water Repellent Treatment)
(Concrete Surface Coating) shall be applied to entire exposed surfaces of pier(s) ____ (except top). [Use when no joint exists above or the pier is adjacent to a pavement. Apply to tops when Horizontal Surface Sealer is not applied to tops. Use Concrete Surface Coating when requested by Region or Roadside Development section.] (12-5-2005)
D. Substructure Horizontal Surface Sealer
shall be applied to the top of (all) Pier(s) (___ & ___) (and) Abutment(s) (___ & ___). Vertical surfaces accidentally coated shall be cleaned at contractor’s expense. [Use when the abutment or pier has been repaired and there is a superstructure transverse joint directly above or the unit is adjacent to a pavement.] (12-5-2005)
E. Forms for large patches shall be installed
in 2'-0" to 4'-0" high sections with the top of form no more than 4'-0" above the level of concrete as the pour progresses.
8.06.08 (continued) F. Note deleted. (1-29-2018)
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL BRIDGE DESIGN
8.07.04 (continued) Prestressed Concrete I-Beam & Box Beam Notes P. Any holes cast or formed in the beam
shall be filled with non-shrinking grout. Included in the bid item (“Prest Conc 1800 Beam, Erect”) (“Prest Conc Bulb-Tee Beam, Erect, ___ inch by ___ inch”). [Use for Michigan 1800 Prestressed I-Beam and Bulb-Tee Beams.] (12-5-2005) (4-17-2017)
Q. The outer 6" of the top surface of the
beam shall be fabricated to a smooth trowel finish, and then coated with a bond breaker as specified in section 708 of the Standard Specifications. [Use for Michigan 1800 Prestressed I-Beam and Bulb-Tee Beams.]
(12-5-2005) (4-17-2017) R. At the locations shown on these plans,
coat the beams using a material selected from the Special Provision for Concrete Surface Coatings. Apply the coating in the manner specified in the Special provision for a distance of ______ feet, starting from the beam end at the joint, coating both sides and bottom of beam. [Use on Prestressed I-Beam, Bulb-Tee Beams and Spread box beam projects with expansion joints on the bridge. Show the locations to be coated on the erection diagram (new) or on existing General Plan of Structure sheet for existing beams.]
(10-24-2001) (11-28-2011) (4-17-2017) S. Coat the entire outside and bottom of the
fascia beam using a material selected from the Special Provision for Concrete Surface Coatings. Apply the coating according to the Special Provision. [Use on Prestressed I-Beam, Bulb-Tee Beams and spread box beam projects where the beam ends are being coated and where coating fascia beams will not significantly effect the maintaining traffic scheme of the project.]
(10-24-2001) (11-28-2011) (4-17-2017)
8.07.04 (continued) T. Steel for sole plates and other bearing
components shall meet the requirements of AASHTO M 270 Grade 36. Sole plates are required in all beam ends.
(12-5-2005) (11-24-2014) U. Beam steel reinforcement, including
stirrups, shall be Grade 60 (ksi). [Use for all I-Beams, Bulb-Tee Beams and all box beams except 17” & 21" box beams.] (12-5-2005) (11-28-2011) (4-17-2017)
V. Field drilling shall be allowed for sign
support anchors only. Location of anchors shall be as detailed on Traffic & Safety Sign Support Special Details. Any damage to the beams shall be repaired at the contractor’s expense and approved by the Engineer. (11-28-2011)
W. Items cast into the beams to facilitate
bridge construction (forming, finishing, etc.) shall be galvanized or epoxy coated. (8-20-2009) (3-18-2013) (6-17-2013)
X. Concrete inserts shall be 1” diameter;
Dayton Superior, Type B-1 Standard or Type B-18; Williams Form, Type C 12; Meadow Burke, Type CT-2; or equal. Inserts (coil or ferrule) must be electroplate galvanized in accordance with ASTM B633, Service Condition 4. Inserts shall be cast with the beams. Field installation of inserts is not allowed. [Use for I-Beams, Bulb-Tee Beams and spread box beams.]
(11-28-2011) (2-16-2016) (4-17-2017) Y. Note deleted. (1-29-2018) Z. Longitudinal beam steel reinforcement (A
bars) shall be Grade 60 (ksi). The design of transverse beam steel reinforcement, stirrups and slab ties (ED & D bars) is based on Grade 40 (ksi); the use of either Grade 40 or Grade 60 is allowed in construction of the beam. [Use for 17” & 21” box beams.]
(11-28-2011) (11-24-2014)
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL BRIDGE DESIGN - CHAPTER 8: LRFD
8.07.04 (continued) Prestressed Concrete I-Beam & Box Beam Notes P. Any holes cast or formed in the beam
shall be filled with non-shrinking grout. Included in the bid item (“Prest Conc 1800 Beam, Erect”) (Prest Conc Bulb-Tee Beam, Erect, ___ inch by ___ inch”). [Use for Michigan 1800 Prestressed I-Beam and Bulb-Tee Beams.]
(12-5-2005) (4-17-2017) Q. The outer 6" of the top surface of the
beam shall be fabricated to a smooth trowel finish, and then coated with a bond breaker as specified in section 708 of the Standard Specifications. [Use for Michigan 1800 Prestressed I-Beam and Bulb-Tee Beams.]
(12-5-2005) (4-17-2017) R. At the locations shown on these plans,
coat the beams using a material selected from the Special Provision for Concrete Surface Coatings. Apply the coating in the manner specified in the Special provision for a distance of ______ feet, starting from the beam end at the joint, coating both sides and bottom of beam. [Use on Prestressed I-Beam, Bulb-Tee Beams and Spread box beam projects with expansion joints on the bridge. Show the locations to be coated on the erection diagram (new) or on existing General Plan of Structure sheet for existing beams.] (8-20-2009) (4-17-2017)
S. Coat the entire outside and bottom of the
fascia beam using a material selected from the Special Provision for Concrete Surface Coatings. Apply the coating according to the Special Provision. [Use on Prestressed I-Beam, Bulb-Tee Beams and spread box beam projects where the beam ends are being coated and where coating fascia beams will not significantly effect the maintaining traffic scheme of the project.] (8-20-2009) (4-17-2017)
T. Steel for sole plates and other bearing
components shall meet the requirements of AASHTO M 270 Grade 36. Sole plates are required in all beam ends.
(12-5-2005) (11-24-2014)
8.07.04 (continued) U. Beam steel reinforcement, including
stirrups, shall be Grade 60 (ksi). [Use for all I-Beams, Bulb-Tee Beams and all box beams except 17” & 21" box beams.]
(12-5-2005) (11-28-2011) (4-17-2017) V. Field drilling shall be allowed for sign
support anchors only. Location of anchors shall be as detailed on Traffic & Safety Sign Support Special Details. Any damage to the beams shall be repaired at the contractor’s expense and approved by the Engineer. (8-20-2009)
W. Items cast into the beams to facilitate
bridge construction (forming, finishing, etc.) shall be galvanized or epoxy coated. (8-20-2009) (3-18-2013) (6-17-2013)
X. Concrete inserts shall be 1” diameter;
Dayton Superior, Type B-1 Standard or Type B-18; Williams Form, Type C 12; Meadow Burke, Type CT-2; or equal. Inserts (coil or ferrule) must be electroplate galvanized in accordance with ASTM B633, Service Condition 4. Inserts shall be cast with the beams. Field installation of inserts is not allowed. [Use for I-Beams, Bulb-Tee Beams and spread box beams.]
(8-20-2009) (2-16-2016) (4-17-2017) Y. Note deleted. (1-29-2018) Z. Longitudinal beam steel reinforcement (A
bars) shall be Grade 60 (ksi). The design of transverse beam steel reinforcement, stirrups and slab ties (ED & D bars) is based on Grade 40 (ksi); the use of either Grade 40 or Grade 60 is allowed in construction of the beam. [Use for 17” & 21” box beams.]
(11-28-2011) (11-24-2014)
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL BRIDGE DESIGN
8.09 REHABILITATION PROJECTS 8.09.01 Anchoring Bolts or Reinforcement in Existing Concrete A. Mechanical expansion anchors shall be
chosen from the Qualified Products List in the current MDOT Materials Source Guide. (12-5-2005)
B. Systems for anchoring horizontal or
vertical (reinforcement) (bolts) in existing concrete shall be chosen from the Qualified Products List in the current MDOT Materials Source Guide. (12-5-2005)
C. All concrete anchors shall be installed
according to manufacturer’s recommendations, except as modified in these plans. (5-1-2000)
D. Note deleted. (1-29-2018)
8.09.02 Bridge Deck Repair Notes A. The work covered by these plans
includes resurfacing the existing bridge deck and maintaining traffic.
B. The work covered by these plans
includes replacing the existing curb or sidewalk with Bridge Barrier Railing, Type 4 (Modified), resurfacing the existing bridge deck, and maintaining traffic.
C. The volume of “Concrete, (Bridge Deck
Ovly) (Silica Fume Modified)” is based on the overlay and an estimated quantity to replace unsound concrete and to make (crown) (superelevation) (grade) adjustments as determined by the Engineer. (12-5-2005)
D. Note Deleted. (3-20-2017) E. The plan quantity of scarifying involves
an amount for the approaches which assumes an area equivalent to five passes over the entire surface, ¼” deep, to obtain a maximum depth of 1¼”. [Use where the deck will be hydrodemolished and the existing concrete approach slab will remain.] (9-18-98)
F. The contractor shall remove and replace
only that portion of the (barrier) (sidewalk)(brush block) that is necessary for installation of the deck joint.
G. The bid item "Deck Joint, Rem" includes
hand chipping within limits required for removal. (12-5-2005)
H. Before overlaying, sound concrete to
determine whether the removal at either side of transverse joints will be adequate. Increase the removal limits as approved by the Engineer. (5-22-2017)
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL BRIDGE DESIGN - CHAPTER 8: LRFD
8.09 REHABILITATION PROJECTS 8.09.01 Anchoring Bolts or Reinforcement in Existing Concrete A. Mechanical expansion anchors shall be
chosen from the Qualified Products List in the current MDOT Materials Source Guide. (12-5-2005)
B. Systems for anchoring horizontal or
vertical (reinforcement) (bolts) in existing concrete shall be chosen from the Qualified Products List in the current MDOT Materials Source Guide. (12-5-2005)
C. All concrete anchors shall be installed
according to manufacturer’s recommendations, except as modified in these plans. (5-1-2000)
D. Note deleted. (1-29-2018)
8.09.02 Bridge Deck Repair Notes A. The work covered by these plans
includes resurfacing the existing bridge deck and maintaining traffic.
B. The work covered by these plans
includes replacing the existing curb or sidewalk with Bridge Barrier Railing, Type 4 (Modified), resurfacing the existing bridge deck, and maintaining traffic.
C. The volume of “Concrete, (Bridge Deck
Ovly) (Silica Fume Modified)” is based on the overlay and an estimated quantity to replace unsound concrete and to make (crown) (superelevation) (grade) adjustments as determined by the Engineer. (12-5-2005)
D. Note Deleted. (3-20-2017) E. The plan quantity of scarifying involves
an amount for the approaches which assumes an area equivalent to five passes over the entire surface, ¼” deep, to obtain a maximum depth of 1¼”. [Use where the deck will be hydrodemolished and the existing concrete approach slab will remain.] (9-18-98)
F. The contractor shall remove and replace
only that portion of the (barrier) (sidewalk)(brush block) that is necessary for installation of the deck joint.
G. The bid item "Deck Joint, Rem" includes
hand chipping within limits required for removal. (12-5-2005)
H. Before overlaying, sound concrete to
determine whether the removal at either side of transverse joints will be adequate. Increase the removal limits as approved by the Engineer. (5-22-2017)
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL BRIDGE DESIGN
12.08.02 Concrete Repair - General (10-24-2001) Embedded Galvanic Anodes for Concrete Repairs Galvanic anodes consist of a circular cylinder (approx. 1" thick and approx. 3" diameter) shaped cementitious shell encapsulating a zinc electrolyte. The embedded galvanic anodes serve to provide localized corrosion protection to existing uncoated steel reinforcement. Often, when new concrete is placed adjacent to old concrete, corrosion in the old concrete is accelerated. This is the result of a difference in the electrolytic potential between the new and old concrete. When placed at the specified spacing along the perimeter of concrete patches or along the interface between new/existing concrete, the anodes mitigate the formation of new corrosion sites in the existing concrete. The embedded anodes have a life expectancy of 15 to 20 years, which is dependent on anode spacing and environmental exposure. Embedded anodes must be tied to uncoated steel reinforcement for proper function. Suggested uses for the embedded galvanic anodes are as follows: 1. Bridge deck widening, where new
concrete placed next to old. 2. Deck joint replacement, where new
concrete placed next to old. 3. Substructure repairs, where new
concrete placed next to old. 4. Deck repairs, where greater than ten
years patch service life is required. 5. Substructure widening, where new
concrete placed next to old. For items 1 thru 5, placement of anodes will follow the Standard Specifications for Construction. (1-29-2018)
12.08.03 Substructure Repairs A. Patching This work generally includes the sealing of cracks and patching of spalled areas. Designers should be aware that the cost of extensive substructure patching may be more than the cost of removal and replacement of a portion of the unit. Where removal of substructure portions is feasible it should be considered. A prime example of this is removing a portion of a pier cap on a project that includes superstructure replacement. (5-1-2000) 1. Removal of concrete shall be paid for as
"Hand Chipping, Other Than Deck" and includes all areas excluding the top surface of the deck and sidewalk; i.e. all substructure units, the underside of the deck, and the barriers and fascias.
2. Patching mixtures include latex modified
(LM) concrete as one of the choices. Since its bonding characteristics are superior to the others, LM concrete mixtures (Table 703-2 in the Standard Specifications) should be used for substructure repair where latex is relatively available. In the North and Superior Regions, this mixture should be used only where the project already includes LM concrete for a deck overlay. Otherwise, repairs should be made with a concrete patching mixture from Table 703-1. (5-1-2000)
3. When substructure units are patched, the
entire surface of the substructure unit shall be coated with "Penetrating Water Repellent Treatment" to prevent further deterioration. As an alternative, where aesthetics are important, an elastomeric concrete sealer may be used. See Section 7.03.11. (5-1-2000)