Performance Measurement, Regulation and UK Productivity A Multidisciplinary Overview of

Post on 03-Jan-2016

10 views 2 download

description

Performance Measurement, Regulation and UK Productivity A Multidisciplinary Overview of Unintended and Indirect Effects Ideas factory Presentation, 29 September 2005. Joseph Antony, Gerben Bakker, Kim Tan, Kathryn Walsh and Alan Williams Leeds-Essex-Nottingham-Loughborough-Exeter. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Performance Measurement, Regulation and UK Productivity A Multidisciplinary Overview of

1

Performance Measurement, Regulation and UK Productivity

A Multidisciplinary Overview of

Unintended and Indirect Effects

Ideas factory Presentation, 29 September 2005

Joseph Antony, Gerben Bakker, Kim Tan, Kathryn Walsh and Alan Williams

Leeds-Essex-Nottingham-Loughborough-Exeter

2

The Puzzle:

British productivity is lagging

Many attempts to improve it, without a winning result

Could regulation hold the key to the problem?

3

Objectives:

1. Multidisciplinary literature overview

1. Seminal cases

2. Comparison of methods

3. Scales of observation

2. Detailed analysis of small number of cases

4

Objectives:

3. Develop framework for larger proposal

4. Effect on long-run UK productivity vis-à-vis US and Europe• Implications for managers and policy makers

5

Some issues:

• Multidisciplinary overview literature• Cost-benefit analysis• Optimal precision administrative rules• Measuring regulation across countries• Connection performance measurement within firm with

regulation

6

Some issues (continued):

• The policy landscape• The politics of regulatory change

• Not getting a slice of the larger pie• Sowing the seeds of one’s own destruction

7

Potential case studies:

• Airline deregulation• End-of-life legislation• Other cases

8

Investigators and roles:

• S. Joseph Anthony• Gerben Bakker• Kim Tan• Kathryn Walsh• Alan Williams

9

Outputs:

• Framework for follow-up large-scale project• Pilot/feasibility study for potential case studies• Essay-style review of the literature

– Multidisciplinary– Seminal cases– Identificayion of gaps

• Article in academic journal based on review

10

Impact:

• Academics• Policy makers• Firms• Investors• Emergence interdisciplinary knowledge network• Follow-up large-scale project

11

End-of-life legislations: the indirect consequences

Dr. Joseph Antony

Dr. Anjula Gurtoo

12

Focus

• How legislations impact productivity– Focus: End of life legislations

• Direct consequences: recycling, waste management, costs, technology – new technologies and tech. efficiency

• Indirect consequences • Unforeseen consequences• Unintended consequences

13

Some significant issues

• Seen to significantly impacts producers in electronic and electrical, automotive/transport and producers heavily using plastics and metals. These are typically large size UK companies.

• Calls for a different framework of consumption – away from the current paradigm of ‘individualism’ and ‘ownership’. Evolution of shared/community consumption structures? How much are we willing to give in?

• Study of Risk: to the government; industry; at the level of producer, lender and industrial user/buyer.

14

Research plan

• Nature of end-of-life legislations: its various forms• Identification of focus areas/fields • Identification of industry specific and focus specific journals and

authors• Data collection• A tentative outline of analysis

– Possible indirect consequence – which industries gets impacted – the significant issues – key effects and findings - author(s) who has studied the effect

• The emerging framework of legislation and UK productivity

15

Time lines

• Sept to November 2005 – identification of issues and data collection• December 2005 – review meeting• Jan to March 2006 – data collection and analysis

• April 2006 – presentation of analysis

16

Performance Measurement, Regulation and UK Productivity

Feedback

Joseph Antony, Gerben Bakker, Kim Tan, Kathryn Walsh and Alan Williams

Leeds-Essex-Nottingham-Loughborough-Exeter

17

Productivity & Regulation

• Internal/external perspectives– Small-scale pilot study of c. one year

• Integration/coordination– Several meetings planned– Multidisciplinarity is project’s strength

• Balance

18

Productivity & Regulation

• Ambitious blue skies research• Front-loaded with exploratory work• In the spirit of the Ideas Factory

19

Productivity & Regulation

• Focus on regulation• Common framework

– Institutional economics approach (North)– Multilevel governance

20

Productivity & Regulation

• Exploration and clarification of terms and concepts– Intended/unintended– Foreseen/unforeseen– Direct/indirect

21

Productivity & Regulation

• Positive effect of regulation– E.g. Porter + Vanderlinde JEP 1997

22

Planning

• Start first October

• End: January 2007

23

Planning:

Phases:

1. Exploration

2. Integration, common framework

3. Future outlook/proposal